What we should learn from pandemic publishing

Francesco Rinaldi; Francesco Tudisco; Maimuna S. Majumder; Marie-Laure Charpignon; Sagar Kumar; Santo Fortunato; Sara Venturini; Satyaki Sikdar

REVIEW

What we should learn from pandemic publishing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.01838 v1 pith:D2Z2BEE2 submitted 2024-09-24 physics.soc-ph cs.DLq-bio.OT

Satyaki Sikdar , Sara Venturini , Marie-Laure Charpignon , Sagar Kumar , Francesco Rinaldi , Francesco Tudisco , Santo Fortunato , Maimuna S. Majumder This is my paper

classification physics.soc-phcs.DLq-bio.OT

keywords pandemicareasassetauthorscollaborationcovid-19crisesdifferent

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

0 comments

read the original abstract

Authors of COVID-19 papers produced during the pandemic were overwhelmingly not subject matter experts. Such a massive inflow of scholars from different expertise areas is both an asset and a potential problem. Domain-informed scientific collaboration is the key to preparing for future crises.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools