pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.29145 · v1 · pith:DKCVJLPVnew · submitted 2026-06-28 · 💰 econ.EM

Why Do We Need Travel Behavior Theory in the Age of AI? Multiple Goal Pursuit as an Illustrative Theory

Jason Hawkins , Omid Armantalab This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 02:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💰 econ.EM
keywords travel behavior theorygoal pursuit theoryrandom utility maximizationAI predictionactivity schedulingvehicle ownershiplocation choicebehavioral modeling
0
0 comments X

The pith

Goal pursuit theory models how travelers activate context-dependent goals, resolve conflicts, and make sequential decisions, serving as a necessary complement to AI prediction in travel behavior research.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that AI tools are improving predictive accuracy in travel demand modeling but often at the expense of behavioral explanation rooted in hypothesis testing. Goal pursuit theory is used to show how models can explicitly capture travelers activating goals such as hedonic, gain, or normative ones depending on context, resolving conflicts among competing objectives, and handling decisions that unfold over different time scales. This is illustrated in three applications covering activity scheduling with hierarchical structures, disentangling goals in vehicle ownership, and location choice with latent interactions. A sympathetic reader would care because pure predictive models may fail to explain why choices shift under policy changes or new conditions, limiting insight into underlying motivations.

Core claim

Unlike random utility maximization or random regret minimization, goal pursuit theory explicitly models how travelers activate context-dependent goals (hedonic, gain, normative), resolve conflicts between competing objectives, and make sequential decisions across temporal scales. The paper demonstrates this through applications to activity scheduling for hierarchical goal structures, vehicle ownership for bundled mobility goals, and location choice for latent goal interactions via matrix factorization, along with guidance on hybrid choice model specifications, parallels to other behavioral theories, and data requirements for benchmarks against RUM and RRM.

What carries the argument

Goal pursuit theory (GPT), which models context-dependent goal activation, resolution of conflicts between objectives, and sequential decisions across temporal scales.

If this is right

  • Hybrid choice models can link activated goals to observable travel behaviors for practical implementation.
  • Goal pursuit theory handles hierarchical goal structures in activity scheduling applications.
  • It disentangles bundled mobility goals when modeling vehicle ownership decisions.
  • Latent goal interactions in location choice can be captured through matrix factorization techniques.
  • Comparative benchmarks against RUM and RRM can be performed using the specified data requirements and model specifications.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If goal pursuit theory is integrated into models, it may better forecast how travel patterns respond to interventions aimed at specific goal types such as normative environmental concerns.
  • Combining goal pursuit theory with other existing behavioral frameworks in transportation could address multi-scale decision processes more comprehensively.
  • Direct tests on real-world choice data could determine whether the added goal structures yield policy insights that pure AI predictions do not provide.

Load-bearing premise

Conceptual demonstrations in three transport applications are sufficient to establish goal pursuit theory as a necessary complement to AI prediction without requiring new empirical validation or direct comparisons of explanatory power against RUM or RRM.

What would settle it

An empirical study on datasets for activity scheduling, vehicle ownership, or location choice that finds no improvement in explanatory power or out-of-sample prediction from goal pursuit theory models relative to random utility maximization or random regret minimization models.

read the original abstract

Travel behavior and demand modeling seeks to understand the factors that motivate transportation decisions. At the same time, the field is increasingly adopting algorithmic and artificial intelligence (AI) tools that improve predictive accuracy, often at the cost of a grounding in hypothesis-based theory validation and behavioural explanation. In this discussion paper, we use goal pursuit theory (GPT) to illustrate why behavioral theory is a necessary complement to prediction in travel behavior research. Unlike random utility maximization (RUM) or close alternatives (e.g., random regret minimization (RRM)), GPT explicitly models how travelers (1) activate context-dependent goals (hedonic, gain, normative), (2) resolve conflicts between competing objectives, and (3) make sequential decisions across temporal scales. We demonstrate GPT's merits through three transport applications: activity scheduling (handling hierarchical goal structures), vehicle ownership (disentangling bundled mobility goals), and location choice (capturing latent goal interactions via matrix factorization). We provide actionable guidance for implementation, including: (a) hybrid choice model specifications linking goals to observable behaviors, (b) parallels to complementary behavioral theories from the transportation field, and (c) data requirements and comparative benchmarks against RUM/RRM models.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. This discussion paper argues that behavioral theory, illustrated via Goal Pursuit Theory (GPT), is a necessary complement to AI-based prediction in travel behavior modeling. Unlike RUM or RRM, GPT is claimed to explicitly capture context-dependent goal activation (hedonic/gain/normative), conflict resolution among objectives, and sequential multi-scale decisions. The argument rests on narrative descriptions of three applications (activity scheduling with hierarchical goals, vehicle ownership disentangling bundled goals, location choice via matrix factorization) plus high-level guidance on hybrid models, theory parallels, and RUM/RRM benchmarks.

Significance. If the claimed distinctions can be formalized and validated, the paper would contribute to debates on theory versus pure prediction in transportation by supplying concrete implementation paths that could improve explanatory power alongside AI accuracy.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that GPT 'explicitly models' goal activation, conflict resolution, and sequential decisions in ways RUM/RRM cannot is advanced without any formal model specification, likelihood function, or parameter definitions that would allow direct comparison or falsification.
  2. [Three transport applications] Three transport applications: the demonstrations are presented only as high-level narrative descriptions with no quantitative results, out-of-sample tests, or head-to-head comparisons against extended RUM (e.g., latent-class or dynamic variants), leaving the necessity claim unsupported by evidence.
minor comments (1)
  1. A summary table contrasting GPT features with RUM/RRM would improve readability and make the claimed distinctions easier to evaluate.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments. As a discussion paper, our contribution is conceptual and illustrative; we address the points on formalization and evidence below by clarifying scope and outlining targeted revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that GPT 'explicitly models' goal activation, conflict resolution, and sequential decisions in ways RUM/RRM cannot is advanced without any formal model specification, likelihood function, or parameter definitions that would allow direct comparison or falsification.

    Authors: We agree that a discussion paper benefits from greater clarity on mechanisms. In revision we will add a dedicated subsection sketching a high-level formal structure for GPT (including goal activation functions, conflict resolution rules, and multi-scale sequencing) with illustrative parameter definitions. This will not constitute a full likelihood but will enable conceptual comparison with RUM/RRM while preserving the paper's non-empirical focus. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Three transport applications] Three transport applications: the demonstrations are presented only as high-level narrative descriptions with no quantitative results, out-of-sample tests, or head-to-head comparisons against extended RUM (e.g., latent-class or dynamic variants), leaving the necessity claim unsupported by evidence.

    Authors: The applications are deliberately narrative to illustrate GPT's conceptual distinctions in context. We accept that this leaves the necessity argument at a theoretical level. Revision will expand the discussion section with explicit guidance on designing future empirical tests, including benchmarks against latent-class or dynamic RUM variants and required data structures, without adding new quantitative results. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: conceptual discussion with no derivations or fitted predictions

full rationale

The paper is a discussion piece that advances GPT as a conceptual complement to RUM/RRM via narrative descriptions of three applications and high-level implementation guidance. No equations, parameter estimations, or quantitative predictions appear in the provided text or abstract. Claims rest on discursive contrasts and references to external behavioral theories rather than any self-referential reduction of a result to its own inputs or self-citations. The argument is therefore self-contained and does not trigger any of the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based on the abstract alone, the paper relies on standard assumptions from behavioral economics and psychology without introducing new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the central argument invokes the existence of context-dependent goals and conflict resolution as background domain assumptions.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Travelers activate context-dependent goals (hedonic, gain, normative) that can conflict and require sequential resolution.
    Invoked in the abstract as the core distinction of GPT from RUM/RRM.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5746 in / 1304 out tokens · 42908 ms · 2026-06-30T02:36:07.654425+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

125 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2000 , publisher=

    Stated choice methods: analysis and applications , author=. 2000 , publisher=

    2000

  2. [2]

    Domencich, T. A. and McFadden, D. , year=. Urban Travel Demand - A Behavioral Analysis , url=

  3. [3]

    Transportation Research Part B: Methodological , author=

    The generalized nested logit model , volume=. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological , author=. 2001 , month=aug, pages=. doi:10.1016/S0191-2615(00)00045-X , number=

    work page doi:10.1016/s0191-2615(00)00045-x 2001

  4. [4]

    Transportation Research Part B: Methodological , DOI=

    A Random Regret-Minimization model of travel choice , year=. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological , DOI=

  5. [5]

    Decision field theory: Improvements to current methodology and comparisons with standard choice modelling techniques , volume=

    Hancock, Thomas O and Hess, Stephane and Choudhury, Charisma F , year=. Decision field theory: Improvements to current methodology and comparisons with standard choice modelling techniques , volume=. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2017.11.004 , journal=

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trb.2017.11.004 2017

  6. [6]

    Transportation Research Part B: Methodological , author=

    An accumulation of preference: Two alternative dynamic models for understanding transport choices , volume=. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological , author=. 2021 , month=jul, pages=. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2021.04.001 , abstractNote=

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trb.2021.04.001 2021

  7. [7]

    Transportation Research Part B: Methodological , author=

    Quantum probability: A new method for modelling travel behaviour , volume=. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological , author=. 2020 , month=sep, pages=. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2020.05.014 , abstractNote=

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trb.2020.05.014 2020

  8. [8]

    Transportation Research Part B: Methodological , author=

    Rational inattention in discrete choice models: Estimable specifications of RI-multinomial logit (RI-MNL) and RI-nested logit (RI-NL) models , volume=. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological , author=. 2023 , month=jun, pages=. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2023.03.010 , abstractNote=

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trb.2023.03.010 2023

  9. [9]

    Transportation , volume=

    Modelling daily activity program generation considering within-day and day-to-day dynamics in activity-travel behaviour , author=. Transportation , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

    2008

  10. [10]

    Transportation Research Record , volume=

    Comprehensive econometric microsimulator for daily activity-travel patterns , author=. Transportation Research Record , volume=. 2004 , publisher=

    2004

  11. [11]

    Transportation Research Part B: Methodological , volume=

    A learning-based transportation oriented simulation system , author=. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological , volume=. 2004 , publisher=

    2004

  12. [12]

    Transportation , volume=

    Changing the timing of activities in resolving scheduling conflicts , author=. Transportation , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  13. [13]

    Duke University

    The conceptual representation and measurement of psychological forces , volume=. Duke University. Contributions to Psychological Theory , author=. 1938 , pages=

    1938

  14. [14]

    Intention, will and need , DOI=

    Lewin, Kurt , year=. Intention, will and need , DOI=. Organization and pathology of thought: Selected sources , publisher=

  15. [15]

    Goal Framing as a Tool for Changing People’s Car Travel Behavior in Sweden , volume=

    Westin, Kerstin and Nordlund, Annika and Jansson, Johan and Nilsson, Jonas , year=. Goal Framing as a Tool for Changing People’s Car Travel Behavior in Sweden , volume=. Sustainability , publisher=. doi:10.3390/su12093695 , abstractNote=

    work page doi:10.3390/su12093695

  16. [16]

    Transportation , author=

    Do supra-modal traveller types exist? A travel behaviour market segmentation using Goal framing theory , volume=. Transportation , author=. 2020 , month=feb, pages=. doi:10.1007/s11116-018-9874-7 , abstractNote=

    work page doi:10.1007/s11116-018-9874-7 2020

  17. [17]

    Perceptual and motor skills , author=

    Goal Priming and Self-Efficacy: Independent Contributions to Motor Performance , volume=. Perceptual and motor skills , author=. 2009 , month=may, pages=. doi:10.2466/PMS.108.2.383-391 , abstractNote=

    work page doi:10.2466/pms.108.2.383-391 2009

  18. [18]

    Encouraging Sustainable Behavior: Psychology and the Environment , author=

    Goal-framing theory and norm-guided environmental behavior , DOI=. Encouraging Sustainable Behavior: Psychology and the Environment , author=. 2013 , month=jan, pages=

    2013

  19. [19]

    International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics , author=

    Intrinsic motivation, norms and environmental behaviour: The dynamics of overarching goals , volume=. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics , author=. 2016 , pages=. doi:10.1561/101.00000077 , abstractNote=

    work page doi:10.1561/101.00000077 2016

  20. [20]

    Journal of Political Economy , author=

    A New Approach to Consumer Theory , ISBN=. Journal of Political Economy , author=. doi:10.1086/259131 , abstractNote=

    work page doi:10.1086/259131

  21. [21]

    and Scheier, Michael F

    Carver, Charles S. and Scheier, Michael F. , year=. On the self-regulation of behavior , ISBN=. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139174794 , abstractNote=

