Pith. sign in

REVIEW

The size-luminosity relation of lensed galaxies at $z=6-9$ in the Hubble Frontier Fields

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2201.08858 v1 pith:DM2JHGOM submitted 2022-01-21 astro-ph.GA

classification astro-ph.GA
keywords galaxiessize-luminosityfieldsrelationbetalensedblankconsistent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We measure the size-luminosity relation of photometrically-selected galaxies within the redshift range $z\sim6-9$, using galaxies lensed by six foreground Hubble Frontier Fields (HFF) clusters. The power afforded by strong gravitational lensing allows us to observe fainter and smaller galaxies than in blank fields. We select our sample of galaxies and obtain their properties, e.g., redshift, magnitude, from the photometrically-derived ASTRODEEP catalogues. The intrinsic size is measured with the Lenstruction software, and completeness maps are created as a function of size and luminosity via the GLACiAR2 software. We perform a Bayesian analysis to estimate the intrinsic and incompleteness-corrected size-luminosity distribution, with parameterization $r_e \propto L^\beta$. We find slopes of $\beta\sim0.48\pm0.08$ at $z\sim6-7$ and $\beta\sim0.68\pm0.14$ at $z\sim8.5$, adopting the Bradac lens model. The slope derived by lensed galaxies is steeper than that obtained in blank fields and is consistent with other independent determinations of the size-luminosity relation from the HFF dataset. We also investigate the systematic uncertainties correlated with the choice of lens models, finding that the slopes of size-luminosity relations derived from different models are consistent with each other, i.e. the modeling errors are not a significant source of uncertainty in the size-luminosity relation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools