Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 52 references

Rydberg Composites

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read A flat atomic sheet gives one Rydberg atom a band spectrum

desk verdict Genuinely new framework with clean analytic scaling laws, but the 2D band structure rests on an unproven continuum limit and single-ν numerics; still deserves a serious referee. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.01097 v1 pith:DGWDEET5 submitted 2019-09-03 physics.atom-ph cond-mat.quant-gas

classification physics.atom-phcond-mat.quant-gas
keywords RydbergatomsmoleculesopticallatticesultracoldgasesFermipseudopotentialbandstructurequantumchaoslevelstatistics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces the Rydberg Composite: a single highly excited Rydberg atom enveloped by many ground-state atoms arranged on a one-, two-, or three-dimensional lattice. The authors aim to show that this object has a systematic spectral theory that connects the familiar few-scatterer “trilobite” molecules to the dense, homogeneous limit, with properties set by the principal quantum number $\nu$, the lattice spacing $d$, and the fill factor $F$. Their central result is that a two-dimensional monolayer keeps a rich, non-degenerate band structure in the dense limit, with band-edge energies scaling as $\nu^{-11/2}$ and crossing over to $\nu^{-6}$, while one- and three-dimensional composites shift uniformly and become degenerate again, with energies $\nu^{-5}$ and $\nu^{-6}$. In partially filled, disordered lattices the same Hamiltonian produces chaotic spectra whose level statistics match the Gaussian orthogonal ensemble. The appeal is that the planar geometry turns the lattice into a sculpting tool for the electronic wave function, promising controllable dense Rydberg systems.

What carries the argument

The central object is the single-manifold pseudopotential matrix $V_{lm,l'm'} = 2\pi a_s \sum_i \langle\nu lm|R_i\rangle\langle R_i|\nu l'm'\rangle$, evaluated inside one Rydberg manifold. In the homogeneous 2D limit this becomes an integral over the plane, and the factorization of the integrand into an azimuthal integral, a radial overlap integral, and a projection of spherical harmonics into the plane is what produces tractable structure: the azimuthal part gives $\delta_{mm'}$, the radial overlap gives near-diagonal dominance, and the spherical-harmonic projection gives the circular-state selectivity that organizes states into $b$-bands. The band index $b$, defined by $l=2b-2+m$, is the identity that carries the argument: states along a fixed $b$ diagonal have nearly identical overlap with the plane, so the problem becomes quasi-one-dimensional per band and yields the analytic dispersion relation $\tilde E^{2D}_{bk}\approx (8\nu+4(b-k)-1)\Gamma(b-1/2)/(8\pi^2\nu^{13/2}\Gamma(b))$. The same machinery, applied to 1D with the quantization axis along the chain and to 3D with the full volume integral, produces the degenerate shifts of Eqs. (27) and (29).

What would settle it

Diagonalize the full discrete-lattice matrix (Eq. 4) without any coarse-graining for several $\nu$ at lattice spacings at or below the critical spacing $d_c$, and compare the eigenvalues with the continuum-integral result of Eq. (14); if the spectra fail to converge to the predicted bands and to the $\nu^{-11/2}$/ $\nu^{-6}$ scalings, the homogeneous-density assumption is where the argument breaks down.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

