pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.30089 · v1 · pith:CKOKAZ2Nnew · submitted 2026-06-29 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Projection Is All You Need: Interpreting Polarization Measurements in the Orion Clouds with Sub-Alfv\'enic MHD Simulations

Feiyu Quan , Yitao Xu , Keping Qiu , Xiaodan Fan , Hua-bai Li This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 05:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords dust polarizationMHD simulationsOrion ISFAlfven Mach numberprojection effectsmagnetic fieldsmolecular cloudsstar formation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Observed polarization statistics from the Orion ISF match those from projected sub-Alfvénic MHD simulations over many angles.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a statistical comparison between dust polarization mean direction μ and dispersion σ measured in the Orion Integral-Shaped Filament and the same quantities extracted from projections of three-dimensional MHD simulations. It shows that globally sub-Alfvénic simulations, which naturally produce slightly super-Alfvénic dense cores, reproduce the observed range of (μ, σ) values across a broad set of viewing angles once projection effects are included. This matters because it indicates that these two summary statistics alone cannot determine the three-dimensional Alfvén Mach number of the cloud. The result follows from explicit hypothesis testing that accounts for how line-of-sight integration mixes core-scale field deviations with the parent cloud field.

Core claim

Using globally sub-Alfvénic MHD simulations that naturally produce slightly super-Alfvénic dense cores, the authors show through hypothesis testing that the observed (μ, σ) values in the Orion ISF are statistically consistent with these models over a broad range of viewing angles. Modest deviations of core-scale magnetic fields from the parent cloud field, when combined with projection, can generate a wide range of plane-of-sky polarization dispersions. This broad degeneracy implies that μ and σ alone cannot provide precise information about the three-dimensional magnetic-field distribution, and hence the Alfvén Mach number, of an individual cloud. Polarization statistics based solely on (μ,

What carries the argument

Hypothesis testing on the polarization mean μ and dispersion σ extracted from projections of globally sub-Alfvénic MHD simulations at varying viewing angles.

If this is right

  • Diversity in polarization morphology among dense cores arises from modest core-scale field deviations combined with projection.
  • Observations can exclude specific viewing angles but cannot exclude sub-Alfvénic conditions on the basis of (μ, σ) alone.
  • Additional polarization metrics beyond mean direction and dispersion are required to constrain the three-dimensional Alfvén Mach number.
  • Explicit inclusion of projection effects is necessary when using polarization data to diagnose magnetic field importance in molecular clouds.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same projection-induced degeneracy may affect polarization interpretations in other star-forming regions.
  • Combining polarization data with line-of-sight velocity information or multi-scale field measurements could reduce the viewing-angle ambiguity.
  • Simulations with varied initial conditions or higher resolution could test whether the consistency holds only for the chosen sub-Alfvénic setups.

Load-bearing premise

The specific globally sub-Alfvénic MHD simulations used, which produce slightly super-Alfvénic dense cores, are representative of the physical conditions in the Orion ISF.

