Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 3 cited by

Multiple star-forming episodes of intermediate-redshift galaxies

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read More than 85% of intermediate-redshift galaxies formed stars in multiple episodes, with the first episode building roughly half the stellar mass by z≈3.

desk verdict Solid stellar population data, but the headline episode-count fractions are not established by the current fit. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.01710 v1 pith:DPBVESNW submitted 2025-09-01 astro-ph.GA

C. Muñoz López , Davor Krajnović , B. Epinat , T. Urrutia , I. Pessa , T. Contini , T. Nanayakkara , J. Pharo
show 3 more authors
T. S. Gonçalves Tran Thi Thai N. F. Bouché
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords starformationhistorygalaxyevolutionintermediateredshiftMUSEspectroscopystellarpopulationsspectralfittingstar-formingepisodesenvironment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper derives star formation histories for 393 galaxies at redshifts 0.1–0.9 from VLT/MUSE spectra integrated within one effective radius, then models each history as an exponential decay plus Gaussian peaks. It claims that more than 85% of these galaxies experienced more than one distinct star-forming episode, and that the first episode—detected as a long exponential decay—was typically complete by z≈3 and built about 40–50% of the final stellar mass. It also claims that more massive galaxies have fewer episodes, assemble their mass faster, and reach quiescence earlier than low-mass systems. If correct, galaxy assembly at these redshifts is dominated by an early, dominant event followed by later, lower-mass episodes, with field and group galaxies differing in their stellar-population properties.

What carries the argument

The 'star-forming episode' (SFE) decomposition. After computing a smoothed SFR as a function of cosmic time from bootstrapped pPXF weight fractions, the paper fits the curve as a sum of an exponential decay (the initial event) and one or more Gaussian peaks (later episodes). Counting the fitted components yields the number of episodes per galaxy, and the amplitudes, durations, and mass fractions of these components carry the mass-assembly and quenching arguments.

What would settle it

Build mock galaxy spectra from known two-episode star-formation histories in which both bursts are older than 5 Gyr, run the pPXF+bootstrap pipeline on them with the same masking and smoothing, and compare the recovered SFE count to the input. If the pipeline returns a single exponential episode for most two-burst inputs, the claim that more than 85% of real galaxies have multiple resolved episodes is an artifact of limited age resolution rather than a property of the galaxies.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms: the star formation history of an ordinary intermediate-redshift galaxy is not a single smooth event. Using full-spectrum fitting of E-MILES simple stellar population templates with a bootstrapping approach, the paper reconstructs SFR(t) at 0.5-Gyr resolution for 393 galaxies and decomposes each history into star-forming episodes. It finds that more than 85% of the galaxies have more than one episode; the initial episode is recovered as an exponentially decaying SFR that is longer than later episodes, is complete by z~3, and contributes ~40% of the stellar mass in low-mass galaxies and >50% in high-mass systems. Massive galaxies typically show only one or two episode

Load-bearing premise

A single integrated spectrum inside one effective radius, fitted with E-MILES templates and fourth-order polynomials, yields a star-formation history at 0.5-Gyr resolution reliable enough to separate distinct episodes—even though the paper notes that SSP spectra older than about 5 Gyr are nearly indistinguishable, so overlapping early episodes could be counted as one.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If more than 85% of galaxies have multiple SFEs, episodic assembly—not a single smooth history—is the normal mode of galaxy growth at 0.1<z<0.9 in the sampled mass range.
  • The first exponential episode ending by z~3 and contributing 40–50% of the final stellar mass implies that the early Universe sets the dominant mass scale of today's galaxies; later episodes are comparatively minor increments.
  • Massive galaxies having fewer, earlier episodes supports 'downsizing' at the level of resolved star formation histories: massive systems form first, quench fast, and stay quiescent.
  • Field and group galaxies differ in stellar mass, metallicity, age, and t90, whereas within-group accretion-stage differences (η) are mostly absent, pointing to environmental effects acting before or at group entry.
  • The early dominant episode links the sample to massive quiescent galaxies at z>3 found by JWST: many galaxies now observed at z~0.7 may have passed through a quiescent, little-red-dot-like phase at z~3 before later rejuvenation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the SFE decomposition is accepted, the 'initial exponential event' is still not necessarily a single burst: the paper itself notes that SSP spectra older than ~5 Gyr are nearly indistinguishable, so the exponential may blend several sub-Gyr bursts; true burst complexity could be higher than the counted 1–5 episodes.
  • A direct calibration test would run the same pipeline on mock spectra with two known bursts at ages >5 Gyr; the rate at which the fit merges them into one exponential would turn the >85% statistic into a completeness-corrected episode fraction.
  • Applying the decomposition to spatially resolved IFU data beyond 1 Reff could test whether later Gaussian episodes correspond to accreting satellites or tidal debris, tying episode counts directly to merger activity.
  • The field–group differences, if they persist after careful mass matching, could serve as a probe of pre-processing in galaxy groups, with the η>0.4 t90 difference as a first sign of environmentally triggered recent formation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper derives stellar population parameters and star formation histories for 393 intermediate-redshift (0.1<z<0.9) galaxies from integrated MUSE spectra within 1 Reff, using pPXF with E-MILES templates and a bootstrap approach. From the reconstructed SFR(t), the authors fit an exponential plus Gaussian components and identify discrete 'star-forming episodes' (SFEs). They report that more than 85% of galaxies have more than one SFE, that massive galaxies have fewer SFEs, and that an initial exponential episode built ~40-50% of stellar mass by z~3. The paper also presents mass-size, metallicity, formation timescale, and environmental trends, and discusses sample selection biases.

Significance. If the episodic decomposition were validated, the paper would provide useful observational constraints on how intermediate-redshift galaxies assemble their stellar mass, with direct implications for downsizing, quenching, and JWST-era high-redshift findings. The sample is moderately large, the MUSE data are of good quality, and the bootstrap treatment of pPXF weights is a positive feature. However, the headline quantitative claims are currently outputs of an ad hoc decomposition of a smoothed, light-weighted SFH. No model selection, no recovery simulations, and no uncertainties on the number of episodes are presented, and the paper itself admits that old SSP spectra are nearly degenerate. As submitted, the central claims are not established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sections 3.3 and 3.4, Eq. (4)] The pPXF weights are explicitly defined as V-band light-weighted fractional contributions, but Eq. (4) uses M⋆(t_i) as the 'stellar mass assembled at time t_i' with no conversion from light-weighted to mass-weighted fractions. If light weights are used as mass fractions, the reconstructed SFR normalization and all subsequent mass-fraction statements (e.g., the 40-50% assembled by z~3 in Sec. 4.5) are not the claimed quantities. This needs to be corrected, or the claims restricted to light-weighted quantities.
  2. [Section 4.4, Eq. (5)] The number of SFEs is not measured but is an output of an assumed exponential-plus-Gaussian model fitted by least squares. No model selection criterion (e.g., AIC/BIC), no uncertainties on N_SFE, and no injection-recovery tests are provided. The SFR was median-filtered and interpolated on 0.5 Gyr bins (Sec. 3.4), which can create or suppress local maxima. The >85% multi-episode statistic therefore lacks demonstrated false-positive control.
  3. [Sections 4.4 and 4.5] The paper states that SSP spectra for ages >=5 Gyr are almost indistinguishable and that the duration of the first SFE is poorly constrained and could consist of multiple bursts. The initial exponential component and its claimed ~40-50% mass fraction by z~3 lie exactly in this degenerate regime. Without mock-SFH recovery tests or a clear demonstration that the decomposition is unique in this regime, the headline conclusions are not supported.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Figure 2 caption] The caption says panels (a) and (b) are colored by 'weight fraction or bolometric luminosity'; clarify which quantity is plotted and how it relates to the V-band light-weighting discussed in Sec. 3.3.
  2. [Figures 1 and 11] Figure 1 cites the main sequence from Whitaker et al. (2017), while Figure 11 cites Whitaker et al. (2012). Harmonize the references.
  3. [Section 3.4] The smoothing and interpolation procedure is described only in words ('median SFR for the last 0.5 Gyr', 'interpolated the values using bins of 0.5 Gyr'). Specify the exact algorithm, kernel, and interpolation method so the processing is reproducible.
  4. [Abstract and Section 4.4] The abstract gives 'more than 85%'; provide the exact number and fraction, including the uncertainty, in the text and Figure 8.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The 'initial exponential SF event' is assumed in the fit by construction, and the mass fractions rest on pPXF V-band light weights relabeled as stellar mass; the >85% multi-episode statistic inherits this unvalidated decomposition.

  1. self definitional [Section 4.4, Eq. (5)]
    "After deriving the smoothed SFR for the sample ..., we assume that the SFH of a galaxy can be modelled by a exponentially decaying SFR function plus a set of Gaussian peaks. ... All galaxies have an early SFE marking the initial star-forming event and making the oldest stars. This initial SFE is typically recovered by our method with an exponential decaying SFR..."

    Eq. (5) imposes the model SFR(t)=ΣSFE_i, with an exponentially decaying component always included in the fit. The 'initial SFE' is then identified with that fitted exponential, so the statements 'all galaxies have an early SFE' and 'the initial event is an exponential decay' are true by construction rather than inferred from the data. The paper itself concedes in §4.4 that SSP spectra at ages ≥5 Gyr are almost indistinguishable and that multiple close-in-time young SFEs cannot be distinguished, and in §4.5 that the duration of the first SFE is poorly constrained and could actually be multiple bursts. The reported ~40–50% early mass fraction is the fitted amplitude/duration of this assumed exponential component. The >85% 'more than one episode' statistic is also an output of the same least-

  2. other [Sections 3.3–3.4, Eq. (4)]
    "The normalised weight distribution corresponds to the V-band light-weighted fractional contribution of a stellar population with certain age and metallicity to the overall galaxy spectrum. ... From the fitting, we obtained the age distribution and the stellar mass fraction relative to the total stellar mass of the stellar populations of a galaxy."

