pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.00125 · v2 · pith:DK2VOIXJnew · submitted 2026-04-30 · ⚛️ physics.acc-ph

High temporal resolution THz streaking of high brightness relativistic electron beams

Maximilian Lenz , Brian Schaap , Atharva Kulkarni , Yuemei Tan , Yining Yang , Renkai Li , Pietro Musumeci This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 00:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.acc-ph
keywords THz streakingrelativistic electron beamshorn-coupled waveguidesultrafast beam diagnosticsRF photoinjectorterahertz fieldsbeam characterizationtemporal resolution
0
0 comments X

The pith

Horn-coupled THz waveguides enable systematic characterization of relativistic electron beam streaking for ultrafast diagnostics.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper performs a systematic experimental study of terahertz streaking structures based on horn-coupled waveguide geometries to characterize relativistic high-brightness electron beams. Analytical models and electromagnetic simulations describe how streaking power depends on waveguide dimensions and drive frequency, while experiments with compressed beams from an RF photoinjector test streaking strength, dispersion, transmission, and temporal fidelity across varying field strengths, energies, and bunch durations. The central goal is to identify general design principles and performance limits that would support reliable ultrafast beam diagnostics. A sympathetic reader would care because accurate temporal profiling of such beams directly affects the precision of accelerator-based experiments and free-electron laser sources.

Core claim

Horn-coupled waveguide geometries for THz streaking allow comparative measurement of streaking strength, dispersion, transmission, and temporal fidelity; analytical models and simulations show the dependence of streaking power on waveguide dimensions and drive frequency; experimental characterization with relativistic electron beams from an RF photoinjector over ranges of THz field strength, beam energy, and bunch duration establishes general design principles and performance limits for these structures in ultrafast electron beam diagnostics.

What carries the argument

Horn-coupled waveguide geometries that couple THz fields into the electron beam path to induce streaking while controlling dispersion and transmission.

If this is right

  • Streaking power scales predictably with waveguide dimensions and drive frequency according to the analytical models.
  • Dispersion and transmission losses set concrete upper bounds on temporal resolution achievable in a given geometry.
  • The same structures can be applied across a practical range of beam energies and bunch durations without redesign.
  • Performance limits identified in the study directly inform the choice of THz field strength for a target diagnostic resolution.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These design rules could be used to adapt the structures for integration into operating accelerator beamlines for continuous monitoring.
  • The scaling relations may extend to non-relativistic beams or different frequency bands if the same electromagnetic assumptions hold.
  • Improved temporal fidelity could enable new classes of pump-probe experiments that resolve sub-picosecond dynamics in beam-driven sources.

Load-bearing premise

Electron beam parameters such as energy, duration, and transverse size remain stable and accurately known across different THz field strengths and waveguide configurations, allowing streaking signals to be attributed to the structures themselves.

What would settle it

Streaking signals that change substantially when beam energy or duration varies slightly while the waveguide and THz drive remain fixed would show that beam instability rather than waveguide properties dominate the results.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.00125 by Atharva Kulkarni, Brian Schaap, Maximilian Lenz, Pietro Musumeci, Renkai Li, Yining Yang, Yuemei Tan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Cartoon diagram of horn-coupled hollow waveguide [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: a) Map of the field experienced along the structure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: THz structures characterized at UCLA Pegasus [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Schematic of the beamline layout and THz source implementation. The Ti:sapphire laser is split into three arms: one [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: The top right row depicts four raw images of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Although this approach cannot retrieve sub-cycle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Extrema-based waveform reconstruction procedure: a) Identification of extrema via windowed accumulation. b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Reconstructed waveform for the horn-coupled rectangular waveguide (a) and parallel plate waveguide (b) described in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Measured streaking gradient and THz pulse energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Measured deflection angle on the right and inferred [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Simulated longitudinal phase space at the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: Averaged reconstructed temporal distributions for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Since the true spectrum ˜nt(ω) is unknown, it is approximated by the measured spectrum ˜ny(ω) to eval￾uate R(ω). In the frequency domain, deconvolution is limited by the finite signal-to-noise ratio. Let ˜n0(ω) denote the Fourier transform of the unstreaked distribution and N˜(ω) the spectral noise floor of the detection system. The usable bandwidth is restricted to frequencies below the cutoff ωc defined… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: Fourier spectra of the unstreaked distribution, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_12.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We report a systematic experimental study of terahertz (THz) streaking structures for ultrafast characterization of relativistic, high-brightness electron beams. Horn-coupled waveguide geometries are investigated, enabling a comparative characterization of streaking strength, dispersion, transmission, and temporal fidelity. Analytical models and electromagnetic simulations are used to describe the dependence of streaking power on the waveguide dimensions and the drive frequency. Experimentally, the structures are characterized using compressed electron beam from an RF photoinjector over a range of THz field strengths, beam energies, and bunch durations. These results establish general design principles and performance limits for THz streaking structures applicable to ultrafast electron beam diagnostics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper reports a systematic experimental study of horn-coupled THz waveguide streaking structures for ultrafast characterization of relativistic high-brightness electron beams from an RF photoinjector. Analytical models and electromagnetic simulations describe streaking power dependence on waveguide dimensions and drive frequency. Experiments characterize streaking strength, dispersion, transmission, and temporal fidelity over ranges of THz field strengths, beam energies, and bunch durations, establishing general design principles and performance limits for such diagnostics.

