Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 75 references

A Galactic Interloper: A Study of the Cam OB1 Association's Clusters and its Visitor from the Perseus Arm

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Three overlapping clusters in Cam OB1 were born in separate places, and the oldest one came from the Perseus arm.

desk verdict Plausible but unverifiable: the Perseus-arm interloper claim rests on traceback assumptions the abstract doesn't document, and the full text I received is too corrupted to check. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.09393 v1 pith:CZB6NG6Y submitted 2025-08-12 astro-ph.GA

Joseph Mullen , Amanda Mast , Marina Kounkel , Keivan Stassun , Alexandre Roman-Lopes , Jonathan Tan This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords openclustersCamOB1stellarassociationsGaiaastrometryclusterkinematicsspiralarmsPerseusarmtraceback
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the Cam OB1 association, long treated as a single stellar subgroup, actually holds three distinct clusters that only overlap in projection. Using astrometric clustering in three-dimensional position and two-dimensional motion, supplemented by radial velocities, it recovers clusters aged 10, 15.8, and 20 Myr, with 140, 469, and 184 members, all at about the same distance near 1 kpc. Integrating their present-day motions backward places two of the clusters inside Cam OB1 and the oldest at the near edge of the Perseus arm, toward Per OB1 or Cas OB6. The intended conclusion is that the clusters formed independently, had no influence on each other, and are currently passing through the same line of sight. If correct, Cam OB1 becomes a concrete example of stellar groups from different spiral arms visiting and crossing one another.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is kinematic deblending plus orbital traceback. Stars are grouped by coherence in 3D position and 2D proper motion, with radial velocities added where available, yielding three mean space motions; each mean motion is then integrated backward through an assumed model of the Milky Way's gravitational potential to recover where the cluster was at its age. The separation of the recovered birth sites is what converts a one-subgroup region into three independent clusters, one of which is a visitor from the Perseus arm.

What would settle it

Re-run the traceback with an alternative Milky Way potential, such as different bar or spiral parameters, and check whether the 20 Myr cluster's origin still lands on the Perseus arm; if the location shifts by more than the arm's width, the interloper claim fails. Independently, measure chemical abundances of its members: Perseus-arm-like abundances would support the visitor interpretation, while Cam OB1-like abundances would argue against it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a region previously noted as one subgroup of Cam OB1 is instead a superposition of three kinematically coherent open clusters, with ages 10 Myr (140 members), 15.8 Myr (469 members), and 20 Myr (184 members), all currently overlapping in position at Galactic coordinates roughly $137^\circ \lessapprox l \lessapprox 145^\circ$, $-2^\circ \lessapprox b \lessapprox 5^\circ$, and distance $\sim$1 kpc. The clusters are derived from first principles by clustering astrometric data in 3D position plus 2D proper-motion space, with available radial velocities added. The authors then integrate each cluster's present-day mean motion backward in the Galaxy to recover its

Load-bearing premise

The birth locations are trustworthy only if integrating the clusters' present-day motions backward through an assumed model of the Galaxy is accurate enough over 10-20 Myr and the clusters were not kicked off course by gas clouds or spiral shocks.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Projected proximity and similar distance are not evidence of common formation: the three Cam OB1 clusters share the sky but not a birthplace.
  • A cluster can travel from the near edge of the Perseus arm into the Cam OB1 region within about 20 Myr, so spiral-arm membership should not be assigned by current position alone.
  • The refined ages (10, 15.8, and 20 Myr) and memberships (140, 469, and 184 stars) provide separate clean samples for studying the region's star formation history.
  • Studies that treat Cam OB1 as one coeval group will need to replace that picture with a line-of-sight superposition of three kinematic populations.
  • The oldest cluster's recovered origin suggests a physical link between Cam OB1 and Per OB1 or Cas OB6 through the near edge of the Perseus arm.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Not stated in the paper, the same treatment could be applied to other mixed-looking associations: if interlopers are common, many nearby OB associations may be superpositions of separately born groups rather than single bursts of star formation.
  • A direct chemical test follows: the 20 Myr cluster should carry abundances resembling Perseus-arm gas rather than Cam OB1 gas; if it does not, the visitor story weakens.
  • As more member stars gain radial velocities, repeating the traceback with fuller six-dimensional phase space would sharpen or revise the birth locations, since the current claim leans on a subset of members with radial-velocity measurements.
  • The result also suggests that spiral-arm features around the solar neighborhood are not static signposts: clusters can be born near an arm, drift across the inter-arm region, and appear today inside an unrelated association.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper identifies three kinematically coherent stellar clusters in the Cam OB1 association from Gaia astrometry, supplemented by SDSS-V radial velocities. It reports cluster ages of 10, 15.8, and 20 Myr with 140, 469, and 184 members, respectively, all currently overlapping in 3D space. Backward orbit integration of the present-day cluster motions is used to claim that the three clusters formed in distinct regions, with the oldest cluster originating near the inner edge of the Perseus arm (toward Per OB1/Cas OB6) and subsequently drifting into the Cam OB1 line of sight. The paper concludes that the clusters had no influence on each other's formation and that distinct stellar groups from different spiral arms can pass through one another.

Significance. If the central traceback result is correct, the paper would provide a striking observational example of an open cluster born in one spiral arm appearing as an interloper in another association, which is of genuine interest for understanding cluster formation, spiral structure, and the reliability of association-based star-formation histories. The use of Gaia astrometry and SDSS-V radial velocities is appropriate, and the combination of 3D positions and 2D proper motions is a reasonable approach for isolating overlapping groups. However, the paper as presented does not yet supply the uncertainty quantification, robustness tests, or falsifiable counterfactuals needed to support the 'distinct origin' and 'Perseus-arm interloper' claims. The manuscript would be strengthened by a clear null-hypothesis test, full RV completeness reporting, and traceback sensitivity analyses.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; §3 (clustering)] The conclusion that each cluster originated in its own distinct region is at risk of being entailed by the cluster definition. The clusters are selected as kinematically coherent groups, so integrating their already distinct mean motions backward will generally send them to separated birth locations. The paper does not present a counterfactual test: for example, what would the traceback look like if the three groups had been drawn from a single initially dispersed association with a common formation site and internal velocity dispersion? Without such a null-hypothesis test, the 'distinct origins / no influence' claim is not yet established. Please specify the observable signature that would have falsified a common origin and provide that test.
  2. [§4 (traceback); Abstract] The traceback to the Perseus arm relies on incomplete radial velocities and an unspecified Galactic potential. The abstract states that clustering used '3D position + 2D velocity space, supplemented by available SDSS-V radial velocities,' implying RV coverage is incomplete. No RV completeness numbers or selection-effect analysis are given. A 5 km/s systematic bias in mean radial velocity shifts a 20 Myr traceback by roughly 100 pc, comparable to the separation between the Cam OB1 association and the near edge of the Perseus arm. The paper must report, per cluster: the number of members with RVs, the uncertainty on the mean RV, and the result of Monte Carlo resampling of member RVs. It must also state the Galactic potential model (axisymmetric? bar? spiral arms?) and show that the inferred birth locations are robust to potential choice and to plausible GMC/spiral-shock perturbations.
  3. [Abstract; Table 1 (cluster parameters)] The ages 10, 15.8, and 20 Myr are quoted without uncertainties, despite the false-precision of '15.8 Myr.' The age ordering is load-bearing because the 'oldest cluster from the Perseus arm' identification depends on it. Isochrone ages of this kind carry significant systematic uncertainty from reddening, metallicity, membership contamination, and choice of stellar models. Please provide credible intervals for each age, a description of the isochrone fitting procedure (including which models and which parameters were free), and a sensitivity test for the traceback conclusion under age variations within those intervals. Similarly, the member counts (140/469/184) need completeness and contamination estimates before they can be used to support the physical picture.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] Typos: 'Camelopardis' should be 'Camelopardalis'; 'Cas 0B6' should be 'Cas OB6.'
  2. [Abstract; §2] The phrase '3D position + 2D velocity space' is confusing: this is 5D (positions plus proper motions), with RVs added later as a supplement. Clarify the dimensionality and state explicitly that radial velocities were not part of the clustering input.
  3. [Various] The phrase 'derive from first principles' is vague and should be removed or replaced with a precise description of the clustering algorithm and its hyperparameters (e.g., HDBSCAN parameters, distance/velocity scaling, membership probability thresholds).
  4. [§2, Table 1] Specify the Gaia data release, astrometric quality cuts (e.g., RUWE, parallax zero-point correction), and whether the distance scale is derived from parallax inversion or a Bayesian prior. Also report the source of the SDSS-V RVs and their typical uncertainties.
  5. [§5 (Discussion)] The claim that the clusters 'exhibited no influence on each other's formation' is stronger than what a traceback of present-day positions can show. Even if birth sites are separated, passage of the older cluster through the Cam OB1 region at an earlier time could in principle have affected the cloud. Soften the claim or add a timing analysis of when each cluster was in the vicinity of the others.
  6. [General] The provided manuscript text contains extensive character corruption in the equations and some table cells; please ensure the production version renders all equations and tables legibly, as I could not fully verify the numerical details from the supplied file.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the traceback is a genuine dynamical calculation, not a restatement of the clustering input.

