Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 54 references

Excitation of surface plasmon-polaritons through optically-induced ultrafast transient gratings

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Light-written grating launches surface plasmons in under a picosecond

desk verdict A genuinely new all-optical SPP-coupling scheme with a plausible but unvalidated high-density permittivity model; the near-zero reflectance claim should be treated as conditional until the Drude parameters and a parameter scan are provided. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.17314 v2 pith:DQ27UGZI submitted 2024-11-26 physics.optics

Olesia Pashina , Albert Seredin , Giulia Crotti , Giuseppe Della Valle , Andrey Bogdanov , Mihail Petrov , Costantino De Angelis This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics PACS 42.65.Re73.20.Mf
keywords transientgratingsurfaceplasmonpolaritonsultrafastopticalswitchingGaAsthinfilmextendedtwo-temperaturemodelcarrier-inducedpermittivitycriticalcouplingpump-probespectroscopy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes an all-optical way to excite surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) at a GaAs/silver interface without etching any nanostructure. Two crossed femtosecond pump pulses generate an interference pattern that creates free carriers in a thin GaAs film, transiently modulating its refractive index and forming an optical grating that persists for about a picosecond. A weak probe pulse arriving at the right wavelength and angle is phase-matched by this transient grating into an SPP mode, and the model predicts a sharp reflectance dip that can reach near zero at delays around 0.2 ps. The significance is that the switching element is purely optical and self-erasing: the grating disappears as carriers diffuse, so the device could gate plasmonic signals on subpicosecond timescales.

What carries the argument

The central object is the optically induced transient grating: a periodic modulation of the dielectric permittivity of GaAs created by the interference of two crossed pump pulses. It works by supplying the missing wavevector $2\pi/a$ in the phase-matching condition $2\pi/a + k_{pr}\sin\theta_{pr} = k_{SPP}(\omega_{pr})$, and its picosecond lifetime is governed by carrier diffusion rather than recombination.

What would settle it

Perform a pump-probe reflectance measurement on a 300-nm GaAs film on silver using two crossed 500-nm pump pulses at 1 mJ/cm² and a 1600-nm probe at 21.3° incidence; the central claim is falsified if no reflectance dip approaching zero appears near 0.2 ps delay, or if any dip is much broader or shallower than the predicted roughly 40-fs-wide feature.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that a transient grating photo-induced in an initially uniform GaAs film can take over the role of a fabricated grating and couple free-space light to a surface plasmon polariton at the GaAs/Ag interface. Using a self-consistent extended two-temperature model of carrier generation, thermalization, diffusion, and recombination, the authors predict that at a probe wavelength of 1600 nm and incidence angle near 21.3°, the probe reflectance drops almost to zero within a roughly 40-femtosecond window centered around 0.2 ps delay. The effect is driven by a pump-induced reduction of the real part of the permittivity from about 11.4 to about 5, dominated by the Drude contribution of the free-carrier plasma, and the critical coupling condition can be tuned by the GaAs film thickness.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the simulations correctly predict that intense pumping cuts GaAs's real permittivity nearly in half (from about 11.4 to about 5) at the probe wavelength; if the carrier-induced change is smaller or more lossy, the near-zero reflectance dip will not occur.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The scheme provides all-optical, reconfigurable SPP excitation with no patterned nanostructure: the grating appears only while the pump pulses are active and erases as carriers diffuse.
  • The predicted near-zero reflectance dip with roughly 40 femtoseconds FWHM at 0.2 ps delay implies subpicosecond switching, potentially enabling terahertz-rate gating of plasmonic signals.
  • At normal probe incidence the grating excites two counter-propagating SPPs that form a standing wave, offering an ultrafast, optically reconfigurable standing-wave field for sensing or manipulation.
  • Because the SPP dispersion shifts as the carrier distribution diffuses, the probe wavelength and angle can track the moving phase-matching condition over the 0.1-1 ps window, giving angle- and wavelength-agile plasmon launching.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The mechanism should transfer to other semiconductor/metal interfaces (silicon, germanium) if the pump wavelength is tuned above the band gap; this generality is not explored in the paper.
  • Since the grating lifetime is set by ambipolar carrier diffusion, choosing a semiconductor with lower diffusivity or a more strongly confined pump pattern could extend the switching window beyond one picosecond, a testable design lever.
  • A two-pump, one-probe reflectance experiment on a 300-nm GaAs film would directly test the claim: a near-zero dip at 0.2 ps delay would confirm the critical coupling, while a weak or absent dip would indicate that the carrier-induced permittivity change is smaller or lossier than modeled.
  • The critical-coupling condition effectively turns the structure into a transient perfect absorber at the probe wavelength, so the scheme could double as an ultrafast optical limiter or saturable absorber, though the paper does not mention these applications.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a scheme for all-optical ultrafast generation of surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) by using a transient refractive-index grating photo-induced in a GaAs thin film on a silver substrate. The grating is formed by the interference of two femtosecond pump pulses, and the permittivity modulation is modeled with an extended two-temperature model for carrier dynamics, including Drude and band-filling contributions. The authors compute the probe reflectance and report a narrow temporal window near 0.2 ps where the reflectance drops to nearly zero at a specific angle and wavelength, which they attribute to grating-coupled SPP excitation. The central quantitative claims are that the real part of the GaAs permittivity at 1600 nm is reduced by 4–6 units and that critical coupling can be achieved by tuning the film thickness. The paper is purely theoretical and relies on numerical simulations implemented in COMSOL.