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174794

  22. [22]

    and Scheier, Michael F

    Carver, Charles S. and Scheier, Michael F. , year=. Self-regulation of action and affect , ISBN=. Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications, 2nd ed , publisher=

  23. [23]

    Journal of Consumer Research , author=

    A Goal-Based Model of Product Evaluation and Choice , volume=. Journal of Consumer Research , author=. 2012 , month=aug, pages=. doi:10.1086/662643 , abstractNote=

    work page doi:10.1086/662643 2012

  24. [24]

    Michael and Shanteau, James , year=

    Troutman, C. Michael and Shanteau, James , year=. Do consumers evaluate products by adding or averaging attribute information? , volume=. Journal of Consumer Research , publisher=. doi:10.1086/208657 , abstractNote=

    work page doi:10.1086/208657

  25. [25]

    and Little, John D

    Guadagni, Peter M. and Little, John D. C. , year=. A Logit Model of Brand Choice Calibrated on Scanner Data , volume=. Marketing Science , publisher=

  26. [26]

    and Srinivasan, V

    Green, Paul E. and Srinivasan, V. , year=. Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook , volume=. Journal of Consumer Research , publisher=

  27. [27]

    Cannon, W. B. , year=. The wisdom of the body , abstractNote=

  28. [28]

    Priming and authorship ascription: When nonconscious goals turn into conscious experiences of self-agency , volume=

    Aarts, Henk and Custers, Ruud and Marien, Hans , year=. Priming and authorship ascription: When nonconscious goals turn into conscious experiences of self-agency , volume=. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , publisher=. doi:10.1037/a0015000 , abstractNote=

    work page doi:10.1037/a0015000

  29. [29]

    Positive Affect as Implicit Motivator: On the Nonconscious Operation of Behavioral Goals , volume=

    Custers, Ruud and Aarts, Henk , year=. Positive Affect as Implicit Motivator: On the Nonconscious Operation of Behavioral Goals , volume=. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , publisher=. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.2.129 , abstractNote=

    work page doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.2.129

  30. [30]

    Social and Personality Psychology Compass , author=

    The pursuit of multiple goals , volume=. Social and Personality Psychology Compass , author=. 2020 , pages=. doi:10.1111/spc3.12509 , abstractNote=

    work page doi:10.1111/spc3.12509 2020

  31. [31]

    McGregor, Ian and Little, Brian R. , year=. Personal projects, happiness, and meaning: On doing well and being yourself , volume=. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , publisher=. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.494 , abstractNote=

    work page doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.494

  32. [32]

    and Kasser, Tim , year=

    Sheldon, Kennon M. and Kasser, Tim , year=. Coherence and congruence: Two aspects of personality integration , volume=. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , publisher=. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.3.531 , abstractNote=

    work page doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.3.531

  33. [33]

    and Read, Stephen J

    Talevich, Jennifer R. and Read, Stephen J. and Walsh, David A. and Iyer, Ravi and Chopra, Gurveen , year=. Toward a comprehensive taxonomy of human motives , volume=. PLoS ONE , publisher=. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0172279 , abstractNote=

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0172279

  34. [34]

    Förster, Jens and Liberman, Nira and Friedman, Ronald S. , year=. Seven Principles of Goal Activation: A Systematic Approach to Distinguishing Goal Priming From Priming of Non-Goal Constructs , volume=. Personality and Social Psychology Review , publisher=. doi:10.1177/1088868307303029 , abstractNote=

    work page doi:10.1177/1088868307303029

  35. [35]

    Journal of Mathematical Psychology , author=

    Probabilistic choice (models) as a result of balancing multiple goals , volume=. Journal of Mathematical Psychology , author=. 2013 , month=feb, pages=. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2013.03.003 , abstractNote=

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2013.03.003 2013

  36. [36]

    Psychological bulletin , author=

    Control theory: A useful conceptual framework for personality-social, clinical, and health psychology , volume=. Psychological bulletin , author=. 1982 , month=jul, pages=. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.92.1.111 , abstractNote=

    work page doi:10.1037/0033-2909.92.1.111 1982

  37. [37]

    Applied Psychology , author=

    Moving from Cognition to Action: A Control Theory Perspective , volume=. Applied Psychology , author=. 1994 , pages=. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.1994.tb00828.x , number=

