Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 60 references

Investigating Phosphorus Abundances in a Sample of APOGEE-2 Bulge Globular Clusters

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that moderately phosphorus-enhanced stars appear in two of seven bulge globular clusters, and that these stars are also nitrogen-rich, suggesting they are second-generation cluster stars.

desk verdict Plausible but fragile detection of P-enhanced stars in two bulge GCs; the headline counts don't reproduce from their own Table 1. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.11207 v1 pith:DJ6EK5YU submitted 2025-09-14 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.GA

Beatriz Barbuy , José G. Fernández-Trincado , Morgan S. Camargo , Doug Geisler , Maren Brauner , Sandro Villanova , Dante Minniti , Domingo Anibal García-Hernández
show 4 more authors
Stefano O. Souza Heitor Ernandes Amâncio Friaça Marco Pignatari
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.GA
keywords phosphorusabundancesglobularclustersGalacticbulgeAPOGEE-2second-generationstarsnear-infraredspectroscopystellarnucleosynthesisnitrogenenhancement
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the detection of moderately phosphorus-enhanced stars in two of seven old globular clusters in the Galactic bulge: Tonantzintla 1 and NGC 6316. In these clusters, more than half of the analyzed stars show [P/Fe] between +0.5 and +1.0, similar to the moderate enhancements seen in bulge field stars. The authors find that every P-rich star in this sample is also nitrogen-rich, which they take as a hint that phosphorus enhancement is linked to the second-generation stellar populations common in globular clusters. The result matters because it may explain the puzzling existence of phosphorus-rich field stars in the inner Galaxy and constrain which stars produce phosphorus.

What carries the argument

The analysis rests on spectrum synthesis of the P I 16482.932 Å line in the H-band, which is blended with CO molecular lines. The authors re-derive C, N, O abundances to model the CO blending, and they check the weaker P I 15711.622 Å line where available. The key interpretive tool is the observed P-N correlation, used to connect P-enhancement to the multiple-population phenomenon in globular clusters.

What would settle it

Obtain higher signal-to-noise spectra of the Ton 1 and NGC 6316 stars and measure [P/Fe] from an independent phosphorus line, or re-analyze with a fully consistent non-LTE treatment; if the excesses drop below +0.5 for most stars, the claim of P-rich stars in these clusters is overturned.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Using H-band spectra from the APOGEE-2 survey, the authors measure [P/Fe] from the P I 16482.932 Å line in stars of seven bulge globular clusters with metallicities near [Fe/H] ~ -1. They find that more than half of the analyzed stars in Tonantzintla 1 (7 of 12) and NGC 6316 (6 of 10) show moderate phosphorus enhancement in the range +0.5 < [P/Fe] < +1.0, while the other five clusters show no such enhancement. All P-rich stars in this sample also are nitrogen-rich, consistent with the pattern expected for second-generation stars in globular clusters, though no robust correlations with other second-generation indicators such as Al or Mg are found.

Load-bearing premise

The detection of moderate phosphorus enhancement rests on a single P I line whose strength changes by up to 0.3 dex with a 100 K change in stellar temperature, so stars with [P/Fe] between 0.5 and 0.8 could be ordinary if the CO blending is misjudged.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If P-rich stars are indeed second-generation cluster stars, then some fraction of field P-rich stars could have been ejected from globular clusters.
  • The presence of P enrichment in two old clusters argues against nova or AGB polluters as the source, favoring massive stars as the main producers of P in these environments.
  • The absence of P-rich stars in five clusters of similar metallicity suggests the phenomenon is not universal and may depend on cluster mass or formation history.
  • Confirmation of the P-N connection would give a new chemical tag for identifying second-generation stars in integrated-light or low-resolution studies.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the P-N correlation survives larger samples, P could serve as a cleaner tracer of pollution from massive stars than N alone, which is affected by multiple processes.
  • The fact that not all N-rich stars are P-rich suggests a threshold or a distinct sub-population among second-generation stars; quantifying the P/N ratio may separate nucleosynthetic origins.
  • A direct test: search for P-enhanced stars in the field with orbits consistent with disrupted bulge clusters; if found, it would confirm the ejection scenario.
  • The parameter sensitivity of the P I line (up to 0.3 dex for 100 K) implies that some of the claimed moderate enhancements could be due to systematic temperature errors; measuring P in stars with T_eff < 4000 K where CO blending is stronger requires careful treatment.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper derives phosphorus abundances for stars in seven bulge globular clusters (Ton 1, NGC 6316, Ton 2, HP 1, NGC 6522, NGC 6558, UKS 1) using APOGEE-2 H-band spectra and spectral synthesis with TURBOSPECTRUM. The analysis relies on the P I 16482.932 Å line, corrected for CO blending using revised C, N, and O abundances, and on the shallower 15711.622 Å line as a consistency check. The authors report moderate P enhancement ([P/Fe] >~ +0.5) in two clusters, Ton 1 (7 of 12 stars) and NGC 6316 (6 of 10 stars), and find that all P-rich stars also tend to be N-rich, which they interpret as a possible second-generation globular-cluster origin. No P enhancement is found in the other five clusters. Results are compared with literature samples and with the authors' own chemical evolution models, with the conclusion that the origin of P-rich stars remains open.

Significance. If the detection is robust, this is the first evidence of P-moderately enhanced stars in multiple bulge globular clusters and strengthens the connection between the P-rich phenomenon and globular-cluster multiple populations. The non-detections in five similar clusters also provide constraints on the nucleosynthetic sources. The study makes use of public APOGEE-2 data and includes a careful revision of CNO abundances, explicit cross-checks between two stellar-parameter sets, and a dedicated uncertainty appendix. However, the central claim rests on a single P I line with no NLTE corrections, and the quoted P-rich threshold of 0.5 dex is comparable to the estimated parameter-induced uncertainties (up to 0.3 dex). The counts of P-rich stars in Table 1 are not reproducible as stated, so the significance of the detection and of the P-N correlation is currently not established to the standard implied by the abstract.

major comments (3)
  1. [Table 1 and §3] The stated numbers of P-rich stars do not follow from the table. For NGC 6316, the text claims 6 P-rich stars ([P/Fe]>0.5), but only 4 of the 10 rows (2M17163864-2809385, 2M17163330-2808396, 2M17164482-2808302, 2M17163903-2807212) have [P/Fe]>0.5 under either the literature or the ASPCAP parameter set. For Ton 1, the '7 of 12' count matches only the ASPCAP parameter set, while the text says the photometric/literature parameters are adopted. Please specify the adopted parameter set, list final per-star [P/Fe] values with that set, report per-star uncertainties, and recompute the counts; the current presentation makes the central detection irreproducible.
  2. [§3 and Appendix A] The [P/Fe]>0.5 threshold is close to the derived uncertainty. Appendix A reports that ΔTeff=100 K can shift [P/Fe] by up to 0.3 dex for stars near Teff~3900 K, with a total uncertainty of 0.25 dex for the example star. Several stars classified as P-rich cross the threshold between the two parameter sets, e.g., Ton1 2M17342921-3904514 (+0.60 vs +0.25), Ton1 2M17343521-3903091 (+0.80 vs +0.40), and Ton1 2M17342541-3902338 (+0.40 vs +0.80). Because the conclusion that 'all P-rich stars tend to also be N-rich' depends on this classification, the paper should quantify the robustness of the P-rich/N-rich correlation to these parameter-induced shifts, or restrict the claim to stars that remain P-rich under both parameter sets.
  3. [Appendix A and §5] The single P I 16482.932 Å line is blended with CO and no NLTE corrections are available; this is explicitly acknowledged as a vulnerability. Given this, the abstract and conclusions currently present the detection as a definite result. I recommend softening the claim (e.g., 'tentative' or 'moderate' enhancement) and propagating the systematic error budget from the CO/CNO revision and the choice of stellar parameters into the quoted [P/Fe] values and into the cluster-level counts. This is load-bearing because the paper's novel contribution is the detection itself; without propagated systematics, the significance of the 0.5–0.8 dex enhancements is not established.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table 1] The column header in the table reads '(19)' for the [P/Fe] column; this should be '(10)'.
  2. [Abstract] The cluster name 'NGC 6316_' includes a stray underscore in the abstract; please remove it.
  3. [§5] The sentence 'In five of them, namely NGC 6522, NGC 6558, UKS 1, and Ton 2, (and possibly HP 1)' lists four clusters by name plus HP 1, so the phrasing is ambiguous; please revise to make the total count clear.
  4. [Appendix A] In the sentence 'higher P abundances are found for stars with T eff ¿ 4000 K', the symbol '¿' should be '>'.
  5. [References and text] There are minor typographical issues, e.g., an extra bracket after 'Roberti et al. 2025)]' in §4.2 and 'it is still matter or debate' in §5 should read 'matter of debate'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the P abundances are measured from spectra, not derived from the claims they support.

full rationale

Score 0. The paper's central result is an observed abundance ratio derived from APOGEE-2 spectra via TURBOSPECTRUM spectral synthesis, using atomic data from the APOGEE collaboration and solar abundances from Asplund et al. (2021). The [P/Fe] values are not fitted to the conclusion: no parameter is adjusted to force the claimed P-rich detections, and the comparison with Barbuy et al. (2025) chemical evolution models is explicitly illustrative, with the models themselves not reproducing the P-excess (the paper states the models 'predict a maximum [P/Fe]=+0.45' and 'still leave unexplained the P-excess'). Self-citations to Fernández-Trincado et al. for cluster stellar parameters and to earlier P-rich star papers supply input parameters and context, but the detection claim depends on the line synthesis, not on those citations. Appendix A's admission that the single P I 16482.932 Å line is a vulnerability and that ΔTeff=100 K can shift [P/Fe] by up to 0.3 dex is an uncertainty/robustness limitation, not a circularity: the abundance is still measured from the spectrum. The P-N correlation is an empirical comparison of independently derived abundances, and the claimed 'detection' is a threshold applied to measured values rather than a prediction forced by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on standard spectral synthesis assumptions and adopted line data from the APOGEE collaboration. The only hand-chosen number affecting the central claim is the P-rich threshold. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • P-rich threshold = +0.5 dex
    Hand-chosen classification threshold used to define P-rich stars; it matches the moderate enhancement range in field stars, and the choice determines which stars count as detections. Some stars with [P/Fe]=0.4 are excluded.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption LTE is valid for the P I lines; no NLTE corrections are available
    The paper states no published NLTE corrections exist (Appendix A), so the synthetic spectra assume LTE. If NLTE effects are strong for P I at these cool temperatures, the derived [P/Fe] could shift by more than the quoted uncertainty.
  • domain assumption The adopted P I oscillator strengths (log gf = -0.510, -0.273) from the APOGEE-2 collaboration are correct
    Section 3 adopts these values without independent verification; an error in gf shifts all P abundances.
  • domain assumption The revised C, N, O abundances properly model the CO/CN molecular blending of the P I 16482.932 A line
    Section 3 and Appendix A describe how CO lines affect the P line; if the revised CNO values are biased, the P abundance is biased, and the P-N correlation could be partly artificial.
  • domain assumption The sample stars are genuine members of the target globular clusters
    Membership is taken from prior literature studies (Fernandez-Trincado et al. 2021; Frelijj et al. 2025); field contamination would weaken the cluster-level conclusions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Investigating Phosphorus Abundances in a Sample of APOGEE-2 Bulge Globular Clusters." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DJ6EK5YU

@misc{pith2026250911207,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Investigating Phosphorus Abundances in a Sample of APOGEE-2 Bulge Globular Clusters},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DJ6EK5YU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.11207}
}
read the original abstract