Significance. If the predictions hold, the scheme would provide a nanostructure-free, all-optical method for ultrafast SPP generation and switching on a sub-picosecond timescale, extending prior work on transient gratings in metals to semiconductor films. The theoretical framework is ambitious and the numerical implementation is nontrivial, representing a useful step toward reconfigurable ultrafast plasmonic devices. However, the paper currently lacks the quantitative validation and parameter documentation needed to support the near-zero reflectance claim, so the significance of the result is conditional on resolving the concerns below.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III, Eq. (2) and Fig. 2(d)-(e)] The Drude parameters used to compute the permittivity change are not specified. Using the reported peak carrier density (10^21 cm^-3) and the standard GaAs electron effective mass (m* = 0.067 m_e), the plasma frequency gives ΔRe ε ≈ -ω_p^2/ω^2 ≈ -34 at λ = 1600 nm, far larger than the reported reduction of 4–6 units. The paper should state the carrier density, effective mass, and damping that enter the dielectric model, and clarify whether the permittivity change is evaluated using the thermalized carrier density (which appears to be around 10^20 cm^-3) rather than the peak non-thermalized value. This is load-bearing because the SPP dispersion and the phase-matching condition (Eq. (3)) depend directly on ε(t).
  2. [Section IV, near-zero reflectance claim] The statement "nearly total reduction in reflectance was achieved by adjusting the film thickness of the GaAs film h" is not accompanied by the specific value of h, a parameter scan, or a tolerance analysis. Without this information, the near-zero reflectance in Fig. 4(c) cannot be distinguished from a finely tuned or accidental condition. Please provide the thickness sweep and the resulting reflectance dip depth as a function of h, as well as a sensitivity analysis with respect to pump intensity, probe angle, and probe wavelength.
  3. [Section III, dielectric model validity] The text states that "the impact of the band filling effect is zero for the probe wavelength of 1600 nm," but Fig. 2(d) shows a nonzero band-filling contribution to Re Δε, which is an internal inconsistency. Moreover, the model neglects band-gap renormalization and any density-dependent effective mass or scattering-rate corrections at carrier densities up to 10^21 cm^-3; such many-body effects are known to be significant in this regime and could substantially alter the predicted permittivity modulation, thereby shifting the SPP dispersion and the critical-coupling condition. The authors should justify these omissions or assess their quantitative impact.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Fig. 2] The axes of panels (d) and (e) lack labels and units; the magnitude of the permittivity modulation is difficult to read from the figure as printed.
  2. [Table I] The characteristic times are stated for electron temperatures Te = 300–10^4 K, but the simulation reaches temperatures of 8–9 × 10^4 K; please clarify the applicable range of the tabulated parameters.
  3. [Sec. II] There is a typographical error in the sentence "as shown in see Fig. 1" which should be corrected.
  4. [Sec. IV, Fig. 4] The label "q_pr" in Fig. 4(c) should presumably be "θ_pr"; please correct the notation.
  5. [Eq. (3) and Fig. 4(a)] The SPP dispersion relation used to draw the dashed line in Fig. 4(a) is not defined; please specify whether it corresponds to the single-interface SPP or to the mode of the full air/GaAs/Ag multilayer, and how the finite film thickness modifies k_SPP.
  6. [Sec. IV] The probe pulse duration and intensity are not specified; since the reflectance dip in Fig. 4(c) has a 40-fs FWHM, the paper should discuss how a realistic finite-bandwidth probe pulse would affect the observed reflectance dynamics.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the SPP reflectance dip is an emergent full-wave result, and the phase-matching condition is a standard design constraint.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. It (i) solves an extended two-temperature model for carrier densities and temperatures using standard GaAs parameters, (ii) converts those to a spatiotemporal permittivity via Drude and band-filling terms, and (iii) feeds the resulting periodic permittivity into COMSOL Maxwell simulations to compute probe reflectance. The phase-matching condition Eq. (3) is a standard grating-coupling constraint used to identify the expected SPP location on the reflectance map, not an input that forces the reflectance dip; the dip's existence and depth emerge from the full-wave solution. The only tunable element is the film thickness h, which the paper explicitly states is adjusted to reach critical coupling; this is disclosed design optimization rather than a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. Self-citations (e.g., to prior ultrafast-metasurface work by the same groups) are contextual and are not load-bearing for the central eTT/Drude/Maxwell derivation. Consequently, no circular step can be quoted from the manuscript.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central predictions rely on a chain of literature material parameters and two hand-tuned geometrical parameters (film thickness and grating period). No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • GaAs film thickness h = 300 nm
    Adjusted to reach critical coupling and near-zero reflectance; no scan or robustness analysis is shown (Section IV).
  • Grating period a (pump interference period) = 1100 nm
    Set by pump angle ±13 degrees and chosen so Equation (3) can phase-match SPPs at the probe wavelength (Section III).
  • Probe operating point (lambda_pr, theta_pr) = 1600 nm, 21.3 degrees
    Chosen to sit on the SPP dispersion dip (point A in Fig. 4); other points exist, but this one is used for the headline near-zero reflectance result.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption GaAs material coefficients (heat capacities, conductivities, mobilities, recombination rates) from Refs. [40-47] remain valid at carrier densities up to 10^21 cm^-3 and temperatures up to 10^5 K.
    The extended two-temperature system in Equation (1) uses these coefficients as inputs without high-density corrections.
  • domain assumption Permittivity varies slowly enough to solve stationary Maxwell equations at each time step.
    Stated in Section II; this ignores self-consistent feedback between the optical field and carrier dynamics for femtosecond pulses.
  • domain assumption Ambipolar diffusion allows an electron-only description of carrier transport.
    Invoked in Section II via the Dember effect; holes are assumed to follow electrons.
  • domain assumption Drude and band-filling models capture the full permittivity change at 1600 nm, including no band-gap renormalization.
    Section III and Equation (2); the large predicted Re(epsilon) drop of 4-6 units relies on this assumption without high-density corrections.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Excitation of surface plasmon-polaritons through optically-induced ultrafast transient gratings." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DQ27UGZI

@misc{pith2026241117314,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Excitation of surface plasmon-polaritons through optically-induced ultrafast transient gratings},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DQ27UGZI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.17314}
}
read the original abstract

Ultrafast excitation of non-equilibrium carriers under intense pulses offer unique opportunities for controlling optical properties of semiconductor materials. In this work, we propose a scheme for ultrafast generation of surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) via a transient metagrating formed under two interfering optical pump pulses in the semiconductor GaAs thin film. The grating can be formed due to modulation of the refractive index associated with the non-equilibrium carriers generation. The formed temporal grating structure enables generation of SPP waves at GaAs/Ag interface via weak probe pulse excitation. We propose a theoretical model describing non-equilibrium carriers formation and diffusion and their contribution to permittivity modulation via Drude and band-filling mechanisms. We predict that by tuning the parameters of the pump and probe one can reach critical coupling regime and achieve efficient generation of SPP at the times scales of 0.1-1 ps.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.17314 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Illustration of optically induced transient grating [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The distribution of thermalized and non-thermalized [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Interference of two pump beams forming a lat [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Reflectance map for the probe irradiation as a function of probe wavelength [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Optically resonant dielectric nanostructures,

    A. I. Kuznetsov, A. E. Miroshnichenko, M. L. Brongersma, Y. S. Kivshar, and B. Luk’yanchuk, “Optically resonant dielectric nanostructures,” Science, vol. 354, no. 6314, p. aag2472, 2016

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    All-dielectric meta-optics and non-linear nanophotonics,

    Y. Kivshar, “All-dielectric meta-optics and non-linear nanophotonics,” National Science Review , vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 144–158, 2018

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    Subwave- length dielectric resonators for nonlinear nanophotonics,

    K. Koshelev, S. Kruk, E. Melik-Gaykazyan, J.-H. Choi, A. Bogdanov, H.-G. Park, and Y. Kivshar, “Subwave- length dielectric resonators for nonlinear nanophotonics,” Science, vol. 367, no. 6475, pp. 288–292, 2020

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Multipolar nonlinear nanophotonics,

    D. Smirnova and Y. S. Kivshar, “Multipolar nonlinear nanophotonics,” Optica, vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 1241–1255, 2016

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    Nonlinear dielectric nanoantennas and metasurfaces: frequency conversion and wavefront con- trol,

    G. Grinblat, “Nonlinear dielectric nanoantennas and metasurfaces: frequency conversion and wavefront con- trol,” ACS Photonics, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 3406–3432, 2021

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Ultrafast, all opti- cally reconfigurable, nonlinear nanoantenna,

    E. A. A. Pogna, M. Celebrano, A. Mazzanti, L. Ghi- rardini, L. Carletti, G. Marino, A. Schirato, D. Viola, P. Laporta, C. De Angelis, et al. , “Ultrafast, all opti- cally reconfigurable, nonlinear nanoantenna,” ACS nano, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 11150–11157, 2021

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Tuning of mag- netic optical response in a dielectric nanoparticle by ul- trafast photoexcitation of dense electron–hole plasma,

    S. Makarov, S. Kudryashov, I. Mukhin, A. Mozharov, V. Milichko, A. Krasnok, and P. Belov, “Tuning of mag- netic optical response in a dielectric nanoparticle by ul- trafast photoexcitation of dense electron–hole plasma,” Nano letters , vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 6187–6192, 2015

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    Ultrafast all-optical metasurfaces: challenges and new frontiers,

    M. Maiuri, A. Schirato, G. Cerullo, and G. Della Valle, “Ultrafast all-optical metasurfaces: challenges and new frontiers,” ACS Photonics, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 2888–2905, 2024

    work page 2024

Show all 54 references
  1. [9]

    Ultrafast all-optical tuning of direct-gap semiconductor metasurfaces,

    M. R. Shcherbakov, S. Liu, V. V. Zubyuk, A. Vaskin, P. P. Vabishchevich, G. Keeler, T. Pertsch, T. V. Dol- gova, I. Staude, I. Brener, et al. , “Ultrafast all-optical tuning of direct-gap semiconductor metasurfaces,” Na- ture communications, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2017

    2017

  2. [10]

    Observation of ultrafast self- action effects in quasi-bic resonant metasurfaces,

    I. S. Sinev, K. Koshelev, Z. Liu, A. Rudenko, K. Ladutenko, A. Shcherbakov, Z. Sadrieva, M. Bara- nov, T. Itina, J. Liu, et al., “Observation of ultrafast self- action effects in quasi-bic resonant metasurfaces,” Nano Letters, vol. 21, no. 20, pp. 8848–8855, 2021

    2021

  3. [11]

    Ultrafast all-optical switching with magnetic resonances in nonlinear dielectric nanostructures,

    M. R. Shcherbakov, P. P. Vabishchevich, A. S. Shorokhov, K. E. Chong, D.-Y. Choi, I. Staude, A. E. Miroshnichenko, D. N. Neshev, A. A. Fedyanin, and Y. S. Kivshar, “Ultrafast all-optical switching with magnetic resonances in nonlinear dielectric nanostructures,” Nano letters, ...

