Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 48 references

Semi-nonparametric models of multidimensional matching: an optimal transport approach

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-25 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Optimal transport identifies production technology and matching functions in worker-job models without joint normality of characteristics.

desk verdict The paper generalizes OT identification and sieve estimation for multidimensional matching beyond joint normality but the uniqueness of the recovered surplus for arbitrary marginals is not clearly secured. read the letter →

arxiv 2405.18089 v2 pith:CWMHP4B3 submitted 2024-05-28 econ.EM

Dongwoo Kim , Young Jun Lee This is my paper
classification econ.EM
keywords multidimensionalmatchingoptimaltransportsieveestimationworker-jobwageinequalitysemi-nonparametricmodelscognitiveabilitiestransferableutility
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper develops sieve estimators for multidimensional matching models of workers to jobs that drop the joint normality assumption on observed traits. It uses optimal transport theory to prove that the production technology, equilibrium wages, and matching functions remain identified from completely unrestricted distributions. Re-estimating U.S. labor market data from 1990 to 2010 yields larger measured technological progress favoring cognitive abilities and a closer match to observed wage inequality trends. Readers care because the approach supplies a practical, less restrictive way to recover how skills sort into jobs and how technology reshapes inequality.

What carries the argument

The optimal transport map between the distributions of worker and job characteristics, which recovers the production technology and equilibrium functions.

What would settle it

A Monte Carlo experiment in which data are generated from a known non-normal joint distribution and the sieve estimator fails to recover the true production function would falsify the identification claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Using optimal transport theory, the authors establish that the production technology and the equilibrium wage and matching functions in multidimensional worker-job matching models are identified from the observed distributions of characteristics without imposing joint normality. They propose consistent sieve estimators for these objects and demonstrate in an empirical application that the U.S. economy saw substantially larger technological progress favoring cognitive abilities from 1990 to 2010 than earlier parametric estimates indicated, while also achieving a better fit to the observed changes in wage inequality.

Load-bearing premise

The production technology and equilibrium functions remain identified when the joint distribution of worker and job characteristics is left completely unrestricted.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Identification of the production technology and equilibrium functions holds for any joint distribution of characteristics.
  • The proposed sieve estimators are consistent, asymptotically normal, and efficient.
  • Re-estimation shows substantially larger technological progress favoring cognitive abilities between 1990 and 2010.
  • Flexible specifications deliver a significantly better fit to the evolution of wage inequality than quadratic-Gaussian models.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same optimal-transport identification argument could be applied to other transferable-utility matching settings such as marriage markets or firm-to-firm networks.
  • Applied researchers might re-examine skill-biased technical change findings in additional countries or time periods using the unrestricted-distribution estimators.
  • The method opens the possibility of testing whether matching patterns respond differently to technology shocks once normality restrictions are removed.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper develops a set of sieve estimators for semi-nonparametric multidimensional matching models with transferable utility. It generalizes the quadratic-Gaussian parametric framework of Bojilov-Galichon (2016) and Lindenlaub (2017) by allowing unrestricted distributions of worker and job characteristics, claims identification of the production technology and equilibrium wage/matching functions via optimal transport theory, proposes consistent and asymptotically normal estimators, and applies the method to US data from 1990-2010 to find larger technological progress favoring cognitive abilities and improved fit to wage inequality evolution.

Significance. If the identification result holds under the stated conditions, the contribution lies in extending matching models to flexible distributions without joint normality, yielding revised empirical conclusions on technological change and inequality. The provision of sieve estimators that are claimed to be efficient and asymptotically normal would be a practical advance for applied work in this area.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / Identification argument] The identification claim (abstract and introduction) that the production technology φ(x,y) and equilibrium functions are identified from the observed matching for completely unrestricted marginal distributions via OT theory alone requires explicit regularity conditions. For non-Gaussian marginals the inverse OT problem is generally set-valued, so multiple surplus functions can generate the same optimal coupling; the manuscript must state the precise restrictions (e.g., strict convexity, separability, or sieve-class constraints) that restore uniqueness, as the quadratic-Gaussian case does not automatically extend.
  2. [Estimation theory] The consistency and asymptotic normality of the proposed sieve estimators rest on the identification result; without the additional structure needed for point identification in the general case, the convergence claims in the estimation section cannot be verified from the stated OT application.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Clarify the precise sieve basis and penalty terms used in the estimators; the abstract mentions 'efficient, consistent, and asymptotically normal' but does not indicate the rate or the form of the sieve approximation.
  2. [Empirical application] The empirical comparison to Lindenlaub (2017) would benefit from a table reporting the exact parameter differences and standard errors for the cognitive-ability technology coefficients.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for these constructive comments on the identification argument and its implications for the estimation theory. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Identification argument] The identification claim (abstract and introduction) that the production technology φ(x,y) and equilibrium functions are identified from the observed matching for completely unrestricted marginal distributions via OT theory alone requires explicit regularity conditions. For non-Gaussian marginals the inverse OT problem is generally set-valued, so multiple surplus functions can generate the same optimal coupling; the manuscript must state the precise restrictions (e.g., strict convexity, separability, or sieve-class constraints) that restore uniqueness, as the quadratic-Gaussian case does not automatically extend.

    Authors: We agree that uniqueness of the surplus function in the inverse OT problem requires additional regularity conditions when marginals are unrestricted. The manuscript invokes the sieve approximation class together with strict convexity of φ to restore point identification, but these conditions are not stated with sufficient precision in the abstract and introduction. In the revision we will explicitly list the required conditions (strict convexity of the production function, compactness of the sieve space, and the resulting uniqueness of the OT map) and clarify how they extend the quadratic-Gaussian case. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Estimation theory] The consistency and asymptotic normality of the proposed sieve estimators rest on the identification result; without the additional structure needed for point identification in the general case, the convergence claims in the estimation section cannot be verified from the stated OT application.

    Authors: We concur that the consistency and asymptotic normality results presuppose point identification. Once the regularity conditions are stated explicitly in the identification section, the sieve estimation arguments (which rely on standard uniform convergence and argmax theorems under identified parameters) carry through. We will add a short remark in the estimation section that cross-references the updated identification conditions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: identification derived from standard optimal transport theory applied to unrestricted marginals

full rationale

The paper's central identification result is stated to follow from optimal transport theory applied to the matching problem with unrestricted characteristic distributions, generalizing the quadratic-Gaussian setup of Bojilov-Galichon (2016) and Lindenlaub (2017). No load-bearing steps reduce by construction to the authors' own fitted parameters, self-citations, or ansatzes; the derivation chain invokes external OT results without renaming known patterns or smuggling assumptions via self-reference. The empirical application is presented as a downstream use of the identified primitives rather than a tautology.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; full list of free parameters, axioms, and invented entities cannot be extracted. The approach relies on transferable utility and optimal transport identification as background assumptions standard in the cited literature.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Matching occurs under transferable utility
    Standard maintained assumption for worker-job assignment models referenced in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Optimal transport recovers the production technology and wage function from observed matches
    Central identification claim that replaces the joint-normality restriction of prior work.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Semi-nonparametric models of multidimensional matching: an optimal transport approach." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CWMHP4B3

@misc{pith2026240518089,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Semi-nonparametric models of multidimensional matching: an optimal transport approach},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CWMHP4B3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2405.18089}
}
read the original abstract

