Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 69 references

Regularizing effects of absorption terms in local-nonlocal mild singular problems

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves existence, uniqueness, and Talenti-type comparison estimates for singular elliptic problems driven by the mixed local-nonlocal operator $L=-\Delta+(-\Delta)^s$.

desk verdict Solid extension of Oliva's theory to mixed local-nonlocal operators, with a new Talenti comparison; one real technical restriction (f>0 a.e. for s>1/2) that should be stated more honestly. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.11656 v1 pith:DN55U7DF submitted 2025-06-13 math.AP

Stefano Biagi , Enzo Maria Merlino , Eugenio Vecchi This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35J7535M1235J6135B51
keywords local-nonlocaloperatorssingularellipticproblemsabsorptiontermsenergysolutionsTalenticomparisonrearrangementsfractionalLaplacianregularizingeffects
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies the mixed local-nonlocal operator $L=-\Delta+(-\Delta)^s$, the sum of the usual Laplacian and a fractional Laplacian, and proves that singular problems with absorption, $Lu+g(u)=h(u)f$ in a bounded domain with $u>0$ and $u=0$ outside it, admit finite-energy solutions under broad structural assumptions on the singular term $h$, the absorption term $g$, and the datum $f$. For the model case $h(s)=s^{-\gamma}$ and $g(s)=s^q$, it also proves a Talenti-type pointwise comparison between the decreasing rearrangement of the solution and the solution of a symmetrized Laplacian problem, which yields explicit $L^p$, $L^\infty$, and Orlicz estimates. The reason to care is that absorption and singularity together produce a gain of summability beyond either effect alone, and the paper establishes this combined regularizing effect for local-nonlocal operators.

What carries the argument

The central object is the energy space $X^{1,2}(\Omega)$, the completion of $C_c^\infty(\Omega)$ under the global norm that combines the $H^1$ gradient with the fractional seminorm of the nonlocal term; the mixed operator $L$ is monotone, coercive, and pseudomonotone on it, and a monotone-operator existence theorem (Theorem 2.6) supplies solutions of the approximating problems. The existence proof then runs through uniform $L^\infty$ and energy estimates obtained by standard truncation and by testing with the absorption term, with the delicate nonlocal limit step handled by a fractional interpolation inequality that works precisely because of the presence of the local Laplacian. The comparison argument is carried by rearrangement machinery: coarea formula, isoperimetric inequality, Hardy-Littlewood inequality, and Bliss inequality transfer the pointwise bound to the symmetrized Laplacian problem.

What would settle it

Solve the model problem numerically in a non-radial bounded domain with $s=3/4$, $\gamma=1/2$, $q=1$, and $f\equiv 1$, compute the decreasing rearrangement $u^*$, and compare it with $((\gamma+1)v^*)^{1/(\gamma+1)}$, where $v^*$ is given by the explicit formula (4.17) for the symmetrized Laplacian. If any $\tau$ satisfies $u^*(\tau) > ((\gamma+1)v^*(\tau))^{1/(\gamma+1)}$, the comparison principle in Theorem 1.5 is false.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Under the standing assumptions (H)_h, (H)_f, (H)_g, which allow h to be singular at zero like $s^{-\gamma}$ with $\gamma\le 1$ and to grow at most polynomially at infinity, allow f to be merely $L^1$ when $\theta\ge 1$ or $L^m$ when $\theta<1$, require $f>0$ almost everywhere when $s>1/2$, and require $g(0)=0$ with a power lower bound when $\theta<1$, Theorem 1.2 constructs a distributional solution u with $u|_\Omega\in H_0^1(\Omega)$ and $g(u)u\in L^1(\Omega)$. Theorem 1.3 gives uniqueness whenever h is non-increasing and g is non-decreasing. For the model problem with $h(s)=s^{-\gamma}$ and $g(s)=s^q$, Theorem 1.5 establishes the rearrangement comparison $u^*(\tau) \le ((\gamma+1)v^*(\tau))^{1/(\gamma+1)}$ for almost every $\tau\in(0,|\Omega|)$, where v solves the symmetrized Laplacian problem $-\Delta v=f^\sharp$ in the ball $\Omega^\sharp$, and from it derives explicit $L^p$ bounds with $p=nm(\gamma+1)/(n-2m)$ when $1<m<n/2$, an $L^\infty$ bound when $m>n/2$, and membership in an exponential Orlicz space when $m=n/2$.

Load-bearing premise

When the fractional exponent s is greater than 1/2, the proof relies on f being nonzero almost everywhere in Ω; allowing f to vanish on a set of positive measure breaks the step that forces the solution to be positive everywhere, and removing this restriction is shown only under extra smoothness and subcritical-growth hypotheses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For the model problem there is a unique energy solution $u\in H_0^1(\Omega)\cap L^{q+1}(\Omega)$ whenever $q\ge\max\{0,(1-m\gamma)/(m-1)\}$.
  • The rearrangement comparison gives the same explicit $L^p$, $L^\infty$, and Orlicz integrability that the pure Laplacian singular problem would have, so the fractional part does not worsen the final summability bounds.
  • When m is below the threshold $m_\gamma=2n/(n(\gamma+1)-2(1-\gamma))$, the absorption term produces a stronger regularizing effect than the Talenti estimate alone, as noted in Remark 1.6.
  • The existence and uniqueness results extend the classical singular-problem and absorption-type theorems for the pure Laplacian to the local-nonlocal operator $L$, with uniqueness under natural monotonicity assumptions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the comparison proof in Section 4 simply discards the nonlocal term, the rearrangement bound is likely to survive for more general local-nonlocal operators, such as quasilinear variants or other fractional orders, provided the nonlocal term stays nonnegative under the chosen test functions; this is a natural but unproved extension.
  • The positivity assumption on f for $s>1/2$ looks like an artifact of the proof's handling of the nonlocal term, and the appendix's removal under subcritical growth and local smoothness suggests a strong maximum principle for L would remove it entirely, but no such principle is currently available for this operator.
  • Because the constants in Theorem 1.5 are independent of s, the local-nonlocal singular problem may inherit the Laplacian's regularizing effects exactly, which would give practical a priori bounds that do not require knowing the fractional order.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the mixed local-nonlocal singular elliptic problem L u + g(u) = h(u) f in Ω, u > 0 in Ω, u = 0 outside Ω, where L = -Δ + (-Δ)^s and s ∈ (0,1). Under structural assumptions on h, g, and f, it proves existence of an energy solution in X^{1,2}(Ω) with g(u)u ∈ L^1(Ω), uniqueness under monotonicity of h and g, and, for the model problem, a Talenti-type pointwise comparison that yields explicit L^p, L∞, and Orlicz-type estimates. The proof passes through a Leray-Lions theorem for the mixed operator, a two-step approximation scheme, and a new interpolation argument that controls the nonlocal term in the limiting procedure.

Significance. If the results hold, they extend the known regularizing effect of absorption terms in singular problems from the purely local setting of Oliva to local-nonlocal operators, and they provide explicit quantitative bounds via symmetrization. The paper's technical core—the limiting argument for the nonlocal term, especially the interpolation inequality used to prove (3.32)—is original and makes essential use of the local part of the operator. The proofs are detailed and, apart from the caveat below, self-contained. The main limitation is that the existence theorem for 1/2 < s < 1 requires the datum f to be positive almost everywhere, a condition the authors label 'purely technical' but remove only partially in an appendix; this restriction is load-bearing for the proof of the central limit.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3, proof of Theorem 1.2, Case II (1/2 < s < 1), Eqs. (3.29)-(3.41)] The crucial limit (3.32) is proved only through the chain (3.29)-(3.41), where (1.5) forces |{u = 0}| = 0 and hence makes the integral in (3.41) vanish. If f vanishes on a set of positive measure, the limsup in (3.40) need not be zero, and the squeeze argument for B_{n,δ} collapses. The text in the Introduction is honest about needing (1.5), but Appendix A's assertion that (1.5) is 'purely technical and plays no essential role' is not supported: the appendix removes it only for the model problem and only under the extra hypotheses (A.2)-(A.3), namely q ≤ 2^* - 1 and f ∈ C^δ_loc. This is a real restriction on the generality of Theorem 1.2, not a harmless normalization; I recommend stating the theorem with (1.5) explicitly marked as essential for s > 1/2 and reformulating the general removal as an open problem.
  2. [Abstract and Introduction] The abstract claims existence and uniqueness of energy solutions for 'singular problems with absorption driven by local-nonlocal operators' without mentioning the positivity condition (1.5). Since for 1/2 < s < 1 the general existence theorem is proved only under this additional datum assumption, the summary of results overstates the scope. Please qualify the abstract and the introductory description of Theorem 1.2 to reflect the dependence on (1.5).
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] There is a typo in the abstract: 'solutionns' should be 'solutions'.
  2. [Section 3.1, around Eq. (3.38)] The double limit notation 'lim_{\delta\to0} lim_{n\to\infty}' is used several times; consider clarifying the order of the limits and, in (3.40), specifying that the limiting integral after 'limsup' is taken in the sense that the upper bound is meant for the iterated limit.
  3. [Appendix A, after Eq. (A.8)] The references to 'Lemma 3.2-(1)' and 'Lemma 3.2-(2)' are ambiguous because Lemma 3.2 is not stated with numbered subclaims; the intended referents are the estimates (3.12) and (3.13), and the text should say so explicitly.
  4. [Theorem 1.5 and its proof] In the statement of estimate (1.8), the factor 'n2ω2/n_n' is hard to read; the proof of (1.8) should be checked against the displayed constant to ensure the notation for ω_n is consistent.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: existence, uniqueness, and the Talenti comparison are proved by explicit approximation and rearrangement arguments; the only self-citation ([9] for L∞-boundedness of approximants) is supported by an independent Stampacchia estimate and is not load-bearing.

full rationale

I walked the paper's derivation chain. Theorem 1.2 is proved by approximating problems (3.2), a Leray--Lions-type existence theorem (Theorem 2.6), uniform estimates (Lemmas 3.1 and 3.2), and a passage to the limit. The delicate nonlocal limit (3.32) is handled by the explicit estimates (3.35)--(3.41), using interpolation and the assumption (1.5) only to conclude |{u=0}|=0; Appendix A candidly flags (1.5) as technical and gives a partial removal route under extra hypotheses. This is a stated limitation, not a circular step. Theorem 1.3 is a direct monotonicity test-function argument. Theorem 1.5 follows from Theorem 4.1, whose proof derives the comparison u*(τ) ≤ ((γ+1)v*(τ))^{1/(γ+1)} from rearrangement and isoperimetric inequalities (4.11)--(4.18), with the nonlocal term dropped by monotonicity; the resulting Lp, L∞, and Orlicz bounds use standard Bliss and Hardy inequalities. The only self-citation I found is the use of [9] in Lemma 3.1 for L∞-boundedness of the approximating solutions, but the same lemma independently runs the Stampacchia argument (3.8), so the citation is not load-bearing for the central claims. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no result reduces to its input by construction, and the central existence, uniqueness, and comparison theorems carry independent proof content.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities or free parameters. It relies on standard analytic tools and on the stated structural assumptions. The only ad hoc assumption is (1.5), which is explicitly flagged as technical and partially removed in Appendix A.

assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Ω is a bounded open set with smooth boundary.
    Used throughout to ensure Sobolev embeddings, compactness, and regularity of solutions.
  • domain assumption Structural conditions (H)_h, (H)_f, (H)_g hold, including the absorption lower bound (g1) when θ < 1.
    These assumptions define the class of problems studied; the absorption lower bound is needed to absorb the singular term in Lemma 3.2.
  • ad hoc to paper Positivity of the datum: |{f = 0}| = 0 for 1/2 < s < 1, equation (1.5).
    Introduced specifically for the proof of the limit (3.32); the authors acknowledge it is technical and show in Appendix A how to remove it under additional conditions.
  • standard math Leray-Lions surjectivity theorem and pseudomonotone operator theory (Showalter [61]).
    Used in Theorem 2.6 to obtain solutions to the approximating problems.
  • standard math Fractional Sobolev embedding and interpolation inequalities (Leoni [52]).
    Used for compactness and in the key estimates (3.35)-(3.37).
  • standard math Isoperimetric inequality, coarea formula, and rearrangement properties (Talenti [66,67]).
    Core tools for the comparison principle in Section 4.
  • standard math Bliss inequality.
    Used to convert the Talenti comparison into explicit L^p bounds in Theorem 1.5.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Regularizing effects of absorption terms in local-nonlocal mild singular problems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DN55U7DF

@misc{pith2026250611656,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Regularizing effects of absorption terms in local-nonlocal mild singular problems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DN55U7DF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.11656}
}
read the original abstract

In this paper we prove existence and uniqueness of energy solutionns for singular problems with absorption driven by local-nonlocal operators. Moreover, we establish a comparison principle \`a la Talenti, leading to a gain of summability result for the solutions of these problems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages

  1. [57]

    Oliva,Regularizing effect of absorption terms in singular problems, J

    F. Oliva,Regularizing effect of absorption terms in singular problems, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 472, (2019), no. 1, 1136–1166. 3, 4, 5, 6, 14, 20, 23, 24, 27

    work page 2019

  2. [1]

    Abatangelo, M

    N. Abatangelo, M. Cozzi,An elliptic boundary value problem with fractional nonlinearity, SIAM J. Math. Anal.53(3), (2021), 3577–3601. 1

    work page 2021

  3. [2]

    Symmetry, existence and regularity results for a class of mixed local-nonlocal semilinear singular elliptic problem via variational characterization

    G.C. Anthal, P. Garain,Variational characterization of a singular mixed local and nonlo- cal semilinear elliptic equation and its application to decomposition, symmetry and jumping problem, preprint.https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.099246

    work page Pith review arXiv

  4. [3]

    Antonini, M

    C.A. Antonini, M. Cozzi,Global gradient regularity and a Hopf lemma for quasilinear opera- tors of mixed local-nonlocal type, J. Differential Equations425, (2025), 342–382. 1

    work page 2025

  5. [4]

    A large class of nonlocal elliptic equations with singular nonlinearities

    R. Arora, P.-T. Nguyen, V.D. Radulescu,A large class of nonlocal elliptic equations with singular nonlinearities, preprint.https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.066346

    work page Pith review arXiv

  6. [5]

    Arora, V.D

    R. Arora, V.D. Radulescu,Combined effects in mixed local-nonlocal stationary problems, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A, (2023), pp. 1–47.https://doi.org/10.1017/prm.2023.802, 6

    work page doi:10.1017/prm.2023.802 2023

  7. [6]

    Bahrouni,Symmetrization for Mixed Operators, Ann

    S. Bahrouni,Symmetrization for Mixed Operators, Ann. Math. Sil.39(1), (2025), 64–75. 6

    work page 2025

  8. [7]

    Barrios, I

    B. Barrios, I. de Bonis, M. Medina, I. Peral,Semilinear problems for the fractional laplacian with a singular nonlinearity, Open Math.13, (2015), 390–407. 2, 6

    work page 2015

Show all 69 references
  1. [8]

    Bhowmick, S

    S. Bhowmick, S. Ghosh,Existence results for mixed local and nonlocal elliptic equations in- volving singularity and nonregular data, preprint.https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.044416

    arXiv

  2. [9]

    Biagi, S

    S. Biagi, S. Dipierro, E. Valdinoci, E. Vecchi,Mixed local and nonlocal elliptic operators: regularity and maximum principles, Comm. Partial Differential Equations47(3) (2022), 585–

    2022

  3. [10]

    Biagi, S

    S. Biagi, S. Dipierro, E. Valdinoci, E. Vecchi,A Brezis-Nirenberg type result for mixed local and nonlocal operators, NoDEA Nonlinear Differential Equations Appl.32, (2025), art. 62. 1 38 S. BIAGI, E.M. MERLINO, AND E. VECCHI

    2025

  4. [11]

    Biagi, F

    S. Biagi, F. Esposito, L. Montoro, E. Vecchi,On mixed local-nonlocal problems with Hardy potential, published online (2025), Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A.https://doi.org/10. 1017/prm.2025.282

    2025

  5. [12]

    Biagi, E

    S. Biagi, E. Vecchi,Multiplicity of positive solutions for mixed local-nonlocal singular critical problems, Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ.63, (2024), Article 221. 1, 6

    2024

  6. [13]

    Biagi, E

    S. Biagi, E. Vecchi,On the existence of a second positive solution to mixed local-nonlocal concave-convex critical problems, Nonlinear Anal.256, (2025), 113795. 1

    2025

  7. [14]

    Biroud,Mixed local and nonlocal equation with singular nonlinearity having variable expo- nent, J

    K. Biroud,Mixed local and nonlocal equation with singular nonlinearity having variable expo- nent, J. Pseudo-Differ. Oper. Appl.14(1), (2023), Paper No. 13, 24 pp. 6

    2023

  8. [15]

    Biswas, P

    S. Biswas, P. GarainRegularity and existence for semilinear mixed local-nonlocal equations with variable singularities and measure data, Commun. Contemp. Math. 2550028 (2025), 39pp. 6

    2025

  9. [16]

