REVIEW 1 cited by
Decoding Complexity: Exploring Human-AI Concordance in Qualitative Coding
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Qualitative data analysis provides insight into the underlying perceptions and experiences within unstructured data. However, the time-consuming nature of the coding process, especially for larger datasets, calls for innovative approaches, such as the integration of Large Language Models (LLMs). This short paper presents initial findings from a study investigating the integration of LLMs for coding tasks of varying complexity in a real-world dataset. Our results highlight the challenges inherent in coding with extensive codebooks and contexts, both for human coders and LLMs, and suggest that the integration of LLMs into the coding process requires a task-by-task evaluation. We examine factors influencing the complexity of coding tasks and initiate a discussion on the usefulness and limitations of incorporating LLMs in qualitative research.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
From Assistance to Autonomy -- A Researcher Study on the Potential of AI Support for Qualitative Data Analysis
Interviews with 15 HCI researchers show openness to AI in qualitative data analysis under conditions of privacy, control, and reliability, leading to a framework of AI involvement levels from minimal to high.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.