Remark 3.4 A Dedekind Finite Borel Set
classification
🧮 math.LO
keywords
mathremarkbolyaiborelbudapestdedekindfinitearch
read the original abstract
Asaf Karagila pointed out that Remark 3.4 [1], directly contradicts Theorem 3.3 (c) [2] which was incorrectly stated. This note contains a proof of this remark. [1] Miller, Arnold W.; A Dedekind Finite Borel Set, Arch. Math. Logic 50 (2011), no. 1-2, 1--17. [2] Kanamori, A.; Pincus, D.; Does GCH imply AC locally?, Paul Erdos and his mathematics, II (Budapest, 1999), 413-426, Bolyai Soc. Math. Stud., 11, Janos Bolyai Math. Soc., Budapest, 2002.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.