Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Objective task-based evaluation of artificial intelligence-based medical imaging methods: Framework, strategies and role of the physician

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2107.04540 v2 pith:DLVWLSIG submitted 2021-07-09 physics.med-ph eess.IV

classification physics.med-pheess.IV
keywords methodsevaluationframeworkartificialmedical-imagingobjectiveotherrole
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI)-based methods are showing promise in multiple medical-imaging applications. Thus, there is substantial interest in clinical translation of these methods, requiring in turn, that they be evaluated rigorously. In this paper, our goal is to lay out a framework for objective task-based evaluation of AI methods. We will also provide a list of tools available in the literature to conduct this evaluation. Further, we outline the important role of physicians in conducting these evaluation studies. The examples in this paper will be proposed in the context of PET with a focus on neural-network-based methods. However, the framework is also applicable to evaluate other medical-imaging modalities and other types of AI methods.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools