Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 44 references

MiDashengLM-Gen: Unified Audio Scene Generation via LLM-Driven Autoregressive Flow Matching

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that a single end-to-end model can generate mixed audio scenes—speech, music, and sound effects together—with speech intelligibility close to that of dedicated text-to-speech systems, while retaining variable-length and…

desk verdict A credible end-to-end unified audio-scene model with a strong intelligibility result, but the headline WER needs the tokenizer's own reconstruction WER reported before the 2.79% number is interpretable. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.11804 v1 pith:D653BWCJ submitted 2026-08-12 eess.AS cs.SD

Xingwei Sun , Heinrich Dinkel , Gang Li , Jiahao Mei , Yadong Niu , Zerui Han , Yuepeng Jiang , Jiahao Zhou
show 2 more authors
Lichun Fan Jian Luan
This is my paper · ORCID
classification eess.AScs.SD
keywords audioscenegenerationtext-to-audioflowmatchinglargelanguagemodelautoregressivespeechintelligibilitymultilingualmulti-viewcaptions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes an end-to-end framework, MiDashengLM-Gen, that couples a pretrained large language model with per-token conditional flow matching to generate coherent audio scenes containing speech, music, and sound effects. It argues that previous unified models fail because a frozen text encoder is decoupled from the audio decoder, and replaces that design with an LLM that jointly encodes text and audio history, feeding each autoregressive step to a flow-matching decoder. On the Seed-TTS English benchmark, the model reduces word error rate from 12.15% to 2.79%, compared with 1.24% for a dedicated TTS system. The paper also reports competitive music and effects quality on MECAT and multilingual speech intelligibility across nine languages. The central claim is that high-dimensional semantic-acoustic latents, an LLM backbone, and per-token flow matching are sufficient for end-to-end unified audio scene generation.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is per-token conditional flow matching over DashengTokenizer's high-dimensional semantic-acoustic latents, with the LLM hidden state as the conditioning signal. Structured multi-view captions decompose a scene into six textual views—global description, transcript, speaker, effects, music, and environment—each marked by special tokens, letting the LLM condition different control factors separately. An alignment stage first projects 25 Hz encoder frames, grouped to $k=5$ frames into 5 Hz tokens, into the LLM token space; then the LLM autoregressively predicts each token's flow field, and a DiT decoder with width greater than the latent dimension solves a 10-step Euler ODE, with a stop head determining generation length.

What would settle it

Measure the tokenizer's own encode-decode reconstruction WER on the Seed-TTS English test set, encoding speech and decoding with DashengTokenizer plus the vocoder without any LLM generation. If this reconstruction WER is at or above the model's 2.79%, then the LLM contributes none of the claimed intelligibility and the result is bounded by the frozen encoder.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

MiDashengLM-Gen is presented as the first general text-to-audio scene generator trained end to end in a single model: a Qwen3 LLM encodes the structured caption and audio history, and a DiT-based flow-matching decoder produces each 200 ms audio token conditioned on the LLM hidden state. Speech intelligibility measured by WER on Seed-TTS English falls to 2.79%, down from 12.15% for the previous unified model and within a factor of 2.2 of dedicated TTS at 1.24%. The model supports variable-length output through a learned stop head and multilingual generation. The paper identifies two design requirements: an audio-text alignment stage that maps audio latents into the LLM token space before generation training, and a DiT width that strictly exceeds the audio latent dimension for convergence.

