Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 38 references

Space-Time Coded RIS-Assisted Wireless Systems with Practical Reflection Models: Error Rate Analysis and Negative Moment-Based Optimization with Saddle Point Approximation

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that symbol error rates for space-time-coded RIS links reduce to the distribution of a single eigenvalue of the cascaded channel, and that the asymptotic coding gain is controlled by this eigenvalue's Nt-th negative moment.

desk verdict Genuinely useful SER/optimization toolkit for OSTBC RIS links, but Eq. (3) is misprinted and makes the practical-model validation unreproducible as written; the math survives, the optimization comparison needs a fairer baseline. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.19129 v1 pith:DMDP5FY7 submitted 2025-08-26 eess.SP

Tayfun Yilmaz , Haci Ilhan , Ibrahim Hokelek This is my paper
classification eess.SP
keywords ReconfigurableintelligentsurfacesOrthogonalspace-timeblockcodesSymbolerrorrateSaddlepointapproximationNegativemomentsCodinggainPhase-dependentamplituderesponseEigenvaluedistribution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the symbol error rate of an RIS-assisted link running orthogonal space-time block codes can be written in closed form even when the RIS elements have practical, phase-dependent reflection amplitudes and coarse quantized phase steps. The key reduction is that, because the cascaded transmitter-RIS-receiver channel has rank one, the entire SNR statistics reduce to one number: the nonzero eigenvalue of the RIS-receiver Gram matrix, which is a weighted sum of the per-element reflected powers. For small RISs the paper gives exact MGF expressions; for large RISs it shows that a saddle point approximation reproduces the eigenvalue density accurately enough that the same SER formulas hold at any size. It then proves that the asymptotic coding gain is inversely proportional to the Nt-th negative moment of that eigenvalue's density, so minimizing E[lambda^{-Nt}] is a low-complexity proxy for optimizing the RIS phase configuration. A reader would care because it turns error-rate prediction and RIS tuning for space-time-coded systems into a tractable calculation that matches simulation without Monte Carlo runs.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the rank-one Gram matrix Phi^dagger g^dagger g Phi of the RIS-receiver channel. Its single nonzero eigenvalue is lambda = sum_i beta_i^2(phi_i) |g_i|^2, a sum of independent exponentials with rates 1/beta_i^2, which is Erlang when the amplitude responses are identical and hypoexponential when they are not. Because the transmitter-side channel matrix is unitarily invariant, Z/lambda is Gamma(Nt, 1), so all SER calculations reduce to the moment-generating function of lambda. The saddle point approximation supplies a tractable density for lambda at arbitrary RIS size: it uses the cumulant generating function psi(s) = -sum_i log(1 - s beta_i^2(phi_i)) with saddle point

What would settle it

Take an RIS-assisted OSTBC link with N_RIS = 10 and place adjacent RIS elements closer than half a wavelength so that the channel vector g becomes spatially correlated, keeping everything else identical; compare the measured or simulated SER with the paper's exact formula of Eq. (30) or the SPA-based expression. The derivation assumes spatially independent fading, so under correlation lambda is no longer a sum of independent exponentials and the predicted SER curves should visibly diverge from simulation in the high-SNR regime.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that for OSTBC transmission through a rank-one RIS cascaded channel, the instantaneous SNR takes the form rho = (PL/R_c) rho_bar Z, where Z is the unique nonzero eigenvalue of f^dagger f and is statistically equivalent to lambda times the squared norm of an Nt-dimensional standard Gaussian vector; conditionally on lambda, Z/lambda is Gamma(Nt, 1). The paper derives exact PDF and MGF expressions for Z under both identical and non-identical phase-dependent amplitude responses, using Erlang and hypoexponential structures for lambda. For large RIS sizes it substitutes a saddle point approximation for the density of lambda, yielding a unified MGF-based SER formula for arbitra

