Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 145 references

Modelling broad emission lines in active galactic nuclei

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that dust sublimation sets both the inner and outer edges of the broad-line region, and radiation pressure confinement sets its cloud density.

desk verdict A useful review of BLR formation with a framing caveat: the abstract's 'current state' overstates the FRADO inner-radius prediction, which the text itself only calls 'likely'. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.00742 v2 pith:DBQ2PYR5 submitted 2019-08-02 astro-ph.GA

Bozena Czerny This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords activegalacticnucleibroadlineregionreverberationmappingdustsublimationradiationpressureconfinementaccretiondiskwindsFRADOradius-luminosityrelation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The broad emission lines of active galactic nuclei are the main route to measuring supermassive black hole masses, yet how the emitting medium forms has remained unresolved. This review draws the modelling threads into a single picture: the outer edge of the broad-line region is where dust in the irradiated gas sublimates, the inner edge is where the unilluminated accretion disk's own atmosphere reaches the dust sublimation temperature and puffs up, and the local density of the clouds is a universal number set by radiation pressure balance. If this picture holds, the radius–luminosity relation used for black-hole mass estimates follows from the disk's temperature profile alone, with no extra free parameters. The review surveys the competing origin scenarios—inflow, in-situ formation, the irradiated disk surface, and disk winds—and identifies time-dependent behaviour, as seen in changing-look active galactic nuclei, as the next observational frontier.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the failed radiatively accelerated dusty outflow, FRADO, a wind launched by radiation pressure on dust that falls back once the dust evaporates. In the upper atmosphere of the accretion disk, which is not yet illuminated by the central source, the opacity is controlled by Planck-mean dust absorption rather than by the Rosseland mean that governs the disk interior. Because the Planck mean exceeds the Rosseland mean, radiation pressure from the disk's own flux lifts the atmosphere; the lifted material then becomes exposed to the central radiation, its dust sublimates, the radiation-pressure force switches off, and the material falls back. The height of the resulting equilibrium surface, where gravity balances radiation pressure, sets the inner radius of the broad-line region, and the scaling of that radius with the disk's monochromatic flux gives the radius–luminosity relation. Two further mechanisms complete the picture: dust sublimation in the irradiated medium sets the outer radius, and radiation pressure confinement sets the local cloud density.

What would settle it

Measure the Planck-mean and Rosseland-mean opacities of realistic dust grains at the temperature and density of the disk atmosphere; if the Planck mean is not the larger, the FRADO launcher fails. Alternatively, a large reverberation-mapping sample that shows the inner BLR radius depends on black-hole mass or accretion rate at fixed luminosity—beyond what inclination and anisotropic emission can explain—would falsify the claim that the inner radius is fixed solely by the disk's dust-sublimation temperature.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the Broad Line Region's location and physical state are not accidents of cloud dynamics but consequences of dust and radiation pressure. The outer radius is set by the dust sublimation temperature in the medium exposed to the central source's irradiation: beyond that point, dust grains absorb the ionizing photons and the line emissivity collapses, so the broad-line emission effectively stops. The inner radius is likely set by the dust sublimation temperature in the atmosphere of the non-illuminated accretion disk: inside that radius the disk surface is too hot for dust to survive, the radiation-pressure launch mechanism cannot operate, and the region simply has no cold, line-emitting material. The local cloud density is a universal number fixed by radiation pressure confinement, roughly $10^{11}\ \mathrm{cm}^{-3}$, independent of the source parameters. The review endorses this as the current state of the field: the outer radius is established, the inner radius is likely, and the density is universal, while time-dependent aspects of region formation remain unmodelled.

Load-bearing premise

The inner-radius prediction rests on the assumption that dust in the unilluminated upper layers of the accretion disk absorbs radiation more efficiently than the deeper disk does, so those layers are lifted by radiation pressure before the central source's light reaches them; if the Planck-mean opacity does not exceed the Rosseland-mean opacity there, the FRADO launch mechanism does not operate.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The radius–luminosity relation used for single-epoch black-hole mass estimates gains a theoretical derivation: the inner BLR radius tracks the disk's monochromatic flux with no separate dependence on black-hole mass or accretion rate.
  • The apparent gap between the broad-line region and the narrow-line region becomes a dust effect, and sources with high local cloud density should show continuous line emission across the sublimation radius, with only Fe II dropping sharply there.
  • Locally optimally emitting cloud models no longer need a free power-law density distribution; radiation pressure confinement fixes the local density at each radius to a universal value.
  • A full three-dimensional FRADO model with calculated line profiles would allow black-hole masses to be derived directly from the model, without a virial factor.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same dust-sublimation logic implies that during a changing-look transition, the timescale for broad lines to vanish or reappear should be governed by the dust sublimation and re-formation timescale, not the orbital timescale of the clouds; a campaign that tracks the line disappearance together with the near-infrared dust continuum could separate the two.
  • Because the FRADO inner radius depends on the disk's effective temperature profile, it should also depend on the shape of the spectral energy distribution; splitting a reverberation-mapping sample by UV-to-optical flux ratio could reveal a residual in the radius–luminosity relation that the current best-fit slope absorbs.
  • The Planck-mean versus Rosseland-mean opacity contrast depends on the dust grain size distribution, so the model predicts that the BLR inner edge should shift with grain properties; measurements of the inner radius across cosmic time could therefore become a probe of dust evolution in AGN.
  • With optical interferometry now able to resolve the BLR, the FRADO geometry predicts that the inner edge should appear as a vertically extended, puffed-up structure in lines like Paschen alpha rather than a thin inclined disk, making the vertical structure directly testable.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This invited review surveys the observational and theoretical status of the broad line region (BLR) in active galactic nuclei. It reviews reverberation mapping results, virial black-hole mass measurements, parametric BLR models, the physical conditions in the emitting clouds, and the main proposed origins of the BLR: infall, in-situ formation, irradiated disk surface, and disk winds. Within the disk-wind framework it discusses magnetic, thermal, line-radiation-pressure, and dust-radiation-pressure driving mechanisms, with particular attention to the author's FRADO model. The paper's central synthesis, stated in the abstract and developed in Sects. 4-7 and 10, is that the outer BLR radius is fixed by dust sublimation in the medium irradiated by the central source, the inner radius is likely fixed by dust sublimation in the non-illuminated disk atmosphere, and the local cloud density is a universal number set by radiation-pressure confinement. The review also discusses time-dependent line-profile changes and changing-look AGN, arguing that this is the next frontier for BLR modelling.

