Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Identification/Segmentation of Indian Regional Languages with Singular Value Decomposition based Feature Embedding

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2005.08229 v1 pith:CMFJ7RCS submitted 2020-05-17 eess.AS cs.SD

classification eess.AScs.SD
keywords languagefeatureidentificationsegmentationsingularvaluecontextn-gram
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

language identification (LID) is identifing a language in a given spoken utterance. Language segmentation is equally inportant as language identification where language boundaries can be spotted in a multi language utterance. In this paper, we have experimented with two schemes for language identification in Indian regional language context as very few works has been done. Singular value based feature embedding is used for both of the schemes. In first scheme, the singular value decomposition (SVD) is applied to the n-gram utterance matrix and in the second scheme, SVD is applied on the difference supervector matrix space. We have observed that in both the schemes, 55-65% singular value energy is sufficient to capture the language context. In n-gram based feature representation, we have seen that different skipgram models capture different language context. We have observed that for short test duration, supervector based feature representation is better but with a longer duration test signal, n-gram based feature performed better. We have also extended our work to explore language-based segmentation where we have seen that segmentation accuracy of four language group with ten language training model, scheme-1 has performed well but with same four language training model, scheme-2 outperformed scheme-1

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools