Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Beyond-adiabatic flat Chern bands from a double-helix skyrmion crystal

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-07-12 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A double-helix skyrmion crystal flattens Chern bands by real-space phase clustering, beating the adiabatic limit at intermediate coupling.

desk verdict Solid architecture paper: DHSKX + phase clustering is a real, controlled real-space route to beyond-adiabatic flat Chern bands; FCI is finite-size only and the texture is frozen. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.03707 v1 pith:DKBUHSMY submitted 2026-07-04 cond-mat.str-el

Bin Xi , Ken Chen , Qiang Luo , Jie Lu , Jia-Wei Mei , Hong-Gang Luo , Jize Zhao This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords double-helixskyrmioncrystalphaseclusteringflatChernbandsquantumgeometryfractionalinsulatordoubleexchangehoneycomblatticetopolectriccircuits
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that a double-helix skyrmion crystal—two sublattice skyrmion textures locked at opposite helicities—solves a basic flat-band problem: how to kill net kinetic energy without killing Berry curvature. Under double exchange, the π-locked helicities push the electron wave function’s phase winding out of the skyrmion cores; magnetic C3 symmetry then pins that winding into three phase-locked clusters. The clusters cancel net transport by distributed destructive interference while the complex hoppings that carry Berry curvature survive. Ordinary same-helicity skyrmion crystals with the same symmetry do not form this organization. The resulting isolated flat |C|=1 bands exist over wide coupling windows, and one of them at intermediate coupling reaches a quantum-geometry figure of merit far better than the strong-coupling adiabatic reference. On that geometry-optimized branch, finite-size exact diagonalization shows signatures consistent with a ν=1/3 Laughlin-type fractional Chern insulator. Because the same architecture is just a network of site-resolved complex hoppings, it can be built directly in topolectric, acoustic or photonic platforms without needing a real magnetic ground state.

What carries the argument

Phase clustering: the π-locked opposite helicities of the double-helix skyrmion crystal force the electron wave function into three C3-pinned phase domains of nearly uniform phase (offsets ≈±2π/3). Those domains cancel net kinetic transport by distributed destructive interference while their circulating complex hoppings still generate Berry curvature.

What would settle it

Interpolate the sublattice helicity difference continuously to zero while keeping the cores and C3 symmetry intact: if phase clustering and the associated flatness and quantum-geometry improvement both disappear while the topological charges remain, the central architectural claim is confirmed; if flatness survives, the claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

A double-helix skyrmion crystal under double exchange produces isolated flat |C|=1 Chern bands over broad coupling windows by a single real-space mechanism called phase clustering: π-locked opposite helicities expel wave-function phase winding from the cores, and magnetic C3 pins it into three phase-locked clusters whose distributed destructive interference cancels net transport while preserving Berry curvature. One such branch at intermediate coupling surpasses the adiabatic strong-coupling reference in quantum geometry and supports finite-size evidence for ν=1/3 Laughlin-type fractional Chern insulator physics.

Load-bearing premise

The skyrmion texture is treated as a fixed classical background; electrons feel it only through double exchange and never feed back, so the reported bands exist only if that frozen classical state remains stable under quantum fluctuations, thermal disorder or finite electron density.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes that a double-helix skyrmion crystal (DHSKX)—two sublattice-resolved skyrmion textures locked at opposite helicities, obtained as the classical ground state of a frustrated honeycomb JΓ′ model with easy-plane anisotropy—generates isolated flat |C|=1 Chern bands under double exchange (Eq. 1). The claimed mechanism is phase clustering: π-locked opposite helicities expel wave-function phase winding from the skyrmion cores, and magnetic C3 pins the winding into three phase-locked clusters whose distributed destructive interference cancels net transport while preserving Berry curvature. Ordinary same-helicity skyrmion crystals with the same C3 do not develop this organization. One recurring |C|=1 branch (198th band) reaches σ_QG≈0.122 at intermediate coupling (t/J_H≈0.39), surpassing the adiabatic strong-coupling reference (398th band, σ_QG≈1.86). Band-projected exact diagonalization on tori up to N_φ=30 gives finite-size evidence consistent with ν=1/3 Laughlin-type FCI physics on that geometry-optimized branch; the same texture also hosts a C=−2 flat band. The architecture is argued to be programmable via site-resolved complex hoppings in topolectric, acoustic, and photonic platforms.

Significance. If the phase-clustering mechanism and the beyond-adiabatic quantum-geometry improvement hold, the work supplies a discrete, real-space architectural route to flat Chern bands that is complementary to moiré and continuum-skyrmion approaches. The controlled comparisons (helicity interpolation that destroys clustering while leaving cores and charges intact; same-helicity triple-Q textures that never develop clustering) and the quantitative geometry contrast (σ_QG≈0.122 vs ≈1.86) are concrete strengths. The programmable-circuit mapping further decouples the architecture from magnetic stability, making the single-particle claim falsifiable in engineered platforms. Finite-size FCI diagnostics are appropriately hedged and tied to the geometry-optimal window rather than to flatness alone. These elements make the paper a useful contribution to flat-band engineering even if material realization of a dynamical DHSKX remains open.

major comments (2)
  1. The magnetic texture is treated throughout as a fixed classical configuration of a 10×10×2 (or reduced 6×6) unit cell, with electrons coupled only through the double-exchange Hamiltonian (Eq. 1) and no self-consistent back-action, quantum spin fluctuations, or thermal disorder. All band, geometry, and FCI diagnostics rest on this frozen background. The paper correctly notes that the architecture can be programmed without a self-organized magnetic state, but the claim that the DHSKX is “obtained here as the classical ground state” of a JΓ′ model still requires at least a brief stability check (or an explicit statement that material realization is secondary) so that readers can separate the architectural result from the spin-model claim.
  2. Band-projected ED evidence for ν=1/3 Laughlin-type FCI physics is limited to accessible non-anomalous tori up to N_φ=30 (momentum-sector dimension ~10^6). The three-state manifold, gap-to-width growth along N_y=3, many-body Chern number C_MB=+1 on small tori, and matching particle-entanglement and quasihole countings are consistent with Laughlin physics, but the manuscript itself states that a definitive thermodynamic identification remains beyond present sizes. The FCI claim should be framed strictly as finite-size evidence tied to the geometry-optimal window (0.37≲t/J_H≲0.44), not as an established FCI phase, and any stronger language in the abstract or conclusion should be tempered accordingly.
minor comments (4)
  1. Figure 2 panels and insets are dense; the Chern-sector annotations and Berry-curvature maps would benefit from larger fonts and a clearer indication of which bands remain isolated versus merely flat.
  2. The definition of flatness (upper adjacent gap over bandwidth ≳10) is used operationally but never stated as a formal criterion in the main text; a short sentence would help.
  3. The reduced-period 6×6 analogue is mentioned as preserving phase clustering (70th and 142nd bands) but is not shown; a brief supplemental figure or quantitative flatness/σ_QG comparison would strengthen the architectural claim.
  4. Notation for the two block-edge bands (198th / 398th) is clear once introduced, but early figure captions would be easier to read if the Chern numbers and coupling values were repeated in the legend.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: flat Chern bands, phase clustering, quantum geometry, and FCI signatures are computed outputs of a stated double-exchange Hamiltonian on a fixed classical texture, not forced by definition or fit.

full rationale

The derivation chain is standard non-self-consistent double-exchange numerics. A classical DHSKX is taken as the ground-state texture of a frustrated honeycomb JΓ′ model (with easy-plane anisotropy and c-axis field), then held fixed; itinerant electrons are coupled only through the microscopic Hamiltonian Hex (Eq. 1). Isolated |C|=1 bands, flatness ratios, Berry curvature, σ_QG, bond-resolved currents, and band-projected ED spectra (N_φ ≤ 30) are obtained by diagonalization and standard topological diagnostics (Kubo Hall, Fukui–Hatsugai–Suzuki, quantum geometric tensor). None of these quantities is fitted to a target flatness, Chern number, or Laughlin gap; the beyond-adiabatic claim is a numerical comparison (σ_QG ≈ 0.122 at t/J_H = 0.39 vs ≈ 1.86 for the adiabatic reference). Control comparisons (helicity interpolation that destroys clustering while preserving cores and charges; same-helicity triple-Q textures that never cluster) are independent numerical tests, not definitional identities. The programmable topolectric/acoustic/photonic mapping further treats the architecture as a fixed complex-hopping network. Minor coauthor citation of the honeycomb Γ model (Luo & Kee) is background for the spin Hamiltonian and is not load-bearing for the electronic flat-band or FCI claims. No self-definitional loop, fitted-input-as-prediction, uniqueness import, or renaming of a known result is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard double-exchange and Chern-band machinery plus one invented magnetic architecture (DHSKX) generated as a classical ground state of a frustrated spin model. Free parameters are the coupling scan and the representative microscopic spin-model point; no data-fitting of topological invariants. Invented entities are the DHSKX texture and the phase-clustering organization, both with internal numerical handles (helicity interpolation, current cancellation) but no independent experimental observation yet.

free parameters (3)
  • t/J_H coupling ratio (scanned)
    Energy unit fixed t=1; J_H (or t/J_H) is the continuous control parameter over which flatness, Chern sectors, and σ_QG are reported. Representative points (0.01, 0.32, 0.39, 0.43, 0.72, 1.00) are chosen by hand to illustrate regimes.
  • Representative JΓ′ + easy-plane + c-axis field parameters for DHSKX
    A single ‘representative parameter point in the stable DHSKX regime’ of the frustrated honeycomb JΓ′ model is used to generate the 10×10×2 texture; full microscopic couplings are not exhaustively mapped in the main text.
  • Magnetic unit-cell size (10×10×2 primary; 6×6 reduced analogue)
    Periodicity of the classical texture is chosen to host the triple-Q DHSKX; band count (400) and ED system sizes follow from this choice.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Double-exchange Hamiltonian (Eq. 1) with classical localized spins S_i fully describes the itinerant electrons on the magnetic background.
    Standard Anderson–Hasegawa double exchange; quantum spin dynamics and self-consistent electron back-action on the texture are neglected throughout.
  • standard math Chern numbers from zero-temperature Kubo Hall response plus single-band Fukui–Hatsugai–Suzuki construction correctly identify isolated Chern sectors.
    Standard lattice topological diagnostics used to label the 198th, 398th, and 7th bands.
  • standard math Quantum geometry quality is measured by σ_QG = ∫(tr g − |Ω|) / ∫|Ω|, with ideal Landau-level limit σ_QG=0.
    Trace condition of Roy and related flat-band geometry literature; used to claim beyond-adiabatic improvement at t/J_H=0.39.
  • domain assumption Band-projected exact diagonalization on small tori (N_φ≤30) with Laughlin momentum sectors, PES, quasihole counting, and many-body Chern is sufficient finite-size evidence for ν=1/3 Laughlin-type FCI physics.
    Standard FCI diagnostic suite; paper itself notes thermodynamic identification is beyond present sizes.
  • ad hoc to paper Classical ground state of the frustrated honeycomb JΓ′ model with easy-plane anisotropy and c-axis field is a stable DHSKX with opposite sublattice helicities and Q_v≈−1 per sublattice.
    DHSKX is obtained as classical GS of a specific spin model at a representative point; quantum/thermal stability is not demonstrated.
invented entities (2)
  • Double-helix skyrmion crystal (DHSKX)
    purpose: Provide the magnetic architecture whose π-locked opposite helicities force phase clustering and flat Chern bands under double exchange.
    Composite of two sublattice-resolved Bloch skyrmions with helicities differing by π and total topological charge −2; distinct from conventional biskyrmions and AF skyrmions. Independent experimental realization not shown.
  • Phase clustering
    purpose: Name the real-space wavefunction organization (three C3-pinned phase domains with ±2π/3 offsets) that cancels net transport while preserving Berry curvature.
    Diagnosed in the atomic-orbital basis of the flat |C|=1 bands; destroyed by helicity interpolation. Internal numerical handle exists; no external experimental probe yet.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Beyond-adiabatic flat Chern bands from a double-helix skyrmion crystal." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DKBUHSMY