What would settle it

A set of observed (μ, σ) values in the Orion ISF that lies outside the distribution produced by any viewing angle of the sub-Alfvénic simulations, or a direct measurement of the line-of-sight field strength that contradicts the sub-Alfvénic regime.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.30089 by Feiyu Quan, Hua-bai Li, Keping Qiu, Xiaodan Fan, Yitao Xu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Two cases of selected dense cores and the magnetic field lines that pass through them from two different viewing angles, cut from two different sub-regions in one of our simulations towards the end of Phase II (the collapsing phase). Red field lines indicate that they pass through dense regions with volume density > 5 × 104 H2 cm−3 , while the blue field lines pass through diffuse gas with volume density <… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: An illustration showing the diversity of observed 2D plane-of-sky dispersion of B-field orientations (left panel, L. Wang et al. 2024), made possible by the various 3D angle θcore on small scales for different cores in a simulated molecular cloud (right panel, Y. Zhang et al. 2019). On the right panel, the five cores are identified from a simulation at increasing levels of volume density thresholds and cor… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The spherical coordinate system used in this work [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The six observed sets of offset angles from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The six observed data-points of Orion ISF (J. Wu et al. 2024) in (µ, σ) space and the best fit probability distributions (at two different scale ranges) generated from a MHD simulation at θ = 35◦ , ϕ = −18◦ . The lower limit of the colorbar is set at 10−6 to allow more contrast between regions with high and low probability densities. The errorbars of the CARMA and JCMT data-points are calculated by error p… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Likelihoods for the different projections angles of the observed polarization maps over the whole (θ, ϕ) space (left panel), and in a small zoom-in region where we execute our numerical optimizations (right panel). Lower NLL value (larger likelihood) means that the observed polarization maps from Orion ISF are more likely to have those projection angles. To enhance visual contrast, in the left panel all th… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Additional hypothesis testing results from two more simulation seeds, illustrating the MMD p-values for different projection angles. of magnetic field in molecular clouds. With that said, at the scale of observed dense cores probed by JCMT and CARMA, non-ideal MHD effects such as turbulence-driven ambipolar diffusion (AD) (H.-b. Li & M. Houde 2008; K. S. Tang et al. 2018) could already start to play an imp… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: An example of simulated distribution in (µ, σ) space created by aggregating many different samples in ϕ at θ = 35◦ . Made from simulation seed 1234 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_13.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Dust polarization observations are widely used to diagnose the relative importance of magnetic fields and turbulence in star forming molecular clouds, often through summary statistics such as the mean polarization direction $\mu$ and dispersion $\sigma$. Recent multi-scale polarization observations of the Orion Integral-Shaped Filament (ISF) reveal substantial diversity in polarization morphology among its dense cores, raising questions about the underlying Alfv\'enic nature of the cloud. In this work, we develop a statistical framework to compare polarization-based summary statistics from observations with those derived from projected three dimensional MHD simulations, explicitly accounting for projection effects. Using globally sub-Alfv\'enic simulations that naturally produce slightly super-Alfv\'enic dense cores, we show that modest deviations of core-scale magnetic fields from the parent cloud field, when combined with projection, can generate a wide range of plane-of-sky polarization dispersions. Applying hypothesis testing, we find that the observed $(\mu, \sigma)$ values in the Orion ISF are statistically consistent with sub-Alfv\'enic cloud models over a broad range of viewing angles. This broad degeneracy implies that $\mu$ and $\sigma$ alone cannot provide precise information about the three-dimensional magnetic-field distribution, and hence the Alfv\'en Mach number, of an individual cloud. While the observations can provide evidence against certain projection geometries, we demonstrate that polarization statistics based solely on $(\mu, \sigma)$ are insufficient to provide evidence against sub-Alfv\'enic cloud models. Our results highlight the necessity of explicitly incorporating projection effects when interpreting polarization observations of molecular clouds.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper develops a statistical framework comparing observed polarization summary statistics (mean direction μ and dispersion σ) in the Orion Integral-Shaped Filament with those obtained by projecting globally sub-Alfvénic MHD simulations that naturally yield slightly super-Alfvénic dense cores. It applies hypothesis testing across a range of viewing angles and concludes that the Orion ISF (μ, σ) values are statistically consistent with these sub-Alfvénic models, implying that μ and σ alone cannot rule out sub-Alfvénic conditions because of projection-induced degeneracy in the plane-of-sky field orientation.

Significance. If the central consistency result holds, the work provides a clear demonstration that projection effects must be explicitly modeled before using simple polarization statistics to diagnose the Alfvén Mach number of a cloud. The hypothesis-testing approach on projected simulation outputs is a methodological strength that moves beyond qualitative visual comparison. The finding that modest core-scale field deviations combined with viewing angle can reproduce the observed diversity in core polarizations is a useful caution for the field.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (hypothesis-testing framework): the claim that the observed (μ, σ) values are statistically consistent with sub-Alfvénic models rests on the specific globally sub-Alfvénic runs being representative of Orion ISF conditions. The paper should include explicit sensitivity tests (varying turbulence driving mechanism, sonic Mach number distribution, or initial B-field geometry) to show that the projected (μ, σ) range and the resulting degeneracy are robust; without this, the generalization that (μ, σ) alone cannot provide evidence against sub-Alfvénic models is not yet load-bearing.
  2. [§3] §3 (viewing-angle sampling): the breadth of the degeneracy is quantified by sampling viewing angles, but the manuscript does not report the precise prior or grid used for the angle distribution nor the number of independent lines of sight per angle. This directly affects the p-value thresholds in the hypothesis test and therefore the strength of the consistency statement.
minor comments (1)
  1. The notation for the polarization dispersion σ should be clarified in the methods section to distinguish between the dispersion of polarization angles versus the dispersion of polarization vectors; the current usage is consistent within the paper but could be ambiguous to readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments and positive assessment of the work's significance. We address each major comment below. We agree that the viewing-angle sampling details must be reported explicitly and will revise the manuscript to include them. For the hypothesis-testing robustness, we provide justification for our simulation choices and will incorporate limited additional discussion and tests.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (hypothesis-testing framework): the claim that the observed (μ, σ) values are statistically consistent with sub-Alfvénic models rests on the specific globally sub-Alfvénic runs being representative of Orion ISF conditions. The paper should include explicit sensitivity tests (varying turbulence driving mechanism, sonic Mach number distribution, or initial B-field geometry) to show that the projected (μ, σ) range and the resulting degeneracy are robust; without this, the generalization that (μ, σ) alone cannot provide evidence against sub-Alfvénic models is not yet load-bearing.

    Authors: The simulations used are globally sub-Alfvénic MHD runs that self-consistently produce slightly super-Alfvénic dense cores while matching key observed properties of the Orion ISF (column density and velocity dispersion ranges). The central result demonstrates that projection effects combined with modest core-scale field deviations can reproduce the observed (μ, σ) diversity even under globally sub-Alfvénic conditions, establishing the existence of a degeneracy. We acknowledge that broader sensitivity tests across driving mechanisms and sonic Mach numbers would increase robustness. In revision we will add a dedicated paragraph justifying the representativeness of the chosen runs (citing prior validation against Orion-like conditions) and will include one additional projection test with altered initial B-field geometry. This is a partial revision. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§3] §3 (viewing-angle sampling): the breadth of the degeneracy is quantified by sampling viewing angles, but the manuscript does not report the precise prior or grid used for the angle distribution nor the number of independent lines of sight per angle. This directly affects the p-value thresholds in the hypothesis test and therefore the strength of the consistency statement.

    Authors: We agree that these procedural details are required for full reproducibility and proper interpretation of the hypothesis tests. In the revised manuscript we will explicitly state the prior distribution over viewing angles, the angular grid employed, and the number of independent lines of sight generated per angle, together with the method used to compute the projected polarization statistics and p-values. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: external simulations and independent statistical test

full rationale

The paper selects globally sub-Alfvénic MHD simulations (external to the Orion observations), projects them over viewing angles to produce (μ, σ) distributions, and applies hypothesis testing to check consistency with the observed Orion ISF values. No equations reduce by construction to fitted parameters from the target data, no self-definitional loops exist, and no load-bearing self-citations or imported uniqueness theorems are invoked in the provided text. The central claim of statistical consistency and degeneracy is a direct output of the simulation-to-observation comparison, not a renaming or ansatz smuggling. This is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard MHD assumptions plus the representativeness of the chosen simulation suite; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • global Alfvén Mach number
    Chosen sub-Alfvénic for the parent cloud in the simulations
  • viewing angle range
    Varied across possible orientations to test statistical consistency
axioms (2)
  • standard math MHD equations accurately describe the dynamics of molecular clouds
    Invoked when running the simulations
  • domain assumption Dust polarization traces the plane-of-sky component of the magnetic field
    Standard assumption when deriving μ and σ from observations