    Biswas, M

    A. Biswas, M. Modasiya, A. Sen,Boundary regularity of mixed local-nonlocal operators and its application, Ann. Mat. Pura Appl.202, (2023), 679–710. 1

    2023

  10. [17]

    Bliss,An Integral Inequality, J

    G.A. Bliss,An Integral Inequality, J. London Math. Soc.5(1), (1930), 40–46. 32

    1930

  11. [18]

    Boccardo, T

    L. Boccardo, T. Gallou¨ et,Nonlinear elliptic equations with right-hand side measurea, Comm. Partial Differential Equations17, (1992), 641–655. 2

    1992

  12. [19]

    Boccardo, T

    L. Boccardo, T. Gallou¨ et, J.L. V´ azquez,Nonlinear elliptic equations inR N without growth restrictions on the data, J. Differential Equations105, (1993), 334–363. 2

    1993

  13. [20]

    Boccardo, L

    L. Boccardo, L. Orsina,Semilinear elliptic equations with singular nonlinearities, Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ.37, (2010), 363–380. 2, 6

    2010

  14. [21]

    Boccardo, L

    L. Boccardo, L. Orsina, I. Peral,A remark on existence and optimal summability of solutions of elliptic problems involving Hardy potential, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst.16(3), (2006), 513–

    2006

  15. [22]

    Bonforte, A

    M. Bonforte, A. Figalli, J.L. V´ azquez,Sharp boundary behaviour of solutions to semilinear nonlocal elliptic equations, Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ.57, (2018), Article 57. 1

    2018

  16. [23]

    J.-M. Bony, P. Courr` ege, P. Priouret,Semi-groupes de Feller sur une vari´ et´ e ` a bord compacte et probl` emes aux limites int´ egro-diff´ erentiels du second ordre donnant lieu au principe du maximum, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble)18(2), (1968), 369–521. 1

    1968

  17. [24]

    Brandolini, F

    B. Brandolini, F. Chiacchio, C. Trombetti,Symmetrization for singular semilinear elliptic equations, Ann. Mat. Pura Appl.193, (2014), 389–404. 5, 33

    2014

  18. [25]

    Brezis, T

    H. Brezis, T. Kato,Remarks on the Schr¨ odinger operator with singular complex potentials, J. Math. Pures Appl.58, (1979), 137–151. 5

    1979

  19. [26]

    S.-S. Byun, K. Song,Mixed local and nonlocal equations with measure data, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations62, (2023), Article 14. 1

    2023

  20. [27]

    Calderon, A

    A.P. Calderon, A. Zygmund,On the existence of certain singular integrals, Acta Math.88, (1952), 85–139. 2

    1952

  21. [28]

    Cancelier,Probl` emes aux limites pseudo-diff´ erentiels donnant lieu au principe du maxi- mum, Comm

    C. Cancelier,Probl` emes aux limites pseudo-diff´ erentiels donnant lieu au principe du maxi- mum, Comm. Partial Differential Equations11(15), (1986), 1677–1726. 1

    1986

  22. [29]

    Canino, M

    A. Canino, M. Degiovanni,A variational approach to a class of singular semilinear elliptic equations, J. Convex Anal.11, (2004), 147–162. 6

    2004

  23. [30]

    Canino, M

    A. Canino, M. Grandinetti, B. Sciunzi,Symmetry of solutions of some semilinear elliptic equations with singular nonlinearities, J. Differential Equations255(12), (2013), 4437–4447. 6

    2013

  24. [31]

    Canino, L

    A. Canino, L. Montoro, B. Sciunzi, M. Squassina,Nonlocal problems with singular nonlinear- ity, Bull. Sci. Math.141(3), (2017), 223–250. 6

    2017

  25. [32]

    Canino, L

    A. Canino, L. Montoro, B. Sciunzi, A. Trombetta,Variational properties of nonlocal singular problems, Nonlinearity36(8), (2023), 4034–4052. 6

    2023

  26. [33]

    Z.-Q. Chen, P. Kim, R. Song, Z. Vondraˇ cek,Boundary Harnack principle for∆+∆α/2, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.364(8), (2012), 4169–4205. 1

    2012

  27. [34]

    Cirmi,Regularity of the solutions to nonlinear elliptic equations with a lower-order term, Nonlinear Anal.25, (1995), 363–380

    G.R. Cirmi,Regularity of the solutions to nonlinear elliptic equations with a lower-order term, Nonlinear Anal.25, (1995), 363–380. 2