Significance. If the three-element synthesis is correct, it would provide a physically motivated explanation of the BLR's key scales and of the empirical radius-luminosity relation, which would directly affect black-hole mass measurements and cosmological uses of AGN. The review is comprehensive and generally careful: it explicitly separates established results (Keplerian rotation, flattened distribution, dust-set outer radius from Netzer & Laor 1993) from model-dependent proposals, and it flags preliminary and unpublished results. The paper is useful as an entry point to the field and as a statement of the FRADO programme. Its main weakness is that the abstract's 'current state' formulation promotes one model-dependent prediction, the FRADO inner radius, to the same level as the observationally supported outer-radius and density-confinement results, while the body itself describes the inner-radius mechanism as an 'attractive explanation' whose underlying disk/opacity assumptions are not yet firmly established. This is a framing issue rather than a logical error in the review.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract; Sect. 10] The abstract's 'current state' sentence states that the inner BLR radius is 'likely fixed by the dust sublimation temperature in the atmosphere of the non-illuminated accretion disk,' but Sect. 10 concludes only that some models bring an 'attractive explanation' of the inner radius and that the BLR/accretion disk relation 'remains to be firmly established.' Because this abstract sentence is the paper's central synthesis, it overstates the strength of the evidence presented in the body. Please align the abstract with the conclusion, for example by writing 'the leading model proposes' rather than 'the current state is,' or by explicitly appending the disk-extension caveat to the abstract.
  2. [Sect. 7.3.2] The text says that FRADO 'well explains the location of the inner radius of the BLR' and 'explains quantitatively the radius-luminosity relation.' These statements rest on two premises: the disk must extend to the dust-sublimation radius (flagged in Sect. 6.4 as a general theoretical requirement), and the Planck-mean opacity in the upper disk atmosphere must exceed the Rosseland-mean opacity in the disk interior. The manuscript identifies the opacity contrast as an assumption and cites an unpublished calculation ('M. Naddaf, in preparation') for the equilibrium surface height. Given that the supporting calculation is not shown and the opacity contrast is load-bearing for the abstract's inner-radius claim, please soften 'well explains' and 'explains quantitatively' to 'would explain' / 'predicts,' or include the needed calculation and its assumptions.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] The manuscript contains numerous typographical and formatting errors (for example, 'full with half maximum,' 'in he emitting medium,' 'a detail studies,' 'teoreticians,' 'test ov various methods,' 'higher that the Rosseland mean,' 'But ther e is a revived'). A thorough copyedit is needed.
  2. [Sect. 2] An unresolved LaTeX citation appears in the text as 'citealtpeterson1998'; this should be replaced by a proper literature citation, presumably Peterson et al. (1998).
  3. [Sect. 1] The abstract and concluding sentence of Sect. 10 contain grammatical issues: 'The current state is the outer radius' lacks a relative pronoun, and 'conclusions are comments on the future progress are given in Sect. 10' is ungrammatical.
  4. [Sect. 4.1] The phrase 'more massive, type A quasars' is ambiguous; it should be clarified whether 'type A' refers to the quasar main-sequence classification from Sulentic et al. (2000) and the comma should be removed or replaced by an explicit conjunction.
  5. [Sect. 7.3.2] The sentence 'Preliminary results show that the model is promising (Czerny et al., 2015, 2017) but the line profiles must be calculated more carefully using 3-D cloud motion instead of 1-D approximation' would read more clearly as two sentences, and the 3-D status of the cited papers should be stated explicitly.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 3.0 of 10

FRADO inner-radius synthesis rests on a self-cited opacity assumption; the text itself calls the model preliminary.

  1. self citation load bearing [Abstract; Sect. 7.3.2 (Dust-driven wind); Sect. 10]
    "The current state is ... the inner radius is likely fixed by the dust sublimation temperature in the atmosphere of the non-illuminated accretion disk ... FRADO outflow is based on the assumption that the opacity in the upper atmosphere of the disk, determined as the Planck mean is higher that the Rosseland mean opacity applicable in the disk interior, so there is a gap between the disk atmosphere in hydrostatic equilibrium and the surface where gravity balances the radiation pressure (Czerny et al., 2017). Realistic estimates ..."

