Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 1 minor 61 references

High-Energy Photon Generation from Self-Organized Plasma Cavities in Field-Enhanced Laser-Preplasma Interactions

T0 review · 3 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Laser pulse converts 20% of its energy into gamma photons

desk verdict The submitted file is not the paper — the abstract describes a PIC gamma-ray study while the full text is an unrelated RAG tool paper; as it stands there is nothing to referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.06045 v1 pith:CS3MLVIL submitted 2025-08-08 physics.plasm-ph

Prokopis Hadjisolomou , Rashid Shaisultanon , Tae Moon Jeong , Christopher Paul Ridgers , Sergei Vladimirovich Bulanov This is my paper
classification physics.plasm-ph
keywords laser-plasmainteractiongamma-raygenerationparticle-in-cellsimulationradiationreactionrelativisticself-focusingnear-criticalplasmaNd:glasslaserphotonuclearphysics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that an ultraintense Nd:glass laser pulse striking a near-critical plasma self-organises into a highly efficient gamma-ray source. In 3D particle-in-cell simulations, relativistic self-focusing together with a self-generated electron cavity raises the local laser intensity by more than an order of magnitude, pushing electrons into a regime where they lose a substantial fraction of their energy as hard radiation. The reported result is a gamma-photon yield exceeding 20% of the laser energy, with emission strongest near 0.5 times the relativistic critical density. The paper also claims that Nd:glass pulses produce about ten times more gamma photons than equal-power Ti:Sa pulses, which would favour photonuclear applications. A flag: the full text supplied on the page is an unrelated paper on retrieval-augmented generation, so the simulation evidence is not available for inspection here.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the self-generated electron cavity: as the laser relativistically self-focuses in near-critical plasma, it expels electrons and creates a density-depleted channel. The cavity acts as a focusing structure that further amplifies the laser field, driving the radiated power into the radiation-reaction-dominated regime. The quantitative claim rests on the 3D particle-in-cell simulation tracking electron motion with radiation reaction included; 'radiation-reaction-dominated' means electrons lose a substantial part of their kinetic energy to hard photon emission.

What would settle it

A calibrated experiment that measures the total gamma-ray energy emitted when an ultraintense Nd:glass pulse interacts with a preformed near-critical plasma would settle the claim: if the measured conversion is far below 20% of the laser energy, the cavity-focusing enhancement described in the paper is not the dominant mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery, stated on its own terms, is that the interaction of an ultraintense Nd:glass laser with a near-critical plasma is dominated by a self-organizing feedback loop: the laser's relativistic self-focusing pushes electrons out of the axis, forming a cavity; the cavity in turn further focuses the laser, boosting intensity by more than an order of magnitude. At that boosted intensity the electrons radiate so strongly that radiation reaction—the back-reaction of emitted photons on the electron motion—becomes the dominant energy-loss channel. The system converts more than 20% of the laser energy into gamma photons, peaking near 0.5 times the relativistic critical density,

Load-bearing premise

The claim depends on 3D particle-in-cell simulations accurately representing electron energy loss by radiation and the spontaneous formation of the cavity—and on the assumed near-critical preplasma profile being experimentally achievable—with no simulation details available in the supplied text to verify those representations.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the conversion efficiency holds in experiment, a multi-petawatt Nd:glass laser would emit more than a fifth of its energy as gamma photons in a single pulse.
  • The same-power comparison implies Nd:glass lasers, not Ti:Sa, would be the preferred drivers for photonuclear physics experiments that need large gamma-photon numbers.
  • Because the mechanism is self-organizing, it may not require fine preplasma tuning, making the source robust and scalable to higher peak powers.
  • The near-critical density condition (around 0.5 times the relativistic critical density) gives a concrete target for target design in future experiments.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the cavity-focusing picture is right, the yield should depend strongly on pulse duration at fixed energy, since longer pulses allow more time for the cavity to form and self-focus to develop; this is a testable scaling that the paper implies but does not quantify.
  • A natural next simulation step would be to scan the preplasma density gradient and look for the width of the 'self-organizing' window; the paper does not report how robust the mechanism is to profile variations.
  • The same feedback loop might be exploitable in other wavelength or pulse-length regimes, e.g. with CO2 lasers or in gas-jets, provided the near-critical density condition can be met.
  • The order-of-magnitude advantage of Nd:glass over Ti:Sa is stated at the same power; the manuscript does not report the comparison at fixed energy, so the photon-count gain may be partly a pulse-duration effect.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The submission, under the title 'High-Energy Photon Generation from Self-Organized Plasma Cavities in Field-Enhanced Laser-Preplasma Interactions,' contains an abstract making quantitative claims about 3D particle-in-cell simulations of ultraintense laser-plasma interactions: >10x intensity enhancement, >20% laser-to-gamma conversion, and an order-of-magnitude advantage for Nd:glass over Ti:Sa pulses, with peak emission near 0.5 n_c. However, the full text of the manuscript is 'RAGTrace,' a computer-science paper on retrieval-augmented generation evaluation. There is no plasma-physics content anywhere in the body: no PIC code description, no equations, no simulation parameters, no numerical results, and no figures. The abstract's claims are therefore completely unsupported by the submitted artifact.

