Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 32 references

B2 1308+326: a changing-look blazar or not?

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that B2 1308+326 is not a genuine changing-look blazar but an intrinsic flat-spectrum radio quasar whose broad emission lines are temporarily diluted by enhanced jet emission during high states.

desk verdict Nice new spectrum and a real EW drop, but the L_AD/L_Edd diagnostic is tautological—worth publishing after the authors either fix it or explicitly de-emphasize it. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.10552 v1 pith:DOTPZISA submitted 2024-12-13 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.GA

Ashwani Pandey , Chen Hu , Jian-Min Wang , Bozena Czerny , Yong-Jie Chen , Yu-Yang Songsheng , Yi-Lin Wang , Hao Zhang
show 1 more author
Jesus Aceituno
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HEastro-ph.GA
keywords changing-lookblazarB21308+326flat-spectrumradioquasarBLLacertaeobjectMgIIemissionlineEddingtonratiojetcontinuumdilutionsynchrotronpeakshift
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that B2 1308+326, a blazar whose synchrotron peak shifted between two states, is not a true changing-look blazar. Comparing a 2006 SDSS spectrum with a new 2024 CAHA spectrum, the authors find the continuum brightened by a factor of about 4.4 while the Mg II line flux dropped by only 1.4 ± 0.2, shrinking the line's equivalent width from about 20 Å to about 3 Å. That mimics the FSRQ-to-BL Lac transition, but the inferred accretion disk luminosity remains above one percent of Eddington in both epochs, and the black hole mass is unchanged. The authors conclude the source is intrinsically a flat-spectrum radio quasar whose broad lines are temporarily diluted by enhanced non-thermal jet emission during high states.

What carries the argument

The central diagnostic is the Eddington ratio λ = LAD/LEdd built from two Mg II scalings: Equation (2) derives black hole mass from line luminosity and FWHM with slope b = 0.63, and Equation (3) converts line luminosity to disk luminosity with slope b = 0.68. Because the two exponents nearly cancel, λ ends up proportional to $FWHM^{{-2}}$ times a constant, so the threshold λ > $10^{-2}$ is essentially a statement about line width rather than about accretion state. The other load-bearing tool is the equivalent-width comparison of Mg II across two epochs, which converts the continuum rise and line-flux drop into the apparent FSRQ-to-BL Lac class change.

What would settle it

Take a new spectrum when the source returns to a low continuum state: if the Mg II equivalent width stays below 5 Å while the continuum is faint and the inferred λ drops below $10^{-2}$, the intrinsic-FSRQ claim fails; if the EW climbs back toward about 20 Å as the continuum fades, the dilution interpretation is supported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that the apparent changing-look behaviour of B2 1308+326 is a masking effect rather than a physical transformation. The Mg II equivalent width fell from roughly 20 Å to 3 Å between MJD 53819 and MJD 60479, crossing the 5 Å boundary that separates FSRQs from BL Lacs, yet the ratio λ = LAD/LEdd estimated from the Mg II line luminosity and width stays above $10^{-2}$ in both epochs, meaning radiatively efficient accretion continues. With the black hole mass consistent at log MBH = 8.44 M⊙, the paper reads the transition as an FSRQ that appears as a BL Lac when enhanced jet continuum dilutes the emission lines.

Load-bearing premise

The case that B2 1308+326 is intrinsically an FSRQ rests on a single-line diagnostic: λ is computed only from the Mg II line's luminosity and width, and because the two scaling exponents almost cancel, λ > $10^{-2}$ is nearly guaranteed whenever a broad Mg II line is detected, so the FSRQ label is hard to avoid.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the source is intrinsically an FSRQ, its changing-look appearance is a response to jet variability, not a change in the accretion regime; the broad-line region persists through the flare.
  • Classification of blazars by optical equivalent width alone can mislabel flaring FSRQs as BL Lacs, so epoch-dependent classification should be treated cautiously.
  • The accretion disk in B2 1308+326 remains radiatively efficient (λ > 10^-2), so the Eddington-ratio criterion for the FSRQ/BL Lac dichotomy still places the source among FSRQs in both states.
  • Multi-epoch spectral comparisons should correct for jet-continuum dilution before inferring intrinsic line changes; the factor ~4.4 continuum rise with only ~1.4 line drop is the signature of dilution.
  • The Fe II flux rising by roughly a factor of 2 while Mg II falls suggests the two line species may trace different emitting regions, a pattern worth testing in other changing-look blazars.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because λ is effectively FWHM^{-2} times a constant, the λ > 10^-2 test would pass for essentially any detected broad Mg II line narrower than about 27,000 km/s; this suggests the FSRQ classification here is driven by line detection itself, not by independent accretion evidence.
  • The same dilution mechanism may explain other reported changing-look blazars whose spectral transitions coincide with flaring; applying the λ test with the cancellation caveat to a sample of CLB candidates would show how many are genuine versus apparent.
  • A testable extension would be monitoring B2 1308+326 through a full flare-decay cycle: if the Mg II EW recovers to about 20 Å as the continuum fades, the masking interpretation is confirmed; if the line stays weak at low continuum, a true change of look would be indicated.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper investigates whether B2 1308+326 is a genuine changing-look blazar by comparing an archival SDSS spectrum (2006) with a new CAHA spectrum (2024). The authors find that the 3000 Å continuum increased by a factor of ~4.4, the Mg II line flux decreased by a factor of ~1.4, and the Mg II equivalent width dropped from ~20 Å to ~3 Å, crossing the FSRQ/BL Lac classification boundary. Using the Mg II line luminosity and FWHM, they derive black hole masses and accretion-disk-to-Eddington luminosity ratios λ > 10^-2 in both epochs, and conclude that B2 1308+326 is intrinsically an FSRQ that appears as a BL Lac during high flux states because of enhanced non-thermal jet emission.

