Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Reducing Population-level Inequality Can Improve Demographic Group Fairness: a Twitter Case Study

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.08135 v1 pith:DNMGMKF4 submitted 2024-09-12 cs.SI

classification cs.SI
keywords demographicinequalitymetricsdisparitiescasemeasurefairnessgroup-wise
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Many existing fairness metrics measure group-wise demographic disparities in system behavior or model performance. Calculating these metrics requires access to demographic information, which, in industrial settings, is often unavailable. By contrast, economic inequality metrics, such as the Gini coefficient, require no demographic data to measure. However, reductions in economic inequality do not necessarily correspond to reductions in demographic disparities. In this paper, we empirically explore the relationship between demographic-free inequality metrics -- such as the Gini coefficient -- and standard demographic bias metrics that measure group-wise model performance disparities specifically in the case of engagement inequality on Twitter. We analyze tweets from 174K users over the duration of 2021 and find that demographic-free impression inequality metrics are positively correlated with gender, race, and age disparities in the average case, and weakly (but still positively) correlated with demographic bias in the worst case. We therefore recommend inequality metrics as a potentially useful proxy measure of average group-wise disparities, especially in cases where such disparities cannot be measured directly. Based on these results, we believe they can be used as part of broader efforts to improve fairness between demographic groups in scenarios like content recommendation on social media.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Stairway to Fairness: Connecting Group and Individual Fairness

    cs.IR 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Group fairness scores in recommender systems can be much better than individual fairness scores, and group-level measures are not reliable proxies for individual-level fairness.

Pith tools