Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 63 references

Low-order reaction-diffusion system approximates heat transfer and flow structure in annular convection

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In annular convection, heat transfer grows as the quarter power of the Rayleigh number, according to a low-order reaction-diffusion model.

desk verdict A genuinely useful reduced model for annular convection heat transfer, with an honest but real gap in the scaling derivation; worth refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.16488 v3 pith:CHTVOA3V submitted 2024-11-25 physics.flu-dyn

Yuejia Zhang , Nicholas J. Moore , Jinzi Mac Huang This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.flu-dyn
keywords annularconvectionNusseltnumberRayleighscalingboundarylayerreaction-diffusionsystemlarge-scalecirculationNavier-Stokes-Boussinesqmodereduction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that heat transfer in a two-dimensional annular convection cell follows $Nu \propto Ra^{1/4}$ at high Rayleigh number, and that the scaling is set by the thermal boundary layer of the first angular temperature mode. The authors truncate the Navier\u2013Stokes\u2013Boussinesq equations to the lowest Fourier mode in angle while keeping the full radial profile, obtaining a reaction\u2013diffusion system for the azimuthal flow and the two first-order temperature modes. Boundary-layer matching inside this system gives a layer thickness $\delta \sim Ra^{-1/4}$, hence $Nu \sim Ra^{1/4}$. Direct numerical simulations over roughly four decades of $Ra$ and three Prandtl numbers agree with the model's heat transfer to within 5\u201320 percent, although the model does not capture large-scale circulation reversals. If correct, the result shows that time-averaged thermal transport in this geometry is a boundary-layer phenomenon that a low-order, first-principles model can capture.

What carries the argument

The central object is the first-mode reaction\u2013diffusion system (Eqs. 22\u201324) for $u_0(r,t), a_1(r,t), b_1(r,t)$: radial diffusion in $r$ competes with nonlinear reactions $-u_0 b_1/r$ and $u_0 a_1/r$ that represent convective heat transport, while the $Pr\,Ra\,a_1/2$ term feeds buoyancy back into momentum. The argument is carried by an inner\u2013outer boundary-layer analysis: in the stretched coordinate $R = (1/2 - r)/\delta$, the dominant balance reduces the system to $\delta^{-2}A'' = 2UB$, $\delta^{-2}B'' = -2UA$, $\delta^{-2}U'' = -\frac{1}{2} Ra\,A$. The exponent-counting relations (32) are underdetermined, and are closed by the maximum-principle bound that the steady temperature satisfies $0 \le T \le 1$, forcing $A, B = O(1)$. The resulting scalings $\mu = \nu = 0$, $\lambda = 1/2$, $\epsilon = -1/4$ give $\delta = O(Ra^{-1/4})$ and, through the definition of $Nu$, the $Ra^{1/4}$ law.

What would settle it

A decisive test would be to solve the RD model at successively larger $Ra$ and measure whether $\max|a_1|$ and $\max|b_1|$ stay bounded while $\delta$ shrinks like $Ra^{-1/4}$; if either coefficient grows algebraically with $Ra$, the exponent closure fails. Likewise, annular DNS or experiments extending to $Ra \gtrsim 10^{10}$ that show $Nu$ departing from $Ra^{1/4}$\u2014for example trending toward $2/7$ or higher\u2014would falsify the claim that the boundary layer of the lowest mode controls transport.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For $Ra \gg 1$, the paper argues that the Nusselt number in the annulus grows as $Nu \propto Ra^{1/4}$, and that the physics responsible is contained in just three radially varying fields: the azimuthal velocity $u_0$ and the first Fourier coefficients $a_1, b_1$ of temperature, whose coupled reaction\u2013diffusion equations form a closed system. Boundary-layer analysis of these equations, closed by a maximum-principle bound on $a_1, b_1$, yields $u_0 = O(Ra^{1/2})$, boundary-layer thickness $\delta = O(Ra^{-1/4})$, and consequently a wall heat flux of order $Ra^{1/4}$. The paper further reports that this prediction agrees with direct numerical simulations to within 5\u201320 percent in $Nu$, and that $Re \propto Pr^{-1}Ra^{1/2}$ and $L_{rms} \propto Ra^{1/2}$ are recovered. The model is not a complete description: it misses large-scale circulation reversals and turbulent fluctuations, which the authors argue contribute the positive corrections that may bias observations toward the competing $2/7$ exponent.