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5829 in / 1455 out tokens · 31338 ms · 2026-06-30T05:03:45.275984+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages · 12 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    yt: A Multi-code Analysis Toolkit for Astrophysical Simulation Data. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/9 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/9

  2. [2]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , abstract =

    Cao, Zhuo and Li, Hua-bai , title =. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , abstract =. 2023 , month =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acc5e8 , url =

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acc5e8 2023

  3. [3]

    and Ward-Thompson, Derek and Pattle, Kate and Johnstone, Doug and Koch, Patrick M

    Wu, Jintai and Qiu, Keping and Poidevin, Frédérick and Bastien, Pierre and Liu, Junhao and Ching, Tao-Chung and Bourke, Tyler L. and Ward-Thompson, Derek and Pattle, Kate and Johnstone, Doug and Koch, Patrick M. and Arzoumanian, Doris and Lee, Chang Won and Fanciullo, Lapo and Onaka, Takashi and Hwang, Jihye and Gouellec, Valentin J. M. Le and Soam, Archa...

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad93d2 2024

  4. [4]

    Malicious User Experience Design Research for Cybersecurity

    Theory of Star Formation. , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110602 , archivePrefix =. 0707.3514 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110602

  5. [5]

    TADPOL: A 1.3 mm Survey of Dust Polarization in Star-forming Cores and Regions

    TADPOL: A 1.3 mm Survey of Dust Polarization in Star-forming Cores and Regions. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/213/1/13 , archivePrefix =. 1310.6653 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0067-0049/213/1/13

  6. [6]

    Galaxies , keywords =

    Magnetic Fields in Molecular Clouds Observation and Interpretation. Galaxies , keywords =. doi:10.3390/galaxies9020041 , archivePrefix =. 2106.08172 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.3390/galaxies9020041

  7. [7]

    Observational Constraints on the Ages of Molecular Clouds and the Star-Formation Timescale: Ambipolar-Diffusion--Controlled or Turbulence-Induced Star Formation?

    Observational Constraints on the Ages of Molecular Clouds and the Star Formation Timescale: Ambipolar-Diffusion-controlled or Turbulence-induced Star Formation?. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/500125 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0512043 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/500125

  8. [8]

    Control of star formation by supersonic turbulence

    Control of star formation by supersonic turbulence. Reviews of Modern Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.76.125 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0301093 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/revmodphys.76.125

  9. [9]

    Anchoring Magnetic Field in Turbulent Molecular Clouds

    Anchoring Magnetic Field in Turbulent Molecular Clouds. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/704/2/891 , archivePrefix =. 0908.1549 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-637x/704/2/891

  10. [10]

    Anchoring Magnetic Fields in Turbulent Molecular Clouds. II. From 0.1 to 0.01 pc. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaf57c , archivePrefix =. 1901.03964 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaf57c 1901

  11. [11]

    Simulating Radiating and Magnetized Flows in Multi-Dimensions with ZEUS-MP

    Simulating Radiating and Magnetized Flows in Multiple Dimensions with ZEUS-MP. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/504594 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0511545 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/504594

  12. [12]

    Velocity Anisotropy in Self-gravitating Molecular Clouds. I. Simulation. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/95 , archivePrefix =. 1701.01806 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/95

  13. [13]

    Ade, P. A. R. and Aghanim, N. and Alina, D. and Alves, M. I. R. and Armitage-Caplan, C. and Arnaud, M. and Arzoumanian, D. and Ashdown, M. and Atrio-Barandela, F. and Aumont, J. and Baccigalupi, C. and Banday, A. J. and Barreiro, R. B. and Battaner, E. and Benabed, K. and Benoit-Lévy, A. and Bernard, J.-P. and Bersanelli, M. and Bielewicz, P. and Bock, J....

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424082

  14. [14]

    Polarization Holes as an Indicator of Magnetic Field‑Angular Momentum Alignment. I. Initial Tests. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad3734 , archivePrefix =. 2403.15280 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad3734

  15. [15]

    and Haberland, Matt and Reddy, Tyler and Cournapeau, David and Burovski, Evgeni and Peterson, Pearu and Weckesser, Warren and Bright, Jonathan and

    Virtanen, Pauli and Gommers, Ralf and Oliphant, Travis E. and Haberland, Matt and Reddy, Tyler and Cournapeau, David and Burovski, Evgeni and Peterson, Pearu and Weckesser, Warren and Bright, Jonathan and. Nature Methods , year =

  16. [16]

    Measurement of Areas on a Sphere Using Fibonacci and Latitude–Longitude Lattices , volume=

    Gonzalez, Alvaro , year=. Measurement of Areas on a Sphere Using Fibonacci and Latitude–Longitude Lattices , volume=. Mathematical Geosciences , publisher=. doi:10.1007/s11004-009-9257-x , number=

    work page doi:10.1007/s11004-009-9257-x

  17. [17]

    W., Lang, D., et al.\ 2013, , 125, 306

    Foreman-Mackey, Daniel and Hogg, David W. and Lang, Dustin and Goodman, Jonathan , year=. <tt>emcee</tt>: The MCMC Hammer , volume=. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific , publisher=. doi:10.1086/670067 , number=

    work page doi:10.1086/670067

  18. [18]

    , keywords =

    Bayesian Revisit of the Relationship between the Total Field Strength and the Volume Density of Interstellar Clouds. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab672b , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab672b

  19. [19]

    2003 , eprint=

    A new test for the multivariate two-sample problem based on the concept of minimum energy , author=. 2003 , eprint=

    2003

  20. [20]

    Borgwardt and Malte J

    Arthur Gretton and Karsten M. Borgwardt and Malte J. Rasch and Bernhard Sch. A Kernel Two-Sample Test , journal =. 2012 , volume =

    2012

  21. [21]

    and Burkhart, Blakesley and Lazarian, A

    Tofflemire, Benjamin M. and Burkhart, Blakesley and Lazarian, A. , year=. INTERSTELLAR SONIC AND ALFVÉNIC MACH NUMBERS AND THE TSALLIS DISTRIBUTION , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal , publisher=. doi:10.1088/0004-637x/736/1/60 , number=

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/736/1/60

  22. [22]

    Planck intermediate results. XXXV. Probing the role of the magnetic field in the formation of structure in molecular clouds. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525896 , archivePrefix =. 1502.04123 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525896

  23. [23]

    Self-similar Fragmentation Regulated by Magnetic Fields in a Massive Star Forming Filament

    Self-similar fragmentation regulated by magnetic fields in a region forming massive stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/nature14291 , archivePrefix =. 1510.07094 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1038/nature14291

  24. [24]

    The Journal of Open Source Software , keywords =

    PyVista: 3D plotting and mesh analysis through a streamlined interface for the Visualization Toolkit (VTK). The Journal of Open Source Software , keywords =. doi:10.21105/joss.01450 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.21105/joss.01450

  25. [25]

    The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =

    Yuan, Shibo and Li, Hua-bai , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ade5b6 , url =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ade5b6 2025

  26. [26]

    , keywords =

    Star formation in molecular clouds: observation and theory. , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.25.090187.000323 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.25.090187.000323

  27. [27]

    , keywords =

    Equation versus AI: Predicting Density and Measuring Width of Molecular Clouds by Multiscale Decomposition. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae3377 , archivePrefix =. 2508.01130 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae3377

  28. [28]

    Probing the Turbulence Dissipation Range and Magnetic Field Strengths in Molecular Clouds. II. Directly Probing the Ion-neutral Decoupling Scale. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aacb82 , archivePrefix =. 1901.06289 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aacb82 1901

  29. [29]

    , keywords =

    The Jeans Condition: A New Constraint on Spatial Resolution in Simulations of Isothermal Self-gravitational Hydrodynamics. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/310975 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/310975

  30. [30]

    Probing the Turbulence Dissipation Range and Magnetic Field Strengths in Molecular Clouds

    Probing the Turbulence Dissipation Range and Magnetic Field Strengths in Molecular Clouds. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/529581 , archivePrefix =. 0801.2757 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/529581

  31. [31]

    , keywords =

    Ambipolar diffusion and the mass-to-flux ratio in a turbulent collapsing cloud. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554422 , archivePrefix =. 2505.20391 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554422

  32. [32]

    Magnetic field

    Projection-angle effects when ``observing'' a turbulent magnetized collapsing molecular cloud: II. Magnetic field. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453265 , archivePrefix =. 2503.01971 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453265

  33. [33]

    2000 , month =

    Basu, Shantanu , title =. 2000 , month =. doi:10.1086/312885 , url =

    work page doi:10.1086/312885 2000

  34. [34]

    , keywords =

    The JCMT BISTRO Survey: Magnetic Fields Associated with a Network of Filaments in NGC 1333. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aba1e2 , archivePrefix =. 2007.00176 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aba1e2 2007

  35. [35]

    , year = 2015, month = aug, volume =

    Interstellar Dust Grain Alignment. , year = 2015, month = aug, volume =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122414 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122414 2015

  36. [36]

    J., Jing, Y

    Hydromagnetic waves in weakly-ionized media - I. Basic theory, and application to interstellar molecular clouds. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18817.x , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18817.x 2011

  37. [37]

    Radiative transfer with POLARIS. I. Analysis of magnetic fields through synthetic dust continuum polarization measurements. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424930 , archivePrefix =. 1604.05305 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424930

  38. [38]

    , year = 1983, month = sep, volume =

    The determination of cloud masses and dust characteristics from submillimetre thermal emission. , year = 1983, month = sep, volume =

    1983

  39. [39]

    RAS Techniques and Instruments , keywords =

    Scorpio: a two-fluid code for ambipolar diffusion simulations informed by recent observational constraints. RAS Techniques and Instruments , keywords =. doi:10.1093/rasti/rzaf054 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1093/rasti/rzaf054

  40. [40]

    Protostars and Planets VII , year = 2023, editor =

    Magnetic Fields in Star Formation: from Clouds to Cores. Protostars and Planets VII , year = 2023, editor =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2203.11179 , archivePrefix =. 2203.11179 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.11179 2023

  41. [41]

    From Polarimetry Instrument to Polarimetry Observation , author =

  42. [42]

    Breakthroughs in Statistics: Methodology and distribution , pages=

    Statistical Methods for Research Workers , author=. Breakthroughs in Statistics: Methodology and distribution , pages=. 1970 , publisher=

    1970

  43. [43]

    1972 , series =

    2 - DESCRIPTIVE MEASURES , booktitle =. 1972 , series =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-471150-1.50008-X , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-471150-1.50008-x 1972

  44. [44]

    and Kirby, Larry and Dotson, Jessie L

    Hildebrand, Roger H. and Kirby, Larry and Dotson, Jessie L. and Houde, Martin and Vaillancourt, John E. , title =. 2009 , month =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/696/1/567 , url =

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/696/1/567 2009

  45. [45]

    Physical Review , year = 1951, month = mar, volume =

    The Strength of Interstellar Magnetic Fields. Physical Review , year = 1951, month = mar, volume =. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.81.890.2 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.81.890.2 1951

  46. [46]

    , year = 1953, month = jul, volume =

    Magnetic Fields in Spiral Arms. , year = 1953, month = jul, volume =. doi:10.1086/145731 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/145731 1953

  47. [47]

    Pubblicazioni del R istituto superiore di scienze economiche e commericiali di firenze , volume=

    Teoria statistica delle classi e calcolo delle probabilita , author=. Pubblicazioni del R istituto superiore di scienze economiche e commericiali di firenze , volume=