Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 51 references

Optical spectrum of distant OH/IR star V1648 Aql (IRAS 19386+0155)

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A high-resolution optical spectrum places V1648 Aql among oxygen-rich post-AGB stars.

desk verdict A careful single-object study that confirms V1648 Aql as a post-AGB star; the distance is soft but honestly hedged, and the paper deserves refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.04986 v1 pith:DOZ3BOBX submitted 2019-08-14 astro-ph.SR

V.G. Klochkova , N.S. Tavolzhanskaya This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SR
keywords post-AGBstarsV1648AqlIRAS19386+0155high-resolutionspectroscopyradialvelocitycomponentschemicalabundancesdiffuseinterstellarbandsOI7774triplet
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to establish that V1648 Aql, the optical counterpart of IRAS 19386+0155, is a post-AGB star: a low- to intermediate-mass supergiant in the short stage between the asymptotic giant branch and the planetary-nebula phase. A high-resolution optical spectrum separates stellar, circumstellar, and interstellar line components, reveals a slowly expanding circumstellar envelope, and yields $M_V \approx -5^{\mathrm{m}}$ with a lower distance limit of $d \ge 1.8$ kpc. An LTE model-atmosphere analysis gives abundances for 18 elements: an oxygen-rich composition, a large oxygen excess, no $s$-process heavy-element enhancement, and moderate selective depletion, which the paper reads as the signature of a low-mass post-AGB object. Confirming the status matters because such stars return nucleosynthesis products to the interstellar medium and are sparsely studied in the optical.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by three linked spectroscopic tools. The Na I D-line profile is decomposed into atmospheric, circumstellar, and interstellar components, with the interstellar component anchored to the mean velocity of twenty diffuse interstellar bands. The equivalent width of the OI 7774 triplet feeds an empirical luminosity calibration that gives $M_V \approx -5^{\mathrm{m}}$, and the DIB strengths are converted to interstellar reddening through an adopted calibration. A plane-parallel LTE model-atmosphere analysis supplies the fundamental parameters and the abundances of 18 elements, and a condensation-temperature plot is used to identify selective depletion. These pieces together, rather than any single line, establish the post-AGB classification.

What would settle it

Measure an independent distance to V1648 Aql, for example from a future high-precision parallax or from resolved circumstellar structure: if the distance falls well outside the 1.8 to 5 kpc window implied by $M_V \approx -5^{\mathrm{m}}$, then the OI 7774 calibration is wrong for this star and the post-AGB classification would rest on the abundance pattern alone.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, V1648 Aql is a post-AGB star. The spectrum resolves three Na I D components at $V_r = +9.2$, $-3.4$, and $-12.8$ km s$^{-1}$, assigned respectively to the stellar atmosphere, an expanding circumstellar envelope, and the interstellar medium; the interstellar assignment is reinforced by twenty diffuse interstellar bands whose mean velocity is $-12.5$ km s$^{-1}$. The OI 7774 triplet equivalent width implies $M_V \approx -5^{\mathrm{m}}$, consistent with post-AGB luminosity, and the resulting distance estimate is $d \ge 1.8$ kpc. With $T_{\mathrm{eff}} = 6800$ K and $\log g = 1.2$, the LTE model-atmosphere analysis gives $\mathrm{[O/Fe]} \approx +1.36$, no $s$-process excess in Y, Ba, or Ce, and a pattern of moderate selective depletion; the authors take this combination as confirming the post-AGB status.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the empirical OI 7774 triplet luminosity calibration: if that relation is biased for this star, the inferred $M_V \approx -5^{\mathrm{m}}$ and the $d \ge 1.8$ kpc lower limit both lose their footing.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • V1648 Aql should be counted among oxygen-rich post-AGB stars; the absence of $s$-process enhancement indicates an inefficient third dredge-up during its AGB phase.
  • The measured circumstellar expansion velocity of about 13.6 km s$^{-1}$, from the shift of the Na I component, provides a kinematic input for models of post-AGB envelope expansion and mass loss.
  • The oxygen-rich pattern with $\mathrm{O/C} > 1$ and no detected lithium points to an initial mass below roughly 4 solar masses, placing the star among low-mass post-AGB objects.
  • The close agreement between optical metal-line velocities and OH maser velocities establishes a systemic velocity that can tie future radio and optical kinematic studies of IRAS 19386+0155.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A consequence the paper leaves implicit is that the gas-phase oxygen excess and $\mathrm{O/C} > 1$ should be accompanied by oxygen-rich dust; mid-infrared spectroscopy looking for silicate emission would test whether the dust and gas compositions are consistent.
  • A testable extension is time-resolved monitoring of the weak metal emissions and the H$\alpha$ core: if a binary companion exists, as the anomalous spectral energy distribution hints, their velocities should vary periodically rather than remain fixed.
  • An independent distance measurement, from future astrometry or resolved envelope structure, would convert the luminosity argument into a direct test: $M_V \approx -5^{\mathrm{m}}$ predicts a distance window of roughly 1.8 to 5 kpc given the adopted reddening.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents a high-resolution (R ≥ 60,000) optical spectrum of the OH/IR star V1648 Aql (IRAS 19386+0155), obtained with the 6-m BTA telescope. The authors measure a heliocentric radial velocity of V_r = 10.18 ± 0.05 km/s from 349 metal absorption lines, identify a multicomponent Na I D-line profile with atmospheric, circumstellar, and interstellar components, measure velocities of 20 diffuse interstellar bands, and detect weak low-excitation metal emissions. Using the OI 7774 triplet equivalent width (1.42 Å) and an interstellar reddening E(B−V) = 0.68 from DIBs, they estimate a luminosity M_V ≈ −5 mag and a distance lower limit d ≥ 1.8 kpc. Model-atmosphere LTE analysis yields T_eff = 6800 ± 100 K, log g = 1.2 ± 0.2, ξ_t = 8.3 ± 0.5 km/s, and abundances of 18 elements, showing O-rich composition ([O/Fe] = +1.36), no s-process excess, and moderate selective depletion. The authors conclude that these parameters confirm the post-AGB status of V1648 Aql.

