The conformal limit for bimerons in easy-plane chiral magnets

Bin Deng; Radu Ignat; Xavier Lamy

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 23 references

The conformal limit for bimerons in easy-plane chiral magnets

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read For small easy-plane anisotropy, degree-minus-one bimeron minimizers exist and are H^1-close to specific Möbius maps concentrated at scale 1/|ln(σ²)|.

desk verdict Solid, honest paper: the first rigorous description of bimeron minimizers in the conformal limit, with a complete proof that leans on a legitimate published rigidity theorem; minor typos only. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.11955 v1 pith:DDRQUSIO submitted 2025-06-13 math.AP

Bin Deng , Radu Ignat , Xavier Lamy This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.AP MSC 35Q5158E2049J45

keywords bimeronseasy-planechiralmagnetsDzyaloshinskii-MoriyainteractionconformallimitMöbiusmapstopologicaldegreeenergyasymptoticsconcentration-compactness

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies the energy $$E_\$\sigma$(m)=\int_{\mathbb $R^{2}$}\left(\tfrac12|\nabla m|^2+\$sigma^{2}$ m\cdot\nabla\times m+\$sigma^{2}$ $m_3^{2}$\right)dx$$ for maps $m:\mathbb R^2\to S^2$ with topological degree $\pm1$, the model for bimerons in thin ferromagnetic films with a chiral interaction and easy-plane anisotropy. It proves that for all sufficiently small $\sigma$ the infimum over degree $-1$ maps is attained, and that minimizers are, up to translation and corotation, small $H^1$-perturbations of a specific Möbius map concentrated at scale $1/|\ln(\sigma^2)|$. The minimum energy is $4\pi$ minus a leading correction of order $\sigma^2/\ln(1/\sigma^2)$, with the coefficient fixed by the balance of anisotropy and chiral terms. This turns the heuristic conformal limit for bimerons into a quantitative statement, and it shows that the easy-plane model requires genuinely different arguments than the easier skyrmion case.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is a quantitative rigidity theorem for degree $-1$ maps from $\mathbb R^2$ to $S^2$ with finite Dirichlet energy: every such map is $H^1$-close to some Möbius map, and the $H^1$ distance is controlled by the excess Dirichlet energy over the harmonic-map minimum. Around this, the paper builds a new parametrization of the Möbius group, $m_{\{z_0,\rho,\phi,\alpha,\beta\}}=T_{z_0}D_\rho R_\phi m_{[\alpha,\beta]}$, that keeps track of corotations explicitly and is adapted to the bimeron profile $\Psi_\sigma$. The lower-bound proof combines this rigidity with lower bounds on the anisotropy $\int m_3^2$ and the chiral term, obtained via Fourier–Bessel identities and Moser–Trudinger estimates; the upper bound comes from truncating Möbius maps at one scale; and existence is completed by concentration-compactness with a new argument ruling out vanishing.

What would settle it

Numerically minimize $E_\sigma$ on a disk of radius $R\gg1/\sigma$ with degree-one boundary data; if the energy gap from $4\pi$ is not of size $\pi\sigma^2/\ln(1/\sigma^2)$ or the concentration scale does not approach $1/|\ln\sigma^2|$, the theorem's quantitative description is wrong. Alternatively, find any map in $W_{-1}$ whose energy falls below the stated minimum by more than the $O(\sigma^2/\ln^2(1/\sigma^2))$ remainder.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that for every $0<\sigma\le\sigma_0$ the infimum of $E_\sigma$ over maps of degree $-1$ is attained, and that any minimizer $m_\sigma$ satisfies $$\min E_\$\sigma$=4\pi-\frac{2\pi\$sigma^{2}$}{\ln((1/\$sigma^{2}$)\$ln^{2}$(1/\$sigma^{2}$))}+O\left(\frac{\$sigma^{2}$}{\$ln^{2}$(1/\$sigma^{2}$)}\right).$$ Up to a translation and a corotation, $m_\sigma$ is $H^1$-close to the Möbius map $\Psi_\sigma(z)=\Phi(w_*(e^{-i\alpha_\sigma}z/\rho_\sigma))$ with $w_*(z)=i(z-1)/(z+1)$, scale $\rho_\sigma=(1+o(1))/\ln(1/\sigma^2)$, and $\int_{\mathbb R^2}|\nabla(m_\sigma-\Psi_\sigma)|^2\,dx\le C\sigma^2/\ln(1/\sigma)$. These are the bimerons: topological solitons whose conformal limit is the harmonic-map minimum $D(m)=4\pi$, with the anisotropy and chiral terms selecting the logarithmically localized profile.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the rigidity theorem used as a black box: every finite-energy degree-minus-one map is $H^1$-close to some Möbius map, with the distance controlled by how much its Dirichlet energy exceeds the harmonic-map minimum $8\pi$; if this fails for maps that only have finite easy-plane anisotropy and possibly oscillating far fields, the lower bound, the scale identification, and the existence proof all collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For $0<\sigma\le\sigma_0$, energy minimizers with degree $-1$ exist, and by reflection the same holds for degree $+1$.
The minimal energy is pinned to $4\pi - 2\pi\sigma^2/\ln((1/\sigma^2)\ln^2(1/\sigma^2)) + O(\sigma^2/\ln^2(1/\sigma^2))$, so the leading correction depends only logarithmically on the anisotropy strength.
Every minimizer is localized at scale $\rho_\sigma \sim 1/|\ln\sigma^2|$ and lies within $O(\sigma^2/\ln(1/\sigma))$ of the explicit Möbius profile in $H^1$, modulo the three continuous symmetries.
The minimizers satisfy the Pohozaev identity $H(m_\sigma)=-2A(m_\sigma)$, so the chiral and anisotropy energies have equal magnitude, both of order $1/\ln(1/\sigma^2)$.
There are no axisymmetric bimerons: the selected Möbius orbit is three-dimensional, in contrast to the two-dimensional orbit in the easy-axis skyrmion case.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same leading-order scale and energy should survive for any choice of coefficients with $b^2\ll ac$, since the scaling identities reduce general coefficients to this regime; experiments on films with weak chiral coupling should see bimeron cores of radius $\sim 1/|\ln\sigma^2|$.
The $H^1$ closeness result permits slowly decaying tails in $m_3$ and does not control $L^\infty$ errors, so physical bimeron signatures may be more diffuse than the core scale suggests.
A rigidity theorem for higher-degree conformal maps would likely carry the same expansion to bimeron clusters with $|Q|>1$, giving a prediction for multi-bimeron energy sums.
The logarithmic scale emerges from the logarithmic divergence of the easy-plane anisotropy on Möbius profiles, so any interaction with a similarly logarithmic tail should enter the same balance at leading order.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Read the paper fully. The main theorem is new and the proof is put together carefully. The easy-plane case is genuinely different from the skyrmion analysis: no axisymmetric ansatz, connected far-field set, less coercive DMI control. The new Mobius parametrization in Lemma 2.1 is clearly motivated, and the DMI computation in Section 3 is self-contained. The upper-bound competitor (Section 4) and the lower-bound chain (Section 5) give the two-term expansion, and the near-minimizer characterization in Proposition 5.4 is the right tool for the existence proof in Section 6. I think the argument holds up.

The obvious load-bearing piece is the rigidity theorem of [4] quoted as (5.1). It is used black-box in Lemmas 5.1 and 5.3 and then everywhere downstream. But it is a published theorem with two independent proofs [10,23], and the application to the class W is justified by the appendix. I don't see a circularity or a mismatch. The paper is upfront about this reliance.

Soft spots are minor. The displayed identity (6.1) is missing the |\nabla m_3|^2 terms; the inequality in the proof of Lemma 5.3 appears to lose a factor L^{-2} in the first term. Both are typos apparent from the surrounding text and don't affect the argument. The upper-bound construction uses a simple cut-off and the constant C1 is not optimal, but Remark 4.2 correctly notes that the main-order expansion doesn't care. The comparison with skyrmions in Section 1.5 is useful and honest; it makes clear which steps are new and which are borrowed.

One thing that is not a flaw but worth noting: the theorem is an asymptotic description, not a symmetry result. The orbit of Mobius maps is identified up to translation and corotation, and the scale rho_sigma is pinned down, but the paper doesn't claim uniqueness of the minimizing configuration beyond that. That's fine given the invariances.

Who gets value: anyone working on variational problems for magnetic textures, especially the skyrmion/bimeron literature. The paper should go to a serious referee; it's a complete proof of a natural result that was missing. I'd bring it to a reading group and would cite it.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the variational problem for bimerons in easy-plane chiral magnets, described by the energy Eσ on maps m: R² → S² of topological degree -1. The main result, Theorem 1.3, asserts that for small σ the infimum is attained and satisfies min Eσ = 4π − 2πσ²/ln((1/σ²)ln²(1/σ²)) + O(σ²/ln²σ), and that every minimizer is H¹-close, at scale ~1/|ln σ²|, to a specific four-parameter family of Möbius maps. The proof adapts the strategy of Bernand-Mantel–Muratov–Simon for skyrmions, with a new parametrization of the Möbius group, a DMI calculation, a lower-bound chain using the rigidity estimate of [4], an explicit competitor construction, and a concentration-compactness existence proof.

Significance. If the announced result is correct, it is a substantial contribution to the calculus of variations for topological solitons and to the theory of magnetic bimerons. The paper gives a fully explicit energy expansion with no fitted parameters, a complete lower-bound/upper-bound matching, and a detailed characterization of near-minimizers. The main external input, the quantitative rigidity estimate (5.1), is a published theorem with independent proofs, and the paper correctly checks that its setting covers the class W. The adaptations to the less coercive easy-plane anisotropy, in particular the new DMI lower bound and the vanishing argument in the existence proof, are nontrivial and are presented with enough detail to be verifiable.

major comments (1)

[§5.3, proof of Proposition 5.4] The derivation of the bound ρ ≤ 8/ln(1/σ) in (5.17) is not correct as written. The text combines (5.16) with the inequality 4πσ²ρ ≤ 2πσ²ρ² + 4πσ² and claims that this implies 2πσ²ρ² ln L ≤ 8πσ²; however, the latter inequality yields only ρ² ≤ O(1/ln L), hence ρ ≤ O(1/√ln(1/σ)), not the stated ρ ≤ O(1/ln(1/σ)). The desired O(1/ln(1/σ)) bound does follow without that substitution, by solving the quadratic inequality (4π ln L − C)ρ² ≤ 4πρ + C√σ obtained directly from (5.16) together with Eσ(m) ≤ 4π. This repair is needed because (5.17) is used in (5.18) to absorb the term Cσ²ρ² into Cσ²/ln²σ, which is essential for the sharp lower bound (5.11).

minor comments (5)

