The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2606.17347 · v1 · pith:D5RUDYNW · submitted 2026-06-15 · eess.SY · cs.SY

Classifying Transient Regimes in Dynamic Systems through Properties of Spatial Curves and Stochastic Processes: A Data-Driven Approach

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel 2026-06-27 02:01 UTCgrok-4.3pith:D5RUDYNWrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification eess.SY cs.SY
keywords regime classificationtransient regimesspatial curvesarc lengthdynamic systemsstochastic processesstability theorymultivariate systems
0
0 comments X

The pith

A spatial curve from sample moments classifies transient regimes in multivariate dynamic systems using its arc length.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a representation of dynamic systems as spatial curves constructed from sample mathematical moments. It then links geometrical properties of these curves to stability theory and stationary stochastic processes to create two classifiers, one based on arc length and one on curvatures. These classifiers identify behaviors including multivariate asymptotic stability, marginal stability, and cyclostationarity. The arc length version is shown to outperform existing techniques on simulated linear, nonlinear, and discontinuous systems while avoiding the need for multiple parameters. This targets limitations in current sensor-based regime classification methods for complex multivariate cases that may include periodic signals.

Core claim

Connecting sample mathematical moments into a spatial curve and applying stability theory along with properties of stationary stochastic processes allows arc-length and curvature classifiers to describe and detect transient regimes such as asymptotic stability, marginal stability, and cyclostationarity in multivariate systems.

What carries the argument

The spatial curve representation of the system based on its sample mathematical moments, where arc length serves as the main distinguishing feature for regime classification.

If this is right

  • The classifiers apply to linear, nonlinear, and discontinuous multivariate systems under the studied conditions.
  • No additional parameters or post-hoc tuning are required for the proposed classifiers.
  • The method handles systems containing periodic signals where other sensor-based solutions may fail.
  • The arc length classifier uses fewer computation resources than some existing alternatives while achieving better classification performance.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The geometric representation could be tested on experimental rather than only simulated data to check real-world robustness.
  • Curvature-based classification might be combined with the arc length version for hybrid detection in systems with mixed behaviors.
  • This moment-curve approach might connect to other time-series geometry methods for regime detection in control applications.

Load-bearing premise

That a spatial curve built from sample mathematical moments, combined with stability theory and properties of stationary stochastic processes, is sufficient to distinguish transient behaviors such as asymptotic stability, marginal stability, and cyclostationarity without additional parameters or post-hoc tuning.

What would settle it

Apply both the arc length classifier and a competing method to a new simulated multivariate cyclostationary system; if the arc length method consistently misclassifies the regime while the competitor succeeds, the outperformance claim is falsified.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.17347 by Carlos Ocampo-Martinez, Carlos Puerto-Santana, Cristian Puerto-Santana, Javier Diaz-Rozo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Scheme of the proposed methodology for transient regimes and stationary regime classification. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Results of the simulated linear dynamic system. (a) Input and output signals of the simulated linear dynamical system. (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Results of the simulated non-linear dynamic system. (a) Input and output signals of the simulated non-linear dynamical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Results of the simulated discontinuous dynamic system. (a) Input signals of the simulated discontinuous dynamical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This article proposes a novel methodology for the classification of transient and stationary regimes in dynamic systems. Several sensor-based solutions for regime classification in the literature require the setting of several parameters, or are not suitable for scenarios involving multivariate systems that may contain periodic signals. The proposed method introduces a spatial curve representation of the considered system based on its sample mathematical moments. Then, by connecting concepts of stability theory, geometrical properties of spatial curves and stationary stochastic processes, two regime classifiers are designed using the arc length and the curvatures of the proposed curve. Both classifiers are capable of describing and detecting transient regimes, considering behaviors such as: multivariate asymptotically, marginally stability, and cyclostationarity. Furthermore, a quantitative comparison in performance and computation resources of the proposed classifiers against existing classifiers in the literature illustrates that the proposed regime classifier based on the arc length outperforms other techniques in classifying transient regimes for simulated linear, non-linear, and discontinuous multivariate systems under the specified studied conditions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a data-driven methodology for classifying transient and stationary regimes in dynamic systems. It constructs a spatial curve representation based on sample mathematical moments of the system outputs, then applies concepts from stability theory, geometrical properties of spatial curves, and stationary stochastic processes to design two classifiers: one based on arc length and one based on curvature. Both are intended to detect behaviors including multivariate asymptotic stability, marginal stability, and cyclostationarity. A quantitative comparison on simulated linear, nonlinear, and discontinuous multivariate systems claims that the arc-length classifier outperforms existing techniques under the specified studied conditions, while also comparing computational resources.