    The M⋆(t_i) entering Eq. (4), SFR(t_i)=M⋆(t_i)/Δt_i, is explicitly introduced two paragraphs earlier as a V-band light-weighted fractional contribution of SSPs. No mass-to-light conversion or mass-weighting step is described before this quantity is relabeled 'stellar mass fraction' and used to compute the SFR and the cumulative mass fractions presented in §4.2–4.5. Therefore the early-mass-fraction claims are the light-weighted pPXF age distribution renamed as stellar mass assembly, and the subsequent exponential+Gaussian decomposition operates on that relabeled curve. The headline mass fractions are thus dependent on the input light-weighting by definition rather than being independent mass-based measurements.

full rationale

The derivation chain is: pPXF weights → V-band light-weighted age distribution → (renamed as stellar mass) → Eq. (4) SFR → 0.5 Gyr smoothing/interpolation → Eq. (5) exponential+Gaussian decomposition → N_SFE and initial-exponential mass fraction. Two load-bearing steps reduce to inputs. First, Eq. (5) always contains an exponential; the paper equates this exponential to the 'initial SFE', so the claim that every galaxy has an early exponential star-forming event is a restatement of the ansatz. The paper's own disclaimers—old SSP spectra are almost indistinguishable, and the first SFE duration is poorly constrained and could be multiple bursts—show that the exponential is a default placeholder, not a detected feature. Second, the weights used to build M⋆(t_i) are defined as V-band light fractions, yet are called 'stellar mass fraction' before Eq. (4); the ~40–50% early mass fraction is therefore the light-weighted age distribution relabeled, with no M/L conversion. The >85% multi-episode statistic is not literally forced (Gaussians are added only when the least-squares fit prefers them), but it is also not an independent measurement: no model selection, no injection/recovery tests, and no uncertainties on N_SFE are presented, and the 0.5 Gyr smoothing sets the scale of what counts as an episode. There are no load-bearing self-citations here; the circularity is internal to the assumed parameterization and the light/mass relabeling. Score 6 reflects that part of the central claim reduces by construction, while the 85% statistic retains some fitted, but unvalidated, content.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The paper's central SFE statistics rest on several fitted or hand-chosen parameters: the number of Gaussian components, the exponential decay timescale, the Gaussian widths, the 0.5 Gyr smoothing bin, and the pPXF multiplicative polynomial order. These choices are not independently calibrated. The main domain assumptions are standard for full-spectrum fitting, but the exponential-plus-Gaussian form is ad hoc to this paper and is the direct source of the 85% multi-episode claim.

free parameters (5)
  • Number of Gaussian SFEs per galaxy = 1 to 5 (sample distribution)
    Chosen by least-squares fit to the smoothed SFR; no model selection criterion is reported (Section 4.4).
  • Exponential decay timescale of the initial SFE = mean 2 +/- 1.6 Gyr
    Fitted parameter; the paper states it is poorly constrained by the data and models (Section 4.4).
  • Gaussian sigma of subsequent SFEs = mean 0.77 +/- 0.7 Gyr
    Fitted parameter describing the width of secondary star-forming episodes.
  • SFR smoothing and interpolation bin = 0.5 Gyr
    Hand-chosen bin used to interpolate and smooth SFR(t), affecting the shape later decomposed into SFEs (Section 3.4).
  • Order of multiplicative polynomials in pPXF = 4th order
    Chosen to adapt the continuum shape; can absorb dust and age-related continuum differences, influencing recovered SSP weights (Section 3.1).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption E-MILES SSP templates accurately represent the stellar populations and their age/metallicity grid is complete.
    Used in all pPXF fits for ages, metallicities, masses, and SFH (Section 3.1).
  • domain assumption Unregularized pPXF solutions averaged over 500 bootstrap resamples recover unbiased stellar population parameters.
    Regularization is set to zero and bootstrapping is used for errors; this is asserted without validation against known SFHs (Section 3.1).
  • ad hoc to paper The star formation history can be described as an exponentially decaying component plus Gaussian episodes.
    Equation 5, Section 4.4; this is the model that defines 'episodes' and the central SFE statistics.
  • domain assumption Light-weighted SSP weights can be converted to mass-weighted SFR via SFR(t) = M*(ti)/delta-ti with template time spacing.
    Section 3.4; assumes template spacing and mass-to-light conversion give unbiased SFR(t) after smoothing.
  • standard math Age of the Universe at redshift z is computed with the adopted flat cosmology, H0 = 70, Omega_L = 0.7.
    Section 1; used to map stellar ages to cosmic times via Equation 3.
invented entities (1)
  • Gaussian star-forming episode (SFE)
    purpose: To decompose the derived SFR(t) into discrete events so the number of star-forming episodes can be counted.
    Introduced as a fitting component in Equation 5; no independent physical observable is tied to a single Gaussian episode, and the decomposition is not validated against simulated SFHs.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Multiple star-forming episodes of intermediate-redshift galaxies." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DPBVESNW

@misc{pith2026250901710,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Multiple star-forming episodes of intermediate-redshift galaxies},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DPBVESNW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.01710}
}
abstract

We derive and analyse the star formation histories of 393 intermediate-redshift (0.1 $\leq$ z $\leq$ 0.9) galaxies with stellar masses between $\sim$10$^{8}$ - 10$^{12}$ M$_{\odot}$. We probe a cosmic time of approximately 6 Gyr and a range of environments, from field (low-density systems) to rich groups (high-density systems). We find that the galaxies' stellar mean ages, metallicities, and star formation rates (SFRs) follow similar trends to galaxies as those characterising the nearby Universe. We modelled the derived SFRs, quantifying and characterising the number of star-forming episodes (SFEs). We found that more than 85$\%$ of the galaxies have more than one event of star formation, typically described with an exponentially decaying SFR and subsequent Gaussian-like episode(s) of star formation. We also observe that massive galaxies have fewer SFEs than low-mass systems and that they form their stellar mass and reach quiescence faster than lower mass galaxies. Moreover, the history of mass assembly for the most massive galaxies in the sample can be described with only one episode of star formation in the early Universe, which we detected as an exponential decrease that was longer in duration than subsequent SF events. This early event has typically been completed by z$\sim$3 and it accounts for a high fraction of the total stellar mass, from $\sim$40$\%$ for low-mass galaxies to more than 50$\%$ for higher-mass galaxies. We also analysed the dependence of stellar population parameters with the various environments probed by the sample, finding no significant correlations between different group environments; however, our field galaxies are generally distinct from group galaxies in terms of the mass, metallicity, stellar ages, and formation timescales. We discuss possible biases in the sample selection and examine how representative our galaxies are of the overall galaxy population.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.01710 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. General properties of the galaxy sample. SFR as a function of the stellar mass (derived from the MUSE spectra) for the galaxy sam￾ple, colour-coded by the spectroscopic redshift. The dotted and dashed grey lines indicate the main sequence (MS) for an age of the Universe, respectively, of 12.4 Gyr (z = 0.1) and 6.8 Gyr (z = 0.8), given by Eq. (1) of Whitaker et al. (2017). 2. Galaxy sample This work relies on data ta… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Example of the population analysis for one galaxy in the sample. Panels (a) and (b): Distribution of the stellar pPXF weights, coloured by the weight fraction or bolometric luminosity of different stellar populations with given age and metallicity. Panel (a) corresponds to the unregularised fit. Panel (b) shows the averaged weights over 500 bootstraped spectra of the original spectrum. Panel (c): Averaged weight fra… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Comparison between the stellar masses derived using different methods and the pPXF stellar population mass for galaxies in the sam￾ple. Left panel: Galaxies within the MUSE￾Wide footprint. Right panel: MAGIC galaxies. The dashed line is the one-to-one relation. The black-solid line is a linear fit to the derived masses. Symbols are coloured according to the integrated galaxy’s S/N. be used simultaneously with spectr… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Plane of effective radius (Rmaj e ) versus stellar mass coloured by SSP-equivalent population parameters measured within one effective radius. Colours of the left, central, and right panels correspond to the mean stellar age, mean stellar metallicity, and the time take…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Top: Mean mass fraction for the galaxy sample computed in bins of 0.5 Gyr. Bottom: Mean cumulative mass frac￾tion of the galaxy sample. In both panels, the colours indicate different stellar mass bins. Thick lines indicate the mean values and the surrounding shaded are…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: sSFR for the galaxy sample, av￾eraged over three mass bins, indicated by the legend, as a function of cosmic time. Thick lines correspond to the mean val￾ues and the surrounding shaded area to the 1σ dispersion of the distributions. Di￾amonds and stars indicate the mea…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: shows the time difference needed for the galaxies to assembly the 50% and 90% of their stellar mass. We observe the following: the majority of intermediate- and high-mass galaxies (> 1010.1M⊙) form the last 40% of their stellar mass in less than ∼4-5 Gyr. Some galaxies…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Number of SFEs as a function of the stellar mass. The violins show the mass distribution with the number of galaxies displayed at the top of each set. Black lines correspond to the mean of each distri￾bution. The majority of galaxies with one SFE have SFR described by …
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Mean galaxy metallicity as a function of t90 coloured by the number of SFEs, ranging from 1 to 5. Top panel shows the distribution of SFEs as a function of the galaxy formation timescale, given by t90. Similar results have been found for samples at z ∼ 1 (Gallazzi et a…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Left: t90 as a function of the stellar mass (derived from the spectra). The colours indicate different galaxy environments, quantified by the η estimator. Grey dots correspond to galaxies that do not belong to groups or structures, thus denominated field galaxies. The…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Top: Plane of effective radius (Rmaj e ) versus stellar mass coloured by SSP-equivalent population parameters measured within one effective radius. Dashed-black lines show constant velocity dispersion of 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500 km s−1 from left to right, d…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Galaxy Stellar Mass-SFR-Size Relation in EAGLE, TNG100, and Observations

    astro-ph.GA 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    EAGLE and TNG100 both reproduce the observed trend that galaxies at fixed stellar mass are more compact when their star formation deviates from the main sequence, though EAGLE predicts a stronger and TNG100 a weaker d...