Load-bearing premise

Every result assumes the transmitter-RIS and RIS-receiver fading gains are independent, zero-mean complex Gaussian with unit variance, so that each |g_i|^2 is an exponential and the phase shifts affect the SNR only through the reflected amplitudes; drop that assumption and the eigenvalue distribution no longer has the Erlang, hypoexponential, or saddle-point form used throughout.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Closed-form M-PSK SER curves become available for OSTBC schemes G2, G3, and G4 under both identical and non-identical, phase-dependent RIS reflection amplitudes, for small and large RIS sizes alike.
  • The diversity order remains Nt across all practical reflection models, so RIS amplitude impairments degrade only the coding gain, not the asymptotic slope of the error-rate curve.
  • The saddle-point-approximation-based MGF replaces Monte Carlo simulation for SER evaluation, and the paper demonstrates near-exact agreement with simulations for RIS sizes from 10 to 1000 elements.
  • RIS phase configuration can be formulated as minimizing E[lambda^{-Nt}], a cheap objective that avoids direct SER, outage, or ergodic-rate computations.
  • The ratio of the ideal coding gain to the practical coding gain is given by Gamma(NRIS - Nt)/(Gamma(NRIS) E[lambda^{-Nt}]), providing a measurable lower bound for the negative-moment objective.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same negative-moment surrogate should apply to other performance metrics that are monotone in the SNR distribution, such as outage probability or ergodic capacity, for rank-one RIS links.
  • If hardware measurements show that the amplitude response deviates from the sinusoidal model in Eq. (3), the framework still works as long as the per-element beta_i values are known, because the SPA and the negative-moment formulas depend only on those amplitudes.
  • The rank-one reduction is specific to the single-receive-antenna OSTBC structure; extending the approach to spatial multiplexing, correlated fading, or line-of-sight components would require a different eigenvalue analysis rather than a parameter adjustment.
  • The greedy grouped search becomes inaccurate when the group count is too small for large NRIS, suggesting that the negative-moment objective is smooth enough to support gradient-based or learned solvers as a natural follow-up.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes symbol error rate (SER) of an OSTBC-coded RIS-assisted system in which each RIS element has a phase-dependent reflection amplitude. By writing the instantaneous SNR as a rank-one quadratic form, the authors reduce the problem to the scalar eigenvalue λ = Σ β_i²(φ_i)|g_i|². For identical amplitudes they obtain an exact Erlang-based MGF (Eq. (21)); for non-identical amplitudes they give an exact hypoexponential MGF for small RIS (Eq. (30)) and a saddle-point approximation (SPA) for large RIS (Eqs. (34)-(37)). An asymptotic high-SNR analysis leads to a coding-gain formula expressed through the Nt-th negative moment of λ, which motivates a greedy RIS phase-configuration algorithm. Monte Carlo simulations are used throughout to validate the analytical SER expressions.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper provides useful closed-form SER expressions for RIS-assisted OSTBC systems under a practical amplitude-phase coupling model, and it proposes an interpretable optimization objective based on a negative moment rather than direct SER evaluation. The derivations are not curve-fitted; the SER validation is by independent Monte Carlo simulation, and the saddle-point and Tricomi-function reductions are standard. However, two issues materially affect the validity of the presentation: Eq. (3) as written is not a real-valued amplitude model for the phases used in the simulations, and the optimization objective is separable in the per-element amplitudes, so the proposed greedy search is unnecessary if the objective really is E[λ^{-Nt}]. Both are fixable, but they must be addressed before the claims can be accepted.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section II, Eq. (3)] The amplitude model as written is not real-valued on the stated domain. With ζmin=0.8, c=0.43π, k=1.6, the base sin(φ−c)/2 is negative at φ=0 and φ=3π/2, so β(φ) is complex, contradicting β∈[0,1]. At the stated maximum φ=π/2+c, the formula gives β=0.8+0.2·0.5^1.6≈0.866, not 1, contradicting the text in Section VI-C and Fig. 9. Since Eq. (3) is used in every simulation and in Algorithm 1, the reported numerical validation is not reproducible as written. The standard model has ((sin(φ−c)+1)/2)^k; the model, all simulations, and the statements about the optimum phase must be corrected consistently.