Significance. The observational finding of a large equivalent-width drop driven by a continuum increase is interesting and adds to the sample of candidate changing-look blazars whose transitions are apparent rather than intrinsic. If the FSRQ conclusion were independently supported, the paper would strengthen the 'masquerading BL Lac' interpretation. However, the quantitative support for the FSRQ classification currently rests on a diagnostic that is algebraically degenerate, as detailed below. The paper is clearly written and the data handling is transparent.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3, Eqs. (2)-(3), Table 2] The λ = L_AD/L_Edd diagnostic is degenerate because both L_AD (Eq. 3) and L_Edd (via M_BH from Eq. 2) are derived from L_MgII. Substituting Eqs. (2) and (3) yields log λ = 4.68 + 0.05 log L_MgII − 2 log FWHM, so with L_MgII ≈ 10^43.7 erg/s the condition λ > 10^-2 is satisfied for any FWHM < ~27,000 km/s. Since the Mg II line is detected as broad with FWHM ~2,500–3,400 km/s, λ > 10^-2 is guaranteed by construction and cannot distinguish an FSRQ from a BL Lac once a broad line is present. The values in Table 2 therefore do not provide independent support for the claim that B2 1308+326 is intrinsically an FSRQ; the authors should either use an independent estimate of L_AD (e.g., from SED decomposition) or explicitly acknowledge that the classification is not established by this test.
  2. [Section 4, Table 1] The reported decrease in Mg II line flux by a factor of 1.4 ± 0.2 is only marginally significant once the ~10% absolute flux-calibration uncertainty is propagated in quadrature with the statistical uncertainties. The abstract and Section 4 present the decrease as a robust result. The authors should report a combined systematic-plus-statistical uncertainty and state the significance, or reframe the result to emphasize the equivalent-width change, which is a within-spectrum ratio and is robust to absolute calibration.
  3. [Section 3, Eq. (2)] The coefficients a = 1.70 and b = 0.63 from Shaw et al. (2012) are calibrated for the continuum luminosity at 3000 Å, not for the Mg II line luminosity. Using L_MgII in Eq. (2) without re-calibrating the coefficients may introduce a bias in M_BH; the authors should justify this substitution or use a virial estimator calibrated with L_MgII. This does not affect the qualitative degeneracy in the first comment, but it should be addressed for the reported M_BH values.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 2, first paragraph] The phrase 'we didn’t take any images' is informal; also, the description of the comparison-star photometric calibration would be clearer if the exposure times and filters were specified.
  2. [Section 3, paragraph 3] The sentence describing the Mg II doublet fitting for SDSS and CAHA would be clearer if the number of Gaussian components per doublet were stated explicitly, e.g., 'two Gaussians per doublet (narrow and broad) for SDSS and one Gaussian per doublet for CAHA.'
  3. [Section 4, paragraph 1] The phrase 'an order of two shifts' is ambiguous; the synchrotron peak shifted by about two orders of magnitude in frequency (from 10^12.9 to 10^14.8 Hz), not by a factor of two, so the wording should be revised.
  4. [Table 2 caption] The ±0.26 uncertainties on log L_AD appear to reflect the intrinsic scatter of the scaling relation in Eq. (3) rather than measurement uncertainties; the caption or text should state this explicitly.
  5. [Acknowledgments] There is a typo in the acknowledgment: 'Centro Astronómico Hispanoen Andalucía' should likely read 'Centro Astronómico Hispano Alemán' or 'Hispano en Andalucía'.
  6. [Section 2, extinction correction] The text attributes the V-band extinction value to NED; the original source (Schlafly & Finkbeiner 2011) is already in the reference list and should be cited directly.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 8.0 of 10

Section 3's λ = LAD/LEdd diagnostic is algebraically forced above 10^-2 for any broad Mg II line with FWHM below ~27,000 km/s, so it cannot independently support the claim that B2 1308+326 is intrinsically an FSRQ.

  1. self definitional [Section 3, Eqs. (2)–(3) and Table 2]
    "Since in blazars (or jetted-AGN, in general), the UV/optical emission can be contaminated by the non-thermal jet emission, in Equation 2 we used LMgII instead of λLλ and adopted the corresponding coefficients (a = 1.70, b = 0.63) from Shaw et al. (2012), to obtain MBH. ... log LAD = (16.76 ± 0.26) + (0.68 ± 0.01) logLMgII (3). We then computed the ratio λ = LAD/LEdd. ... Both λ values are larger than 10−2, the threshold limit for a blazar to be categorised as an FSRQ."

    Substituting Eq. (2) into LEdd = 1.26×10^38 MBH/Msun and Eq. (3) for LAD gives log λ = 4.68 + 0.05 log L_MgII − 2 log FWHM. With the measured log L_MgII ≈ 43.7, λ > 10−2 is algebraically equivalent to FWHM < ~27,000 km/s; the measured FWHM values are 2,500–3,400 km/s, so the threshold is satisfied automatically for any detected broad line. Because L_MgII enters both the numerator (LAD) and denominator (LEdd via MBH), the ratio carries no independent information about accretion state; the conclusion 'intrinsically an FSRQ' is predetermined by the choice of the two scaling relations rather than by the data.

full rationale

The paper's observational result (continuum up by ~4.4, Mg II line flux down by ~1.4, EW 20→3 Å) is genuine and not circular. The circularity is confined to the quantitative classification step: λ is computed from L_MgII twice, via Eq. (2) for MBH/LEdd and Eq. (3) for LAD. The exponents 0.63 and 0.68 almost cancel, leaving λ ∝ FWHM^-2 L_MgII^0.05, so for any detected broad line with FWHM below ~27,000 km/s, λ > 10^-2 automatically. The Table 2 values therefore cannot distinguish an FSRQ from a BL Lac once a broad line is present; the conclusion that the source is intrinsically an FSRQ is forced by the chosen scaling rather than by the data. This is a definitional reduction, not an independent physical test. The EW-based apparent classification change is unaffected, but the central quantitative support for the paper's main claim is circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities or fitted constants of its own; it relies on published scaling relations between Mg II luminosity, black hole mass, and accretion disk luminosity. The key ledger issue is that the LAD/LEdd diagnostic is constructed from the same L_MgII measurement in both numerator and denominator, so the classification output is structurally guaranteed for typical line widths.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Mg II line luminosity traces accretion disk luminosity (Zamaninasab et al. 2014 scaling, Eq. 3).
    Used to convert the measured line luminosity into LAD; the relation is calibrated on a sample and has scatter, but is adopted without revision. This assumption is central because LAD is not directly measured from the continuum.
  • domain assumption Virial black hole mass scaling using Mg II line width and luminosity (Shaw et al. 2012, Eq. 2).
    Used with L_MgII and FWHM to derive MBH; assumes a virialized broad-line region.
  • domain assumption The 5 Angstrom equivalent width threshold separates FSRQs from BL Lacs (Stocke et al. 1991).
    Used to classify the source as FSRQ or BL Lac based on the measured Mg II EW.
  • domain assumption lambda = LAD/LEdd above 0.01 indicates radiatively efficient accretion and FSRQ nature (Ghisellini et al. 2011).
    Used in Section 4 to conclude the source is intrinsically an FSRQ despite the low EW; the test is shown to be non-discriminative because of the shared L_MgII dependence.
  • domain assumption The 2024 CAHA absolute flux calibration is accurate to about 10 percent, based on a comparison of four unrelated objects.
    Used when comparing fluxes across the two instruments; the comparison standards actually differed by up to 15 percent for one object.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of B2 1308+326: a changing-look blazar or not?." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DOTPZISA

@misc{pith2026241210552,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: B2 1308+326: a changing-look blazar or not?},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DOTPZISA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.10552}
}
abstract

In our previous study, we identified a shift in the synchrotron peak frequency of the blazar B2 1308$+$326 from 10$^{12.9}$ Hz to 10$^{14.8}$ Hz during a flare, suggesting it could be a changing-look blazar (CLB). In this work, we investigate the CL behaviour of B2 1308+326 by analysing a newly acquired optical spectrum and comparing it with an archival spectrum. We find that between the two epochs, the continuum flux increased by a factor of $\sim$4.4, while the Mg II emission line flux decreased by a factor of 1.4$\pm$0.2. Additionally, the equivalent width of the Mg II line reduced from $\sim 20$ \AA \ to $\sim 3$ \AA, indicating an apparent shift from a flat-spectrum radio quasar (FSRQ) class to a BL Lacertae (BL Lac) class. Despite this apparent change, the ratio of accretion disk luminosity to Eddington luminosity remains $>$ 10$^{-2}$ during both epochs, indicating efficient accretion persists in B2 1308$+$326. The measured black hole mass remains consistent with an average $\log M_{\rm BH} = 8.44$ M$_{\odot}$. Our findings suggest that B2 1308$+$326 is not a genuine CLB, but rather an intrinsic FSRQ that emerges as a BL Lac during high-flux states due to enhanced non-thermal emission.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.10552 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A comparison of two CAHA spectra, each with an exposure time of ∼1200 s, taken on MJD 60479. We limited the spectra to the wavelength range of 4500–6500 ˚A, as it contains high-quality data. (FSRQs) and BL Lacertae objects (BL Lacs) based on their UV/optical spectra; FSRQs have BELs (EW > 5 ˚A) in their spectra while the spectra of BL Lacs are mostly featureless (Stocke et al. 1991). A physical distinction between t… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. A comparison of observed SDSS and CAHA spectra over the wavelength range 4500-6500 ˚A . 2. OBSERVATIONS AND DATA REDUCTION We examined two spectra of B2 1308+326; one archival Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) spectrum2 and one new observation with the Centro Astron´omico Hispano-Alem´an (CAHA) telescope. The archival SDSS spectrum was taken on 2006 March 25 (MJD 53819) and corresponds to plate ID 2029 and fiber numbe… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. A fit to the spectra of B2 1308+326; Left panel: SDSS spectrum. Right panel: CAHA spectrum. Mg II line. By combining the two spectra, we achieved an improved S/N ratio of ∼85 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Rest frame spectra of B2 1308+326. Vertical blue dashed lines show the continuum windows while the red solid lines indicate the Mg II line window. Facilities: SDSS, CAHA Software: IRAF (Tody 1986) APPENDIX A. LINE FLUX MEASUREMENT USING SIMPLE INTEGRATION We measured t…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A., Ackermann, M., Agudo, I., et al

    Abdo, A. A., Ackermann, M., Agudo, I., et al. 2010, ApJ, 716, 30, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/716/1/30

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/716/1/30 2010

  2. [2]

    1993, ARA&A, 31, 473, doi: 10.1146/annurev.aa.31.090193.002353

    Antonucci, R. 1993, ARA&A, 31, 473, doi: 10.1146/annurev.aa.31.090193.002353

    arXiv 1993

  3. [3]

    A., Ferland, G

    Baldwin, J. A., Ferland, G. J., Korista, K. T., Hamann, F., & LaCluyz´ e, A. 2004, ApJ, 615, 610, doi: 10.1086/424683

    doi:10.1086/424683 2004

  4. [4]

    A., Ferland, G

    Baldwin, J. A., Ferland, G. J., Korista, K. T., et al. 1996, ApJ, 461, 664, doi: 10.1086/177093

    doi:10.1086/177093 1996

  5. [5]

    2013, MNRAS, 432, L66, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slt041

    Tagliaferri, G. 2013, MNRAS, 432, L66, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slt041

    doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slt041 2013

  6. [6]

    2011, MNRAS, 414, 2674, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18578.x

    Ghisellini, G., Tavecchio, F., Foschini, L., & Ghirlanda, G. 2011, MNRAS, 414, 2674, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18578.x

    arXiv 2011

  7. [7]

    C., & Wild, V

    Hewett, P. C., & Wild, V. 2010, MNRAS, 405, 2302, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16648.x

    arXiv 2010

  8. [8]

    C., et al

    Hu, C., Wang, J.-M., Ho, L. C., et al. 2008, ApJ, 687, 78, doi: 10.1086/591838 —. 2012, ApJ, 760, 126, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/760/2/126

    doi:10.1086/591838 2008

Show all 32 references
  1. [9]

    2020, ApJ, 905, 75, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abc2da 8

    Hu, C., Li, S.-S., Guo, W.-J., et al. 2020, ApJ, 905, 75, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abc2da 8

    2020 doi

  2. [10]

