Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 46 references

Almost optimal well-posedness for Chern--Simons gauged $O(3)$ sigma model under the Lorenz gauge

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proves local well-posedness for the Chern–Simons gauged O(3) sigma model in one and two space dimensions at regularity thresholds just above the scaling-critical exponents, improving prior results by one quarter of a derivative.

desk verdict 2D null-structure decomposition is a real step forward; the 1D linear estimate has a scaling error that breaks the contraction argument as written. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.16792 v1 pith:D5BYZMYD submitted 2026-07-18 math.AP

Huali Zhang , Jie Zhou This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35L7035A01
keywords Chern–SimonsgaugedO(3)sigmamodelLorenzgaugelocalwell-posednesslowregularitynullformswave–SobolevspacesX^{sb}scaling-critical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes local well-posedness for the Chern–Simons gauged O(3) sigma model under the Lorenz gauge in 1D and 2D at almost scaling-critical regularities: H^s × H^{s-1} for s>1/2 in one dimension, and H^s × H^{s-3/4} for s>1 in two dimensions. Each threshold is a quarter derivative below the previous best result, putting the matter field arbitrarily close to the H^{1/2}(R) and H^{1}(R^2) scaling-invariant exponents. A sympathetic reader would care because it suggests the gauge coupling does not create an intrinsic regularity barrier, and that the earlier losses came from incomplete exploitation of the null structure. The proofs work by converting all derivative nonlinearities into null forms via an auxiliary gauge-like field, then applying sharp bilinear estimates.

What carries the argument

The auxiliary vector field Bμ (defined in 2D by ∂μBμ=0 and ∂μBν−∂νBμ=ε_{μνρ}A^ρ, with A recovered as Aρ=ε^{μνρ}∂μBν) is the central object: it converts the interactions AμAμ and ε^{μνρ}Aρ∂νφ into Q0 and Qαβ null forms, for which sharp bilinear product estimates exist. In 1D, the same auxiliary-field idea is used inside the anisotropic X^{s,b} spaces, where the paper proves a direct linear estimate (Proposition 3.1) that avoids the usual finite-propagation reduction and supplies the contraction factor for large data.

What would settle it

For an explicit solution A of the 2D wave equation with data in H^{s−3/4}, solve the auxiliary wave equation □Bν = ε^{μνρ}∂μAρ with the constraints from (2.4) and check whether the claimed bound |B|_{s+1/4,b} ≤ C|A|_{s−3/4,b} actually holds; one counterexample would invalidate the 2D threshold. In 1D, writing the Picard map for A explicitly (the paper omits it) and testing whether it is a contraction in X^{s−1,b} would settle the 1D claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Under the Lorenz gauge, the Chern–Simons gauged O(3) sigma equations become a coupled system of semilinear wave equations whose derivative nonlinearities, after introducing an auxiliary vector field B, are all expressible as the null forms Q0 and Qαβ. This complete null structure, combined with bilinear estimates in wave–Sobolev spaces (2D) and a new direct linear energy estimate in the X^{s,b} null-coordinate spaces (1D), yields local well-posedness by contraction mapping at (φ0, A0) ∈ H^s × H^{s−1} for s>1/2 in 1D and (φ0, A0) ∈ H^s × H^{s−3/4} for s>1 in 2D.