Significance. If the central claims hold with supporting derivations and validation, the work would offer a parameter-free classifier grounded in stability theory and stochastic process properties, addressing limitations of sensor-based methods that require parameter tuning or struggle with multivariate periodic signals. The geometric framing via moments-based curves is a distinctive contribution that could enable new tools for regime detection in control applications, provided the simulations demonstrate generalizability beyond the studied cases.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the performance claim is scoped to 'specified studied conditions' without enumerating the system dimensions, noise levels, sampling rates, or exact comparison baselines; this should be expanded for reproducibility even in the abstract.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract states the method is suitable for scenarios involving periodic signals, but does not indicate how cyclostationarity is quantitatively distinguished from marginal stability in the curve properties; a brief clarification would strengthen the claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the accurate summary of our manuscript and for acknowledging the potential significance of a parameter-free, geometrically grounded classifier for transient regimes. The recommendation of 'uncertain' appears to stem from the absence of listed major comments; we therefore provide no point-by-point responses below and stand ready to address any specific concerns the referee may wish to raise in a subsequent round.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained

full rationale

The paper defines a spatial curve from sample mathematical moments, then applies arc length and curvature classifiers grounded in stability theory and stationary stochastic process properties. These steps are presented as direct constructions from the data and external mathematical concepts, with performance evaluated on simulated systems under explicitly stated conditions. No equation or claim reduces by construction to a fitted input renamed as prediction, no self-citation chain is load-bearing for the central result, and no ansatz or uniqueness theorem is smuggled in. The method is scoped without hidden tuning or self-referential definitions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Abstract-only review; the central claim rests on the unverified assumption that moment-derived spatial curves plus geometric and stochastic concepts suffice for regime detection. No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be audited in detail.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Stability theory, geometrical properties of spatial curves, and stationary stochastic processes can be connected to design regime classifiers
    Invoked in the abstract to justify the two classifiers.
invented entities (1)
  • spatial curve representation based on sample mathematical moments no independent evidence
    purpose: To encode system behavior for arc-length and curvature-based regime classification
    New representation introduced as the foundation of the method; no independent evidence supplied in abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5714 in / 1275 out tokens · 38400 ms · 2026-06-27T02:01:55.538471+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    L. Ljung. Perspectives on system identification.Annual Reviews in Control, 34(1):1–12, 2010

  2. [2]

    H ¨agg, J

    P. H ¨agg, J. Schoukens, M. Gevers, and H. Hjalmars- son. The transient impulse response modeling method for non-parametric system identification.Automatica, 68:314–328, 2016

  3. [3]

    Lataire and T

    J. Lataire and T. Chen. Transfer function and transient es- timation by Gaussian process regression in the frequency domain.Automatica, 72:217–229, 2016

  4. [4]

    Qin and T.A

    S.J. Qin and T.A. Badgwell. An overview of nonlinear model predictive control applications.Nonlinear model predictive control, 26:369–392, 2000

  5. [5]

    Est ´evez and M

    E. Est ´evez and M. Marcos. Model-based validation of industrial control systems.IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 8(2):302–310, 2011

  6. [6]

    Y . Yao, Y . Kang, Y . Zhao, P. Li, and J. Tan. A novel prescribed-time control approach of state-constrained high-order nonlinear systems.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2024

  7. [7]

    Ye and Y

    H. Ye and Y . Song. Prescribed-time control for lin- ear systems in canonical form via nonlinear feedback. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 53(2):1126–1135, 2022

  8. [8]

    C. Hua, P. Ning, and K. Li. Adaptive prescribed-time control for a class of uncertain nonlinear systems.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 67(11):6159–6166, 2021. 11

  9. [9]

    Y . Song, H. Ye, and F. L. Lewis. Prescribed-time control and its latest developments.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 53(7):4102– 4116, 2023

  10. [10]

    H. Yan, J. Wang, H. Zhang, H. Shen, and X. Zhan. Event- based security control for stochastic networked systems subject to attacks.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 50(11):4643–4654, 2018

  11. [11]

    R. Ji, S. S. Ge, K. Zhao, and H. Li. Event-triggered tracking control for nonlinear systems with prescribed performance.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2024

  12. [12]

    Liu and G

    D. Liu and G. H. Yang. A dynamic event-triggered control approach to leader-following consensus for linear multiagent systems.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 51(10):6271–6279, 2020