    The review presents the FRADO inner-radius claim as part of the 'current state' synthesis, but the only support offered for it is the author's own prior model. The load-bearing launch condition is itself an assumed opacity contrast (Planck mean exceeding Rosseland mean), documented by self-citation to Czerny et al. (2017) and an unpublished 'M. Naddaf, in preparation' calculation. No independent verification or externally falsifiable test is provided in this paper. The same section calls the model results 'preliminary,' and Sect. 10 concedes that 'the BLR/accretion disk relation remains to be firmly established.' Thus the abstract's definite wording converts a self-cited, assumption-dependent model prediction into a review-level result.

full rationale

This is a review, not a new first-principles derivation, so no formal equivalence between predicted and input quantities can be exhibited. The outer-radius and local-cloud-density pillars of the synthesis are attributed to independent work (Netzer & Laor 1993 and Baskin & Laor 2018, respectively). The only step approaching circularity is the abstract's inner-radius statement, which depends on the author's own FRADO model. The body explicitly calls the launch condition an 'assumption,' supports it via self-citation and an in-preparation calculation, and later concedes the underlying disk/BLR relation is not firmly established. Because the paper itself qualifies the model as 'preliminary' and 'likely,' the issue is one of evidentiary framing and load-bearing self-citation, not a constructed reduction of output to input. Score 3 reflects this partial dependence while acknowledging the qualifying language and the independence of the other two synthesized scales.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new free parameters, entities, or mathematical axioms. Its synthesis relies on standard AGN assumptions plus the three cited mechanism papers. No fitting is performed.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Standard geometrically thin, optically thick accretion disk extends into the BLR.
    Used throughout Sects. 6.4 and 7.3.2; the FRADO inner-radius prediction requires the disk to reach the dust sublimation radius.
  • domain assumption Dust sublimation temperature is a single universal value (around 1500 K) for the relevant grains.
    Sets both inner and outer BLR radii in Sects. 4.1 and 7.3.2.
  • domain assumption Radiation pressure confinement sets the cloud density independently of source parameters.
    Adopted from Baskin & Laor (2018) in Sect. 5 to explain the universal density of about 10^11 cm^-3.
  • domain assumption BLR material is predominantly in Keplerian motion.
    Stated from observations in Sect. 2 and used in mass estimates in Sect. 3.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Modelling broad emission lines in active galactic nuclei." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DBQ2PYR5

@misc{pith2026190800742,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Modelling broad emission lines in active galactic nuclei},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DBQ2PYR5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.00742}
}
read the original abstract

Broad Emission Lines are the most characteristic features of Active Galaxies, but the mechanism of creating a medium able to emit these intense lines is not quite clear. Observations clearly indicate that the motion of the material is predominantly Keplerian, with traces of inflow and clear signatures of outflow, but this still does not point out whether the lines partially come from the disk surface, or exclusively from the circumnuclear material, and whether this material originates from the disk as a wind, or comes, at least partially, from outside. I review the basic scenarios for the formation of the Broad Line Region (BLR), and the recent progress in modelling the physical conditions in the emitting medium. The current state is the the outer radius of the BLR is fixed by the dust sublimation temperature in the medium exposed to the irradiation from the central source, the inner radius is likely fixed by the dust sublimation temperature in the atmosphere of the non-illuminated accretion disk, and the local cloud density is a universal number fixed by the radiation pressure confinement. The time-dependent aspects of the BLR formation, however, still wait for serious modelling effort matching the quality of the observational data.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

145 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ""...

  3. [3]

    P., Hryniewicz , K., R \'o \.z a \'n ska , A., Czerny , B., & Ferland , G

    Adhikari , T. P., Hryniewicz , K., R \'o \.z a \'n ska , A., Czerny , B., & Ferland , G. J. 2018, , 856, 78, 10.3847/1538-4357/aab350

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aab350 2018

  4. [4]

    P., R \'o \.z a \'n ska , A., Czerny , B., Hryniewicz , K., & Ferland , G

    Adhikari , T. P., R \'o \.z a \'n ska , A., Czerny , B., Hryniewicz , K., & Ferland , G. J. 2016, , 831, 68, 10.3847/0004-637X/831/1/68

    doi:10.3847/0004-637x/831/1/68 2016

  5. [5]

    A., & Hawley , J

    Balbus , S. A., & Hawley , J. F. 1991, , 376, 214, 10.1086/170270

    doi:10.1086/170270 1991

  6. [6]

    1995, , 455, L119, 10.1086/309827

    Baldwin , J., Ferland , G., Korista , K., & Verner , D. 1995, , 455, L119, 10.1086/309827

    doi:10.1086/309827 1995

  7. [7]

    2018, , 474, 1970, 10.1093/mnras/stx2850

    Baskin , A., & Laor , A. 2018, , 474, 1970, 10.1093/mnras/stx2850

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2850 2018

  8. [8]

    C., McKee , C

    Begelman , M. C., McKee , C. F., & Shields , G. A. 1983, , 271, 70, 10.1086/161178

    doi:10.1086/161178 1983

Show all 145 references
  1. [9]

    C., Denney , K

    Bentz , M. C., Denney , K. D., Grier , C. J., et al. 2013, , 767, 149, 10.1088/0004-637X/767/2/149

    2013 doi

  2. [10]

    2012, Advances in Astronomy, 2012, 782030, 10.1155/2012/782030

    Bianchi , S., Maiolino , R., & Risaliti , G. 2012, Advances in Astronomy, 2012, 782030, 10.1155/2012/782030

    2012 doi

  3. [11]

    2019, , 488, L1, 10.1093/mnrasl/slz080

    Bianchi , S., Antonucci , R., Capetti , A., et al. 2019, , 488, L1, 10.1093/mnrasl/slz080

    2019 doi

  4. [12]

    D., & Begelman , M

    Blandford , R. D., & Begelman , M. C. 1999, , 303, L1, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02358.x

    1999

  5. [13]

    D., & Payne , D

    Blandford , R. D., & Payne , D. G. 1982, , 199, 883, 10.1093/mnras/199.4.883

    1982 doi

  6. [14]

    2012, , 759, 118, 10.1088/0004-637X/759/2/118

    Bon , E., Jovanovi \'c , P., Marziani , P., et al. 2012, , 759, 118, 10.1088/0004-637X/759/2/118

    2012 doi

  7. [15]

    2016, , 225, 29, 10.3847/0067-0049/225/2/29

    Bon , E., Zucker , S., Netzer , H., et al. 2016, , 225, 29, 10.3847/0067-0049/225/2/29

    2016 doi

  8. [16]

    A., & Green , R

    Boroson , T. A., & Green , R. F. 1992, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 80, 109, 10.1086/191661

    1992 doi

  9. [17]

    2018, , 478, 3199, 10.1093/mnras/sty1026

    Britzen , S., Fendt , C., Witzel , G., et al. 2018, , 478, 3199, 10.1093/mnras/sty1026

    2018 doi

  10. [18]

    S., Wills , B

    Brotherton , M. S., Wills , B. J., Steidel , C. C., & Sargent , W. L. W. 1994, The Astrophysical Journal, 423, 131, 10.1086/173794

    1994 doi

  11. [19]

    2008, The Astrophysical Journal, 675, 83, 10.1086/525557

    Bruhweiler , F., & Verner , E. 2008, The Astrophysical Journal, 675, 83, 10.1086/525557

    2008 doi

  12. [20]

    M., Chiang , C.-Y., McHardy , I., et al

    Cackett , E. M., Chiang , C.-Y., McHardy , I., et al. 2018, , 857, 53, 10.3847/1538-4357/aab4f7

    2018 doi

  13. [21]

    1980, , 241, 903, 10.1086/158404

    Capriotti , E., Foltz , C., & Byard , P. 1980, , 241, 903, 10.1086/158404

    1980 doi

  14. [22]

    1996, , 466, 704, 10.1086/177543

    Chiang , J., & Murray , N. 1996, , 466, 704, 10.1086/177543

    1996 doi

  15. [23]

    A., Alloin , D., et al

    Clavel , J., Reichert , G. A., Alloin , D., et al. 1991, , 366, 64, 10.1086/169540

    1991 doi

  16. [24]

    D., Rudy , R

    Cohen , R. D., Rudy , R. J., Puetter , R. C., Ake , T. B., & Foltz , C. B. 1986, , 311, 135, 10.1086/164758

    1986 doi

  17. [25]

    1999, , 344, 433

    Collin , S., & Zahn , J.-P. 1999, , 344, 433

    1999

  18. [26]

    Collin , S., & Zahn , J. P. 2008, , 477, 419, 10.1051/0004-6361:20078191

    2008 doi

  19. [27]

    E., McDowell , J

    Collin-Souffrin , S., Dyson , J. E., McDowell , J. C., & Perry , J. J. 1988, , 232, 539, 10.1093/mnras/232.3.539

    1988 doi

  20. [28]

    2016, , 832, 15, 10.3847/0004-637X/832/1/15

    Czerny , B., Du , P., Wang , J.-M., & Karas , V. 2016, , 832, 15, 10.3847/0004-637X/832/1/15

    2016 doi

  21. [29]

    2011, , 525, L8, 10.1051/0004-6361/201016025

    Czerny , B., & Hryniewicz , K. 2011, , 525, L8, 10.1051/0004-6361/201016025

    2011 doi

  22. [30]

    2015, Advances in Space Research, 55, 1806, 10.1016/j.asr.2015.01.004

    Czerny , B., Modzelewska , J., Petrogalli , F., et al. 2015, Advances in Space Research, 55, 1806, 10.1016/j.asr.2015.01.004

    2015 doi

  23. [31]

    2017, , 846, 154, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8810

    Czerny , B., Li , Y.-R., Hryniewicz , K., et al. 2017, , 846, 154, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8810

    2017 doi

  24. [32]

    2018, Space Science Review, 214, 32, 10.1007/s11214-018-0466-9

    Czerny , B., Beaton , R., Bejger , M., et al. 2018, Space Science Review, 214, 32, 10.1007/s11214-018-0466-9

    2018 doi

  25. [33]

    2019, , 880, 46, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2913

    Czerny , B., Olejak , A., Ra owski , M., et al. 2019, , 880, 46, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2913

    2019 doi

  26. [34]

    Czerny , M., & King , A. R. 1989, , 236, 843, 10.1093/mnras/236.4.843

    1989 doi

  27. [35]

    M., Ely , J., et al

    De Rosa , G., Peterson , B. M., Ely , J., et al. 2015, , 806, 128, 10.1088/0004-637X/806/1/128

    2015 doi

  28. [36]

    M., Grier , C

    De Rosa , G., Fausnaugh , M. M., Grier , C. J., et al. 2018, , 866, 133, 10.3847/1538-4357/aadd11

    2018 doi

  29. [37]

    2019, Universe, 5, 108, 10.3390/universe5050108

    Dey , L., Gopakumar , A., Valtonen , M., et al. 2019, Universe, 5, 108, 10.3390/universe5050108

    2019 doi

  30. [38]

    2014, , 782, 45, 10.1088/0004-637X/782/1/45

    Du , P., Hu , C., Lu , K.-X., et al. 2014, , 782, 45, 10.1088/0004-637X/782/1/45

    2014 doi

  31. [39]

    2015, , 806, 22, 10.1088/0004-637X/806/1/22

    ---. 2015, , 806, 22, 10.1088/0004-637X/806/1/22

    2015 doi

  32. [40]

    2016, , 825, 126, 10.3847/0004-637X/825/2/126

    Du , P., Lu , K.-X., Zhang , Z.-X., et al. 2016, , 825, 126, 10.3847/0004-637X/825/2/126

    2016 doi

  33. [41]

    2018 a , , 856, 6, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaae6b

    Du , P., Zhang , Z.-X., Wang , K., et al. 2018 a , , 856, 6, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaae6b

    2018 doi

  34. [42]

    S., Wang , K., et al

    Du , P., Brotherton , M. S., Wang , K., et al. 2018 b , , 869, 142, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaed2c

    2018 doi

  35. [43]

    2006, , 648, L101, 10.1086/508158

    Elitzur , M., & Shlosman , I. 2006, , 648, L101, 10.1086/508158

    2006 doi

  36. [44]

    2017, , 847, 56, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa82b6

    Elvis , M. 2017, , 847, 56, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa82b6

    2017 doi

  37. [45]

    Eracleous , M., & Halpern , J. P. 2003, , 599, 886, 10.1086/379540

    2003 doi

  38. [46]

    2019, , 875, L1, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration , Akiyama , K., Alberdi , A., et al. 2019, , 875, L1, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7

    2019 doi

  39. [47]

    Everett , J. E. 2005, , 631, 689, 10.1086/432678

    2005 doi

  40. [48]

    J., Hu , C., Wang , J.-M., et al

    Ferland , G. J., Hu , C., Wang , J.-M., et al. 2009, , 707, L82, 10.1088/0004-637X/707/1/L82

    2009 doi

  41. [49]

    J., Chatzikos , M., Guzm \'a n , F., et al

    Ferland , G. J., Chatzikos , M., Guzm \'a n , F., et al. 2017, , 53, 385. 1705.10877

    2017 arXiv

  42. [50]

    2015, , 805, 17, 10.1088/0004-637X/805/1/17

    Fukumura , K., Tombesi , F., Kazanas , D., et al. 2015, , 805, 17, 10.1088/0004-637X/805/1/17

    2015 doi

  43. [51]

    Gaskell , C. M. 1983, in Liege International Astrophysical Colloquia, ed. J.-P. Swings , Vol. 24, 473--477

    1983

  44. [52]

    R., Korista , K

    Goad , M. R., Korista , K. T., & Ruff , A. J. 2012, , 426, 3086, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21808.x

    2012

  45. [53]

    R., Korista , K

    Goad , M. R., Korista , K. T., De Rosa , G., et al. 2016, , 824, 11, 10.3847/0004-637X/824/1/11

    2016 doi

  46. [54]

    2018, , 563, 657, 10.1038/s41586-018-0731-9

    Gravity Collaboration , Sturm , E., Dexter , J., et al. 2018, , 563, 657, 10.1038/s41586-018-0731-9

    2018 doi

  47. [55]

    J., Pancoast , A., Barth , A

    Grier , C. J., Pancoast , A., Barth , A. J., et al. 2017 a , , 849, 146, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa901b

    2017 doi

  48. [56]

    J., Peterson , B

    Grier , C. J., Peterson , B. M., Horne , K., et al. 2013, , 764, 47, 10.1088/0004-637X/764/1/47

    2013 doi

  49. [58]

    2017 c , , 851, 21, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa98dc

    ---. 2017 c , , 851, 21, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa98dc

    2017 doi

  50. [59]

    J., Shen , Y., Horne , K., et al

    Grier , C. J., Shen , Y., Horne , K., et al. 2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1904.03199. 1904.03199

    2019 arXiv

  51. [60]

    2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 483, 1808, 10.1093/mnras/sty2900

    Hamann , F., Herbst , H., Paris , I., & Capellupo , D. 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 483, 1808, 10.1093/mnras/sty2900

    2019 doi

  52. [61]

    C., et al

    Hu , C., Wang , J.-M., Ho , L. C., et al. 2008, , 687, 78, 10.1086/591838

    2008 doi

  53. [62]

    2019, , 876, 102, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab16ef

    Huang , Y.-K., Hu , C., Zhao , Y.-L., et al. 2019, , 876, 102, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab16ef

    2019 doi

  54. [63]

    Ili \'c , D., & Popovi \'c , L. C . 2014, in Journal of Physics Conference Series, Vol. 548, 012002

    2014

  55. [64]

    C., Ciroi , S., & Rafanelli , P

    Ilic , D., Popovic , L. C., Ciroi , S., & Rafanelli , P. 2008, in Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica Conference Series, Vol. 32, 102--102

    2008

  56. [65]

    I., Popovi \'c , L

    Ili \'c , D., Shapovalova , A. I., Popovi \'c , L. C ., et al. 2017, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 4, 12, 10.3389/fspas.2017.00012

    2017

  57. [66]

    S., Netzer , H., et al

    Kaspi , S., Smith , P. S., Netzer , H., et al. 2000, , 533, 631, 10.1086/308704

    2000 doi

  58. [67]

    2019, , 487, 4057, 10.1093/mnras/stz1552

    Katebi , R., Chornock , R., Berger , E., et al. 2019, , 487, 4057, 10.1093/mnras/stz1552

    2019 doi

  59. [68]

    K., Everett , J

    Keating , S. K., Everett , J. E., Gallagher , S. C., & Deo , R. P. 2012, , 749, 32, 10.1088/0004-637X/749/1/32

    2012 doi

  60. [69]

    C., Bechtold , J., & Siemiginowska , A

    Kelly , B. C., Bechtold , J., & Siemiginowska , A. 2009, , 698, 895, 10.1088/0004-637X/698/1/895

    2009 doi

  61. [70]

    V., & Merritt , D

    Kharb , P., Lal , D. V., & Merritt , D. 2017, Nature Astronomy, 1, 727, 10.1038/s41550-017-0256-4

    2017 doi

  62. [71]

    L., Martini , P., Davis , T

    King , A. L., Martini , P., Davis , T. M., et al. 2015, , 453, 1701, 10.1093/mnras/stv1718

    2015 doi

  63. [72]

    2013, , 549, A100, 10.1051/0004-6361/201219411

    Kollatschny , W., & Zetzl , M. 2013, , 549, A100, 10.1051/0004-6361/201219411

    2013 doi

  64. [73]

    A., De Rosa , G., Ely , J., et al

    Kriss , G. A., De Rosa , G., Ely , J., et al. 2019, , 881, 153, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3049

    2019 doi

  65. [74]

    H., McKee , C

    Krolik , J. H., McKee , C. F., & Tarter , C. B. 1981, , 249, 422, 10.1086/159303

    1981 doi

  66. [75]

    2010, , 710, 360, 10.1088/0004-637X/710/1/360

    Krongold , Y., Elvis , M., Andrade-Velazquez , M., et al. 2010, , 710, 360, 10.1088/0004-637X/710/1/360

    2010 doi

  67. [76]

    M., Cales , S., Moran , E

    LaMassa , S. M., Cales , S., Moran , E. C., et al. 2015, , 800, 144, 10.1088/0004-637X/800/2/144

    2015 doi

  68. [77]

    C., et al

    Li , Y.-R., Wang , J.-M., Ho , L. C., et al. 2016, , 822, 4, 10.3847/0004-637X/822/1/4

    2016 doi

  69. [78]

    2018, , 869, 137, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaee6b

    Li , Y.-R., Songsheng , Y.-Y., Qiu , J., et al. 2018, , 869, 137, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaee6b

    2018 doi

  70. [79]

    2019, , 241, 33, 10.3847/1538-4365/ab0ec5

    Li , Y.-R., Wang , J.-M., Zhang , Z.-X., et al. 2019, , 241, 33, 10.3847/1538-4365/ab0ec5

    2019 doi

  71. [80]

    2018, , 865, 56, 10.3847/1538-4357/aada45

    Lira , P., Kaspi , S., Netzer , H., et al. 2018, , 865, 56, 10.3847/1538-4357/aada45

    2018 doi

  72. [81]

    2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1906.08315

    Liu , T., Gezari , S., Ayers , M., et al. 2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1906.08315. 1906.08315

    2019 arXiv

  73. [82]

    Liutyi , V. M. 1977, Sov. Astr., 21, 655

    1977

  74. [83]

    2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1903.09687

    Loli Mart \' nez-Aldama , M., Czerny , B., Kawka , D., et al. 2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1903.09687. 1903.09687

    2019 arXiv

  75. [84]

    2019, , 628, L4, 10.1051/0004-6361/201936223

    Lusso , E., Piedipalumbo , E., Risaliti , G., et al. 2019, , 628, L4, 10.1051/0004-6361/201936223

    2019 doi

  76. [85]

    L., Green , P

    MacLeod , C. L., Green , P. J., Anderson , S. F., et al. 2019, , 874, 8, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab05e2

    2019 doi

  77. [86]

    A., Dultzin , D., et al

    Marziani , P., Negrete , C. A., Dultzin , D., et al. 2017, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 4, 16, 10.3389/fspas.2017.00016

    2017

  78. [87]

    W., et al

    Marziani , P., Dultzin , D., Sulentic , J. W., et al. 2018, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 5, 6, 10.3389/fspas.2018.00006

    2018

  79. [88]

    P., O'Leary , R., & Madigan , A.-M

    McCourt , M., Oh , S. P., O'Leary , R., & Madigan , A.-M. 2018, , 473, 5407, 10.1093/mnras/stx2687

    2018 doi

  80. [89]

    E., Husemann , B., Croom , S

    McElroy , R. E., Husemann , B., Croom , S. M., et al. 2016, , 593, L8, 10.1051/0004-6361/201629102

    2016 doi

  81. [90]

    E., Lira , P., Netzer , H., Trakhtenbrot , B., & Capellupo , D

    Mej \' a-Restrepo , J. E., Lira , P., Netzer , H., Trakhtenbrot , B., & Capellupo , D. M. 2018, Nature Astronomy, 2, 63, 10.1038/s41550-017-0305-z

    2018 doi

  82. [91]

    2019, , 2149, 10.1093/mnras/stz2225

    Mizumoto , M., Done , C., Tomaru , R., & Edwards , I. 2019, , 2149, 10.1093/mnras/stz2225

    2019 doi

  83. [92]

    A., & Korista , K

    Moe , M., Arav , N., Bautista , M. A., & Korista , K. T. 2009, The Astrophysical Journal, 706, 525, 10.1088/0004-637X/706/1/525

    2009 doi

  84. [93]

