Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 79 references

Quantum-Geometric Raman Response in Multiorbital Flat-Band Systems

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-07-30 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Virtual interband processes give multiorbital flat bands a finite Raman vertex controlled by the quantum geometric tensor, even when dispersion vanishes.

desk verdict Solid controlled theory for flat-band Raman with a real QGT piece; the algebra holds, but the three-term split is only checked as a total sum on a tiny ED cluster. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.27200 v1 pith:DOPLGG7R submitted 2026-07-29 cond-mat.str-el

Wai Ting Tai , Martin Claassen This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords quantumgeometryflatbandsRamanscatteringmultiorbitalsystemsgeometrictensorcollectiveexcitationsmoirématerialsvirtualinterbandprocesses
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Naive single-band theory says a perfectly flat band is Raman-dark: the usual velocity and curvature vertices go to zero. This paper shows that picture is incomplete once the band is embedded in a multiorbital Hilbert space. Virtual excursions to remote bands, treated on equal footing with interband Coulomb scattering, leave a subgap Raman vertex that stays finite in the strict flat-band limit and is partly fixed by the quantum geometric tensor. The authors build a controlled large-gap expansion that splits the vertex into a geometry term, an effective resonant current built from a covariant derivative, and interaction-generated non-resonant pieces, then check it against exact diagonalization of a two-orbital flat-band model. Agreement at large photon detuning supports reading polarization-resolved Raman as a geometry-sensitive probe of collective modes in correlated flat-band materials.

What carries the argument

A large-gap downfolding of the Raman matrix that retains every process finite as Δ→∞ at fixed ω and U: the geometric residue M_geom^μν from the quantum geometric tensor, an effective resonant current expressed as a Berry-connection covariant derivative of wavefunction overlaps, and frequency-independent non-resonant corrections from interband Coulomb dressing.

What would settle it

In a controllable two-orbital flat-band model, compute polarization-resolved Raman (A1g and A2g) from the projected vertices and from the full multi-orbital Hamiltonian while dialing the gap Δ at fixed U and ω; quantitative match only at large Δ/U, and systematic mismatch when Δ becomes comparable to U or ω, would confirm or refute the claimed expansion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In multiorbital flat-band systems, virtual interband light-matter and Coulomb processes generate a finite O(Δ⁰) subgap Raman vertex that does not vanish when the active band is dispersionless. That vertex decomposes into an interaction-independent geometric piece written directly from the quantum geometric tensor, plus effective resonant and non-resonant pieces generated by virtual interband Coulomb scattering; the projected theory matches full multi-orbital Raman spectra when the photon energy is far from interband resonance.

Load-bearing premise

The theory only keeps processes that stay finite when the gap to remote bands is much larger than both the photon energy and the interaction strength; if that separation is not large, real interband processes take over and the expansion fails.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Polarization-resolved Raman can carry geometric weight from Berry curvature and quantum metric even in a perfectly flat active band.
  • In the A2g channel the effective non-resonant piece vanishes by symmetry, so the response isolates geometry plus the renormalized resonant current.
  • The same projected vertices can be evaluated on material-specific flat-band Hamiltonians (moiré TMDs, transition-metal oxyhalides) to predict which collective modes gain Raman weight.
  • The non-Abelian form extends the vertex to multi-band active manifolds, including candidate fractional Chern insulator settings.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the geometric Raman weight is measurable, comparing A1g and A2g channels in a TRS versus TRSB flat-band material could separate quantum-metric from Berry-curvature contributions without relying on transport.
  • The same large-gap pairing of interband currents with remote resolvents may reorganize other two-photon or nonlinear optical vertices in flat bands, not only Raman.
  • Failure of the expansion when Δ ~ U suggests a practical diagnostic: when Raman intensity starts tracking remote-band resonances rather than in-manifold collective modes, the material has left the quantum-geometric Raman regime.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper develops a systematic large-gap (1/Δ) effective theory of electronic Raman scattering for multiorbital flat-band systems in the far-detuned regime ω_I,F, U ≪ Δ. Because the intraband current and diamagnetic vertices vanish in the strict flat-band limit, the leading subgap Raman vertex arises entirely from virtual interband processes: each interband current insertion is O(Δ) and compensates one remote-band resolvent, so a finite O(Δ^0) vertex survives. The authors show the Raman operator decomposes into (i) an interaction-independent geometric term M_geom given by the quantum geometric tensor of the active band [Eqs. (28)–(29)], arising from an exact cancellation of the O(Δ) pieces of the bare resonant and diamagnetic vertices; (ii) an effective resonant term whose renormalized current is a covariant derivative of Bloch-wavefunction overlaps [Eqs. (24)–(26)]; and (iii) effective non-resonant terms generated by virtual interband Coulomb scattering that depend irreducibly on remote-band wavefunctions. The theory is benchmarked against full two-orbital exact diagonalization of projector-type flat-band models (TRSB and TRS) on a 2×6 cluster, showing convergence of the projected theory to the full spectra in A1g and A2g channels as Δ/U → ∞ (Fig. 6).

