Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 67 references

A model for heat generation by acoustic waves in piezoelectric materials: Global large-data solutions

T0 review · 1 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that temperature-dependent elasticity in a Kelvin-Voigt thermo-acoustic system does not obstruct global-in-time generalized solutions for arbitrary initial data.

desk verdict Global large-data existence for thermoviscoelasticity with temperature-dependent coefficients is real; the proof is coherent and the boundedness assumptions are explicit, so send it to peer review. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.14900 v1 pith:CPHS675I submitted 2024-11-22 math.AP

Leander Claes , Johannes Lankeit , Michael Winkler This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35D9935L0574F0574J10
keywords thermoviscoelasticityKelvin-Voigtmodelacousticwaveheatingtemperature-dependentelasticityglobalgeneralizedsolutionslargedatapiezoelectricceramicsquadraticheatsource
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves that a Kelvin-Voigt model of acoustic waves generating heat in a solid, with elasticity tensors that depend on temperature, admits global-in-time solutions for arbitrarily large initial data. Previous global results for such thermoviscoelastic systems required the elastic coefficients to be constant, because constancy gives an exact energy-dissipation identity. Here that identity is lost, so the paper introduces a generalized notion of solution in which the temperature equation is replaced by two inequalities, and it shows that smooth approximating solutions converge to such a generalized solution. The result matters for piezoelectric ceramics, whose stiffness measurably changes with temperature and whose resonant heating can push them toward their Curie point. If correct, it says that temperature-dependent stiffness alone does not prevent a global solution; the price is a weaker solution concept and boundedness and uniform-ellipticity assumptions on the tensors.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the localized energy functional $F=\frac12|u_t|^2+\frac{\kappa}{2}|\nabla u|^2+\lambda\Theta$, for suitably chosen constants $\kappa>0$, $\lambda>0$, and $\mu>0$. Around this functional the authors build a generalized solution concept whose third requirement, (2.5), is a one-sided integrated inequality that is an identity along classical trajectories. To pass from parabolic regularizations to the limit, the proof uses weak lower-semicontinuity lemmas (Lemmas 6.3, 6.4, and 6.6) for expressions of the form $\langle B(z):\nabla w,\nabla w\rangle$, obtained by representing the positive tensor $B$ through its square root and applying a Lebesgue-type product-convergence lemma. The regularized problem (2.12) adds $-\varepsilon\Delta^2 v$ to the velocity equation and $\varepsilon\Delta u$ to the displacement equation, which supplies enough smoothing for each approximate solution to be global (Lemma 4.2) and for the compactness extraction in Lemma 7.3.

What would settle it

Run the regularized scheme (2.12) in $n=1$ with a bounded, uniformly elliptic, $C^2$ law such as $\gamma(\Theta)=\Gamma(\Theta)=1+0.5\sin^2(\Theta)$, large initial data such as $u_0=0$, $u_{0t}=M\sin(\pi x)$, $\Theta_0=1$, and check whether the uniform estimates (3.8)-(3.12) and (5.1)-(5.6) hold on a fixed time interval; any violation, or finite-time overflow of the temperature in the limit, would contradict Theorem 1.1. The same test with the bounded exponential law (8.34) and parameters chosen so that $C$ stays within a fixed positive range would show whether the observed overflow is numerical or physical.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 1.1: for bounded $C^2$ symmetric tensors $\gamma$ and $\Gamma$ that are uniformly positive definite at every temperature, and for initial data $u_0\in W^{1,2}_0(\Omega;\mathbb{R}^n)$, $u_{0t}\in L^2(\Omega;\mathbb{R}^n)$, and nonnegative $\Theta_0\in L^1(\Omega;\mathbb{R})$, the problem (1.6) has a global generalized solution in the sense of Definition 2.1 on any bounded smooth domain. The solution satisfies $u\in L^\infty_{\mathrm{loc}}([0,\infty);W^{1,2}_0(\Omega;\mathbb{R}^n))$, $\Theta\in L^\infty_{\mathrm{loc}}([0,\infty);L^1(\Omega))$ with the stated additional $L^q$ and $W^{1,r}$ integrability, and $u_t\in L^\infty_{\mathrm{loc}}([0,\infty);L^2(\Omega;\mathbb{R}^n))\cap L^2_{\mathrm{loc}}([0,\infty);W^{1,2}_0(\Omega;\mathbb{R}^n))$. The discovery is that global solvability survives the loss of the energy identity (1.7) caused by temperature dependence: the generalized concept requires the wave equation weakly, the heat equation as a one-sided inequality (2.4), and a localized energy-dissipation inequality (2.5) built around the coupled functional $F=\frac12|u_t|^2+\frac{\kappa}{2}|\nabla u|^2+\lambda\Theta$.

Load-bearing premise

The proof needs both elasticity tensors $\gamma$ and $\Gamma$ to be bounded, $C^2$, and uniformly positive definite at every temperature, with the symmetries in (1.9)-(1.11); if stiffness can grow without bound or lose positive definiteness, the theorem says nothing, and the paper's own unbounded power-law simulations overflow for large $k$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any bounded smooth domain and any finite-energy initial data, temperature-dependent elasticity tensors that stay bounded and uniformly elliptic do not cause finite-time blow-up in the generalized sense.
  • The generalized solution concept is consistent with classical solvability: for sufficiently regular data and solutions, the two inequalities collapse to the original system in the classical sense (Proposition 2.2).
  • The heat-production rate $\langle\Gamma(\Theta):\nabla_s u_t,\nabla_s u_t\rangle$ only needs to be controlled in $L^1$; the theory does not rely on temperature-dependent heat capacity or on additional inelastic variables, unlike several earlier constructions.
  • In the one-dimensional resonator simulations, temperature-dependent stiffness shifts the resonance frequency and changes the temperature growth from superlinear to sublinear; steep temperature dependence can produce hot spots or numerical overflow, which the paper leaves as an open question.
  • If the bounded exponential law (8.34) is used, forcing the elasticity to remain within a fixed positive range, the same qualitative detuning behavior appears, suggesting that the core mechanism is robust as long as the boundedness assumptions hold.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the boundedness or uniform-ellipticity assumptions fail, as they do for the unbounded power law (8.33), Theorem 1.1 gives no information; a natural next step is to ask whether generalized solutions persist under one-sided or unbounded stiffness laws, or whether singularities can actually occur.
  • The one-sided inequality technique may transfer to other wave-heat systems with $L^1$ temperatures and quadratic sources, such as thermoelasticity including thermal expansion, where the favorable energy identity is also lost.
  • The hot-spot patterns reported for steep temperature dependence suggest a mechanism worth testing experimentally: if real, they would imply that even ideal cooling cannot stabilize high-power piezoelectric transducers once stiffness rises steeply with temperature; if purely numerical, they still motivate better-posed regularizations.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper studies the initial-boundary value problem (1.6) for a Kelvin-Voigt thermoviscoelastic system with temperature-dependent elasticity tensors γ(Θ), Γ(Θ). The main result, Theorem 1.1, asserts global existence of generalized solutions for arbitrary large finite-energy initial data in bounded smooth domains, under the assumptions that γ and Γ are bounded, C², symmetric, and uniformly positive definite. The generalized solution concept in Definition 2.1 consists of a weak formulation for the displacement, a one-sided inequality for the heat equation, and a localized energy dissipation inequality. The proof regularizes the system as (2.12), derives ε-independent estimates, proves global existence of approximate solutions, extracts limits via Aubin-Lions and compactness, and passes to the limit using the lower-semicontinuity lemmas of Section 6. Section 8 contains illustrative FDTD simulations of a one-dimensional resonator, including temperature-dependent elasticity laws that lie outside the theorem's hypotheses.