  2. Episodic Star Formation -- I. Overview and Scatter of the Star-Forming Main Sequence

    astro-ph.GA 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Using TNG100, star-forming galaxies are shown to form stars in two-branch episodic cycles, whose internal SFR fluctuations (~0.2 dex) plus galaxy-to-galaxy variance (~0.15 dex) match the observed ~0.25 dex main-sequen...

  3. Built to Rest: The Evolving Star-Forming Main Sequence Requires Episodic Quiescence or Late Assembly

    astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    An analytical model of galaxies evolving along the star-forming main sequence shows that episodic quiescence or late assembly is required to reproduce observed star formation histories and avoid over-massive galaxies today.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    E., Gladders, M

    Abramson, L. E., Gladders, M. D., Dressler, A., et al. 2016, ApJ, 832,

    2016

  2. [2]

    & Dickinson, M

    Madau, P. & Dickinson, M. 2014, ARA&A, 52,

    work page 2014

  3. [3]

    J., Kacprzak, G

    Allen, R. J., Kacprzak, G. G., Glazebrook, K., et al. 2016, ApJ, 826,

    2016

  4. [4]

    Perez, J., Michel-Dansac, L., & Tissera, P. B. 2011, MNRAS, 417, 1,

    work page 2011

  5. [7]

    J., Kacprzak, G

    Allen, R. J., Kacprzak, G. G., Spitler, L. R., et al. 2015, ApJ, 806,

    2015

  6. [11]

    R., Davidzon, I., Toft, S., et al

    Weaver, J. R., Davidzon, I., Toft, S., et al. 2023, A&A, 677, A184. Weibel, A., de Graa ff, A., Setton, D. J., et al. 2025, ApJ, RUBIES Reveals a Massive Quiescent Galaxy at z = 7.3, 983, 1,

    work page 2023

  7. [13]

    A., Law, D

    Bundy, K., Bershady, M. A., Law, D. R., et al. 2015, ApJ, 798,

    2015

  8. [14]

    1993, AJ, 106,

    Campos-Aguilar, A., Moles, M., & Masegosa, J. 1993, AJ, 106,

    work page 1993

Show all 93 references
  1. [19]

    2011, MNRAS, 417,

    Wisnioski, E., Glazebrook, K., Blake, C., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 417,

    2011

  2. [24]

    G., Alonso, S., Mesa, V ., et al

    Lambas, D. G., Alonso, S., Mesa, V ., et al. 2012, A&A, 539, A45. Lelli, F., Verheijen, M., & Fraternali, F. 2014, MNRAS, 445,

    2012

  3. [27]

    aanda Strateva, I., Ivezi´c, Ž., Knapp, G

    Article number, page 13 of 18 A&A proofs: manuscript no. aanda Strateva, I., Ivezi´c, Ž., Knapp, G. R., et al. 2001, AJ, 122,

    2001

  4. [28]

    2016, ApJS, 223,

    van der Wel, A., Noeske, K., Bezanson, R., et al. 2016, ApJS, 223,

    2016

  5. [29]

    2021, ApJS, 256,

    van der Wel, A., Bezanson, R., D’Eugenio, F., et al. 2021, ApJS, 256,

    2021

  6. [33]

    Kennicutt, R. C. 1998, ARA&A, 36,

    1998

  7. [36]

    On the top part we show the magnitude in the HST F160W band, the galaxy redshift and the integrated S/N

    Panel (a): Stellar fit with Indo-US templates used to extract the global velocity dispersion, estimate S /N and build the galaxy sample. On the top part we show the magnitude in the HST F160W band, the galaxy redshift and the integrated S/N. The black line is the observed spec...

    2019

  8. [37]

    2024, Nature, A massive galaxy that formed its stars at z≈ 11, 628, 8007,

    Glazebrook, K., Nanayakkara, T., Schreiber, C., et al. 2024, Nature, A massive galaxy that formed its stars at z≈ 11, 628, 8007,

    2024

  9. [44]

    2019, A&A, 631, A87

    Ventou, E., Contini, T., Bouché, N., et al. 2019, A&A, 631, A87. Visvanathan, N. 1981, A&A, 100, L20 Wang, Y ., Dong, C., Ruan, H., et al. 2024, ApJ, 968,

    2019

  10. [48]

    2014, ApJ, 792,

    Choi, J., Conroy, C., Moustakas, J., et al. 2014, ApJ, 792,

    2014

  11. [60]

    A., Peschken, N., et al

    Athanassoula, E., Rodionov, S. A., Peschken, N., et al. 2016, ApJ, 821, 2,

    2016

  12. [69]

    1999, Spectrophotometric Dating of Stars and Galaxies, 192, 283 Wuyts, S., Förster Schreiber, N

    Worthey, G. 1999, Spectrophotometric Dating of Stars and Galaxies, 192, 283 Wuyts, S., Förster Schreiber, N. M., van der Wel, A., et al. 2011, ApJ, 742,

    1999

  13. [71]