  2. [Section V, Algorithm 1 and Eqs. (34)-(40)] The negative-moment objective is separable in the per-element amplitudes. Since λ=Σ β_i²(φ_i)|g_i|² and E[λ^{-Nt}] = (1/Γ(Nt)) ∫_0^∞ t^{Nt-1} ∏_i (1+β_i² t)^{-1} dt, increasing any β_i² decreases E[λ^{-Nt}]. Therefore, over any phase codebook, the global optimum is obtained by independently choosing each φ_i to maximize β_i(φ_i)². The group-wise greedy search cannot beat this per-element solution, and the statement in Section V that the phase profile must be adjusted 'not only to maximize local amplitude responses but also to align with the overall objectives' is not supported by the model. The optimization contribution should be repositioned, or the algorithm should be compared against the trivial per-element amplitude maximizer.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Theorem 1, Eq. (14)] The PDF in (15) is Gamma(NRIS, scale β²(φ)), equivalently Erlang with shape NRIS and rate 1/β²(φ). The sentence 'k=1/β²(φ) denotes the shape parameter' is incorrect; NRIS is the shape parameter.
  2. [Theorem 2, Eq. (24)] The stated condition NRIS > Nt + 2 is stronger than needed. The first-order small-z asymptotic of U(a,b,z) used in (24) only requires b=NRIS−Nt+1>1, i.e., NRIS>Nt. This does not affect the reported parameter ranges, but the condition should be corrected.
  3. [Section IV-A, Theorem 3 / Corollary 4] The hypoexponential formulas in (28)-(30) require all β_i²(φ_i) to be distinct; the denominators vanish otherwise. Since quantized phase codebooks can produce equal amplitudes, the exact low-NRIS expressions are not directly applicable to such cases. The authors should state this limitation explicitly and, if needed, provide the repeated-parameter limit.
  4. [Eq. (40c) and Abstract] The relation is Gc ∝ (E[λ^{-Nt}])^{-1/Nt}, not simply 'inversely proportional to the Nt-th negative moment.' The wording in the abstract and Section IV-B4 should be made precise.
  5. [Algorithm 1 / Eq. (36)] Line 16 of Algorithm 1 says 'Evaluate E_λt[y^{-Nt}]' but does not specify how the SPA-based integral is computed. Given that ŝ depends on y through ψ'(ŝ)=y, the numerical quadrature details should be described or referenced.
  6. [Figs. 2 and Conclusion] The legend of Fig. 2 and the Conclusion use 'SAP' instead of 'SPA'. Please correct the acronym.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: derivations are algebraic consequences of the stated channel model and are validated by independent Monte Carlo simulation.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained and non-circular. The central object λ is defined as the nonzero eigenvalue of Φ†g†gΦ, and under the stated i.i.d. Rayleigh fading model, (12) gives λ as a sum of independent exponentials with rates 1/β_i^2(φ_i). Theorem 1 and Theorem 3 compute its exact PDF (Erlang/hypoexponential) by standard convolution; Corollaries 2, 4, 5, and 6 compute MGFs through recognized Laplace-transform identities. The SPA in Theorem 5 is applied to the exact cumulant generating function of λ, not to a fitted quantity. Theorem 6's coding-gain/negative-moment relation is an algebraic high-SNR expansion of the SPA-based MGF: after replacing (1+μ(s)y)^{-Nt} by (μ(s)y)^{-Nt}, the remaining integral is exactly E_fλ_SPA[Y^{-Nt}], so the proportionality is a theorem, not an assumed equivalence. The proposed optimization minimizes this same derived objective; its validity as a proxy for SER is independently checked by Monte Carlo simulations (Figs. 9–14) with random channel realizations, so the link is not definitional. There are no fitted constants, no load-bearing self-citations, and no imported uniqueness theorems. (Separately, the apparent missing '+1' in the reflection model (3) is a correctness/typo concern, but not a circularity issue.)