full rationale

The abstract reports two distinct operations: (1) clustering Gaia stars in 3D position plus 2D velocity space to define three kinematically coherent groups, and (2) integrating the present-day mean motions of those groups backward in a Galactic potential to infer their past positions. The second operation is not a reverse of the first in any equation-level sense: distinct current velocities do not by themselves force distinct birth sites, since a common origin with an expanding velocity field could produce multiple current kinematic groups that converge on traceback. Whether the three groups actually separate or converge is therefore an empirical outcome of the orbit integrations, not an input. The specific Perseus arm visitor claim depends on the chosen Milky Way potential and on the completeness of the SDSS-V radial velocities used to form the 3D space motions. Those are accuracy and validity concerns about the model and data, not circularity: no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no load-bearing result is justified solely by a self-citation. The phrase derive from first principles is rhetorical, but the derivation chain itself is self-contained rather than circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only audit. Three families of unpaid inputs support the central claim: (1) the pre-existing three-cluster partition that the paper refines but does not independently derive; (2) stellar-model isochrone fitting that turns photometry into ages; (3) an assumed Galactic potential and coherence assumption that turn present-day motions into birth sites. None is stated or justified in the abstract.

free parameters (2)
  • Clustering scale/hyperparameters (e.g., HDBSCAN min_cluster_size, epsilon, or equivalent) = not stated in abstract
    The 140/469/184 member partition is the output of a clustering algorithm applied to Gaia positions and proper motions; such algorithms carry scale parameters that control how many groups and how sharp their boundaries are. The abstract gives no values, no separation significance, and no stability tests.
  • Isochrone fit parameters (metallicity, extinction/reddening per member) = none quoted
    Ages of 10, 15.8, and 20 Myr are derived from stellar model fits that require at minimum assumed metallicity and fitted extinction; neither the model grid nor the fitted values appear in the abstract, and no age uncertainties are given.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption An assumed Milky Way gravitational potential (mass model, plausibly with spiral/bar terms) that permits backward orbit integration.
    Abstract: 'Tracing their previous location, based on present-day motions' requires this model; the Perseus-arm birth claim is only as good as the potential used over 10-20 Myr. No model is named.
  • domain assumption The clusters travel as coherent, mostly unperturbed units since birth.
    Back-tracked positions equal birth sites only if stars were not scattered by giant molecular clouds, spiral shocks, or tidal stripping; the abstract's 'no influence on each other's formation' requires ballistic histories.
  • domain assumption The correct number of populations in the region is three (the partition inherited from prior bulk Gaia clustering).
    Abstract: 'we derive from first principles the three proposed clusters' refines an existing 3-group partition; the choice of three is not independently re-derived here, so under- or over-splitting would propagate into ages and origins.
  • domain assumption Standard stellar evolution models map the member photometry to the quoted ages.
    Ages are model-dependent inferences from external isochrone grids, an accepted background input in this field.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Galactic Interloper: A Study of the Cam OB1 Association's Clusters and its Visitor from the Perseus Arm." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CZB6NG6Y

@misc{pith2026250809393,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Galactic Interloper: A Study of the Cam OB1 Association's Clusters and its Visitor from the Perseus Arm},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CZB6NG6Y}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.09393}
}
abstract

Within the molecular clouds of the Camelopardis OB1 association exists a region previously noted as one subgroup. However, bulk clustering from Gaia astrometry has recently shown three distinctive kinematically coherent groups, all found in a similar location in the sky ($137 \lessapprox l\lessapprox145$ and $-2\lessapprox b \lessapprox5$) and at a similar distance ($\sim$1kpc). In this work, we derive from first principles the three proposed clusters in this region, refine the membership list and cluster ages, and, for the first time, examine the 3D structure, motion, and origin of the clusters. Using clustering of Gaia data in 3D position + 2D velocity space, supplemented by available SDSS-V radial velocities, we find the clusters of ages 10, 15.8, and 20 Myr with members numbering 140, 469, and 184, respectively. All three clusters overlap currently in 3D space. Tracing their previous location, based on present-day motions, shows that each cluster originated in its own distinct region and exhibited no influence on each other's formation. Two of the clusters trace their origin to different areas within the Cam OB1 association, with the oldest cluster tracing its origins to the near edge of the Perseus arm, in the direction of the Per OB1 or Cas 0B6 associations. Overall, this work illustrates how different stellar groups, even those originating in a different spiral arm, can visit and pass through each other as they travel through the Galaxy.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    ڴv?JG yqsNl VrRg8o O 6?R GMގE ^Z ? nQY@qcI7z?y

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt \@twocolumntrue 12pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key o...

    work page arXiv 2017

  4. [4]

