Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 57 references

Loss-driven miniaturized bound state in continuum biosensing system

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A Q-switched sensing mechanism makes refractive-index changes appear as large peak-intensity jumps in a 3D bound-state-in-continuum metasurface, achieving 928 %/RIU sensitivity and 129 aM exosome detection.

desk verdict Strong experimental BIC biosensor with wafer-scale fabrication, but the Q-switched theory needs the supplementary and the clinical DNN is overfitted. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.18110 v1 pith:D5H2TG6B submitted 2024-11-27 physics.optics

Jiacheng Sun , Fajun Li , Xudong Wang , Jing He , Dangwu Ni , Lang Wang , Shaowei Lin , Qiu Min
show 2 more authors
Jinfeng Zhu Liaoyong Wen
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics
keywords Q-switchedsensingboundstatesinthecontinuummetasurfacebiosensorstrongcouplingcriticalextracellularvesicleslungcancerdiagnosisnanoimprintfabrication
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes a biosensing mechanism it calls Q-switched sensing, aimed at breaking the usual trade-off in high-Q resonance sensors between spectral sharpness and practical compactness. The idea is to use two strongly coupled optical modes so that a change in the real refractive index from analyte binding shifts the detuning between the modes, and through that detuning alters the damping loss of the quasi-BIC mode. The consequence is a large change in resonance peak intensity, rather than a wavelength shift, so the readout works with broadband light sources and simple intensity detection. The authors realize this in a wafer-scale 3D bound-state-in-continuum metasurface and report a bulk sensitivity of 928 %/RIU, a refractive-index limit of detection of $10^{-5}$, and 129 aM detection of lung-cancer-derived exosomes in a miniaturized LED-driven system.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the strongly-coupled two-oscillator model (Eq. 1), the Rabi-splitting relation $\Omega_R = 2\sqrt{g^2 - (\gamma_1-\gamma_2)^2/4}$ (Eq. 2), and the Q-switched equation (Eq. 3) linking the radiative Q factor to refractive index change; these are combined with the one-port critical-coupling absorption expression (Eq. 4), $Abs = \frac{2Q_rQ_n}{(\omega-\omega_r)^2 + (Q_r+Q_n)^2}$. The physical realization is a 3D spatially asymmetric (out-of-plane) BIC metasurface whose upper and lower branch modes satisfy the required sensitivity asymmetry, allowing detuning from the ambient index to control radiative damping without geometry-induced mode crosstalk.

What would settle it

Directly measure the complex eigenfrequencies of the two coupled modes in a fluidic cell as the superstrate refractive index is stepped across the claimed working range; if the radiative Q factor does not cross the nonradiative Q factor, or if the fraction of peak-intensity change attributable to the Q-switch is not substantially larger than the ordinary wavelength-shift response of the same device, the central mechanism is refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that in a two-oscillator strong-coupling system of the form $H = \begin{pmatrix} \omega_1+i\gamma_1 & g \\ g & \omega_2+i\gamma_2 \end{pmatrix}$, a refractive-index-induced detuning ($\Delta\omega$) can be converted into a change in the oscillator damping ($\Delta\gamma$) rather than a change in resonance frequency, provided the two modes have strongly asymmetric sensitivities to the index change. The radiative Q factor $Q_r$ then switches across the nonradiative $Q_n$ as the analyte concentration varies, and because absorption is maximized at critical coupling $Q_r=Q_n$, the peak intensity $\Delta I$ responds sharply to small index changes. The paper derives a Q-switched equation for $Q_r$ as a function of $\Delta n$, verifies it analytically, numerically, and experimentally in a 3D-BIC metasurface, and demonstrates that this mechanism turns high Q factor into an asset: larger $Q_r$ gives larger peak-intensity sensitivity, opposite to conventional wavelength-shift sensors, and makes the sensor compatible with broadband illumination and a miniature LED readout.