Phosphorus enhanced (P-rich; [P/Fe] > 0.8) giants have been found among mildly metal-poor fiels stars, but in only one star in a globular cluster (GC), M4 (NGC 6121). Also, in a sample of bulge spheroid stars, some of them showed a moderate P-enhancement in the range +0.5 < [P/Fe] < +1.0. In this paper we derive the P abundance of moderately metal-poor ([Fe/H] ~-1) GC stars, aiming to check if the phenomenon could be related to the unusual multiple stellar populations found in most GCs. Here we present the detection of P-moderately enhanced stars among two out of seven bulge GCs (Tonantzintla 1, and NGC 6316_, with metallicities similar to those of the bulge field P-rich stars. Using H-band high-resolution (R~22,500) spectra from the APOGEE-2 survey, we present the first high-resolution abundance analysis of [P/Fe] from the PI 16482.932 A line in a sample of selected bulge GCs. We find that all P-rich stars tend to also be N-rich, that hints at the origin of P-rich stars as second-generation stars in GCs. However no other correlations of P and other elements are found, that are usually indicators of second-generation stars. Further studies with larger samples and comparisons with field stars will be needed before any firm conclusions are drawn.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.11207 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. P I 16482.932 ˚A line in 4 stars in Ton 1 (rows 1 and 2 ) and NGC 6316 (rows 3 and 4 ), fitted with synthetic spectra computed with [P/Fe]= 0.0 (green), 1.0 (blue, and final values (red) if different from 0.0 or 1.0. Synthetic spectra computed with molecular lines only are shown as dotted lines. parameters, as well as from our derivations of C, N and O, using all of the above parameters, as can be seen in [PITH_FUL… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. [P/Fe] vs. [N/O] (upper panel) and [Al/Fe] vs. [N/O] (lower panel) for Ton 1 (green squares) and NGC 6316 (red squares). as well. It is unclear if this difference between our present results and field P-rich stars is real, or it is just due to the small stellar sample currently available from GCs. Nevertheless, our stellar data in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. [P/Fe] vs. [Fe/H] for the present results compared with literature data. Symbols – darkgreen-open stars: present work, red-filled circles: Caffau et al. (2011), red- open circles: Caffau et al. (2016), blue-filled triangles: Roederer et al. (2014), filled-cyan circles + open-black circles: Maas et al. (2019), light grey-filled circles: Nandakumar et al. (2022), light grey open 4-side stars: Maas et al. (2022), red-o… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: [P/Fe] vs. Teff and [P/Fe] vs. log g, for stellar parameters from references cited in the text, and ASPCAP parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: PI lines and CO lines in star Ton1: 2M17343616-3903344 for stellar parameters from Fern´andez-Trincado et al. (2021c) and ASPCAP parameters, with Teff = 3890 K and 3982 K, respectively. CO lines intensity changes more dramatically in the temperature range. Allende Prie…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2022, ApJS, 259, 35, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac4414

    Abdurro’uf, Accetta, K., Aerts, C., et al. 2022, ApJS, 259, 35, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac4414

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac4414 2022

  2. [2]

    2020, ApJS, 249, 3, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab929e 12 Figure 5.PI lines and CO lines in star Ton1: 2M17343616-3903344 for stellar parameters from Fern´ andez-Trincado et al

    Ahumada, R., Allende Prieto, C., Almeida, A., et al. 2020, ApJS, 249, 3, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab929e 12 Figure 5.PI lines and CO lines in star Ton1: 2M17343616-3903344 for stellar parameters from Fern´ andez-Trincado et al. (2021c) and ASPCAP parameters, with T eff = 3890 K and 3982 K, respectively. CO lines intensity changes more dramatically in the te...