    1995

  28. [35]

    Crandall, P.H

    M.G. Crandall, P.H. Rabinowitz, L. Tartar,On a Dirichlet problem with a singular nonlin- earity, Comm. Partial Differential Equations2, (1977), 193–222. 6

    1977

  29. [36]

    De Cave, F

    L.M. De Cave, F. Oliva,On the regularizing effect of some absorption and singular lower order terms in classical Dirichlet problems withL 1 data, J. Elliptic Parabol. Equ.2, (2016), no. 1-2, 73–85. 3, 5 LOCAL-NONLOCAL SINGULAR PROBLEMS WITH ABSORPTION 39

    2016

  30. [37]

    De Filippis, G

    C. De Filippis, G. Mingione,Gradient regularity in mixed local and nonlocal problems, Math. Ann.388, (2024), 261–328. 1

    2024

  31. [38]

    Di Nezza, G

    E. Di Nezza, G. Palatucci, E. Valdinoci,Hitchhiker’s guide to the fractional Sobolev spaces, Bull. Sci. Math.136, (2012), 521–573. 26

    2012

  32. [39]

    M. Ding, Y. Fang, C. Zhang, C.Local behavior of the mixed local and nonlocal problems with nonstandard growth, J. London Math. Soc.109(6), (2024), Article e12947. 1

    2024

  33. [40]

    Dipierro, E

    S. Dipierro, E. Proietti Lippi, E. Valdinoci,(Non)local logistic equations with Neumann con- ditions, Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Anal. Non Lin´ eaire (2022), DOI: 10.4171/AIHPC/57 . 1

    2022 doi

  34. [41]

    Dipierro, E

    S. Dipierro, E. Valdinoci,Description of an ecological niche for a mixed local/nonlocal dis- persal: an evolution equation and a new Neumann condition arising from the superposition of Brownian and L´ evy processes, Phys. A.575, (2021), 126052. 1

    2021

  35. [42]

    Ferone, B

    V. Ferone, B. Volzone,Symmetrization for fractional elliptic problems: a direct approach, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.239, (2021), 1733–1770. 6

    2021

  36. [43]

    Fulks, J.S

    W. Fulks, J.S. Maybee,A singular non-linear equation, Osaka Math. J.12,(1960), 1–19. 6

    1960

  37. [44]

    Garain,On a class of mixed local and nonlocal semilinear elliptic equation with singular nonlinearity, J

    P. Garain,On a class of mixed local and nonlocal semilinear elliptic equation with singular nonlinearity, J. Geom. Anal.33, (2023), Article 212. 6

    2023

  38. [45]

    Garain, W

    P. Garain, W. Kim, J. Kinnunen,On the regularity theory for mixed anisotropic and nonlocal p-Laplace equations and its applications to singular problems, Forum Math.36, (2024), 697–

    2024

  39. [46]

    Garain, J

    P. Garain, J. Kinnunen,On the regularity theory for mixed local and nonlocal quasilinear elliptic equations, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.375(8), (2022), 5393–5423. 1

    2022

  40. [47]

    Garain, E

    P. Garain, E. Lindgren,Higher H¨ older regularity for mixed local and nonlocal degenerate elliptic equations, Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ.62, (2023), Article 67. 1, 16

    2023

  41. [48]

    Garain, A

    P. Garain, A. Ukhlov,Mixed local and nonlocal Sobolev inequalities with extremal and associ- ated quasilinear singular elliptic problems, Nonlinear Anal.223, (2022), 113022. 6

    2022

  42. [49]

    Nguyen,Compactness of Green operators with applications to semilinear nonlocal elliptic equations, J

    P.-T.- Huynh, P.-T. Nguyen,Compactness of Green operators with applications to semilinear nonlocal elliptic equations, J. Differential Equations418, (2025), 97–141. 6

    2025

  43. [50]

    Lair, A.W

    A.V. Lair, A.W. Shaker,Classical and weak solutions of a singular semilinear elliptic problem, J. Math. Anal. App.211, (1997), 371–385. 6

    1997

  44. [51]

    Lazer, P.J

    A.C. Lazer, P.J. Mckenna,On a singular nonlinear elliptic boundary value problem, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.111, (1991), 721–730. 6

    1991

  45. [52]

    Leoni,A First Course in Fractional Sobolev Spaces, Grad

    G. Leoni,A First Course in Fractional Sobolev Spaces, Grad. Stud. Math. 229, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2023, xv+586 pp. 8, 24, 25