@misc{pith2026260703707,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Beyond-adiabatic flat Chern bands from a double-helix skyrmion crystal},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DKBUHSMY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.03707}
}
abstract

A central challenge in flat-band engineering is suppressing kinetic energy without sacrificing Berry curvature. We show that a double-helix skyrmion crystal (DHSKX)--two sublattice-resolved skyrmion textures locked at opposite helicities, obtained here as the classical ground state of a frustrated honeycomb spin model--provides such a route under double exchange. The key mechanism is a single real-space organization, phase clustering: the $\pi$-locked helicities expel the wave function's phase winding from the skyrmion cores, and the magnetic $C_3$ symmetry pins it into three phase-locked clusters whose distributed destructive interference cancels net transport while preserving the Berry curvature. Ordinary skyrmion crystals, even with the same symmetry, do not develop this organization. Phase clustering yields isolated flat $|C| = 1$ Chern bands over broad coupling windows, one of which surpasses the adiabatic reference in quantum geometry at intermediate coupling. In this beyond-adiabatic window, band-projected exact diagonalization gives finite-size evidence consistent with $\nu = 1/3$ Laughlin-type fractional-Chern-insulator physics; the same texture also hosts a higher-Chern ($C = -2$) flat band. Built from site-resolved complex hoppings alone, the DHSKX architecture is directly programmable in topolectric, acoustic, and photonic platforms.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.03707 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Representative DHSKX configuration. (a) Full spin texture. (b,c) Sublattice-resolved spin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Flat Chern bands in the DHSKX background. (a–d) Narrow energy windows around the 398th [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Real-space wave-function fingerprints relevant to Fig. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Spin Splitter without Spin-Split Bands: A Reconfigurable Altermagnetic Texture

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-08 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    A counter-spiral magnetic texture generates a pure transverse spin current without spin-split bands, with polarization fixed by a helicity mirror and rotatable in 120-degree steps.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Tang, J.-W

    E. Tang, J.-W. Mei, and X.-G. Wen, High-temperature fractional quantum hall states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 236802 (2011)

    2011

  2. [2]

    K. Sun, Z. Gu, H. Katsura, and S. Das Sarma, Nearly flatbands with nontrivial topology, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 236803 (2011)

    2011

  3. [3]

    Neupert, L

    T. Neupert, L. Santos, C. Chamon, and C. Mudry, Fractional quantum hall states at zero magnetic field, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 236804 (2011)

    2011

  4. [4]

    D. N. Sheng, Z.-C. Gu, K. Sun, and L. Sheng, Fractional quantum hall effect in the absence of landau levels, Nature Communications2, 389 (2011)

    2011

  5. [5]

    Regnault and B

    N. Regnault and B. A. Bernevig, Fractional chern insulator, Phys. Rev. X1, 021014 (2011)

    2011

  6. [6]

    Wang, Z.-C

    Y .-F. Wang, Z.-C. Gu, C.-D. Gong, and D. N. Sheng, Fractional quantum hall effect of hard-core bosons in topological flat bands, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 146803 (2011)

    2011

  7. [7]

    Yankowitz, S

    M. Yankowitz, S. Chen, H. Polshyn, Y . Zhang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. Graf, A. F. Young, and C. R. Dean, Tuning superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene, Science363, 1059 (2019)

