REVIEW 1 cited by
New Hard-thresholding Rules based on Data Splitting in High-dimensional Imbalanced Classification
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
In binary classification, imbalance refers to situations in which one class is heavily under-represented. This issue is due to either a data collection process or because one class is indeed rare in a population. Imbalanced classification frequently arises in applications such as biology, medicine, engineering, and social sciences. In this paper, for the first time, we theoretically study the impact of imbalance class sizes on the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) in high dimensions. We show that due to data scarcity in one class, referred to as the minority class, and high-dimensionality of the feature space, the LDA ignores the minority class yielding a maximum misclassification rate. We then propose a new construction of hard-thresholding rules based on a data splitting technique that reduces the large difference between the misclassification rates. We show that the proposed method is asymptotically optimal. We further study two well-known sparse versions of the LDA in imbalanced cases. We evaluate the finite-sample performance of different methods using simulations and by analyzing two real data sets. The results show that our method either outperforms its competitors or has comparable performance based on a much smaller subset of selected features, while being computationally more efficient.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Machine learning prediction of binary formation in three-body gravitational encounters
An XGBoost classifier trained on 312,666 three-body scattering simulations predicts binary formation from initial conditions with PR-AUC 0.99 on balanced data but 0.66 on realistic imbalanced data.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.