Significance. If the claimed physics were correct, the result would be highly significant: near-20% gamma conversion in laser-plasma interactions would represent a major advance for photonuclear applications and high-field physics. However, as submitted, there is no way to evaluate the scientific validity of these claims. The manuscript provides no simulation setup, no radiation-reaction model, no resolution/convergence information, no particle statistics, no benchmark data, and no reproducibility materials. The mismatch between the abstract and the body makes the submission not a plasma-physics paper at all. The asserted results are therefore not merely unverified but entirely unsupported.

major comments (3)
  1. [Full text] The body of the manuscript is the paper 'RAGTrace' (arXiv:2508.06056), a human-computer-interaction study about retrieval-augmented generation. It contains no equations, figures, or text relevant to laser-plasma physics. The central claim in the abstract, that 'Three-dimensional particle-in-cell simulations demonstrate...' a >20% gamma-photon yield, has no accompanying simulation description. No code, grid resolution, particle number, boundary conditions, or radiation-reaction formulation (e.g., Landau-Lifshitz or QED-corrected) is provided. This is a load-bearing absence: the central claim is entirely unsupported by the submitted artifact.
  2. [Abstract, 'gamma-photon yield exceeding 20%'] Even taking the abstract in isolation, the quantitative claims are unsupported. No simulation data, parameter scans, or error estimates are reported. The claimed peak near 0.5 n_c cannot be assessed for whether it is a physical optimum or a numerical artifact, and the 'order of magnitude increase' for Nd:glass relative to Ti:Sa has no associated calculation or experimental evidence. These are not minor omissions; they are the entire basis of the paper's central assertion.
  3. [Entire manuscript] The submission gives no evidence that the plasma-physics claims were derived by any method. In the absence of any derivation, code description, or data, the claims are unfalsifiable from this manuscript. A reader cannot distinguish a physical result from an artifact of an unstated radiation-reaction model or density ramp. This is a fundamental correctness-risk issue that cannot be resolved through local revision; the submitted text simply is not the claimed paper.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Metadata and title] The title, abstract, and author list of the plasma-physics abstract do not correspond to the full text's title ('RAGTrace'), author list, and subject area. The submission appears to contain a mismatched PDF. Even after replacing the body with the correct manuscript, the editorial office should verify that all pages belong to the same paper.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the abstract's central claims are unsupported by the absent simulation description, but there is no derivation chain that reduces to its own inputs.

full rationale

The manuscript as provided contains only an abstract describing 3D PIC simulations of laser-plasma interactions and a full text that is an unrelated paper on retrieval-augmented generation (RAGTrace). There are no equations, no simulation parameters, no fitted values, and no derivation chain in the artifact. The abstract's claims—such as 'Three-dimensional particle-in-cell simulations demonstrate that relativistic self-focusing... enhances the laser intensity by more than an order of magnitude' and 'a γ-photon yield exceeding 20% of the laser energy'—are not derivable from anything in the visible text; they are bare assertions pointing to simulations that are not described. This is a fundamental completeness and verifiability failure, not circularity. No parameter is fitted and then renamed as a prediction; no quantity is defined in terms of the quantity it is supposed to predict; no self-citation is invoked as load-bearing evidence; and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from prior work. The 'peak near 0.5 n_c' could have been selected from a scan, but the scan is not shown, so we cannot exhibit a by-construction reduction. Thus, while the abstract's central claim is entirely unsupported by the submitted artifact, it is not circular. The correct circularity score is therefore 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The quantitative claims (intensity enhancement >10x, gamma yield >20%, photon-number advantage for Nd:glass) rest on simulation inputs that are not stated in the abstract and on the fidelity of the PIC radiation-reaction modeling. The only scan-selected quantity visible from the abstract is the plasma density optimum near 0.5 n_c. No new physical entities are postulated: the electron cavity is an emergent simulation structure, not an invented particle, force, or dimension. None of these ledger entries can be verified because the manuscript body is an unrelated paper.

