Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Nested hyperedges promote the onset of collective transitions but suppress explosive behavior

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Nested hyperedges lower the onset of collective behavior and suppress explosive transitions in higher-order systems.

desk verdict Credible mean-field theory for how inter-order overlap lowers thresholds and can remove explosiveness, but the abstract oversells the scope beyond the M=2 regular case. read the letter →

arxiv 2601.10522 v2 pith:DITQ33H6 submitted 2026-01-15 physics.soc-ph

Federico Malizia , Andrés Guzmán , Federico Battiston , István Z. Kiss This is my paper
classification physics.soc-ph PACS 89.75.-k05.45.Xt
keywords higher-orderinteractionshypergraphsnestednessinter-orderoverlapepidemicthresholdbistabilityexplosivetransitionssynchronization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that the microscopic way higher-order interactions are arranged—specifically, whether three-body groups nest inside pairwise links—controls both when a collective state emerges and whether it emerges abruptly. For SIS contagion on regular hypergraphs, increasing the inter-order overlap alpha lowers the epidemic threshold, so spreading starts earlier, but it also raises the group infectivity needed for bistability and eventually turns the discontinuous transition continuous. The mechanism is a reallocation of transmission: overlap directs infection events into group-internal routes, making dyadic and triadic pathways redundant and quashing the nonlinear feedback that sustains explosive behavior. The same qualitative pattern appears in a higher-order synchronization model, suggesting the mechanism is not specific to contagion.

What carries the argument

The central object is the inter-order hyperedge overlap alpha, defined as the fraction of 1-cliques within 2-hyperedges, which interpolates between independent dyadic and triadic layers (alpha=0) and a fully nested simplicial structure (alpha=1). The theoretical engine is a homogeneous mean-field closure that tracks node, pair, and group densities and couples the two orders through the effective number of external links available to a node inside a group, k1-2alpha. This factor enters every pair and group equation and is what redirects transmission from external to internal routes; the nonlinear coefficient h from center-manifold reduction then encodes whether the transition is continuous or

What would settle it

In stochastic simulations on regular hypergraphs with fixed k1,k2 and controlled overlap alpha, measure the early-time quasi-stationary ratio rho_ISI^Delta/rho_SI just above the epidemic threshold. The paper predicts it is zero at alpha=0 and grows monotonically with alpha; if the measured ratio does not follow the predicted dependence (or does not increase), the claim that overlap promotes onset through internal group-embedded transmission is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a dual structural effect: the inter-order overlap alpha, the fraction of pairwise links embedded within 2-hyperedges, simultaneously anticipates the epidemic threshold and suppresses explosive transitions. An asymptotic expansion yields lambda*_1 approximately k1/(k1-1) - alpha*lambda2*k1^2/(k1-1)^3, so overlap lowers the onset through the product alpha*lambda2. A center-manifold reduction of the mean-field equations gives the normal form u' = h u^2 + z phi u, where the nonlinear coefficient h decreases monotonically with alpha for the studied parameters; beyond a critical alpha_c it becomes negative, converting a subcritical backward bifurcation into a supercritical

Load-bearing premise

The theory assumes the expected number of external links available to a node inside a 2-hyperedge is exactly k1-2alpha at every node and group; if the real conditional expectation in rewired hypergraphs deviates from this linear form, the predicted threshold shift, fast-variable ratios, and the sign of the bifurcation coefficient h could all be biased.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If nestedness is the control, then rewiring the pairwise layer of a hypergraph—without changing degrees or group sizes—can tune both the critical point and the type of transition.
  • In sparse higher-order networks, the suppression of explosive behavior is strongest: the required group infectivity for bistability rises sharply as k1 decreases.
  • The threshold shift is governed by the product alpha*lambda2, so weak group infectivity cannot produce a strong anticipation; moderate overlap only matters when group interactions are strong enough.
  • Systems that cannot avoid overlap, such as simplicial complexes, will generically show continuous transitions, while systems with independent layers are the candidates for explosive phenomena.
  • The phenomenology extends to synchronization: nested hyperedges lower the critical coupling for onset and shrink the bistable window there too.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The key modeling assumption—that the expected number of external links available to a node in a 2-hyperedge is exactly k1-2alpha for all nodes—is a global-to-local interpolation that the paper does not directly validate; a measurement of this conditional expectation in rewired regular hypergraphs would be a natural next step.
  • If the dual effect holds beyond the homogeneous setting, then degree heterogeneity and nestedness may interact nontrivially: hubs with many external links could counteract the suppression, a question the regular-graph theory cannot address.
  • The same reallocation mechanism suggests a testable prediction for empirical hypergraphs: systems with high measured overlap should exhibit smaller hysteresis areas and lower dynamical onsets than overlap-matched random configurations.
  • One could attempt to engineer the transition type by adding or removing internal links within groups, which is easier in practice than changing group sizes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies SIS contagion on regular hypergraphs with pairwise and three-body interactions, parameterized by the inter-order overlap α. It develops a homogeneous mean-field model tracking node, pair, and group densities, closes it with standard factorizations, and analyzes the epidemic threshold and the nature of the bifurcation via center-manifold reduction. The central claim is that increasing nestedness (α) lowers the epidemic onset λ1* while simultaneously raising the threshold λ̂2 required for bistability, thus turning explosive transitions into continuous ones. Supporting evidence includes asymptotic and numerical analysis of the mean-field system, fast-variable decompositions identifying internal pairwise transmission as the driver of the early onset, and Gillespie simulations on rewired regular hypergraphs for selected parameters. The supplementary material extends the phenomenology to higher-order Kuramoto dynamics.