    2015

  4. [12]

    Advances in nonlinear metasur- faces for imaging, quantum, and sensing applications,

    Z. Zheng, D. Rocco, H. Ren, O. Sergaeva, Y. Zhang, K. B. Whaley, C. Ying, D. de Ceglia, C. De-Angelis, M. Rahmani, et al. , “Advances in nonlinear metasur- faces for imaging, quantum, and sensing applications,” Nanophotonics, vol. 12, no. 23, pp. 4255–4281, 2023

    2023

  5. [13]

    Nonlinear and ultrafast all-dielectric metasurfaces at the center for integrated nanotechnologies,

    S. Gennaro, R. Sarma, and I. Brener, “Nonlinear and ultrafast all-dielectric metasurfaces at the center for integrated nanotechnologies,” Nanotechnology, vol. 33, no. 40, p. 402001, 2022

    2022

  6. [14]

    Ul- trafast q-boosting in semiconductor metasurfaces,

    Z. Yang, M. Liu, D. Smirnova, A. Komar, M. Shcherbakov, T. Pertsch, and D. Neshev, “Ul- trafast q-boosting in semiconductor metasurfaces,” Nanophotonics, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 2173–2182, 2024

    2024

  7. [15]

    Nonlinear anisotropic dielectric 7 metasurfaces for ultrafast nanophotonics,

    G. Della Valle, B. Hopkins, L. Ganzer, T. Stoll, M. Rah- mani, S. Longhi, Y. S. Kivshar, C. De Angelis, D. N. Neshev, and G. Cerullo, “Nonlinear anisotropic dielectric 7 metasurfaces for ultrafast nanophotonics,” ACS Photon- ics, vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 2129–2136, 2017

    2017

  8. [16]

    Ultrafast modulation of a nonlocal semiconductor metasurface under spatially selective op- tical pumping,

    D. A. Shilkin, S. T. Ha, R. Paniagua-Dom ´ ınguez, and A. I. Kuznetsov, “Ultrafast modulation of a nonlocal semiconductor metasurface under spatially selective op- tical pumping,” Nano Letters, 2024

    2024

  9. [17]

    Optical tuning of dielectric nanoantennas for thermo-optically reconfigurable non- linear metasurfaces,

    M. Celebrano, D. Rocco, M. Gandolfi, A. Zilli, F. Rus- coni, A. Tognazzi, A. Mazzanti, L. Ghirardini, E. A. Pogna, L. Carletti, et al. , “Optical tuning of dielectric nanoantennas for thermo-optically reconfigurable non- linear metasurfaces,” Optics Letters , vol. 46, no. 10, ...

    2021

  10. [18]

    Opto-thermally controlled beam steering in nonlinear all-dielectric metastructures,

    D. Rocco, M. Gandolfi, A. Tognazzi, O. Pashina, G. Zo- graf, K. Frizyuk, C. Gigli, G. Leo, S. Makarov, M. Petrov, et al. , “Opto-thermally controlled beam steering in nonlinear all-dielectric metastructures,” Optics Express , vol. 29, no. 23, pp. 37128–37139, 2021

    2021

  11. [19]

    Self-induced thermo- optical effects in silicon and germanium dielectric nanoresonators,

    T. V. Tsoulos and G. Tagliabue, “Self-induced thermo- optical effects in silicon and germanium dielectric nanoresonators,” Nanophotonics, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 3849– 3861, 2020

    2020

  12. [20]

    Reversible thermal tun- ing of all-dielectric metasurfaces,

    M. Rahmani, L. Xu, A. E. Miroshnichenko, A. Ko- mar, R. Camacho-Morales, H. Chen, Y. Z´ arate, S. Kruk, G. Zhang, D. N. Neshev, et al., “Reversible thermal tun- ing of all-dielectric metasurfaces,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 27, no. 31, p. 1700580, 2017

    2017

  13. [21]

    Anapole mediated gi- ant photothermal nonlinearity in nanostructured silicon,

    T. Zhang, Y. Che, K. Chen, J. Xu, Y. Xu, T. Wen, G. Lu, X. Liu, B. Wang, X. Xu, et al. , “Anapole mediated gi- ant photothermal nonlinearity in nanostructured silicon,” Nature communications, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 3027, 2020

    2020

  14. [22]