  13. [13]

    Zhang, C

    Z. Zhang, C. Wen, L. Xing, and Y . Song. Adaptive event- triggered control of uncertain nonlinear systems using intermittent output only.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 67(8):4218–4225, 2021

  14. [14]

    Chen and J

    G. Chen and J. Dong. Approximate optimal adaptive prescribed performance control for uncertain nonlinear systems with feature information.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 54(4):2298– 2308, 2024

  15. [15]

    X. Ge, Q. L. Han, L. Ding, Y . L. Wang, and X. M. Zhang. Dynamic event-triggered distributed coordination control and its applications: A survey of trends and techniques. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 50(9):3112–3125, 2020

  16. [16]

    Puerto-Santana, C

    C. Puerto-Santana, C. Ocampo-Martinez, and J. Diaz- Rozo. Mechanical rotor unbalance monitoring based on system identification and signal processing approaches. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 541:117313, 2022

  17. [17]

    Zhang, S

    S. Zhang, S. Lu, Q. He, and F. Kong. Time-varying singular value decomposition for periodic transient iden- tification in bearing fault diagnosis.Journal of Sound and Vibration, 379:213–231, 2016

  18. [18]

    J. Antoni. Fast computation of the kurtogram for the detection of transient faults.Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 21(1):108–124, 2007

  19. [19]

    B. Chen, Z. Zhang, Y . Zi, Z. He, and C. Sun. Detect- ing of transient vibration signatures using an improved fast spatial–spectral ensemble kurtosis kurtogram and its applications to mechanical signature analysis of short duration data from rotating machinery.Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 40(1):1–37, 2013

  20. [20]

    Ureten and N

    O. Ureten and N. Serinken. Wireless security through rf fingerprinting.Canadian Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 32(1):27–33, 2007

  21. [21]

    S. M. Markalous, S. Tenbohlen, and K. Feser. Detection and location of partial discharges in power transform- ers using acoustic and electromagnetic signals.IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, 15(6):1576–1583, 2008

  22. [22]

    Zhang, C

    X. Zhang, C. Cai, and J. Zhang. A transient signal detection technique based on flatness measure. In2011 6th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE), pages 310–312. IEEE, 2011

  23. [23]

    Shaw and W

    D. Shaw and W. Kinsner. Multifractal modelling of radio transmitter transients for classification. InIEEE WESCANEX 97 Communications, Power and Computing. Conference Proceedings, pages 306–312. IEEE, 1997

  24. [24]

    Vasyutynskyy, J

    V . Vasyutynskyy, J. Ploennigs, and K. Kabitzsch. Passive monitoring of control loops in building automation.IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 38(2):263–269, 2005

  25. [25]

    Schladt and B

    M. Schladt and B. Hu. Soft sensors based on nonlinear steady-state data reconciliation in the process industry. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensi- fication, 46(11):1107–1115, 2007

  26. [26]

    Markalous, S

    S. Markalous, S. Tenbohlen, and K. Feser. Detection and location of partial discharges in power transformers using acoustic and electromagnetic signals.IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, 15(6):1576– 1583, 2008

  27. [27]

    Y . Yao, C. Zhao, and F. Gao. Batch-to-batch steady state identification based on variable correlation and Maha- lanobis distance.Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 48(24):11060–11070, 2009

  28. [28]

    R. R. Rhinehart. Automated steady and transient state identification in noisy processes. In2013 American Control Conference, pages 4477–4493, Washington, DC,

  29. [29]

    L. Liu, Z. Liu, M. Popov, P. Palensky, and M.A. van der Meijden. A fast protection of multi-terminal HVDC system based on transient signal detection.IEEE Trans- actions on Power Delivery, 36(1):43–51, 2020

  30. [30]

    Yu and X

    S. Yu and X. Li. Identification of steady state and transient state.Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science), pages 1–10, 2022

  31. [31]

    Williams.Probability with martingales

    D. Williams.Probability with martingales. Cambridge university press, 1991

  32. [32]

    Papoulis and S.U

    A. Papoulis and S.U. Pillai.Probability, Random Vari- ables, and Stochastic Processes. McGraw-Hill series in electrical engineering: Communications and signal processing. Tata McGraw-Hill, 2002

  33. [33]

    Walters.An introduction to ergodic theory, volume 79

    P. Walters.An introduction to ergodic theory, volume 79. Springer Science and Business Media, 2000

  34. [34]