Load-bearing premise

The frozen DashengTokenizer encoder is assumed to preserve enough phonetic and acoustic detail, after grouping five 25 Hz frames into one 200 ms token, that near-TTS intelligibility is possible; if this latent space loses phonemic information, no amount of LLM conditioning can recover it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the claims hold, end-to-end LLM-based generation closes most of the intelligibility gap with dedicated TTS, making scene generators usable for dialogue in games and film preproduction.
  • Variable-length generation means one model can produce a 1-to-20-second scene without post-hoc stitching or fixed-duration constraints.
  • Multilingual speech with competitive WERs may reduce the need for separate TTS adapters in mixed-audio pipelines.
  • The width-must-exceed-latent-dimension rule gives a concrete scaling guideline for future LLM-conditioned audio decoders.
  • The alignment-stage ablation suggests that cross-modal token mapping must be learned before generation training, not from scratch.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the tokenizer's own reconstruction WER is not substantially below 2.79%, part of the claimed intelligibility may be inherited from the frozen encoder rather than from the LLM-driven generative process; the paper reports STFT distance but not this ceiling.
  • The 5 Hz grouping into 200 ms tokens likely limits temporal precision for fast consonants and could explain residual gaps in low-resource languages; a testable extension is variable-rate grouping or $k=1$ tokens.
  • The width condition suggests a general principle for any high-dimensional continuous latent: a diffusion decoder's hidden width must exceed latent rank to avoid manifold expansion failure, which may transfer to video and multimodal generation.
  • Because the paper reports only objective metrics, a subjective listening test on scene coherence would be a natural next check; the demo page hints at this but the paper does not include it.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces MiDashengLM-Gen, a unified audio scene generation model that couples a pretrained Qwen3 LLM with per-token conditional flow matching over continuous latents produced by a frozen DashengTokenizer encoder. It uses structured multi-view captions, an audio-text alignment pre-training stage, and a learned stop head to support variable-length, multilingual generation of mixed scenes containing speech, music, and sound effects. Experiments report improved speech intelligibility on the Seed-TTS benchmark (English WER 2.79% vs. 12.15% for Dasheng AudioGen), competitive multilingual WERs on the MiniMax-Speech test set, emotion expressiveness results on CV3-Eval, and mixed-scene generation results on MECAT. Ablations study the importance of audio-text alignment and the scaling of DiT width relative to audio latent dimensionality.

Significance. If the results hold, this is a meaningful advance for unified audio scene generation: it demonstrates that an LLM combined with per-token flow matching over a continuous semantic-acoustic latent can bring speech intelligibility much closer to dedicated TTS systems than prior unified models, while retaining mixed-scene and multilingual capability. The main WER claims are evaluated on external benchmarks (Seed-TTS, MiniMax-Speech, CV3-Eval) rather than only on self-created data, and the authors release code and checkpoints, which are concrete strengths. The use of a self-created tokenizer and MECAT benchmark introduces a mild self-evaluation risk, and the absence of uncertainty quantification tempers the comparative claims.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.1-3.2 and Table 4] The frozen DashengTokenizer encoder and decoder used to produce and reconstruct audio latents define an upper bound on achievable intelligibility, yet the paper never reports the tokenizer's own reconstruction WER on the Seed-TTS benchmark. Figure 3 reports only STFT L2 distance (topline 1.30) and Table 4 reports only generated-audio WER, so the headline comparison of 2.79% to Qwen3-TTS's 1.24% cannot be attributed to the proposed LLM/flow-matching architecture without knowing the codec oracle. If encode-decode through the frozen tokenizer already yields WER near 2.7%, the model is effectively operating at the codec ceiling and the claimed 2.2x gap is dominated by tokenizer loss; if the oracle is much lower, a real generation gap remains. Please report the encode-decode WER/CER of the frozen tokenizer on the same Seed-TTS and multilingual evaluation sets, and discuss how the oracle affects the abstract's claim.
  2. [Section 4.5, Table 10 and Figure 3] The paper claims that 'the DiT width must strictly exceed the audio latent dimensionality' and states this generalizes across LLM scales and latent dimensions, but Table 10 contradicts this: for 1280-dimensional latents with both Qwen3-0.6B and Qwen3-4B, width equal to 1280 converges successfully. Figure 3 only demonstrates failure at width 768 for 768-dimensional latents. Please revise the claim to a threshold phenomenon, explain why equality fails at 768 but succeeds at 1280, and define the criteria used to mark convergence in Table 10.
  3. [Section 4.2-4.4, Tables 4-8] All reported metrics are point estimates without confidence intervals, error bars, or significance tests, while several comparative conclusions rest on small differences (e.g., Table 7 S00 CLAP 0.35 vs. 0.34; Table 8 S0A FAD 1.54 vs. 1.75). Given the emphasis on 'consistently lower FAD' and 'better' claims in Section 4.4, please provide variance estimates or significance tests, such as bootstrap intervals over evaluation items or multiple sampling runs, and temper claims for differences that are not statistically distinguished.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The hyperlinks appear as bare footnote markers (1, 2, 3); please render them as actual URLs in the final version so that the code, checkpoint, and demo links are directly accessible.
  2. [Section 4.5, Table 10] The parameter counts and depth configurations for the 'fixed parameter budget' are not reported; please include them so the convergence comparisons across width/depth trade-offs are reproducible.
  3. [Table 4] A CER value of '>100' is not a valid error rate; please provide the actual values or explain the transcription pathology that produces this result.
  4. [Section 3.2] The sentence 'Instead of full-sequence flow matching that generates the entire audio latent sequence in one pass we perform' is missing punctuation; additionally, define z_hist explicitly in a displayed equation or in the text adjacent to Eq. (3).
  5. [Section 1 and throughout] The claim that MiDashengLM-Gen 'represents a first approach for general text-to-audio generation with one end-to-end trained model' is difficult to verify against related work cited in Section 2 (UniAudio, AudioX, UniFlow-Audio, Dasheng AudioGen); please provide a precise definition of the claimed first or soften the phrasing.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the intelligibility and multilingual claims are measured on external benchmarks; same-group tokenizer and MECAT are inputs/evaluation infrastructure, not re-derived outputs.