Significance. If the conclusions hold, this paper provides the first detailed kinematic and chemical-abundance study of an optically faint, high-latitude OH/IR star, adding a useful comparison object to the small sample of well-studied post-AGB stars. The strengths of the work include the high spectral resolution, explicit radial-velocity error estimates, the consistent decomposition of the Na I profile into three components, the matching DIB and interstellar Na velocities, and the identification of weak metal emissions. The abundance analysis is thorough in terms of line selection and error reporting from line scatter, and it uses standard model-atmosphere techniques. However, the quantitative luminosity and distance estimates rest on empirical calibrations and reddening assumptions that are acknowledged in the text as uncertain, and these feed directly into the post-AGB classification claim.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3.1.3 (Luminosity and distance)]
  2. [Section 3.2, Table 4 (Chemical composition)]
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 4 (Conclusions) vs Section 3.1.2]
  2. [Table 3]
  3. [Table 4]
  4. [Abstract and Section 4]

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the post-AGB conclusion rests on independent external calibrations and multiple measured diagnostics; the acknowledged OI 7774 calibration uncertainty is an accuracy caveat, not a circular step.

full rationale

The paper's central claim that V1648 Aql is a post-AGB star is supported by a chain of independent observations and external calibrations, not by a parameter fitted to the target quantity. The luminosity M_V ≈ -5m is obtained by measuring the OI 7774 triplet equivalent width (Wλ=1.42 Å) and applying the external MV↔Wλ(7774) calibration of Takeda et al. [30]; the reddening E(B-V)=0.68 is derived from DIB equivalent widths using the external calibration of Kos and Zwitter [26]; the model atmosphere parameters are adopted from Pereira et al. [13] and checked against Fe I/Fe II and Ti I/Ti II ionization balance. The post-AGB classification is corroborated by several independent diagnostics: the OH maser detection and variability from the literature, the three-component Na I D-line profile with a circumstellar expansion velocity typical of post-AGB stars, the oxygen-rich abundance pattern with [O/Fe]=+1.36, the absence of s-process heavy-element excess, and the Hα profile shape. None of these steps defines post-AGB status in terms of a fitted parameter, and none reduces by construction to an input. The paper itself explicitly flags the luminosity estimate as 'not quite accurate' due to the star's brightness trend and possible oxygen overabundance, and admits that 'the distance to V1648 Aql has not so far been determined precisely' — these are honest accuracy caveats, not circular reasoning. The self-citations (e.g., to the HD 56126 atlas [17] and comparison stars [19,25,49,51]) are used for line identification, comparison, and literature context, but the load-bearing measurements and the conclusion do not depend on an unverified self-citation chain. Therefore no circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities or forces. The model atmosphere parameters are derived from spectral fitting, and the distance and luminosity rely on external empirical calibrations, which are stated with caveats.