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on i.i.d. Rayleigh fading plus the practical amplitude model (3) and the ETSI near-field path loss. No new physical entity is introduced. The model constants zeta_min, c, k are inherited from prior hardware work but are hand-chosen inputs that set all numerical results. The unstated real-valued behavior of (3) for phases with negative sine is an ad hoc assumption the paper never declares.

free parameters (3)
  • Amplitude model constants (zeta_min, c, k) = zeta_min=0.8, c=0.43pi, k=1.6
    Hand-chosen hardware constants from the practical reflection model (3), taken from prior literature; not fitted to data, but they set the amplitude response that drives every numerical result, and (3) is complex-valued for the phases used in the paper's own simulations.
  • Path-loss geometry (dt, dr, near-field condition) = dt=dr=50 m, dNF=413.7 m
    Deployment inputs from the ETSI NFPL model (43); chosen to justify the near-field path-loss formula that sets the absolute SNR scale in all figures.
  • Quantized codebook size b and candidate count T = b=2, T=10^6
    Algorithm hyperparameters; b=2 fixes the phase set {0, pi/2, pi, 3pi/2}, T is the greedy search candidate count.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption H and g are i.i.d. CN(0,1) Rayleigh
    Stated in Section II; makes |g_i|^2 unit-mean exponentials and gives Z|lambda ~ Gamma(Nt,1); load-bearing for Theorems 1, 3, 4, 5.
  • standard math OSTBC instantaneous SNR is rho = (PL/Rc) rho_bar ||f||^2
    Standard OSTBC result from Tarokh et al. [9], used at Eq. (5).
  • domain assumption Lindeberg-Feller CLT conditions hold (no single beta_i^2 dominates)
    Appendix A, condition (A.4); needed for the LCLT approximation (Theorem 4), used as the fallback in Section IV-B.
  • standard math Daniels saddlepoint approximation is accurate for the hypoexponential density
    Theorem 5 and Appendix B; classical result [38], accuracy claimed for all NRIS and verified only for specific simulated sizes.
  • domain assumption Near-field path-loss model (43) from ETSI applies
    Section VI-A; justified by Fraunhofer distance estimate dNF about 414 m versus dt+dr=100 m; sets the absolute SNR in all figures.
  • ad hoc to paper Reflection amplitude model (3) is real-valued for all simulated phases
    As printed, (3) is complex for sin(phi-c)<0 (e.g., phi=0 with c=0.43pi); the paper uses such phases in Fig. 2 and the quantized-codebook simulations without stating a domain restriction or an absolute value, so the simulations must rely on an unstated variant of (3).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Space-Time Coded RIS-Assisted Wireless Systems with Practical Reflection Models: Error Rate Analysis and Negative Moment-Based Optimization with Saddle Point Approximation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DMDP5FY7

@misc{pith2026250819129,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Space-Time Coded RIS-Assisted Wireless Systems with Practical Reflection Models: Error Rate Analysis and Negative Moment-Based Optimization with Saddle Point Approximation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DMDP5FY7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.19129}
}
read the original abstract

RIS-assisted communication has recently attracted significant attention for enhancing wireless performance in challenging environments, making accurate error analysis under practical hardware constraints crucial for future multi-antenna systems. This paper presents a theoretical framework for SER analysis of RIS-assisted multiple antenna systems employing OSTBC under practical reflection models with amplitude-dependent and quantized phase responses. By exploiting the Gramian structure of the cascaded channel f, we derive exact MGF expressions of the nonzero eigenvalue of f'f for small RIS sizes. For large-scale RIS deployments, where closed-form analysis becomes intractable, we employ Saddle Point Approximation to approximate the eigenvalue distribution. Using these results, we derive unified SER expressions using exact and SPA-based MGF formulations, applicable to arbitrary RIS sizes, phase configuration, and both identical and non-identical amplitude responses. Extensive Monte Carlo simulations confirm the accuracy of the proposed SER expressions, demonstrating very close agreement for all configurations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.19129 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Proposed space-time coded RIS-assisted multiple-antenna system model. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparison of the LCLT and SPA-based approximation of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Comparison of negative moment values achieved by the proposed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: SER performance for different OSTBC schemes, evaluated for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: SER performance for different NRIS values (ϕn = 3π/4). In the considered simulation scenarios, the coordinate differ￾ences are set as dtx = drx = 30 m and dty = dry = 40 m. Accordingly, dt = dr = 50 m. The geometric meaning of these coordinate differences, such as dtx …
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: SER performance for uniformly distributed and optimal phase shift [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: SER performance RIS-assisted Alamouti STBC scheme under [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_11.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: SER performance comparison of the proposed optimization al [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_13.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Toward smart wireless communications via intelligent reflect- ing surfaces: A contemporary survey,