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab929e 2020

  3. [3]

    1998, A&A, 330, 1109, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9710157

    Alvarez, R., & Plez, B. 1998, A&A, 330, 1109, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9710157

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/9710157 1998

  4. [4]

    2020, MNRAS, 491, 972, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2952

    Andrassy, R., Herwig, F., Woodward, P., & Ritter, C. 2020, MNRAS, 491, 972, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2952

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2952 2020

  5. [5]

    M., & Grevesse, N

    Asplund, M., Amarsi, A. M., & Grevesse, N. 2021, A&A, 653, A141, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140445

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140445 2021

  6. [6]

    2018, ARA&A, 56, 223, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051826

    Barbuy, B., Chiappini, C., & Gerhard, O. 2018, ARA&A, 56, 223, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051826

    doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051826 2018

  7. [7]

    O., et al

    Barbuy, B., Ernandes, H., Souza, S. O., et al. 2021, A&A, 648, A16, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039761

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039761 2021

  8. [8]

    Barbuy, B., Fria¸ ca, A. C. S., Ernandes, H., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 526, 2365, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2888 —. 2024, A&A, 691, A296, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452235

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2888 2023

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    Barbuy, B., Ernandes, H., Fria¸ ca, A. C. S., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.11667, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.11667

    2025 doi arXiv

  2. [10]

    2018, MNRAS, 478, 1520, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1057

    Baumgardt, H., & Hilker, M. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 1520, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1057

    2018 doi

  3. [11]

    2021, MNRAS, 505, 5957, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1474

    Baumgardt, H., & Vasiliev, E. 2021, MNRAS, 505, 5957, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1474

    2021 doi

  4. [12]

    L., Oelkers, R

    Beaton, R. L., Oelkers, R. J., Hayes, C. R., et al. 2021, AJ, 162, 302, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac260c 13

    2021 doi

  5. [13]

    2024, MNRAS, 528, 3198, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3920

    Belokurov, V., & Kravtsov, A. 2024, MNRAS, 528, 3198, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3920

    2024 doi

  6. [14]

    Bica, E., Ortolani, S., Barbuy, B., & Oliveira, R. A. P. 2024, A&A, 687, A201, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346377

    2024 doi

  7. [15]

    R., Bershady, M

    Blanton, M. R., Bershady, M. A., Abolfathi, B., et al. 2017, AJ, 154, 28, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa7567

    2017 doi

  8. [16]

    S., & Vaughan, Jr., A

    Bowen, I. S., & Vaughan, Jr., A. H. 1973, ApOpt, 12, 1430, doi: 10.1364/AO.12.001430

    1973 doi

  9. [17]

    A., et al

    Brauner, M., Masseron, T., Garc ´ ıa-Hern´ andez, D. A., et al. 2023, A&A, 673, A123, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346048

    2023 doi

  10. [18]

    A., & Lugaro, M

    Brauner, M., Pignatari, M., Masseron, T., Garc ´ ıa-Hern´ andez, D. A., & Lugaro, M. 2024, A&A, 690, A262, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451327

    2024 doi

  11. [19]

    2016, A&A, 585, A16, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527272

    Caffau, E., Andrievsky, S., Korotin, S., et al. 2016, A&A, 585, A16, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527272

    2016 doi

  12. [20]

    2011, A&A, 532, A98, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117313

    Caffau, E., Bonifacio, P., Faraggiana, R., & Steffen, M. 2011, A&A, 532, A98, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117313

    2011 doi

  13. [21]

    M., Cautun, M., Deason, A

    Callingham, T. M., Cautun, M., Deason, A. J., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 513, 4107, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1145

    2022 doi

  14. [22]

    2019, MNRAS, 482, 4372, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2967 da Silva, P., Barbuy, B., Ernandes, H., et al

    Cescutti, G., & Molaro, P. 2019, MNRAS, 482, 4372, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2967 da Silva, P., Barbuy, B., Ernandes, H., et al. 2024, A&A, 687, A66, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449342

    2019 doi

  15. [23]

    2023, ApJ, 942, 104, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aca9ce Fern´ andez-Trincado, J

    Pallanca, C. 2023, ApJ, 942, 104, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aca9ce Fern´ andez-Trincado, J. G., Zamora, O., Souto, D., et al. 2019, A&A, 627, A178, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834391 Fern´ andez-Trincado, J. G., Minniti, D., Beers, T. C., et al. 2020, A&A, 643, A145, doi: 10.1051/0...

    2023 doi

  16. [24]

    Forbes, D. A. 2020, MNRAS, 493, 847, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa245

    2020 doi

  17. [25]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2502.18607, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2502.18607 Garc ´ ıa P´ erez, A

    Frelijj, H., Gonz´ alez-D ´ ıaz, D., Geisler, D., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2502.18607, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2502.18607 Garc ´ ıa P´ erez, A. E., Allende Prieto, C., Holtzman, J. A., et al. 2016, AJ, 151, 144, doi: 10.3847/0004-6256/151/6/144

    2025 doi

  18. [26]

    E., et al

    Geisler, D., Villanova, S., O’Connell, J. E., et al. 2021, A&A, 652, A157, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140436

    2021 doi

  19. [27]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.09970, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2508.09970 Gonz´ alez-D ´ ıaz, D., Fern´ andez-Trincado, J

    Geisler, D., Mu˜ noz, C., Villanova, S., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.09970, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2508.09970 Gonz´ alez-D ´ ıaz, D., Fern´ andez-Trincado, J. G., Villanova, S., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 526, 6274, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3178

    2025 doi

  20. [28]

    E., Siegmund, W

    Gunn, J. E., Siegmund, W. A., Mannery, E. J., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 2332, doi: 10.1086/500975

    2006 doi

  21. [29]

    2008, A&A, 486, 951, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200809724

    Gustafsson, B., Edvardsson, B., Eriksson, K., et al. 2008, A&A, 486, 951, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200809724

    2008 doi

  22. [30]

    Henao, L., Villanova, S., Geisler, D., & Fern´ andez-Trincado, J. G. 2025, A&A, 696, A154, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451793

    2025 doi

  23. [31]

    Doherty, C. L. 2016, ApJ, 818, 98, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/818/1/98

    2016 doi

  24. [32]

    I., & Lattanzio, J

    Karakas, A. I., & Lattanzio, J. C. 2014, PASA, 31, e030, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2014.21

    2014 doi

  25. [33]

    2023, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 73, 315, doi: 10.1146/annurev-nucl-102422-080857

    Lugaro, M., Pignatari, M., Reifarth, R., & Wiescher, M. 2023, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 73, 315, doi: 10.1146/annurev-nucl-102422-080857

    2023 doi

  26. [34]

    G., Cescutti, G., & Pilachowski, C

    Maas, Z. G., Cescutti, G., & Pilachowski, C. A. 2019, AJ, 158, 219, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab4a1a

    2019 doi

  27. [35]

    G., Hawkins, K., Hinkel, N

    Maas, Z. G., Hawkins, K., Hinkel, N. R., et al. 2022, AJ, 164, 61, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac77f8

    2022 doi

  28. [36]

    R., Schiavon, R

    Majewski, S. R., Schiavon, R. P., Frinchaboy, P. M., et al. 2017, AJ, 154, 94, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa784d

    2017 doi

  29. [37]

    H., & Helmi, A

    Massari, D., Koppelman, H. H., & Helmi, A. 2019, A&A, 630, L4, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936135

    2019 doi

  30. [38]

    A., Santove˜ na, R., et al

    Masseron, T., Garc ´ ıa-Hern´ andez, D. A., Santove˜ na, R., et al. 2020a, Nature Communications, 11, 3759, doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17649-9

    doi

  31. [39]

    2020b, ApJL, 904, L1, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abc6ac

    Manchado, A. 2020b, ApJL, 904, L1, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abc6ac

    doi

  32. [40]

    G., et al

    Minniti, D., Matsunaga, N., Fern´ andez-Trincado, J. G., et al. 2024, A&A, 683, A150, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348100