Significance. The result is significant: it provides a large-data global solvability statement for a model in which the classical Lyapunov structure (1.7) fails, and it introduces a generalized solution concept that is shown to coincide with classical solvability for smooth data (Proposition 2.2). The proof is detailed and largely self-contained; the a priori estimates in Sections 3–5 and the lower-semicontinuity machinery in Section 6 are coherent, and the parameter choices (7.16)–(7.18) are admissible. The paper is also honest about the limitations of the numerical section: it explicitly states that the power law (8.33) lies outside the hypotheses of Theorem 1.1. The main reservation is an algebraic sign inconsistency in the proof of the key energy inequality (2.5), which is correctable but must be fixed.

major comments (1)
  1. [Lemma 7.4, Eqs. (7.20)–(7.31)] There is an algebraic sign inconsistency in the central derivation of (2.5). In (7.20), the coefficient of ∫∫ |∇uε|² ζe^{-μt}ψ is −κμ/2, which is the coefficient correctly obtained from the time derivative of Fεζe^{-μt}. However, in (7.30) and in the liminf expression displayed before (7.31), the same coefficient appears as +κμ/2. The final inequality (2.5) requires the plus sign, and the proof can be repaired by multiplying (7.20) by −1 before the rearrangement, but this step is not stated and the chain of displayed equations as written is inconsistent. This is a load-bearing point in the proof of Theorem 1.1 and must be corrected.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Lemma 2.3] The displayed operator A has third row −⟨Γ(Θ):∇sv:∇s·⟩−D∆, which does not match the Θ-equation in (2.12), whose source is quadratic in ∇sv and contains no ∇sΘ term; please clarify the notation or correct the row.
  2. [Proposition 2.2] The sentence 'That u = 0 and Θ = 0 on Ω×(0,∞) immediately results...' should read 'on ∂Ω×(0,∞)' rather than 'on Ω×(0,∞)'.
  3. [Section 8] The power law (8.33) and the exponential law (8.34) with large b violate the boundedness assumption (1.8); although the text acknowledges this, it would be helpful to state explicitly that the numerical experiments are heuristic and are not intended as a numerical test of Theorem 1.1.
  4. [Eq. (7.31)] A plus sign appears to be missing before the term κ(a+2μ)/4 |∇u|² ζ(t)e^{-μt}ψ on the left-hand side of the displayed liminf inequality.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity identified: Theorem 1.1 is proved from the stated hypotheses by a self-contained approximation argument, and the numerical section is explicitly outside the theorem's assumptions.

full rationale

The claimed global existence result in Theorem 1.1 is derived from the stated hypotheses (1.8)-(1.14) via an approximation sequence (2.12). Each a priori estimate (Lemma 3.4, Lemmas 5.1-5.5, Lemmas 7.1-7.2) is obtained by testing the regularized equations, and the limit passage in Lemma 7.3 uses Aubin-Lions compactness, Vitali's theorem, Fatou's lemma, and the weak-lower-semicontinuity machinery of Section 6. The generalized solution concept in Definition 2.1 is not used as an input: the energy-dissipation inequality (2.5) is established for the limit in Lemma 7.4 by rearranging the dissipation terms in (7.30) and applying Lemmas 6.4 and 6.6 with constants chosen freely in (7.16)-(7.18). No parameter is fitted to data, and no result of the same authors is invoked as the target conclusion. Self-citations to [25], [30], and [62] concern technical tools or analogous solution concepts, but the supporting references [1], [17], [23], and [57] are external, and the arguments are carried out in the paper. The numerical section explicitly violates the boundedness assumptions with (8.33) and states that overflow may be numerical, so it does not disguise an empirical fit as a prediction. Overall, no circular step exists.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 9 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The proof introduces no fitted constants; kappa, lambda, and mu in Lemma 7.4 are proof parameters chosen to satisfy (7.16)-(7.18) and do not depend on data. Section 8's simulation parameters are exploratory and lie outside the theorem. No new physical entities are postulated; the generalized solution concept is a mathematical definition, not an invented entity.