Load-bearing premise

The argument hinges on the claim that the auxiliary field B captures the gauge potential A with one extra derivative of regularity (B in H^{s+1/4} for A in H^{s−3/4} in 2D, and B in X^{s,b} for A in X^{s−1,b} in 1D), and that in one dimension A can actually be recovered from B in the fixed-point argument — a recovery the paper never writes down.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If correct, the matter field is locally well-posed at any H^s with s>1 in 2D and s>1/2 in 1D, one quarter derivative below the previous thresholds and arbitrarily close to the scaling-critical regularity.
  • The gauge field regularity in 2D, H^{s−3/4}, is the natural companion to s>1 for the coupled system; in 1D both matter and gauge fields end up almost at their scaling-invariant exponents.
  • The complete null-form decomposition means the 2D system can be handled by a unified set of bilinear estimates, rather than treating each derivative interaction separately.
  • The direct X^{s,b} linear estimate extends the range of 1D wave-map-type equations that can be solved by simple Picard iteration without a small-data reduction.
  • These are existence results for general (not small) initial data, with time T depending continuously on the data.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The 1D argument leaves the map from B back to A implicit; supplying that map explicitly with the claimed regularity would likely close the endpoint s=1/2, since the current contraction bound uses a norm on A that is never defined.
  • The same auxiliary-field null-form strategy could be transported to other Chern–Simons–matter models (e.g., the Higgs or Dirac couplings) to see whether a quarter-derivative improvement is available there too.
  • A natural endpoint test in 2D is whether the s>1 threshold is a genuine limit of the H^{s,b} product calculus; reaching the scaling-critical s=1 for A would probably require U^p/V^p type spaces or a different geometric reformulation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the low-regularity Cauchy problem for the Chern–Simons gauged O(3) sigma model under the Lorenz gauge in R^{1+1} and R^{1+2}. It reformulates the systems as wave equations, identifies null structures, and introduces an auxiliary field B^μ so that the derivative nonlinearities are written as null forms. The main theorems claim local well-posedness for (φ0,φ1,A0) ∈ H^s(R)×H^{s-1}(R)×H^{s-1}(R) with s>1/2 in one dimension, and for (φ0,φ1,A0) ∈ H^s(R^2)×H^{s-1}(R^2)×H^{s-3/4}(R^2) with s>1 in two dimensions, improving previous results of Jin–Huh and Jin–Zhang by one quarter of a derivative. The proofs are based on Picard iteration, using a linear estimate in H^{s,b} for the 2D case and a new X^{s,b} linear estimate for the 1D case, together with bilinear product estimates for null forms.

Significance. If correct, the results would be a substantial step toward the scaling-critical well-posedness for a coupled Chern–Simons matter system, and the complete two-dimensional null-form decomposition is a valuable structural contribution. The paper is clearly organized, the claimed thresholds are explicit and falsifiable, and the use of the Keel–Tao X^{s,b} framework in 1D is a promising idea. However, the proof as written has several load-bearing gaps: the stress-test concern about the 1D linear estimate is valid and lands, and I also find that the 1D gauge-field recovery map is never defined and that some 2D product embeddings are asserted without verification and fail for part of the claimed range. These issues presently prevent the paper from establishing its two main theorems.

major comments (4)
  1. [§5.3, Proposition 5.1 (proof of Proposition 3.1)] The claimed bound C_T ≲ C_χ T^{1/8} at the end of §5.3 is not a consequence of the preceding estimates. With c ≃ T^{-1/4} and ∥t^j θ_T∥_{H^{s+b}} ≃ T^{j+1/2-s-b}, the j=1 term in the first series of C_T behaves like c^{5/2-s-b} T^{3/2-s-b} ≃ T^{7/8 - 3(s+b)/4}. This is an inverse power of T whenever s+b>7/6, e.g. for s=1, b=3/5. Hence C_T → ∞ as T→0, and the displayed conclusion C_T ≤ C_χ T^{1/8} is false in that range. Since the contraction in the 1D fixed-point argument depends on this positive power of T, Theorem 1.1 is not justified for a substantial part of the stated range s>1/2.
  2. [§4.2] The one-dimensional Picard map is never defined on the gauge field A. The solution space in (4.10) includes A ∈ X^{s-1,b}, and the contraction estimate (4.22) uses ∥MA−MD∥_{X^{s-1,b}}, but the localized equations (4.11)–(4.13) only define Mφ, MB0, MB1 and MN. The 1D reconstruction of A from B (for instance A0 = ∂tB1 − ∂1B0, A1 = ∂1B1 − ∂tB0, which is compatible with (2.16)) is not stated, and no Lipschitz estimate for this recovery map is proved. Without this, the contraction for the gauge component is unjustified. This is repairable, but it must be written out.
  3. [§4.1, Step 3] The product embeddings asserted for Q0(Bμ,Bμ) do not follow from Lemma 3.2 for the full range s>1 claimed in Theorem 1.2. For the first embedding H^{s-3/4,b}·H^{s+1/4-ϵ,b}→H^{s-1,b}, Lemma 3.2 requires s0+s1+s2 > (d+1)/4. With s0=1-s, s1=s-3/4, s2=s+1/4-ϵ, this becomes s-1/2-ϵ > 3/4, i.e. s>5/4+ϵ. The second displayed embedding has the same s-sum. Thus the Step-3 estimate ∥Q0(B,B)∥_{s-1,b+ϵ-1} ≲ |B|^2_{s+1/4,b} is not established for 1<s≤5/4, which is exactly the new range of Theorem 1.2. Please provide an explicit verification or a different decomposition.
  4. [§4.2, Eqs. (4.17)–(4.19)] The estimates (4.17)–(4.18) place Q0(f,g) and Q1(f,g) in H^{s-1}_u H^{b-1}_v, and by symmetry in X^{s-1,b-1}. However, the linear estimates used in (4.14)–(4.16) require the nonlinearities in X^{s-1,b+ϵ-1}. Since b+ϵ-1 > b-1, the space X^{s-1,b+ϵ-1} is strictly smaller than X^{s-1,b-1}, so the displayed bounds do not imply (4.19)–(4.21). An additional gain in the Λ_- regularity is needed. This is a second independent obstruction in the 1D iteration.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Theorems 1.1 and 1.2] The theorems list only a_μ as the gauge initial datum, but the wave system is second-order in A and the solution space (4.1) uses ∂_tA|t=0 = ˙a with ˙a ∈ H^{s-7/4} in 2D. The Lorenz condition and the constraint equations may determine ˙a from (φ0,φ1,a), but this should be stated explicitly so that the Cauchy problem is fully specified.
  2. [§4.2, first paragraph] The text says 'We first apply the linear estimates established in Lemma 3.1' before quoting X^{s,b} estimates. In the 1D setting this should refer to Proposition 3.1, not the 2D Lemma 3.1.
  3. [Throughout] There are numerous typos and grammatical slips, e.g. 'dy in iffer substantiallthe' in the introduction, 'scaling-inavriant' in Remark 1.1, and 'sapce-time' in §5.3. Also, 'θ<1' near the final estimate in §5.3 appears to be a typo for 'T<1'.
  4. [§4.1, Step 1] The notation in the null-form estimates mixes D_+, D_-, Λ_+, Λ_- without consistently indicating which spaces are homogeneous; this makes verification of the claimed embeddings harder. Please clarify the conventions where D_+ is used in Step 1.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the argument is a self-contained fixed-point proof using external linear and bilinear estimates; self-citation appears only as a baseline, not as load-bearing evidence.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain: the paper reformulates the CS-O(3) sigma system into wave equations under the Lorenz gauge (Section 5), introduces the auxiliary field Bμ via the explicit linear wave equation (2.3)–(2.5) with the inverse correspondence Aρ = ε^{μνρ}∂μBν (2.6), and then proves nonlinear estimates using the external estimates of Selberg [35], D'Ancona–Foschi–Selberg [1], and Keel–Tao [29]. There is no fitted parameter that is later renamed as a prediction, and no central claim reduces to its definition by construction. The scaling-invariance discussion in Remark 1.1 is a consistency check, not an input into the estimates. The self-citation [23] (Jin–Zhang) is used as the previous result being improved and as a source of the already-known null-structure identity; the new 2D null decomposition and the 1D X^{s,b} energy estimate are derived in the paper itself, so the self-citation is not load-bearing for the improved thresholds. The manuscript does contain a genuine gap in the 1D contraction argument: the solution map is defined for φ, B0, B1, N in (4.11)–(4.13), yet the difference estimate (4.22) uses ∥MA − MD∥_{X^{s-1,b}} without defining MA or the recovery map from B to A. Likewise, the derivation of CT ≲ T^{1/8} in §5.3 is asserted through a scaling relation whose validity for the stated range of s+b is questionable. These are correctness concerns, not circularity: they do not make the claimed result true by definition or by importing the conclusion into the hypotheses. Therefore no circular step meeting the required evidentiary standard can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The derivation rests on the cited product and linear estimates (Lemmas 3.2, 3.3, 3.1) and on the B-field correspondence; no free parameters are fitted. The B-field is an auxiliary mathematical device rather than a new physical entity.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Product estimates in wave–Sobolev spaces (Lemma 3.2, D'Ancona–Foschi–Selberg) apply to all exponent matrices used in Section 4.1.
    The 2D nonlinear estimates in Steps 1–5 are reduced to these embeddings; the paper asserts 'All these estimates follow from Lemma 3.2' without checking conditions.
  • standard math Keel–Tao product estimates (Lemma 3.3) apply with exponents s−1, b−1 and b, b in the 1D null-form bounds.
    Used in (4.17)–(4.18) to bound null forms in X^{s,b}; requires s−1 ≤ b and b > 1/2.
  • standard math Selberg linear estimates (Lemma 3.1, Theorem 13 of [35]) hold in time-restricted spaces with the T^{ε/4} factor.
    Used for the 2D linear estimates (4.5).
  • domain assumption The B-field auxiliary system (2.2)–(2.6) gives a one-to-one correspondence between A and B with the stated regularity gain in 2D; a similar correspondence holds in 1D.
    Entered in Section 2; the 1D analog is not stated explicitly, and the fixed-point map for A is not defined.
  • domain assumption Initial data constraints (⟨φ0,φ1⟩=0, ˙a determined by φ0,φ1,a via gauge equations) are sufficient for the wave-equation formulation.
    The theorems state only φ0,φ1,a; ∂tA data are not listed but are needed for the wave equations (1.7).
  • standard math Null-form estimates of Klainerman–Selberg (Lemmas 7.6 and 8.1 of [28]) reduce Q0 and Qαβ estimates to product estimates with no loss.
    Invoked in the 2D proof without restatement.
invented entities (2)
  • Auxiliary vector field Bμ
    purpose: Rewrites all derivative nonlinearities in the Chern–Simons gauge coupling as Klainerman null forms; B satisfies a wave equation sourced by A (2D) and by N (1D).
    Mathematical device introduced in Section 2; no falsifiable physical handle; it is a gauge/auxiliary field, not a new physical entity.
  • Auxiliary scalar field N (1D model)
    purpose: Encodes the gauge field strength F01 in the one-dimensional reduction; appears in the reduced equations (1.8)–(1.11).
    Part of the 1D model's structure, not an independently measurable quantity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Almost optimal well-posedness for Chern--Simons gauged $O(3)$ sigma model under the Lorenz gauge." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/D5BYZMYD