    P., Tollerud , E

    Astropy Collaboration , Robitaille , T. P., Tollerud , E. J., et al. 2013, title Astropy: A community Python package for astronomy , , 558, A33, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 2013

  5. [5]

    Bailer-Jones , C. A. L., Rybizki , J., Fouesneau , M., Demleitner , M., & Andrae , R. 2021, title Estimating Distances from Parallaxes. V. Geometric and Photogeometric Distances to 1.47 Billion Stars in Gaia Early Data Release 3 , , 161, 147, 10.3847/1538-3881/abd806

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abd806 2021

  6. [6]

    2016, title Study of Eclipsing Binary and Multiple Systems in OB Associations IV: Cas OB6 Member DN Cas , , 33, e046, 10.1017/pasa.2016.36

    Bak s , V., Bak s , H., Bilir , S., & Eker , Z. 2016, title Study of Eclipsing Binary and Multiple Systems in OB Associations IV: Cas OB6 Member DN Cas , , 33, e046, 10.1017/pasa.2016.36

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2016.36 2016

  7. [7]

    Beccari , G., Boffin , H. M. J., Jerabkova , T., et al. 2018, title A sextet of clusters in the Vela OB2 region revealed by Gaia , , 481, L11, 10.1093/mnrasl/sly144

    doi:10.1093/mnrasl/sly144 2018

  8. [8]

    2012, title Age Spread in W3 Main: Large Binocular Telescope/LUCI Near-infrared Spectroscopy of the Massive Stellar Content , , 744, 87, 10.1088/0004-637X/744/2/87

    Bik , A., Henning , T., Stolte , A., et al. 2012, title Age Spread in W3 Main: Large Binocular Telescope/LUCI Near-infrared Spectroscopy of the Massive Stellar Content , , 744, 87, 10.1088/0004-637X/744/2/87

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/744/2/87 2012

Show all 75 references
  1. [9]

    2019, title Age determination for 269 Gaia DR2 open clusters , , 623, A108, 10.1051/0004-6361/201834693

    Bossini , D., Vallenari , A., Bragaglia , A., et al. 2019, title Age determination for 269 Gaia DR2 open clusters , , 623, A108, 10.1051/0004-6361/201834693

    2019 doi

  2. [10]

    2012, title PARSEC: stellar tracks and isochrones with the PAdova and TRieste Stellar Evolution Code , , 427, 127, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21948.x

    Bressan , A., Marigo , P., Girardi , L., et al. 2012, title PARSEC: stellar tracks and isochrones with the PAdova and TRieste Stellar Evolution Code , , 427, 127, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21948.x

    2012

  3. [11]

    2019 a , title A ring in a shell: the large-scale 6D structure of the Vela OB2 complex , , 621, A115, 10.1051/0004-6361/201834003

    Cantat-Gaudin , T., Mapelli , M., Balaguer-N \'u \ n ez , L., et al. 2019 a , title A ring in a shell: the large-scale 6D structure of the Vela OB2 complex , , 621, A115, 10.1051/0004-6361/201834003

    2019 doi

  4. [12]

    2018, title Characterising open clusters in the solar neighbourhood with the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric Solution , , 615, A49, 10.1051/0004-6361/201731251

    Cantat-Gaudin , T., Vallenari , A., Sordo , R., et al. 2018, title Characterising open clusters in the solar neighbourhood with the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric Solution , , 615, A49, 10.1051/0004-6361/201731251

    2018 doi

  5. [13]

    2019 b , title Gaia DR2 unravels incompleteness of nearby cluster population: new open clusters in the direction of Perseus , , 624, A126, 10.1051/0004-6361/201834453

    Cantat-Gaudin , T., Krone-Martins , A., Sedaghat , N., et al. 2019 b , title Gaia DR2 unravels incompleteness of nearby cluster population: new open clusters in the direction of Perseus , , 624, A126, 10.1051/0004-6361/201834453

    2019 doi

  6. [14]

    2020, title Painting a portrait of the Galactic disc with its stellar clusters , , 640, A1, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038192

    Cantat-Gaudin , T., Anders , F., Castro-Ginard , A., et al. 2020, title Painting a portrait of the Galactic disc with its stellar clusters , , 640, A1, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038192

    2020 doi

  7. [15]

    E., & Herbstmeier , U

    Cappa , C. E., & Herbstmeier , U. 2000, title A Search for Interstellar Bubbles surrounding Massive Stars in Perseus OB1 , , 120, 1963, 10.1086/301556

    2000 doi

  8. [16]

    A., Clayton , G

    Cardelli , J. A., Clayton , G. C., & Mathis , J. S. 1989, title The Relationship between Infrared, Optical, and Ultraviolet Extinction , , 345, 245, 10.1086/167900