assumptions (9)
  • standard math Amann's quasilinear parabolic existence theory ([1], Theorems 12.1 and 12.5)
    Used in Lemma 2.3 to obtain local classical solutions for the regularized system (2.12) and an extensibility criterion.
  • standard math Korn's inequality ([35], [29])
    Used in Lemma 3.4 to turn the dissipative term involving gamma into a bound on the full gradient of v_epsilon.
  • standard math Gagliardo-Nirenberg interpolation and Sobolev embedding
    Used in Lemmas 5.3, 5.4 and 4.1, 4.2 to convert weighted gradient bounds into Lebesgue and Sobolev bounds.
  • standard math Aubin-Lions compactness lemma ([57])
    Used in Lemma 7.3 to extract convergent subsequences of the approximate solutions.
  • standard math Analytic semigroup smoothing estimates and fractional power embeddings ([17], [23], [25])
    Used in Lemmas 4.1 and 4.2 to upgrade L^2 bounds to the W^{2+2eta,infty} estimates required by the extensibility criterion.
  • standard math Continuity and boundedness of positive definite matrix square roots ([24])
    Used in Lemma 6.2 to construct the square root of B for the lower-semicontinuity argument.
  • domain assumption Coefficient hypotheses (1.8)-(1.13): Omega smooth bounded; gamma and Gamma in C^2 intersect L^infty, symmetric, uniformly positive definite
    These are the physical modeling assumptions of temperature-dependent elasticity that the existence theorem covers; they are used throughout Sections 3-7 and are violated by the power-law numerics in Section 8.
  • domain assumption Initial data hypotheses (1.14): u0 in W^{1,2}_0, u0t in L^2, Theta0 in L^1 nonnegative
    Finite mechanical energy and finite L^1 temperature with no smallness condition; these are the 'large-data' conditions advertised in the title.
  • standard math Vitali convergence theorem and Fatou's lemma
    Used in Lemmas 7.3 and 7.4 to pass from almost everywhere convergence of Theta_epsilon to convergence of integrals and lower semicontinuity of weak limits.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A model for heat generation by acoustic waves in piezoelectric materials: Global large-data solutions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CPHS675I

@misc{pith2026241114900,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A model for heat generation by acoustic waves in piezoelectric materials: Global large-data solutions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CPHS675I}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.14900}
}
read the original abstract

A model for the generation of heat due to mechanical losses during acoustic wave propagation in a solid is considered in a Kelvin-Voigt type framework. In contrast to previous studies on related thermoviscoelastic models, in line with recent experimental findings the present manuscript focuses on situations in which elastic parameters depend on temperature. Despite an apparent loss of mathematically favorable structural properties thereby encountered, in the framework of a suitably generalized concept of solvability a result on global existence of solutions is derived under mild assumptions which, in particular, do not involve any smallness condition on the initial data.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.14900 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Measurement result for the temperature dependence of the elastic parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Typical result for the mean temperature and for the envelope of the mechanical oscillation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Results for the thermal field for coupled thermo-acoustic simulations of a one-dimensional [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    H. Amann. Nonhomogeneous linear and quasilinear elliptic and parabolic boundary value problems. InFunction spaces, differential operators and nonlinear analysis (Friedrichroda, 1992), volume 133 of Teubner-Texte Math., pages 9–126. Teubner, Stuttgart, 1993

    work page 1992

  2. [2]

    Bartels and T

    S. Bartels and T. Roubíček. Thermoviscoplasticity at small strains.ZAMM Z. Angew. Math. Mech., 88(9):735–754, 2008

    work page 2008

  3. [3]

    Bartels and T

    S. Bartels and T. Roubíček. Thermo-visco-elasticity with rate-independent plasticity in isotropic materials under- going thermal expansion.ESAIM Math. Model. Numer. Anal., 45(3):477–504, 2011

    work page 2011

  4. [4]

    Bartels and T

    S. Bartels and T. Roubíček. Numerical approaches to thermally coupled perfect plasticity.Numer. Methods Partial Differential Equations, 29(6):1837–1863, 2013

    work page 2013

  5. [5]

    P. M. Bies and T. Cieślak. Time-asymptotics of a heated string. 2024. arXiv:2405.04310

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Blanchard and O

    D. Blanchard and O. Guibé. Existence of a solution for a nonlinear system in thermoviscoelasticity.Adv. Differential Equations, 5(10-12):1221–1252, 2000

    work page 2000

  7. [7]

    Boley and J

    B. Boley and J. Weiner.Theory of Thermal Stresses. Dover Civil and Mechanical Engineering. Dover Publications, 2012

    work page 2012

  8. [8]