@misc{pith2026260716792,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Almost optimal well-posedness for Chern--Simons gauged $O(3)$ sigma model under the Lorenz gauge},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/D5BYZMYD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.16792}
}
abstract

In this paper, we study the low-regularity Cauchy problem for the Chern--Simons gauged $O(3)$ sigma model in $\mathbb{R}^{1+d}$ ($d=1,2$) under the Lorenz gauge. For $d=1$, we establish local well-posedness for initial data $(\boldsymbol{\phi}_0,\mathbf{A}_0)\in H^{s_1}(\mathbb{R})\times H^{s_1-1}(\mathbb{R})$ with $s_1>\frac12$. This improves the previous result of Jin and Huh \cite{HJ} by one quarter of a derivative and is almost optimal in view of the scaling-invariant regularities $\dot H^{1/2}(\mathbb{R})$ for the matter field and $\dot H^{-1/2}(\mathbb{R})$ for the gauge field. For $d=2$, we establish local well-posedness for initial data $(\boldsymbol{\phi}_0,\mathbf{A}_0)\in H^{s_2}(\mathbb{R}^2)\times H^{s_2-\frac34}(\mathbb{R}^2)$ with $s_2>1$. This improves the previous result of Jin and Zhang \cite{JZ} by one quarter of a derivative and brings the regularity threshold close to the scaling-invariant exponents $\dot H^{1}(\mathbb{R}^2)$ and $\dot H^{0}(\mathbb{R}^2)$ for the matter and gauge fields, respectively. The analysis relies on two main ingredients. In two space dimensions, we identify the complete null structure of the derivative nonlinearities, allowing the entire system to be treated within a unified null-form framework. In one space dimension, we establish a direct energy estimate in the function space introduced by Keel and Tao, avoiding the finite-propagation reduction to a small-data problem and enabling the low-regularity iteration for general initial data.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    D’Ancona, D