full rationale

Score 0. I find no step in which a claimed prediction or derived result is equivalent, by the paper's own equations or by a self-citation chain, to an input or fitted parameter. The central intelligibility claim (EN WER 2.79% vs. Qwen3-TTS 1.24%, Seed-TTS) is an empirical measurement on an externally defined benchmark; nothing in Sections 3.1-3.2 is fitted to that benchmark, and no equation identifies the generated latents with the conditioning captions. The frozen DashengTokenizer/MiDashengLM encoder is reused prior infrastructure rather than a quantity re-derived from the present model, and the absence of a standalone tokenizer-reconstruction WER is a diagnostics gap, not a circular reduction; it does not make the reported number an identity. Similarly, MECAT is a held-out benchmark from the same group, but self-created evaluation data is not a derivation loop unless the model was fitted to it, which the paper does not claim. The 'DiT width must exceed latent dimensionality' observation is presented as an empirical sweep (Table 10) and is explicitly linked to an external theoretical result [44], so it is a fitted empirical pattern rather than a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. Self-citations appear as supporting context (tokenizer, captions, alignment, benchmark), but none carries an unverified 'uniqueness' or 'necessity' premise that forces the headline result. Correctness risks, such as the missing oracle WER or the self-created MECAT benchmark, are limitations or missing baselines, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical or formal entities. Its uncharged inputs are the frozen DashengTokenizer latent space, the pretrained Qwen3 LLM, and several hand-set inference hyperparameters. The width-exceeds-latent-dim rule is presented as an empirical finding but is not independently derived in this paper.

free parameters (3)
  • CFG guidance scale = 2.0
    Hand-set inference hyperparameter that controls conditioning strength; no sensitivity analysis is reported, yet it directly affects the trade-off between intelligibility and acoustic fidelity.
  • Stop threshold tau = 0.5
    Chosen threshold for the learned stop head; determines output length and could bias WER if it truncates speech, but no ablation is reported.
  • Stop loss weight lambda = 0.01
    Hand-set weight combining the stop-head loss with the flow-matching loss; no ablation is reported.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Flow matching with an Euler ODE solver correctly estimates the generative vector field.
    Section 3.2 directly adopts Lipman et al. flow matching; standard background result.
  • domain assumption The frozen DashengTokenizer latent space retains enough semantic and acoustic detail for generation.
    Section 3.1 freezes the encoder; the paper provides no reconstruction WER for speech to establish this ceiling.
  • domain assumption Grouping 5 latent frames into a 200 ms token preserves phonetic detail needed for intelligible speech.
    Equation (1) defines this grouping; no ablation varies k.
  • domain assumption Qwen3's pretrained language capabilities transfer to audio-centric token sequences after fine-tuning.
    Section 3.1 relies on this transfer; only end-task metrics indirectly support it.
  • domain assumption The width-rank convergence principle from image diffusion transfers to audio latents.
    Section 4.5 generalizes Zheng et al. to audio with a small set of overfit runs.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of MiDashengLM-Gen: Unified Audio Scene Generation via LLM-Driven Autoregressive Flow Matching." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/D653BWCJ

@misc{pith2026260811804,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: MiDashengLM-Gen: Unified Audio Scene Generation via LLM-Driven Autoregressive Flow Matching},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/D653BWCJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.11804}
}
read the original abstract