Load-bearing premise

The central premise is that the two strongly coupled modes respond to an ambient refractive-index change with the required asymmetry ($\Delta\omega_1 \gg \Delta\omega_2$ and $\Delta\gamma_1 \ll \Delta\gamma_2$), so that detuning is converted almost entirely into a damping change; if this asymmetry is weaker than assumed, the peak-intensity boost collapses toward the ordinary wavelength-shift sensing regime.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • High-Q resonances no longer force a trade-off with wavelength sensitivity: increasing $Q_r$ improves peak-intensity sensitivity, so fabrication precision and light confinement become assets rather than liabilities.
  • Spectrometer-free, broadband-light-source imaging becomes practical for high-Q sensors; the authors demonstrate reconstruction of 3.5 nm vertical features from 10--25 nm bandwidth illumination.
  • Wafer-scale production by aluminum 3D nanoimprinting makes the BIC metasurface chip manufacturable at 8-inch scale, lowering the cost barrier for BIC biosensors.
  • The same Q-switched principle should extend to other coupled-resonator systems, including non-Hermitian exceptional-point sensors, where asymmetric mode responses to perturbations exist.
  • A DNN-assisted analysis of intensity spectra raises lung-cancer classification accuracy from 85% to 100% in this cohort, suggesting that intensity-readout metasurfaces can feed robust clinical diagnostics.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the Q-switch mechanism is as general as the model suggests, the phase diagram's empty second quadrant (imaginary refractive index driving a real frequency response) is a natural place to look for complementary sensing mechanisms, possibly nonlinear or gain-based analogues.
  • The key performance metric shift from wavelength shift to intensity change implies that environmental noise in illumination intensity, rather than spectral resolution, becomes the limiting factor; quantifying this noise budget would sharpen the practical detection limit.
  • The claimed LOD of 129 aM for extracellular vesicles depends on the biofunctionalization and DNN analysis as much as on the metasurface; a fair comparison with state-of-the-art would require a blinded multi-site study on the same clinical specimens.
  • One can test the mechanism's universality by applying the same two-oscillator asymmetry design to all-dielectric metasurfaces, which lack plasmonic metal loss and might push the Q-switch response even further.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a 'Q-switched' sensing mechanism in which an analyte-induced change in the real part of the refractive index detunes two strongly coupled modes, converting that detuning into a change in radiative damping and hence a large peak-intensity response. The mechanism is implemented in a three-dimensional bound-state-in-continuum (BIC) metasurface fabricated by wafer-scale aluminum nanoimprinting. The authors report a peak-intensity sensitivity of 928 %/RIU, an LED-driven miniaturized system with a bulk refractive-index LOD of 5.1e-5 RIU, an exosome LOD of 129 aM, and DNN-assisted lung cancer classification with nearly 100% accuracy on 40 clinical serum samples. The central theoretical result is the refractometric Q-switched equation, Eq. (3), which connects detuning to Q_r.

Significance. If the Q-switched mechanism were rigorously established, the work would be significant: it addresses a real bottleneck in high-Q refractometric biosensing, namely the conflict between narrow resonances and broadband/compact illumination, and it demonstrates an impressive fabrication route for large-area 3D metasurfaces. The experimental demonstrations of broadband-light compatibility, wafer-scale fabrication, and clinical pilot testing are valuable. However, the manuscript's central theoretical claim rests on an equation whose printed form is problematic and whose derivation is deferred to an unavailable supplement, so the significance of the mechanism is not yet established. The clinical accuracy claim is also based on a small, cross-validated-only dataset.