    2024, Early Disk-Galaxy Formation from JWST to the Milky Way, 377,

    Glazebrook, K., Nanayakkara, T., Marchesini, D., et al. 2024, Early Disk-Galaxy Formation from JWST to the Milky Way, 377,

    2024

  14. [72]

    2017, Nature, A massive, quies- cent galaxy at a redshift of 3.717, 544, 7648,

    Glazebrook, K., Schreiber, C., Labbé, I., et al. 2017, Nature, A massive, quies- cent galaxy at a redshift of 3.717, 544, 7648,

    2017

  15. [73]

    2017, A&A, 602, A1

    Smolˇci´c, V ., Novak, M., Bondi, M., et al. 2017, A&A, 602, A1. Straatman, C. M. S., van der Wel, A., Bezanson, R., et al. 2018, ApJS, 239,

    2017

  16. [74]

    & Terlevich, R

    Telles, E. & Terlevich, R. 1995, MNRAS, 275,

    1995

  17. [75]

    & Maddox, S

    Telles, E. & Maddox, S. 2000, MNRAS, 311,

    2000

  18. [78]

    R., et al

    Nersesian, A., van der Wel, A., Gallazzi, A. R., et al. 2025, A&A, More is better: Strong constraints on the stellar properties of LEGA-C z ∼ 1 galaxies with Prospector, 695, A86. Noble, A. G., Geach, J. E., van Engelen, A. J., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 436, L40. Noble, A. G., Webb,...

    2025

  19. [79]

    F., & Jimenez, R

    Panter, B., Heavens, A. F., & Jimenez, R. 2003, MNRAS, 343,

    2003

  20. [88]

    E., van Dokkum, P

    Whitaker, K. E., van Dokkum, P. G., Brammer, G., et al. 2012, ApJ, 754, L29. Whitaker, K. E., Bezanson, R., van Dokkum, P. G., et al. 2017, ApJ, 838,

    2012

  21. [90]

    2017, A&A, 608, A1

    Bacon, R., Conseil, S., Mary, D., et al. 2017, A&A, 608, A1. Bacon, R., Brinchmann, J., Conseil, S., et al. 2023, A&A, 670, A4. Barone, T. M., D’Eugenio, F., Scott, N., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 512,

    2017

  22. [94]

    M., Genzel, R., Lehnert, M

    Förster Schreiber, N. M., Genzel, R., Lehnert, M. D., et al. 2006, ApJ, 645,

    2006

  23. [95]

    2005, MNRAS, 358,

    Cid Fernandes, R., Mateus, A., Sodré, L., et al. 2005, MNRAS, 358,

    2005

  24. [96]

    A., Elmegreen, B

    Zhang, H.-X., Hunter, D. A., Elmegreen, B. G., et al. 2012, AJ, 143,

    2012

  25. [104]

    Baum, W. A. 1959, PASP, 71,

    1959

  26. [106]

    Beckwith, S. V . W., Stiavelli, M., Koekemoer, A. M., et al. 2006, AJ, 132,

    2006

  27. [109]

    F., Zibetti, S., et al

    Gallazzi, A., Bell, E. F., Zibetti, S., et al. 2014, ApJ, 788,

    2014

  28. [115]

    R., Kauffmann, O

    Weaver, J. R., Kauffmann, O. B., Ilbert, O., et al. 2022, ApJS, 258,

    2022

  29. [118]

    J., Adams, N

    Ormerod, K., Conselice, C. J., Adams, N. J., et al. 2024, MNRAS, EPOCHS VI: the size and shape evolution of galaxies since z 8 with JWST Observations, 527, 3, Pacifici, C., Kassin, S. A., Weiner, B. J., et al. 2016, ApJ, 832,

    2024

  30. [129]

    M., Alatalo, K., Blitz, L., et al

    McDermid, R. M., Alatalo, K., Blitz, L., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 448,

    2015

  31. [138]

    2006, MNRAS, 366,

    Cappellari, M., Bacon, R., Bureau, M., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 366,

    2006

  32. [161]

    1986, A&A, 161, 89 Schreiber, C., Glazebrook, K., Nanayakkara, T., et al

    Sandage, A. 1986, A&A, 161, 89 Schreiber, C., Glazebrook, K., Nanayakkara, T., et al. 2018, A&A, 618, A85. Scott, N., Brough, S., Croom, S. M., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 472,

    1986

  33. [189]

    2015, ppcor: An R Package for a Fast Calculation to Semi-partial Corre- lation Coefficients

    Kim, S. 2015, ppcor: An R Package for a Fast Calculation to Semi-partial Corre- lation Coefficients. Communications for statistical applications and methods, 22(6), 665–674. Koleva, M., Prugniel, P., De Rijcke, S., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 417,

    2015

  34. [193]

    G., Barro, G., Rieke, G

    Pérez-González, P. G., Barro, G., Rieke, G. H., et al. 2024, ApJ, 968,

    2024

  35. [221]

    H., Conroy, C., et al

    Kriek, M., Price, S. H., Conroy, C., et al. 2019, ApJ, 880, L31. Kroupa, P. 2001, MNRAS, 322,

    2019

  36. [231]