    K. I. Park.Fundamentals of Probability and Stochas- tic Processes with Applications to Communications. Springer International Publishing, 2018

  35. [35]

    Mohammadi

    M. Mohammadi. A new method for prediction of station- ary time series using the Riemann sum approximation. Digital Signal Processing, 123:103405, 2022

  36. [36]

    Gagniuc.Markov Chains: From Theory to Imple- mentation and Experimentation

    P.A. Gagniuc.Markov Chains: From Theory to Imple- mentation and Experimentation. John Wiley & Sons, 2017

  37. [37]

    Gardner, A

    W.A. Gardner, A. Napolitano, and L. Paura. Cyclosta- tionarity: Half a century of research.Signal processing, 86(4):639–697, 2006

  38. [38]

    C., Manfredo.Differential geometry of curves and surfaces: revised and updated second edition

    D. C., Manfredo.Differential geometry of curves and surfaces: revised and updated second edition. Courier Dover Publications, 2016

  39. [39]

    N. Wheeler. Frenet-Serret formulæ in higher dimension. page 8

  40. [40]

    Giunti and C

    M. Giunti and C. Mazzola.Dynamical systems on 12 monoids: toward a general theory of deterministic sys- tems and motion, pages 173–185. World Scientific, 2012

  41. [41]

    Geometrical theory of dynamical systems

    N. Berglund. Geometrical theory of dynamical systems. arXiv preprint math/0111177, 2001

  42. [42]

    J. P. Hespanha.Linear systems theory. Princeton University Press, 2018

  43. [43]

    Amenta, S

    N. Amenta, S. Choi, and R.K. Kolluri. The power crust, unions of balls, and the medial axis transform. Computational Geometry, 19(2-3):127–153, 2001

  44. [44]

    Puerto-Santana, C

    C. Puerto-Santana, C. Puerto-Santana, C. Ocampo- Martinez, and J. Diaz-Rozo. Classifying transient regimes in dynamic systems through properties of spatial curves and stochastic processes: A data-driven approach (supplementary material). https://www.dropbox.com/scl/ fi/5msdqe5rr813x5v609fjn/revised appendix.pdf?rlkey= t1lvctu671gve3gzk7ljr20ih&st=gqjlm3r6&dl=0

  45. [45]

    P. A. Gorry. General least-squares smoothing and differ- entiation by the convolution (Savitzky-Golay) method. Analytical Chemistry, 62(6):570–573, 1990

  46. [46]

    S. T. Yeh. Using trapezoidal rule for the area under a curve calculation.Proceedings of the 27th Annual SAS® User Group International (SUGI’02), pages 1–5, 2002

  47. [47]

    P. B. Petrovic. Root-mean-square measurement of peri- odic, band-limited signals. In2012 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Confer- ence Proceedings, pages 323–327. IEEE, 2012

  48. [48]

    Van den Bos

    A. Van den Bos. Periodic test signals-properties and use. InInternational Conference on Control 1991. Control’91, pages 545–549. IET, 1991

  49. [49]

    Poomjan, T

    S. Poomjan, T. Taengtang, K. Srinuanjan, S. Kamoldilok, and P. Buranasiri. Accurate rms calculations for periodic signals by trapezoidal rule with the least data amount. Studies Theor. Phys., 7(21), 2013

  50. [50]

    Welvaert and Y

    M. Welvaert and Y . Rosseel. On the definition of signal- to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio for fmri data. PloS one, 8(11):e77089, 2013

  51. [51]

    Kamakoti and C

    R. Kamakoti and C. Pantano. High-order narrow stencil finite-difference approximations of second-order deriva- tives involving variable coefficients.SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 31(6):4222–4243, 2010

  52. [52]

    D Powel and K

    N. D Powel and K. A. Morgansen. Empirical observ- ability gramian rank condition for weak observability of nonlinear systems with control. In2015 54th IEEE Con- ference on Decision and Control (CDC), pages 6342–

  53. [53]

    Sedoglavic

    A. Sedoglavic. A probabilistic algorithm to test local algebraic observability in polynomial time. InProceed- ings of the 2001 international symposium on Symbolic and algebraic computation, pages 309–317, 2001

  54. [54]

    A. I. Russell. Regular and irregular signal resampling. Technical report, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2006. Cristian Puerto-Santanareceived his bachellor’s degree in Mechanical and Electrical Engineer from Universidad de los Andes, Bogot ´a, Colombia, in 2016 and 2017, respectively. He obtained his mas- ter’s degree in Automation, Electronics a...