This paper develops a set of empirically tractable and flexible sieve estimators for semi-nonparametric multidimensional matching models with transferable utility, focusing on worker-job matching. We generalize the parametric quadratic-Gaussian framework employed by Bojilov and Galichon (2016) and Lindenlaub (2017), which relies on joint normality of observed characteristics. We allow unrestricted distributions of characteristics and show identification of the production technology and the equilibrium wage and matching functions using optimal transport theory. Given identification, we propose efficient, consistent, and asymptotically normal sieve estimators. We revisit Lindenlaub's empirical application and show that, between 1990 and 2010, the U.S. economy experienced much larger technological progress favoring cognitive abilities than the original findings suggest. Furthermore, our flexible model specifications provide a significantly better fit for patterns in the evolution of wage inequality.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Efficient Estimation of Models with Conditional Moment Restrictions Containing Unknown Functions,

    AI, C HUNRONG AND XIAOHONG CHEN (2003): “Efficient Estimation of Models with Conditional Moment Restrictions Containing Unknown Functions,”Econometrica, 71 (6), 1795–1843. [3, 5, 19, 20, 21, 4] ——— (2007): “Estimation of possibly misspecified semiparametric conditional moment restriction models with different conditioning variables,”Journal of Econometric...

    work page 2003

  2. [2]

    A Theory of Marriage: Part I,

    BECKER , G ARY S. (1973): “A Theory of Marriage: Part I,” Journal of Political Economy, 81 (4), 813–846. [2, 10] BECKER , GARY S (1991): A treatise on the family: Enlarged edition, Harvard university press

    work page 1973

  3. [3]

    Semi-Nonparametric IV Esti- mation of Shape-Invariant Engel Curves,

    BLUNDELL , R ICHARD , X IAOHONG CHEN , AND DENNIS KRISTENSEN (2007): “Semi-Nonparametric IV Esti- mation of Shape-Invariant Engel Curves,”Econometrica, 75 (6), 1613–1669

    work page 2007

  4. [4]

    Matching in closed-form: equilibrium, identification, and comparative statics,

    BOJILOV , RAICHO AND ALFRED GALICHON (2016): “Matching in closed-form: equilibrium, identification, and comparative statics,”Economic Theory, 61, 587–609

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    BROWNING , M ARTIN , P IERRE -A NDRÉ CHIAPPORI , AND YORAM WEISS (2014): Economics of the Family , Cambridge University Press

    work page 2014

  6. [6]

    Boundary regularity of maps with convex potentials,

    CAFFARELLI , LUIS A. (1992a): “Boundary regularity of maps with convex potentials,”Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 45 (9), 1141–1151. [6, 21] CAFFARELLI , L UIS A (1992b): “The regularity of mappings with a convex potential,” Journal of the American Mathematical Society, 5 (1), 99–104. [6, 21] ——— (1996): “Boundary regularity of maps with ...

    work page 1996

  7. [7]

    Duality and existence for a class of mass transportation problems and economic applications,

    [6, 21] CARLIER , GUILLAUME (2003): “Duality and existence for a class of mass transportation problems and economic applications,”Advances in mathematical economics, 1–21

    work page 2003

  8. [8]

    Efficient estimation of average derivatives in NPIV models: Simulation comparisons of neural network estimators,

    SEMI-NONPARAMETRIC MULTIDIMENSIONAL MATCHING 43 CHEN , J IAFENG , X IAOHONG CHEN , AND ELIE TAMER (2023): “Efficient estimation of average derivatives in NPIV models: Simulation comparisons of neural network estimators,”Journal of Econometrics

    work page 2023

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    Chapter 76 Large Sample Sieve Estimation of Semi-Nonparametric Models,

    CHEN , X IAOHONG (2007): “Chapter 76 Large Sample Sieve Estimation of Semi-Nonparametric Models,” Else- vier, vol. 6 of Handbook of Econometrics, 5549–5632. [4, 5, 17, 18, 19, 22, 1, 2, 3] CHEN , X IAOHONG AND DEMIAN POUZO (2009): “Efficient estimation of semiparametric condit...