[§5.2, proof of Lemma 5.3] In the displayed estimate after the Cauchy–Schwarz step, the term 8π/L should carry a factor A(m), and the term cMT c∗/L should be cMT c∗/L²; as written the inequality is not dimensionally consistent, although the final statement of the lemma remains correct once A(m) is bounded as in (5.14).
[§6, equation (6.1)] The displayed identity for eσ(m) omits the terms 1/2|∇m3|²; the correct identity includes these nonnegative terms, and the subsequent bounds remain valid because the omitted terms only strengthen the inequality.
[§1.4 and §5.1] The rigidity estimate (5.1) uses the notation H^1_c(R²;S²), which is not defined in the paper; it should be identified explicitly with the space H(R²;S²) of (1.12) or with H^1(S²;S²) via stereographic projection.
[§1.5] The example m(x) = Φ(e^{iφ(x)}w∗(x)) with φ(x) = ln(1+ln(1+|x|²)) should explicitly state that this map belongs to W−1 and that its average at infinity does not converge, to justify the claim that ∞ is not a Lebesgue point.
[Theorem 1.3] The estimate |ln(1/σ²)ρσ − 1| + |ασ| ≤ C/√ln(1/σ) is equivalent to the bounds in Proposition 5.4, but the factor ln(1/σ²) = 2ln(1/σ) may obscure the comparison; consider writing |2ln(1/σ)ρσ − 1| for clarity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the energy expansion is derived from explicit competitors and lower bounds, and the load-bearing rigidity theorem is an external published result with independent proofs.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain is self-contained apart from its reliance on the quantitative rigidity theorem of Bernand-Mantel, Muratov and Simon (cited as [4, Theorem 2.4] and quoted in (5.1)), which is an external, peer-reviewed result with alternative proofs in [10,23]. No parameter appearing in Theorem 1.3 is fitted to the target result: the upper bound in §4 is built from explicit truncated Möbius competitors with a free cutoff parameter L, and the final leading constant survives minimization in L and ρ; the lower bound in §5 uses the rigidity estimate only to localize near the Möbius group and then derives energy bounds in terms of the free parameters (ρ, α, β) and the excess scale L. The optimal scale ρ ~ 1/|ln σ²| emerges from the competition between anisotropy, DMI and exchange terms, not from an input assumption carrying the conclusion. The few self-citations (e.g., [11], [12]) are surveys or tangential context and are not load-bearing. The paper repeatedly adapts, rather than assumes, the skyrmion strategy of [4], and it explicitly notes in Remark 4.2 that the cutoff constant does not affect the main order, further confirming that the leading asymptotics are not construction-dependent. No equation is equivalent to the theorem by definition, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The proof is therefore free of circularity, and the score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim is an asymptotics theorem, not a fitting exercise: it has no data-fitted parameters. The only free quantities are optimization variables (the truncation scale L and concentration scale ρ) that are minimized over, not fitted to the result. The paper rests on three external mathematical inputs: the rigidity estimate of [4] for degree ±1 maps, the Moser-Trudinger inequality on S2, and the concentration-compactness dichotomy construction of Lions/[6]. No new entities are postulated. The novelty resides in new lower-bound techniques and a Möbius parametrization adapted to bimeron symmetry.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Stability estimate for degree ±1 maps from R2 to S2 ([4, Theorem 2.4], quoted as (5.1)): for any degree -1 map m with finite Dirichlet energy there is a Möbius map Ψ with ∫|∇(m-Ψ)|² ≤ c_* (∫|∇m|² - 8π).
Used as a black box throughout §5 and §6; the paper does not reproduce the proof and relies on the published theorem with alternative proofs in [10] and [23].
standard math Moser-Trudinger inequality on S2 [19].
Used in Lemma 5.1 (equations (5.4), (5.9)) to bound the L2 norm of the perturbation v3; classical analytic tool, not specific to magnetism.
domain assumption Lions' concentration-compactness alternative and the splitting map construction of [6, Lemma 8].
Used in Step 3 of Proposition 6.1 to exclude vanishing and dichotomy; the paper sketches the construction but cites [17] and [6] for full details.
standard math Bessel function asymptotics for K1 and the Fourier transform of stereographic projection components ([1, §9.6.11], [4, Lemma A.5]).
Used in the Fourier-based lower bound of §5.1; the asymptotics are classical, and the Fourier identity is taken from [4].

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The conformal limit for bimerons in easy-plane chiral magnets." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DDRQUSIO

@misc{pith2026250611955,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The conformal limit for bimerons in easy-plane chiral magnets},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DDRQUSIO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.11955}
}

abstract

We study minimizers $\boldsymbol{m}\colon \mathbb R^2\to\mathbb S^2$ of the energy functional \begin{align*} E_\sigma(\boldsymbol{m}) = \int_{\mathbb R^2} \bigg(\frac 12 |\nabla\boldsymbol{m}|^2 +\sigma^2 \boldsymbol{ m} \cdot \nabla \times\boldsymbol{m} +\sigma^2 m_3^2 \bigg)\, dx\,, \end{align*} for $0<\sigma\ll 1$, with prescribed topological degree \begin{align*} Q(\boldsymbol{m})=\frac{1}{4\pi} \int_{\mathbb R^2}\boldsymbol{m} \cdot \partial_1 \boldsymbol{m}\times\partial_2\boldsymbol{m}\, dx =\pm 1\,. \end{align*} This model arises in thin ferromagnetic films with Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction and easy-plane anisotropy, where these minimizers represent bimeron configurations. We prove their existence, and describe them precisely as perturbations of specific M\"obius maps: we establish in particular that they are localized at scale of order $1/|\ln(\sigma^2)|$. The proof follows a strategy introduced by Bernand-Mantel, Muratov and Simon (Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 2021) for a similar model with easy-axis anisotropy, but requires several adaptations to deal with the less coercive easy-plane anisotropy and different symmetry properties.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

