REVIEW 2 cited by
Sound Statistical Model Checking for Probabilities and Expected Rewards (extended version)
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Statistical model checking estimates probabilities and expectations of interest in probabilistic system models by using random simulations. Its results come with statistical guarantees. However, many tools use unsound statistical methods that produce incorrect results more often than they claim. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive overview of tools and their correctness, as well as of sound methods available for estimating probabilities from the literature. For expected rewards, we investigate how to bound the path reward distribution to apply sound statistical methods for bounded distributions, of which we recommend the Dvoretzky-Kiefer-Wolfowitz inequality that has not been used in SMC so far. We prove that even reachability rewards can be bounded in theory, and formalise the concept of limit-PAC procedures for a practical solution. The 'modes' SMC tool implements our methods and recommendations, which we use to experimentally confirm our results.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Time-Sensitive Importance Splitting
By incorporating timer bounds into a backwards reachability-based importance function, the paper gives a rare event simulation method that estimates a PAND-gate failure probability where the time-agnostic baseline fin...
-
Modeling Uncertainty: From Simulink to Stochastic Hybrid Automata
The paper contributes transformation rules that map new stochastic Simulink subsystems (timer, switch, sampling, noise, aging) into stochastic hybrid automata, enabling statistical model checking of uncertain embedded...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.