Significance. If the dual effect is robust, the paper identifies a concrete structural mechanism—inter-order nestedness—by which higher-order interactions control both the onset of collective behavior and the continuity of the transition. This would be a useful contribution to the growing literature on higher-order contagion and synchronization. The paper's strengths include a closed mean-field system with no fitted parameters, an explicit center-manifold reduction, a fast-variable mechanistic decomposition, and direct Gillespie validation for several observables. The main significance is conditional on the validity of the structural interpolation k1−2α, which is the key modeling assumption and is not independently tested. The claims of universality ('groups of any size', Ising dynamics) also go beyond what is demonstrated.

major comments (3)
  1. [Modeling nestedness / Appendix A, Eq. (10)] The factor k1−2α is the structural lever of the entire theory. It is introduced as a linear interpolation between α=0 and α=1, but the global overlap α does not by itself determine the conditional expected number of external links available to a node inside a given 2-hyperedge in the rewired ensembles; correlations between the two internal slots, shared links between overlapping hyperedges, and the finite degree k1 can all modify this count. This factor enters every pair/group equation, the fast-variable expressions in Eq. (7), the threshold in Eq. (2), and the center-manifold coefficient h in Eq. (13). The paper validates final observables (ρ*, fast variables) for a few cases, but does not directly measure whether the empirical number of external links per group context equals k1−2α. If the actual conditional count differs, the predicted lowering of λ1* and the monotone decrease of h co
  2. [Fig. 2(a) and §'Nested hyperedges promote...'] The central claim that h decreases monotonically with α and that a critical α_c exists is demonstrated only for k1=5, k2=2 and λ2∈{1,2,3,4}. For λ2=4, h remains positive over the whole α range, so the suppression of bistability is not universal but parameter-dependent. Moreover, h is computed from a closure-dependent mean-field system and is not directly validated by simulations; the curves of λ̂2(α) in Fig. 2(b) are theoretical, and the simulation-based phase boundaries are only shown for a few α values in Fig. 2(d). To make the dual-effect claim quantitative, please provide more parameter sweeps (e.g., different k1, k2) and, if possible, compare the predicted λ̂2(α) with directly measured bistability boundaries in simulations.
  3. [Abstract and Conclusions] The abstract states that the phenomenology 'holds for groups of any size' and mentions higher-order Ising dynamics, but the model and simulations treat only 2-hyperedges (size-3 groups), and the supplementary material reports only Kuramoto dynamics, not Ising. These generality claims are unsupported by the presented evidence. Please either remove them or provide a concrete argument or additional simulations for larger group sizes and for Ising dynamics.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 2(a)] The vertical axis label in Fig. 2(a) reads 'Nonlinear coefficient a' while the text and Eq. (3) use h. Please make the notation consistent.
  2. [SM Section III] The bound 'k1 ≤ (k2−1)(k2−2)/2' for admissible fully nested configurations is inconsistent with the parameters k1=5, k2=2 used throughout the main text. This looks like a typo; please correct it (probably k2 ≤ k1(k1−1)/2 or similar).
  3. [Eq. (2)] Please state the validity regime of the small-α asymptotic expansion (e.g., αλ2 small) and, for completeness, compare its predictions with the exact threshold from Eq. (12) in a figure or in the text.
  4. [SM Section II] The derivation of the fast variables refers to Eq. (??) in the main text; the placeholder should be resolved. Also ensure δ̄ vs δ notation is consistently defined.
  5. [References] Ref. [17] is an arXiv preprint; if a journal version exists, please cite it instead or as well.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Self-contained mean-field derivation with independent simulation validation; mild definitional circularity where the k1−2α interpolation is restated as the microscopic mechanism.

  1. self definitional [Main text, 'Modeling nestedness in higher-order contagion' (paragraph beginning 'A key consequence of overlap...'); operationalized in Appendix A Eq. (10) via (k1−2α) and 2α factors.]
    "We model intermediate overlap by interpolating between these extremes, yielding an effective number of external links available to a node within a group context, (1−α)k1+α(k1−2)=k1−2α, which is the structural lever through which nestedness couples pair and group motifs."

    The paper presents 'overlap redirects transmission from external links to internal, group-embedded routes' as a discovered mechanism, but the redistribution is exactly the interpolated factor k1−2α defined here. Every internal/external split in the equations (2α vs k1−2α) and later claims such as 'high overlap both reduces the pool of external links (through k1−2α)' restate this input. Thus the mechanism narrative is definitional, not derived. The quantitative predictions (Eq. 2, sign of h) are nevertheless derived from the full system and checked against independent Gillespie simulations, so the circularity is localized and mild.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained: the closed mean-field equations (10) are written from explicit state variables and stated closures; the epidemic threshold follows from the Jacobian of that system (Eq. 12), with the small-α expansion in Eq. (2) being a derived consequence rather than a fit; the bifurcation type is computed via the standard center-manifold coefficient h in Eq. (13); and the fast-variable expressions in Eq. (7) are obtained from the same equations. No parameter is fitted to the simulation output, and the theory is checked against Gillespie simulations on rewired regular hypergraphs, which are independent of the mean-field equations. The self-citations appearing in the text (e.g., Refs. [13,15]) are corroborative or methodological, not load-bearing: the equations and closures are reproduced in the paper itself. The only mildly circular element is the k1−2α interpolation: the model chooses this linear form to encode how overlap consumes internal links, and the later mechanistic claim that nestedness shifts transmission from external to internal routes largely restates that choice. Because the central quantitative results (onset shift and suppression of bistability) are derived from the full nonlinear system and validated against independent simulations, this does not undermine the main claim; it only makes part of the explanatory narrative definitional.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivation rests on standard mean-field closures plus one paper-specific modeling choice (k1 − 2α) that is not an independently validated microscopic law. No parameters are fitted to data; all quantities are model inputs or derived from the model equations. No new entities are postulated.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Factorized mean-field closures for composite motifs (Eq. 11).
    Higher-order composite densities are replaced by products of lower-order densities, e.g., ρSSSΔI = ρSSSΔ ρSI/ρS. This is the standard closure that makes the system closed and directly shapes all numerical predictions.
  • domain assumption No closed triples of links and negligible intra-order overlap among distinct 2-hyperedges.
    Stated 'for tractability' before Eq. (10); removes pairwise clustering and same-order overlap while preserving cross-order α. The authors acknowledge that at large α this introduces discrepancies with simulations.
  • ad hoc to paper Linear interpolation k1 − 2α for the expected number of external links of a node inside a 2-hyperedge.
    This is the main coupling between pairwise and group channels. It is not derived from local conditional statistics and is assumed to hold uniformly across nodes and groups. It enters every pair and group evolution equation.
  • domain assumption Fast-variable quasi-stationary approximation for ratios Π, δ, Ψ near the disease-free state.
    Used to derive Eqs. (6)-(7) and the fast-variable system in Appendix C; assumes pair and group ratios relax much faster than the infected density.
  • standard math Center-manifold reduction with a simple zero eigenvalue and z > 0 at criticality.
    The normal form ˙u = h u^2 + z φ u follows from standard center-manifold theory; the claim z > 0 is asserted and used to determine bifurcation direction by the sign of h.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nested hyperedges promote the onset of collective transitions but suppress explosive behavior." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DITQ33H6

@misc{pith2026260110522,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nested hyperedges promote the onset of collective transitions but suppress explosive behavior},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DITQ33H6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2601.10522}
}
read the original abstract

Higher-order interactions can induce abrupt collective transitions, yet the microscopic mechanisms controlling macroscopic critical behavior remain unclear. Here we show that nested hyperedges generate a dual effect on dynamical processes: they promote the onset of collective behavior while suppressing the explosive transitions driven by higher-order feedback. To uncover the mechanism, we develop an analytically tractable theory of contagion on hypergraphs that explicitly tracks nestedness between groups of different sizes, allowing us to identify the microscopic mechanism responsible for this dual behavior. By disentangling contagion pathways, we find that nestedness redirects transmission from external links to internal, group-embedded routes -- boosting early activation but making dyadic and triadic channels increasingly redundant. This loss of structural independence quenches the nonlinear amplification required for bistability, progressively smoothing the transition as hyperedges become nested. The phenomenology holds for groups of any size, and is not specific to spreading dynamics but also emerges in higher-order Ising and Kuramoto dynamics. Overall, our results identify nestedness between group interactions as a general structural mechanism governing critical transitions in complex systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.10522 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) compares these theoretical predictions, ob￾tained by numerically integrating the fast-variable equations (Appendix), with the corresponding estimates from Gillespie simulations, including the disentangled contributions. We es￾timate Π¯ and ¯δ in Gillespie simulations by initializing with a single infected node close to λ ∗ 1 and averaging over 5000 realizations in the early-time window 0.005 < ρI (t) < 0.01. The… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A principled closure framework for higher-order SIS epidemic models on networks

    physics.soc-ph 2026-07 accept novelty 8.0 of 10

    A topology-aware closure operator derives three existing higher-order SIS models from exact microscopic equations and reveals hidden assumptions in the inter-order overlap model.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Networks beyond pairwise interactions: Struc- ture and dynamics.Physics reports, 874:1–92, 2020

    Federico Battiston, Giulia Cencetti, Iacopo Iacopini, Vito La- tora, Maxime Lucas, Alice Patania, Jean-Gabriel Young, and Giovanni Petri. Networks beyond pairwise interactions: Struc- ture and dynamics.Physics reports, 874:1–92, 2020

    2020

  2. [2]

    The physics of higher-order interactions in complex systems

    Federico Battiston, Enrico Amico, Alain Barrat, Ginestra Bian- coni, Guilherme Ferraz de Arruda, Benedetta Franceschiello, Iacopo Iacopini, Sonia K ´efi, Vito Latora, Yamir Moreno, et al. The physics of higher-order interactions in complex systems. Nature physics, 17(10):1093–1098, 2021

    2021

  3. [3]

    Simplicial models of social contagion.Nature communications, 10(1):2485, 2019

    Iacopo Iacopini, Giovanni Petri, Alain Barrat, and Vito Latora. Simplicial models of social contagion.Nature communications, 10(1):2485, 2019

    2019

  4. [4]

    Multistability, intermittency, and hybrid transitions in social contagion models on hypergraphs

    Guilherme Ferraz de Arruda, Giovanni Petri, Pablo Martin Ro- driguez, and Yamir Moreno. Multistability, intermittency, and hybrid transitions in social contagion models on hypergraphs. Nature communications, 14(1):1375, 2023

    2023

  5. [5]

    Higher order interac- tions in complex networks of phase oscillators promote abrupt synchronization switching.Communications Physics, 3(1):218, 2020

    Per Sebastian Skardal and Alex Arenas. Higher order interac- tions in complex networks of phase oscillators promote abrupt synchronization switching.Communications Physics, 3(1):218, 2020

    2020

  6. [6]

    Explosive cooperation in social dilemmas on higher-order networks.Physical Review Letters, 132(16):167401, 2024

    Andrea Civilini, Onkar Sadekar, Federico Battiston, Jes ´us G´omez-Garde˜nes, and Vito Latora. Explosive cooperation in social dilemmas on higher-order networks.Physical Review Letters, 132(16):167401, 2024

    2024

  7. [7]

    Higher-order ising model on hy- pergraphs.Physical Review E, 112(2):L022301, 2025

    Thomas Robiglio, Leonardo Di Gaetano, Ada Altieri, Giovanni Petri, and Federico Battiston. Higher-order ising model on hy- pergraphs.Physical Review E, 112(2):L022301, 2025

    2025

  8. [8]

    A universal route to ex- plosive phenomena.Science advances, 7(16):eabe3824, 2021