    2023

  46. [53]

    Leonori, I

    T. Leonori, I. Peral, A. Primo, F. Soria,Basic estimates for solutions of a class of nonlocal elliptic and parabolic equations, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst.35(12), (2015), 6031–6068 2

    2015

  47. [54]

    Leray, J.-L

    J. Leray, J.-L. Lions,Quelques r´ esultats de Viˇ sik sur les probl` emes elliptiques non lin´ eaires par les m´ ethodes de Minty-Browder, Bull. Soc. Math. France93, (1965), 97–107. 4, 16

    1965

  48. [55]

    Monticelli, S

    D.D. Monticelli, S. Rodney, R.L. Wheeden,Boundedness of weak solutions of degenerate quasilinear equations with rough coefficients, Differential Integral Equations25, (2012), 143–

    2012

  49. [56]

    Korvenp¨ a¨ a, T

    J. Korvenp¨ a¨ a, T. Kuusi, E. Lindgren,Equivalence of solutions to fractional p-Laplace type equations, J. Math. Pures Appl. (9)132(2019), 1-26. 8

    2019

  50. [58]

    Oliva, F

    F. Oliva, F. Petitta,On singular elliptic equations with measure sources, ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var.22, (2016), 289–308. 6

    2016

  51. [59]

    Oliva, F

    F. Oliva, F. Petitta,Finite and infinite energy solutions of singular elliptic problems: existence and uniqueness, J. Differential Equations264, (2018), 311–340. 2, 6

    2018

  52. [60]

    Oliva, F

    F. Oliva, F. Petitta,Singular Elliptic PDEs: an extensive overview, Partial Differ. Equ. Appl. 6, (2025), Article 6. 6

    2025

  53. [61]

    Showalter,Monotone operators in Banach space and nonlinear partial differential equa- tions, Math

    R.E. Showalter,Monotone operators in Banach space and nonlinear partial differential equa- tions, Math. Surveys Monogr. 49, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1997, xiv+278 pp. 16

    1997

  54. [62]

    Stampacchia,Le probl` eme de Dirichlet pour les ´ equations elliptiques du second ordre ` a coefficients discontinus, Ann

    G. Stampacchia,Le probl` eme de Dirichlet pour les ´ equations elliptiques du second ordre ` a coefficients discontinus, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble)15, (1965), 189–258. 2, 19

    1965

  55. [63]

    Stuart,Existence and approximation of solutions of non-linear elliptic equations, Math

    C.A. Stuart,Existence and approximation of solutions of non-linear elliptic equations, Math. Z.147(1), (1976), 53–63. 6 40 S. BIAGI, E.M. MERLINO, AND E. VECCHI

    1976

  56. [64]

    X. Su, E. Valdinoci, Y. Wei, J. Zhang,Regularity results for solutions of mixed local and nonlocal elliptic equations, Math. Z.302, (2022), 1855–1878. 1

    2022

  57. [65]

    X. Su, E. Valdinoci, Y. Wei, J. Zhang,On Some Regularity Properties of Mixed Local and Nonlocal Elliptic Equations, J. Differential Equations416, (2025), 576–613. 1, 36

    2025

  58. [66]

    Talenti,Elliptic equations and rearrangements, Ann

    G. Talenti,Elliptic equations and rearrangements, Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa Cl. Sci.3, (1976), 697–718. 16

    1976

  59. [67]

    Talenti, Inequalities in rearrangement invariant function spaces, inNonlinear analysis, function spaces and applications, Vol

    G. Talenti, Inequalities in rearrangement invariant function spaces, inNonlinear analysis, function spaces and applications, Vol. 5 (Prague, 1994), 177–230, Prometheus, Prague. 16

    1994

  60. [68]

    V´ azquez,A Strong Maximum Principle for Some Quasilinear Equations, Appl

    J.L. V´ azquez,A Strong Maximum Principle for Some Quasilinear Equations, Appl. Math. Optim.12, (1984), 191–202. 5

    1984

  61. [69]

    Youssfi, G.O.M

    A. Youssfi, G.O.M. Mahmoud,Nonlocal semilinear elliptic problems with singular nonlinear- ity, Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ.60, (2021), Article 153. 2 (S. Biagi)Dipartimento di Matematica Politecnico di Milano Via Bonardi 9, 20133 Milano, Italy Email address:stefano.biagi@po...

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.