    2019

  8. [8]

    Bistritzer and A

    R. Bistritzer and A. H. MacDonald, Moiré bands in twisted double-layer graphene, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences108, 12233 (2011)

    2011

Show all 40 references
  1. [9]

    E. Y . Andrei and A. H. MacDonald, Graphene bilayers with a twist, Nat. Mater.19, 1265 (2020)

    2020

  2. [10]

    Tang and L

    E. Tang and L. Fu, Strain-induced partially flat band, helical snake states and interface superconduc- tivity in topological crystalline insulators, Nat. Phys.10, 964 (2014). 11

    2014

  3. [11]

    Balents, C

    L. Balents, C. R. Dean, D. K. Efetov, and A. F. Young, Superconductivity and strong correlations in moiré flat bands, Nat. Phys.16, 725 (2020)

    2020

  4. [12]

    Y . Li, S. Dietrich, C. Forsythe, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, P. Moon, and C. R. Dean, Anisotropic band flattening in graphene with one-dimensional superlattices, Nature Nanotechnology16, 525 (2021)

    2021

  5. [13]

    Xie and A

    M. Xie and A. H. MacDonald, Nature of the Correlated Insulator States in Twisted Bilayer Graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 097601 (2020)

    2020

  6. [14]

    Zhang, D

    Y .-H. Zhang, D. Mao, and T. Senthil, Twisted bilayer graphene aligned with hexagonal boron nitride: Anomalous Hall effect and a lattice model, Phys. Rev. Res.1, 033126 (2019)

    2019

  7. [15]

    F. Wu, T. Lovorn, E. Tutuc, I. Martin, and A. H. MacDonald, Topological Insulators in Twisted Tran- sition Metal Dichalcogenide Homobilayers, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 086402 (2019)

    2019

  8. [16]

    H. Yu, M. Chen, and W. Yao, Giant magnetic field from moiré induced Berry phase in homobilayer semiconductors, Natl. Sci. Rev.7, 12 (2020)

    2020

  9. [17]

    Zhang, C

    X.-W. Zhang, C. Wang, X. Liu, Y . Fan, T. Cao, and D. Xiao, Polarization-driven band topology evo- lution in twisted MoTe2 and WSe2, Nat. Commun.15, 1 (2024)

    2024

  10. [18]

    S. A. A. Ghorashi, A. Dunbrack, A. Abouelkomsan, J. Sun, X. Du, and J. Cano, Topological and stacked flat bands in bilayer graphene with a superlattice potential, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 196201 (2023)

    2023

  11. [19]

    N. Paul, Y . Zhang, and L. Fu, Giant proximity exchange and flat Chern band in 2D magnet- semiconductor heterostructures, Sci. Adv.9, 10.1126/sciadv.abn1401 (2023)

    2023 doi

  12. [20]

    Y . Guan, O. V . Yazyev, and A. Kruchkov, Unconventional flat chern bands and 2e charges in skyrmionic moiré superlattices, Nano Lett.23, 4209 (2023)

    2023

  13. [21]

    C. Wang, X. Shen, R. Guo, C. Wang, W. Duan, and Y . Xu, Fractional chern insulators in moiré flat bands with high chern numbers (2024), arXiv:2408.03305 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Hamamoto, M

    K. Hamamoto, M. Ezawa, and N. Nagaosa, Quantized topological hall effect in skyrmion crystal, Phys. Rev. B92, 115417 (2015)

    2015

  15. [23]

    Göbel, A

    B. Göbel, A. Mook, J. Henk, and I. Mertig, Unconventional topological Hall effect in skyrmion crys- tals caused by the topology of the lattice, Phys. Rev. B95, 094413 (2017)

    2017

  16. [24]

    W. J. Hardy, A. Bose, T. Grover, and A. Paramekanti, Charge ordering and spontaneous topological Hall effect in bilayer skyrmion crystals, Phys. Rev. B111, 115115 (2025)