    P. D’Ancona, D. Foschi, and S. Selberg,Product estimates for wave–Sobolev spaces in2 + 1and1 + 1 dimensions, Contemp. Math.526(2010), 125–150

    2010

  2. [2]

    Andersson and L

    L. Andersson and L. Kapitanski,Cauchy problem for incompressible neo-Hookean materials, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.247(2023), no. 2, Paper No. 21, 76 pp

    2023

  3. [3]

    Arthur, D

    K. Arthur, D. H. Tchrakian, and Y. Yang,Topological and nontopological self-dual Chern-Simons solitons in a gaugedO(3)σmodel, Phys. Rev. D54(1996), no. 8, 5245–5258

    1996

  4. [4]

    Berg´ e, A

    L. Berg´ e, A. de Bouard, and J.-C. Saut,Blowing up time-dependent solutions of the planar, Chern-Simons gauged nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Nonlinearity8(1995), no. 2, 235–253

    1995

  5. [5]

    Chae and K

    D. Chae and K. Choe,Global existence in the Cauchy problem of the relativistic Chern-Simons-Higgs theory, Nonlinearity15(2002), no. 3, 747–758

    2002

  6. [6]

    Chern, Z.-Y

    J.-L. Chern, Z.-Y. Chen, and H.-Y. Shen,Classification of solutions for self-dual Chern-SimonsCP(1) model, J. Math. Phys.62(2021), no. 3, Paper No. 031510, 25 pp

    2021

  7. [7]

    Choe and J

    K. Choe and J. Han,Existence and properties of radial solutions in the self-dual Chern-SimonsO(3)sigma model, J. Math. Phys.52(2011), no. 8, 082301, 20 pp

    2011

  8. [8]

    Choe et al.,Uniqueness and solution structure of nonlinear equations arising from the Chern-Simons gaugedO(3)sigma models, J

    K. Choe et al.,Uniqueness and solution structure of nonlinear equations arising from the Chern-Simons gaugedO(3)sigma models, J. Differential Equations255(2013), no. 8, 2136–2166

    2013

Show all 46 references
  1. [9]

    Choe et al.,Bubbling solutions for the Chern-Simons gaugedO(3)sigma model on a torus, Calc

    K. Choe et al.,Bubbling solutions for the Chern-Simons gaugedO(3)sigma model on a torus, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations54(2015), no. 2, 1275–1329

    2015

  2. [10]

    Choe and H

    K. Choe and H. Nam,Existence and uniqueness of topological multivortex solutions of the self-dual Chern–Simons CP(1) model, Nonlinear Anal.66(2007), no. 12, 2794–2813. 28 HUALI ZHANG AND JIE ZHOU

    2007

  3. [11]

    Chern and J

    S. Chern and J. Simons,Some cohomology classes in principal fiber bundles and their application to Riemannian geometry, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.68(1971), 791–794

    1971

  4. [12]

    W. Dai, D. Fang, and C. Wang,Long-time existence for semilinear wave equations with the inverse-square potential, J. Differential Equations309(2022), 98–141

    2022

  5. [13]

    Fang and C

    D. Fang and C. Wang,Local well-posedness and ill-posedness on the equation of type□u=u k(∂u)α, Chinese Ann. Math. Ser. B26(2005), no. 3, 361–378

    2005

  6. [14]