Load-bearing premise

The argument stands or falls on the claim that the steady-state Fourier coefficients $A$ and $B$ remain $O(1)$ as $Ra \to \infty$, justified by a maximum principle on the full temperature field; the truncated reaction-diffusion model is not shown to inherit that bound, and the matching constant $C$ in the outer solution is left undetermined.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In the annulus, the high-$Ra$ heat-transfer law $Nu \propto Ra^{1/4}$ follows from the boundary layer of the first temperature mode, so no bulk-mixing or plume phenomenology is needed for the leading scaling.
  • The RD model reproduces DNS heat transfer to within 5\u201320 percent across $Ra$ from about $10^5$ to $3 \times 10^9$ and $Pr = 0.5, 4, 16$, so time-averaged transport can be predicted cheaply compared with full DNS.
  • The same boundary-layer analysis gives $Re \propto Pr^{-1}Ra^{1/2}$ and $L_{rms} \propto Ra^{1/2}$, matching the classical Rayleigh\u2013B\u00e9nard inertial scalings in this geometry.
  • Adding higher angular modes should improve the accuracy of $Nu$ and may recover reversal dynamics; the present model cannot generate chaotic reversals because radial over-resolution damps them.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extension the authors leave implicit: if the exponent closure survives adding the $n=2$ mode, then the $1/4$ exponent is robust while the prefactor and the 5\u201320 percent gap change; this is a direct and cheap numerical test.
  • The maximum-principle closure treats the truncated coefficients as if they inherit the bound of the full temperature field; checking numerically whether $\max|a_1|$ and $\max|b_1|$ stay $O(1)$ at higher $Ra$ would either confirm or break the argument.
  • Because the RD model resolves the radial wall flux, it is natural to couple it to moving-boundary problems such as melting or dissolving solids in annular convection, where time-averaged transport controls the interface speed.
  • The unresolved matching constant $C$ means the theory predicts the exponent but not the absolute prefactor; a future computation of $C$ would turn the scaling law into a quantitative prediction.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper derives a low-order reaction-diffusion PDE model for annular thermal convection by retaining the first angular temperature modes a1,b1 and the axisymmetric angular velocity u0 while resolving the full radial dependence. The model is solved numerically and compared with direct numerical simulations of the Navier-Stokes-Boussinesq equations for three Prandtl numbers over roughly four decades of Rayleigh number. Boundary-layer analysis of the PDE model gives the scaling predictions Nu ~ Ra^{1/4}, Re ~ Pr^{-1} Ra^{1/2}, and L_rms ~ Ra^{1/2}. The Nusselt number predictions agree with DNS within 5-20% over the range tested, although the authors correctly note that the Ra^{1/4} and Ra^{2/7} scalings are difficult to distinguish from the DNS data. The paper also clearly states that the RD model does not reproduce chaotic LSC reversal dynamics.