    2025

  17. [25]

    X. Z. Yu, Y . Tokunaga, Y . Kaneko, W. Z. Zhang, K. Kimoto, Y . Matsui, Y . Taguchi, and Y . Tokura, Biskyrmion states and their current-driven motion in a layered manganite, Nat. Commun.5, 3198 12 (2014)

    2014

  18. [26]

    Zhang, Y

    X. Zhang, Y . Zhou, and M. Ezawa, Antiferromagnetic skyrmion: Stability, creation and manipulation, Sci. Rep.6, 24795 (2016)

    2016

  19. [27]

    Nagaosa and Y

    N. Nagaosa and Y . Tokura, Topological properties and dynamics of magnetic skyrmions, Nat. Nan- otechnol.8, 899 (2013)

    2013

  20. [28]

    Luo and H.-Y

    Q. Luo and H.-Y . Kee, Interplay of magnetic field and trigonal distortion in the honeycombΓmodel: Occurrence of a spin-flop phase, Phys. Rev. B105, 174435 (2022)

    2022

  21. [29]

    P. W. Anderson and H. Hasegawa, Considerations on double exchange, Phys. Rev.100, 675 (1955)

    1955

  22. [30]

    Kubo, Statistical-Mechanical Theory of Irreversible Processes

    R. Kubo, Statistical-Mechanical Theory of Irreversible Processes. I. General Theory and Simple Ap- plications to Magnetic and Conduction Problems, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.12, 570 (1957)

    1957

  23. [31]

    Fukui, Y

    T. Fukui, Y . Hatsugai, and H. Suzuki, Chern numbers in discretized brillouin zone: Efficient method of computing (spin) hall conductances, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.74, 1674 (2005)

    2005

  24. [32]

    D. L. Bergman, C. Wu, and L. Balents, Band touching from real-space topology in frustrated hopping models, Phys. Rev. B78, 125104 (2008)

    2008

  25. [33]

    Roy, Band geometry of fractional topological insulators, Phys

    R. Roy, Band geometry of fractional topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B90, 165139 (2014)

    2014

  26. [34]

    J. Wang, J. Cano, A. J. Millis, Z. Liu, and B. Yang, Exact Landau Level Description of Geometry and Interaction in a Flatband, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 246403 (2021)

    2021

  27. [35]

    J. P. Provost and G. Vallée, Riemannian structure on manifolds of quantum states, Commun. Math. Phys.76, 289 (1980)

    1980

  28. [36]

    S. A. Parameswaran, R. Roy, and S. L. Sondhi, Fractional quantum Hall physics in topological flat bands, C. R. Physique14, 816 (2013)

    2013

  29. [37]

    Li and F

    H. Li and F. D. M. Haldane, Entanglement spectrum as a generalization of entanglement entropy: Identification of topological order in non-Abelian fractional quantum Hall effect states, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 010504 (2008)

    2008

  30. [38]

    C. H. Lee, S. Imhof, C. Berber, F. Bayer, J. Brehm, L. W. Molenkamp, T. Kiessling, and R. Thomale, Topolectrical circuits, Commun. Phys.1, 39 (2018)

    2018

  31. [39]

    Imhof, C

    S. Imhof, C. Berger, F. Bayer, J. Brehm, L. W. Molenkamp, T. Kiessling, F. Schindler, C. H. Lee, M. Greiter, T. Neupert, and R. Thomale, Topolectrical-circuit realization of topological corner modes, Nat. Phys.14, 925 (2018)

    2018

  32. [40]

    J. Wu, Z. Wang, Y . Biao, F. Fei, S. Zhang, Z. Yin, Y . Hu, Z. Song, T. Wu, F. Song, and R. Yu, Non-Abelian gauge fields in circuit systems, Nat. Electron.5, 635 (2022). 13

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed July 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.