    2007

  2. [10]

    Sieve Extremum Estimates for Weakly Dependent Data,

    CHEN , X IAOHONG AND XIAOTONG SHEN (1998): “Sieve Extremum Estimates for Weakly Dependent Data,” Econometrica, 66 (2), 289–314. [19, 2] CHIAPPORI , PIERRE -ANDRÉ (2017): Matching with Transfers: The Economics of Love and Marriage, Princeton University Press

    1998

  3. [11]

    Hedonic price equilibria, stable matching, and optimal transport: equivalence, topology, and uniqueness,

    CHIAPPORI , PIERRE -A NDRÉ , ROBERT J MCCANN , AND LARS P NESHEIM (2010): “Hedonic price equilibria, stable matching, and optimal transport: equivalence, topology, and uniqueness,”Economic Theory, 42, 317–354. [3, 8] CHIAPPORI , PIERRE -ANDRÉ AND SONIA OREFFICE (2008): “Birth ...

    2010

  4. [12]

    Fatter attrac- tion: anthropometric and socioeconomic matching on the marriage market,

    CHIAPPORI , PIERRE -ANDRÉ , SONIA OREFFICE , AND CLIMENT QUINTANA -D OMEQUE (2012): “Fatter attrac- tion: anthropometric and socioeconomic matching on the marriage market,” Journal of Political Economy, 120 (4), 659–695

    2012

  5. [13]

    Matching to share risk,

    CHIAPPORI , PIERRE -A NDRÉ AND PHILIP J. R ENY (2016): “Matching to share risk,”Theoretical Economics, 11 (1), 227–251

    2016

  6. [14]

    Duality in dynamic discrete-choice models,

    CHIONG , K HAI XIANG , A LFRED GALICHON , AND MATT SHUM (2016): “Duality in dynamic discrete-choice models,”Quantitative Economics, 7 (1), 83–115

    2016

  7. [15]

    Who marries whom and why,

    CHOO , E UGENE AND ALOYSIUS SIOW (2006): “Who marries whom and why,” Journal of political Economy , 114 (1), 175–201. [2, 5] COMPIANI , G IOVANNI (2022): “Market counterfactuals and the specification of multiproduct demand: A non- parametric approach,”Quantitative Economics, 1...

    2006

  8. [16]

    Regularity of monotone transport maps be- tween unbounded domains,

    CORDERO -E RAUSQUIN , D ARIO AND ALESSIO FIGALLI (2019): “Regularity of monotone transport maps be- tween unbounded domains,”Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 39 (12), 7101–7112. [6, 21] DE PHILIPPIS , G UIDO AND ALESSIO FIGALLI (2014): “The Monge-Ampère equation and ...

    2019

  9. [17]

    Personality Traits and the Marriage Market,

    DUPUY, A RNAUD AND ALFRED GALICHON (2014): “Personality Traits and the Marriage Market,” Journal of Political Economy, 122 (6), 1271–1319

    2014

  10. [18]

    Identifying Sorting-In Theory,

    EECKHOUT , J AN AND PHILIPP KIRCHER (2011): “Identifying Sorting-In Theory,” The Review of Economic Studies, 78 (3), 872–906

    2011

  11. [19]

    Notes on optimal transportation,

    EKELAND , IVAR (2010): “Notes on optimal transportation,”Economic Theory, 437–459

    2010

  12. [20]

    A weak condition for the convexity of tensor-product Bézier and B-spline sur- faces,

    44 FLOATER , M ICHAEL S (1994): “A weak condition for the convexity of tensor-product Bézier and B-spline sur- faces,”Advances in Computational Mathematics, 2, 67–80

    1994

  13. [21]

    A survey of some recent applications of optimal transport methods to economet- rics,

    GALICHON , A LFRED (2017): “A survey of some recent applications of optimal transport methods to economet- rics,”The Econometrics Journal, 20 (2), C1–C11. [3, 7] GALICHON , A LFRED , S COTT DUKE KOMINERS , AND SIMON WEBER (2019): “Costly Concessions: An Em- pirical Framework f...