major comments (4)
  1. [Theoretical model, Eq. (3)] Equation (3) as printed is not a valid expression for a radiative quality factor: the denominator contains the imaginary term -i(omega1-omega2), which would make Q_r complex unless unstated cancellations occur, and no such cancellation is shown in the main text. The derivation is deferred to 'Method and Fig. S1-3' and to 'Supplementary equation E18', but the supplementary material was not available for review, so the central link between detuning and radiative-loss switching is currently unverified. In addition, the design condition Delta-omega1 >> Delta-omega2 and Delta-gamma1 << Delta-gamma2 is asserted in the Design and fabrication section rather than derived from the 2x2 Hamiltonian in Eq. (1); the authors should show that a concrete two-mode system satisfies these inequalities and that Eq. (3) follows from Eq. (1).
  2. [Theoretical model, Eq. (4)] The one-port absorption formula Abs = 2 Q_r Q_n / ((omega-omega_r)^2 + (Q_r+Q_n)^2) is dimensionally inconsistent: the denominator adds a frequency-squared term to a dimensionless term. Unless (omega-omega_r) is implicitly normalized by the linewidth, which is not stated, the predicted peak-intensity response in Fig. 1m and the critical-coupling condition Q_r=Q_n are not quantitatively meaningful. Please give the correct normalized expression and re-derive the theoretical sensitivity that leads to the claimed >10^3 %/RIU value.
  3. [Theoretical model and Design/fabrication] The analytic curves in Figs. 1l and 1m rely on S1 and S2, the frequency sensitivities of the two oscillators, yet these are precisely the quantities that a predictive theory of the mechanism should explain; if S1, S2, and the initial radiative damping gamma_r0 are fitted to the simulated or measured response, the later agreement is not an independent validation of the Q-switched mechanism. The same issue applies to the 1.2x Im(n_Au) adjustment introduced in the simulations in the Design and fabrication section to imitate fabrication losses. Please state explicitly which parameters are fitted, which are derived from first principles, and provide uncertainty estimates for the extracted Q_r and intensity changes.
  4. [Clinical lung cancer diagnosis with DNN assistance] The claim of nearly 100% prediction accuracy is based on 40 serum samples (25 lung cancer patients, 15 healthy controls) analyzed with 4-fold cross-validation and no independent test set (Figs. 4f-4j). The procedure also defines a 50 +/- 20% suspected-case window and then reports accuracy on the remaining cases, which can inflate apparent performance. Please report confidence intervals, the full cross-validation protocol including any hyperparameter selection, and ideally an external validation cohort; otherwise the statement 'prediction accuracy improved dramatically from 85% to 100%' should be substantially tempered.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] The text contains several typographical and language errors, including 'frequncies' in the theoretical model, 'perturbate' in the abstract, 'partibility' in the introduction, and '10E-5' instead of 10^-5. These should be corrected.
  2. [Figure 3 caption] The Fig. 3 caption lists two panels labeled 'k' (one for reconstructed height and one for dynamic curves), and the ordering of panels k-m in the caption does not match the references in the main text; please renumber the panels consistently.
  3. [Figure 4 caption] The caption lists panels 'm,n' as confusion matrices, whereas the text refers to 'Figs. 4j and k' for the confusion matrices; the panel labels and in-text references need to be aligned.
  4. [Data and materials availability] The central derivation (Supplementary Eq. E18), the comparison Table S1, and other supporting details are only in the supplementary material, which was not available for review; at a minimum, the main text should be self-contained for Eq. (3) and Eq. (4), or the supplementary should be provided with the revision.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No reduction-to-inputs found; the central Q-switched relation is an analytic hypothesis and the headline sensitivities are experimental extractions, not forced predictions.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain starts from the standard 2x2 coupled-oscillator Hamiltonian (Eq. 1), obtains the Rabi splitting (Eq. 2), and then presents Eq. (3) as the Q-switched refractometric equation. Although Eq. (3) is parameterized by the mode frequency sensitivities S1 and S2, those are physical inputs (the per-oscillator response to refractive index), not the quantity being predicted; the claimed output is the change in damping and hence Qr. The printed form of Eq. (3) is problematic because it contains an explicit '-i(omega1-omega2)' term that would make Qr complex, and the corrected version is relegated to an unavailable Method/Supplementary Eq. E18. That is a serious omitted-proof and correctness risk, but it is not circularity: no equation in the visible text is shown to reduce to its own inputs by construction. The headline numbers—928 %/RIU, LOD 5.1e-5 RIU, 129 aM exosomes, and the DNN accuracy—are described as experimental extractions and fitted calibration results, not as predictions of Eq. (3), so they cannot be circular in the sense of a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The disclosed 1.2-fold adjustment of Im(nAu) is a simulation-calibration parameter used to imitate fabrication loss; it affects linewidth matching but is not presented as a first-principles prediction. The self-citations (refs. 35-37, 46) support the AAO template and prior BIC structures, but the Q-switched sensing claim is supported by in-paper simulations and experiments, so no load-bearing argument reduces to a self-citation chain. Overall, no specific circular step meets the required evidentiary standard; the score reflects only the minor, non-load-bearing presence of self-citations and the disclosed loss calibration, while the omitted Eq. (3) derivation is noted as a correctness concern rather than a circularity finding.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a parameterized coupled-oscillator model with several free parameters (sensitivities, damping rates, coupling, material loss fudge factor) and a key premise that detuning is converted into damping change. No machine-checked proofs or shipped code.