    Foschi and S

    D. Foschi and S. Klainerman,Bilinear space-time estimates for homogeneous wave equations, Ann. Sci. ´Ecole Norm. Sup. (4)33(2000), no. 2, 211–274

    2000

  7. [15]

    P. K. Ghosh and S. K. Ghosh,Topological and Nontopological Solitons in a GaugedO(3)Sigma Model with Chern-Simons term, Phys. Lett. B366(1996), no. 1-4, 199–204

    1996

  8. [16]

    Grigoryan and A

    V. Grigoryan and A. R. Nahmod,Almost critical well-posedness for nonlinear wave equations withQ µν null forms in 2D, Math. Res. Lett.21(2014), no. 2, 313–332

    2014

  9. [17]

    Huh and G

    H. Huh and G. Jin,Local and global solutions of Chern-Simons gaugedO(3)sigma equations in one space dimension, J. Math. Phys.57(2016), no. 8, 081511, 20 pp

    2016

  10. [18]

    Huh,Low regularity solutions of the Chern-Simons-Higgs equations, Nonlinearity18(2005), no

    H. Huh,Low regularity solutions of the Chern-Simons-Higgs equations, Nonlinearity18(2005), no. 6, 2581–2589

    2005

  11. [19]

    Huh,Local and global solutions of the Chern-Simons-Higgs system, J

    H. Huh,Local and global solutions of the Chern-Simons-Higgs system, J. Funct. Anal.242(2007), no. 2, 526–549

    2007

  12. [20]

    Huh,Cauchy problem for the fermion field equation coupled with the Chern–Simons gauge, Lett

    H. Huh,Cauchy problem for the fermion field equation coupled with the Chern–Simons gauge, Lett. Math. Phys.79(2007), no. 1, 75–94

    2007

  13. [21]

    Huh,Energy solution to the Chern-Simons-Schr¨ odinger equations, Abstr

    H. Huh,Energy solution to the Chern-Simons-Schr¨ odinger equations, Abstr. Appl. Anal.2013(2013), no. 1, p. 590653

    2013

  14. [22]

    Huh and S.-J

    H. Huh and S.-J. Oh,Low regularity solutions to the Chern-Simons-Dirac and the Chern-Simons-Higgs equations in the Lorenz gauge, Comm. Partial Differential Equations41(2016), no. 3, 375–397

    2016

  15. [23]

    Jin and H

    G. Jin and H. Zhang,Local well-posedness for Chern-Simons gaugedO(3)sigma equations under the Lorenz gauge, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.13871 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  16. [24]

    K. Kimm, K. Lee, and T. Lee,Anyonic Bogomol’nyi solitons in a gaugedO(3)σmodel, Phys. Rev. D53 (1996), no. 8, 4436–4440

    1996

  17. [25]

    Klainerman and M

    S. Klainerman and M. Machedon,Space-time estimates for null forms and the local existence theorem, Comm. Pure Appl. Math.46(1993), no. 9, 1221–1268

    1993

  18. [26]

    Klainerman and M

    S. Klainerman and M. Machedon,Smoothing estimates for null forms and applications, Duke Math. J.81 (1996), no. 1, 99-133

    1996

  19. [27]

    Klainerman,Long time behaviour of solutions to nonlinear wave equations, inProceedings of the Inter- national Congress of Mathematicians, Vol

    S. Klainerman,Long time behaviour of solutions to nonlinear wave equations, inProceedings of the Inter- national Congress of Mathematicians, Vol. 1, 2 (Warsaw, 1983), 1209–1215, PWN, Warsaw

    1983

  20. [28]

    Klainerman and S

    S. Klainerman and S. Selberg,Bilinear estimates and applications to nonlinear wave equations, Commun. Contemp. Math.4(2002), no. 2, 223–295

    2002

  21. [29]

    Keel and T

    M. Keel and T. Tao,Local and global well-posedness of wave maps onR 1+1 for rough data, Internat. Math. Res. Notices (1998), no. 21, 1117–1156

    1998

  22. [30]