Significance. If the scaling derivation is made rigorous, the paper offers a genuinely low-degree-of-freedom, parameter-free explanation of heat-transfer scaling in a convective geometry with a strong large-scale circulation. The model is derived from the governing equations rather than fitted, and the DNS comparison is an independent benchmark, which is a notable strength. The authors are also appropriately candid about the model's failures: it misses reversal dynamics, and the measured Nusselt exponent is not uniquely 1/4 versus 2/7. For the fluid-dynamics community, the value of the paper is its demonstration that the first Fourier modes with full radial resolution capture boundary-layer structure and heat transfer, providing a possible bridge between coarse ODE models and full DNS.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. V, after Eq. (32)] The closure of the exponent balance is load-bearing and, as written, is not justified. The manuscript applies a maximum principle for the steady temperature field of the full Navier-Stokes equations to conclude that the Fourier coefficients A and B of the truncated RD system are O(1), giving nu = 0 in Eq. (32). But A and B are coefficients of the RD model (22)-(26), not necessarily Fourier coefficients of the full DNS temperature field, and a Galerkin truncation does not automatically inherit the maximum principle. The separate statement that B(0) = -1/2 implies nu = 0 is also not sufficient by itself, since a family of functions can have a fixed boundary value while its interior amplitude grows with Ra. Because Eq. (34), Nu ~ Ra^{1/4}, depends directly on this closure, the argument needs to be repaired: one should prove, or at least explicitly state, that the reconstructed field T = 1/2 + a1(r) cos(theta) + b1(r) sin(theta) satisfies a standard maximum principle for the steady advection-diffusion problem, since with u = u0(r)e_theta the reconstructed T obeys Eq. (2) exactly and the boundary data (1 - sin(theta))/2 lie in [0,1]. That would supply the needed O(1) bound on A and B for the truncated model itself.
  2. [Sec. V, outer-region paragraph] The outer-region analysis is not actually a completed matching procedure: the constant C in u0 = Ra^{1/2} C (r - r0^2/r) is left undetermined, and the assertion that a1,b1 = o(Ra^{-1/2}) is stated without a convincing derivation. This does not undermine the Nusselt exponent, which comes from the inner boundary-layer scale, but the abstract and Section VII describe the result as an inner-outer matching solution. Either complete the matching or soften the wording to avoid overstating what has been shown.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Eq. (6)] The boundary condition is printed as T = 1 - sin(theta)/2, which would give boundary values up to 3/2 and contradicts the stated range T in [0,1]. Equation (7) and the maximum-principle discussion indicate that the intended condition is T = (1 - sin(theta))/2; please correct the notation.
  2. [Eqs. (27)-(29)] With the stretched coordinate R = (1/2 - r)/delta, one has d/dr = -delta^{-1} d/dR, so the first-derivative terms in Eqs. (27)-(29) should carry a negative sign rather than the positive sign shown. These terms are formally subdominant relative to the delta^{-2} terms, so Eq. (30) is unaffected, but the displayed equations should be corrected.
  3. [Fig. 7] The compensated plots show that the DNS data are broadly consistent with either alpha = 1/4 or alpha = 2/7, and the text acknowledges this. It would be helpful to state explicitly how many decades of Ra are used when asserting that the DNS 'continue to grow' for the largest Ra runs, since the trend appears to be only a few points.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular reduction: the RD model has no fitted parameters, the DNS benchmark is independent, and the maximum-principle closure is a rigor gap rather than a circular step.

full rationale

The derivation of Nu ~ Ra^{1/4} is not circular. The RD system, Eqs. (22)-(26), contains no fitted parameters; its coefficients are fixed by the Boussinesq equations and the annular geometry, and the DNS comparisons in Figs. 6-7 provide an independent benchmark rather than a target used to define the model. In Sec. V, the exponent balance Eq. (32) is genuinely underdetermined, and the paper closes it with the boundary condition B(0) = -1/2 and with a maximum-principle bound on the full steady temperature field. Whether that bound carries over to the truncated mode equations is not shown, so the skeptic identification of a missing transfer is a legitimate rigor gap; however, the maximum-principle step is an extra physical assumption, not a restatement of the predicted scaling. The outer matching constant C in Eq. (35) is explicitly left undetermined and is not fitted to DNS. Self-citations to Moore & Huang [54] supply the ODE skeleton, numerical implementation details, and critical Rayleigh-number formulas, but these were previously verified against DNS and do not carry the heat-transfer claim. No prediction in the paper reduces by construction to its inputs, so the correct circularity verdict is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a formal Galerkin truncation, a maximum-principle closure that is not proven for the truncated system, and the thin-channel limit despite validation at moderate aspect ratio. No free parameters are fitted to data, and no new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (4)
  • ad hoc to paper Truncating the angular dependence to one Fourier mode (radial velocity u0 and temperature modes a1, b1) captures the heat-transporting boundary-layer structure.
    Section IV introduces Eqs. (22) to (24) by retaining only n=0 velocity and n=1 temperature with no convergence test. The paper later attributes 5 to 20 percent discrepancies to higher modes, so the truncation is load-bearing and unvalidated at the model level.
  • domain assumption The steady-state maximum principle of the full temperature field bounds A and B by O(1), closing the exponent system in Eq. (32).
    Section V states that the steady-state temperature field of Eqs. (2) and (3) satisfies a maximum principle, and therefore the Fourier coefficients A and B are bounded above. The bound is applied to the truncated RD model without proof that the truncation preserves the maximum principle.
  • domain assumption The thin-channel limit r0 tending to 1/2 justifies v tending to 0 and angular independence of u at leading order.
    Section III derives the model in the thin-channel limit, but all validation is performed at r0 = 0.4, which is not an especially thin annulus. The model still works numerically, but the derivation does not explain why.
  • standard math For Ra much greater than 1, the asymptotic matching between inner and outer regions is regular, with outer velocity profile u0 = Ra^{1/2} C(r - r0^2/r).
    Section V matching procedure assumes the standard inner-outer structure and leaves the constant C undetermined, so only the exponent, not the prefactor, is predicted.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Low-order reaction-diffusion system approximates heat transfer and flow structure in annular convection." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CHTVOA3V