free parameters (6)
  • S1, S2: frequency sensitivities of the two coupled modes = Extracted from simulation/experiment
    Appear in Eq. (3) as inputs that set the detuning Δω = Δn(S1-S2); they are not derived from first principles.
  • γ2′: original damping rate of oscillator 2 = Not specified
    Initial damping at zero detuning, used in Eq. (3).
  • γn: intrinsic material damping = Not specified
    Material property parameter in Eq. (3).
  • Coupling strength g = Inferred from Rabi splitting
    Chosen to match measured splitting.
  • 1.2x Im(nAu) scaling = 1.2
    Ad hoc adjustment of Au refractive index imaginary part to imitate fabrication loss in simulations.
  • Initial radiative damping γr0 = Not specified
    Used to constrain the BIC-enhanced Qr in the model.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Two-oscillator strong-coupling Hamiltonian (Eq. 1)
    Used to define Rabi splitting and mode hybridization.
  • standard math One-port absorption model (Eq. 4)
    Relates Qr and Qn to peak absorption; critical coupling at Qr=Qn.
  • ad hoc to paper Δn-induced detuning is compensated by damping changes (Δγ)
    The central premise of Q-switching; no derivation in the main text, and Eq. (3) is not self-evident.
  • domain assumption The two modes have markedly different responses (Δω1 >> Δω2, Δγ1 << Δγ2)
    Required for the Q-switch effect; asserted as a design condition, supported by mode profiles in Fig.1n,o but not proven.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Loss-driven miniaturized bound state in continuum biosensing system." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/D5H2TG6B

@misc{pith2026241118110,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Loss-driven miniaturized bound state in continuum biosensing system},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/D5H2TG6B}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.18110}
}
read the original abstract

Optical metasurface has brought a revolution in label-free molecular sensing, attracting extensive attention. Currently, such sensing approaches are being designed to respond to peak wavelengths with a higher Q factor in the visible and near-infrared regions.Nevertheless, a higher Q factor that enhances light confinement will inevitably deteriorate the wavelength sensitivity and complicate the sensing system. We propose a Q-switched sensing mechanism, which enables the real part of the refractive index to effectively perturbate the damping loss of the oscillator, resulting in a boost of peak intensity.Consequently, a higher Q factor in Q-switched sensor can further enhance the peak sensitivity while remaining compatible with broadband light sources, simultaneously meeting the requirements of high performance and a compact system.This is achieved in a unique 3D bound-state-in-continuum (BIC) metasurface which can be mass-produced by wafer-scale aluminum-nanoimprinting technology and provides a peak intensity sensitivity up to 928 %/RIU.Therefore, a miniaturized BIC biosensing system is realized, with a limit of detection to 10E-5 refractive index units and 129 aM extracellular vesicles in clinical lung cancer diagnosis, both of which are magnitudes lower than those of current state-of-the-art biosensors. It further demonstrates significant potential for home cancer self-testing equipment for post-operative follow-up. This Q-switched sensing mechanism offers a new perspective for the commercialization of advanced and practical BIC optical biosensing systems in real-setting scenarios.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.18110 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic of Q-switched sensing mechanism and fully-integrated biosensing system enabled by 3D-BIC metasurface. a Phase diagram of different photonic biosensing mechanisms: refractometric affinity biosensing at 1st quadrant, surface-enhanced spectroscopy biosensing at 3rd , Q￾switched sensing proposed in this work at 4th quadrant and the sensing mechanism at 2nd quadrant is remained to be explored. b-d Schematic vie… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Structure parameter optimization of 3D-BIC metasurface in strong coupling system. a,b Simulation comparison between introducing in-plane asymmetry and out-of-plane asymmetry for manipulating qBIC resonances in strong coupling system. It can be observed that conventional in￾plane asymmetry will causing mode-crosstalk between multiple resonances, while the out-of-plane 3D-BIC configuration can perfectly avoid such cro… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Bulk sensing performance of Q-switched sensor and its hyperspectral image characterization for surface sensing. a Simulated Q-switched bulk sensing performance with ΔRe(n), which shows significantly growing of peak intensity of upper branch with small frequency detuning. b Experimental achieved Q-switched bulk sensing at visible (VIS), near-infrared (NIR) and short-wave infrared (SWIR) with the increase of glycerin … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Q-switched sensor applied in clinical lung cancer diagnosis with AI assistance. a Schematic of clinical lung cancer diagnosis utilizing 3D-BIC metasurface. b Q-switched peak intensity response during bio-functional steps. The inset shows representative TEM images of pu…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A. M. Shrivastav, U. Cvelbar, & I. Abdulhalim . A comprehensive review on plasmonic -based biosensors used in viral diagnostics. Commun. Biol. 4, 70 (2021)

