pith. sign in

arxiv: 1509.08947 · v1 · pith:DJ5GIOVSnew · submitted 2015-09-29 · 🧮 math.LO

Remark 3.4 A Dedekind Finite Borel Set

classification 🧮 math.LO
keywords mathremarkbolyaiborelbudapestdedekindfinitearch
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Asaf Karagila pointed out that Remark 3.4 [1], directly contradicts Theorem 3.3 (c) [2] which was incorrectly stated. This note contains a proof of this remark. [1] Miller, Arnold W.; A Dedekind Finite Borel Set, Arch. Math. Logic 50 (2011), no. 1-2, 1--17. [2] Kanamori, A.; Pincus, D.; Does GCH imply AC locally?, Paul Erdos and his mathematics, II (Budapest, 1999), 413-426, Bolyai Soc. Math. Stud., 11, Janos Bolyai Math. Soc., Budapest, 2002.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.