    Giant photothermal nonlinearity in a single silicon nanostructure,

    Y.-S. Duh, Y. Nagasaki, Y.-L. Tang, P.-H. Wu, H.-Y. Cheng, T.-H. Yen, H.-X. Ding, K. Nishida, I. Hotta, J.-H. Yang, et al., “Giant photothermal nonlinearity in a single silicon nanostructure,” Nature communications, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 4101, 2020

    2020

  15. [23]

    Optical bistability in nanosilicon with record low q-factor,

    K. Nishida, P.-H. Tseng, Y.-C. Chen, P.-H. Wu, C.-Y. Yang, J.-H. Yang, W.-R. Chen, O. Pashina, M. I. Petrov, K.-P. Chen, et al. , “Optical bistability in nanosilicon with record low q-factor,” Nano Letters, vol. 23, no. 24, pp. 11727–11733, 2023

    2023

  16. [24]

    All-dielectric thermonanophotonics,

    G. P. Zograf, M. I. Petrov, S. V. Makarov, and Y. S. Kivshar, “All-dielectric thermonanophotonics,” Ad- vances in Optics and Photonics , vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 643– 702, 2021

    2021

  17. [25]

    Nonlinear optical heating of all- dielectric super-cavity: efficient light-to-heat conversion through giant thermorefractive bistability,

    D. Ryabov, O. Pashina, G. Zograf, S. Makarov, and M. Petrov, “Nonlinear optical heating of all- dielectric super-cavity: efficient light-to-heat conversion through giant thermorefractive bistability,”Nanophoton- ics, vol. 11, no. 17, pp. 3981–3991, 2022

    2022

  18. [26]

    Ultrafast all-optical bista- bility in algaas photonic crystals,

    C. Husko and C. W. Wong, “Ultrafast all-optical bista- bility in algaas photonic crystals,” in Nanophotonics for Communication: Materials, Devices, and Systems III , vol. 6393, pp. 111–117, SPIE, 2006

    2006

  19. [27]

    Broadband optical ul- trafast reflectivity of si, ge and gaas,

    A. Di Cicco, G. Polzoni, R. Gunnella, A. Trapananti, M. Minicucci, S. Rezvani, D. Catone, L. Di Mario, J. Pelli Cresi, S. Turchini, et al. , “Broadband optical ul- trafast reflectivity of si, ge and gaas,” Scientific Reports, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 17363, 2020

    2020

  20. [28]

    Giant ultrafast dichroism and birefringence with active nonlocal meta- surfaces,

    G. Crotti, M. Akturk, A. Schirato, V. Vinel, A. A. Tri- fonov, I. C. Buchvarov, D. N. Neshev, R. Proietti Zac- caria, P. Laporta, A. Lema ˆ ıtre,et al. , “Giant ultrafast dichroism and birefringence with active nonlocal meta- surfaces,” Light: Science & Applications , vol. 13,...

    2024

  21. [29]

    Giant photoin- duced reflectivity modulation of nonlocal resonances in silicon metasurfaces,

    A. Tognazzi, P. Franceschini, O. Sergaeva, L. Carletti, I. Alessandri, G. Finco, O. Takayama, R. Malureanu, A. V. Lavrinenko, A. C. Cino, et al. , “Giant photoin- duced reflectivity modulation of nonlocal resonances in silicon metasurfaces,” Advanced Photonics, vol. 5, no. 6, ...

    2023

  22. [30]

    Nonlinear fano-resonant dielectric metasurfaces,

    Y. Yang, W. Wang, A. Boulesbaa, I. I. Kravchenko, D. P. Briggs, A. Puretzky, D. Geohegan, and J. Valentine, “Nonlinear fano-resonant dielectric metasurfaces,” Nano letters, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 7388–7393, 2015

    2015

  23. [31]

    Giant ultrafast all-optical modulation based on exceptional points in exciton–polariton perovskite metasurfaces,

    M. A. Masharin, T. Oskolkova, F. Isik, H. Volkan Demir, A. K. Samusev, and S. V. Makarov, “Giant ultrafast all-optical modulation based on exceptional points in exciton–polariton perovskite metasurfaces,” ACS nano , vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 3447–3455, 2024

    2024

  24. [32]