    & Davies, R

    Kuntschner, H. & Davies, R. L. 1998, MNRAS, The ages and metallicities of early-type galaxies in the Fornax cluster, 295, 2, L29. Laigle, C., McCracken, H. J., Ilbert, O., et al. 2016, ApJS, 224,

    1998

  37. [249]

    A., Brinchmann, J., Bouché, N., et al

    Boogaard, L. A., Brinchmann, J., Bouché, N., et al. 2018, A&A, 619, A27. Boquien, M., Burgarella, D., Roehlly, Y ., et al. 2019, A&A, 622, A103. Brammer, G. B., van Dokkum, P. G., Franx, M., et al. 2012, ApJS, 200,

    2018

  38. [251]

    F., van den Bosch, F

    van der Wel, A., Bell, E. F., van den Bosch, F. C., et al. 2009, ApJ, 698,

    2009

  39. [277]

    M., Pérez, E., Cid Fernandes, R., et al

    González Delgado, R. M., Pérez, E., Cid Fernandes, R., et al. 2017, A&A, 607, A128. Heavens, A., Panter, B., Jimenez, R., et al. 2004, Nature, 428,

    2017

  40. [280]

    G., La Barbera, F., Ferreras, I., et al

    de La Rosa, I. G., La Barbera, F., Ferreras, I., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 418, L74. Emsellem, E., Schinnerer, E., Santoro, F., et al. 2022, A&A, 659, A191. Epinat, B., Tasca, L., Amram, P., et al. 2012, A&A, 539, A92. Epinat, B., Contini, T., Mercier, W., et al. 2024, A&A, 683, A20...

    2011

  41. [289]

    B., Ellis, R

    Belli, S., Newman, A. B., Ellis, R. S., et al. 2014, ApJ, 788, L29. Bellstedt, S., Robotham, A. S. G., Driver, S. P., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 498,

    2014

  42. [307]

    2005, ApJ, 621,

    Thomas, D., Maraston, C., Bender, R., et al. 2005, ApJ, 621,

    2005

  43. [325]

    2003, PASP, 115,

    Chabrier, G. 2003, PASP, 115,

    2003

  44. [363]

    2016, A&A, 592, A19

    Citro, A., Pozzetti, L., Moresco, M., et al. 2016, A&A, 592, A19. Cleveland and Devlin. 1988, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 596-610 Croom, S. M., Lawrence, J. S., Bland-Hawthorn, J., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 421,

    2016

  45. [415]

    J., Brodie, J

    Martín-Navarro, I., Romanowsky, A. J., Brodie, J. P., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 484,

    2019

  46. [427]

    Sersic, J. L. 1968, Cordoba, Argentina: Observatorio Astronomico, 1968 Shankar, F., Marulli, F., Bernardi, M., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 405,

    1968

  47. [547]

    Tinsley, B. M. 1972, A&A, 20, 383 Trager, S. C., Faber, S. M., Worthey, G., et al. 2000, AJ, 119,

    1972

  48. [580]

    2023, A&A, Resolved stel- lar population properties of PHANGS-MUSE galaxies, 673, A147

    Pessa, I., Schinnerer, E., Sanchez-Blazquez, P., et al. 2023, A&A, Resolved stel- lar population properties of PHANGS-MUSE galaxies, 673, A147. Russell, T. A., Dobric, N., Adams, N. J., et al. 2024 Sánchez-Blázquez, P., Peletier, R. F., Jiménez-Vicente, J., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 371,

    2023

  49. [620]

    jie ., Lilly, S

    Peng, Y .-. jie ., Lilly, S. J., Kovaˇc, K., et al. 2010, ApJ, 721,

    2010

  50. [625]

    F., Bundy, K., Hernquist, L., et al

    Hopkins, P. F., Bundy, K., Hernquist, L., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 401,

    2010

  51. [673]

    2010, MNRAS, Environment and self-regulation in galaxy formation, 404, 4,

    Thomas, D., Maraston, C., Schawinski, K., et al. 2010, MNRAS, Environment and self-regulation in galaxy formation, 404, 4,

    2010

  52. [703]

    F., Kennicutt, R

    Sánchez, S. F., Kennicutt, R. C., Gil de Paz, A., et al. 2012, A&A, 538, A8. Salpeter, E. E. 1955, ApJ, 121,

    2012

  53. [716]

    C., Cullen, F., McLure, R

    Carnall, A. C., Cullen, F., McLure, R. J., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 534,

    2024

  54. [763]

    2019, ApJ, 877,

    Chauke, P., van der Wel, A., Pacifici, C., et al. 2019, ApJ, 877,

    2019

  55. [798]

    2023, MNRAS, 526,

    Cappellari, M. 2023, MNRAS, 526,

    2023

  56. [813]

    M., Alatalo, K., et al

    Cappellari, M., McDermid, R. M., Alatalo, K., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 432,

    2013

  57. [872]

    M., Taranu, D

    Croom, S. M., Taranu, D. S., van de Sande, J., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 505,

    2021

  58. [948]

    & Cappellari, M

    Shetty, S. & Cappellari, M. 2015, MNRAS, 454,

    2015

  59. [1062]

    M., Genzel, R., Bouché, N., et al

    Förster Schreiber, N. M., Genzel, R., Bouché, N., et al. 2009, ApJ, 706,

    2009

  60. [1099]

    1988, ApJ, 330, L17

    Iovino, A., Melnick, J., & Shaver, P. 1988, ApJ, 330, L17. Kartaltepe, J. S., Rose, C., Vanderhoof, B. N., et al. 2023, ApJ, 946, L15. Kauffmann, G., Heckman, T. M., White, S. D. M., et al. 2003, MNRAS, 341,

    1988

  61. [1126]

    2011, MNRAS, 413,

    Cappellari, M., Emsellem, E., Krajnovi´c, D., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 413,

    2011

  62. [1145]

    Papovich, C., Dickinson, M., & Ferguson, H. C. 2001, ApJ, 559,

    2001

  63. [1158]

    N., Xue, Y

    Luo, B., Brandt, W. N., Xue, Y . Q., et al. 2017, ApJS, 228, 1,

    2017

  64. [1232]

    G., et al

    van der Wel, A., Franx, M., van Dokkum, P. G., et al. 2014, ApJ, 788,

    2014

  65. [1332]

    E., Whitaker, K

    Skelton, R. E., Whitaker, K. E., Momcheva, I. G., et al. 2014, ApJS, 214,

    2014

  66. [1364]

    2022, ApJ, 938,

    Forrest, B., Wilson, G., Muzzin, A., et al. 2022, ApJ, 938,

    2022

  67. [1643]

    G., Labbé, I., et al

    Kriek, M., van Dokkum, P. G., Labbé, I., et al. 2009, ApJ, 700,

    2009

  68. [1645]

    2019, A&A, 624, A141

    Urrutia, T., Wisotzki, L., Kerutt, J., et al. 2019, A&A, 624, A141. Valdes, F., Gupta, R., Rose, J. A., et al. 2004, ApJS, 152,

    2019

  69. [1694]

    2018, MNRAS, 476,

    Li, H., Mao, S., Cappellari, M., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 476,

    2018

  70. [1729]

    F., McIntosh, D

    Bell, E. F., McIntosh, D. H., Katz, N., et al. 2003, ApJS, 149,

    2003

  71. [1765]

    C., Jian, H.-Y ., et al

    Lin, L., Cooper, M. C., Jian, H.-Y ., et al. 2010, ApJ, 718, 2,

    2010

  72. [1775]

    2019, Astrophysics Source Code Library

    Thomas, R. 2019, Astrophysics Source Code Library. ascl:1904.018 Tinsley, B. M. 1968, ApJ, 151,

    2019

  73. [1784]

    & Emsellem, E

    Cappellari, M. & Emsellem, E. 2004, PASP, 116,

    2004

  74. [1861]

    J., Neri, R., Genzel, R., et al

    Tacconi, L. J., Neri, R., Genzel, R., et al. 2013, ApJ, 768,

    2013

  75. [1862]

    2017, MNRAS, 466,

    Cappellari, M. 2017, MNRAS, 466,

    2017

  76. [2247]

    J., Brammer, G., et al

    de Graaff, A., Setton, D. J., Brammer, G., et al. 2025, Nature Astronomy, E ffi- cient formation of a massive quiescent galaxy at redshift 4.9, 9,

    2025

  77. [2601]

    M., & Gonzalez, J

    Worthey, G., Faber, S. M., & Gonzalez, J. J. 1992, ApJ, 398,

    1992

  78. [2833]

    Searle, L., Sargent, W. L. W., & Bagnuolo, W. G. 1973, ApJ, 179,

    1973

  79. [3071]

    2025, ApJ, 981,

    Nanayakkara, T., Glazebrook, K., Schreiber, C., et al. 2025, ApJ, 981,

    2025

  80. [3273]

    C., McLure, R

    Carnall, A. C., McLure, R. J., Dunlop, J. S., et al. 2023, Nature, A massive qui- escent galaxy at redshift 4.658, 619, 7971,

    2023

  81. [3425]

    P., Brammer, G., et al

    Matthee, J., Naidu, R. P., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, ApJ, 963,

    2024

  82. [3484]

    2022, A&A, 665, A54

    Mercier, W., Epinat, B., Contini, T., et al. 2022, A&A, 665, A54. Morokuma-Matsui, K. & Baba, J. 2015, MNRAS, 454,

    2022

  83. [3792]

    2019, ApJ, 872, L13

    Mowla, L., van der Wel, A., van Dokkum, P., et al. 2019, ApJ, 872, L13. Nanayakkara, T., Glazebrook, K., Kacprzak, G. G., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 468,

    2019

  84. [3828]

    M., Pérez-González, P

    Barro, G., Faber, S. M., Pérez-González, P. G., et al. 2013, ApJ, 765,

    2013

  85. [5581]

    G., Slob, M., Kriek, M., et al

    Beverage, A. G., Slob, M., Kriek, M., et al. 2025, ApJ, 979,

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.