Significance. If correct, this work establishes quantum geometry as an intrinsic, interaction-independent contribution to the Raman vertex of multiorbital flat bands — a qualitatively new light-scattering channel with no dispersive analog — and provides a concrete, falsifiable prediction for polarization-resolved Raman in moiré Mott insulators and oxyhalide flat-band materials. Strengths that materially raise confidence: (i) the geometric vertex is derived, not fitted, via an exact O(Delta) cancellation and Berry-connection algebra reducing it to Berry curvature plus Fubini–Study metric; (ii) the effective resonant current is reduced to a covariant derivative of wavefunction overlaps in closed form; (iii) the non-Abelian generalization is given; (iv) the projected theory is benchmarked against an independent full multi-orbital ED calculation with a controlled Delta/U convergence scan, including a channel (TRS, A2g) that isolates the interaction-driven resonant term alone. The combination of a controlled expansion, parameter-free geometric term, and an independent numerical check is exactly what one wants for this kind of effective-theory claim.

major comments (3)
  1. [§IV, Fig. 6] Fig. 6 tests only the *sum* M_geom + M_R,eff + gamma_NR,eff against the full model, yet the three-term decomposition is the paper's central structural claim. The A1g channel mixes the quantum-metric piece of M_geom with gamma_NR,eff and M_R,eff, so a misattribution between these pieces (or two compensating sign errors) would pass the benchmark. The authors already have a partial disentangler — the TRS A2g channel isolates M_R,eff since F=0 and gamma_NR vanishes by symmetry — and the projected vertices are already coded. I ask for a term-resolved comparison within the projected theory (e.g., separate curves for each vertex's contribution to the A1g spectrum), and/or an omega_I scan exploiting the distinct (omega_I+omega_F) vs (omega_I-omega_F) frequency dependence of the curvature and metric pieces in Eq. (28), to demonstrate that the attribution, not just the total, is correct.
  2. [App. E / Fig. 6] The 'quantitative agreement' in Fig. 6 is established after projecting the full-model scattering vector onto the active-band manifold to remove an O(eta), Delta-independent Lorentzian leakage (App. E, Eq. E3). While the leakage analysis in Eqs. (E2)-(E3) is transparent and the fix appears legitimate, the comparison would be more convincing if the authors (i) showed the unprojected full-model spectra alongside, quantifying the leakage level relative to the signal, and (ii) demonstrated eta-convergence of the projected comparison (e.g., a second, smaller eta value). As presented, the agreement is conditional on a preprocessing step that removes a background of the same order as the broadening, at a single eta = 0.03.
  3. [§IV, Fig. 6] The numerical validation is performed at a single parameter set (U=2, omega_I=4, t=3) on one 2x6 cluster. Since the projected theory is Delta-independent by construction, the convergence claim rests entirely on the Delta/U scan at this one point. A second point — e.g., a different t (different quantum geometry at fixed projector form), or a different omega_I/Delta ratio — would materially strengthen the claim that the projected vertices, rather than some Delta-independent artifact common to both calculations, are what agrees. This is particularly relevant because both the projected and full calculations share the same underlying Bloch spinors.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Secs. I, III.B, IV] Typos/grammar: Sec. I, 'spectral access to low-energy the collective modes'; Sec. IV, 'both the intraband conventional intraband velocity vertex' (duplicated word); Sec. IV, 'a direct test of orbital admixture and non-quantum geometry' — 'non-quantum' appears to be a typo for 'quantum'; Sec. III.B, 'with its explicit form is given in Eq. (A7)'.
  2. [Secs. II–III, App. A] Notation: the subscript '0' is used both for the bare paramagnetic/diamagnetic vertices (J_0, gamma_0) and for the active band index; the caveat in Sec. III.B helps, but renaming the band index (e.g., 'a') would prevent confusion, particularly in Appendix A where both usages coexist.
  3. [Sec. II, Eq. (4)] The crossing/Hermiticity relation of the vertex, M^{mu nu}(omega_I, omega_F) = [M^{nu mu}(omega_F, omega_I)]*, is a useful consistency check of Eq. (28) and of the channel definitions M_A1g, M_A2g; it would be worth stating explicitly after Eq. (4), including the role of complex-conjugating the outgoing polarization.
  4. [Sec. IV] It would help readers to state explicitly that restricting ED to the K=Gamma sector is not an approximation but the momentum-conserving sector for q~0 Raman scattering; as written it could be misread as a finite-size limitation.
  5. [Fig. 6] Fig. 6: please state the Delta/U range of the colorbar numerically and mark where omega_I = 4 falls relative to the smallest Delta shown, since omega_I/Delta (not only U/Delta) controls the expansion; also clarify in the caption whether the dashed projected-theory curve includes all three vertex contributions in each channel.
  6. [App. B] Appendix B: the reduction of J_pert to a covariant derivative assumes the contact (momentum-independent) form of U(q) at an intermediate step; please note which steps generalize to extended interactions and which do not.
  7. [Figs. 2–3] Fig. 3 uses J^pert_mu while the text uses J_pert and J_eff; please harmonize. In Fig. 2, panels (c1,c2,d1,d2) would benefit from the corresponding equation numbers in the caption.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: geometric Raman vertex is derived from light-matter operators and completeness, and ED agreement is an independent benchmark, not a tautology.

full rationale

The paper’s load-bearing chain is a controlled large-gap expansion of the multi-orbital Raman matrix (Eqs. 20–22), followed by an algebraic reduction of the O(Δ) cancellation between bare diamagnetic and resonant pieces to the quantum geometric tensor (Appendix A, Eqs. A2–A15) and covariant-derivative effective currents (Appendix B). Those steps use only Bloch completeness, Berry-connection algebra, and power counting (each interband Γ ~ O(Δ) compensates one remote resolvent); nothing is defined in terms of the target Raman spectra. Section IV then compares the projected operators to a full two-orbital exact-diagonalization calculation at large Δ/U—an external numerical benchmark of the same Hamiltonian, not a fit of the vertex to the spectra. Prior author citations on geometric light-matter coupling supply background context and do not define or force the Raman matrix elements. No parameter is fitted and re-predicted; no uniqueness theorem is imported to forbid alternatives; no known empirical pattern is merely renamed. Evidentiary limits (sum-only validation on one cluster after App. E projection) are real but are not circularity. Score 0 is appropriate.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The result rests on standard many-body light-matter coupling, a large-gap power count, an on-site Hubbard interaction written in the band basis, and a minimal two-orbital flat-band projector used for numerics. No new particles or forces are introduced. Free parameters are only the toy-model knobs (Δ, U, t, ω_I, lattice size) used to illustrate, not fitted to experiment.

free parameters (3)
  • orbital-texture parameter t = 3.0
    Hand-chosen (t=3.0) to set the strength of quantum geometry in the unnormalized flat-band spinors; not fitted to data.
  • interaction U and photon ω_I in ED benchmark = U=2.0, ω_I=4.0
    Fixed at U=2.0, ω_I=4.0 to probe the large-Δ expansion; illustrative, not data-driven.
  • Lorentzian broadening η = 0.03
    Numerical smearing η=0.03 for discrete ED spectra; affects leakage correction but not the analytic vertex.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Electrons couple to light via paramagnetic and diamagnetic vertices from minimal substitution / Peierls, expanded to second order in A (Eqs. 1–3).
    Standard condensed-matter light-matter starting point; invoked throughout Sec. II–III.
  • domain assumption Remote bands are separated by a large gap Δ with ω_I,F, U ≪ Δ, so only O(Δ^0) virtual processes with interband currents compensating remote resolvents are retained.
    Load-bearing expansion premise of Sec. III.A; failure mode shown when Δ/U is not large (Fig. 6).
  • domain assumption Intraband interactions in the active manifold are treated exactly; interband Coulomb and light-matter are the perturbations W.
    Partition H = H_p + W in Sec. III; defines what is kept non-perturbatively.
  • domain assumption On-site orbitally isotropic Hubbard repulsion (or U(q) generalization) for the interaction vertex in band basis.
    Eqs. 15–19; standard model choice, not derived.
  • standard math Berry connection / quantum geometric tensor algebra and completeness of the Bloch basis used to reduce geometric and covariant-derivative vertices.
    Appendices A–B; standard differential geometry of Bloch bundles.
  • ad hoc to paper Toy flat-band Hamiltonians as projectors with trigonometric spinors (TRSB/TRS) and strictly local hopping; half-filling on 2×6 torus for ED.
    Sec. IV Eqs. 33–35; chosen to isolate geometry with zero dispersion while remaining ED-tractable.
invented entities (1)
  • Effective Raman vertex decomposition (M_geom + M_R,eff + γ_NR,eff) for flat-band active manifolds independent evidence
    purpose: Organize all O(Δ^0) subgap Raman processes after integrating out remote bands.
    Not a new particle or force; an effective operator decomposition derived from standard Hamiltonian pieces. Independent check is the full multi-orbital ED comparison.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum-Geometric Raman Response in Multiorbital Flat-Band Systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DOPLGG7R