At the paper’s core is the claim that the symmetry of the scatterer geometry, not the number of scatterers, determines the dense-limit spectrum. In the homogeneous limit, where the discrete lattice sum is replaced by an integral over a continuous density, the 2D monolayer Hamiltonian becomes block-diagonal in the angular momentum projection $m$ because the azimuthal integral forces $\delta_{mm'}$. Because only states with $l+m$ even have amplitude in the plane, each $m$-block contains states labeled by band indices $b$ and $k$, with $l=2b-2+m$ and $k=\nu-l$, and the dominant diagonal elements produce a dispersion-like spectrum. The paper derives analytically that the band lower edges scale as $\nu^{-11/2}$, the level spacing within a band as $b^{-1/2}\nu^{-13/2}$, and that the scaling crosses to $\nu^{-6}$ when bands overlap for large $b$; a universal density of states is obtained by interpolating between the two regimes with a hyperbolic tangent. For 1D and 3D the same homogeneous replacement leaves all states degenerate: in 1D a radial selection rule makes every state shift identically ($\nu^{-5}$), and in 3D the normalization integral gives a uniform shift ($\nu^{-6}$). For disordered partial filling, the adjacent gap ratio approaches the Gaussian orthogonal ensemble value $0.530$, indicating quantum chaos in the spectral fluctuations.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that below a critical lattice spacing the discrete lattice can be exchanged for a continuous, uniform density; if the Rydberg wave function still resolves individual scatterers at those densities, the band structure and the $\nu$ scaling exponents derived from that continuum replacement would change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A monolayer Rydberg Composite at lattice spacings below the critical value has a predictable, non-degenerate sequence of energy levels separated by a band gap, in contrast to dense 1D and 3D cases where all levels collapse onto one shifted energy.
  • Dense one- and three-dimensional composites give a single uniform shift of the whole Rydberg manifold, scaling as $\nu^{-5}$ or $\nu^{-6}$, so the spectrum itself stays simple while the shift encodes the scatterer density.
  • At partial filling, spectral fluctuations follow Gaussian orthogonal ensemble statistics, so a disordered 2D lattice offers a tunable laboratory for quantum chaos with $\nu$, $d$, and $F$ as control parameters.
  • At sufficiently high $\nu$ the composite manifold is energetically isolated from neighboring Rydberg manifolds, because its level shifts fall faster than the $\nu^{-3}$ inter-manifold spacing, making the single-manifold description self-consistent.
  • The known few-scatterer trilobite states and the dense homogeneous limit are connected by one Hamiltonian, so the same formalism interpolates between molecular and condensed-matter treatments of Rydberg matter.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not explore it, but the dispersion-like dependence of energy on $m$ within each band suggests that patterned lattice densities could encode a desired spectral function, effectively using the lattice as a template for the composite’s level structure.
  • A direct testable extension is to measure the adjacent-gap ratio across the predicted critical spacing $d_c$ for several $\nu$ values: Eq. (31) predicts a crossover from chaotic to symmetry-dominated statistics whose location should scale as $\nu^2$, a scaling the paper derives heuristically but does not verify numerically.
  • The same coarse-graining technique could be applied to other central potentials whose wave functions have a planar node structure, such as excitonic systems, as long as the scatterer distribution has a symmetry plane; this would generalize the band-formation mechanism beyond atomic Rydberg physics.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a model of a Rydberg atom coupled through a Fermi pseudopotential to many ground-state scatterers arranged on one-, two-, and three-dimensional lattices. Working in a single-ν-manifold basis, it identifies the number of shifted states and characteristic lattice spacings for each dimensionality, and it numerically computes densities of states and wave functions. In the homogeneous-density limit the paper derives an analytic 2D band structure with energy scaling ν^{-11/2} for the lower bands and ν^{-6} in the overlap region, together with degenerate ν^{-5} and ν^{-6} shifts in 1D and 3D. It also constructs a supposedly ν-independent 'universal' density of states for the 2D case and uses the adjacent gap ratio to argue that partially filled lattices display quantum chaos with GOE-like statistics once symmetry blocks are accounted for.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper provides a valuable systematic bridge between few-scatterer trilobite physics and dense atomic environments, with explicit, analytically transparent scaling predictions that are in principle testable in ultracold-atom experiments. The algebraic derivation of the band-edge exponents, the m-block reduction, and the symmetric C4v decomposition of the spectral statistics are concrete strengths. The RMT analysis is careful in using an unfolding-free diagnostic and in modeling the symmetry-blocked GOE reference, which strengthens the evidence for chaos in the disordered regime.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. IV B 4 and Appendix D, Eq. (D5)] The analytic band structure and the headline scaling exponents ν^{-11/2} and ν^{-6} are obtained in the continuum limit in which the discrete lattice sum of Eq. (4) is replaced by the uniform-plane integral of Eq. (10). The text explicitly takes this coarse-graining 'as fact,' and the rotational symmetry that produces the m-block-diagonal structure of Eq. (14), and hence the non-degenerate bands of Fig. 6, is a property of the continuum limit rather than of the discrete lattice. The critical-spacing criterion in Eq. (31) is heuristic: it is based on the angular node spacing of the unperturbed wave function at the inner turning point and is not derived from the full discrete Hamiltonian. The numerical evidence in Figs. 2 and 5 is for ν=30 and validates the DoS and Pm structure, but it does not test the band-edge eigenvalues or the scaling exponents against diagonalization of the discrete Eq. (4) as a function of ν. I request a direct convergence study comparing the discrete-lattice spectrum with the continuum eigenvalues of Eq. (14) for several ν values over the d/ν range where the bands are predicted, and a report of whether the exponents ν^{-11/2} and ν^{-6} are recovered before rotational symmetry is broken by lattice harmonics. Without this, the central quantitative claims rest on an unquantified assumption.
  2. [Sec. IV B 4 and Appendix D, Eq. (D5)] The 'universal' density of states in Fig. 8(c) is constructed with an interpolating tanh function whose parameters x0=-0.011 and w=0.0028 are fit to the numerical spectra, and with a compression factor b=0.1 that the text itself describes as 'somewhat arbitrary.' The integrated normalizations in Eqs. (D3) and (D4) also differ by factors of b^2. As presented, this is an empirical collapse and not a parameter-free universal prediction. The main text should state this distinction explicitly, and the stability of the collapse with respect to b, x0, and w (for instance over the range of ν shown in Fig. 8) should be quantified.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. III C] In the sentence beginning 'We will devote much of the reminder of this paper,' 'reminder' should be 'remainder.'
  2. [Sec. V, Eq. (31)] Equation (31) uses the magnetic quantum number m in sin(π/m), which gives a negative spacing for negative m; the formula should use |m|, and the approximate relation l=2(β-1)-m in the text should be written with |m| so that it remains valid for the full spectrum in Fig. 6.
  3. [Appendix D, Eq. (D1)] The symbol b is used both for the band index in Sec. IV A and for the compression factor in Appendix D; this overloading makes the formulas in Appendix D confusing and should be resolved by renaming one of them.
  4. [Appendix D, Eq. (D1)] The parameter g is introduced without an explicit definition in the main text; the reader is left to infer from context that g=1 in the band region and g=1/2 in the overlap region, and this should be stated.
  5. [Fig. 8] The caption of Fig. 8 reports a FWHM of approximately 0.0235, but the corresponding Gaussian width σ used in Eq. (D1) is not stated for panel (c); reporting σ would improve reproducibility.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Central band/scaling derivation is self-contained; only the tanh-interpolated 'universal' DoS is fit to the data it displays.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. IV B 4 and Appendix D, Eqs. D5-D6; Fig. 8c]
    "Fig. 8c presents a scaling that smoothly interpolates between these two regimes as a function of ~E. It allows us to construct a “universal” density of states for the 2D-Composite, independent of ν. ... For each of these fit functions we have found that a tanh function is sufficient to interpolate between band and overlap regions ... once these parameters are fit to the data."