@misc{pith2026241116488,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Low-order reaction-diffusion system approximates heat transfer and flow structure in annular convection},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CHTVOA3V}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.16488}
}
abstract

Heat transfer in a fluid can be greatly enhanced by natural convection, giving rise to the nuanced relationship between the Nusselt number and Rayleigh number that has been a focus of modern fluid dynamics. Our work explores convection in an annular domain, where the geometry reinforces the large-scale circulatory flow pattern that is characteristic of natural convection. The flow must match the no-slip condition at the boundary, leading to a thin boundary layer where both the flow velocity and the temperature vary rapidly. To understand the system's heat transfer characteristics, we derive a reduced model from the Navier-Stokes-Boussinesq equations, whereby the equations of flow and heat are transformed to a system of low-order partial differential equations (PDEs) that take the form of a reaction-diffusion system. Solutions to the reaction-diffusion system, though they fail to predict dynamic events, preserve the same boundary-layer structure seen in the direct numerical simulation (DNS). By matching the solutions inside and outside the boundary layer, asymptotic analysis predicts a power-law relationship Nu $\propto$ Ra$^{1/4}$. Though difficult to distinguish from an exponent of 2/7, the predicted power law agrees well with measurements from DNS over several decades of the Rayleigh number. Considering the model's deficiencies in describing turbulent fluctuations and reversal events, the agreement regarding heat transfer characteristics is encouraging and suggests that the methodology of systematically deriving low-order PDEs from the governing equations may provide a useful complement to existing theories.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.16488 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Thermal convection in an annular domain. (a) The 2-dimensional annular fluid domain [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Trajectories of ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Re, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: shows the trajectories of (L, X, Y ) at the same three values of Ra used in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Steady-state RD model solutions of the flow and temperature fields. (a)-(c) show the RD model solutions with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) shows that the product Re · Pr collapses all of the data from different Pr simulations onto a single master curve, which is indeed well predicted by the RD model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Compensated plot of Nu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Figure 3(c) shows the heat transfer rate as quantified by the Nusselt number, Nu

    The ODE model, on the other hand, has only one stable equilibrium that is associated with Re = 0. Figure 3(c) shows the heat transfer rate as quantified by the Nusselt number, Nu. Below the threshold Ra < Ra∗ 1, Nu is identically one for the ODE model but slightly above unity for the DNS – once again due to the fluid motion associated with the conductive ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Salmon, Lectures on Geophysical Fluid Dynamics (Oxford University Press, 1998)

    R. Salmon, Lectures on Geophysical Fluid Dynamics (Oxford University Press, 1998)

    work page 1998

  3. [3]

    Zhong, D

    J.-Q. Zhong, D. Funfschilling, and G. Ahlers, Enhanced heat transport by turbulent two-phase Rayleigh-B´ enard convection, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 124501 (2009)

    work page 2009

  4. [4]

    J. A. Whitehead, Moving heaters as a model of continental drift, Phys. Earth Planet. In. 5, 199 (1972)

    work page 1972

  5. [5]

    Zhang and A

    J. Zhang and A. Libchaber, Periodic boundary motion in thermal turbulence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4361 (2000)

    work page 2000

  6. [6]

    Zhong and J

    J.-Q. Zhong and J. Zhang, Thermal convection with a freely moving top boundary, Phys. Fluids 17, 115105 (2005)

    work page 2005

  7. [7]

    J. A. Whitehead and M. D. Behn, The continental drift convection cell, Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 4301 (2015)

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    J. M. Huang, J.-Q. Zhong, J. Zhang, and L. Mertz, Stochastic dynamics of fluid–structure interaction in turbulent thermal convection, J. Fluid Mech. 854 (2018)

    work page 2018

Show all 63 references
  1. [9]

    T. D. de Wit, V. V. Krasnoselskikh, S. D. Bale, J. W. Bonnell, T. A. Bowen, C. H. K. Chen, C. Froment, K. Goetz, P. R. Harvey, V. K. Jagarlamudi, A. Larosa, R. J. MacDowall, D. M. Malaspina, W. H. Matthaeus, M. Pulupa, M. Velli, and P. L. Whittlesey, Switchbacks in the Near-Su...