free parameters (2)
  • Plasma density scan around the relativistic critical density = optimum reported near 0.5 n_c
    The abstract states peak photon emission occurs near 0.5 times the relativistic critical density, which reads as the optimum of a density scan. The location and even the existence of this peak are contingent on the scan range and on all other fixed laser and plasma inputs, which are unstated in the artifact.
  • Laser pulse duration, intensity, and preplasma profile parameters = unstated
    The Nd:glass versus Ti:Sa comparison is a controlled variation, but the specific durations, intensities, focal geometry, and preplasma scale lengths that produce the claimed order-of-magnitude photon-number difference are hand-chosen inputs not given in the abstract.
assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption The PIC simulation code with its radiation-reaction model accurately describes electron dynamics at ultrahigh laser intensity.
    The central claim that the system enters the radiation-reaction-dominated regime depends entirely on the radiation-reaction treatment embedded in the simulation. The abstract provides no code, model, or validation details.
  • domain assumption A near-critical-density plasma with the assumed preplasma structure can be produced experimentally.
    The abstract argues the mechanism is robust and scalable for compact gamma sources, which transfers the simulation result to real experiments only if the idealized plasma profile is realizable in the laboratory.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of High-Energy Photon Generation from Self-Organized Plasma Cavities in Field-Enhanced Laser-Preplasma Interactions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CS3MLVIL

@misc{pith2026250806045,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: High-Energy Photon Generation from Self-Organized Plasma Cavities in Field-Enhanced Laser-Preplasma Interactions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CS3MLVIL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.06045}
}
abstract

The interaction of an ultraintense Nd:glass laser pulse with a near-critical plasma self-organizes into a highly efficient $\gamma$-ray source. Three-dimensional particle-in-cell simulations demonstrate that relativistic self-focusing, aided by a self-generated electron cavity, enhances the laser intensity by more than an order of magnitude, driving the system into the radiation-reaction-dominated regime, i.e. one where the electrons lose a substantial amount of their energy as hard radiation. Peak photon emission occurs near $0.5$ times the relativistic critical density, with a $\gamma$-photon yield exceeding $20\%$ of the laser energy. Compared to Ti:Sa lasers of the same power, the longer duration of Nd:glass laser pulses leads to an order of magnitude increase in $\gamma$-photon number in the extreme conversion efficiency regime, making them particularly well-suited for photonuclear physics applications. These findings point to a robust and scalable mechanism for compact, ultra-bright $\gamma$-ray generation in the multi-petawatt regime.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Strickland \ and\ author G

    author author D. Strickland \ and\ author G. Mourou ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4018(85)90120-8 journal journal Opt. Commun. \ volume 56 ,\ pages 219 ( year 1985 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1016/0030-4018(85)90120-8 1985

  2. [2]

    Di Piazza , author C

    author author A. Di Piazza , author C. M\"uller , author K. Z. \ Hatsagortsyan ,\ and\ author C. H. \ Keitel ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.84.1177 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 84 ,\ pages 1177 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.84.1177 2012

  3. [3]

    Gonoskov , author T

    author author A. Gonoskov , author T. G. \ Blackburn , author M. Marklund ,\ and\ author S. S. \ Bulanov ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.94.045001 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 94 ,\ pages 045001 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.94.045001 2022

  4. [4]

    Nakamura , author J

    author author T. Nakamura , author J. K. \ Koga , author T. Z. \ Esirkepov , author M. Kando , author G. Korn ,\ and\ author S. V. \ Bulanov ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.195001 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 108 ,\ pages 195001 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.195001 2012

  5. [5]

    author author C. P. \ Ridgers , author C. S. \ Brady , author R. Duclous , author J. G. \ Kirk , author K. Bennett , author T. D. \ Arber , author A. P. L. \ Robinson ,\ and\ author A. R. \ Bell ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.165006 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 108 ,\ pages 165006 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.165006 2012

  6. [6]

    Niel , author C

    author author F. Niel , author C. Riconda , author F. Amiranoff , author R. Duclous ,\ and\ author M. Grech ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.97.043209 journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 97 ,\ pages 043209 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.97.043209 2018

  7. [7]

    author author T. G. \ Blackburn ,\ https://doi.org/10.1007/s41614-020-0042-0 journal journal Rev. Mod. Plasma Phys. \ volume 4 ,\ pages 5 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1007/s41614-020-0042-0 2020

  8. [8]

    Hadjisolomou , author T

    author author P. Hadjisolomou , author T. M. \ Jeong , author D. Kolenaty , author A. J. \ Macleod , author V. Olšovcová , author R. Versaci , author C. P. \ Ridgers ,\ and\ author S. V. \ Bulanov ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0158264 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 30 ,\ pages 093103 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0158264 2023

Show all 61 references
  1. [9]

    author author K. W. D. \ Ledingham , author I. Spencer , author T. McCanny , author R. P. \ Singhal , author M. I. K. \ Santala , author E. Clark , author I. Watts , author F. N. \ Beg , author M. Zepf , author K. Krushelnick , et al. ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84....

    doi

  2. [10]

    author author V. G. \ Nedorezov , author A. A. \ Turinge ,\ and\ author Y. M. \ Shatunov ,\ https://doi.org/10.1070/pu2004v047n04abeh001743 journal journal Phys.-Uspekhi \ volume 47 ,\ pages 341 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

    2004 doi

  3. [11]

    u ller , author A. Di Piazza , author A. Shahbaz , author T. J. \ B \

    author author C. M \"u ller , author A. Di Piazza , author A. Shahbaz , author T. J. \ B \"u rvenich , author J. Evers , author K. Z. \ Hatsagortsyan ,\ and\ author C. H. \ Keitel ,\ https://doi.org/10.1134/S1054660X08030018 journal journal Laser Phys. \ volume 18 ,\ pages 175...

    2008 doi

  4. [12]

    author author M. J. \ Rees \ and\ author P. Mészáros ,\ https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/258.1.41P journal journal Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. \ volume 258 ,\ pages 41P ( year 1992 ) NoStop

    1992 doi

  5. [13]

    Ruffini , author G

    author author R. Ruffini , author G. Vereshchagin ,\ and\ author S. S. \ Xue ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2009.10.004 journal journal Phys. Rep. \ volume 487 ,\ pages 1 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    2009 doi

  6. [14]

    author author S. V. \ Bulanov , author T. Z. \ Esirkepov , author M. Kando , author J. Koga , author K. Kondo ,\ and\ author G. Korn ,\ https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063780X15010018 journal journal Plasma Phys. Rep. \ volume 41 ,\ pages 1 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015 doi

  7. [15]

    author author A. A. \ Philippov \ and\ author A. Spitkovsky ,\ https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aaabbc journal journal Astrophys. J. \ volume 855 ,\ pages 94 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018 doi

  8. [16]

    Aharonian , author Q

    author author F. Aharonian , author Q. An , author Axikegu , author L. X. \ Bai , author Y. X. \ Bai , author Y. W. \ Bao , author D. Bastieri , author X. J. \ Bi , author Y. J. \ Bi , author H. Cai , et al. ( collaboration LHAASO Collaboration ),\ https://doi.org/10.1103/Phys...

    2021 doi

  9. [17]

    author author A. J. \ MacLeod , author P. Hadjisolomou , author T. M. \ Jeong ,\ and\ author S. V. \ Bulanov ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.107.012215 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 107 ,\ pages 012215 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023 doi

  10. [18]

    Mirzaie , author C

    author author M. Mirzaie , author C. I. \ Hojbota , author D. Y. \ Kim , author V. B. \ Pathak , author T. G. \ Pak , author C. M. \ Kim , author H. W. \ Lee , author J. W. \ Yoon , author S. K. \ Lee , author Y. J. \ Rhee , author M. Vranic , author \'O . Amaro , author K. Y....