    S. Gong, X. Lu, D. T. Hoang, D. Niyato, L. Shu, D. I. Kim, and Y . Liang, “Toward smart wireless communications via intelligent reflect- ing surfaces: A contemporary survey,” IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 2283–2314, 2020

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    Smart radio environments empowered by reconfig- urable intelligent surfaces: How it works, state of research, and the road ahead,

    M. D. Renzo, A. Zappone, M. Debbah, M. Alouini, C. Yuen, J. de Rosny, and S. Tretyakov, “Smart radio environments empowered by reconfig- urable intelligent surfaces: How it works, state of research, and the road ahead,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications , vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 2450–2525, 2020

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    Next-generation RIS: From single to multiple functions,

    A. Zheng, W. Ni, W. Wang, and H. Tian, “Next-generation RIS: From single to multiple functions,” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters , vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 1988–1992, 2023

    work page 1988

  4. [4]

    Secrecy rate maximization for active reconfigurable intelligent surface assisted MIMO systems,

    B. Gao, J. Zhao, S. Yan, and S. Xiao, “Secrecy rate maximization for active reconfigurable intelligent surface assisted MIMO systems,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 87 097–87 109, 2024

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Ergodic rate analysis of reconfigurable intelligent surface-aided massive MIMO systems with ZF detectors,

    K. Zhi, C. Pan, H. Ren, and K. Wang, “Ergodic rate analysis of reconfigurable intelligent surface-aided massive MIMO systems with ZF detectors,” IEEE Communications Letters , vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 264–268, 2022

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    A sur- vey on optimization for reconfigurable intelligent surfaces—modeling, algorithms, and future directions,

    G. Zhou, X. Yu, Y . Xu, Y . Lu, D. W. K. Ng, and R. Schober, “A sur- vey on optimization for reconfigurable intelligent surfaces—modeling, algorithms, and future directions,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1341–1375, 2023

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Indoor measurements for RIS-aided communication: Practical phase shift optimization, coverage enhancement, and physical layer security,

    S. Kayraklik, I. Yildirim, I. Hokelek, Y . Gevez, E. Basar, and A. Gorcin, “Indoor measurements for RIS-aided communication: Practical phase shift optimization, coverage enhancement, and physical layer security,” IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society , vol. 5, pp. 1243– 1255, 2024

    2024

  8. [8]

    Reconfigurable intelligent surface-based index modulation: A new beyond MIMO paradigm for 6G,

    E. Basar, “Reconfigurable intelligent surface-based index modulation: A new beyond MIMO paradigm for 6G,” IEEE Transactions on Commu- nications, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 3187–3196, 2020

    work page 2020

Show all 38 references
  1. [9]

    Space-time block codes from orthogonal designs,

    V . Tarokh, H. Jafarkhani, and A. R. Calderbank, “Space-time block codes from orthogonal designs,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 1456–1467, 1999

    1999

  2. [10]

    Reconfigurable intelligent surface-empowered MIMO systems,

    A. Khaleel and E. Basar, “Reconfigurable intelligent surface-empowered MIMO systems,” IEEE Systems Journal, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 4358–4366, 2021

    2021

  3. [11]