    2020

  2. [10]

    McCurdy, N

    M. McCurdy, N. J. Moore, and X. Wang, Predicting convection configurations in coupled fluid–porous systems, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 953, A23 (2022)

    2022

  3. [11]

    J. A. Whitehead, Energy Flow and Earth (Springer, 2024)

    2024

  4. [12]

    Ahlers, S

    G. Ahlers, S. Grossmann, and D. Lohse, Heat transfer and large scale dynamics in turbulent Rayleigh-B´ enard convection, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 503 (2009)

    2009

  5. [13]

    J. J. Niemela, L. Skrbek, K. R. Sreenivasan, and R. J. Donnelly, Turbulent convection at very high Rayleigh numbers, Nature 404, 837 (2000)

    2000

  6. [14]

    Funfschilling, E

    D. Funfschilling, E. Brown, A. Nikolaenko, and G. Ahlers, Heat transport by turbulent Rayleigh–B´ enard convection in cylindrical samples with aspect ratio one and larger, J. Fluid Mech. 536, 145 (2005)

    2005

  7. [15]

    Belmonte, A

    A. Belmonte, A. Tilgner, and A. Libchaber, Temperature and velocity boundary layers in turbulent convection, Physical Review E 50, 269 (1994). 12

    1994

  8. [16]

    Johnston and C

    H. Johnston and C. R. Doering, Comparison of Turbulent Thermal Convection between Conditions of Constant Temper- ature and Constant Flux, Physical Review Letters 102, 064501 (2009)

    2009

  9. [17]

    J. M. Huang and J. Zhang, Rayleigh-B´ enard thermal convection perturbed by a horizontal heat flux, J. Fluid Mech. 954, 10.1017/jfm.2022.1035 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    Vieweg et al

    P. Vieweg et al. , Large-scale flow structures in turbulent Rayleigh-B´ enard convection: Dynamical origin, formation, and role in material transport , Ph.D. thesis (2023)

    2023

  11. [19]

    Castaing, G

    B. Castaing, G. Gunaratne, F. Heslot, L. Kadanoff, A. Libchaber, S. Thomae, X.-Z. Wu, S. Zaleski, and G. Zanetti, Scaling of hard thermal turbulence in Rayleigh-B´ enard convection, J. Fluid Mech.204, 1 (1989)

    1989

  12. [20]

    Grossmann and D

    S. Grossmann and D. Lohse, Scaling in thermal convection: a unifying theory, J. Fluid Mech. 407, 27 (2000)

    2000

  13. [21]

    R. J. A. M. Stevens, E. P. van der Poel, S. Grossmann, and D. Lohse, The unifying theory of scaling in thermal convection: the updated prefactors, J. Fluid Mech. 730, 295 (2013)

    2013

  14. [22]

    K. P. Iyer, J. D. Scheel, J. Schumacher, and K. R. Sreenivasan, Classical 1/3 scaling of convection holds up to Ra = 10 15, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117, 7594 (2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    H. F. Creveling, J. F. D. Paz, J. Y. Baladi, and R. J. Schoenhals, Stability characteristics of a single-phase free convection loop, J. Fluid Mech. 67, 65 (1975)

    1975

  16. [24]

    Gorman, P

    M. Gorman, P. J. Widmann, and K. A. Robbins, Chaotic flow regimes in a convection loop, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 2241 (1984)

    1984

  17. [25]

    Gorman, P

    M. Gorman, P. J. Widmann, and K. A. Robbins, Nonlinear dynamics of a convection loop: a quantitative comparison of experiment with theory, Physica D 19, 255 (1986)

    1986

  18. [26]

    K. R. Sreenivasan, A. Bershadskii, and J. J. Niemela, Mean wind and its reversal in thermal convection, Physical Review E 65, 056306 (2002)

    2002

  19. [27]

    Brown and G

    E. Brown and G. Ahlers, Large-scale circulation model for turbulent Rayleigh-B´ enard convection, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 134501 (2007)

    2007

  20. [28]

    Xi and K.-Q

    H.-D. Xi and K.-Q. Xia, Cessations and reversals of the large-scale circulation in turbulent thermal convection, Phys. Rev. E 75, 066307 (2007)

    2007

  21. [29]

    Sugiyama, R

    K. Sugiyama, R. Ni, R. J. A. M. Stevens, T. S. Chan, S.-Q. Zhou, H.-D. Xi, C. Sun, S. Grossmann, K.-Q. Xia, and D. Lohse, Flow reversals in thermally driven turbulence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 034503 (2010)

    2010

  22. [30]

    H. Song, E. Villermaux, and P. Tong, Coherent oscillations of turbulent Rayleigh-B´ enard convection in a thin vertical disk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 184504 (2011)

    2011

  23. [31]

    Wang, P.-Y

    Y. Wang, P.-Y. Lai, H. Song, and P. Tong, Mechanism of large-scale flow reversals in turbulent thermal convection, Sci. Adv. 4, 7480 (2018)

    2018

  24. [32]

    Chen, S.-D

    X. Chen, S.-D. Huang, K.-Q. Xia, and H.-D. Xi, Emergence of substructures inside the large-scale circulation induces transition in flow reversals in turbulent thermal convection, J. Fluid Mech. 877, R1 (2019)

    2019

  25. [33]

    Chandra and M

    M. Chandra and M. K. Verma, Dynamics and symmetries of flow reversals in turbulent convection, Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics 83, 067303 (2011)

    2011

  26. [34]

    Gallet, J

    B. Gallet, J. Herault, C. Laroche, F. P´ etr´ elis, and S. Fauve, Reversals of a large-scale field generated over a turbulent background, Geophysical & Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics 106, 468 (2012)

    2012

  27. [35]

    Chandra and M

    M. Chandra and M. K. Verma, Flow reversals in turbulent convection via vortex reconnections, Physical review letters 110, 114503 (2013)

    2013

  28. [36]

    A. Xu, X. Chen, and H.-D. Xi, Tristable flow states and reversal of the large-scale circulation in two-dimensional circular convection cells, J. Fluid Mech. 910, A33 (2021)

    2021

  29. [37]

    E. N. Lorenz, Deterministic nonperiodic flow, J. Atmos. Sci. 20, 130 (1963)

    1963

  30. [38]

    F. F. Araujo, S. Grossmann, and D. Lohse, Wind Reversals in Turbulent Rayleigh-B´ enard Convection, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 084502 (2005)

    2005

  31. [39]

    Ni, S.-D

    R. Ni, S.-D. Huang, and K.-Q. Xia, Reversals of the large-scale circulation in quasi-2D Rayleigh–B´ enard convection, J. Fluid Mech. 778, R5 (2015)

    2015

  32. [40]

    Brown, A

    E. Brown, A. Nikolaenko, and G. Ahlers, Reorientation of the large-scale circulation in turbulent Rayleigh-B´ enard convec- tion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 084503 (2005)

    2005

  33. [41]

    Zhang, X

    S. Zhang, X. Chen, Z. Xia, H.-D. Xi, Q. Zhou, and S. Chen, Stabilizing/destabilizing the large-scale circulation in turbulent Rayleigh–B´ enard convection with sidewall temperature control, Journal of Fluid Mechanics915, A14 (2021)

    2021

  34. [42]

    J. M. Huang and J. Zhang, Side-heated Rayleigh–B´ enard convection, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 999, A35 (2024)

    2024

  35. [43]

    Zhang and Q

    Y. Zhang and Q. Zhou, Eliminating flow reversals and enhancing heat transport in turbulent thermal convection with sinusoidally heated plates, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 239, 126560 (2025)

    2025

  36. [44]

    P. P. Vieweg, J. D. Scheel, and J. Schumacher, Supergranule aggregation for constant heat flux-driven turbulent convection, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 013231 (2021)

    2021

  37. [45]

    Ettel, P

    M. Ettel, P. P. Vieweg, and J. Schumacher, Effects of conjugate heat transfer on large-scale flow structures in convection (2025), arXiv:2502.20907 [physics.flu-dyn]

