Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 73 references

Peptide Structure Prediction Using Counter-Diabatic Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (CD-QAOA)

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-28 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read CD-QAOA adds a counter-diabatic term to speed convergence when finding low-energy conformations of a heptapeptide on a tetrahedral lattice.

desk verdict Applies CD-QAOA to the standard lattice peptide model for one heptapeptide but the validation step risks circularity with the classical comparators. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.01611 v1 pith:DIHQB6J6 submitted 2026-06-01 q-bio.BM

Sung Won Yun , Yeon Gyo Seo , Seong Hun Jang , Suhyun Park , Joonwoo Bae , Sangwook Wu This is my paper · ORCID
classification q-bio.BM
keywords peptidestructurepredictionQAOAcounter-diabaticquantumoptimizationMiyazawa-Jerniganmatrixlatticemodelhybridquantum-classical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper applies CD-QAOA to the structure prediction of the seven-residue peptide APRLRFY by representing its residue interactions on a tetrahedral lattice. Standard QAOA follows an adiabatic path that can converge slowly; the added counter-diabatic driving term is introduced to suppress non-adiabatic transitions and reach the ground state faster. Two interaction models are tested—one limited to the proline-tyrosine contact and one using the full Miyazawa-Jernigan matrix—and the resulting lattice conformations are compared with structures obtained from Hartree-Fock, DFT, conventional MD, and Hamiltonian replica-exchange MD. The authors conclude that the hybrid quantum-classical procedure recovers consistent low-energy states while improving computational efficiency for short peptides.

What carries the argument

Counter-diabatic driving term added to the QAOA variational circuit to accelerate passage to the ground state of the peptide energy function on the lattice.

What would settle it

Map the lattice conformation produced by CD-QAOA for APRLRFY back to all-atom coordinates and check whether it matches the experimentally determined NMR or crystal structure of the same sequence.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

CD-QAOA, by augmenting the QAOA Hamiltonian with a counter-diabatic driving term, produces lattice conformations of the heptapeptide APRLRFY that are structurally similar to those generated by classical Hartree-Fock, DFT, MD, and H-REMD calculations when either a single key residue pair or the complete Miyazawa-Jernigan interaction matrix is used.

Load-bearing premise

The tetrahedral lattice plus Miyazawa-Jernigan matrix captures enough of real peptide energetics that agreement between quantum and classical outputs validates the quantum structures rather than merely reflecting shared model simplifications.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • CD-QAOA recovers consistent low-energy states whether only the proline-tyrosine contact or all pairwise Miyazawa-Jernigan interactions are encoded.
  • The counter-diabatic term shortens the number of iterations needed to locate ground-state conformations relative to plain QAOA.
  • Structures obtained from the quantum optimizer agree with those from Hartree-Fock, DFT, MD and H-REMD runs.
  • A quantum-classical hybrid workflow can therefore serve as an alternative route to short-peptide structure prediction.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same counter-diabatic acceleration could be tested on other lattice-based biomolecular problems such as protein docking or RNA folding.
  • If the lattice representation is refined with additional geometric constraints, the method might extend to slightly longer sequences without losing the reported speedup.
  • Running the identical energy function on larger quantum hardware would directly measure whether the observed iteration reduction survives device noise.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript applies the Counter-Diabatic Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (CD-QAOA) to predict the 3D structure of the heptapeptide APRLRFY on a tetrahedral lattice. Two interaction models are considered: (i) only the proline-tyrosine contact and (ii) all residue-residue contacts via the Miyazawa-Jernigan matrix. The resulting conformations are compared for structural similarity to those obtained from classical Hartree-Fock, DFT, MD, and Hamiltonian replica-exchange MD calculations; the authors conclude that the CD-QAOA hybrid framework improves both efficiency and accuracy for short-peptide structure prediction.

Significance. Demonstration of a counter-diabatic variant of QAOA on a lattice protein model could illustrate how additional driving terms affect convergence in combinatorial optimization problems relevant to biomolecular conformation search. However, because the work remains confined to a highly coarse-grained lattice Hamiltonian whose relationship to real peptide energetics is not quantified, any claimed improvement in accuracy is limited to the model itself rather than to experimentally relevant structures.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that 'structural similarities among the conformations obtained from these different approaches were systematically analyzed' is unsupported by any quantitative metric (RMSD, TM-score, contact-map overlap, etc.), error bars, or description of the comparison protocol, rendering the claim of improved accuracy impossible to evaluate.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract (validation paragraph): it is not stated whether the HF, DFT, MD, and H-REMD runs were performed on the identical tetrahedral lattice Hamiltonian with the same MJ contact energies or on independent all-atom force fields with experimental restraints. If the former, structural agreement is expected by construction and does not constitute external validation of the CD-QAOA structures.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: 'intermolecular interactions' is used for contacts within a single peptide chain; the term should be 'intramolecular'.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract mentions two distinct interaction subsets but does not indicate how the counter-diabatic coefficient or the MJ matrix entries were chosen or optimized, leaving the number of free parameters unclear.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and will revise the abstract and relevant sections to improve clarity and provide the requested details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that 'structural similarities among the conformations obtained from these different approaches were systematically analyzed' is unsupported by any quantitative metric (RMSD, TM-score, contact-map overlap, etc.), error bars, or description of the comparison protocol, rendering the claim of improved accuracy impossible to evaluate.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract does not specify the quantitative metrics or protocol used for comparing conformations. The full manuscript describes the structural comparisons, but to make the claim evaluable we will revise the abstract to include specific metrics (e.g., RMSD, contact-map overlap) along with a brief description of the comparison protocol and any associated variability. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (validation paragraph): it is not stated whether the HF, DFT, MD, and H-REMD runs were performed on the identical tetrahedral lattice Hamiltonian with the same MJ contact energies or on independent all-atom force fields with experimental restraints. If the former, structural agreement is expected by construction and does not constitute external validation of the CD-QAOA structures.

    Authors: We will revise the manuscript to explicitly clarify that the HF and DFT calculations were performed with all-atom quantum chemistry methods and that the MD and H-REMD simulations used standard all-atom force fields, independent of the tetrahedral lattice model and MJ matrix. This establishes them as external validation rather than comparisons within the same Hamiltonian. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; validation uses independent classical methods.

full rationale

The paper defines a tetrahedral lattice Hamiltonian with Miyazawa-Jernigan interactions and applies CD-QAOA to locate low-energy conformations within that discrete model. It then reports structural agreement with separate classical computations (HF, DFT, MD, H-REMD) whose standard formulations operate in continuous all-atom space rather than the lattice. No equation reduces the reported structures to the QAOA output by construction, no parameter is fitted on a subset and relabeled a prediction, and no load-bearing premise rests on a self-citation chain. The derivation therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Central claim rests on standard lattice discretization, pre-fitted MJ parameters from prior protein statistics, and the assumption that classical methods provide independent ground truth. No new entities introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • counter-diabatic term coefficient
    Strength of added driving term in CD-QAOA, typically tuned per instance
  • Miyazawa-Jernigan matrix entries
    Statistical potentials fitted to observed protein contacts in earlier literature
assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Tetrahedral lattice captures essential backbone geometry and steric constraints of real peptides
    Invoked when mapping the heptapeptide to discrete sites
  • standard math Adiabatic theorem and counter-diabatic correction yield ground-state approximation for the chosen schedule
    Basis of both QAOA and its CD extension

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Peptide Structure Prediction Using Counter-Diabatic Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (CD-QAOA)." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DIHQB6J6

@misc{pith2026260601611,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Peptide Structure Prediction Using Counter-Diabatic Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (CD-QAOA)},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DIHQB6J6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.01611}
}
read the original abstract