free parameters (6)
  • Effective temperature T_eff = 6800 K
    Determined by requiring Fe I/Fe II ionization balance in model atmospheres; consistent with Pereira et al. (2004).
  • Surface gravity log g = 1.2 dex
    From ionization balance and spectral fit.
  • Microturbulent velocity xi_t = 8.3 km/s
    Adjusted to remove abundance trends with line strength.
  • Interstellar color excess E(B-V) = 0.68 mag
    Averaged from eight DIBs with W_lambda greater than 10 mAngstrom using the Kos and Zwitter calibration.
  • Absolute magnitude M_V = about -5 mag
    From the OI 7774 equivalent width of 1.42 Angstrom via the Takeda et al. calibration.
  • Distance lower limit d = 1.8 kpc
    Combines M_V, apparent brightness, and extinction assumptions.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE) holds in the line-forming region
    Used in the abundance analysis; authors note non-LTE shifts are within 0.1 dex citing reference [44].
  • domain assumption Plane-parallel, stationary model atmospheres adequately describe the photosphere
    Used in the model atmosphere codes; authors restrict lines to W_lambda less than or equal to 0.25 Angstrom because the approximation may fail for stronger lines.
  • domain assumption The calibration E(B-V) to W_lambda(DIBs) is valid for this line of sight
    Used to estimate interstellar reddening from eight DIBs in Section 3.1.3.
  • domain assumption The M_V to W_lambda(OI 7774) calibration applies to V1648 Aql
    Used for the luminosity estimate; authors cite Kovtyukh et al. for metallicity effects but note the calibration can be affected by the brightness trend.
  • domain assumption The radial velocity of metal absorptions represents the stellar systemic velocity
    Used to define the zero point for the circumstellar expansion velocity of 13.6 km/s; agreement with OH maser velocity supports it.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Optical spectrum of distant OH/IR star V1648 Aql (IRAS 19386+0155)." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DOZ3BOBX

@misc{pith2026190804986,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Optical spectrum of distant OH/IR star V1648 Aql (IRAS 19386+0155)},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DOZ3BOBX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.04986}
}
abstract

An optical spectrum of the star V1648 Aql (=IRAS 19386+0155) was obtained at the 6-meter telescope with a spectral resolution of R$\ge$60\,000. Heliocentric radial velocity measured from numerous metallic absorptions is equal to V$_r$=$10.18\pm0.05$ km s$^{-1}$ (V$_{\rm LSR}$=18.1 km s$^{-1}$). We determined the atmospheric, circumstellar, and interstellar components in the profile of the NaI D~lines at V$_r$=9.2, $-3.4$, and $-12.8$ km s$^{-1}$ respectively. The averaged over twenty identified DIBs velocity V$_r$(DIBs)=$-12.5\pm0.2$ km~s$^{-1}$ coincides with the interstellar NaI component. Weak emissions with an intensity of about 10% of the local continuum level were detected in the spectrum; they are identified as low-excitation metal lines. Their averaged position, V$_r$=$8.44\pm0.28$ km s$^{-1}$, may point to the presence of a weak velocity gradient in the upper layers of the stellar atmosphere. Based on the spectroscopic data and taking into account the interstellar and circumstellar reddening, we estimated the star's luminosity M$_V\approx-5^{\rm m}$ and also obtained the lower estimate of distance d$\ge1.8$ kpc. Using the model atmosphere method, we determined the fundamental parameters and chemical abundances in the atmosphere approving the status of a post-AGB star for V1648 Aql.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.04986 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Hα profile in the spectrum of V1648 Aql. The vertical lines show the positions of Ti I 6554.23 ˚A and Ca I 6572.80 ˚A emissions. average values in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. A fragment of the V1648 Aql spectrum containing strong Si II(2) 6347 and 6371 ˚A absorptions, Fe I 6359 and 6400 ˚A emissions, an interstellar feature (DIB) λ = 6376 ˚A and an [O I] 6363 ˚A emission of ionospheric origin. The identifications of main features of the fragment are marked. Hα profiles in the spectrum of HD 56126 and in the spectrum of a classical massive supergiant α Per. The average velocity Vr=10.18 k… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The NaI 5895 ˚A line profile in the relative intensity–radial velocity coor￾dinates. The following positions of the profile components are marked: 1 – forms in the stellar atmosphere; 2 – forms in the circumstellar envelope, 3 – forms in the interstellar medium. 3.1.2. DIBs and a multicomponent profile of Na I D lines The optical spectrum of V1648 Aql contains numerous interstellar features despite a considerable di… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Abundances of chemical elements in relation to the solar ones [X/H]⊙ in the atmosphere of V1648 Aql depending on the condensation temperature Tcond from [37]. 3.2.3. On selective depletion of chemical elements For stars with gas and dust envelopes, an effective mechani…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Veen, H.J