Significance. If the central attribution of streaking signals holds, the work supplies valuable experimental benchmarks and comparative data on waveguide geometries that can guide design of high-temporal-resolution beam diagnostics in accelerator physics. The combination of direct measurements with supporting simulations is a strength, though the load-bearing assumption of beam-parameter stability requires explicit verification to support the general-design-principles claim.

major comments (1)
  1. [Experimental characterization] Experimental characterization section: the manuscript does not report independent diagnostics (e.g., repeated energy-spectrometer shots, transverse-emittance scans, or bunch-length measurements) performed at each combination of THz field strength and waveguide configuration. Without a quantitative stability budget demonstrating that injector jitter is much smaller than the observed streaking effect, the isolation of structure performance from possible RF-photoinjector variations remains insecure; this directly undermines the mapping from data to the claimed general design principles.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the range of conditions tested but does not include quantitative metrics of experiment-simulation agreement or error bars; adding these would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review of our manuscript. We have addressed the major comment on experimental characterization by agreeing to strengthen the presentation of beam stability in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Experimental characterization] Experimental characterization section: the manuscript does not report independent diagnostics (e.g., repeated energy-spectrometer shots, transverse-emittance scans, or bunch-length measurements) performed at each combination of THz field strength and waveguide configuration. Without a quantitative stability budget demonstrating that injector jitter is much smaller than the observed streaking effect, the isolation of structure performance from possible RF-photoinjector variations remains insecure; this directly undermines the mapping from data to the claimed general design principles.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit stability budget is necessary to robustly support the claimed general design principles. The current manuscript does not include such a quantitative analysis or the requested independent diagnostics at each configuration. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection to the Experimental characterization section that presents shot-to-shot variations from the existing data sets (including repeated measurements at fixed THz and waveguide settings) together with a stability budget demonstrating that injector jitter remains substantially smaller than the observed streaking signals. This addition will directly address the concern and strengthen the isolation of structure performance. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; central results from direct experimental measurements and independent analytical/EM models

full rationale

The paper reports systematic experimental characterization of horn-coupled THz waveguide streaking structures using real compressed electron beams from an RF photoinjector, with variations in field strength, energy, and bunch duration. Analytical models and electromagnetic simulations are invoked to describe streaking power dependence on waveguide dimensions and drive frequency, but these are presented as first-principles descriptions rather than reductions to parameters fitted from the same dataset. No self-definitional equations, fitted-input predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the derivation chain; the mapping from observed streaking signals to design principles rests on external beam diagnostics and is self-contained against independent benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work relies on standard electromagnetic theory for waveguide propagation and on the assumption that the RF photoinjector produces well-characterized electron bunches; no new particles, forces, or dimensions are postulated.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Standard electromagnetic boundary conditions and mode propagation apply inside the horn-coupled waveguides at the chosen THz frequencies.
    Invoked when analytical models are used to describe streaking power dependence on waveguide dimensions and drive frequency.
  • domain assumption The electron beam parameters delivered by the RF photoinjector are stable and independently measurable across the tested range of THz field strengths.
    Required to attribute observed streaking signals to the waveguide structures rather than to uncontrolled variations in the incoming beam.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5656 in / 1511 out tokens · 38666 ms · 2026-05-21T00:39:39.434027+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Filippetto, P