    2024 doi

  33. [41]

    2022, A&A, 668, A88, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244724

    Nandakumar, G., Ryde, N., Montelius, M., et al. 2022, A&A, 668, A88, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244724

    2022 doi

  34. [42]

    A., & Mead, H

    Nelder, J. A., & Mead, H. 1965, The Computer Journal, 7, 308–313, doi: 10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308

    1965 doi

  35. [43]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.06863, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.06863 14

    Nepal, S., Chiappini, C., P´ erez-Villegas, A., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.06863, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.06863 14

    2025 doi

  36. [44]

    L., Holtzman, J

    Nidever, D. L., Holtzman, J. A., Allende Prieto, C., et al. 2015, AJ, 150, 173, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/150/6/173 P´ erez-Villegas, A., Barbuy, B., Kerber, L. O., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 491, 3251, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3162

    2015 doi

  37. [45]

    2016, ApJS, 225, 24, doi: 10.3847/0067-0049/225/2/24

    Pignatari, M., Herwig, F., Hirschi, R., et al. 2016, ApJS, 225, 24, doi: 10.3847/0067-0049/225/2/24

    2016 doi

  38. [46]

    2012, Turbospectrum: Code for spectral synthesis, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1205.004

    Plez, B. 2012, Turbospectrum: Code for spectral synthesis, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1205.004

    2012

  39. [47]

    Queiroz, A. B. A., Chiappini, C., Perez-Villegas, A., et al. 2021, A&A, 656, A156, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039030

    2021 doi

  40. [48]

    C., et al

    Razera, R., Barbuy, B., Moura, T. C., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 517, 4590, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2136

    2022 doi

  41. [49]

    2018, MNRAS, 474, L1, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slx126

    Ritter, C., Andrassy, R., Cˆ ot´ e, B., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 474, L1, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slx126

    2018 doi

  42. [50]

    E., et al

    Roberti, L., Pignatari, M., Brinkman, H. E., et al. 2025, A&A, 698, A216, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554461

    2025 doi

  43. [51]

    2014, ApJ, 797, 69, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/797/1/69

    Frebel, A., & Toller, E. 2014, ApJ, 797, 69, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/797/1/69

    2014 doi

  44. [52]

    2022, PASJ, 74, 298, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psab125

    Sadakane, K., & Nishimura, M. 2022, PASJ, 74, 298, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psab125

    2022 doi

  45. [53]

    A., Beaton, R

    Santana, F. A., Beaton, R. L., Covey, K. R., et al. 2021, AJ, 162, 303, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac2cbc

    2021 doi

  46. [54]

    P., Phillips, S

    Schiavon, R. P., Phillips, S. G., Myers, N., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 528, 1393, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3020

    2024 doi

  47. [55]

    H., & Kraft, R

    Smith, G. H., & Kraft, R. P. 1996, PASP, 108, 344, doi: 10.1086/133728

    1996 doi

  48. [56]

    V., Bizyaev, D., Cunha, K., et al

    Smith, V. V., Bizyaev, D., Cunha, K., et al. 2021, AJ, 161, 254, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abefdc

    2021 doi

  49. [57]

    O., Libralato, M., Nardiello, D., et al

    Souza, S. O., Libralato, M., Nardiello, D., et al. 2024a, A&A, 690, A37, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450795

    doi

  50. [58]

    O., Valentini, M., Chiappini, C., et al

    Souza, S. O., Valentini, M., Chiappini, C., et al. 2024b, ApJL, 977, L33, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad91af

    doi

  51. [59]

    C., Hearty, F

    Wilson, J. C., Hearty, F. R., Skrutskie, M. F., et al. 2019, PASP, 131, 055001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ab0075

    2019 doi

  52. [60]

    2008, ApJ, 686, 448, doi: 10.1086/591266

    Yoshida, T., Suzuki, T., Chiba, S., et al. 2008, ApJ, 686, 448, doi: 10.1086/591266

    2008 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.