    1989 doi

  9. [17]

    M., Heyer , M

    Carpenter , J. M., Heyer , M. H., & Snell , R. L. 2000, title Embedded Stellar Clusters in the W3/W4/W5 Molecular Cloud Complex , , 130, 381, 10.1086/317352

    2000 doi

  10. [18]

    2019, title Hunting for open clusters in Gaia DR2: the Galactic anticentre , , 627, A35, 10.1051/0004-6361/201935531

    Castro-Ginard , A., Jordi , C., Luri , X., Cantat-Gaudin , T., & Balaguer-N \'u \ n ez , L. 2019, title Hunting for open clusters in Gaia DR2: the Galactic anticentre , , 627, A35, 10.1051/0004-6361/201935531

    2019 doi

  11. [19]

    2020, title Hunting for open clusters in Gaia DR2: 582 new open clusters in the Galactic disc , , 635, A45, 10.1051/0004-6361/201937386

    Castro-Ginard , A., Jordi , C., Luri , X., et al. 2020, title Hunting for open clusters in Gaia DR2: 582 new open clusters in the Galactic disc , , 635, A45, 10.1051/0004-6361/201937386

    2020 doi

  12. [20]

    2016, title Mesa Isochrones and Stellar Tracks (MIST)

    Choi , J., Dotter , A., Conroy , C., et al. 2016, title Mesa Isochrones and Stellar Tracks (MIST). I. Solar-scaled Models , , 823, 102, 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/102

    2016 doi

  13. [21]

    2010, title The Stellar Population of h and Persei: Cluster Properties, Membership, and the Intrinsic Colors and Temperatures of Stars , , 186, 191, 10.1088/0067-0049/186/2/191

    Currie , T., Hernandez , J., Irwin , J., et al. 2010, title The Stellar Population of h and Persei: Cluster Properties, Membership, and the Intrinsic Colors and Temperatures of Stars , , 186, 191, 10.1088/0067-0049/186/2/191

    2010 doi

  14. [22]

    S., Agertz , O., Berbel , A

    de Jong , R. S., Agertz , O., Berbel , A. A., et al. 2019, title 4MOST: Project overview and information for the First Call for Proposals , The Messenger, 175, 3, 10.18727/0722-6691/5117

    2019 doi

  15. [23]

    T., Hoogerwerf , R., de Bruijne , J

    de Zeeuw , P. T., Hoogerwerf , R., de Bruijne , J. H. J., Brown , A. G. A., & Blaauw , A. 1999, title A HIPPARCOS Census of the Nearby OB Associations , , 117, 354, 10.1086/300682

    1999 doi

  16. [24]

    W., Lyder , D

    Digel , S. W., Lyder , D. A., Philbrick , A. J., Puche , D., & Thaddeus , P. 1996, title A Large-Scale CO Survey toward W3, W4, and W5 , , 458, 561, 10.1086/176839

    1996 doi

  17. [25]

    2011, title Chemical composition of the Taurus-Auriga association , , 526, A103, 10.1051/0004-6361/201015616

    D'Orazi , V., Biazzo , K., & Randich , S. 2011, title Chemical composition of the Taurus-Auriga association , , 526, A103, 10.1051/0004-6361/201015616

    2011 doi

  18. [26]

    2009, title Metallicity of low-mass stars in Orion , , 501, 973, 10.1051/0004-6361/200811241

    D'Orazi , V., Randich , S., Flaccomio , E., et al. 2009, title Metallicity of low-mass stars in Orion , , 501, 973, 10.1051/0004-6361/200811241

    2009 doi

  19. [27]

    2003, title A New Distance Technique for Galactic Plane Objects , , 598, 1005, 10.1086/378947

    Foster , T., & Routledge , D. 2003, title A New Distance Technique for Galactic Plane Objects , , 598, 1005, 10.1086/378947

    2003 doi

  20. [28]

    Gaia Collaboration , Brown , A. G. A., Vallenari , A., et al. 2021, title Gaia Early Data Release 3. Summary of the contents and survey properties , , 649, A1, 10.1051/0004-6361/202039657

    2021 doi

  21. [29]

    V., Koposov , S

    Glushkova , E. V., Koposov , S. E., Zolotukhin , I. Y., et al. 2010, title Automated search for star clusters in large multiband surveys: II. Discovery and investigation of open clusters in the galactic plane , Astronomy Letters, 36, 75, 10.1134/S1063773710020015

    2010 doi

  22. [30]

    D., Cartledge , S., & Clayton , G

    Gordon , K. D., Cartledge , S., & Clayton , G. C. 2009, title FUSE Measurements of Far-Ultraviolet Extinction. III. The Dependence on R(V) and Discrete Feature Limits from 75 Galactic Sightlines , , 705, 1320, 10.1088/0004-637X/705/2/1320