@misc{pith2026260727200,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum-Geometric Raman Response in Multiorbital Flat-Band Systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DOPLGG7R}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.27200}
}
read the original abstract

Flat-band materials host rich collective phenomena, yet a complete theory of their signatures in inelastic light scattering remains lacking. While naive theories of interacting flat bands would predict that Raman scattering vertices vanish identically in the limit of vanishing dispersion, we show that this picture is incomplete upon including the multiorbital character of such systems. We show that virtual interband processes generate a finite subgap Raman vertex controlled by the quantum geometric tensor even in the strict flat-band limit. We develop a systematic perturbative theory for Raman scattering from flat bands in the limit where the photon energy is far from resonance with interband transitions. Treating interband Coulomb scattering and light-matter coupling on equal footing, we decompose the Raman scattering vertices into an interaction-independent geometric term expressible directly in terms of the quantum geometric tensor, together with effective resonant and non-resonant pieces generated by virtual interband Coulomb scattering. We then study the polarization-resolved Raman response from collective excitations of an interacting flat band with nontrivial quantum geometry, and demonstrate quantitative agreement of our framework with a full multi-orbital calculation at large photon detuning from interband transitions. These results establish quantum geometry as an intrinsic contribution to inelastic light scattering in flat-band systems, and suggest polarization-resolved Raman spectroscopy as a quantum geometry-sensitive probe of the collective excitations of correlated flat-band platforms.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.27200 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: In the numerical implementation, the effective [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 11 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    An effective resonant contribution with a renormal- ized current vertex arising from ˆM µν 4 (two inter- band currents + two interband Coulomb), that can be expressed in terms of a covariant derivative

  2. [2]

    A non-interacting finite geometric residue ˆM µν geom arising from ˆM µν 1 + ˆM µν 2 expressible in terms of the quantum geometric tensor (Appendix A)

  3. [3]

    A collection of terms frequency-independent at large ∆. Besides the regular intraband diamagnetic term, additional contributions arise from both ˆM µν 3 (two interband currents + one interband Coulomb) and an interaction-driven correction from ˆM µν 1 + ˆM µν 2 . These terms are frequency-independent and therefore form an effective non-resonant contribu- ...

  4. [4]

    (3) is expressed in terms of a second derivative of the orbital Hamiltonian

    Non-resonant term from diamagnetic vertex The non-resonant term ˆM µν N R= ˆγµν 0 in Eq. (3) is expressed in terms of a second derivative of the orbital Hamiltonian. Expanding in the band basis via the product rule gives ∂2ho1o2k ∂kµ∂kν = ∂2u† o1n(k) ∂kµ∂kν ϵnkuno2 (k) +u † o1n(k) ∂2ϵnk ∂kµ∂kν uno2 (k) +u † o1n(k)ϵnk ∂2uno2 (k) ∂kµ∂kν + h ∂u† o1n(k) ∂kµ ∂...

  5. [5]

    Resonant term and cancellation with non-resonant term With the bare intraband current ˆJ µ 0,intraband = 0 vanishing in the flat-band limit, the bare resonant vertex must involve intermediate excitation processes to the excited states and reduces to ˆM µν 2 = ˆΓµ 0←n 1 E0 +ω I − ˆHp ˆΓν n←0 + ˆΓν 0←n 1 E0 −ω F − ˆHp ˆΓµ n←0.(A4) 11 In the large band gap l...

  6. [6]

    Geometric vertex This section simplifies ˆM µν geom in terms of quantum geometric metrics directly from the Berry connection algebra. Expanding out ˆΓµ 0←n =i P k ∆n0(k)A µ,0n k ˆc† 0kˆcnk, ˆM µν geom = X k  −Aµ,0n(k)Aν,n0(k)ωI +A ν,0n(k)Aµ,n0(k)ωF| {z } M µν geom(k)   ˆn0k.(A10) Expanding out the Berry connection products, M µν geom(k) =− Aµ,0n(k)A...

  7. [7]

    By generalizing the completeness relationship in Eq

    Multiband generalization via the non-Abelian QGT The multiband generalization follows the same algebra as above with band indicesg 1,g 2 replacing 0: M µν geom,g1g2 (k) =−[A µ,g1n(k)Aν,ng2 (k)ωI − Aν,g1n(k)Aµ,ng2 (k)ωF ].(A16) This can be simplified using the non-Abelian quantum geometric tensor, defined asQµν g1g2 = ∂kµ ug1k (1−P) ∂kν ug2k wherePis the b...

  8. [8]

    Below, we represent this in the Bloch wavefunction basis and show it reduces to a Coulomb scattering process on the ground state manifold with remote-band dependent coefficients

    Third-order term (non-resonant) The third order term consists of scattering processes mediated with an intermediate interband coupling. Below, we represent this in the Bloch wavefunction basis and show it reduces to a Coulomb scattering process on the ground state manifold with remote-band dependent coefficients. Its explicit form is given by ˆγµν NR, eff...

Show all 79 references
  1. [9]

    Correction of bare nonresonant term to the effective nonresonant term Another non-resonant contribution originating from Section III involves cross terms between the diamagnetic vertex ˆγ0 µν and the interband Coulomb interaction ˆVint. To distinguish the active-to-remote ener...

  2. [10]

    T. P. Devereaux and R. Hackl, Inelastic light scattering from correlated electrons, Reviews of Modern Physics79, 175 (2007)

    2007

  3. [11]

    P. A. Fleury and R. Loudon, Scattering of Light by One- and Two-Magnon Excitations, Physical Review166, 514 (1968)

    1968

  4. [12]

    B. S. Shastry and B. I. Shraiman, Theory of Raman scattering in Mott-Hubbard systems, Physical Review Letters65, 1068 (1990)

    1990

  5. [13]

    D. V. Khveshchenko and P. B. Wiegmann, Raman scattering and anomalous current algebra in Mott insulators, Physical Review Letters73, 500 (1994)

    1994

  6. [14]

    Ko, Z.-X

    W.-H. Ko, Z.-X. Liu, T.-K. Ng, and P. A. Lee, Raman signature of the U(1) Dirac spin-liquid state in the spin-1/2 kagome system, Physical Review B81, 024414 (2010)

    2010

  7. [15]

    M. V. Klein and S. B. Dierker, Theory of Raman scattering in superconductors, Physical Review B29, 4976 (1984)

    1984

  8. [16]

    T. P. Devereaux, D. Einzel, B. Stadlober, R. Hackl, D. H. Leach, and J. J. Neumeier, Electronic Raman scattering in high-Tc superconductors: A probe ofd x2−y2 pairing, Physical Review Letters72, 396 (1994)

    1994

  9. [17]

    T. P. Devereaux and D. Einzel, Electronic Raman scattering in superconductors as a probe of anisotropic electron pairing, Physical Review B51, 16336 (1995)

    1995

  10. [18]

    Cardona, Raman scattering in high-T c superconductors: Phonons, electrons, and electron–phonon interaction, Physica C: Superconductivity317–318, 30 (1999)

    M. Cardona, Raman scattering in high-T c superconductors: Phonons, electrons, and electron–phonon interaction, Physica C: Superconductivity317–318, 30 (1999)

    1999

  11. [19]

    Blumberg, A

    G. Blumberg, A. Mialitsin, B. S. Dennis, M. V. Klein, N. D. Zhigadlo, and J. Karpinski, Observation of Leggett’s collective mode in a multi-band MgB 2 superconductor, Physical Review Letters99, 227002 (2007)

    2007

  12. [20]

    M´ easson, Y

    M. M´ easson, Y. Gallais, M. Cazayous, B. Clair, P. Rodi` ere, L. Cario, and A. Sacuto, Amplitude Higgs mode in the 2H-NbSe2 superconductor, Physical Review B89, 060503 (2014)

    2014

  13. [21]

    L. Du, J. Tang, Y. Zhao, X. Li, R. Yang, X. Hu, X. Bai, X. Wang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. Shi, G. Yu, X. Bai, T. Hasan, G. Zhang, and Z. Sun, Lattice Dynamics, Phonon Chirality, and Spin–Phonon Coupling in 2D itinerant ferro- magnet Fe3GeTe2, Advanced Functional Materials...

    2019

  14. [22]

    L. J. Sandilands, Y. Tian, K. W. Plumb, Y.-J. Kim, and K. S. Burch, Scattering Continuum and Possible Fractionalized Excitations in$α$-RuCl$ 3$, Physical Review Letters114, 147201 (2015), arXiv:1504.05202 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2015 arXiv

  15. [23]

    hidden order

    H.-H. Kung, R. E. Baumbach, E. D. Bauer, V. K. Thorsmølle, W.-L. Zhang, K. Haule, J. A. Mydosh, and G. Blumberg, Chirality density wave of the “hidden order” phase in URu 2Si2, Science347, 1339 (2015)

    2015

  16. [24]