23 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages

[4]

B., AND SIMON , T

B ERNAND -MANTEL , A., M URATOV, C. B., AND SIMON , T. M. A quantitative description of skyrmions in ultrathin ferromagnetic films 38 BIN DENG, RADU IGNAT, AND XA VIER LAMY and rigidity of degree ±1 harmonic maps from R2 to S2. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 239, 1 (2021), 219–299

work page 2021
[1]

A BRAMOWITZ , M., AND STEGUN , I. A. Handbook of mathemat- ical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables. 10th printing, with corrections. National Bureau of Standards. A Wiley- Interscience Publication. New York etc.: John Wiley & Sons (1972), 1972

work page 1972
[2]

Meron con- figurations in easy-plane chiral magnets

B ACHMANN , D., L IANERIS , M., AND KOMINEAS , S. Meron con- figurations in easy-plane chiral magnets. Phys. Rev. B 108 (Jul 2023), 014402

work page 2023
[3]

Bimeron configuration in thin chiral ferromagnetic films with large easy-plane anisotropy

B ACHO , G., AND MELCHER , C. Bimeron configuration in thin chiral ferromagnetic films with large easy-plane anisotropy. In preparation

work page
[5]

Degree theory of BMO

B R ´EZIS , H., AND NIRENBERG , L. Degree theory of BMO. I: Com- pact manifolds without boundaries. Sel. Math., New Ser. 1, 2 (1995), 197–263

work page 1995
[6]

Compactness results for static and dynamic chiral skyrmions near the conformal limit

D ¨ORING , L., AND MELCHER , C. Compactness results for static and dynamic chiral skyrmions near the conformal limit. Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. 56, 3 (2017), 30. Id/No 60

work page 2017
[7]

E STEBAN , M. J. A direct variational approach to Skyrme’s model for meson fields. Commun. Math. Phys. 105 (1986), 571–591

work page 1986
[8]

G ¨OBEL , B., M OOK , A., H ENK , J., M ERTIG , I., AND TRETIAKOV , O. A. Magnetic bimerons as skyrmion analogues in in-plane magnets. Phys. Rev. B 99, 6 (2019), 060407

work page 2019

Show all 23 references

[9]

B., AND LIN, F

H ANG , F. B., AND LIN, F. H. Static theory for planar ferromagnets and antiferromagnets. Acta Math. Sin. (Engl. Ser.) 17, 4 (2001), 541– 580

2001
[10]

A note on a rigidity estimate for degree ±1 conformal maps on S2

H IRSCH , J., AND ZEMAS , K. A note on a rigidity estimate for degree ±1 conformal maps on S2. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 54, 1 (2022), 256– 263

2022
[11]

Singularities of divergence-free vector fields with values into S1 or S2

I GNAT, R. Singularities of divergence-free vector fields with values into S1 or S2. Applications to micromagnetics. Confluentes Math. 4, 3 (2012), 1230001, 80

2012
[12]

Renormalised energy between boundary vortices in thin-film micromagnetics with Dzyaloshinskii- Moriya interaction

I GNAT, R., AND L’OFFICIAL , F. Renormalised energy between boundary vortices in thin-film micromagnetics with Dzyaloshinskii- Moriya interaction. Nonlinear Anal. 250 (2025), Paper No. 113622, 26

2025
[13]

Removable sets for Sobolev spaces

K OSKELA , P. Removable sets for Sobolev spaces. Ark. Mat. 37 , 2 (1999), 291–304

1999
[14]

Applications harmoniques de surfaces riemanniennes

L EMAIRE , L. Applications harmoniques de surfaces riemanniennes. J. Differ. Geom. 13(1978), 51–78

1978
[15]

Stability of axisymmetric chiral skyrmions

L I, X., AND MELCHER , C. Stability of axisymmetric chiral skyrmions. J. Funct. Anal. 275, 10 (2018), 2817–2844

2018
[16]