    GSTBC-SM assisted high diversity reconfigurable intelligent surface systems,

    M. Peng, L. Xiao, Z. Niu, G. Liu, and T. Jiang, “GSTBC-SM assisted high diversity reconfigurable intelligent surface systems,” IEEE Trans- actions on Communications , vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 1814–1826, 2023

    2023

  4. [12]

    Performance Analysis of Reconfigurable In- telligent Surface Assisted STBC and DSTBC Systems,

    Y . Sun and D.-W. Yue, “Performance Analysis of Reconfigurable In- telligent Surface Assisted STBC and DSTBC Systems,” IEEE Systems Journal, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 5899–5910, 2023

    2023

  5. [13]

    Performance enhancement for B5G/6G networks based on space time coding schemes assisted by intelligent reflecting surfaces with higher modulation orders,

    M. El-Hussien, B. Abdelhamid, H. Elbadawy, H. El-Hennawy, and M. Ahmed, “Performance enhancement for B5G/6G networks based on space time coding schemes assisted by intelligent reflecting surfaces with higher modulation orders,” Sensors, vol. 24, no. 19, p. 6169, 2024

    2024

  6. [14]

    Performance analysis of RIS-assisted Alamouti STBC scheme,

    S. Kumari, S. Srirangarajan, and V . Bhatia, “Performance analysis of RIS-assisted Alamouti STBC scheme,” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 3454–3458, 2024

    2024

  7. [15]

    Performance analysis for recon- figurable intelligent surface assisted MIMO systems,

    L. Sui, Z. Lin, P. Xiao, and B. Vucetic, “Performance analysis for recon- figurable intelligent surface assisted MIMO systems,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 394–407, 2024

    2024

  8. [16]

    Ergodic capacity analysis of reconfigurable intelligent surface assisted MIMO systems over Rayleigh-Rician channels,

    M. Abbasi Mosleh, F. Heliot, and R. Tafazolli, “Ergodic capacity analysis of reconfigurable intelligent surface assisted MIMO systems over Rayleigh-Rician channels,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 75–79, 2023

    2023

  9. [17]

    Ergodic capacity analysis of reconfigurable intelligent surface assisted MIMO systems with a practical phase shift and amplitude response,

    M. A. Mosleh, F. H ´eliot, and R. Tafazolli, “Ergodic capacity analysis of reconfigurable intelligent surface assisted MIMO systems with a practical phase shift and amplitude response,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 73, no. 8, pp. 11 441–11 457, 2024

    2024

  10. [18]

    MSE minimization in RIS-aided MU-MIMO with discrete phase shifts and fronthaul quanti- zation,

    P. Ramezani, Y . Khorsandmanesh, and E. Bj¨ornson, “MSE minimization in RIS-aided MU-MIMO with discrete phase shifts and fronthaul quanti- zation,” in 2024 IEEE 99th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2024- Spring), 2024, pp. 1–5. POSSIBLE IEEE JOURNAL, VOL. XX, NO. X, AUGUST 2025 16

    2024

  11. [19]

    Ergodic achievable rate analysis and optimization of RIS-assisted millimeter-wave MIMO com- munication systems,

    R. Li, S. Sun, Y . Chen, C. Han, and M. Tao, “Ergodic achievable rate analysis and optimization of RIS-assisted millimeter-wave MIMO com- munication systems,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications , vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 972–985, 2023

    2023

  12. [20]

    Active and passive beamforming designs for SER minimization in RIS-assisted MIMO systems,

    T. Van Chien, B. Trong Duc, H. Viet Duc Luong, H. Thi Thanh Binh, H. Quoc Ngo, and S. Chatzinotas, “Active and passive beamforming designs for SER minimization in RIS-assisted MIMO systems,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 18 838– 18 854, 2024

    2024

  13. [21]

    Spatially correlated RIS-aided secure massive MIMO under CSI and hardware imperfections,

    D. Yang, J. Xu, W. Xu, B. Sheng, X. You, C. Yuen, and M. D. Renzo, “Spatially correlated RIS-aided secure massive MIMO under CSI and hardware imperfections,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communica- tions, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 11 461–11 475, 2024

    2024

  14. [22]

    T. H. Cormen, C. E. Leiserson, R. L. Rivest, and C. Stein, Introduction to Algorithms, 3rd ed. MIT Press, 2009

    2009

  15. [23]

    I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, 7th ed. Academic Press, 2007

    2007

  16. [24]

    Abramowitz and I

    M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Dover, 1974

    1974

  17. [25]

    Closed-form BER analysis for antenna selection using orthogonal space-time block codes,

    S. Kaviani and C. Tellambura, “Closed-form BER analysis for antenna selection using orthogonal space-time block codes,” IEEE Communica- tions Letters, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 704–706, 2006

    2006

  18. [26]

    Intelligent reflecting surface: Practical phase shift model and beamforming optimization,

    S. Abeywickrama, R. Zhang, Q. Wu, and C. Yuen, “Intelligent reflecting surface: Practical phase shift model and beamforming optimization,” IEEE Transactions on Communications , vol. 68, no. 9, pp. 5849–5863, 2020

    2020

  19. [27]

    P. M. Shankar, Fading and Shadowing in Wireless Systems , 2nd ed. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated, 2017

    2017

  20. [28]

    Ergodic capacity analysis of amplify-and-forward MIMO dual-hop systems,

    S. Jin, M. R. McKay, C. Zhong, and K. K. Wong, “Ergodic capacity analysis of amplify-and-forward MIMO dual-hop systems,” IEEE Trans- actions on Information Theory , vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 2204–2224, 2010

    2010

  21. [29]

    M. K. Simon and M.-S. Alouini, Digital Communication over Fading Channels, 2nd ed. Wiley, 2005

    2005

  22. [30]

    A simple and general parameterization quantifying performance in fading channels,

    Z. Wang and G. B. Giannakis, “A simple and general parameterization quantifying performance in fading channels,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 1389–1398, 2003

    2003

  23. [31]

    On the density for sums of independent exponential, Erlang and gamma variates,

    E. Levy, “On the density for sums of independent exponential, Erlang and gamma variates,” Statistical Papers, vol. 63, pp. 693–721, 2022

    2022

  24. [32]

    Negative moments of positive random variables,

    M. T. Chao and W. E. Strawderman, “Negative moments of positive random variables,” Journal of the American Statistical Association , vol. 67, no. 338, pp. 429–431, 1972

    1972

  25. [33]

    The moment- generating function and negative integer moments,

    N. Cressie, A. S. Davis, J. L. Folks, and J. L. Folks, “The moment- generating function and negative integer moments,” The American Statistician, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 148–150, 1981

    1981

  26. [34]

    Active RISs: Modeling and Optimization,

    R. A. Tasci, P. Gavriilidis, E. Basar, and G. C. Alexandropoulos, “Active RISs: Modeling and Optimization,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.16499

    2025 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Optimal Config- uration of Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces With Non-uniform Phase Quantization,

    J. Lu, R. Xiong, T. Mi, K. Yin, and R. CaimingQiu, “Optimal Config- uration of Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces With Non-uniform Phase Quantization,” in GLOBECOM 2024 - 2024 IEEE Global Communica- tions Conference, 2024, pp. 3751–3756

    2024

  28. [36]

    Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RIS): communication models, channel models, channel estimation and evaluation methodol- ogy,

    ETSI GR, “Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RIS): communication models, channel models, channel estimation and evaluation methodol- ogy,” ETSI GR RIS 003 V1.1.1, June 2023

    2023

  29. [37]

    Billingsley, Probability and Measure, ser

    P. Billingsley, Probability and Measure, ser. Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics. Wiley India, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=QyXqOXyxEeIC

    2017

  30. [38]

    Saddlepoint approximations in statistics,

    H. E. Daniels, “Saddlepoint approximations in statistics,” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, pp. 631–650, 1954

    1954

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.