    S. Wu, B. R. Ortiz, H. Tan, S. D. Wilson, B. Yan, T. Birol, and G. Blumberg, Charge density wave order in the kagome metal$A{\mathrm{V}} {3}{\mathrm{Sb}} {5}$ $(A=\mathrm{Cs},\mathrm{Rb},\mathrm{K})$, Physical Review B 105, 155106 (2022)

    2022

  17. [25]

    G. Liu, X. Ma, K. He, Q. Li, H. Tan, Y. Liu, J. Xu, W. Tang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Gao, Y. Dai, H.-H. Wen, B. Yan, and X. Xi, Observation of anomalous amplitude modes in the kagome metal CsV 3Sb5, Nature Communications 13, 3461 (2022). 17

    2022

  18. [26]

    Kogar, A

    A. Kogar, A. Zong, P. E. Dolgirev, X. Shen, J. Straquadine, Y.-Q. Bie, X. Wang, T. Rohwer, I.-C. Tung, Y. Yang, R. Li, J. Yang, S. Weathersby, S. Park, M. E. Kozina, E. J. Sie, H. Wen, P. Jarillo-Herrero, I. R. Fisher, X. Wang, and N. Gedik, Light-induced charge density wave i...

    2020

  19. [27]

    Singh, G

    B. Singh, G. McNamara, K.-M. Kim, S. Siddique, S. D. Funni, W. Zhang, X. Luo, P. Sakrikar, E. M. Kenney, R. Singha, S. Alekseev, S. A. A. Ghorashi, T. J. Hicken, C. Baines, H. Luetkens, Y. Wang, V. M. Plisson, M. Geiwitz, C. A. Occhialini, R. Comin, M. J. Graf, L. Zhao, J. Can...

    2024 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Y. Jia, M. Zhao, G. Gou, X. C. Zeng, and J. Li, Niobium oxide dihalides NbOX 2: A new family of two-dimensional van der Waals layered materials with intrinsic ferroelectricity and antiferroelectricity, Nanoscale Horizons4, 1113 (2019)

    2019

  21. [29]

    Helmer, M

    P. Helmer, M. Dahlqvist, and J. Rosen, Computational screening of MOX 2 transition metal oxydihalides with M = V, Nb, Ta, Mo, Ru, or Os, and X = Cl, Br, or I, Journal of Materials Chemistry C13, 4769 (2025)

    2025

  22. [30]

    X. Luo, L. Zullo, S. Patel, D. Oh, W. Mihalyi-Koch, E. Lian, J. Li, Q. Song, A. K. Kundu, A. Rajapitamahuni, E. Vescovo, N. Olszowska, R. Kurleto, D. Wutke, X. Roy, G. Sangiovanni, and R. Comin, Robust Orbital-Selective Flat Bands in Layered Transition-Metal Oxyhalides at Room...

    2026

  23. [31]

    C. Bao, V. Eggers, M. Meierhofer, J. Helml, L. M¨ unster, S. Ito, L. Machtl, S. Zajusch, G. Inzani, L. Wittmann, M. Liebich, R. Wallauer, U. H¨ ofer, and R. Huber, Observation of an isolated flat band in the van der Waals crystal NbOCl2, Commu- nications Materials7, 60 (2026),...

    2026

  24. [32]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, A. Demir, S. Fang, S. L. Tomarken, J. Y. Luo, J. D. Sanchez-Yamagishi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, R. C. Ashoori, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Correlated insulator behaviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Nature556, 80 (2018)

    2018

  25. [33]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Unconventional superconduc- tivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Nature556, 43 (2018)

    2018

  26. [34]

    E. C. Regan, D. Wang, C. Jin, M. I. B. Utama, B. Gao, X. Wei, S. Zhao, W. Zhao, K. Yumigeta, M. Blei, J. Carlstroem, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, S. Tongay, M. Crommie, A. Zettl, and F. Wang, Optical detection of Mott and generalized Wigner crystal states in WSe 2/WS2 moir´ e su...

    2020 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Wang, E.-M

    L. Wang, E.-M. Shih, A. Ghiotto, L. Xian, D. A. Rhodes, C. Tan, M. Claassen, D. M. Kennes, Y. Bai, B. Kim, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, X. Zhu, J. Hone, A. Rubio, A. N. Pasupathy, and C. R. Dean, Correlated electronic phases in twisted bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides, N...