Generating coherent audio scenes that simultaneously blend speech, music, and sound effects remains a significant challenge. Current approaches typically rely on a disjointed pipeline where a frozen, decoupled text encoder feeds a separate audio decoder, limiting cross-modal optimization and leading to poor speech intelligibility. To overcome these limitations, we introduce MiDashengLM-Gen, an end-to-end framework that couples a pre-trained Large Language Model (LLM) with per-token conditional flow matching for autoregressive, variable-length mixed-audio scene generation. MiDashengLM-Gen represents a first approach for general text-to-audio generation with one end-to-end trained model. Empirical evaluations demonstrate that MiDashengLM-Gen drastically improves speech intelligibility over existing unified models. On the Seed-TTS benchmark, English Word Error Rate (WER) drops from 12.15% to 2.79%, approaching the performance of dedicated Text-to-Speech (TTS) systems (1.24%). Furthermore, the framework extends effectively to multilingual settings, yielding highly competitive multilingual WERs compared to existing baselines. Lastly, the model maintains competitive mixed-audio generation quality on the MECAT benchmark. Code and checkpoints are available at https://github.com/xiaomi-research/midashenglm-gen and https://huggingface.co/mispeech/midashenglm-gen, and the demo page is available at https://xingws.github.io/midashenglm-gen-demo/.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.11804 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Training and inference pipelines. 3.1 Autoregressive LLM Backbone We employ a pre-trained causal language model (Qwen3 [26]) as the sequential backbone for audio scene generation. Unlike prior unified models that require separate text encoders (e.g., T5) and cross￾attention mechanisms, our approach uses the LLM’s pre-trained representations to jointly encode text and audio within a single unified model. This elimina… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Audio-text alignment in the DashengTokenizer latent space via general caption supervision. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Training loss and STFT L2 distance curves for different DiT width/depth configurations. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Qwen3-tts technical report

    Hangrui Hu, Xinfa Zhu, Ting He, Dake Guo, Bin Zhang, Xiong Wang, Zhifang Guo, Ziyue Jiang, Hongkun Hao, Zishan Guo, Xinyu Zhang, Pei Zhang, Baosong Yang, Jin Xu, Jingren Zhou, and Junyang Lin. Qwen3-tts technical report. 2026. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.15621

    arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    Seed-tts: A family of high-quality versatile speech generation models

    Philip Anastassiou, Jui Chung, Aaditya Deepak, Sefik Emre Florez, Yunyang He, Shun Jiang, Tom Kaftan, Jia Li, Fangxun Lin, Yanxi Luo, et al. Seed-tts: A family of high-quality versatile speech generation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.02430, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    Simple and controllable music generation

    Jade Copet, Felix Kreuk, Itai Gat, Tal Remez, David Kant, Gabriel Synnaeve, Yossi Adi, and Alexandre Défossez. Simple and controllable music generation. In Advances in Neural Informa- tion Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2023

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    Denk, Zalán Borsos, Jesse Engel, Mauro Verzetti, Antoine Caillon, Qingqing Huang, Aren Jansen, Adam Roberts, Marco Tagliasacchi, Matt Sharifi, Neil Zeghidour, and Christian Frank

    Andrea Agostinelli, Timo I. Denk, Zalán Borsos, Jesse Engel, Mauro Verzetti, Antoine Caillon, Qingqing Huang, Aren Jansen, Adam Roberts, Marco Tagliasacchi, Matt Sharifi, Neil Zeghidour, and Christian Frank. MusicLM: Generating music from text. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML Workshop), 2023

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Plumbley

    Haohe Liu, Zehua Chen, Yi Yuan, Xinhao Mei, Xubo Liu, Danilo Mandic, Wenwu Wang, and Mark D. Plumbley. Audioldm: Text-to-audio generation with latent diffusion models. In Inter- national Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2023

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Tangoflux: Super fast and faith- ful text to audio generation with flow matching and clap-ranked preference optimization

    Chia-Yu Hung, Navonil Majumder, Zhifeng Kong, Ambuj Mehrish, Amir Ali Bagherzadeh, Chuan Li, Rafael Valle, Bryan Catanzaro, and Soujanya Poria. Tangoflux: Super fast and faith- ful text to audio generation with flow matching and clap-ranked preference optimization. 2024. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.21037

    arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Uniaudio: An audio foundation model toward universal audio generation

    Dongchao Yang, Jinchuan Tian, Xu Tan, Rongjie Huang, Songxiang Liu, Xuankai Chang, Ji- atong Shi, Sheng Zhao, Jiang Bian, Zhou Zhao, Xixin Wu, and Helen Meng. Uniaudio: An audio foundation model toward universal audio generation. In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2024

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Uniflow-audio: Unified flow matching for audio generation from omni-modalities

    Xuenan Xu, Jiahao Mei, Zihao Zheng, Ye Tao, Zeyu Xie, Yaoyun Zhang, Haohe Liu, Yuning Wu, Ming Yan, Wen Wu, Chao Zhang, and Mengyue Wu. Uniflow-audio: Unified flow matching for audio generation from omni-modalities. 2025. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.24391

    arXiv 2025

Show all 44 references
  1. [9]

    Dasheng audiogen: A unified model for generating coherent audio scenes from text

    Jiahao Mei, Heinrich Dinkel, Yadong Niu, Xingwei Sun, Gang Li, Yifan Liao, Jiahao Zhou, Junbo Zhang, Jian Luan, and Mengyue Wu. Dasheng audiogen: A unified model for generating coherent audio scenes from text. arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.27838, 2026

    2026 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Denoising diffusion probabilistic models

    Jonathan Ho and Pieter Jain, Ajay Abbeel. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), volume 33, pages 6840–6851, 2020

    2020

  3. [11]

    Yaron Lipman, Ricky T. Q. Chen, Heli Ben-Hamu, Maximilian Nicklas, Matt Le, Moham- mad Esmaeilpour, and Aditya Grover. Flow matching for generative modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02747, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Make-an-audio: Text-to-audio generation with prompt- enhanced diffusion models

    Rongjie Huang, Jiawei Huang, Dongchao Yang, Yi Ren, Luping Liu, Mingze Li, Zhenhui Ye, Jinglin Liu, Xiang Yin, and Zhou Zhao. Make-an-audio: Text-to-audio generation with prompt- enhanced diffusion models. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2023

    2023

  5. [13]

    Plumbley

    Haohe Liu, Yi Yuan, Xubo Liu, Xinhao Mei, Qiuqiang Kong, Qiao Tian, Yuping Wang, Wenwu Wang, Yuxuan Wang, and Mark D. Plumbley. Audioldm 2: Learning holistic audio generation with self-supervised pretraining. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Pro- cessing, 2023

    2023

  6. [14]

    Jen-1: Text-guided universal music generation with omnidirectional diffusion models

    Peike Li, Boyu Chen, Yuying Li, and Yaolong Li. Jen-1: Text-guided universal music generation with omnidirectional diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.04729, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Weiss, Mike Schuster, Navdeep Jaitly, Zongheng Yang, Zhifeng Chen, Yu Zhang, Yuxuan Wang, Rj Skerrv-Ryan, Rif A

    Jonathan Shen, Ruoming Pang, Ron J. Weiss, Mike Schuster, Navdeep Jaitly, Zongheng Yang, Zhifeng Chen, Yu Zhang, Yuxuan Wang, Rj Skerrv-Ryan, Rif A. Saurous, Yannis Agiomvrgian- nakis, and Yonghui Wu. Natural tts synthesis by conditioning wavenet on mel spectrogram pre- dictio...

    2018

  8. [16]

    Fastspeech: Fast, robust and controllable text to speech

    Yi Ren, Yangjun Ruan, Xu Tan, Tao Qin, Sheng Zhao, Zhou Zhao, and Tie-Yan Liu. Fastspeech: Fast, robust and controllable text to speech. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2019

    2019

  9. [17]

    Conditional variational autoencoder with adversarial learning for end-to-end text-to-speech

    Jaehyeon Kim, Jungil Kong, and Juhee Son. Conditional variational autoencoder with adversarial learning for end-to-end text-to-speech. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2021

    2021

  10. [18]

    Neural codec language models are zero-shot text to speech synthesizers

    Chengyi Wang, Sanyuan Chen, Yu Wu, Ziqiang Zhang, Long Zhou, Shujie Liu, Zhuo Chen, Yanqing Liu, Huaming Wang, Jinyu Li, et al. Neural codec language models are zero-shot text to speech synthesizers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.02111, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Soundstorm: Efficient parallel audio generation