    The “universal” DoS is not derived from the model: the interpolating tanh parameters (x0 = -0.011, w = 0.0028), the scaling factors f and g, and the compression factor b are fit to the same DoS data at ν = 40, 70, 100 that Fig. 8c then shows collapsing. The collapse is therefore imposed by the fit rather than independently predicted or derived. This is a fitted construction presented as a confirmed universal result. However, it is ancillary to the main claims: the ν^{-11/2} band scaling and the ν^{-6} overlap scaling are obtained analytically from the hydrogenic matrix elements (Eqs. 15-22), so this fitted step does not feed back into the central scaling laws.

full rationale

The central derivations are self-contained: Eq. 14 follows by replacing the discrete sum with an integral over a homogeneous plane (Eq. 10), and the band labels and ν^{-11/2}/ν^{-6} scalings are obtained analytically from hydrogenic radial matrix elements and spherical-harmonic projections (Eqs. 15-22), not fitted to the spectra in Figs. 2 and 5. The 1D and 3D degenerate shifts (Eqs. 27 and 29) use known hydrogenic radial integrals. The coarse-graining step “taken as fact” is an assumption rather than a circular reduction: the analytic results are derived from that stated approximation, not from the target band energies. The only fitted element is the tanh-interpolated “universal” DoS of Sec. IV B 4 and Appendix D, where x0, w, and scale factors are fit to the ν = 40, 70, 100 data and then displayed as a confirmed universal collapse; this is a curve-fitting presentation secondary to the main scaling claims. Self-citations to the authors’ earlier trilobite and C4v work provide context and projection-operator machinery, but the load-bearing agreement in Fig. 9b is computed numerically and compared directly to the true spectrum. Hence there is no significant circularity in the central derivation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are postulated; 'Rydberg Composite' is a conceptual label for a known type of Hamiltonian. The main ledger entries are the modeling approximations (pseudopotential, single manifold, frozen gas, coarse-graining) and the fitted interpolation parameters used only for the universal DoS presentation.

free parameters (3)
  • Universal DoS tanh center x0 = -0.011
    Fitted so the band (ν^-11/2) and overlap (ν^-6) scaling regions merge in Fig. 8c; no derivation is given for its value.
  • Universal DoS tanh width w = 0.0028
    Fitted transition width between scaling regimes in Appendix D; used to construct the 'universal' density of states.
  • Overlap compression factor b = 0.1
    Called 'somewhat arbitrary' in Appendix D; chosen by hand to make the band and overlap DoS appear on the same axes.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Fermi pseudopotential with s-wave contact interaction (Eq. 2) models each ground-state atom as a point scatterer.
    Used throughout; valid when scatterers are small and isotropic compared to the Rydberg wavelength.
  • domain assumption Single-ν-manifold truncation: only one Rydberg manifold is kept and the energy offset is set to zero (Sec. IIB).
    Justified in Sec. VI by arguing composite energy shifts scale faster than the ν^-3 manifold spacing, but it is an input, not a result.
  • domain assumption Scattering length as is energy-independent (Sec. IIB).
    Simplifies the pseudopotential; authors state it is increasingly accurate at high ν.
  • domain assumption Frozen-gas approximation: scatterers are static (Sec. IIA).
    Consistent with ultracold temperatures; neglects thermal or lattice dynamics.
  • ad hoc to paper Coarse-graining: in the d to 0 limit the discrete lattice is replaced by a continuous homogeneous density (Eq. 10).
    The paper explicitly says 'we will take it as fact that this coarse-graining is physically relevant' (Sec. IV); central for the analytic band structure.
  • domain assumption Hydrogenic spectrum with integer ν, ignoring quantum defects (Sec. IIB).
    Alkali deviations are small for high-l states; the majority of manifold states are hydrogenic.
  • standard math Radial matrix element R^(2) vanishes for l unequal to l' (Eq. 25).
    Cited from Ref. [33]; used to derive the 1D degenerate shift.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Rydberg Composites." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DGWDEET5

@misc{pith2026190901097,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Rydberg Composites},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DGWDEET5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.01097}
}
read the original abstract

We introduce the Rydberg Composite, a new class of Rydberg matter where a single Rydberg atom is interfaced with a dense environment of neutral ground state atoms. The properties of the Composite depend on both the Rydberg excitation, which provides the gross energetic and spatial scales, and on the distribution of ground state atoms within the volume of the Rydberg wave function, which sculpt the electronic states. The latter range from the "trilobites", for small numbers of scatterers, to delocalized and chaotic eigenstates for disordered scatterer arrays, culminating in the dense scatterer limit in symmetry-dominated wave functions which promise good control in future experiments. We characterize these scenarios with different theoretical methods, enabling us to obtain scaling behavior for the regular spectrum and measures of chaos and delocalization in the disordered regime. Thus, we obtain a systematic description of the Composite states. The 2D monolayer Composite possesses the richest spectrum with an intricate band structure in the limit of homogeneous scatterers.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1909.01097 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematics of the three scenarios we consider: (a) a linear chain ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Density of states (DoS) for a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Electronic densities of a 1D chain of scatterers for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The electron density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Dependence of the band structure of a 2D Ryd [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Density of states computed by convolving the spectrum using a Gaussian distribution for three [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. (a) Average AGR of 2000 realizations of a lattice [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. AGR for a filled lattice for a full lattice as a function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    trilobite

    1D lattice wave functions We present, for four different lattice spacings, two rep- resentative wave functions for theν = 30 1 D Rydberg Composite. Ontheleftweshowthestatewiththelargest energy shift, while on the right we choose a state slightly higher in energy than the degenerate band limit, i.e. one of the states visible in Fig. 2a just above the middle...