    Emergent resonances in a thin film tai- lored by optically-induced small permittivity asymme- tries,

    R. Bert´ e, T. Possmayer, A. Tittl, L. d. S. Menezes, and S. A. Maier, “Emergent resonances in a thin film tai- lored by optically-induced small permittivity asymme- tries,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.05730 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  25. [33]

    All-dielectric resonant meta-optics lightens up,

    I. Staude, T. Pertsch, and Y. S. Kivshar, “All-dielectric resonant meta-optics lightens up,” Acs Photonics, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 802–814, 2019

    2019

  26. [34]

    Ultrafast dynamics of opti- cally induced heat gratings in metals,

    Y. Sivan and M. Spector, “Ultrafast dynamics of opti- cally induced heat gratings in metals,” ACS Photonics , vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 1271–1279, 2020

    2020

  27. [35]

    Transient optical symmetry breaking for ultrafast broadband dichroism in plasmonic metasurfaces,

    A. Schirato, M. Maiuri, A. Toma, S. Fugattini, R. Proi- etti Zaccaria, P. Laporta, P. Nordlander, G. Cerullo, A. Alabastri, and G. Della Valle, “Transient optical symmetry breaking for ultrafast broadband dichroism in plasmonic metasurfaces,” Nature Photonics , vol. 14, p. 723...

    2020

  28. [36]

    Hot carrier spatio-temporal in- homogeneities in ultrafast nanophotonics,

    A. Schirato, G. Crotti, R. Proietti Zaccaria, A. Alabas- tri, and G. Della Valle, “Hot carrier spatio-temporal in- homogeneities in ultrafast nanophotonics,” New Journal of Physics , vol. 24, p. 045001, Apr. 2022

    2022

  29. [37]

    Experimental Demonstration of Surface Plasmon Polaritons Reflection and Transmis- sion Effects,

    L. Zheng, U. Zywietz, A. Evlyukhin, B. Roth, L. Over- meyer, and C. Reinhardt, “Experimental Demonstration of Surface Plasmon Polaritons Reflection and Transmis- sion Effects,” Sensors, vol. 19, p. 4633, Oct. 2019

    2019

  30. [38]

    “hot” electrons in metal- lic nanostructures—non-thermal carriers or heating?,

    Y. Dubi and Y. Sivan, ““hot” electrons in metal- lic nanostructures—non-thermal carriers or heating?,” Light: Science & Applications , vol. 8, no. 1, p. 89, 2019

    2019

  31. [39]

    Dynamical obser- vation of photo-dember effect on semi-insulating gaas us- ing femtosecond core-level photoelectron spectroscopy,

    K. Oguri, T. Tsunoi, K. Kato, H. Nakano, T. Nishikawa, K. Tateno, T. Sogawa, and H. Gotoh, “Dynamical obser- vation of photo-dember effect on semi-insulating gaas us- ing femtosecond core-level photoelectron spectroscopy,” Applied Physics Express , vol. 8, no. 2, p. 022401, 2015

    2015

  32. [40]

    Schumann, “Properties of Gallium Arsenide

    B. Schumann, “Properties of Gallium Arsenide. EMIS Datareviews Series no. 2, second edition. INSPEC, The Institute of Electric Engineering, London and New York 1990, 790 + XXIV Seiten, zahlreiche Tabellen und Liter- aturangaben, Sachwortverzeichnis, ISBN 0-85296-485-4,” Cryst....

    1990

  33. [41]

    Application of a two-temperature model for the investi- gation of the periodic structure formation on Si surface in femtosecond laser interaction,

    T. J.-Y. Derrien, T. Sarnet, M. Sentis, and T. E. Itina, “Application of a two-temperature model for the investi- gation of the periodic structure formation on Si surface in femtosecond laser interaction,” J. Optoelectron. Adv. Mater., vol. 12, pp. 610–615, oct 2011

    2011

  34. [42]

    Physical properties of Gallium Arsenide (GaAs),

    ioffe.ru GaAs, “Physical properties of Gallium Arsenide (GaAs),” July 2001. [Online; accessed 18. Nov. 2022]

    2001

  35. [43]

