REVIEW 1 cited by
A Catalog of Helium Abundance Indicators from Globular Cluster Photometry
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
For each of the three indicators used, we have conducted a thorough error analysis, and identified systematic errors in the computational procedures. For the population ratio R = N_HB / N_RGB, we find that there is no evidence of a trend with metallicity, although there appears to be real scatter in the values derived. Although this indicator is the one best able to provide useful absolute helium abundances, the mean value is Y approximately 0.20, indicating the probable presence of additional systematic error. For the magnitude difference from the horizontal branch to the main sequence Delta and the RR Lyrae mass-luminosity exponent A, it is only possible to reliably determine relative helium abundances. This is due to continuing uncertainties in the absolute metallicity scale for Delta, and uncertainty in the RR Lyrae temperature scale for A. Both indicators imply that the helium abundance is approximately constant as a function of [Fe/H]. According to the A indicator, both Oosterhoff I and II group clusters have constant values independent of [Fe/H] and horizontal branch type. In addition, the two groups have slopes d log P / d[Fe/H] that are consistent with each other, but significantly smaller than the slope for the combined sample.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Probing Heavy Axion-like Particles from Massive Stars with X-rays and Gamma Rays
Decay photons from heavy ALPs produced in Wolf-Rayet stars can be probed by INTEGRAL SPI down to gaγ ~ 4e-11 GeV^-1 for ma ~ 10-100 keV, modestly extending existing limits.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.