Existence of two-dimensional Skyrmions via the concentration-compactness method

L IN, F., AND YANG , Y. Existence of two-dimensional Skyrmions via the concentration-compactness method. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 57, 10 (2004), 1332–1351

2004
[17]

The concentration-compactness principle in the calculus of variations

L IONS , P.-L. The concentration-compactness principle in the calculus of variations. The locally compact case. I. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´e, Anal. Non Lin´eaire 1 (1984), 109–145

1984
[18]

Chiral skyrmions in the plane

M ELCHER , C. Chiral skyrmions in the plane. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., Ser. A, Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 470, 2172 (2014), 17. Id/No 20140394

2014
[19]

A sharp form of an inequality by Trudinger

M OSER , J. A sharp form of an inequality by Trudinger. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 20 (1971), 1077–1092. THE CONFORMAL LIMIT FOR BIMERONS 39

1971
[20]

R ESHETNYAK , Y. G. Stability theorems in geometry and analysis , rev. and updated transl. ed., vol. 304 ofMath. Appl., Dordr.Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994

1994
[21]

Sharp quantitative rigidity results for maps from S2 to S2 of general degree

R UPFLIN , M. Sharp quantitative rigidity results for maps from S2 to S2 of general degree. arXiv:2305.17045 (2023)

2023 arXiv
[22]

Variational methods

S TRUWE , M. Variational methods. Applications to nonlinear partial differential equations and Hamiltonian systems., 4th ed. ed., vol. 34 of Ergeb. Math. Grenzgeb., 3. Folge. Berlin: Springer, 2008

2008
[23]

T OPPING , P. M. A rigidity estimate for maps from S2 to S2 via the harmonic map flow. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 55, 1 (2023), 338–343. INSTITUT DE MATH ´EMATIQUES DE TOULOUSE , UMR 5219, CNRS, UPS IMT, UNIVERSIT ´E DE TOULOUSE , 31062 T OULOUSE CEDEX 9, F RANCE Email address: bi...

2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [4]

B., AND SIMON , T

B ERNAND -MANTEL , A., M URATOV, C. B., AND SIMON , T. M. A quantitative description of skyrmions in ultrathin ferromagnetic films 38 BIN DENG, RADU IGNAT, AND XA VIER LAMY and rigidity of degree ±1 harmonic maps from R2 to S2. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 239, 1 (2021), 219–299

work page 2021

[2] [1]

A BRAMOWITZ , M., AND STEGUN , I. A. Handbook of mathemat- ical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables. 10th printing, with corrections. National Bureau of Standards. A Wiley- Interscience Publication. New York etc.: John Wiley & Sons (1972), 1972

work page 1972

[3] [2]

Meron con- figurations in easy-plane chiral magnets

B ACHMANN , D., L IANERIS , M., AND KOMINEAS , S. Meron con- figurations in easy-plane chiral magnets. Phys. Rev. B 108 (Jul 2023), 014402

work page 2023

[4] [3]

Bimeron configuration in thin chiral ferromagnetic films with large easy-plane anisotropy

B ACHO , G., AND MELCHER , C. Bimeron configuration in thin chiral ferromagnetic films with large easy-plane anisotropy. In preparation

work page

[5] [5]

Degree theory of BMO

B R ´EZIS , H., AND NIRENBERG , L. Degree theory of BMO. I: Com- pact manifolds without boundaries. Sel. Math., New Ser. 1, 2 (1995), 197–263

work page 1995

[6] [6]

Compactness results for static and dynamic chiral skyrmions near the conformal limit

D ¨ORING , L., AND MELCHER , C. Compactness results for static and dynamic chiral skyrmions near the conformal limit. Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. 56, 3 (2017), 30. Id/No 60

work page 2017

[7] [7]

E STEBAN , M. J. A direct variational approach to Skyrme’s model for meson fields. Commun. Math. Phys. 105 (1986), 571–591

work page 1986

[8] [8]

G ¨OBEL , B., M OOK , A., H ENK , J., M ERTIG , I., AND TRETIAKOV , O. A. Magnetic bimerons as skyrmion analogues in in-plane magnets. Phys. Rev. B 99, 6 (2019), 060407

work page 2019