    W.E.C.J. Veen, H.J. Habing, and T.R. Geballe, Astron and A strophys. 226, 108 (1989)

    work page 1989

  2. [2]

    B.M. Lews, J. Eder, and Y. Terzian, Astrophys. J. 362, 634 (1990). Klochkova & Tavolzhanskaya: Optical spectrum of V1648 Aql 1 5

    work page 1990

  3. [3]

    Lewis, Astrophys

    B.M. Lewis, Astrophys. J. 533, 959 (2000)

    work page 2000

  4. [4]

    Gledhill, Mon

    T.M. Gledhill, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 356, 883 (2005)

    work page 2005

  5. [5]

    T.Bl¨ ocker, Astron and Astrophys.297, 727 (1995)

    work page 1995

  6. [6]

    Herwig, Ann

    F. Herwig, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 43, 435 (2005)

    work page 2005

  7. [7]

    Di Criscienzo, P

    M. Di Criscienzo, P. Ventura, D.A Garc ` ıa-Hern` andez, etal., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 462, 395 (2016)

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    N. Liu, R. Gallino, S. Bisterzo, et al., Astrophys. J. 865, 112 (2018)

    work page 2018

Show all 51 references
  1. [9]

    Suarez, P

    O. Suarez, P. Garc ´ ıa-Lario, A. Manchado, et al., Astron and Astrophys. 458, 173 (2006)

    2006

  2. [10]

    Arkhipova, N.P

    V.P. Arkhipova, N.P. Ikonnikova, G.V. Komissarova, Ast ron. Let. 36, 269 (2010)

    2010

  3. [11]

    Hrivnak, W

    B.J. Hrivnak, W. Lu, K.A. Nault, Astron. J. 149, 184 (2015)

    2015

  4. [12]

    Hrivnak, S

    H.J. Hrivnak, S. Kwok, K.M. Volk, Astrophys. J. 331, 832 (1988)

    1988

  5. [13]

    Pereira, S

    C.B. Pereira, S. Lorenz-Martins, and M. Machado, Astron and Astrophys. 422, 637 (2004)

    2004

  6. [14]

    Panchuk, V.G

    V.E. Panchuk, V.G. Klochkova, and M.V. Yushkin, Astron. Rep. 61, 820 (2017)

    2017

  7. [15]

    Yushkin, V.G

    M.V. Yushkin, V.G. Klochkova, Preprint No. 206, SAO RAS ( Special Astrophysical Observatory RAS, 2004)

    2004

  8. [16]

    Galazutdinov, Preprint No

    G.A. Galazutdinov, Preprint No. 92, SAO RAS (Special Ast rophysical Observatory RAS, 1992)

    1992

  9. [17]

    Klochkova, E.L

    V.G. Klochkova, E.L. Chentsov, N.S. Tavolganskaya, M.V . Shapovalov, Astrophys. Bull. 62, 162 (2007)

    2007

  10. [18]

    Molina, S

    R.E. Molina, S. Giridhar, C.B. Pereira, et al., Revista M ex. Astron. Astrofis, 50, 293 (2014)

    2014

  11. [19]

    Klochkova, Mon

    V.G. Klochkova, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 272, 710, (1995)

    1995

  12. [20]

    Klochkova, V.E

    V.G. Klochkova, V.E. Panchuk, Astron. Rep. 56, 104 (2012)

    2012

  13. [21]

    Klochkova, V.E

    V.G. Klochkova, V.E. Panchuk, N.S. Tavolzhanskaya, Ast ron. Rep. 62, 623 (2018)

    2018

  14. [22]

    Jenniskens and F.X

    P. Jenniskens and F.X. D´ esert, Astron and Astrophys. Su ppl. 106, 39 (1994)

    1994

  15. [23]

    Luna, N.L.J

    R. Luna, N.L.J. Cox, M.A. Satorre, et al., Astron and Astr ophys. 480, 133 (2008)

    2008

  16. [24]

    Bakker, E.F

    E. Bakker, E.F. van Dishoeck, L.B.F.M. Waters, T. Schoen maker, Astron and Astrophys. 323, 469 (1997)

    1997

  17. [25]

    Klochkova, Astrophys

    V.G. Klochkova, Astrophys. Bull. 69, 279 (2014)

    2014

  18. [26]

    J. Kos, T. Zwitter, Astrophys. J. 774, 72 (2013)

    2013

  19. [27]

    Molina, Revista Mex

    R.E. Molina, Revista Mex. Astron. Astrofis, 54, 397 (2018)

    2018

  20. [28]

    Klochkova, M.V

    V.G. Klochkova, M.V. Yushkin, E.L. Chentsov, V.E. Panch uk, Astron. Rep. 46, 139 (2002). 16 Klochkova & Tavolzhanskaya: Optical spectrum of V1648 Aq l

    2002

  21. [29]

    Klochkova, E.L

    V.G. Klochkova, E.L. Chentsov, V.E. Panchuk, Astrophys . Bull. 74, 41 (2019)

    2019

  22. [30]

    Takeda, G

    Y. Takeda, G. Jeong, and I. Han, Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan 70, id.8 (2018)

    2018

  23. [31]

    Bl¨ ocker, Astron and Astrophys

    T. Bl¨ ocker, Astron and Astrophys. 299, 755 (1995)

    1995

  24. [32]

    Kovtyukh, N.I

    V.V. Kovtyukh, N.I. Gorlova, S.I. Belik, Mon. Not. R. Ast ron. Soc. 423, 3268 (2012)

    2012

  25. [33]

    Vickers, D.J

    S.B. Vickers, D.J. Frew, O.A. Parker, I.S. Bojicic, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 447, 1673 (2015)

    2015

  26. [34]

    Piskunov, F

    N.E. Piskunov, F. Kupka, T.A. Ryabchikova, et al., Astro n and Astrophys. Suppl. 112, 525 (1995)

    1995

  27. [35]

    Kupka, N.E

    F. Kupka, N.E. Piskunov, T.A. Ryabchikova, et al., Astro n and Astrophys. Suppl. 138, 119 (1999)

    1999

  28. [36]

    Tsymbal, ASP Conf

    V.V. Tsymbal, ASP Conf. Ser. 108, 198 (1996)

    1996

  29. [37]

    Lodders, in: Principles and Perspectives in Cosmochemistry (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010), p

    K. Lodders, in: Principles and Perspectives in Cosmochemistry (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010), p. 379 (Astrophysics and Space S cience Proc.)

    2010

  30. [38]

    Sahin, D

    T. Sahin, D. Lambert, V.G. Klochkova, N.S. Tavolganskay a, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 410, 612, (2011)

    2011

  31. [39]

    Garc ` ıa-Hernandez, O

    D.A. Garc ` ıa-Hernandez, O. Zamora, A. Yag¨ ue, et al., As tron and Astrophys. 555, id.L3 (2013)

    2013

  32. [40]

    Ventura and F

    P. Ventura and F. D‘Antona, Astron and Astrophys. 439, 1075 (2005)

    2005

  33. [41]

    Venn, Astrophys

    K. Venn, Astrophys. J. 414, 316 (1993)

    1993

  34. [42]

    K. Lind, M. Asplund, P.S. Barklem, A.K. Belyaev, Astron a nd Astrophys. 528, A103 (2011)

    2011

  35. [43]

    Wheeler, C

    J.C. Wheeler, C. Sneden, J.W.Jr. Truran, Ann. Rev. Astro n. Astrophys. 27, 279 (1989)

    1989

  36. [44]

    Sumangala Rao, S

    S. Sumangala Rao, S. Giridhar, D.L. Lambert, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 419, 1254, (2012)

    2012

  37. [45]

    Sneden, R.G

    C. Sneden, R.G. Cratton, D.A. Crocker, Astron and Astrop hys. 246, 354 (1991)

    1991

  38. [46]

    Mishenina, V.V

    T.V. Mishenina, V.V. Kovtyukh, C.Soubiran, et al., Astr on and Astrophys. 396, 189 (2002)

    2002

  39. [47]

    Takeda, H

    Y. Takeda, H. Taguchi, K. Yoshioka, et al., Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan 59, 1127 (2007)

    2007

  40. [48]

    Molina, C.B

    R.E. Molina, C.B. Pereira, A. Arellano Ferro, astro-ph- SR. 1901.058 (2019)

    2019

  41. [49]

    Klochkova, Bull

    V.G. Klochkova, Bull. Spec. Astrophys.Observ. 44, 5 (1997)

    1997

  42. [50]

    van Winckel, M

    H. van Winckel, M. Reyniers, Astron and Astrophys. 354, 135 (2000)

    2000

  43. [51]

    Klochkova, V.E

    V.G. Klochkova, V.E. Panchuk, Astron. Rep. 60, 344 (2016)

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.