    2024 doi

  11. [19]

    Pukhov , author Z

    author author A. Pukhov , author Z. M. \ Sheng ,\ and\ author J. Meyer-ter Vehn ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.873242 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 6 ,\ pages 2847 ( year 1999 ) NoStop

    1999 doi

  12. [20]

    author author A. V. \ Arefiev , author A. P. L. \ Robinson ,\ and\ author V. N. \ Khudik ,\ https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022377815000434 journal journal J. Plasma Phys. \ volume 81 ,\ pages 475810404 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015 doi

  13. [21]

    Hadjisolomou , author T

    author author P. Hadjisolomou , author T. M. \ Jeong , author P. Valenta , author G. Korn ,\ and\ author S. V. \ Bulanov ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.104.015203 journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 104 ,\ pages 015203 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021 doi

  14. [22]

    Sugimoto , author Y

    author author K. Sugimoto , author Y. He , author N. Iwata , author I. L. \ Yeh , author K. Tangtartharakul , author A. Arefiev ,\ and\ author Y. Sentoku ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.065102 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 131 ,\ pages 065102 ( year 2023...

    2023 doi

  15. [23]

    Hadjisolomou , author T

    author author P. Hadjisolomou , author T. M. \ Jeong ,\ and\ author S. V. \ Bulanov ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-21352-8 journal journal Sci. Rep. \ volume 12 ,\ pages 17143 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022 doi

  16. [24]

    Esirkepov , author M

    author author T. Esirkepov , author M. Borghesi , author S. V. \ Bulanov , author G. Mourou ,\ and\ author T. Tajima ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.175003 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 92 ,\ pages 175003 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

    2004 doi

  17. [25]

    author author K. V. \ Lezhnin , author P. V. \ Sasorov , author G. Korn ,\ and\ author S. V. \ Bulanov ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5062849 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 25 ,\ pages 123105 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018 doi

  18. [26]

    Hadjisolomou , author I

    author author P. Hadjisolomou , author I. P. \ Tsygvintsev , author P. Sasorov , author V. Gasilov , author G. Korn ,\ and\ author S. V. \ Bulanov ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5124457 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 27 ,\ pages 013107 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020 doi

  19. [27]

    Rus , author P

    author author B. Rus , author P. Bakule , author R. Antipenkov , author T. Green , author P. Szotkowski , author J. Nov \'a k , author P. Trojek , author S. Vyhl \'i dka , author L. Haizer ,\ and\ author D. Kramer ,\ in\ https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3062737 booktitle High-power,...

    2025 doi

  20. [28]

    author author G. A. \ Askaryan ,\ @noop journal journal Sov. Phys. JETP \ volume 15 ,\ pages 1088 ( year 1962 ) NoStop

    1962

  21. [29]

    author author R. Y. \ Chiao , author E. Garmire ,\ and\ author C. H. \ Townes ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.479 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 13 ,\ pages 479 ( year 1964 ) NoStop

    1964 doi

  22. [30]

    author author P. L. \ Kelley ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.15.1005 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 15 ,\ pages 1005 ( year 1965 ) NoStop

    1965 doi

  23. [31]

    author author G. Z. \ Sun , author E. Ott , author Y. C. \ Lee ,\ and\ author P. Guzdar ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.866349 journal journal Phys. Fluids \ volume 30 ,\ pages 526 ( year 1987 ) NoStop

    1987 doi

  24. [32]

    author author S. V. \ Bulanov , author V. A. \ Vshivkov , author G. I. \ Dudnikova , author E. T. \ Z. , author F. Califano , author F. F. \ Kamenets , author T. V. \ Liseikina , author N. M. \ Naumova ,\ and\ author F. Pegoraro ,\ @noop journal journal Plasma Phys. Rep. \ vol...

    1999

  25. [33]

    Sazegari , author M

    author author V. Sazegari , author M. Mirzaie ,\ and\ author B. Shokri ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2178187 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 13 ,\ pages 033102 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    2006 doi

  26. [34]

    https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/17/4/043051 journal journal New J. Phys. \ volume 17 ,\ pages 043051 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015 doi

  27. [35]

    author author T. D. \ Arber , author K. Bennett , author C. S. \ Brady , author A. Lawrence-Douglas , author M. G. \ Ramsay , author N. J. \ Sircombe , author P. Gillies , author R. G. \ Evans , author H. Schmitz , author A. R. \ Bell , et al. ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/0741-3...

    2015 doi

  28. [36]

    Sachithanadam \ and\ author S

    author author M. Sachithanadam \ and\ author S. C. \ Joshi ,\ https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-013-7690-1 journal journal J. Mater. Sci. \ volume 49 ,\ pages 163 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014 doi

  29. [37]

    author author J. C. H. \ Wong , author H. Kaymak , author S. Brunner ,\ and\ author M. M. \ Koebel ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2013.08.029 journal journal Microporous Mesoporous Mater. \ volume 183 ,\ pages 23 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  30. [38]

    Iswar , author S

    author author S. Iswar , author S. Galmarini , author L. Bonanomi , author J. Wernery , author E. Roumeli , author S. Nimalshantha , author A. M. \ Ben Ishai , author M. Lattuada , author M. M. \ Koebel ,\ and\ author W. J. \ Malfait ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/...

    2021

  31. [39]

    author author A. V. \ Higuera \ and\ author J. R. \ Cary ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4979989 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 24 ,\ pages 052104 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  32. [40]

    Gahn , author G

    author author C. Gahn , author G. D. \ Tsakiris , author A. Pukhov , author J. Meyer-ter Vehn , author G. Pretzler , author P. Thirolf , author D. Habs ,\ and\ author K. J. \ Witte ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.4772 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 83 ,\ p...

    1999 doi

  33. [41]

    author author A. G. \ York , author H. M. \ Milchberg , author J. P. \ Palastro ,\ and\ author T. M. \ Antonsen ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.195001 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 100 ,\ pages 195001 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    2008 doi

  34. [42]

    Esarey , author P

    author author E. Esarey , author P. Sprangle ,\ and\ author J. Krall ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.52.5443 journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 52 ,\ pages 5443 ( year 1995 ) NoStop

    1995 doi

  35. [43]

    Passoni , author V

    author author M. Passoni , author V. T. \ Tikhonchuk , author M. Lontano ,\ and\ author V. Y. \ Bychenkov ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.69.026411 journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 69 ,\ pages 026411 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

    2004 doi

  36. [44]

    author author T. Z. \ Esirkepov , author Y. Sentoku , author K. Mima , author K. Nishihara , author F. Califano , author F. Pegoraro , author N. M. \ Naumova , author S. V. \ Bulanov , author Y. Ueshima , author T. V. \ Liseikina , et al. ,\ https://doi.org/10.1134/1.568134 jo...

    1999 doi

  37. [45]

    Park , author S

    author author J. Park , author S. S. \ Bulanov , author J. Bin , author Q. Ji , author S. Steinke , author J. L. \ Vay , author C. G. R. \ Geddes , author C. B. \ Schroeder , author W. P. \ Leemans , author T. Schenkel ,\ and\ author E. Esarey ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5094...

    2019 doi

  38. [46]

    Jiang , author A

    author author K. Jiang , author A. Pukhov ,\ and\ author C. T. \ Zhou ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ac0573 journal journal New J. Phys. \ volume 23 ,\ pages 063054 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021 doi

  39. [47]

    Valenta , author D

    author author P. Valenta , author D. Maslarova , author R. Babjak , author B. Martinez , author S. V. \ Bulanov ,\ and\ author M. Vrani c \' c ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.109.065204 journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 109 ,\ pages 065204 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024 doi

  40. [48]

    Willingale , author P

    author author L. Willingale , author P. M. \ Nilson , author A. G. R. \ Thomas , author J. Cobble , author R. S. \ Craxton , author A. Maksimchuk , author P. A. \ Norreys , author T. C. \ Sangster , author R. H. H. \ Scott , author C. Stoeckl , et al. ,\ https://doi.org/10.110...

    2011 doi

  41. [49]

    Ren , author M

    author author C. Ren , author M. Tzoufras , author F. S. \ Tsung , author W. B. \ Mori , author S. Amorini , author R. A. \ Fonseca , author L. O. \ Silva , author J. C. \ Adam ,\ and\ author A. Heron ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.185004 journal journal Phys. Rev. ...

    2004 doi

  42. [50]

    Tzoufras , author C

    author author M. Tzoufras , author C. Ren , author F. S. \ Tsung , author J. W. \ Tonge , author W. B. \ Mori , author M. Fiore , author R. A. \ Fonseca ,\ and\ author L. O. \ Silva ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.105002 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 96 ,...

    2006 doi

  43. [51]

    author author S. V. \ Bulanov , author T. Z. \ Esirkepov , author M. Kando , author F. Pegoraro , author S. S. \ Bulanov , author C. G. R. \ Geddes , author C. B. \ Schroeder , author E. Esarey ,\ and\ author W. P. \ Leemans ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4757981 journal journal...

    2012 doi

  44. [52]

    author author N. P. \ Dover , author O. Tresca , author N. Cook , author O. C. \ Ettlinger , author R. J. \ Kingham , author C. Maharjan , author M. N. \ Polyanskiy , author P. Shkolnikov , author I. Pogorelsky ,\ and\ author Z. Najmudin ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett....

    2025 doi

  45. [53]

    Sprangle , author E

    author author P. Sprangle , author E. Esarey , author J. Krall ,\ and\ author G. Joyce ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2200 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 69 ,\ pages 2200 ( year 1992 ) NoStop

    1992 doi

  46. [54]

    Sprangle , author J

    author author P. Sprangle , author J. Krall ,\ and\ author E. Esarey ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.3544 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 73 ,\ pages 3544 ( year 1994 ) NoStop

    1994 doi

  47. [55]

    Ceurvorst , author N

    author author L. Ceurvorst , author N. Ratan , author M. C. \ Levy , author M. F. \ Kasim , author J. Sadler , author R. H. H. \ Scott , author R. M. G. M. \ Trines , author T. W. \ Huang , author M. Skramic , author M. Vranic , et al. ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/18/5...

    2016 doi

  48. [56]

    author author H. Y. \ Lan , author D. Wu , author J. X. \ Liu , author J. Y. \ Zhang , author H. G. \ Lu , author J. F. \ Lv , author X. Z. \ Wu , author W. Luo ,\ and\ author X. Q. \ Yan ,\ https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-023-01219-x journal journal Nucl. Sci. Tech. \ volume 3...

    2023 doi

  49. [57]

    Wu , author H

    author author D. Wu , author H. Y. \ Lan , author J. Y. \ Zhang , author J. X. \ Liu , author H. G. \ Lu , author J. F. \ Lv , author X. Z. \ Wu , author H. Zhang , author J. Cai , author X. L. \ Xu , et al. ,\ https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2023.1178257 journal journal Front. P...

    2023

  50. [58]

    author author F. A. \ Rasulova , author N. V. \ Aksenov , author S. I. \ Alekseev , author S. S. \ Belyshev , author I. Chuprakov , author N. Y. \ Fursova , author A. S. \ Madumarov , author J. H. \ Khushvaktov ,\ and\ author A. A. \ Kuznetsov ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRe...

    2025 doi

  51. [59]

    author author A. J. \ Koning , author D. Rochman , author J. C. \ Sublet , author N. Dzysiuk , author M. Fleming ,\ and\ author S. van der Marck ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2019.01.002 journal journal Nuclear Data Sheets \ volume 155 ,\ pages 1 ( year 2019...

    2019 doi

  52. [60]

    Roth , author D

    author author M. Roth , author D. Jung , author K. Falk , author N. Guler , author O. Deppert , author M. Devlin , author A. Favalli , author J. Fernandez , author D. Gautier , author M. Geissel , et al. ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.044802 journal journal Phys. R...

    2013 doi

  53. [61]

    Gonoskov , author A

    author author A. Gonoskov , author A. Bashinov , author S. Bastrakov , author E. Efimenko , author A. Ilderton , author A. Kim , author M. Marklund , author I. Meyerov , author A. Muraviev ,\ and\ author A. Sergeev ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.7.041003 journal journal P...

    2017 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.