    Bonetti and G

    E. Bonetti and G. Bonfanti. Existence and uniqueness of the solution to a 3D thermoviscoelastic system.Electron. J. Differential Equations, pages No. 50, 15, 2003

    work page 2003

Show all 67 references
  1. [9]

    Chełmiński and S

    K. Chełmiński and S. Owczarek. Renormalised solutions in thermo-visco-plasticity for a Norton-Hoff type model. Part II: the limit case.Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl., 31:643–660, 2016

    2016

  2. [10]

    Chełmiński and S

    K. Chełmiński and S. Owczarek. Renormalized solutions in thermo-visco-plasticity for a Norton-Hoff type model. Part I: the truncated case.Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl., 28:140–152, 2016

    2016

  3. [11]

    Cieślak, M

    T. Cieślak, M. Galić, and B. Muha. A model in one-dimensional thermoelasticity.Nonlinear Anal., 216:Paper No. 112703, 21, 2022

    2022

  4. [12]

    Cieślak, B

    T. Cieślak, B. Muha, and S. a. Trifunović. Global weak solutions in nonlinear 3D thermoelasticity.Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations, 63(1):Paper No. 26, 36, 2024

    2024

  5. [13]

    Claes and M

    L. Claes and M. Webersen. pyfds 0.3.1 – modular field simulation tool, 2024. 39

    2024

  6. [14]

    C. M. Dafermos and L. Hsiao. Global smooth thermomechanical processes in one-dimensional nonlinear thermovis- coelasticity. Nonlinear Anal., 6(5):435–454, 1982

    1982

  7. [15]

    Developmentofsingularitiesinsolutionsoftheequationsofnonlinearthermoelasticity

    C.M.DafermosandL.Hsiao. Developmentofsingularitiesinsolutionsoftheequationsofnonlinearthermoelasticity. Quart. Appl. Math., 44(3):463–474, 1986

    1986

  8. [16]

    Feldmann, V

    N. Feldmann, V. Schulze, L. Claes, B. Jurgelucks, L. Meihost, A. Walther, and B. Henning. Modelling damping in piezoceramics: A comparative study.tm - Technisches Messen, 88(5):294–302, 2021

    2021

  9. [17]

    Friedman

    A. Friedman. Partial differential equations. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., New York-Montreal, Que.-London, 1969

    1969

  10. [18]

    Friesen, L

    O. Friesen, L. Claes, C. Scheidemann, N. Feldmann, T. Hemsel, and B. Henning. Estimation of temperature- dependent piezoelectric material parameters using ring-shaped specimens. In2023 International Congress on Ul- trasonics, Beijing, China, volume 2822, page 012125. IOP Publi...

    2024

  11. [19]

    Gawinecki

    J. Gawinecki. Global existence of solutions for non-small data to non-linear spherically symmetric thermoviscoelas- ticity. Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 26(11):907–936, 2003

    2003

  12. [20]

    J. A. Gawinecki and W. M. Zaj¸ aczkowski. Global regular solutions to two-dimensional thermoviscoelasticity.Com- mun. Pure Appl. Anal., 15(3):1009–1028, 2016

    2016

  13. [21]

    J. A. Gawinecki and W. M. Zaj¸ aczkowski. On regular solutions to two-dimensional thermoviscoelasticity.Appl. Math. (Warsaw), 43(2):207–233, 2016

    2016

  14. [22]

    Gutierrez-Lemini

    D. Gutierrez-Lemini. Engineering Viscoelasticity. Springer US, Boston, MA and s.l., 2014

    2014

  15. [23]

    Henry.Geometric theory of semilinear parabolic equations, volume 840 ofLecture Notes in Mathematics

    D. Henry.Geometric theory of semilinear parabolic equations, volume 840 ofLecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer- Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1981

    1981

  16. [24]

    N. J. Higham. Functions of matrices. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia, PA,

  17. [25]

    Horstmann and M

    D. Horstmann and M. Winkler. Boundedness vs. blow-up in a chemotaxis system. J. Differential Equations, 215(1):52–107, 2005

    2005

  18. [26]

    S. Jiang. Global existence of smooth solutions in one-dimensional nonlinear thermoelasticity. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A, 115(3-4):257–274, 1990

    1990

  19. [27]

