Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

Internal replication as a tool for evaluating reproducibility in preclinical experiments

As of 8 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 16 of 16 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2506.03468.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2506.03468 v1

Coverage vector

measured 16 of 16 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-07T11:07:34.893570Z

measured 16 of 16 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00

measured 0 of 0 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: cited_works

Reference resolution

16 of 16 outbound references displayed

verified exact11
verified fuzzy0
unresolved5
parse uncertain0
malformed identifier0
metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

Observation 297e328e-9ab4-4a65-ad1f-95a12f7c8acc · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Internal replication as a tool for evaluating reproducibility in preclinical experiments Unresolved cited work

Reference 8

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-07T11:07:35.115676Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.

Observation 06ccf7d8-bd2e-47c0-92bf-aafbe580347c · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Internal replication as a tool for evaluating reproducibility in preclinical experiments Unresolved cited work

Reference 13

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-07T11:07:35.015228Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.

Observation ce2139c4-e2e7-4b65-9e50-80da555d0a8a · outbound

This paper cites doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73503-4.

Internal replication as a tool for evaluating reproducibility in preclinical experiments doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73503-4

Reference 16

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-07T11:07:34.947976Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.

Observation 00849924-e8bd-4193-91d2-b7009bbf5c5e · outbound

This paper cites doi: 10.2307/2983667.

Internal replication as a tool for evaluating reproducibility in preclinical experiments doi: 10.2307/2983667

Reference 1936

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-07T11:07:35.199201Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.

Observation 2e8777bb-2f01-426b-a976-9cd16d97eabc · outbound

This paper cites Open Science Collaboration.

Internal replication as a tool for evaluating reproducibility in preclinical experiments Open Science Collaboration

Reference 2007

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-07T11:07:35.074472Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.

Observation ea69cc35-1208-4f94-8265-defe05688135 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Internal replication as a tool for evaluating reproducibility in preclinical experiments Unresolved cited work

Reference 2008

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-07T11:07:34.967848Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.

Observation bb37dc6f-8f6f-4320-8104-37a58d450591 · outbound

This paper cites doi: 10.1038/nature08221.

Internal replication as a tool for evaluating reproducibility in preclinical experiments doi: 10.1038/nature08221

Reference 2009

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-07T11:07:35.164718Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.

Observation 6a2425c4-185c-415c-a84c-87a66d9062cc · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Internal replication as a tool for evaluating reproducibility in preclinical experiments Unresolved cited work

Reference 2010

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-07T11:07:34.989768Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.

Observation 1b37ba42-2d06-4917-ab76-fc7f770b3de7 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Internal replication as a tool for evaluating reproducibility in preclinical experiments Unresolved cited work

Reference 2011

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T11:07:34.871683Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation c53936f2-fdd8-4d4a-9a5a-fb8a55db7701 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Internal replication as a tool for evaluating reproducibility in preclinical experiments Unresolved cited work

Reference 2012

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T11:07:34.802142Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation ce098fbb-be4c-4586-bcdf-9d1a48f57a35 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Internal replication as a tool for evaluating reproducibility in preclinical experiments Unresolved cited work

Reference 2013

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-07T11:07:35.096163Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.

Observation 164fd32a-283c-4b62-aecd-671f850a2b89 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Internal replication as a tool for evaluating reproducibility in preclinical experiments Unresolved cited work

Reference 2015

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T11:07:34.866251Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 070a0c52-b694-4c3e-ad39-095287e5d666 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Internal replication as a tool for evaluating reproducibility in preclinical experiments Unresolved cited work

Reference 2018

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T11:07:34.814214Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation d377f096-fd35-4d1e-99b4-034952337f3c · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Internal replication as a tool for evaluating reproducibility in preclinical experiments Unresolved cited work

Reference 2019

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-07T11:07:35.257997Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.

Observation 4bf04e71-1230-4827-90e1-7cf65e4df1a8 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Internal replication as a tool for evaluating reproducibility in preclinical experiments Unresolved cited work

Reference 2020

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-07T11:07:35.137412Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.

Observation 939a9ea5-9850-4013-982b-012c7b1de244 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Internal replication as a tool for evaluating reproducibility in preclinical experiments Unresolved cited work

Reference 2021

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T11:07:34.821729Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Pith citing papers

No inbound Pith citation observations are available.