In this study, we predicted the structure of the heptapeptide APRLRFY, a neuropeptide sequence, on a tetrahedral lattice using a Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA). QAOA is based on the adiabatic approximation and has been successfully applied to a wide range of optimization problems. However, relatively slow convergence during ground-state searches has frequently been reported. To overcome this limitation, we employed the Counter-Diabatic Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (CD-QAOA), which introduces an additional counter-diabatic driving term into the adiabatic framework to accelerate convergence toward the ground state during peptide structure prediction. In the heptapeptide structure prediction, intermolecular interactions were modeled using two different approaches. In the first approach, only the interaction between the second residue, proline (P), and the seventh residue, tyrosine (Y), was included in the optimization. In the second approach, all residue-residue interactions within the heptapeptide were modeled using the Miyazawa-Jernigan (MJ) interaction matrix. To validate the peptide structures predicted using CD-QAOA, we additionally employed several classical computational methods, including quantum chemistry-based Hartree-Fock (HF) calculation and Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculation, conventional molecular dynamics (MD) simulation, and Hamiltonian replica exchange molecular dynamics (H-REMD) simulation. The structural similarities among the conformations obtained from these different approaches were systematically analyzed. CD-QAOA is highly effective for predicting the structures of short peptides. In particular, we demonstrate that a quantum-classical hybrid framework can significantly improve both the efficiency and accuracy of peptide structure prediction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.01611 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Historical overview of protein-folding approaches based on classical and quantum computing. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the tetrahedral lattice and CD-QAOA circuit. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Probability distributions of CD-QAOA and reconstructed APRLRFY [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Probability distributions of CD-QAOA with the MJ interaction and reconstructed APRL [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Structural comparison of the initial and Hartree–Fock-optimized ground-state configurations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: DFT-optimized structure of the APRLRFY peptide in an aqueous environment using the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: MD-refined structure of the APRLRFY peptide after relaxation of the AI-based initial [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Conformational space sampling of APRLRFY by H-REMD calculation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Alignments of predicted structures of APRLRFY using different methods. 1 and 7 denote [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Side-chain orientations in APRLRFY peptide structures predicted by different computa [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Are there pathways for protein folding?Journal de Chimie Physique, 65:44–45, 1968

    Cyrus Levinthal. Are there pathways for protein folding?Journal de Chimie Physique, 65:44–45, 1968

    1968

  2. [2]

    How to fold graciously

    Cyrus Levinthal. How to fold graciously. InM¨ ossbauer Spectroscopy in Biological Systems, pages 22–24. University of Illinois Press, 1969

    1969

  3. [3]

    The levinthal paradox: yesterday and today.Folding and Design, 2(4):S69–S75, 1997

    Martin Karplus. The levinthal paradox: yesterday and today.Folding and Design, 2(4):S69–S75, 1997

    1997

  4. [4]

    Ivankov and Alexei V

    Dmitry N. Ivankov and Alexei V. Finkelstein. Solution of levinthal’s paradox and a physical theory of protein folding times.Biomolecules, 10(2):250, 2020

    2020

  5. [5]

    Highly accurate protein structure prediction with alphafold.Nature, 596(7873):583–589, 2021

    John Jumper, Richard Evans, Alexander Pritzel, Tim Green, Michael Figurnov, Olaf Ronneberger, Kathryn Tunyasuvunakool, Russ Bates, Augustin ˇZ´ ıdek, Anna Potapenko, et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with alphafold.Nature, 596(7873):583–589, 2021

    2021

  6. [6]

    Burley, Dennis W

    Stephen K. Burley, Dennis W. Piehl, Brinda Vallat, and Christine Zardecki. Rcsb protein data bank: supporting research and education worldwide through explorations of experimentally de- termined and computationally predicted atomic level 3d biostructures.IUCrJ, 11:279–286, 2024

    2024

  7. [7]

    Pdb reaches a new milestone.https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ pdbe/news/pdb-reaches-new-milestone, 2026

    Protein Data Bank in Europe (PDBe). Pdb reaches a new milestone.https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ pdbe/news/pdb-reaches-new-milestone, 2026. Accessed: 2026-05-11

    2026

  8. [8]

    Satpdb: a database of structurally annotated therapeutic peptides.Nucleic Acids Research, 44(D1):D1119–D1126, 2016

    Shailendra Singh et al. Satpdb: a database of structurally annotated therapeutic peptides.Nucleic Acids Research, 44(D1):D1119–D1126, 2016. 20

    2016

Show all 73 references
  1. [9]

    Apd3: the antimicrobial peptide database as a tool for research and education.Nucleic Acids Research, 44(D1):D1087–D1093, 2016

    Guangshun Wang, Xia Li, and Zhe Wang. Apd3: the antimicrobial peptide database as a tool for research and education.Nucleic Acids Research, 44(D1):D1087–D1093, 2016

    2016

  2. [10]

    Neuropep: a comprehensive resource of neuropeptides.Database, 2015:bav038, 2015

    Yadong Wang et al. Neuropep: a comprehensive resource of neuropeptides.Database, 2015:bav038, 2015

    2015

  3. [11]

    Qupepfold: A python package for hybrid quantum-classical protein folding simulations with cvar-optimized vqe.PLOS ONE, 21:1–20, 02 2026

    Akshay Uttarkar, Vidya Niranjan, Amit Saxena, and Vinay Kumar. Qupepfold: A python package for hybrid quantum-classical protein folding simulations with cvar-optimized vqe.PLOS ONE, 21:1–20, 02 2026

    2026

  4. [12]

    Peptide conformational sampling using the quantum approximate optimization algorithm.npj Quantum Information, 9:1–12, 2023

    Sami Boulebnane, Xavier Lucas, Agnes Meyder, Stanislaw Adaszewski, and Ashley Montanaro. Peptide conformational sampling using the quantum approximate optimization algorithm.npj Quantum Information, 9:1–12, 2023

    2023

  5. [13]

    Barkoutsos, Stefan Woerner, and Ivano Tavernelli

    Anton Robert, Panagiotis Kl. Barkoutsos, Stefan Woerner, and Ivano Tavernelli. Resource-efficient quantum algorithm for protein folding.npj Quantum Information, 7(38):1–5, 2021

    2021

  6. [14]

    DiFilippo, Jun Qin, Daniel Blankenberg, and Omar Shehab

    Hakan Doga, Bryan Raubenolt, Fabio Cumbo, Jayadev Joshi, Frank P. DiFilippo, Jun Qin, Daniel Blankenberg, and Omar Shehab. A perspective on protein structure prediction using quantum computers.Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 20(14):3359–3378, 2024

    2024

  7. [15]

    Kit Fun Lau and Ken A. Dill. A lattice statistical mechanics model of the conformational and sequence spaces of proteins.Macromolecules, 22(10):3986–3997, 1989

    1989

  8. [16]

    Love, Al´ an Aspuru-Guzik, and Jeremy L

    Alberto Peruzzo, Jarrod McClean, Peter Shadbolt, Man-Hong Yung, Xiao-Qi Zhou, Peter J. Love, Al´ an Aspuru-Guzik, and Jeremy L. O’Brien. A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor.Nature Communications, 5:4213, 2014

    2014

  9. [17]

    McClean, Jonathan Romero, Ryan Babbush, and Al´ an Aspuru-Guzik

    Jarrod R. McClean, Jonathan Romero, Ryan Babbush, and Al´ an Aspuru-Guzik. The theory of variational hybrid quantum-classical algorithms.New Journal of Physics, 18(2):023023, 2016

    2016

  10. [18]

    A quantum approximate optimization algorithm.arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.4028, 2014

    Edward Farhi, Jeffrey Goldstone, and Sam Gutmann. A quantum approximate optimization algorithm.arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.4028, 2014

    2014 arXiv

  11. [19]

    A quantum approximate optimization algorithm applied to a bounded occurrence constraint problem.arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6062, 2014

    Edward Farhi, Jeffrey Goldstone, and Sam Gutmann. A quantum approximate optimization algorithm applied to a bounded occurrence constraint problem.arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6062, 2014

    2014 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Quantum computing in the nisq era and beyond.Quantum, 2:79, 2018

    John Preskill. Quantum computing in the nisq era and beyond.Quantum, 2:79, 2018

    2018

  13. [21]

    Ising formulations of many np problems.Frontiers in Physics, 2:5, 2014

    Andrew Lucas. Ising formulations of many np problems.Frontiers in Physics, 2:5, 2014

    2014

  14. [22]

    Benchmarking the performance of portfolio optimization with qaoa.Quantum Information Processing, 22:25, 2023

    Sebastian Brandhofer, Daniel Braun, Vanessa Dehn, et al. Benchmarking the performance of portfolio optimization with qaoa.Quantum Information Processing, 22:25, 2023

    2023

  15. [23]

    Behera, Emad A

    Utkarsh Azad, Bikash K. Behera, Emad A. Ahmed, Prasanta K. Panigrahi, and Ahmed Farouk. Solving vehicle routing problem using quantum approximate optimization algorithm.IEEE Trans- actions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 23(11):22122–22131, 2022

    2022

  16. [24]

    Hale F. Trotter. On the product of semi-groups of operators.Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 10(4):545–551, 1959

    1959

  17. [25]

    McClean, Sergio Boixo, Vadim N

    Jarrod R. McClean, Sergio Boixo, Vadim N. Smelyanskiy, Ryan Babbush, and Hartmut Neven. Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapes.Nature Communications, 9:4812, 2018

    2018

  18. [26]

    Digitized-counterdiabatic quantum approximate optimization algorithm.Physical Review A, 105(4):042612, 2022

    Jonathan Wurtz and Peter Love. Digitized-counterdiabatic quantum approximate optimization algorithm.Physical Review A, 105(4):042612, 2022

    2022

  19. [27]

    Convergence of digitized-counterdiabatic qaoa: circuit depth versus free parameters.Physical Review A, 109(1):012420, 2024

    Mara Vizzuso, Gianluca Passarelli, Giovanni Cantele, and Procolo Lucignano. Convergence of digitized-counterdiabatic qaoa: circuit depth versus free parameters.Physical Review A, 109(1):012420, 2024. 21

    2024

  20. [28]

    Michael V. Berry. Transitionless quantum driving.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 42(36):365303, 2009

    2009

  21. [29]

    Shortcuts to adiabaticity: Concepts, methods, and applications

    David Gu´ ery-Odelin, Andreas Ruschhaupt, Anthony Kiely, Erik Torrontegui, Silvia Mart´ ınez- Garaot, and Juan Gonzalo Muga. Shortcuts to adiabaticity: Concepts, methods, and applications. Reviews of Modern Physics, 91(4):045001, 2019

    2019

  22. [30]

    Mustafa Demirplak and Stuart A. Rice. Adiabatic population transfer with control fields.The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 107(46):9937–9945, 2003

    2003

  23. [31]

    B. S. Rothman, D. Weir, F. Khachatrian, K. M. Dias, and K. E. Eipper. Primary structure and neuronal effects of alpha-bag cell peptide, a second candidate neurotransmitter encoded by a single gene in bag cell neurons of aplysia.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, ...

    1983

  24. [32]

    S. M. Pulst et al. Presence of immunoreactive alpha-bag cell peptide[1-8] in bag cell neurons of aplysia suggests novel carboxypeptidase processing of neuropeptides.Neuropeptides, 10(3):249– 259, 1987

    1987

  25. [33]

    S. M. Pulst, M. S. Robinson, et al. Coexistence of egg-laying hormone and alpha-bag cell peptide in bag cell neurons of aplysia indicates that they are a peptidergic multitransmitter system. Neuroscience Letters, 70(1):40–45, 1986

    1986

  26. [34]

    M. K. Rock et al. Effects of synthetic bag cell and atrial gland peptides on identified nerve cells in aplysia.Journal of Neurobiology, 17(4):273–290, 1986

    1986

  27. [35]

    Hegade, Koushik Paul, Francisco Albarr´ an-Arriagada, Enrique Solano, Adolfo del Campo, and Xi Chen

    Pranav Chandarana, Narendra N. Hegade, Koushik Paul, Francisco Albarr´ an-Arriagada, Enrique Solano, Adolfo del Campo, and Xi Chen. Digitized-counterdiabatic quantum approximate opti- mization algorithm.Physical Review Research, 4(1):013141, 2022

    2022

  28. [36]

    Ostlund.Modern Quantum Chemistry: Introduction to Advanced Elec- tronic Structure Theory

    Attila Szabo and Neil S. Ostlund.Modern Quantum Chemistry: Introduction to Advanced Elec- tronic Structure Theory. Dover Publications, Mineola, New York, 1996

    1996

  29. [37]

    Christian Møller and Milton S. Plesset. Note on an approximation treatment for many-electron systems.Physical Review, 46:618–622, 1934

    1934

  30. [38]

    Trucks, John A

    Krishnan Raghavachari, Gary W. Trucks, John A. Pople, and Martin Head-Gordon. A fifth-order perturbation comparison of electron correlation theories.Chemical Physics Letters, 157(6):479– 483, 1989

    1989

  31. [39]

    John F. Stanton. Why ccsd(t) works: A different perspective.Chemical Physics Letters, 281(1– 3):130–134, 1997

    1997

  32. [40]

    Perdew and Alex Zunger

    John P. Perdew and Alex Zunger. Self-interaction correction to density-functional approximations for many-electron systems.Physical Review B, 23(10):5048–5079, 1981

    1981

  33. [41]

    Hohenberg and W

    P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn. Inhomogeneous electron gas.Physical Review, 136:B864–B871, 1964

    1964

  34. [42]

    Kohn and L

    W. Kohn and L. J. Sham. Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects. Physical Review, 140:A1133–A1138, 1965

    1965

  35. [43]

    A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (dft-d) for the 94 elements h–pu

    Stefan Grimme, Jens Antony, Stephan Ehrlich, and Helge Krieg. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (dft-d) for the 94 elements h–pu. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 132:154104, 2010

    2010

  36. [44]

    A generally applicable atomic-charge dependent Lon- don dispersion correction.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 150(15):154122, 2019

    Eike Caldeweyher, Sebastian Ehlert, Andreas Hansen, Hagen Neugebauer, Sebastian Spicher, Christoph Bannwarth, and Stefan Grimme. A generally applicable atomic-charge dependent Lon- don dispersion correction.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 150(15):154122, 2019

    2019

  37. [45]

    Long-range corrected hybrid density functionals with damped atom–atom dispersion corrections.Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 10(44):6615– 6620, 2008

    Jeng-Da Chai and Martin Head-Gordon. Long-range corrected hybrid density functionals with damped atom–atom dispersion corrections.Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 10(44):6615– 6620, 2008. 22

    2008

  38. [46]

    Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory.Journal of Computational Chemistry, 32(7):1456–1465, 2011

    Stefan Grimme, Stephan Ehrlich, and Lars Goerigk. Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory.Journal of Computational Chemistry, 32(7):1456–1465, 2011

    2011

  39. [47]

    M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, G. E. Scuseria, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, G. Scal- mani, V. Barone, G. A. Petersson, H. Nakatsuji, X. Li, M. Caricato, A. V. Marenich, J. Bloino, B. G. Janesko, R. Gomperts, B. Mennucci, H. P. Hratchian, J. V. Ortiz, A. F. Izmaylo...

    2016

  40. [48]

    M. P. Allen and D. J. Tildesley.Computer Simulation of Liquids. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2 edition, 2017

    2017

  41. [49]

    Ponder and David A

    Jay W. Ponder and David A. Case. Force fields for protein simulations.Advances in Protein Chemistry, 66:27–85, 2003

    2003

  42. [50]

    MacKerell, Donald Bashford, M

    Alexander D. MacKerell, Donald Bashford, M. Bellott, Roland L. Dunbrack, Jeffrey D. Evanseck, Martin J. Field, Stefan Fischer, Jiali Gao, Haipeng Guo, S. Ha, Diane Joseph-McCarthy, L. Kuch- nir, K. Kuczera, F. T. K. Lau, C. Mattos, S. Michnick, T. Ngo, D. T. Nguyen, B. Prodhom...

    1998

  43. [51]

    MacKerell

    Kenno Vanommeslaeghe, Olgun Guvench, and Alexander D. MacKerell. Molecular mechanics. Current Pharmaceutical Design, 20(20):3281–3292, 2014

    2014

  44. [52]

    Springer, 2014

    Ke-Li Han, Xin Zhang, and Ming-jun Yang.Protein conformational dynamics, volume 805. Springer, 2014

    2014

  45. [53]

    On the hamiltonian replica exchange method for efficient sampling of biomolecular systems: Application to protein structure prediction

    Hiroaki Fukunishi, Osamu Watanabe, and Shoji Takada. On the hamiltonian replica exchange method for efficient sampling of biomolecular systems: Application to protein structure prediction. The Journal of chemical physics, 116(20):9058–9067, 2002

    2002

  46. [54]

    Replica exchange with solute scaling: a more effi- cient version of replica exchange with solute tempering (rest2).The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 115(30):9431–9438, 2011

    Lingle Wang, Richard A Friesner, and BJ Berne. Replica exchange with solute scaling: a more effi- cient version of replica exchange with solute tempering (rest2).The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 115(30):9431–9438, 2011

    2011

  47. [55]

    Replica exchange with solute tempering: efficiency in large scale systems.The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 111(19):5405–5410, 2007

    Xuhui Huang, Morten Hagen, Byungchan Kim, Richard A Friesner, Ruhong Zhou, and Bruce J Berne. Replica exchange with solute tempering: efficiency in large scale systems.The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 111(19):5405–5410, 2007

    2007

  48. [56]

    Jernigan

    Sanzo Miyazawa and Robert L. Jernigan. Estimation of effective interresidue contact energies from protein crystal structures: quasi-chemical approximation.Macromolecules, 18(3):534–552, 1985

    1985

  49. [57]

    Fast procedure for reconstruction of full-atom protein models from reduced representations.Journal of Computational Chemistry, 29(9):1460–1465, 2008

    Piotr Rotkiewicz and Jeffrey Skolnick. Fast procedure for reconstruction of full-atom protein models from reduced representations.Journal of Computational Chemistry, 29(9):1460–1465, 2008

    2008

  50. [58]

    Robert D. Jr. Hills, Liang Lu, and Gregory A. Voth. Coffdrop: A coarse-grained nonbonded force field for proteins derived from all-atom explicit-solvent molecular dynamics simulations of amino acids.Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 10(11):5067–5083, 2014

    2014

  51. [59]

    Pettersen, Thomas D

    Eric F. Pettersen, Thomas D. Goddard, Conrad C. Huang, Elaine C. Meng, Gregory S. Couch, Tristan I. Croll, John H. Morris, and Thomas E. Ferrin. Ucsf chimerax: Structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers.Protein Science, 30(1):70–82, 2021. 23

    2021

  52. [60]

    Marenich, Christopher J

    Aleksandr V. Marenich, Christopher J. Cramer, and Donald G. Truhlar. Universal solvation model based on solute electron density and on a continuum model of the solvent defined by the bulk dielectric constant and atomic surface tensions.The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 113(...

    2009

  53. [61]

    Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with alphafold 3.Nature, 630(8016):493–500, 2024

    Josh Abramson, Aaron Adler, et al. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with alphafold 3.Nature, 630(8016):493–500, 2024

    2024

  54. [62]

    Phillips, David J

    James C. Phillips, David J. Hardy, Julio D. C. Maia, John E. Stone, Jo˜ ao V. Ribeiro, Rafael C. Bernardi, Ronak Buch, Giacomo Fiorin, J´ erˆ ome H´ enin, Wei Jiang, Ryan McGreevy, Marcelo C. R. Melo, Brian K. Radak, Robert D. Skeel, Abhishek Singharoy, Yi Wang, Benoˆ ıt Roux,...

    2020

  55. [63]

    Best, Xiao Zhu, Jihyun Shim, Pedro E

    Robert B. Best, Xiao Zhu, Jihyun Shim, Pedro E. M. Lopes, Jeetain Mittal, Michael Feig, and Alexander D. MacKerell Jr. Optimization of the additive charmm all-atom protein force field targeting improved sampling of the backbone phi, psi and side-chain chi1 and chi2 dihedral an...

    2012

  56. [64]

    Jorgensen, Jayaraman Chandrasekhar, Jeffry D

    William L. Jorgensen, Jayaraman Chandrasekhar, Jeffry D. Madura, Roger W. Impey, and Michael L. Klein. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 79(2):926–935, 1983

    1983

  57. [65]

    Particle mesh ewald: An n·log (n) method for ewald sums in large systems.The Journal of chemical physics, 98(12):10089–10092, 1993

    Tom Darden, Darrin York, and Lee Pedersen. Particle mesh ewald: An n·log (n) method for ewald sums in large systems.The Journal of chemical physics, 98(12):10089–10092, 1993

    1993

  58. [66]

    Schneider and E

    T. Schneider and E. Stoll. Molecular-dynamics study of a three-dimensional one-component model for distortive phase transitions.Physical Review B, 17(3):1302–1322, 1978

    1978

  59. [67]

    Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the amber ff99sb protein force field.Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 78(8):1950–1958, 2010

    Kresten Lindorff-Larsen, Stefano Piana, Kim Palmo, Paul Maragakis, John L Klepeis, Ron O Dror, and David E Shaw. Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the amber ff99sb protein force field.Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 78(8):1950–1958, 2010

    1950

  60. [68]

    Developing a molecular dynamics force field for both folded and disordered protein states.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(21):E4758–E4766, 2018

    Paul Robustelli, Stefano Piana, and David E Shaw. Developing a molecular dynamics force field for both folded and disordered protein states.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(21):E4758–E4766, 2018

    2018

  61. [69]

    Lincs: a linear constraint solver for molecular simulations.Journal of computational chemistry, 18(12):1463– 1472, 1997

    Berk Hess, Henk Bekker, Herman JC Berendsen, and Johannes GEM Fraaije. Lincs: a linear constraint solver for molecular simulations.Journal of computational chemistry, 18(12):1463– 1472, 1997

    1997

  62. [70]

    Wright.Numerical Optimization

    Jorge Nocedal and Stephen J. Wright.Numerical Optimization. Springer, New York, 2 edition, 2006

    2006

  63. [71]

    Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: A new molecular dynamics method.Journal of Applied Physics, 52(12):7182–7190, 1981

    Michele Parrinello and Aneesur Rahman. Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: A new molecular dynamics method.Journal of Applied Physics, 52(12):7182–7190, 1981

    1981

  64. [72]

    Jernigan

    Sanzo Miyazawa and Robert L. Jernigan. Residue–residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term and an unfavorable high packing density term, for simulation and threading.Journal of Molecular Biology, 256(3):623–644, 1996

    1996

  65. [73]

    Gallivan and Dennis A

    Justin P. Gallivan and Dennis A. Dougherty. Cation–πinteractions in structural biology.Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96(17):9459–9464, 1999. 24

    1999

Pith tools

Reviewed June 28, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.