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    S. Sun, L. Wu, Z. Geng, P. P. Shum, X. Ma & J. Wang. Refractometric Imaging and Biodetection Empowered by Nanophotonics. Laser Photonics Rev. 17, 2200814 (2023)

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Abdulhalim, M

    I. Abdulhalim, M. Zourob & A. Lakhtakia. Surface plasmon resonance for biosensing: A mini - review. Electromagnetics 28, 214–242 (2008)

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    Altug, S

    H. Altug, S. H. Oh, S. A. Maier, et al. Advances and applications of nanophotonic biosensors. Nat. Nanotechnol. 17, 5–16 (2022)

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    F. Li, J. Huang, C. Guan, et al. Affinity exploration of SARS -CoV-2 RBD variants to mAb - functionalized plasmonic metasurfaces for label-free immunoassay boosting. ACS Nano 17, 3383– 3393 (2023)

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Zhou, et al

    H. Zhou, et al. Surface plasmons -phonons for mid-infrared hyperspectral imaging. Sci. Adv. 10, eado3179 (2024)

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Rodrigo, et al

    D. Rodrigo, et al. Mid-infrared plasmonic biosensing with graphene. Science 349, 165–168 (2015)

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    R. M. Kim, J. H. Huh, S. Yoo, et al. Enantiosel ective sensing by collective circular dichroism. Nature 612, 470–476 (2022)

    work page 2022

Show all 57 references
  1. [9]

    Y. Shen, J. Zhou, T. Liu, et al. Plasmonic gold mushroom arrays with refractive index sensing figures of merit approaching the theoretical limit. Nat. Commun. 4, 2381 (2013)

    2013

  2. [10]

    Moreau, C

    A. Moreau, C. Ciracì , J. Mock, et al. Controlled-reflectance surfaces with film-coupled colloidal nanoantennas. Nature 492, 86–89 (2012)

    2012

  3. [11]

    Zhang, et al

    C. Zhang, et al. Switching plasmonic nanogaps between classical and quantum regimes with supramolecular interactions. Sci. Adv. 8, eabj9752 (2022)

    2022

  4. [12]

    Xomalis, X

    A. Xomalis, X. Zheng, R. Chikkaraddy, et al. Detecting mid-infrared light by molecular frequency upconversion in dual-wavelength nanoantennas. Science 374,1268-1271 (2021)

    2021

  5. [13]

    Limonov, M

    M. Limonov, M. Rybin, A. Poddubny, et al. Fano resonances in photonics. Nat. Photon. 11, 543– 554 (2017)

    2017

  6. [14]

    N. Li, T. D. Canady, Q. Huang, et al. Photonic resonator interferometric scattering microscopy. Nat. Commun. 12, 1744 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    Leitis, et al

    A. Leitis, et al. Angle-multiplexed all-dielectric metasurfaces for broadband molecular fingerprint retrieval. Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw2871 (2019)

    2019

  8. [16]

    Tittl, et al

    A. Tittl, et al. Imaging-based molecular barcoding with pixelated dielectric metasurfaces. Science 360, 1105–1109 (2018)

    2018

  9. [17]

    Aigner, et al

    A. Aigner, et al. Plasmonic bound states in the continuum to tailor light-matter coupling. Sci. Adv. 8, eadd4816 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    J. Hu, F. Safir, K. Chang, et al. Rapid genetic screening with high quality factor metasurfaces. Nat. Commun. 14, 4486 (2023)

    2023

  11. [19]

    Kü hner, L

    L. Kü hner, L. Sortino, R. Berté, et al. Radial bound states in the continuum for polarization - invariant nanophotonics. Nat. Commun. 13, 4992 (2022)

    2022

  12. [20]

    Watanabe & M

    K. Watanabe & M. Iwanaga, Nanogap enhancement of the refractometric sensitivity at quasi - bound states in the continuum in all-dielectric metasurfaces. Nanophotonics 12, 99–109 (2023)

    2023

  13. [21]

    Liang, K

    Y. Liang, K. Koshelev, F. Zhang, H. Lin, S. Lin, J. Wu, B. Jia, and Y. Kivshar. Bound States in the Continuum in Anisotropic Plasmonic Metasurfaces. Nano Lett. 9, 6351–6356 (2022)

    2022

  14. [22]