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.1994.tb00828.x 1994

  38. [38]

    Psychometrika , author=

    Additive similarity trees , volume=. Psychometrika , author=. 1977 , month=sep, pages=. doi:10.1007/BF02293654 , abstractNote=

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02293654 1977

  39. [39]

    Customer Needs and Solutions , author=

    Individuals’ Decisions in the Presence of Multiple Goals , volume=. Customer Needs and Solutions , author=. 2018 , month=mar, pages=. doi:10.1007/s40547-017-0071-1 , abstractNote=

    work page doi:10.1007/s40547-017-0071-1 2018

  40. [40]

    Journal of Business Research , author=

    An integrated modelling approach examining the influence of goals, habit and learning on choice using visual attention data , volume=. Journal of Business Research , author=. 2020 , month=sep, pages=. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.04.040 , abstractNote=

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.04.040 2020

  41. [41]

    Modeling simultaneous multiple goal pursuit and adaptation in consumer choice , volume=

    Swait, Joffre and Argo, Jennifer and Li, Lianhua , year=. Modeling simultaneous multiple goal pursuit and adaptation in consumer choice , volume=. Journal of Marketing Research , publisher=. doi:10.1509/jmr.14.0102 , abstractNote=

    work page doi:10.1509/jmr.14.0102

  42. [42]

    Environmental and Resource Economics , author=

    Antecedent Volition and Spatial Effects: Can Multiple Goal Pursuit Mitigate Distance Decay? , volume=. Environmental and Resource Economics , author=. 2020 , month=feb, pages=. doi:10.1007/s10640-019-00344-9 , abstractNote=

    work page doi:10.1007/s10640-019-00344-9 2020

  43. [43]

    and Swait, J

    Marley, A.A.J. and Swait, J. , year=. Goal-based models for discrete choice analysis , volume=. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2017.03.005 , journal=

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trb.2017.03.005 2017

  44. [44]

    and Hardt, Nino and Allenby, Greg M

    Kim, Dong Soo and Bailey, Roger A. and Hardt, Nino and Allenby, Greg M. , year=. Benefit-Based Conjoint Analysis , volume=. Marketing Science , publisher=. doi:10.1287/mksc.2016.1003 , abstractNote=

    work page doi:10.1287/mksc.2016.1003 2016

  45. [45]

    Destination Choice Models for Rock Climbing in the Northeastern Alps: A Latent-Class Approach Based on Intensity of Preferences , volume=

    Scarpa, Riccardo and Thiene, Mara , year=. Destination Choice Models for Rock Climbing in the Northeastern Alps: A Latent-Class Approach Based on Intensity of Preferences , volume=. Land Economics , publisher=

  46. [46]

    IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics , author=

    On a Bicriterion Formulation of the Problems of Integrated System Identification and System Optimization , volume=. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics , author=. 1971 , month=jul, pages=. doi:10.1109/TSMC.1971.4308298 , abstractNote=

    work page doi:10.1109/tsmc.1971.4308298 1971

  47. [47]

    Chiandussi, Giorgio and Codegone, Marco and Ferrero, Simone and Varesio, F.E. , year=. Comparison of multi-objective optimization methodologies for engineering applications , volume=. doi:10.1016/j.camwa.2011.11.057 , abstractNote=

    work page doi:10.1016/j.camwa.2011.11.057 2011

  48. [48]

    Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science , author=

    Regret Minimization or Utility Maximization: It Depends on the Attribute - Caspar G Chorus, John M Rose, David A Hensher, 2013 , volume=. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science , author=. 2013 , pages=

    2013

  49. [49]

    Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.Econometrica 1979,47, 263–292

    Kahneman, Daniel and Tversky, Amos , year=. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk , volume=. Econometrica , publisher=. doi:10.2307/1914185 , abstractNote=

    work page doi:10.2307/1914185

  50. [50]

    and Bansal, Prateek , year=

    Krueger, Rico and Bierlaire, Michel and Daziano, Ricardo and Rashidi, Taha H. and Bansal, Prateek , year=. Evaluating the predictive abilities of mixed logit models with unobserved inter- and intra-individual heterogeneity , volume=. doi:10.1016/j.jocm.2021.100323 , journal=

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jocm.2021.100323 2021

  51. [51]

    Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice , author=

    Impact of information intervention on travel mode choice of urban residents with different goal frames: A controlled trial in Xuzhou, China , volume=. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice , author=. 2016 , month=sep, pages=. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2016.06.031 , abstractNote=

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tra.2016.06.031 2016

  52. [52]

    Transportation , author=

    Values, attitudes and travel behavior: a hierarchical latent variable mixed logit model of travel mode choice , volume=. Transportation , author=. 2014 , month=jul, pages=. doi:10.1007/s11116-013-9504-3 , abstractNote=

    work page doi:10.1007/s11116-013-9504-3 2014

  53. [53]

    Electric Vehicle Range Anxiety: An Obstacle for the Personal Transportation (R)evolution? , booktitle=

    Pevec, Dario and Babic, Jurica and Carvalho, Arthur and Ghiassi-Farrokhfal, Yashar and Ketter, Wolfgang and Podobnik, Vedran , year=. Electric Vehicle Range Anxiety: An Obstacle for the Personal Transportation (R)evolution? , booktitle=. doi:10.23919/SpliTech.2019.8783178 , abstractNote=

    work page doi:10.23919/splitech.2019.8783178 2019

  54. [54]

    Energy.gov , author=

    FOTW 1221, January 17, 2022: Model Year 2021 All-Electric Vehicles Had a Median Driving Range about 60\. Energy.gov , author=. 2022 , language=

    2022

  55. [55]

    InsideEVs , author=

    How Much Does The Powertrain Represent Out Of Total Cost For An EV? , url=. InsideEVs , author=. 2020 , language=

    2020

  56. [56]

    Nature , author=

    Make electric vehicles lighter to maximize climate and safety benefits , volume=. Nature , author=. 2021 , month=oct, pages=. doi:10.1038/d41586-021-02760-8 , abstractNote=

    work page doi:10.1038/d41586-021-02760-8 2021

  57. [57]

    American Public Power Association , author=

    Machine Learning Can Help Speed EV Charging, Idaho Lab Researchers Say | American Public Power Association , url=. American Public Power Association , author=

  58. [58]

    Bloomberg , author=

    Long-Range EVs Now Cost Less Than the Average US New Car - Bloomberg , url=. Bloomberg , author=

  59. [59]

    Current Psychology , author=

    The influence of affect and goal priming on decision search behavior , volume=. Current Psychology , author=. 2022 , month=sep, pages=. doi:10.1007/s12144-020-01048-w , abstractNote=

    work page doi:10.1007/s12144-020-01048-w 2022

  60. [60]

    The Significance of Hedonic Values for Environmentally Relevant Attitudes, Preferences, and Actions , volume=

    Steg, Linda and Perlaviciute, Goda and van der Werff, Ellen and Lurvink, Judith , year=. The Significance of Hedonic Values for Environmentally Relevant Attitudes, Preferences, and Actions , volume=. Environment and Behavior , publisher=. doi:10.1177/0013916512454730 , abstractNote=

    work page doi:10.1177/0013916512454730

  61. [61]

    Review of General Psychology , author=

    Sequential and Concurrent Strategies of Multiple Goal Pursuit , volume=. Review of General Psychology , author=. 2013 , month=sep, pages=. doi:10.1037/a0032584 , abstractNote=

    work page doi:10.1037/a0032584 2013

  62. [62]

    and McCarley, Jason S

    Wickens, Christopher D. and McCarley, Jason S. , year=. Applied Attention Theory , url=

  63. [63]

    Journal of Experimental Psychology

    Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching , volume=. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance , author=. 2001 , month=aug, pages=. doi:10.1037//0096-1523.27.4.763 , abstractNote=

    work page doi:10.1037//0096-1523.27.4.763 2001

  64. [64]

    Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice , author=

    A model for integrated analysis of household location and travel choices , volume=. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice , author=. 2000 , pages=. doi:10.1016/S0965-8564(99)00038-5 , abstractNote=

    work page doi:10.1016/s0965-8564(99)00038-5 2000

  65. [65]

    A framework for transportation and land use integration as a parallel constrained multiple discrete-continuous extreme value (PC-MDCEV) home production model , volume=

    Hawkins, Jason and Nurul Habib, Khandker , year=. A framework for transportation and land use integration as a parallel constrained multiple discrete-continuous extreme value (PC-MDCEV) home production model , volume=. Transportmetrica B: Transport Dynamics , publisher=. doi:10.1080/21680566.2024.2303042 , abstractNote=

    work page doi:10.1080/21680566.2024.2303042 2024

  66. [66]

    Salvini, Paul and Miller, Eric J. , year=. ILUTE: An operational prototype of a comprehensive microsimulation model of urban systems , volume=. Networks and Spatial Economics , publisher=. doi:10.1007/s11067-005-2630-5 , abstractNote=

    work page doi:10.1007/s11067-005-2630-5

  67. [67]

    Transportation , author=

    The TimeUse+ data set: 4 weeks of time use and expenditure data based on GPS tracks , ISSN=. Transportation , author=. 2024 , month=aug, language=. doi:10.1007/s11116-024-10517-1 , abstractNote=

    work page doi:10.1007/s11116-024-10517-1 2024

  68. [68]

    Transportation Planning and Technology , author=

    Unraveling the relationship between trip chaining and mode choice: evidence from a multi-week travel diary , volume=. Transportation Planning and Technology , author=. 2012 , month=jun, pages=. doi:10.1080/03081060.2012.680812 , number=

    work page doi:10.1080/03081060.2012.680812 2012

  69. [69]

    Transport Policy , author=

    Understanding attitudes towards public transport and private car: A qualitative study , volume=. Transport Policy , author=. 2007 , month=nov, pages=. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.04.009 , abstractNote=

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.04.009 2007

  70. [70]

    The Atlantic , author=

    Race, Class, and the Stigma of Riding the Bus in America , url=. The Atlantic , author=

  71. [71]

    and Azevedo, Carlos Miguel Lima and Basak, Kakali and Lovric, Milan and Raveau, Sebastián and Zhu, Yi and Ferreira, Joseph and Zegras, Christopher and Ben-Akiva, Moshe , year=

    Adnan, Muhammad and Pereira, Francisco C. and Azevedo, Carlos Miguel Lima and Basak, Kakali and Lovric, Milan and Raveau, Sebastián and Zhu, Yi and Ferreira, Joseph and Zegras, Christopher and Ben-Akiva, Moshe , year=. Simmobility: A multi-scale integrated agent-based simulation platform , volume=. 95th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board ...

  72. [72]

    Decision , author=

    Not Just Noise: A Goal Pursuit Interpretation of Stochastic Choice , volume=. Decision , author=. 2018 , pages=. doi:10.1037/dec0000077 , number=

    work page doi:10.1037/dec0000077 2018

  73. [73]

    Journal of Marketing Research , author=

    A Choice Model of Utility Maximization and Regret Minimization , volume=. Journal of Marketing Research , author=. 2022 , month=dec, pages=. doi:10.1177/00222437221094824 , abstractNote=

    work page doi:10.1177/00222437221094824 2022

  74. [74]

    Marley, A. A. J. and Flynn, Terry N. and Louviere, J. J. , year=. Probabilistic models of set-dependent and attribute-level best-worst choice , volume=. Journal of Mathematical Psychology , publisher=. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2008.02.002 , abstractNote=

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2008.02.002 2008

  75. [75]

    and Bargh, John A

    Chartrand, Tanya L. and Bargh, John A. , year=. The chameleon effect: The perception–behavior link and social interaction , volume=. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , publisher=. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.893 , abstractNote=

    work page doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.893

  76. [76]

    Can we ever obtain the data we would like to have? , booktitle=

    Axhausen, Kay , year=. Can we ever obtain the data we would like to have? , booktitle=

  77. [77]

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , author=

    Personal Strivings: An Approach to Personality and Subjective Weil-Being , volume=. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , author=. 1986 , pages=

    1986

  78. [78]

    Transportation , author=

    Habitual travel behaviour: Evidence from a six-week travel diary , volume=. Transportation , author=. 2003 , pages=

    2003

  79. [79]

    and Little, Brian R

    Palys, Ted S. and Little, Brian R. , year=. Perceived life satisfaction and the organization of personal project systems , volume=. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , publisher=. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.6.1221 , abstractNote=

    work page doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.6.1221

  80. [80]

    Transportation Research Record , author=

    Prototype Model of Household Activity-Travel Scheduling , volume=. Transportation Research Record , author=. 2003 , pages=. doi:10.3141/1831-13 , abstractNote=

    work page doi:10.3141/1831-13 2003

Showing first 80 references.