    2020

  28. [36]

    E. Y. Andrei and A. H. MacDonald, Graphene bilayers with a twist, Nature Materials19, 1265 (2020)

    2020

  29. [37]

    E. Y. Andrei, D. K. Efetov, P. Jarillo-Herrero, A. H. MacDonald, K. F. Mak, T. Senthil, E. Tutuc, A. Yazdani, and A. F. Young, The marvels of moir´ e materials, Nature Reviews Materials6, 201 (2021)

    2021

  30. [38]

    Q. Ma, A. G. Grushin, and K. S. Burch, Topology and geometry under the nonlinear electromagnetic spotlight, Nature Materials20, 1601 (2021)

    2021

  31. [39]

    T¨ orm¨ a, Essay: Where Can Quantum Geometry Lead Us?, Physical Review Letters131, 240001 (2023)

    P. T¨ orm¨ a, Essay: Where Can Quantum Geometry Lead Us?, Physical Review Letters131, 240001 (2023)

    2023

  32. [40]

    Liu, X.-B

    T. Liu, X.-B. Qiang, H.-Z. Lu, and X. C. Xie, Quantum geometry in condensed matter, National Science Review12, nwae334 (2025)

    2025

  33. [41]

    J. Yu, B. A. Bernevig, R. Queiroz, E. Rossi, P. T¨ orm¨ a, and B.-J. Yang, Quantum geometry in quantum materials, npj Quantum Materials10, 101 (2025)

    2025

  34. [42]

    Jiang, T

    Y. Jiang, T. Holder, and B. Yan, Revealing quantum geometry in nonlinear quantum materials, Reports on Progress in Physics88, 076502 (2025)

    2025

  35. [43]

    Verma, P

    N. Verma, P. J. W. Moll, T. Holder, and R. Queiroz, Quantum geometry and the hidden scales in materials, Nature Reviews Physics8, 226 (2026)

    2026

  36. [44]

    Peotta and P

    S. Peotta and P. T¨ orm¨ a, Superfluidity in topologically nontrivial flat bands, Nature Communications6, 8944 (2015)

    2015

  37. [45]

    Verma, T

    N. Verma, T. Hazra, and M. Randeria, Optical spectral weight, phase stiffness, andTc bounds for trivial and topological flat band superconductors, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America118, e2106744118 (2021)

    2021

  38. [46]

    T¨ orm¨ a, S

    P. T¨ orm¨ a, S. Peotta, and B. A. Bernevig, Superconductivity, superfluidity and quantum geometry in twisted multilayer systems, Nature Reviews Physics4, 528 (2022)

    2022

  39. [47]

    Souza, T

    I. Souza, T. Wilkens, and R. M. Martin, Polarization and localization in insulators: Generating function approach, Physical Review B62, 1666 (2000)

    2000

  40. [48]

    Ghosh, Y

    B. Ghosh, Y. Onishi, S.-Y. Xu, H. Lin, L. Fu, and A. Bansil, Probing quantum geometry through optical conductivity and magnetic circular dichroism, Science Advances10, eado1761 (2024)

    2024

  41. [49]

    D. Mao, J. F. Mendez-Valderrama, and D. Chowdhury, Low-energy optical absorption in correlated insulators: Projected sum rules and the role of quantum geometry, Physical Review B112, 075116 (2025)

    2025

  42. [50]

    D. P. Carmichael and M. Claassen, Probing the Quantum Geometry of Correlated Metals using Optical Conductivity (2025), arXiv:2504.11428

    2025

  43. [51]

    P. M. Chiu, Optical signatures of flat bands and anisotropic quantum geometry in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene, Physical Review B113, 205416 (2026)

    2026

  44. [52]

    Onishi and L

    Y. Onishi and L. Fu, Quantum weight: A fundamental property of quantum many-body systems (2024), arXiv:2406.06783

    2024 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Verma and R

    N. Verma and R. Queiroz, Instantaneous response and quantum geometry of insulators, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America122, e2405837122 (2025)

    2025

  46. [54]

    Ozawa and N

    T. Ozawa and N. Goldman, Extracting the quantum metric tensor through periodic driving, Physical Review B97, 201117 (2018)

    2018

  47. [55]

    Walicki, C

    M. Walicki, C. J. Eckhardt, and M. A. Sentef, Floquet engineering nearly flat bands through quantum-geometric light- 18 matter coupling with surface polaritons (2024), arXiv:2406.01298

    2024 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Talkington and M

    S. Talkington and M. Claassen, Dissipation-induced flat bands, Physical Review B106, L161109 (2022)

    2022

  49. [57]

    Koller, V

    E. Koller, V. Leeb, N. B. Perkins, and J. Knolle, Raman Circular Dichroism and Quantum Geometry of Chiral Quantum Spin Liquids (2025), arXiv:2503.14091

    2025 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Mao and D

    D. Mao and D. Chowdhury, Diamagnetic response and phase stiffness for interacting isolated narrow bands, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America120, e2217816120 (2023)

    2023

  51. [59]

    W. T. Tai and M. Claassen, Quantum-Geometric Light-Matter Coupling in Correlated Quantum Materials (2023), arXiv:2303.01597

    2023 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Antebi, J

    O. Antebi, J. Mitscherling, and T. Holder, Drude weight of an interacting flat-band metal, Physical Review B110, L241111 (2024), arXiv:2407.09599

    2024 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Garc ´ ıa-Ruiz, J

    A. Garc ´ ıa-Ruiz, J. J. P. Thompson, M. Mucha-Kruczy´ nski, and V. I. Fal’ko, Electronic Raman Scattering in Twistronic Few-Layer Graphene, Physical Review Letters125, 197401 (2020)

    2020

  54. [62]

    J. P. Provost and G. Vallee, Riemannian structure on manifolds of quantum states, Communications in Mathematical Physics76, 289 (1980)

    1980

  55. [63]

    M. V. Berry, Quantal Phase Factors Accompanying Adiabatic Changes, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences392, 45 (1984)

    1984

  56. [64]

    Resta, The Insulating State of Matter: A Geometrical Theory, The European Physical Journal B79, 121 (2011)

    R. Resta, The Insulating State of Matter: A Geometrical Theory, The European Physical Journal B79, 121 (2011)

    2011

  57. [65]

    E. I. Blount, Formalisms of Band Theory, inSolid State Physics, Vol. 13, edited by F. Seitz and D. Turnbull (Academic Press, 1962) pp. 305–373

    1962

  58. [66]

    D. E. Parker, T. Morimoto, J. Orenstein, and J. E. Moore, Diagrammatic approach to nonlinear optical response with application to Weyl semimetals, Physical Review B99, 045121 (2019)

    2019

  59. [67]

    Wilczek and A

    F. Wilczek and A. Zee, Appearance of Gauge Structure in Simple Dynamical Systems, Physical Review Letters52, 2111 (1984)

    1984

  60. [68]

    Y.-Q. Ma, S. Chen, H. Fan, and W.-M. Liu, Abelian and non-abelian quantum geometric tensor, Physical Review B81, 245129 (2010)

    2010

  61. [69]

    L. Chen, T. Mazaheri, A. Seidel, and X. Tang, The impossibility of exactly flat non-trivial Chern bands in strictly local periodic tight binding models, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical47, 152001 (2014), arXiv:1311.4956

    2014 arXiv

  62. [70]

    This dispersion also leads to cross terms between interband components of the bare diamagnetic vertex and interband Coulomb scattering, contributing an additionalnon-resonantcorrection (Appendix C 2)

  63. [71]

    F. Wu, T. Lovorn, E. Tutuc, I. Martin, and A. H. MacDonald, Topological Insulators in Twisted Transition Metal Dichalco- genide Homobilayers, Physical Review Letters122, 086402 (2019)

    2019

  64. [72]

    Devakul, V

    T. Devakul, V. Cr´ epel, Y. Zhang, and L. Fu, Magic in twisted transition metal dichalcogenide bilayers, Nature Communi- cations12, 6730 (2021)

    2021

  65. [73]

    Vitale, K

    V. Vitale, K. Atalar, A. A. Mostofi, and J. Lischner, Flat band properties of twisted transition metal dichalcogenide homo- and heterobilayers of MoS 2, MoSe2, WS2, and WSe 2, 2D Materials8, 045010 (2021)

    2021

  66. [74]

    L. Xian, M. Claassen, D. Kiese, M. M. Scherer, S. Trebst, D. M. Kennes, and A. Rubio, Realization of nearly dispersionless bands with strong orbital anisotropy from destructive interference in twisted bilayer MoS 2, Nature Communications12, 5644 (2021)

    2021

  67. [75]

    K. F. Mak and J. Shan, Semiconductor moir´ e materials, Nature Nanotechnology17, 686 (2022)

    2022

  68. [76]

    D. X. Nguyen and D. T. Son, Probing the spin structure of the fractional quantum Hall magnetoroton with polarized Raman scattering, Physical Review Research3, 023040 (2021)

    2021

  69. [77]

    N. Paul, A. Abouelkomsan, A. Reddy, and L. Fu, Shining light on collective modes in moir´ e fractional Chern insulators, arXiv:2502.17569 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  70. [78]

    B. M. Kousa, N. Morales-Dur´ an, T. M. R. Wolf, E. Khalaf, and A. H. MacDonald, Theory of magnetoroton bands in moir´ e materials (2026), 2502.17574

    2026 arXiv

  71. [79]

    G. L. G. Sleijpen and D. R. Fokkema, BiCGstab(l) for linear equations involving unsymmetric matrices with complex spectrum, Electronic Transactions on Numerical Analysis1, 13 (1993)

    1993

Pith tools

Reviewed July 30, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.