    R. A. Leese,Low-energy scattering of solitons in theCP 1 model, Nuclear Phys. B344(1990), no. 1, 33–72

    1990

  23. [31]

    Z. M. Lim,Large data well-posedness in the energy space of the Chern-Simons-Schr¨ odinger system, J. Differential Equations264(2018), no. 4, 2553–2597

    2018

  24. [32]

    B. Liu, P. Smith, and D. Tataru,Local wellposedness of Chern–Simons–Schr¨ odinger, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN2014, no. 23, 6341–6398

  25. [33]

    Rodnianski and J

    I. Rodnianski and J. Sterbenz,On the formation of singularities in the criticalO(3)σ-model, Ann. of Math. (2)172(2010), no. 1, 187–242

    2010

  26. [34]

    B. J. Schroers,Bogomol’nyi solitons in a gaugedO(3)sigma model, Phys. Lett. B356(1995), no. 2–3, 291–296

    1995

  27. [35]

    Selberg,Multilinear space-time estimates and applications to local existence theory for nonlinear wave equations, Ph.D

    S. Selberg,Multilinear space-time estimates and applications to local existence theory for nonlinear wave equations, Ph.D. thesis, Princeton University, ProQuest LLC, Ann Arbor, MI, 1999

    1999

  28. [36]

    Selberg and A

    S. Selberg and A. Tesfahun,Global well-posedness of the Chern-Simons-Higgs equations with finite energy, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst.33(2012), 2531–2546. CHERN-SIMONS GAUGEDO(3) SIGMA EQUATIONS 29

    2012

  29. [37]

    Sterbenz and D

    J. Sterbenz and D. Tataru,Energy dispersed large data wave maps in2 + 1dimensions, Comm. Math. Phys.298(2010), no. 1, 139–230

    2010

  30. [38]

    Tataru,TheX s θ spaces and unique continuation for solutions to the semilinear wave equation, Comm

    D. Tataru,TheX s θ spaces and unique continuation for solutions to the semilinear wave equation, Comm. Partial Differential Equations21(1996), no. 5–6, 841–887

    1996

  31. [39]

    Tataru,Strichartz estimates in the hyperbolic space and global existence for the semilinear wave equation, Trans

    D. Tataru,Strichartz estimates in the hyperbolic space and global existence for the semilinear wave equation, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.353(2001), no. 2, 795–807

    2001

  32. [40]

    Tataru,Local and global results for wave maps

    D. Tataru,Local and global results for wave maps. I, Comm. Partial Differential Equations23(1998), no. 9–10, 1781–1793

    1998

  33. [41]

    Tataru,The wave maps equation, Bull

    D. Tataru,The wave maps equation, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.)41(2004), no. 2, 185–204

    2004

  34. [42]

    Wang and Y

    S. Wang and Y. Zhou,Physical space approach to wave equation bilinear estimates revisit, Ann. PDE10 (2024), no. 2, Paper No. 11, 14 pp

    2024

  35. [43]

    Yang,The existence of solitons in gauged sigma models with broken symmetry: some remarks, Lett

    Y. Yang,The existence of solitons in gauged sigma models with broken symmetry: some remarks, Lett. Math. Phys.40(1997), no. 2, 177–189

    1997

  36. [44]

    Zhang,Local well-posedness for incompressible neo-Hookean elastic equations in almost critical Sobolev spaces, Calc

    H. Zhang,Local well-posedness for incompressible neo-Hookean elastic equations in almost critical Sobolev spaces, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations63(2024), no. 3, Paper No. 66, 20 pp

    2024

  37. [45]

    Zhou,Local existence with minimal regularity for nonlinear wave equations, Amer

    Y. Zhou,Local existence with minimal regularity for nonlinear wave equations, Amer. J. Math.119(1997), no. 3, 671–703

    1997

  38. [46]

    Zhou,(1+2)-dimensional radially symmetric wave maps revisit, Chinese Ann

    Y. Zhou,(1+2)-dimensional radially symmetric wave maps revisit, Chinese Ann. Math. Ser. B43(2022), no. 5, 785–796

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.