    2025 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Zhong, R

    J.-Q. Zhong, R. J. A. M. Stevens, H. J. H. Clercx, R. Verzicco, D. Lohse, and G. Ahlers, Prandtl-, Rayleigh-, and Rossby- Number Dependence of Heat Transport in Turbulent Rotating Rayleigh-B´ enard Convection, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 044502 (2009)

    2009

  39. [47]

    R. J. A. M. Stevens, J.-Q. Zhong, H. J. H. Clercx, G. Ahlers, and D. Lohse, Transitions between Turbulent States in Rotating Rayleigh-B´ enard Convection, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 024503 (2009)

    2009

  40. [48]

    Ding, G.-Y

    S.-S. Ding, G.-Y. Ding, K. L. Chong, W.-T. Wu, K.-Q. Xia, and J.-Q. Zhong, Vortex dynamics in rotating Rayleigh–B´ enard convection, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 974, A43 (2023). 13

    2023

  41. [49]

    Y. Bao, J. Chen, B.-F. Liu, Z.-S. She, J. Zhang, and Q. Zhou, Enhanced heat transport in partitioned thermal convection, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 784, R5 (2015)

    2015

  42. [50]

    Y.-Z. Li, X. Chen, and H.-D. Xi, Enhanced heat transfer and reduced flow reversals in turbulent thermal convection with an obstructed centre, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 981, A16 (2024)

    2024

  43. [51]

    Huang, M

    S.-D. Huang, M. Kaczorowski, R. Ni, and K.-Q. Xia, Confinement-Induced Heat-Transport Enhancement in Turbulent Thermal Convection, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 104501 (2013)

    2013

  44. [52]

    D. Noto, J. A. Letelier, and H. N. Ulloa, Plume-scale confinement on thermal convection, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 121, e2403699121 (2024), https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.2403699121

    2024 doi

  45. [53]

    K¨ aufer, P

    T. K¨ aufer, P. P. Vieweg, J. Schumacher, and C. Cierpka, Thermal boundary condition studies in large aspect ratio Rayleigh-B´ enard convection, European Journal of Mechanics - B/Fluids101, 283 (2023)

    2023

  46. [54]

    S. Alam, D. Krasnov, A. Pandey, J. P. John, R. J. Samuel, P. P. Vieweg, and J. Schumacher, Turbulent mesoscale convection in the Boussinesq limit and beyond, International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow 115, 109856 (2025)

    2025

  47. [55]

    N. J. Moore and J. M. Huang, Large-scale circulation reversals explained by pendulum correspondence, J. Fluid Mech. 993, A3 (2024)

    2024

  48. [56]

    Peyret, Spectral methods for incompressible viscous flow , Vol

    R. Peyret, Spectral methods for incompressible viscous flow , Vol. 148 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2002)

    2002

  49. [57]

    J. M. Huang, M. J. Shelley, and D. B. Stein, A stable and accurate scheme for solving the Stefan problem coupled with natural convection using the Immersed Boundary Smooth Extension method, J. Comput. Phys. 432, 110162 (2021)

    2021

  50. [58]

    L. N. Trefethen, Spectral methods in MATLAB (SIAM, 2000)

    2000

  51. [59]

    J. M. Huang, M. N. J. Moore, and L. Ristroph, Shape dynamics and scaling laws for a body dissolving in fluid flow, J. Fluid Mech. 765, 10.1017/jfm.2014.718 (2015)

    2015 doi

  52. [60]

    M. N. J. Moore, Riemann-Hilbert Problems for the Shapes Formed by Bodies Dissolving, Melting, and Eroding in Fluid Flows, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 70, 1810 (2017)

    2017

  53. [61]

    Weady, J

    S. Weady, J. Tong, A. Zidovska, and L. Ristroph, Anomalous Convective Flows Carve Pinnacles and Scallops in Melting Ice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 044502 (2022)

    2022

  54. [62]

    J. M. Huang and N. J. Moore, Morphological attractors in natural convective dissolution, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 024501 (2022)

    2022

  55. [63]

    ˙Zukowski, S

    S. ˙Zukowski, S. Magni, F. Osselin, F. Dutka, M. Cooper, A. J. C. Ladd, and P. Szymczak, Invariant Forms of Dissolution Fingers, Physical Review Letters 134, 094101 (2025)

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.