    Christian Kuehn and Christian Bick. A universal route to ex- plosive phenomena.Science advances, 7(16):eabe3824, 2021

    2021

Show all 34 references
  1. [9]

    Social polarization promoted by sparse higher- order interactions.Communications Physics, 2025

    Hugo P ´erez-Mart´ınez, Santiago Lamata-Ot ´ın, Federico Mal- izia, Luis Mario Flor ´ıa, Jes ´us G ´omez-Garde˜nes, and David Soriano-Pa˜nos. Social polarization promoted by sparse higher- order interactions.Communications Physics, 2025

    2025

  2. [10]

    Higher-order interactions shape collective dynamics differently in hypergraphs and simplicial complexes.Nature communica- tions, 14(1):1605, 2023

    Yuanzhao Zhang, Maxime Lucas, and Federico Battiston. Higher-order interactions shape collective dynamics differently in hypergraphs and simplicial complexes.Nature communica- tions, 14(1):1605, 2023

    2023

  3. [11]

    Hyperedge overlap drives explosive transitions in systems with higher-order interactions

    Federico Malizia, Santiago Lamata-Ot ´ın, Mattia Frasca, Vito Latora, and Jes ´us G´omez-Garde˜nes. Hyperedge overlap drives explosive transitions in systems with higher-order interactions. Nature communications, 16(1):555, 2025

    2025

  4. [12]

    Hyperedge overlap drives synchronizability of systems with higher-order interac- tions.Physical Review E, 111(3):034302, 2025

    Santiago Lamata-Ot ´ın, Federico Malizia, Vito Latora, Mat- tia Frasca, and Jes ´us G ´omez-Garde˜nes. Hyperedge overlap drives synchronizability of systems with higher-order interac- tions.Physical Review E, 111(3):034302, 2025

    2025

  5. [13]

    Triadic ap- proximation reveals the role of interaction overlap on the spread of complex contagions on higher-order networks.Physical Re- view Letters, 132(7):077401, 2024

    Giulio Burgio, Sergio G ´omez, and Alex Arenas. Triadic ap- proximation reveals the role of interaction overlap on the spread of complex contagions on higher-order networks.Physical Re- view Letters, 132(7):077401, 2024

    2024

  6. [14]

    Contagion dynamics on hypergraphs with nested hyperedges.Physical Review E, 108(3):034313, 2023

    Jihye Kim, Deok-Sun Lee, and K-I Goh. Contagion dynamics on hypergraphs with nested hyperedges.Physical Review E, 108(3):034313, 2023

    2023

  7. [15]

    Disentangling the role of heterogeneity and hyperedge overlap in explosive contagion on higher-order net- works.Physical Review Letters, 135(20):207401, 2025

    Federico Malizia, Andr ´es Guzm ´an, Iacopo Iacopini, and Istv´an Z Kiss. Disentangling the role of heterogeneity and hyperedge overlap in explosive contagion on higher-order net- works.Physical Review Letters, 135(20):207401, 2025

    2025

  8. [16]

    The effect of hetero- geneity on hypergraph contagion models.Chaos: An Interdis- ciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 30(10), 2020

    Nicholas W Landry and Juan G Restrepo. The effect of hetero- geneity on hypergraph contagion models.Chaos: An Interdis- ciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 30(10), 2020

    2020

  9. [17]

    Loops, not groups: Long cycles are responsible for discontinuous phase transitions in higher-order network contagions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.15688, 2025

    Leah A Keating and Laurent H ˜AˇSbert-Dufresne. Loops, not groups: Long cycles are responsible for discontinuous phase transitions in higher-order network contagions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.15688, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Higher-order motif analysis in hypergraphs.Communications Physics, 5(1):79, 2022

    Quintino Francesco Lotito, Federico Musciotto, Alberto Mon- tresor, and Federico Battiston. Higher-order motif analysis in hypergraphs.Communications Physics, 5(1):79, 2022

    2022

  11. [19]

    The simpliciality of higher-order networks.EPJ data science, 13(1):17, 2024

    Nicholas W Landry, Jean-Gabriel Young, and Nicole Eikmeier. The simpliciality of higher-order networks.EPJ data science, 13(1):17, 2024

    2024

  12. [20]

    Encapsulation struc- ture and dynamics in hypergraphs.Journal of Physics: Com- plexity, 4(4):045007, 2023

    Timothy LaRock and Renaud Lambiotte. Encapsulation struc- ture and dynamics in hypergraphs.Journal of Physics: Com- plexity, 4(4):045007, 2023