    2017

  14. [22]

    Cupid’s invisible hand: Social surplus and identification in matching models,

    GALICHON , ALFRED AND BERNARD SALANIÉ (2022): “Cupid’s invisible hand: Social surplus and identification in matching models,”The Review of Economic Studies, 89 (5), 2600–2629. [3, 5] GROSSBARD -S CHECHTMAN , SHOSHANA (1993): “A Theory of Marriage, Labor and Divorce,”

    2022

  15. [23]

    Partial identification in matching models for the marriage market,

    GUALDANI , C RISTINA AND SHRUTI SINHA (2023): “Partial identification in matching models for the marriage market,”Journal of Political Economy, 131 (5), 1109–1171

    2023

  16. [24]

    Matching and sorting in online dating,

    HITSCH , G ÜNTER J, A LI HORTAÇSU , AND DAN ARIELY (2010): “Matching and sorting in online dating,” American Economic Review, 100 (1), 130–163

    2010

  17. [25]

    Beauty is a beast, frog is a prince: Assortative matching with nontransferabilities,

    LEGROS , PATRICK AND ANDREW F NEWMAN (2007): “Beauty is a beast, frog is a prince: Assortative matching with nontransferabilities,”Econometrica, 75 (4), 1073–1102

    2007

  18. [26]

    Sorting Multidimensional Types: Theory and Application,

    LINDENLAUB , ILSE (2017): “Sorting Multidimensional Types: Theory and Application,”The Review of Economic Studies, 84 (2), 718–789. [2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 12, 13, 14, 16, 18, 22, 23, 28, 30, 31, 33, 34, 40, 9] LISE , J EREMY AND FABIEN POSTEL -V INAY (2020): “Multidimensional Skills...

    2017

  19. [27]

    Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications,

    MARDIA , K. V. (1970): “Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications,” Biometrika, 57 (3), 519–530

    1970

  20. [28]

    Instrumental Variable Estimation of Nonparametric Models,

    NEWEY, W HITNEY K. AND JAMES L. P OWELL (2003): “Instrumental Variable Estimation of Nonparametric Models,”Econometrica, 71 (5), 1565–1578

    2003

  21. [29]

    Anthropometry and socioeconomics among couples: Evidence in the United States,

    OREFFICE , S ONIA AND CLIMENT QUINTANA -D OMEQUE (2010): “Anthropometry and socioeconomics among couples: Evidence in the United States,”Economics & Human Biology, 8 (3), 373–384

    2010

  22. [30]

    Learning your comparative advantages,

    PAPAGEORGIOU , T HEODORE (2014): “Learning your comparative advantages,”Review of Economic Studies, 81 (3), 1263–1295

    2014

  23. [31]

    Assortative mating by schooling and the work behavior of wives and husbands,

    PENCAVEL , J OHN (1998): “Assortative mating by schooling and the work behavior of wives and husbands,”The American Economic Review, 88 (2), 326–329

    1998

  24. [32]

    Computational optimal transport: With applications to data science,

    PEYRÉ , G ABRIEL , M ARCO CUTURI , ET AL . (2019): “Computational optimal transport: With applications to data science,”Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning, 11 (5-6), 355–607

    2019

  25. [33]

    Changes in assortative mating: The impact of age and education, 1970–1890,

    QIAN , Z HENCHAO (1998): “Changes in assortative mating: The impact of age and education, 1970–1890,” De- mography, 35 (3), 279–292

    1998

  26. [34]

    Skill accumulation, skill uncertainty, and occupational choice,

    SEMI-NONPARAMETRIC MULTIDIMENSIONAL MATCHING 45 SANDERS , C ARL (2014): “Skill accumulation, skill uncertainty, and occupational choice,” Working Paper. [14, 30] SHEN , XIAOTONG (1997): “On methods of sieves and penalization,”The Annals of Statistics, 25 (6), 2555 –