    Zalán Borsos, Matt Sharifi, Damien Vincent, Eugene Kharitonov, Neil Zeghidour, and Marco Tagliasacchi. Soundstorm: Efficient parallel audio generation. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2023

    2023

  12. [20]

    Minimax- speech: Intrinsic zero-shot text-to-speech with a learnable speaker encoder

    Bowen Zhang, Yichong Gu, Xin Jiang, Jian Li, Jiang Bian, and Deng Cai. Minimax- speech: Intrinsic zero-shot text-to-speech with a learnable speaker encoder. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.07916, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  13. [21]

    F5-tts: A fairytaler that fakes fluent and faithful speech with flow matching

    Yushen Chen, Zhikang Niu, Ziyang Ma, Keqi Deng, Chunhui Wang, Jian Zhao, Kai Yu, and Xie Chen. F5-tts: A fairytaler that fakes fluent and faithful speech with flow matching. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.06885, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Cosyvoice 3: Multi-lingual multi-timbre multi-style speech generation with controllable emotion

    Zhihao Du, Qian Chen, Siqi Zheng, Zhifu Wen, Yanmin Li, Shiliang Wu, and Jian Lu. Cosyvoice 3: Multi-lingual multi-timbre multi-style speech generation with controllable emotion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.17589, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Audiox: Diffusion transformer for anything-to-audio generation

    Zeyue Tian, Yizhu Jin, Zhaoyang Liu, Ruibin Yuan, Xu Tan, Qifeng Chen, Wei Xue, and Yike Guo. Audiox: Diffusion transformer for anything-to-audio generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.10522, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Bagpiper: Solving open-ended audio tasks via rich captions

    Jinchuan Tian, Haoran Wang, Bo-Hao Su, Chien-yu Huang, Qingzheng Wang, Jiatong Shi, William Chen, Xun Gong, Siddhant Arora, Chin-Jou Li, et al. Bagpiper: Solving open-ended audio tasks via rich captions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.05220, 2026

    2026 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Dashengtokenizer: One layer is enough for unified audio understanding and generation

    Heinrich Dinkel, Xingwei Sun, Gang Li, Jiahao Mei, Yadong Niu, Jizhong Liu, Xiyang Li, Yifan Liao, Jiahao Zhou, Junbo Zhang, and Jian Luan. Dashengtokenizer: One layer is enough for unified audio understanding and generation. 2026. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.23765

    2026

  18. [26]

    Qwen3 technical report

    An Yang, Baosong Yang, Beichen Zhang, Binyuan Hui, Bo Wang, et al. Qwen3 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09388, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Midashenglm: Efficient audio understanding with general audio captions

    Heinrich Dinkel, Gang Li, Jizhong Liu, Jian Luan, Yadong Niu, Xingwei Sun, Tianzi Wang, Qiyang Xiao, Junbo Zhang, and Jiahao Zhou. Midashenglm: Efficient audio understanding with general audio captions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.03983, 2025

    2025

  20. [28]

    Vocos: Closing the gap between time-domain and fourier-based neural vocoders for high-quality audio synthesis

    Hubert Siuzdak. Vocos: Closing the gap between time-domain and fourier-based neural vocoders for high-quality audio synthesis. In ICLR, 2024

    2024

  21. [29]

    Llm.int8(): 8-bit matrix multiplication for transformers at scale

    Tim Dettmers, Mike Lewis, Younes Belkada, and Luke Zettlemoyer. Llm.int8(): 8-bit matrix multiplication for transformers at scale. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35, 2022

    2022

  22. [30]

    Acavcaps: Enabling large-scale training for fine-grained and diverse audio understanding

    Yadong Niu, Tianzi Wang, Heinrich Dinkel, Xingwei Sun, Jiahao Zhou, Gang Li, Jizhong Liu, Junbo Zhang, and Jian Luan. Acavcaps: Enabling large-scale training for fine-grained and diverse audio understanding. In ICASSP 2026-2026 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speec...

    2026

  23. [31]

    Acav100m: Automatic curation of large-scale datasets for audio-visual video represen- tation learning

    Sangho Lee, Jiwan Chung, Youngjae Yu, Gunhee Kim, Thomas Breuel, Gal Chechik, and Yale Song. Acav100m: Automatic curation of large-scale datasets for audio-visual video represen- tation learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , page...

    2021

  24. [32]

    Emilia: An extensive, multilingual, and diverse speech dataset for large-scale speech generation

    Haorui He, Zengqiang Shang, Chaoren Wang, Xuyuan Li, Yicheng Gu, Hua Hua, Liwei Liu, Chen Yang, Jiaqi Li, Peiyang Shi, et al. Emilia: An extensive, multilingual, and diverse speech dataset for large-scale speech generation. In IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT), 2024

    2024

  25. [33]

    Weiss, Viet Dang, Ye Jia, Yonghui Wu, Yu Zhang, and Zhifeng Chen

    Heiga Zen, Rob Clark, Ron J. Weiss, Viet Dang, Ye Jia, Yonghui Wu, Yu Zhang, and Zhifeng Chen. Libritts: A corpus derived from librispeech for text-to-speech. In Interspeech, 2019

    2019

  26. [34]

    The LJ speech dataset

    Keith Ito and Linda Johnson. The LJ speech dataset. https://keithito.com/ LJ-Speech-Dataset/ , 2017

    2017

  27. [35]

    AISHELL-3: A multi-speaker mandarin TTS corpus and the baselines

    Yao Shi, Hui Bu, Xin Xu, Shaoji Zhang, and Ming Li. AISHELL-3: A multi-speaker mandarin TTS corpus and the baselines. In Interspeech, 2021

    2021

  28. [36]

    WenetSpeech4TTS: A 12,800-hour mandarin TTS corpus for large-scale speech generation

    Linhan Ma, Yue Du, Ziyang Wang, Qijie Ye, Haoyue Bai, Ziyue Zhang, Xuenan Xu, Dong Yu, Zhuo Wang, and Benyou Fan. WenetSpeech4TTS: A 12,800-hour mandarin TTS corpus for large-scale speech generation. In Interspeech, 2024

    2024

  29. [37]

    Audiocaps: Gener- ating captions for audios in the wild

    Chris Dongjoo Kim, Byeongchang Kim, Hyunmin Lee, and Gunhee Kim. Audiocaps: Gener- ating captions for audios in the wild. In Proceedings of the Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL), 2019

    2019

  30. [38]

    Funasr: A fundamental end-to-end speech recognition toolkit

    Zhifu Gao, Shiliang Zhang, Ian McLoughlin, and Zhijie Yan. Funasr: A fundamental end-to-end speech recognition toolkit. In Interspeech, 2023

    2023

  31. [39]

    Robust speech recognition via large-scale weak supervision

    Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Tao Xu, Greg Brockman, Christine McLeavey, and Ilya Sutskever. Robust speech recognition via large-scale weak supervision. International Confer- ence on Machine Learning , 2023

    2023

  32. [40]

    emotion2vec: Self-supervised pre-training for speech emotion representation

    Ziyang Ma, Zhisheng Zheng, Jiaxin Ye, Jinchao Li, Zhifu Gao, Shiliang Zhang, and Xie Chen. emotion2vec: Self-supervised pre-training for speech emotion representation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.15185, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Mecat: A multi-experts constructed benchmark for fine-grained audio understanding tasks

    Yadong Niu, Tianzi Wang, Heinrich Dinkel, Xingwei Sun, Jiahao Zhou, Gang Li, Jizhong Liu, Xunying Liu, Junbo Zhang, and Jian Luan. Mecat: A multi-experts constructed benchmark for fine-grained audio understanding tasks. 2025. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.23511

    2025 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Fréchet audio distance: A reference-free metric for evaluating music enhancement algorithms

    Kevin Kilgour, Mauricio Zuberı, Dominik Roblek, and Matt Sharifi. Fréchet audio distance: A reference-free metric for evaluating music enhancement algorithms. In Interspeech, 2019

    2019

  35. [43]

    CLAP: Learn- ing audio concepts from natural language supervision

    Benjamin Elizalde, Soham Deshmukh, Mahmoud Al Ismail, and Huaming Wang. CLAP: Learn- ing audio concepts from natural language supervision. InIEEE International Conference on Acous- tics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2023

    2023

  36. [44]

    Diffusion transformers with rep- resentation autoencoders

    Boyang Zheng, Nanye Ma, Shengbang Tong, and Saining Xie. Diffusion transformers with rep- resentation autoencoders. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.11690, 2025. 14

    2025 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.