    Jiang and R

    S. Jiang and R. Racke. On some quasilinear hyperbolic-parabolic initial-boundary value problems.Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 12(4):315–339, 1990

    1990

  20. [28]

    J. U. Kim. Global existence of solutions of the equations of one-dimensional thermoviscoelasticity with initial data in BV and L1. Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa Cl. Sci. (4), 10(3):357–427, 1983

    1983

  21. [29]

    A. Korn. Über einige Ungleichungen, welche in der Theorie der elastischen und elektrischen Schwingungen eine Rolle spielen. Krak. Anz., 705-724 (1909)., 1909

    1909

  22. [30]

    Lankeit and M

    J. Lankeit and M. Winkler. A generalized solution concept for the Keller-Segel system with logarithmic sensitivity: global solvability for large nonradial data.NoDEA Nonlinear Differential Equations Appl., 24(4):Paper No. 49, 33, 2017

    2017

  23. [31]

    G. A. Lesieutre, L. Fang, G. H. Koopmann, S. P. Pai, and S. Yoshikawa. Heat generation of a piezoceramic induced- strain actuator embedded in a glass/epoxy composite panel. In I. Chopra, editor,Smart Structures and Materials 1996: Smart Structures and Integrated Systems. SPIE, 5 1996

    1996

  24. [32]

    R. S. McIntire.A new technique for discussing the development of singularities in quasilinear hyperbolic PDE’s with applications to a model problem in nonlinear theormoelasticity (blow-up, catastrophe, breakdown). Brown University, 1985

    1985

  25. [33]

    M. A. Meyers and K. K. Chawla. Mechanical behavior of materials. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2 edition, 11 2008

    2008

  26. [34]

    Mielke and T

    A. Mielke and T. Roubíček. Thermoviscoelasticity in Kelvin-Voigt rheology at large strains.Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 238(1):1–45, 2020

    2020

  27. [35]

    P. Neff, D. Pauly, and K.-J. Witsch. Poincaré meets Korn via Maxwell: extending Korn’s first inequality to incompatible tensor fields.J. Differ. Equations, 258(4):1267–1302, 2015. 40

    2015

  28. [36]

    Nye.Physical Properties of Crystals: Their Representation by Tensors and Matrices

    J. Nye.Physical Properties of Crystals: Their Representation by Tensors and Matrices. Oxford science publications. Clarendon Press, 1985

    1985

  29. [37]

    Owczarek and K

    S. Owczarek and K. Wielgos. On a thermo-visco-elastic model with nonlinear damping forces andL1 temperature data. Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 46(9):9966–9999, 2023

    2023

  30. [38]

    Paoli and A

    L. Paoli and A. Petrov. Global existence result for thermoviscoelastic problems with hysteresis.Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl., 13(2):524–542, 2012

    2012

  31. [39]

    Paoli and A

    L. Paoli and A. Petrov. Thermodynamics of multiphase problems in viscoelasticity.GAMM-Mitt., 35(1):75–90, 2012

    2012

  32. [40]

    Pawłow and W

    I. Pawłow and W. M. Zaj¸ aczkowski. Global regular solutions to three-dimensional thermo-visco-elasticity with nonlinear temperature-dependent specific heat.Commun. Pure Appl. Anal., 16(4):1331–1371, 2017

    2017

  33. [41]

    PI Ceramic GmbH.Material Data – Specific parameters of the standard materials, 2023

    2023

  34. [42]

    Y. Qin. Global existence and asymptotic behaviour of the solution to the system in one-dimensional nonlinear thermoviscoelasticity. Quart. Appl. Math., 59(1):113–142, 2001

    2001

  35. [43]

    R. Racke. Initial boundary value problems in one-dimensional nonlinear thermoelasticity. Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 10(5):517–529, 1988

    1988

  36. [44]

    R. Racke. Blow-up in nonlinear three-dimensional thermoelasticity.Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 12(3):267–273, 1990

    1990

  37. [45]

    R. Racke. On the Cauchy problem in nonlinear3-d thermoelasticity.Math. Z., 203(4):649–682, 1990

    1990

  38. [46]

    Racke and S

    R. Racke and S. Zheng. Global existence and asymptotic behavior in nonlinear thermoviscoelasticity.J. Differential Equations, 134(1):46–67, 1997

    1997

  39. [47]

    R. F. Remis. On the stability of the finite-difference time-domain method. Journal of Computational Physics, 163(1):249–261, 9 2000

    2000

  40. [48]

    Rossi and T

    R. Rossi and T. Roubíček. Thermodynamics and analysis of rate-independent adhesive contact at small strains. Nonlinear Anal., 74(10):3159–3190, 2011

    2011

  41. [49]

    Rossi and T

    R. Rossi and T. Roubíček. Adhesive contact delaminating at mixed mode, its thermodynamics and analysis. Interfaces Free Bound., 15(1):1–37, 2013

    2013

  42. [50]

    Roubíček

    T. Roubíček. Thermo-visco-elasticity at small strains withL1-data. Quart. Appl. Math., 67(1):47–71, 2009

    2009

  43. [51]

    Roubíček

    T. Roubíček. Thermodynamics of rate-independent processes in viscous solids at small strains. SIAM J. Math. Anal., 42(1):256–297, 2010

    2010

  44. [52]

    Roubíček

    T. Roubíček. Nonlinearly coupled thermo-visco-elasticity. NoDEA Nonlinear Differential Equations Appl. , 20(3):1243–1275, 2013

    2013

  45. [53]

    Roubíček

    T. Roubíček. Thermodynamics of perfect plasticity.Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S, 6(1):193–214, 2013

    2013

  46. [54]

    O. V. Rudenko, S. I. Solujan, and R. T. Beyer.Theoretical foundations of nonlinear acoustics. Studies in Soviet science. Consultants Bureau, New York, 1977

    1977

  47. [55]

    S. J. Rupitsch.Piezoelectric sensors and actuators. Springer, 2019

    2019

  48. [56]

    Y. Shibata. Global in time existence of small solutions of nonlinear thermoviscoelastic equations.Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 18(11):871–895, 1995

    1995

  49. [57]

    J. Simon. Compact sets in the spaceLp(0, T; B). Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4), 146:65–96, 1987

    1987

  50. [58]

    M. Slemrod. Global existence, uniqueness, and asymptotic stability of classical smooth solutions in one-dimensional nonlinear thermoelasticity.Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 76(2):97–133, 1981

    1981

  51. [59]

    T. R. Tauchert. Heat generation in a viscoelastic solid.Acta Mechanica, 3(4):385–396, 1967

    1967

  52. [60]

    C. A. Truesdell. Cauchy and the modern mechanics of continua. volume 45, pages 5–24. 1992. Études sur Cauchy (1789–1857)

    1992

  53. [61]

    Wellendorf, L

    A. Wellendorf, L. von Damnitz, A. Nuri, D. Anders, and S. Trampnau. Determination of the temperature-dependent resonance behavior of ultrasonic transducers using the finite-element method.Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies, pages 1–14, 2 2023. 41

    2023

  54. [62]

    M. Winkler. Global generalized solutions to a multi-dimensional doubly tactic resource consumption model account- ing for social interactions.Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 29(3):373–418, 2019

    2019

  55. [63]

    K. Yee. Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems involving Maxwell's equations in isotropic media. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 14(3):302–307, 5 1966

    1966

  56. [64]

    Yoshikawa, I

    S. Yoshikawa, I. Pawłow, and W. M. Zaj¸ aczkowski. Quasi-linear thermoelasticity system arising in shape memory materials. SIAM J. Math. Anal., 38(6):1733–1759, 2007

    2007

  57. [65]

    Yoshikawa, I

    S. Yoshikawa, I. Pawłow, and W. M. Zaj¸ aczkowski. A quasilinear thermoviscoelastic system for shape memory alloys with temperature dependent specific heat.Commun. Pure Appl. Anal., 8(3):1093–1115, 2009

    2009

  58. [66]

    Zheng, S

    J. Zheng, S. Takahashi, S. Yoshikawa, K. Uchino, and J. W. C. de Vries. Heat generation in multilayer piezoelectric actuators. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 79(12):3193–3198, 1996. 42

    1996

  59. [2008]

    Theory and computation

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.