    D. C. Marinica, A. G. Borisov & S. V. Shabanov. Bound states in the continuum in photonics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 183902 (2008)

    2008

  15. [23]

    Koshelev, S

    K. Koshelev, S. Lepeshov, M. Liu, A. Bogdanov & Y. Kivshar. Asymmetric metasurfaces with high-Q resonances governed by bound states in the continuum. Phys. R ev. Lett. 121, 193903 (2018)

    2018

  16. [24]

    Santiago-Cruz, et al

    T. Santiago-Cruz, et al. Resonant metasurfaces for generating complex quantum states. Science 377, 991–995 (2022)

    2022

  17. [25]

    Jahani, E

    Y. Jahani, E. R. Arvelo, F. Yesilkoy et al. Imaging-based spectrometer-less optofluidic biosensors based on die lectric metasurfaces for detecting extracellular vesicles. Nat. Commun. 12, 3246 (2021)

    2021

  18. [26]

    Yesilkoy, E

    F. Yesilkoy, E. R. Arvelo, Y. Jahani, et al. Ultrasensitive hyperspectral imaging and biodetection enabled by dielectric metasurfaces. Nat. Photonics 13, 390–396 (2019)

    2019

  19. [27]

    Ansaryan, Y

    S. Ansaryan, Y. C. Liu, X. Li, et al. High -throughput spatiotemporal monitoring of single -cell secretions via plasmonic microwell arrays. Nat. Biomed. Eng 7, 943–958 (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    Balaur, S

    E. Balaur, S. O’ Toole, A. J. Spurling, et al. Colorimetric histology using plasmonically act ive microscope slides. Nature 598, 65–71 (2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    Kü hne, J

    J. Kü hne, J. Wang, T. Weber, et al. Fabrication robustness in BIC metasurfaces. Nanophotonics 10, 4305–4312 (2021)

    2021

  22. [30]

    Dmitriy, R

    D. Dmitriy, R. Sergey, R. Yury & N. Igor. Light–matter interaction in the strong coupling regime: configurations, conditions, and applications. Nanoscale 10, 3589 (2018)

    2018

  23. [31]

    W. K. Kim, J. Tang, P. H. Kuo & S. F. Kuo. Implementation and phase detection of dielectric - grating-coupled surface plasmon resonance sensor for backside incident light. Opt. Express 27, 3867–3872 (2019)

    2019

  24. [32]

    C. F. Doiron, I. Brener & A. Cerjan. Realizing symmetry -guaranteed pairs of bound states in the continuum in metasurfaces. Nat. Commun. 13, 7534 (2022)

    2022

  25. [33]

    W. Wang, Y. K. Srivastava, T. C. Tan, et al. Brillouin zone folding driven bound states in the continuum. Nat. Commun. 14, 2811 (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    M., Cotrufo, A., Cordaro, D. L. Sounas, et al. Passive bias-free non-reciprocal metasurfaces based on thermally nonlinear quasi-bound states in the continuum. Nat. Photon. 18, 81–90 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    L. Wen, R. Xu, Y. Mi, et al. Multiple nanostructures based on anodized aluminium oxide templates. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 244–250 (2017)

    2017

  28. [36]

    Z. Wang, J. Sun, J. Li, et al. Customizing 2.5D ou t-of-plane architectures for robust plasmonic bound-states-in-the-continuum metasurfaces. Adv. Sci. 10, 2206236 (2023)

    2023

  29. [37]

    X. Sun, J. Sun, Z. Wang, et al. Manipulating dual bound states in the continuum for efficient spatial light modulator. Nano Lett. 22, 9982–9989 (2022)

    2022

  30. [38]

    Weber, L

    T. Weber, L. Kü hner, L. Sortino et al. Intrinsic strong light-matter coupling with self-hybridized bound states in the continuum in van der Waals metasurfaces. Nat. Mater. 22, 970–976 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    C. Yang, W. Chen, X. Kong, D. Wang, J. Chen & C. W. Qiu. Can weak chirality induce strong coupling between resonant states? Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 146102 (2022)

    2022

  32. [40]

    S. I. Azzam, V. M. Shalaev, A. Boltasseva & A. V. Kildishev. Formation of bound states in the continuum in hybrid plasmonic-photonic systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 253901 (2018)

    2018

  33. [41]

    Dolia, H

    V . Dolia, H. B. Balch, S. Dagli, et al. Very-large-scale-integrated high-quality factor nanoantenna pixels. Nat. Nanotechnol. 1748-3395 (2024)