    1997, , 474, 91, 10.1086/303443

    Murray , N., & Chiang , J. 1997, , 474, 91, 10.1086/303443

    1997 doi

  85. [94]

    A., & Voit , G

    Murray , N., Chiang , J., Grossman , S. A., & Voit , G. M. 1995, , 451, 498, 10.1086/176238

    1995 doi

  86. [95]

    1993, , 404, L51, 10.1086/186741

    Netzer , H., & Laor , A. 1993, , 404, L51, 10.1086/186741

    1993 doi

  87. [96]

    2018, , 480, 3898, 10.1093/mnras/sty2032

    Noda , H., & Done , C. 2018, , 480, 3898, 10.1093/mnras/sty2032

    2018 doi

  88. [97]

    L., Winkler , H., Tsygankov , S

    Oknyansky , V. L., Winkler , H., Tsygankov , S. S., et al. 2019, , 483, 558, 10.1093/mnras/sty3133

    2019 doi

  89. [98]

    Osterbrock , D. E. 1978, Physica Scripta, 17, 285, 10.1088/0031-8949/17/3/024

    1978 doi

  90. [99]

    J., Horne , K., et al

    Pancoast , A., Barth , A. J., Horne , K., et al. 2018, , 856, 108, 10.3847/1538-4357/aab3c6

    2018 doi

  91. [100]

    2019, , 871, 108, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf806

    Pancoast , A., Skielboe , A., Pei , L., et al. 2019, , 871, 108, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf806

    2019 doi

  92. [101]

    P., et al

    Panda , S., Czerny , B., Adhikari , T. P., et al. 2018, , 866, 115, 10.3847/1538-4357/aae209

    2018 doi

  93. [102]

    2019, , 875, 133, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab11cb

    Panda , S., Czerny , B., Done , C., & Kubota , A. 2019, , 875, 133, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab11cb

    2019 doi

  94. [103]

    Peterson , B. M. 2006, The Broad-Line Region in Active Galactic Nuclei , ed. D. Alloin , Vol. 693, 77

    2006

  95. [104]

    M., Wanders , I., Horne , K., et al

    Peterson , B. M., Wanders , I., Horne , K., et al. 1998, , 110, 660, 10.1086/316177

    1998 doi

  96. [105]

    M., Ferrarese , L., Gilbert , K

    Peterson , B. M., Ferrarese , L., Gilbert , K. M., et al. 2004, , 613, 682, 10.1086/423269

    2004 doi

  97. [106]

    Popovi \'c , L. C . 2012, New Astronomy Rev., 56, 74, 10.1016/j.newar.2011.11.001

    2012 doi

  98. [107]

    2007, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Proga , D. 2007, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 373, The Central Engine of Active Galactic Nuclei, ed. L. C. Ho & J. W. Wang , 267

    2007

  99. [108]

    o llig , M., Szczerba , R., Ossenkopf , V., & Gl \

    R \"o llig , M., Szczerba , R., Ossenkopf , V., & Gl \"u ck , C. 2013, , 549, A85, 10.1051/0004-6361/201118190

    2013 doi

  100. [109]

    Seyfert , C. K. 1943, , 97, 28, 10.1086/144488

    1943 doi

  101. [110]

    I., Popovi \'c , L

    Shapovalova , A. I., Popovi \'c , L. C ., Burenkov , A. N., et al. 2010 a , , 509, A106, 10.1051/0004-6361/200912311

    2010 doi

  102. [111]

    I., Burenkov , A

    Shapovalova , A. I., Burenkov , A. N., Carrasco , L., et al. 2001, , 376, 775, 10.1051/0004-6361:20011011

    2001 doi

  103. [112]

    I., Doroshenko , V

    Shapovalova , A. I., Doroshenko , V. T., Bochkarev , N. G., et al. 2004, , 422, 925, 10.1051/0004-6361:20035652

    2004 doi

  104. [113]

    I., Popovi \'c , L

    Shapovalova , A. I., Popovi \'c , L. C ., Burenkov , A. N., et al. 2010 b , , 517, A42, 10.1051/0004-6361/201014118

    2010 doi

  105. [114]

    2012, , 202, 10, 10.1088/0067-0049/202/1/10

    ---. 2012, , 202, 10, 10.1088/0067-0049/202/1/10

    2012 doi

  106. [115]

    2013, , 559, A10, 10.1051/0004-6361/201321781

    ---. 2013, , 559, A10, 10.1051/0004-6361/201321781

    2013 doi

  107. [116]

    I., Popovi \'c , L

    Shapovalova , A. I., Popovi \'c , L. C ., Chavushyan , V. H., et al. 2016, , 222, 25, 10.3847/0067-0049/222/2/25

    2016 doi

  108. [117]

    2017, , 466, 4759, 10.1093/mnras/stx025

    ---. 2017, , 466, 4759, 10.1093/mnras/stx025

    2017 doi

  109. [118]

    I., Popovi \'c , , L

    Shapovalova , A. I., Popovi \'c , , L. C ., et al. 2019, , 485, 4790, 10.1093/mnras/stz692

    2019 doi

  110. [119]

    2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1905.02904

    Sheng , Z., Wang , T., Jiang , N., et al. 2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1905.02904. 1905.02904

    2019 arXiv

  111. [120]

    2017, The Astrophysical Journal, 835, 24, 10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/24

    Shin , J., Nagao , T., & Woo , J.-H. 2017, The Astrophysical Journal, 835, 24, 10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/24