  2. [2]

    circular

    2D lattice wave functions Since only the electronic density in thez = 0 plane contributes to the energy shifts, it suffices to examine |Ψ(x,y, 0)| for the 2D-Composite. We first consider2D- Composite wave functions with a fully filled2D lattice and vary the lattice constant. In Fig. 4(Top) we show the wave functions corresponding to the first three odd- number...

  3. [3]

    2D scatterers The preceding analysis showed that the energy spec- trum of the2D-Composite exhibits two different scaling behaviors as a function of band number. The energies in the lower bands scale asν−5.5, but they scale asν−6 in the upper bands due to a mixture of overlapping bands and deviations from the diagonal approximation for small values ofl and m

  4. [4]

    band” scaling. Individual band contributions forν = 100, obtained from the dispersion curves in Fig. 6, are shown in grayscale. (b) the energies are scaled withν6, the “overlap

    1D scatterers Applying this same analysis to our1D and 3D config- urations leads quickly to the results that all states ex- perience an identical energy shift. In1D, the expression equivalent to Eq. 10 is lim d→0 ˜Vlm,l′m′ = a V1 ∫ ∞ 0 Ψ∗ νl0(R, 0,ϕ )Ψνl′0(R, 0,ϕ )dR (23) = a √ (2l + 1)(2l′ + 1) 4πV1 R(2) νl,νl′. (24) Curiously, this radial matrix element ...

  5. [5]

    (28) This is the normalization integral, and thus all Rydberg states are again degenerate, but with a global shift, ˜E3D lm = 3 4πν6

    3D scatterers For a homogeneous structure in 3D the matrix ele- ments are even simpler, lim d→0 ˜Vlm,l′m′ = a3 V3 ∫ V Ψ∗ νlm(R,θ,ϕ )Ψνl′m′(R,θ,ϕ )d3R. (28) This is the normalization integral, and thus all Rydberg states are again degenerate, but with a global shift, ˜E3D lm = 3 4πν6. (29) These scale asν−6, more slowly than the2D-Composite. The Rydberg Co...

  6. [6]

    overlap region

    Interpolation of low and high band edge scaling for 2D scatterers We now explore the DoS scaling in the2D case in fur- ther detail to arrive at a universal DoS for 2D Rydberg Composites in the homogeneous limit. We compute a smooth density of states, δN δ~E = N∑ i=1 F (~E;σ,~Ei), (30) where F is a convolution function for the discrete data, i.e. a Gaussia...

  7. [7]

    trilobite-limit

    Dropping terms of orderν−2 and assuming the angular resolution is smaller than any radial wave function feature we arrive at a critical lattice spacing dc≈ sin (π/m)ν2 √ 2 [ 1− √ 1− l(l + 1) ν2 ] . (31) The black curves in Fig. 5 are lines through the points (dβ,m,Eβ,m), where the connection betweenβ and l is made with the approximate relationl = 2(β− 1)−...

  8. [8]

    WhenF⁄= 1 we also average over many lattice realizations

    The adjacent gap ratio (AGR) To avoid unfolding, we resort to the so called adjacent gap ratio (AGR) [35, 37] AGR = ⟨ min(sn,sn−1) max(sn,sn−1) ⟩ (32) with sn =En−En−1 and the average⟨⟩ taken over the whole spectrum. WhenF⁄= 1 we also average over many lattice realizations. Since the AGR only depends on lo- cal fluctuations it does not require unfolding [3...

Show all 52 references
  1. [9]

    The evolution of AGR with the fill factor for different fixed lattice spacings One can see in Fig. 9a that towards small fill fac- tors, but compatible withN > ND where the spectrum 13 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 F 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5AGR (a) 2 4 6 dD d/ (a0) 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0...

  2. [10]

    trilobite basis

    The evolution of AGR for a filled lattice with decreasing lattice spacing For a filled latticeF = 1, Fig. 9b reveals that nei- ther GOE nor Poisson values match with the statistics observed for any lattice spacingd. For smalld towards the homogeneous limit, the AGR approaches ze...

  3. [11]

    Creation of polar and nonpolar ultra-long-range Ryd- berg molecules,

    C. H. Greene, A. S. Dickinson, and H. R. Sadeghpour, “Creation of polar and nonpolar ultra-long-range Ryd- berg molecules,” Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 2458–2461 (2000)

  4. [12]

    Polyatomic molecules formed with a Rydberg atom in an ultracold environ- ment,

    I. C. H. Liu and J. M. Rost, “Polyatomic molecules formed with a Rydberg atom in an ultracold environ- ment,” The European Physical Journal D - Atomic, Molecular, Optical and Plasma Physics40, 65–71 (2006)

  5. [13]

    Ultra-long- range Rydberg trimers with a repulsive two-body inter- action,

    I. C. H. Liu, J. Stanojevic, and J. M. Rost, “Ultra-long- range Rydberg trimers with a repulsive two-body inter- action,” Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 173001 (2009)

  6. [14]

    Observation of ultralong-range Rydberg molecules,

    V. Bendkowsky, B. Butscher, J. Nipper, J. P. Shaffer, R. Löw, and T. Pfau, “Observation of ultralong-range Rydberg molecules,” Nature458, 1005 (2009)

  7. [15]

    Rydberg trimers and excited dimersboundbyinternalquantumreflection,

    V. Bendkowsky, B. Butscher, J. Nipper, J. B. Balewski, J. P. Shaffer, R. Löw, T. Pfau, W. Li, J. Stanojevic, T. Pohl, and J. M. Rost, “Rydberg trimers and excited dimersboundbyinternalquantumreflection,” Phys.Rev. Lett. 105, 163201 (2010)

  8. [16]

    Ultralong-range polyatomic Ryd- berg molecules formed by a polar perturber,

    S. T. Rittenhouse, M. Mayle, P. Schmelcher, and H. R. Sadeghpour, “Ultralong-range polyatomic Ryd- berg molecules formed by a polar perturber,” Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics44, 184005 (2011)

  9. [17]

    Ultracold giant polyatomic Rydberg molecules: Coherent control of molecular orientation,

    S. T. Rittenhouse and H. R. Sadeghpour, “Ultracold giant polyatomic Rydberg molecules: Coherent control of molecular orientation,” Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 243002 (2010)

  10. [18]

    Electronic structure of ultralong-range Rydberg penta-atomic molecules with two polar diatomic molecules,

    J. Aguilera-Fernández, H. R. Sadeghpour, P. Schmelcher, and R. González-Férez, “Electronic structure of ultralong-range Rydberg penta-atomic molecules with two polar diatomic molecules,” Phys. Rev. A96, 052509 (2017)

  11. [19]

    Electric field control in ultralong-range tri- atomic polar Rydberg molecules,

    M. Mayle, S. T. Rittenhouse, P. Schmelcher, and H. R. Sadeghpour, “Electric field control in ultralong-range tri- atomic polar Rydberg molecules,” Phys. Rev. A 85, 052511 (2012)

  12. [20]

    Giant Rydberg excitons in the copper oxide Cu2O,

    T. Kazimierczuk, D. Fröhlich, S. Scheel, H. Stolz, and M. Bayer, “Giant Rydberg excitons in the copper oxide Cu2O,” Nature514, 343 EP – (2014)

  13. [21]

    Observation of spatially ordered structures in a two- dimensional Rydberg gas,

    P. Schauß, M. Cheneau, M. Endres, T. Fukuhara, S. Hild, A. Omran, T. Pohl, C. Gross, S. Kuhr, and I. Bloch, “Observation of spatially ordered structures in a two- dimensional Rydberg gas,” Nature491, 87 (2012)

  14. [22]

    Many- body theory of excitation dynamics in an ultracold Ryd- berg gas,

    C. Ates, T. Pohl, T. Pattard, and J. M. Rost, “Many- body theory of excitation dynamics in an ultracold Ryd- berg gas,” Phys. Rev. A76, 013413 (2007)