    Electron-hole scattering in GaAs quantum wells,

    R. A. H¨ opfel, J. Shah, P. A. Wolff, and A. C. Gossard, “Electron-hole scattering in GaAs quantum wells,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 37, pp. 6941–6954, apr 1988. 8

    1988

  36. [44]

    Ultrafast Dynamics of Opti- cally Induced Heat Gratings in Metals,

    Y. Sivan and M. Spector, “Ultrafast Dynamics of Opti- cally Induced Heat Gratings in Metals,” ACS Photonics, vol. 7, pp. 1271–1279, May 2020

    2020

  37. [45]

    Ultrafast dynamics and subwavelength peri- odic structure formation following irradiation of GaAs with femtosecond laser pulses,

    A. Margiolakis, G. D. Tsibidis, K. M. Dani, and G. P. Tsironis, “Ultrafast dynamics and subwavelength peri- odic structure formation following irradiation of GaAs with femtosecond laser pulses,” Phys. Rev. B , vol. 98, p. 224103, Dec. 2018

    2018

  38. [46]

    Ambipolar diffusion of photoexcited carriers in bulk GaAs,

    B. A. Ruzicka, L. K. Werake, H. Samassekou, and H. Zhao, “Ambipolar diffusion of photoexcited carriers in bulk GaAs,” Appl. Phys. Lett. , vol. 97, Dec. 2010

    2010

  39. [47]

    Auger recom- bination in intrinsic GaAs,

    U. Strauss, W. W. R¨ uhle, and K. K¨ ohler, “Auger recom- bination in intrinsic GaAs,” Appl. Phys. Lett. , vol. 62, pp. 55–57, Jan. 1993

    1993

  40. [48]

    Tracking ultra- fast hot-electron diffusion in space and time by ultrafast thermomodulation microscopy,

    A. Block, M. Liebel, R. Yu, M. Spector, Y. Sivan, F. Garc ´ ıa de Abajo, and N. F. van Hulst, “Tracking ultra- fast hot-electron diffusion in space and time by ultrafast thermomodulation microscopy,” Science advances, vol. 5, no. 5, p. eaav8965, 2019

    2019

  41. [49]

    Generation of dense electron-hole plasmas in silicon,

    K. Sokolowski-Tinten and D. von der Linde, “Generation of dense electron-hole plasmas in silicon,” Phys. Rev. B , vol. 61, pp. 2643–2650, Jan. 2000

    2000

  42. [50]

    Carrier-induced change in refractive index of InP, GaAs and InGaAsP,

    B. Bennett, R. Soref, and J. Alamo, “Carrier-induced change in refractive index of InP, GaAs and InGaAsP,” Quantum Electronics, IEEE Journal of , vol. 26, pp. 113– 122, Feb. 1990

    1990

  43. [51]

    Refractive indices of MBE-grown Al x Ga (1- x ) As ternary alloys in the transparent wavelength region,

    K. Papatryfonos, T. Angelova, A. Brimont, B. Reid, S. Guldin, P. Smith, M. Tang, K. Li, A. Seeds, H. Liu, and D. Selviah, “Refractive indices of MBE-grown Al x Ga (1- x ) As ternary alloys in the transparent wavelength region,” AIP Adv., vol. 11, p. 025327, Feb. 2021

    2021

  44. [52]

    Laser- induced band-gap collapse in gaas,

    E. Glezer, Y. Siegal, L. Huang, and E. Mazur, “Laser- induced band-gap collapse in gaas,” Physical Review B , vol. 51, no. 11, p. 6959, 1995

    1995

  45. [53]

    Ripples and grain formation in gaas surfaces exposed to ultrashort laser pulses,

    A. P. Singh, A. Kapoor, and K. Tripathi, “Ripples and grain formation in gaas surfaces exposed to ultrashort laser pulses,” Optics & Laser Technology , vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 533–540, 2002

    2002

  46. [54]

    Fiber Optic Surface Plasmon Resonance- Based Biosensor Technique: Fabrication, Advancement, and Application,

    G. Liang, Z. Luo, K. Liu, Y. Wang, D. Jianxiong, and Y. Duan, “Fiber Optic Surface Plasmon Resonance- Based Biosensor Technique: Fabrication, Advancement, and Application,” Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. , vol. 46, p. 00, Nov. 2015

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.