    2024

  34. [42]

    Chen, W., Kaya Özdemir, Ş., Zhao, G. et al. Exceptional points enhance sensi ng in an optical microcavity. Nature 548, 192–196 (2017)

    2017

  35. [43]

    Exceptional –point–enhanced phase sensing

    Wenbo, M., Zhoutian, F., Fu, L., and Lan, Y . Exceptional –point–enhanced phase sensing. Sci. Adv.10, eadl5037 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    A Fully Integrated Miniaturized Optical Biosensor for Fast and Multiplexing Plasmonic Detection of High - and Low-Molecular- Weight Analytes

    Bolognesi, M., Prosa, M., Toerker, M., Lopez Sanchez, L., et al. A Fully Integrated Miniaturized Optical Biosensor for Fast and Multiplexing Plasmonic Detection of High - and Low-Molecular- Weight Analytes. Adv. Mater. 35, 2208719 (2023)

    2023

  37. [45]

    Myriam, S

    O. Myriam, S. Esther et al. Point -of-care detection of extracellular vesicles: Sensitivity optimization and multiple-target detection. Biosensors and Bioelectronics. 87, 38-45 (2017)

    2017

  38. [46]

    Liang, X

    H. Liang, X. Wang, F. Li, et al. Label-free plasmonic metasensing of PSA and exosomes in serum for rapid high-sensitivity diagnosis of early prostate cancer. Biosensors and Bioelectronics. 235, 0956-5663 (2023)

    2023

  39. [47]

    L. Xu, R. Chopdat, et al. Development of a simple, sensitive and selective colorimetric aptasensor for the detection of cancer-derived exosomes. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 169, 112576 (2020)

    2020

  40. [48]

    Z. Wang, S. Zong, Y . Wang, et al. Screening and multiple detection of cancer exosomes using SERS-based method. Nanoscale 10, 9053 (2018)

    2018

  41. [49]

    J. Chen, Y . Xu, Y . Lu and W. Xing. Isolation and visible detection of tumor-derived exosomes from plasma. Analytical Chemistry 90, 14207-14215 (2018)

    2018

  42. [50]

    D. Jin, F. Yang, Y . Zhang, et al. ExoAPP: Exosome-oriented, aptamer nanoprobe-enabled surface proteins profiling and detection. Analytical Chemistry 90, 14402−14411 (2018)

    2018

  43. [51]

    Zhang, X

    P. Zhang, X. Zhou, M. H e, et al. Ultrasensitive detection of circulating exosomes with a 3D - nanopatterned microfluidic chip. Nat Biomed Eng 3, 438–451 (2019)

    2019

  44. [52]

    Huang, L

    R. Huang, L. He, Y . Xia, et al. A Sensitive aptasensor based on a hemin/G -quadruplex assisted signal amplification strategy for electrochemical detection of gastric cancer exosomes. Small 15, 1900735 (2019)

    2019

  45. [53]

    Xiong , Z

    H. Xiong , Z. Huang, Q. Lin, et al. Surface plasmon coupling electrochemiluminescence immunosensor based on polymer dots and AuNPs for ultrasensitive detection of pancreatic cancer exosomes. Analytical Chemistry 94, 837-846 (2022)

    2022

  46. [54]

    Rongsheng, L

    H. Rongsheng, L. Shaowei, L. Faju n, et al. Exploring aptamer -based metasurfaces for label -free plasmonic biosensing of breast tumor-derived exosomes. Adv. Opt. Mat. 2401180 (2024)

    2024

  47. [55]

    J. Park, J. S. Park, C. H. Huang, et al. An integrated magneto-electrochemical device for the rapid profiling of tumour extracellular vesicles from blood plasma. Nat Biomed Eng 5, 678–689 (2021)

    2021

  48. [56]

    C. Liu, J. Zhao, F. Tian, et al. Low -cost thermophoretic profiling of extracellular-vesicle surface proteins for the early detection and classification of cancers. Nat Biomed Eng 3, 183–193 (2019)

    2019

  49. [57]

    Wu et al

    X. Wu et al. Exosome -templated nanoplasmonics for multipar ametric molecular profiling. Sci. Adv. 6, eaba2556 (2020). Acknowledgments: The authors thank the facility support and technical assistance from the Westlake Centre for Micro/Nano Fabrication, the Instrumentation and ...

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.