    2014

  27. [35]

    Assortative mating by body height and BMI: Finnish twins and their spouses,

    SILVENTOINEN , K ARRI , J AAKKO KAPRIO , E ERO LAHELMA , R ICHARD J V IKEN , AND RICHARD J R OSE (2003): “Assortative mating by body height and BMI: Finnish twins and their spouses,” American Journal of Human Biology, 15 (5), 620–627

    2003

  28. [36]

    Shape restricted nonparametric regression with Bernstein polynomials,

    VILLANI , C ÉDRIC (2003): Topics in optimal transportation, vol. 58, American Mathematical Soc. [3, 1] VILLANI , C ÉDRIC (2008): Optimal Transport: Old and New, Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, Springer. [3, 8, 9] WANG , J. AND S.K. G HOSH (2012): “Shape restrict...

    2003

  29. [37]

    Match quality, new information, and marital dissolution,

    WEISS , Y ORAM AND ROBERT J W ILLIS (1997): “Match quality, new information, and marital dissolution,” Journal of labor Economics, 15 (1, Part 2), S293–S329

    1997

  30. [38]

    Education and self-selection,

    WILLIS , ROBERT J AND SHERWIN ROSEN (1979): “Education and self-selection,”Journal of political Economy, 87 (5, Part 2), S7–S36

    1979

  31. [39]

    By Theorem 2.12 in Villani (2003), ∇xx′˜y|˜y=T (x) = ∇wo∗ (x) and therefore, ∇w∗ (x) = ∇wo∗ (x) + b

    SEMI-NONPARAMETRIC MULTIDIMENSIONAL MATCHING 1 APPENDIX A: T ECHNICAL PROOFS PROOF OF PROPOSITION 2: In the equilibrium, the firm maximizes its profit so the first-order condition of the firm’s maximization problem is satisfied: ∇w∗ (x) − b = ∇xx′˜y ˜y=T (x) . By Theorem 2.12 ...

    2003

  32. [40]

    , xd, xd+1 ∈ X such that A0y1 = ∇w0 (x1) ,

    Then, there are corresponding d + 1 distinct points x1, . . . , xd, xd+1 ∈ X such that A0y1 = ∇w0 (x1) , . . . , A0yd = ∇w0 (xd) , A0y∗ d+1 = ∇w0 (xd+1). It follows from the invertibil- ity of A0 that ∇w0 (x1) − ∇ w0 (x2) = A0 (y1 − y2) , . . . ,∇w0 (xd) − ∇ w0 (xd+1) = A0 (yd...

    2007

  33. [41]

    + κM ∇M {w (x) − w0 (x)}   . Then, it is easy to see from Assumption 7 that ∥λ − λ0∥2 ≍ E h ρ′ (zi; λ) Σ (xi)−1 ρ (zi; λ) − ρ′ (zi; λ0) Σ (xi)−1 ρ (zi; λ0) i , i.e., there exists a finite C1 > 0 such that C−1 1 ∥λ − λ0∥2 ≤ E h ρ′ (zi; λ) Σ (xi)−1 ρ (zi; λ) − ρ′ (zi; λ0) Σ ...

    2007

  34. [42]

    Again, Assumption 7 implies that there exists a C2 > 0 such that E ρ′ (zi; λ0) Σ (xi)−1 ρ (zi; λ0) − ρ′ (zi; λ) Σ (xi)−1 ρ (zi; λ) 2 ≤ C2E h |ρ (zi; λ0) − ρ (zi; λ)|4 e i

    Now we check Conditions 3.7 and 3.8 in Chen (2007). Again, Assumption 7 implies that there exists a C2 > 0 such that E ρ′ (zi; λ0) Σ (xi)−1 ρ (zi; λ0) − ρ′ (zi; λ) Σ (xi)−1 ρ (zi; λ) 2 ≤ C2E h |ρ (zi; λ0) − ρ (zi; λ)|4 e i . By Lemma 2 in Chen and Shen (1998), we have ∥w − w0∥...

    2007

  35. [43]

    Using Lemma 2 in Chen and Shen (1998) again, Condition 3.8 is satisfied

    On the other hand, ρ′ (zi; λ0) Σ (xi)−1 ρ (zi; λ0) − ρ′ (zi; λ) Σ (xi)−1 ρ (zi; λ) ≤ ∥λ − λ0∥∞ |Σ (xi)|−1 (2 |ε|e + ∥λ∥∞ + ∥λ0∥∞) , almost surely. Using Lemma 2 in Chen and Shen (1998) again, Condition 3.8 is satisfied. To apply Theorem 3.2 in Chen (2007), It remains to comput...

    1998

  36. [44]

    Let u∗ θ = u∗ θ1, u∗ θ2, u∗ θ3, u∗ θ4 ′ = E h Dv∗ (xi)′ Σ (xi)−1 Dv∗ (xi) i −1 η, u∗ w = −v∗u∗ θ and u∗ = u∗ θ, u∗ w , where η ∈ R4 is an arbitrary unit vector

    Assumption 4.1.(iii) is implied by our Proposition 3 and As- sumption 10: there is πnu∗ ∈ W n such that ∥πnu∗ − u∗∥ × ∥ ˆλn − λ0∥ = op n−1/2 . Let u∗ θ = u∗ θ1, u∗ θ2, u∗ θ3, u∗ θ4 ′ = E h Dv∗ (xi)′ Σ (xi)−1 Dv∗ (xi) i −1 η, u∗ w = −v∗u∗ θ and u∗ = u∗ θ, u∗ w , where η ∈ R4 is...

    2007

  37. [45]

    4 Condition 4.2.’ can be verified by applying Lemma 4.2 in Chen (2007)

    ∇M (πnu∗ w (x))   , Condition 4.3’ is satisfied given the definition of∥·∥ and ⟨ˆλn − λ0, πnu∗⟩ = E dρ (zi; λ0) dλ h ˆλn − λ0 i ′ Σ (xi)−1 dρ (zi; λ0) dλ [πnu∗] . 4 Condition 4.2.’ can be verified by applying Lemma 4.2 in Chen (2007). Condition on the metric entropy with b...

    2007

  38. [46]

    PROOF OF THEOREM 3: We follow the proofs of Theorem 4.1 and 6.2 in Ai and Chen (2003)

    Q.E.D. PROOF OF THEOREM 3: We follow the proofs of Theorem 4.1 and 6.2 in Ai and Chen (2003). Let Non ≡ n λ ∈ Θ × Wn : ∥λ − λ0∥s = o (1) , ∥λ − λ0∥ = o n−1/4 o . By Proposition 3, the sieve GLS estimator ˜λn in Step 1 satisfies ∥˜λn − λ0∥s = op (1) and ∥˜λn − λ0∥ = op n−1/4 . ...

    2003

  39. [47]

    Wang and Ghosh (2012) show that {W cvx n } is nested and dense in W cvx with respect to sup-norm

    (x − x)2 kn−2X j=0 γj+2 − 2γj+1 + γj  kn − 2 j   x − x x − x j x − x x − x kn−2−j , the above restriction ensures w(2) n (·) ≥ 0 for all n. Wang and Ghosh (2012) show that {W cvx n } is nested and dense in W cvx with respect to sup-norm. SEMI-NONPARAMETRIC MULTIDIMENSIONAL...

    2012

  40. [48]

    ∈ X }. Note that Floater (1994) provides sufficient conditions for the two-dimensional Bern- stein polynomial wn (x; γ) to be convex, which includes linear inequalities (17) as well as additional nonlinear constraints. We use (17) for our estimation because (i) they are easy t...

    1994

Pith tools

Reviewed May 25, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.