    2009 doi

  23. [31]

    1970, title UBV Observations of luminous stars in three Milky Way fields (Cassiopeia, Camelopardalis and Gemini) , , 1, 35

    Haug , U. 1970, title UBV Observations of luminous stars in three Milky Way fields (Cassiopeia, Camelopardalis and Gemini) , , 1, 35

    1970

  24. [32]

    1979, title H I shells and supershells , , 229, 533, 10.1086/156986

    Heiles , C. 1979, title H I shells and supershells , , 229, 533, 10.1086/156986

    1979 doi

  25. [33]

    C., Gies , D

    Hillwig , T. C., Gies , D. R., Bagnuolo , Jr., W. G., et al. 2006, title Binary and Multiple O-Type Stars in the Cassiopeia OB6 Association , , 639, 1069, 10.1086/499771

    2006 doi

  26. [34]

    Humphreys , R. M. 1978, title Studies of luminous stars in nearby galaxies. I. Supergiants and O stars in the Milky Way. , , 38, 309, 10.1086/190559

    1978 doi

  27. [35]

    L., & Reffert , S

    Hunt , E. L., & Reffert , S. 2023, title Improving the open cluster census. II. An all-sky cluster catalogue with Gaia DR3 , , 673, A114, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346285

    2023 doi

  28. [36]

    L., & Reffert , S

    Hunt , E. L., & Reffert , S. 2024, title Improving the open cluster census. III. Using cluster masses, radii, and dynamics to create a cleaned open cluster catalogue , , 686, A42, 10.1051/0004-6361/202348662

    2024 doi

  29. [37]

    2025, title Gaia Net: Towards robust spectroscopic parameters of stars of all evolutionary stages , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.02958, 10.48550/arXiv.2503.02958

    Huson , D., Cowan , I., Sizemore , L., Kounkel , M., & Hutchinson , B. 2025, title Gaia Net: Towards robust spectroscopic parameters of stars of all evolutionary stages , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.02958, 10.48550/arXiv.2503.02958

    2025 doi arXiv

  30. [38]

    M., et al

    Jordi , C., Gebran , M., Carrasco , J. M., et al. 2010, title Gaia broad band photometry , , 523, A48, 10.1051/0004-6361/201015441

    2010 doi

  31. [39]

    2019, title Untangling the Galaxy

    Kounkel , M., & Covey , K. 2019, title Untangling the Galaxy. I. Local Structure and Star Formation History of the Milky Way , , 158, 122, 10.3847/1538-3881/ab339a

    2019 doi

  32. [40]

    Kounkel , M., Covey , K., & Stassun , K. G. 2020, title Untangling the Galaxy. II. Structure within 3 kpc , , 160, 279, 10.3847/1538-3881/abc0e6

    2020 doi

  33. [41]

    G., Bouma , L

    Kounkel , M., Stassun , K. G., Bouma , L. G., et al. 2022, title Untangling the Galaxy. IV. Empirical Constraints on Angular Momentum Evolution and Gyrochronology for Young Stars in the Field , , 164, 137, 10.3847/1538-3881/ac866d

    2022 doi

  34. [42]

    2018, title The APOGEE-2 Survey of the Orion Star-forming Complex

    Kounkel , M., Covey , K., Su \'a rez , G., et al. 2018, title The APOGEE-2 Survey of the Orion Star-forming Complex. II. Six-dimensional Structure , , 156, 84, 10.3847/1538-3881/aad1f1

    2018 doi

  35. [43]

    2023, title ABYSS

    Kounkel , M., Zari , E., Covey , K., et al. 2023, title ABYSS. I. Targeting Strategy for the APOGEE and BOSS Young Star Survey in SDSS-V , , 266, 10, 10.3847/1538-4365/acc106

    2023 doi

  36. [44]

    Krause , M. G. H., Offner , S. S. R., Charbonnel , C., et al. 2020, title The Physics of Star Cluster Formation and Evolution , , 216, 64, 10.1007/s11214-020-00689-4

    2020 doi

  37. [45]

    J., & Lada , E

    Lada , C. J., & Lada , E. A. 2003, title Embedded Clusters in Molecular Clouds , , 41, 57, 10.1146/annurev.astro.41.011802.094844

    2003 arXiv

  38. [46]

    2008, title On the Formation of Perseus OB1 at High Galactic Latitudes , , 679, 1352, 10.1086/587801

    Lee , H.-T., & Lim , J. 2008, title On the Formation of Perseus OB1 at High Galactic Latitudes , , 679, 1352, 10.1086/587801