  15. [23]

    Strongly correlated gases of Rydberg- dressed atoms: Quantum and classical dynamics,

    G. Pupillo, A. Micheli, M. Boninsegni, I. Lesanovsky, and P. Zoller, “Strongly correlated gases of Rydberg- dressed atoms: Quantum and classical dynamics,” Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 223002 (2010)

  16. [24]

    Theory of excitation of Rydberg polarons in an atomic quantum gas,

    R. Schmidt, J. D. Whalen, R. Ding, F. Camargo, G. Woehl, S. Yoshida, J. Burgdörfer, F. B. Dunning, E.Demler, H.R.Sadeghpour, andT.C.Killian,“Theory of excitation of Rydberg polarons in an atomic quantum gas,” Phys. Rev. A97, 022707 (2018)

  17. [25]

    Cre- ation of Rydberg polarons in a Bose gas,

    F. Camargo, R. Schmidt, J. D. Whalen, R. Ding, G. Woehl, S. Yoshida, J. Burgdörfer, F. B. Dunning, H. R. Sadeghpour, E. Demler, and T. C. Killian, “Cre- ation of Rydberg polarons in a Bose gas,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 083401 (2018)

  18. [26]

    From molecular spectra to a density shift in dense Rydberg gases,

    A. Gaj, A. T. Krupp, J. B. Balewski, R. Löw, S. Hoffer- berth, and T. Pfau, “From molecular spectra to a density shift in dense Rydberg gases,” Nature communications5, 4546 (2014)

  19. [27]

    Meso- scopic Rydberg impurity in an atomic quantum gas,

    R. Schmidt, H. R. Sadeghpour, and E. Demler, “Meso- scopic Rydberg impurity in an atomic quantum gas,” Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 105302 (2016)

  20. [28]

    Polyatomic trilobite 18 Rydberg molecules in a dense random gas,

    P. J. J. Luukko and J. M. Rost, “Polyatomic trilobite 18 Rydberg molecules in a dense random gas,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 203001 (2017)

  21. [29]

    Ultracold molecular Rydberg physics in a high density environment,

    M. T. Eiles, J. Pérez-Ríos, F. Robicheaux, and C. H. Greene, “Ultracold molecular Rydberg physics in a high density environment,” Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics49, 114005 (2016)

  22. [30]

    Ultracold quantum gases in optical lattices,

    I. Bloch, “Ultracold quantum gases in optical lattices,” Nature Physics1, 23–30 (2005)

  23. [31]

    Controllable quantum scars in semiconductor quantum dots,

    J. Keski-Rahkonen, P. J. J. Luukko, L. Kaplan, E. J. Heller, and E. Räsänen, “Controllable quantum scars in semiconductor quantum dots,” Phys. Rev. B96, 094204 (2017)

  24. [32]

    Effects of scarring on quantum chaos in dis- ordered quantum wells,

    J. Keski-Rahkonen, P. J. J. Luukko, S. Åberg, and E. Räsänen, “Effects of scarring on quantum chaos in dis- ordered quantum wells,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 31, 105301 (2019)

  25. [33]

    Wave functions with localizations on classical periodic orbits in weakly perturbed quantum billiards,

    C.C.Liu, T.H.Lu, Y.F.Chen, andK.F.Huang,“Wave functions with localizations on classical periodic orbits in weakly perturbed quantum billiards,” Phys. Rev. E74, 046214 (2006)

  26. [34]

    Elastic electron scattering from a multicentred potential,

    A. Sitenko and O. Gerasimov, “Elastic electron scattering from a multicentred potential,” Physics Letters A171, 71 – 75 (1992)

  27. [35]

    The application of general zero-range po- tentials to multi-center problems,

    A. Baltenkov, “The application of general zero-range po- tentials to multi-center problems,” Physics Letters A 268, 92 – 99 (2000)

  28. [36]

    Bound states ofn-dimensional harmonic oscillator decorated with Dirac delta functions,

    E. Demiralp, “Bound states ofn-dimensional harmonic oscillator decorated with Dirac delta functions,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General38, 4783–4793 (2005)

  29. [37]