    2017 doi

  112. [121]

    Shlosman , I., Frank , J., & Begelman , M. C. 1989, , 338, 45, 10.1038/338045a0

    1989 doi

  113. [122]

    2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1904.06767

    \'S niegowska , M., & Czerny , B. 2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1904.06767. 1904.06767

    2019 arXiv

  114. [123]

    2019, , 881, 140, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2e00

    Songsheng , Y.-Y., Wang , J.-M., Li , Y.-R., & Du , P. 2019, , 881, 140, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2e00

    2019 doi

  115. [124]

    A., & Wilson , A

    Storchi-Bergmann , T., Baldwin , J. A., & Wilson , A. S. 1993, , 410, L11, 10.1086/186867

    1993 doi

  116. [125]

    1995, , 443, 617, 10.1086/175553

    Storchi-Bergmann , T., Eracleous , M., Livio , M., et al. 1995, , 443, 617, 10.1086/175553

    1995 doi

  117. [126]

    W., Marziani , P., Zamanov , R., et al

    Sulentic , J. W., Marziani , P., Zamanov , R., et al. 2002, , 566, L71, 10.1086/339594

    2002 doi

  118. [127]

    W., Zwitter , T., Marziani , P., & Dultzin-Hacyan , D

    Sulentic , J. W., Zwitter , T., Marziani , P., & Dultzin-Hacyan , D. 2000, , 536, L5, 10.1086/312717

    2000 doi

  119. [128]

    N., et al

    Tombesi , F., Cappi , M., Reeves , J. N., et al. 2010, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 521, A57, 10.1051/0004-6361/200913440

    2010 doi

  120. [129]

    L., et al

    Trakhtenbrot , B., Arcavi , I., MacLeod , C. L., et al. 2019 a , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1903.11084. 1903.11084

    2019 arXiv

  121. [130]

    2019 b , Nature Astronomy, 3, 242, 10.1038/s41550-018-0661-3

    Trakhtenbrot , B., Arcavi , I., Ricci , C., et al. 2019 b , Nature Astronomy, 3, 242, 10.1038/s41550-018-0661-3

    2019 doi

  122. [131]

    2000, , 531, 744, 10.1086/308494

    Valtaoja , E., Ter \"a sranta , H., Tornikoski , M., et al. 2000, , 531, 744, 10.1086/308494

    2000 doi

  123. [132]

    1991, , 377, 89, 10.1086/170338

    Veilleux , S., & Zheng , W. 1991, , 377, 89, 10.1086/170338

    1991 doi

  124. [133]

    P., & V \'e ron , P

    V \'e ron-Cetty , M. P., & V \'e ron , P. 2001, , 374, 92, 10.1051/0004-6361:20010718

    2001 doi

  125. [134]

    2018, , 617, A81, 10.1051/0004-6361/201732335

    Vietri , G., Piconcelli , E., Bischetti , M., et al. 2018, , 617, A81, 10.1051/0004-6361/201732335

    2018 doi

  126. [135]

    M., & Malkan , M

    Wandel , A., Peterson , B. M., & Malkan , M. A. 1999, , 526, 579, 10.1086/308017

    1999 doi

  127. [136]

    A., et al

    Wang , J.-M., Du , P., Baldwin , J. A., et al. 2012, , 746, 137, 10.1088/0004-637X/746/2/137

    2012 doi

  128. [137]

    S., et al

    Wang , J.-M., Du , P., Brotherton , M. S., et al. 2017, Nature Astronomy, 1, 775, 10.1038/s41550-017-0264-4

    2017 doi

  129. [138]

    Wang , J.-M., Qiu , J., Du , P., & Ho , L. C. 2014, , 797, 65, 10.1088/0004-637X/797/1/65

    2014 doi

  130. [139]

    2018, , 862, 171, 10.3847/1538-4357/aacdfa

    Wang , J.-M., Songsheng , Y.-Y., Li , Y.-R., & Yu , Z. 2018, , 862, 171, 10.3847/1538-4357/aacdfa

    2018 doi

  131. [140]

    2011, , 739, 3, 10.1088/0004-637X/739/1/3

    Wang , J.-M., Ge , J.-Q., Hu , C., et al. 2011, , 739, 3, 10.1088/0004-637X/739/1/3

    2011 doi

  132. [141]

    2016, , 827, 53, 10.3847/0004-637X/827/1/53

    Waters , T., Kashi , A., Proga , D., et al. 2016, , 827, 53, 10.3847/0004-637X/827/1/53

    2016 doi

  133. [142]

    J., Czerny , B., & Zycki , P

    Witt , H. J., Czerny , B., & Zycki , P. T. 1997, , 286, 848, 10.1093/mnras/286.4.848

    1997 doi

  134. [143]

    H., Son , D., Gallo , E., et al

    Woo , J. H., Son , D., Gallo , E., et al. 2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1907.00771. 1907.00771

    2019 arXiv

  135. [144]

    2014, Ann

    Yuan , F., & Narayan , R. 2014, Ann. Rev. Astr. and Astrophys., 52, 529, 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-141003

    2014 doi

  136. [145]

    W., Marziani , P., & Dultzin , D

    Zamfir , S., Sulentic , J. W., Marziani , P., & Dultzin , D. 2010, , 403, 1759, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16236.x

    2010

  137. [146]

    S., & Peterson , B

    Zu , Y., Kochanek , C. S., & Peterson , B. M. 2011, , 735, 80, 10.1088/0004-637X/735/2/80

    2011 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.