    2008 doi

  39. [47]

    2019, title Extended Main-sequence Turnoffs in the Double Cluster h and Persei: The Complex Role of Stellar Rotation , , 876, 65, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab15d2

    Li , C., Sun , W., de Grijs , R., et al. 2019, title Extended Main-sequence Turnoffs in the Double Cluster h and Persei: The Complex Role of Stellar Rotation , , 876, 65, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab15d2

    2019 doi

  40. [48]

    Lian , J., Bergemann , M., Pillepich , A., Zasowski , G., & Lane , R. R. 2023, title The integrated metallicity profile of the Milky Way , Nature Astronomy, 7, 951, 10.1038/s41550-023-01977-z

    2023 doi

  41. [49]

    S., Bessell , M

    Lim , B., Sung , H., Kim , J. S., Bessell , M. S., & Karimov , R. 2014, title Sejong Open Cluster Survey (SOS) - II. IC 1848 cluster in the H II region W5 West , , 438, 1451, 10.1093/mnras/stt2283

    2014 doi

  42. [50]

    P., & Panwar , N

    Lin , C.-C., Chen , W. P., & Panwar , N. 2013, title Characterization of the Young Open Cluster G144.9+0.4 in the Camelopardalis OB1 Association , , 775, 123, 10.1088/0004-637X/775/2/123

    2013 doi

  43. [51]

    2019, title A Catalog of Newly Identified Star Clusters in Gaia DR2 , , 245, 32, 10.3847/1538-4365/ab530a

    Liu , L., & Pang , X. 2019, title A Catalog of Newly Identified Star Clusters in Gaia DR2 , , 245, 32, 10.3847/1538-4365/ab530a

    2019 doi

  44. [52]

    Lyder , D. A. 2001, title The Stars in Camelopardalis OB1: Their Distance and Evolutionary History , , 122, 2634, 10.1086/323705

    2001 doi

  45. [53]

    R., Schiavon , R

    Majewski , S. R., Schiavon , R. P., Frinchaboy , P. M., et al. 2017, title The Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment (APOGEE) , , 154, 94, 10.3847/1538-3881/aa784d

    2017 doi

  46. [54]

    2025, title Metal-rich stellar counterpart of the Radcliffe Wave and the 3D chemical footprints of the Milky Way spiral arms , , 10.1093/mnrasl/slaf075

    Martinez-Medina , L., Poggio , E., & Moreno-Hilario , E. 2025, title Metal-rich stellar counterpart of the Radcliffe Wave and the 3D chemical footprints of the Milky Way spiral arms , , 10.1093/mnrasl/slaf075

    2025 doi

  47. [55]

    2017, title hdbscan: Hierarchical density based clustering , The Journal of Open Source Software, 2, 205, 10.21105/joss.00205

    McInnes , L., Healy , J., & Astels , S. 2017, title hdbscan: Hierarchical density based clustering , The Journal of Open Source Software, 2, 205, 10.21105/joss.00205

    2017 doi

  48. [56]

    M., & Dambis , A

    Melnik , A. M., & Dambis , A. K. 2020, title Internal motions in OB associations with Gaia DR2 , , 493, 2339, 10.1093/mnras/staa454

    2020 doi

  49. [57]

    W., Whitford , A

    Morgan , W. W., Whitford , A. E., & Code , A. D. 1953, title Studies in Galactic Structure. I. a Preliminary Determination of the Space Distribution of the Blue Giants. , , 118, 318, 10.1086/145754

    1953 doi

  50. [58]

    K., et al

    Paunzen , E., Netopil , M., Iliev , I. K., et al. 2005, title CCD photometric search for peculiar stars in open clusters. VI. NGC 1502, NGC 3105, Stock 16, NGC 6268, NGC 7235 and NGC 7510 , , 443, 157, 10.1051/0004-6361:20053287

    2005 doi

  51. [59]

    L., & Janes , K

    Phelps , R. L., & Janes , K. A. 1994, title Young Open Clusters as Probes of the Star Formation Process. I. an Atlas of Open Cluster Photometry , , 90, 31, 10.1086/191857

    1994 doi

  52. [60]

    J., Menten , K

    Reid , M. J., Menten , K. M., Brunthaler , A., et al. 2019, title Trigonometric Parallaxes of High-mass Star-forming Regions: Our View of the Milky Way , , 885, 131, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4a11

    2019 doi

  53. [61]

    2011, title Identifying star clusters in a field: A comparison of different algorithms , Astronomische Nachrichten, 332, 172, 10.1002/asna.201011484

    Schmeja , S. 2011, title Identifying star clusters in a field: A comparison of different algorithms , Astronomische Nachrichten, 332, 172, 10.1002/asna.201011484

    2011 doi

  54. [62]

    2010, title Local kinematics and the local standard of rest , , 403, 1829, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16253.x

    Sch \"o nrich , R., Binney , J., & Dehnen , W. 2010, title Local kinematics and the local standard of rest , , 403, 1829, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16253.x

    2010

  55. [63]

    H., Ann , H

    Sim , G., Lee , S. H., Ann , H. B., & Kim , S. 2019, title 207 New Open Star Clusters within 1 kpc from Gaia Data Release 2 , Journal of Korean Astronomical Society, 52, 145, 10.5303/JKAS.2019.52.5.145

    2019 doi

  56. [64]

    2024, title A Self-consistent Data-driven Model for Determining Stellar Parameters from Optical and Near-infrared Spectra , , 167, 173, 10.3847/1538-3881/ad291d

    Sizemore , L., Llanes , D., Kounkel , M., et al. 2024, title A Self-consistent Data-driven Model for Determining Stellar Parameters from Optical and Near-infrared Spectra , , 167, 173, 10.3847/1538-3881/ad291d

    2024 doi

  57. [65]

    L., Hillenbrand , L

    Slesnick , C. L., Hillenbrand , L. A., & Massey , P. 2002, title The Star Formation History and Mass Function of the Double Cluster h and Persei , , 576, 880, 10.1086/341865

    2002 doi

  58. [66]

    A., Gunn , J

    Smee , S. A., Gunn , J. E., Uomoto , A., et al. 2013, title The Multi-object, Fiber-fed Spectrographs for the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey , , 146, 32, 10.1088/0004-6256/146/2/32

    2013 doi

  59. [67]

    P., Janusz , R., Laugalys , V., & Kazlauskas , A

    Strai z ys , V., Boyle , R. P., Janusz , R., Laugalys , V., & Kazlauskas , A. 2013, title The open cluster IC 1805 and its vicinity: investigation of stars in the Vilnius, IPHAS, 2MASS, and WISE systems , , 554, A3, 10.1051/0004-6361/201321029

    2013 doi

  60. [68]

    2007, title Young Stars in the Camelopardalis Dust and Molecular Clouds

    Strai z ys , V., & Laugalys , V. 2007, title Young Stars in the Camelopardalis Dust and Molecular Clouds. I. The Cam OB1 Association , Baltic Astronomy, 16, 167, 10.48550/arXiv.0803.2461

    2007 doi arXiv

  61. [69]

    1991, title Near-infrared and Stromgren photometry of the open clusters NGC 663, NGC 1502 and NGC 1893

    Tapia , M., Costero , R., Echevarria , J., & Roth , M. 1991, title Near-infrared and Stromgren photometry of the open clusters NGC 663, NGC 1502 and NGC 1893. , , 253, 649, 10.1093/mnras/253.4.649

    1991 doi

  62. [70]

    2022, title Structural parameters of 389 local open clusters , , 659, A59, 10.1051/0004-6361/202142186

    Tarricq , Y., Soubiran , C., Casamiquela , L., et al. 2022, title Structural parameters of 389 local open clusters , , 659, A59, 10.1051/0004-6361/202142186

    2022 doi

  63. [71]

    2003, title The Impact of Ionizing Stars on the Diffuse Interstellar Medium: A Swept-up Shell and Ionized Halo around the W4 Chimney/Superbubble , , 590, 906, 10.1086/375160

    Terebey , S., Fich , M., Taylor , R., Cao , Y., & Hancock , T. 2003, title The Impact of Ionizing Stars on the Diffuse Interstellar Medium: A Swept-up Shell and Ionized Halo around the W4 Chimney/Superbubble , , 590, 906, 10.1086/375160

    2003 doi

  64. [72]

    Weitenbeck , A. J. 1997, title Cross Identification in the Region of Cluster NGC 1502 , , 114, 222, 10.1086/118466

    1997 doi

  65. [73]

    C., Hearty , F., Skrutskie , M

    Wilson , J. C., Hearty , F., Skrutskie , M. F., et al. 2010, title The Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment (APOGEE) high-resolution near-infrared multi-object fiber spectrograph , in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series...

    2010 doi

  66. [74]

    C., Hearty , F

    Wilson , J. C., Hearty , F. R., Skrutskie , M. F., et al. 2019, title The Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment (APOGEE) Spectrographs , , 131, 055001, 10.1088/1538-3873/ab0075

    2019 doi

  67. [75]

    Zhong , J., Chen , L., Kouwenhoven , M. B. N., et al. 2019, title Substructure and halo population of Double Cluster h and Persei , , 624, A34, 10.1051/0004-6361/201834334

    2019 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.