    Bose-Einstein condensate in a harmonic trap decorated with Diracδ functions,

    H. Uncu, D. Tarhan, E. Demiralp, and O. E. Müstecaplioğlu, “Bose-Einstein condensate in a harmonic trap decorated with Diracδ functions,” Phys. Rev. A76, 013618 (2007)

  30. [38]

    Sopra lo spostamento per pressione delle righe elevate delle serie spettrali,

    E. Fermi, “Sopra lo spostamento per pressione delle righe elevate delle serie spettrali,” Il Nuovo Cimento11, 157 (1934)

  31. [39]

    Low-lying 3Po and 3Se states ofRb−,Cs −, andFr −,

    C. Bahrim and U. Thumm, “Low-lying 3Po and 3Se states ofRb−,Cs −, andFr −,” Phys. Rev. A61, 022722 (2000)

  32. [40]

    Effect of pressure on high terms of alkaline spectra,

    E. Amaldi and E. Segrè, “Effect of pressure on high terms of alkaline spectra,” Nature (London)133, 141 (1934)

  33. [41]

    Verschiebung und un- symmetrische Verbreiterung von Absorptionslinien durch Fremdgase,

    C. Füchtbauer and F. Gössler, “Verschiebung und un- symmetrische Verbreiterung von Absorptionslinien durch Fremdgase,” Zeitschrift für Physik87, 89 (1934)

  34. [42]

    Building princi- ple of triatomic trilobite Rydberg molecules,

    C. Fey, F. Hummel, and P. Schmelcher, “Building princi- ple of triatomic trilobite Rydberg molecules,” Phys. Rev. A 99, 022506 (2019)

  35. [43]

    Radial matrix elements for the hydrogen atom,

    M. Enciso-Aguilar, J. López-Bonilla, and M. Sánchez- Meraz, “Radial matrix elements for the hydrogen atom,” Electronic Journal of Theoretical Physics 13, 117–120 (2006)

  36. [44]

    M. C. Gutzwiller,Chaos in classical and quantum me- chanics, Vol. 1 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013)

  37. [45]

    Distribution of the ratio of consecutive level spacings in random matrix ensembles,

    Y. Y. Atas, E. Bogomolny, O. Giraud, and G. Roux, “Distribution of the ratio of consecutive level spacings in random matrix ensembles,” Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 084101 (2013)

  38. [46]

    Random-matrix theory,

    F. Haake, “Random-matrix theory,” inQuantum Signa- tures of Chaos(Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Hei- delberg, 2001) pp. 47–118

  39. [47]

    Localization of inter- acting fermions at high temperature,

    V. Oganesyan and D. A. Huse, “Localization of inter- acting fermions at high temperature,” Phys. Rev. B75, 155111 (2007)

  40. [48]

    Formation of long-range Rydberg molecules in two-component ultracold gases,

    M. T. Eiles, “Formation of long-range Rydberg molecules in two-component ultracold gases,” Phys. Rev. A98, 042706 (2018)

  41. [49]

    Realization of a fractional period adiabatic superlattice,

    R. Anderson, D. Trypogeorgos, A. Valdés-Curiel, Q.-Y. Liang, J. Tao, M. Zhao, T. Andrijauskas, G. Juzeli¯ unas, and I. Spielman, “Realization of a fractional period adiabatic superlattice,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.08910 (2019)

  42. [50]

    Production of very-high-n strontium Rydberg atoms,

    S. Ye, X. Zhang, T. C. Killian, F. B. Dunning, M. Hiller, S. Yoshida, S. Nagele, and J. Burgdörfer, “Production of very-high-n strontium Rydberg atoms,” Phys. Rev. A 88, 043430 (2013)

  43. [51]

    Trilobites, butterflies, and other exotic specimens of long-range Rydberg molecules,

    M. T. Eiles, “Trilobites, butterflies, and other exotic specimens of long-range Rydberg molecules,” Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics52, 113001 (2019)

  44. [52]

    Quantum and semiclassical analysis of long-range Ry- dberg molecules,

    B. E. Granger, E. L. Hamilton, and C. H. Greene, “Quantum and semiclassical analysis of long-range Ry- dberg molecules,” Phys. Rev. A64, 042508 (2001)

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.