    D. Filippetto, P. Musumeci, R. Li, B. J. Siwick, M. Otto, M. Centurion, and J. Nunes, Reviews of modern physics 94, 045004 (2022)

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Weathersby, G

    S. Weathersby, G. Brown, M. Centurion, T. Chase, R. Coffee, J. Corbett, J. Eichner, J. Frisch, A. Fry, M. G¨ uhr,et al., Review of Scientific Instruments86 11 (2015)

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    F. Qi, Z. Ma, L. Zhao, Y. Cheng, W. Jiang, C. Lu, T. Jiang, D. Qian, Z. Wang, W. Zhang,et al., Physi- cal review letters124, 134803 (2020)

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    P. Emma, R. Akre, J. Arthur, R. Bionta, C. Bostedt, J. Bozek, A. Brachmann, P. Bucksbaum, R. Coffee, F.-J. Decker,et al., nature photonics4, 641 (2010)

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    Duris, S

    J. Duris, S. Li, T. Driver, E. G. Champenois, J. P. MacArthur, A. A. Lutman, Z. Zhang, P. Rosenberger, J. W. Aldrich, R. Coffee,et al., Nature Photonics14, 30 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Hartemann, W

    F. Hartemann, W. Brown, D. Gibson, S. Anderson, A. Tremaine, P. Springer, A. Wootton, . f. E. Har- touni, and C. Barty, Physical Review Special Top- ics—Accelerators and Beams8, 100702 (2005)

    work page 2005

  7. [7]

    Graves, J

    W. Graves, J. Bessuille, P. Brown, S. Carbajo, V. Dol- gashev, K.-H. Hong, E. Ihloff, B. Khaykovich, H. Lin, K. Murari,et al., Physical Review Special Topics- Accelerators and Beams17, 120701 (2014)

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    P. Piot, C. Behrens, C. Gerth, M. Dohlus, F. Lemery, D. Mihalcea, P. Stoltz, and M. Vogt, Physical Review Letters108, 034801 (2012)

    work page 2012

  9. [9]

    Alesini, G

    D. Alesini, G. Di Pirro, L. Ficcadenti, A. Mostacci, L. Palumbo, J. Rosenzweig, and C. Vaccarezza, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment568, 488 (2006)

    work page 2006

  10. [10]

    Maxson, D

    J. Maxson, D. Cesar, G. Calmasini, A. Ody, P. Musumeci, and D. Alesini, Physical review letters 118, 154802 (2017)

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    R. Akre, D. Dowell, P. Emma, J. Frisch, S. Gile- vich, G. Hays, P. Hering, R. Iverson, C. Limborg- Deprey, H. Loos,et al., Physical Review Special Top- ics—Accelerators and Beams11, 030703 (2008)

    work page 2008

  12. [12]

    Behrens, F.-J

    C. Behrens, F.-J. Decker, Y. Ding, V. A. Dolgashev, J. Frisch, Z. Huang, P. Krejcik, H. Loos, A. Lutman, T. Maxwell,et al., Nature communications5, 3762 (2014)

    work page 2014

  13. [14]

    Kealhoferet al., Science352, 429 (2016)

    C. Kealhoferet al., Science352, 429 (2016)

    work page 2016

  14. [15]

    R. Li, M. Hoffmann, E. Nanni, S. Glenzer, M. Koz- ina, A. Lindenberg, B. Ofori-Okai, A. Reid, X. Shen, S. Weathersby,et al., Physical Review Accelerators and Beams22, 012803 (2019)

    work page 2019

  15. [16]

    L. Zhao, Z. Wang, C. Lu, R. Wang, C. Hu, P. Wang, J. Qi, T. Jiang, S. Liu, Z. Ma,et al., Physical Review X 8, 021061 (2018)

    work page 2018

  16. [17]

    M. A. Othman, A. E. Gabriel, E. C. Snively, M. E. Koz- ina, X. Shen, F. Ji, S. Lewis, S. Weathersby, P. Vasireddy, D. Luo,et al., Applied Physics Letters122(2023)

    work page 2023

  17. [18]

    Snively, M

    E. Snively, M. Othman, M. Kozina, B. Ofori-Okai, S. Weathersby, S. Park, X. Shen, X. Wang, M. Hoffmann, R. Li,et al., Physical review letters124, 054801 (2020)

    work page 2020

  18. [19]

    E. A. Nanni, W. R. Huang, K.-H. Hong, K. Ravi, A. Fal- lahi, G. Moriena, R. Dwayne Miller, and F. X. K¨ artner, Nature communications6, 8486 (2015)

    work page 2015

  19. [20]

    Zhang, A

    D. Zhang, A. Fallahi, M. Hemmer, X. Wu, M. Fakhari, Y. Hua, H. Cankaya, A.-L. Calendron, L. E. Zapata, N. H. Matlis,et al., Nature photonics12, 336 (2018)

    work page 2018

  20. [21]

    M. T. Hibberd, A. L. Healy, D. S. Lake, V. Georgiadis, E. J. Smith, O. J. Finlay, T. H. Pacey, J. K. Jones, Y. Saveliev, D. A. Walsh,et al., Nature Photonics14, 755 (2020)

    work page 2020

  21. [22]

    Zhang, M

    D. Zhang, M. Fakhari, H. Cankaya, A.-L. Calendron, N. H. Matlis, and F. X. K¨ artner, Physical Review X 10, 011067 (2020)

    work page 2020

  22. [23]

    H. Xu, L. Yan, Y. Du, W. Huang, Q. Tian, R. Li, Y. Liang, S. Gu, J. Shi, and C. Tang, Nature Photonics 15, 426 (2021)

    work page 2021

  23. [24]

    H. Tang, L. Zhao, P. Zhu, X. Zou, J. Qi, Y. Cheng, J. Qiu, X. Hu, W. Song, D. Xiang,et al., Physical Review Letters 127, 074801 (2021)

    work page 2021

  24. [25]

    Fabia´ nska, G

    J. Fabia´ nska, G. Kassier, and T. Feurer, Scientific re- ports4, 5645 (2014)

    work page 2014

  25. [26]

    Volkov, E

    M. Volkov, E. Ramachandran, M. Mattes, A. B. Swain, M. Tsarev, and P. Baum, ACS Photonics9, 3225 (2022)

    work page 2022

  26. [27]

    I. H. Baek, H. W. Kim, H. S. Bark, K.-H. Jang, S. Park, J. Shin, Y. C. Kim, M. Kim, K. Y. Oang, K. Lee,et al., Nature communications12, 6851 (2021)

    work page 2021

  27. [28]

    Y. Yang, Z. Wang, P. Lv, B. Song, P. Huang, Y. Jia, Z. Liu, L. Zheng, W. Huang, P. Musumeci,et al., arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.03946 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [29]

    Alesini, A

    D. Alesini, A. Battisti, M. Ferrario, L. Foggetta, V. Lollo, L. Ficcadenti, V. Pettinacci, S. Custodio, E. Pirez, P. Musumeci,et al., Physical Review Special Top- ics—Accelerators and Beams18, 092001 (2015)

    work page 2015

  29. [30]

    Lemery, K

    F. Lemery, K. Floettmann, T. Vinatier, and R. Assman, proceedings of IPAC (2017)

    work page 2017

  30. [31]

    Georgiadis, A

    V. Georgiadis, A. Healy, M. Hibberd, G. Burt, S. Jami- son, and D. Graham, Applied Physics Letters118 (2021)

    work page 2021

  31. [32]

    D. S. Lake, M. T. Hibberd, C. T. Shaw, V. Georgiadis, O. J. Finlay, D. M. Graham, G. M. Burt, R. B. Appleby, and S. P. Jamison, in2022 47th International Conference on Infrared, Millimeter and Terahertz Waves (IRMMW- THz)(IEEE, 2022) pp. 1–2

    work page 2022

  32. [33]

    Zangwill,Modern electrodynamics(Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 2013)

    A. Zangwill,Modern electrodynamics(Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 2013)

    work page 2013

  33. [34]

    W. L. Stutzman and G. A. Thiele,Antenna theory and design(John Wiley & Sons, 2012)

    work page 2012

  34. [35]

    X. Wu, D. Kong, S. Hao, Y. Zeng, X. Yu, B. Zhang, M. Dai, S. Liu, J. Wang, Z. Ren,et al., Advanced Mate- rials35, 2208947 (2023)

    work page 2023

  35. [36]

    T. Kroh, T. Rohwer, D. Zhang, U. Demirbas, H. Cankaya, M. Hemmer, Y. Hua, L. E. Zapata, M. Pergament, F. X. K¨ artner,et al., Optics Express30, 24186 (2022)

    work page 2022

  36. [37]

    Hebling, A

    J. Hebling, A. Stepanov, G. Alm´ asi, B. Bartal, and J. Kuhl, Applied Physics B78, 593 (2004)

    work page 2004

  37. [38]

    Hebling, G

    J. Hebling, G. Almasi, I. Z. Kozma, and J. Kuhl, Optics express10, 1161 (2002)

    work page 2002

  38. [39]

    Gayer, Z

    O. Gayer, Z. Sacks, E. Galun, and A. Arie, Applied Physics B91, 343 (2008)

    work page 2008

  39. [40]

    P´ alfalvi, J

    L. P´ alfalvi, J. Hebling, J. Kuhl, A. Peter, and K. Polg´ ar, Journal of applied physics97(2005)

    work page 2005

  40. [41]

    Nakamura, S

    M. Nakamura, S. Higuchi, S. Takekawa, K. Terabe, Y. Furukawa, and K. Kitamura, Japanese journal of ap- plied physics41, L49 (2002)

    work page 2002

  41. [42]

    Buz´ ady, R

    A. Buz´ ady, R. G´ alos, G. Makkai, X. Wu, G. T´ oth, L. Kov´ acs, G. Alm´ asi, J. Hebling, and L. P´ alfalvi, Op- tical Materials Express10, 998 (2020)

    work page 2020

  42. [43]

    Kreier and P

    D. Kreier and P. Baum, Optics letters37, 2373 (2012)

    work page 2012

  43. [44]

    Lenz and P

    M. Lenz and P. Musumeci, Instruments7, 39 (2023)

    work page 2023

  44. [45]

    Tokodi, J

    L. Tokodi, J. Hebling, and L. P´ alfalvi, Journal of In- frared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves38, 22 (2017)

    work page 2017

  45. [46]

    Guiramand, J

    L. Guiramand, J. Nkeck, X. Ropagnol, T. Ozaki, and 12 F. Blanchard, Photonics Research10, 340 (2022)

    work page 2022

  46. [47]

    A. E. Gabriel, M. A. Othman, P. L. Kramer, H. Miura, M. C. Hoffmann, and E. A. Nanni, Optics Express33, 37084 (2025)

    work page 2025

  47. [48]

    E. Prat, Z. Geng, C. Kittel, A. Malyzhenkov, F. Mar- cellini, S. Reiche, T. Schietinger, and P. Craievich, Ad- vanced Photonics7, 026002 (2025)

    work page 2025

  48. [49]

    Wiener,Extrapolation, interpolation, and smoothing of stationary time series: with engineering applications (The MIT press, 1949)

    N. Wiener,Extrapolation, interpolation, and smoothing of stationary time series: with engineering applications (The MIT press, 1949)

    work page 1949

  49. [50]

    Nyquist, Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers47, 617 (1928)

    H. Nyquist, Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers47, 617 (1928)

    work page 1928

  50. [51]

    L. Zhao, Z. Wang, H. Tang, R. Wang, Y. Cheng, C. Lu, T. Jiang, P. Zhu, L. Hu, W. Song,et al., Physical review letters122, 144801 (2019)

    work page 2019

  51. [52]

    Iwaszczuk, A

    K. Iwaszczuk, A. Andryieuski, A. Lavrinenko, X.-C. Zhang, and P. U. Jepsen, Optics express20, 8344 (2012)

    work page 2012

  52. [53]

    Rohrbach, B

    D. Rohrbach, B. J. Kang, E. Zyaee, and T. Feurer, Sci- entific reports13, 15228 (2023)

    work page 2023

  53. [54]

    X. He, J. Zheng, D. Su, J. Ying, L. Liu, H. Xuan, J. Ma, P. Yuan, N. H. Matlis, F. X. Kartner,et al., Acs Photon- ics12, 3064 (2025)

    work page 2025