    2023

  13. [21]

    Struc- tural reducibility of hypergraphs.Physical Review Letters, 135(24):247401, 2025

    Alec Kirkley, Helcio Felippe, and Federico Battiston. Struc- tural reducibility of hypergraphs.Physical Review Letters, 135(24):247401, 2025

    2025

  14. [22]

    A pair-based approxima- tion for simplicial contagion.Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 199:116776, 2025

    Federico Malizia, Luca Gallo, Mattia Frasca, Istv ´an Z Kiss, Vito Latora, and Giovanni Russo. A pair-based approxima- tion for simplicial contagion.Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 199:116776, 2025

    2025

  15. [23]

    The effects of local spatial structure on epidemiological invasions.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London

    Matthew J Keeling. The effects of local spatial structure on epidemiological invasions.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 266(1421):859–867, 1999

    1999

  16. [24]

    Mathemat- ics of epidemics on networks.Cham: Springer, 598(2017):31, 2017

    Istv ´an Z Kiss, Joel C Miller, P ´eter L Simon, et al. Mathemat- ics of epidemics on networks.Cham: Springer, 598(2017):31, 2017

    2017

  17. [25]

    A motif-based approach to network epidemics.Bul- 8 letin of Mathematical Biology, 71(7):1693–1706, 2009

    Thomas House, Geoffrey Davies, Leon Danon, and Matt J Keeling. A motif-based approach to network epidemics.Bul- 8 letin of Mathematical Biology, 71(7):1693–1706, 2009

    2009

  18. [26]

    Dynamical mod- els of tuberculosis and their applications.Math

    Carlos Castillo-Chavez and Baojun Song. Dynamical mod- els of tuberculosis and their applications.Math. Biosci. Eng, 1(2):361–404, 2004

    2004

  19. [27]

    Springer, 1998

    Yuri A Kuznetsov.Elements of applied bifurcation theory. Springer, 1998

    1998

  20. [28]

    Spread of infectious disease through clus- tered populations.Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 6(41):1121–1134, 2009

    Joel C Miller. Spread of infectious disease through clus- tered populations.Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 6(41):1121–1134, 2009

    2009

  21. [29]

    Percolation and epidemics in random clustered networks.Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 80(2):020901, 2009

    Joel C Miller. Percolation and epidemics in random clustered networks.Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 80(2):020901, 2009

    2009

  22. [30]

    Abrupt desynchroniza- tion and extensive multistability in globally coupled oscillator simplexes.Physical review letters, 122(24):248301, 2019

    Per Sebastian Skardal and Alex Arenas. Abrupt desynchroniza- tion and extensive multistability in globally coupled oscillator simplexes.Physical review letters, 122(24):248301, 2019

    2019

  23. [31]

    Epidemic threshold in pairwise models for clus- tered networks: closures and fast correlations.Journal of math- ematical biology, 79(3):823–860, 2019

    Rosanna C Barnard, Luc Berthouze, P ´eter L Simon, and Istv´an Z Kiss. Epidemic threshold in pairwise models for clus- tered networks: closures and fast correlations.Journal of math- ematical biology, 79(3):823–860, 2019

    2019

  24. [32]

    First order phase transitions and the thermodynamic limit.New Journal of Physics, 21(12):123021, 2019

    Uwe Thiele, Tobias Frohoff-H ¨ulsmann, Sebastian Engelnkem- per, Edgar Knobloch, and Andrew J Archer. First order phase transitions and the thermodynamic limit.New Journal of Physics, 21(12):123021, 2019

    2019

  25. [33]

    real gap

    Juan A Acebr ´on, Luis L Bonilla, Conrad J P´erez Vicente, F´elix Ritort, and Renato Spigler. The kuramoto model: A simple paradigm for synchronization phenomena.Reviews of modern physics, 77(1):137, 2005. 9 Supplemental Material for: Nested hyperedges promote the onset of col...

    2005

  26. [34]

    (??) in the main text

    Solving forρ ISI∆ /ρSI gives the quasi-stationary value ¯δ≡ ρISI∆ ρSI = αk2λ∗2 1 (k1 −2α) k1 k1k2 −αλ ∗ 1λ2(k2 −1) , which coincides with Eq. (??) in the main text. This expression immediately implies ¯δ= 0forα= 0, i.e., triadic transmission does not contribute at early times ...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.