REVIEW 2 cited by
Observing patchy reionization with future CMB polarization experiments
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
We study the signal from patchy reionization in view of the future high accuracy polarization measurements of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB). We implement an extraction procedure of the patchy reionization signal analogous to CMB lensing. We evaluate the signal to noise ratio (SNR) for the future Stage IV (S4) CMB experiment. The signal has a broad peak centered on the degree angular scales, with a long tail at higher multipoles. The CMB S4 experiment can effectively constrain the properties of reionization by measuring the signal on degree scales. The signal amplitude depends on the properties of the structure determining the reionization morphology. We describe bubbles having radii distributed log-normally. The expected S/N is sensitive to the mean bubble radius: $\bar{R}=5$ Mpc implies $S/N \approx 4$, $\bar{R}=10$ Mpc implies $S/N \approx 20$. The spread of the radii distribution strongly affects the integrated SNR, that changes by a factor of $10^2$ when $\sigma_{lnr}$ goes from $\ln 2$ to $\ln3$. Future CMB experiments will thus place important constraints on the physics of reionization.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Mapping the gas density with the kinematic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich and patchy screening effects: a self-consistent comparison
A 7.2-sigma kSZ detection and a 4.1-sigma patchy screening signal around DESI LRGs, with the screening signal attributed mostly to CMB lensing, leaving a 95% upper limit tau < 2.5e-4 for the gas optical depth.
-
The Cosmic Microwave Background -- Secondary Anisotropies
A comprehensive review of the physics, observational status, and future prospects of CMB secondary anisotropies, containing no new results.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.