    2021, ApJS, 253, 20, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/abd774

    Hu, C., Li, S.-S., Yang, S., et al. 2021, ApJS, 253, 20, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/abd774

    2021 doi

  3. [11]

    R., & Gu, M

    Liu, Y., Jiang, D. R., & Gu, M. F. 2006, ApJ, 637, 669, doi: 10.1086/498639 MAGIC Collaboration, Acciari, V. A., Ansoldi, S., et al. 2021, A&A, 647, A163, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039687

    2006 doi

  4. [12]

    J., & Jarvis, M

    McLure, R. J., & Jarvis, M. J. 2002, MNRAS, 337, 109, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05871.x

    2002

  5. [13]

    S., French, H

    Miller, J. S., French, H. B., & Hawley, S. A. 1978, in BL Lac Objects, ed. A. M. Wolfe, 176–187

    1978

  6. [14]

    D., Dai, X., Chen, P., et al

    Mishra, H. D., Dai, X., Chen, P., et al. 2021, ApJ, 913, 146, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abf63d

    2021 doi

  7. [15]

    2017, Nature Astronomy, 1, 0194, doi: 10.1038/s41550-017-0194

    Padovani, P. 2017, Nature Astronomy, 1, 0194, doi: 10.1038/s41550-017-0194

    2017 doi

  8. [16]

    2024, The Astrophysical Journal, 968, 81, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4a56

    Sbarufatti, B. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal, 968, 81, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4a56

    2024 doi

  9. [17]

    J., et al

    Pandey, A., Kushwaha, P., Wiita, P. J., et al. 2024a, A&A, 681, A116, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347719

    doi

  10. [18]

    L., Czerny, B., Panda, S., & Zajaˇ cek, M

    Pandey, A., Mart ´ ınez-Aldama, M. L., Czerny, B., Panda, S., & Zajaˇ cek, M. 2024b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2401.18052, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2401.18052

    doi arXiv

  11. [19]

    2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 1282, doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-02108-4

    Ricci, C., & Trakhtenbrot, B. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 1282, doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-02108-4

    2023 doi

  12. [20]

    J., Anderson, S

    Ruan, J. J., Anderson, S. F., Plotkin, R. M., et al. 2014, ApJ, 797, 19, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/797/1/19

    2014 doi

  13. [21]

    F., & Finkbeiner, D

    Schlafly, E. F., & Finkbeiner, D. P. 2011, ApJ, 737, 103, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/103

    2011 doi

  14. [22]

    S., Romani, R

    Shaw, M. S., Romani, R. W., Cotter, G., et al. 2012, ApJ, 748, 49, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/748/1/49

    2012 doi

  15. [23]

    T., Strauss, M

    Shen, Y., Richards, G. T., Strauss, M. A., et al. 2011, ApJS, 194, 45, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/194/2/45

    2011 doi

  16. [24]

    W., & Kuehr, H

    Stickel, M., Fried, J. W., & Kuehr, H. 1993, A&AS, 98, 393

    1993

  17. [25]

    T., Morris, S

    Stocke, J. T., Morris, S. L., Gioia, I. M., et al. 1991, ApJS, 76, 813, doi: 10.1086/191582

    1991 doi

  18. [26]

    1986, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Tody, D. 1986, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 627, Instrumentation in astronomy VI, ed. D. L. Crawford, 733, doi: 10.1117/12.968154

    1986 doi

  19. [27]

    M., & Padovani, P

    Urry, C. M., & Padovani, P. 1995, PASP, 107, 803, doi: 10.1086/133630

    1995 doi

  20. [28]

    Vestergaard, M., & Wilkes, B. J. 2001, ApJS, 134, 1, doi: 10.1086/320357

    2001 doi

  21. [29]

    2000, A&A, 364, 43, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0009202

    Watson, D., Smith, N., Hanlon, L., et al. 2000, A&A, 364, 43, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0009202

    2000 doi arXiv

  22. [30]

    J., & Wills, D

    Wills, B. J., & Wills, D. 1979, ApJS, 41, 689, doi: 10.1086/190638

    1979 doi

  23. [31]

    B., Wang, R., Kong, M

    Wu, X. B., Wang, R., Kong, M. Z., Liu, F. K., & Han, J. L. 2004, A&A, 424, 793, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20035845 Zajaˇ cek, M., Czerny, B., Martinez-Aldama, M. L., et al. 2020, ApJ, 896, 146, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab94ae

    2004 doi

  24. [32]

    2014, Nature, 510, 126, doi: 10.1038/nature13399

    Tchekhovskoy, A. 2014, Nature, 510, 126, doi: 10.1038/nature13399

    2014 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.