Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Primordial non-Gaussianity: local curvature method and statistical significance of constraints on f_NL from WMAP data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv astro-ph/0406026 v3 pith:CXRZNBSK submitted 2004-06-01 astro-ph

classification astro-ph
keywords methodfrequentistapproachbarsbayesiancurvatureerrorestimates
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We test the consistency of estimates of the non-linear coupling constant f_{NL} using non-Gaussian CMB maps generated by the method described in (Liguori, Matarrese and Moscardini 2003). This procedure to obtain non-Gaussian maps differs significantly from the method used in previous works on estimation of f_{NL}. Nevertheless, using spherical wavelets, we find results in very good agreement with (Mukherjee and Wang 2004), showing that the two ways of generating primordial non-Gaussian maps give equivalent results. Moreover, we introduce a new method for estimating the non-linear coupling constant from CMB observations by using the local curvature of the temperature fluctuation field. We present both Bayesian credible regions (assuming a flat prior) and proper (frequentist) confidence intervals on f_{NL}, and discuss the relation between the two approaches. The Bayesian approach tends to yield lower error bars than the frequentist approach, suggesting that a careful analysis of the different interpretations is needed. Using this method, we estimate f_{NL}=-10^{+270}_{-260} at the 2\sigma level (Bayesian) and f_{NL}=-10^{+310}_{-270} (frequentist). Moreover, we find that the wavelet and the local curvature approaches, which provide similar error bars, yield approximately uncorrelated estimates of f_{NL} and therefore, as advocated in (Cabella et al. 2004), the estimates may be combined to reduce the error bars. In this way, we obtain f_{NL}=-5\pm 85 and f_{NL}=-5\pm 175 at the 1\sigma and 2\sigma level respectively using the frequentist approach.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools