Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 42 references

Cosmic adiabatic photon creation: Temperature law and blackbody spectrum

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-27 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Gravitationally induced adiabatic photon creation produces an extended temperature-redshift law while preserving the Planck blackbody spectrum.

desk verdict The three derivations agree because they all embed the same adiabatic creation rate by construction rather than testing it independently. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.17072 v1 pith:D42533TK submitted 2026-06-09 physics.gen-ph

J.A.S. Lima , S.R.G. Trevisani , R.C. Santos This is my paper
classification physics.gen-ph
keywords photoncreationtemperature-redshiftrelationblackbodyspectrumCMBanisotropiesadiabaticprocessesexpandinguniversecosmologicalthermodynamics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes that three separate routes—heuristic reasoning, macroscopic irreversible thermodynamics, and a modified relativistic Boltzmann equation—all produce the identical extended law relating temperature to redshift when photons are created adiabatically by gravity during cosmic expansion. This law incorporates ongoing photon production without destroying the thermal equilibrium shape of the radiation field. A sympathetic reader would care because the result supplies a concrete, falsifiable alternative to the standard temperature scaling that could be checked against distant observations and might alter how the Hubble tension appears in the thermal data.

What carries the argument

The extended temperature-redshift law obtained by embedding adiabatic gravitational photon creation into thermodynamic and kinetic equations.

What would settle it

A precise measurement of the CMB temperature at a redshift where the extended law and the standard law diverge by more than the observational uncertainty.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

All three methods converge on the same extended temperature law. The kinetic treatment shows that the Planckian spectrum is preserved throughout the expansion, so that anisotropies and spectral distortions remain describable within the same framework. The new relation therefore supplies a direct test of the thermal sector of the concordance model and a possible avenue for examining the present H0 discrepancy between supernovae and CMB inferences.

Load-bearing premise

Photon creation must occur adiabatically and must be incorporable into the thermodynamic and kinetic descriptions without breaking other established cosmological constraints.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The blackbody spectrum of the cosmic microwave background remains exactly Planckian despite ongoing photon creation.
  • Anisotropies and spectral distortions of the CMB can still be calculated consistently within the same kinetic description.
  • Temperature measurements at different redshifts become a direct test of the standard concordance model in its thermal sector.
  • The same temperature law offers a possible route for re-examining the H0 tension between local and early-universe determinations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • High-redshift temperature data could distinguish the extended law from the standard one without requiring new particle physics.
  • The kinetic treatment may generalize to other conserved quantities or to non-Friedmann backgrounds where similar creation terms appear.
  • If the law holds, the inferred photon number density at early times would be higher than in the standard picture, altering derived quantities such as the baryon-to-photon ratio.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that gravitationally induced adiabatic photon creation in the expanding universe leads to an extended temperature-redshift relation T(z) that can be derived consistently via three routes: (i) a heuristic approach, (ii) irreversible thermodynamics with a photon-creation term, and (iii) a modified relativistic Boltzmann equation that also preserves the Planck spectrum while allowing treatment of anisotropies and distortions. All three methods are asserted to yield identical results, providing a potential test of the standard LambdaCDM model and a route to address the H0 tension.

Significance. If the derivations prove independent and the adiabatic-creation premise is consistent with gravitational dynamics, the result would supply a concrete, falsifiable modification to the standard T(z) = T0(1+z) law while keeping the blackbody form intact—an uncommon combination in alternative cosmologies. The kinetic treatment's claim to handle CMB anisotropies and distortions is a notable strength if demonstrated explicitly. The work's value hinges on whether the convergence is non-circular; absent that, the significance is limited to a heuristic re-derivation rather than a new physical mechanism.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and kinetic section] Abstract and the section presenting the kinetic treatment: the claim that the three methods are independent is load-bearing for the central result, yet the photon-creation term added to the Boltzmann equation is introduced to enforce the same adiabatic condition already used in the thermodynamic derivation; without an independent derivation of that term from the Einstein equations or QFT in curved space, the numerical agreement does not constitute an independent test.
  2. [Irreversible thermodynamics section] The section on irreversible thermodynamics: the functional form of the creation rate is not derived from first principles but normalized to produce the desired extended T(z); this makes the agreement across methods tautological by construction rather than a convergence of distinct physical assumptions.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that 'CMB anisotropies and distortions can be treated properly' but provides no explicit equation or section reference showing how the modified collision term affects the usual Sachs-Wolfe or integrated Sachs-Wolfe contributions.
  2. [Heuristic approach section] Notation for the creation rate (often denoted Ψ or similar) should be introduced with a clear equation in the first method section to allow direct comparison across the three derivations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and for identifying the key issue of methodological independence. We respond to each major comment below, acknowledging where clarification is needed while defending the consistency of the results across complementary frameworks.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and kinetic section] Abstract and the section presenting the kinetic treatment: the claim that the three methods are independent is load-bearing for the central result, yet the photon-creation term added to the Boltzmann equation is introduced to enforce the same adiabatic condition already used in the thermodynamic derivation; without an independent derivation of that term from the Einstein equations or QFT in curved space, the numerical agreement does not constitute an independent test.

    Authors: The three approaches address the problem at distinct levels of description. The heuristic method is phenomenological. The irreversible-thermodynamics route derives the extended T(z) from the creation-pressure term in the energy-balance equation. The kinetic treatment then inserts a creation term into the Boltzmann equation and demonstrates, as a non-trivial result, that the Planck spectrum is preserved and that anisotropies/distortions remain tractable. While the functional form of the creation term is chosen for consistency with the adiabatic premise, the spectrum-preservation property is not presupposed in the kinetic equation and emerges from the structure of the modified collision integral. We agree that a derivation of the creation term directly from the Einstein equations or QFT in curved space would strengthen the claim of independence; such a derivation is not provided here. We will revise the abstract and kinetic section to replace the word “independent” with “complementary” and to state explicitly the logical relation among the three routes. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Irreversible thermodynamics section] The section on irreversible thermodynamics: the functional form of the creation rate is not derived from first principles but normalized to produce the desired extended T(z); this makes the agreement across methods tautological by construction rather than a convergence of distinct physical assumptions.

    Authors: The creation rate is fixed by the physical hypothesis of adiabatic photon creation (zero entropy production per photon), which is the central assumption of the paper rather than an arbitrary normalization chosen to fit a pre-selected T(z). Once this rate is adopted, the thermodynamic derivation yields a definite extended temperature law. The kinetic calculation then shows that the same law is compatible with preservation of the blackbody spectrum—an outcome that is not automatic and constitutes an independent consistency check. We will add a paragraph in the thermodynamics section clarifying that the rate is dictated by the adiabatic condition and that the subsequent agreement with kinetic theory is therefore a non-trivial verification rather than a tautology. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • A first-principles derivation of the photon-creation term from the Einstein equations or from QFT in curved spacetime is not supplied in the manuscript and cannot be supplied within the scope of the present work.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Kinetic derivation incorporates the same adiabatic creation term used in thermodynamic approach, making agreement non-independent

  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "It is found that the same extended temperature law can be derived based on three independent methods, namely: (i) through a simple heuristic approach, (ii) based on macroscopic irreversible thermodynamics with photon creation, and (iii) using a kinetic relativistic Boltzmann equation incorporating gravitational photon creation. All these methods yield the same answer. The modified kinetic treatment reveals not only that the Planckian blackbody spectrum endowed with the adiabatic creation is preserved"

    The Boltzmann equation is modified by 'incorporating gravitational photon creation' whose rate is not independently derived but selected to reproduce the adiabatic creation already used in method (ii). Consequently the identical T(z) and spectrum preservation is enforced by construction rather than emerging from the kinetic equation itself.

full rationale

The paper presents three methods (heuristic, irreversible thermodynamics, modified Boltzmann) as independent derivations of the same extended T(z) law and preserved Planck spectrum. However, the Boltzmann equation is modified by adding a photon creation term whose functional form is chosen to enforce the adiabatic condition already assumed in the thermodynamic derivation. This makes the numerical agreement a direct consequence of the shared input rather than an independent confirmation. The abstract explicitly states the methods 'yield the same answer' after 'incorporating gravitational photon creation,' but provides no derivation of the creation rate from Einstein equations or QFT; it is introduced to match the prior result. No self-citations or external uniqueness theorems are invoked, but the central claim reduces to a fitted-input-called-prediction pattern.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that gravitationally induced adiabatic photon creation occurs and can be modeled consistently; no free parameters or invented entities are identifiable from the abstract alone.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Gravitationally induced photon production occurs adiabatically in the expanding universe and can be incorporated into thermodynamic and kinetic descriptions.
    This premise is required for all three methods to yield the same extended temperature law.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Cosmic adiabatic photon creation: Temperature law and blackbody spectrum." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/D42533TK

@misc{pith2026260617072,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Cosmic adiabatic photon creation: Temperature law and blackbody spectrum},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/D42533TK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.17072}
}
read the original abstract

The temperature-redshift relation (cosmic thermometer) is rediscussed in the framework of gravitationally induced photon production in the expanding universe. It is found that the same extended temperature law can be derived based on three independent methods, namely: (i) through a simple heuristic approach, (ii) based on macroscopic irreversible thermodynamics with photon creation, and (iii) using a kinetic relativistic Boltzmann equation incorporating gravitational photon creation. All these methods yield the same answer. The modified kinetic treatment reveals not only that the Planckian blackbody spectrum endowed with the adiabatic creation is preserved in the course of the expansion but also that CMB anisotropies and distortions can be treated properly. The new cosmic thermometer suggests a crucial test to the standard cosmic concordance model in the thermal sector. It is also argued that the present results may open a new route for scrutinising the H0 Supernovae-CMB tension challenging the LambdaCDM model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.17072 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Likelihood for constant photon creation rate. The second law of thermo￾dynamics constrains 0 to positive values. This means that the free parameter α = 0/3H0 is also positive. Using the best fit of α (see text), we find 0 0.04H0. where N0, T0 are present day values, α = 0/3H0 and F (m, z) = 1 1 1+z [mx−1+(1−m)x2)] −1/2dx. As expected, the photon creation process implies that N(z) ≤ N0. Both quantities N(z) and T … view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Abbott, et al., Astrophys

    T.M.C. Abbott, et al., Astrophys. J. Lett. 872 (2019) L30

    2019

  2. [2]

    Aghanim, et al., Planck results 2018, Astron

    N. Aghanim, et al., Planck results 2018, Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6

    2018

  3. [3]

    Weinberg, Rev

    S. Weinberg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 61 (1989) 1

    1989

  4. [4]

    Steinhardt, in: V.L

    P.J. Steinhardt, in: V.L. Fitch, D.R. Marlow, M.A.E. Dementi (Eds.), Critical Prob- lems in Physics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 1997; P.J. Steinhardt, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 361 (2003) 2497

    1997

  5. [5]

    Carvalho, J.S

    F.C. Carvalho, J.S. Alcaniz, J.A.S. Lima, R. Silva, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 081301; J.C. Carvalho, J.A.S. Lima, I. Waga, Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 2404

    2006

  6. [6]

    Sahni, A

    V. Sahni, A. Starobinsky, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 15 (2006) 2105

    2006

  7. [7]

    Samuel, S

    J. Samuel, S. Sinha, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 161302

    2006

  8. [8]

    Lombrise, Phys

    L. Lombrise, Phys. Lett. B 797 (2019) 134804

    2019

Show all 42 references
  1. [9]

    Riess, et al., Astrophys

    A.G. Riess, et al., Astrophys. J. 876 (2019) 85

    2019

  2. [10]

    Cunha, L

    J.V. Cunha, L. Marassi, J.A.S. Lima, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 379 (2007) L1; J.A.S. Lima, J.V. Cunha, Astrophys. J. Lett. 781 (2014) L38

    2007

  3. [11]

    Birrer, et al., Mon

    S. Birrer, et al., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 484 (2019) 4726

    2019

  4. [12]

    Mortsell, A

    E. Mortsell, A. Goobar, J. Johansson, S. Dhawan, arXiv:2105 .11461 [astro -ph .CO]

  5. [13]

    Ivanov, Y

    M.M. Ivanov, Y. Ali-Haïmoud, J. Lesgourgues, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 063515

    2020

  6. [14]

    Mather, et al., Astrophys

    J.C. Mather, et al., Astrophys. J. 512 (1999) 511

    1999

  7. [15]

    Fixen, Astrophys

    D.J. Fixen, Astrophys. J. 707 (2009) 916

    2009

  8. [16]

    Weinberg, General Relativity and Cosmology, Wiley, 1972

    S. Weinberg, General Relativity and Cosmology, Wiley, 1972

    1972

  9. [17]

    Steigman, Astrophys

    G. Steigman, Astrophys. J. 221 (1978) 407

    1978

  10. [18]

    Kolb, M.S

    E.W. Kolb, M.S. Turner, The Early Universe, Addison Wesley, Redwood City, 1990

    1990

  11. [19]

    Dodelson, Modern Cosmology, Academic Press, 2003

    S. Dodelson, Modern Cosmology, Academic Press, 2003

    2003

  12. [20]

    Fu, et al., Unlocking the synergy between CMB spectral distortions and anisotropies, arXiv:2006 .12886v1

    H. Fu, et al., Unlocking the synergy between CMB spectral distortions and anisotropies, arXiv:2006 .12886v1

    2006

  13. [21]

    Prigogine, et al., Gen

    I. Prigogine, et al., Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 21 (1989) 767

    1989

  14. [22]

    Calvão, J.A.S

    M.O. Calvão, J.A.S. Lima, I. Waga, Phys. Lett. A 162 (1992) 223; J.A.S. Lima, A.S.M. Germano, Phys. Lett. A 170 (1992) 373. See also J.A.S. Lima, M.O. Calvão, I. Waga, Cosmology, thermodynamics and matter creation, in: Frontier Physics, Essays in Honor of Jayme Tiomno, World S...

    1992

  15. [23]

    Zeldovich, JETP Lett

    Ya.B. Zeldovich, JETP Lett. 12 (1970) 307

    1970

  16. [24]

    Lima, Gen

    J.A.S. Lima, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 29 (1997) 805, arXiv:gr-qc /9605056; J.A.S. Lima, A.S.M. Germano, L.R. Abramo, Phys. Rev. D 53 (1996) 4287, arXiv: gr-qc /9511006v1

    1997

  17. [25]

    J.A.S. Lima, I. Baranov, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 043515

    2014

  18. [26]

    Parker, D

    L. Parker, D. Toms, Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetimes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2009

    2009

  19. [27]

    Landau, E.M

    L.D. Landau, E.M. Lifshitz, Statistical Physics, Pergamon Press, England, 1985

    1985

  20. [28]

    Chubla, Mon

    J. Chubla, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 443 (2014) 1881

    2014

  21. [29]

    Ota, Phys

    A. Ota, Phys. Lett. B 790 (2019) 243

    2019

  22. [30]

    Ali-Haïmoud, Phys

    Y. Ali-Haïmoud, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 043541

    2021

  23. [31]

    Kogut, et al., CMB spectral distortions: status and prospects, Astro2020 APC white paper, arXiv:1907.13195v1 [astro -ph .CO]

    A. Kogut, et al., CMB spectral distortions: status and prospects, Astro2020 APC white paper, arXiv:1907.13195v1 [astro -ph .CO]

    1907

  24. [32]

    Sunyaev, Ya.B

    R.A. Sunyaev, Ya.B. Zeldovich, Astrophys. Space Sci. 7 (1970) 3

    1970

  25. [33]

    J.A.S. Lima, S. Viegas, A.I. Silva, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 312 (2000) 747

    2000

  26. [34]

    J. Cui, J. Bechtold, J. Ge, D.M. Meyer, Astrophys. J. 633 (2005) 649

    2005

  27. [35]

    Luzzi, et al., Astrophys

    G. Luzzi, et al., Astrophys. J. 705 (2009) 1122

    2009

  28. [36]

    Noterdaeme, et al., Astron

    P. Noterdaeme, et al., Astron. Astrophys. 526 (2011) L7

    2011

  29. [37]

    Muller, et al., Astron

    S. Muller, et al., Astron. Astrophys. 551 (2013) A109

    2013

  30. [38]

    Hurier, et al., Astron

    G. Hurier, et al., Astron. Astrophys. 561 (2014) A143

    2014

  31. [39]

    Komatsu, S

    N. Komatsu, S. Kimura, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 043507

    2015

  32. [40]

    Avgoustidis, et al., Phys

    A. Avgoustidis, et al., Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 043521

    2016

  33. [41]

    Lima, Phys

    J.A.S. Lima, Phys. Rev. D 54 (1996) 2571

    1996

  34. [42]

    Trevisani, J.A.S

    S.R.G. Trevisani, J.A.S. Lima, 2021, in preparation. 5

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed June 27, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.