Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 150 references

Towards Unbreaking the Universe: MINERVA Measurements of Color Gradients in Massive Quiescent Galaxies Can Help Ease Too-Early Star Formation Tensions

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Ultra-massive quiescent galaxies at z>3 have redder cores and bluer outskirts, and when those color gradients are read as age gradients, the galaxies' 'too-early' assembly histories fall in line with extreme-value statistics until z~10-11.

desk verdict Useful, honest color-gradient measurements whose headline EVS tension-easing is a clearly labeled limiting case—sends cleanly to peer review, but the claim should not outrun the conditional. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.02698 v2 pith:DQV7XLNH submitted 2026-06-01 astro-ph.GA

Sam E. Cutler , Luke Robbins , Danilo Marchesini , Katherine A. Suess , Adam Muzzin , Gabriel Brammer , Yoshihisa Asada , Nicholas S. Martis
show 36 more authors
Stacey Alberts Jacqueline Antwi-Danso Aidan P. Cloonan Ivo Labbé Tim B. Miller Ikki Mitsuhashi Alexandra Pope Anna Sajina Ghassan T. E. Sarrouh Monu Sharma Mauro Stefanon Edgar P. Vidal Chris J. Willot Rachel Bezanson Maruša Bradač Olivia R. Cooper Robert Feldmann Ben Forrest Karl Glazebrook Jenny E. Greene Valentina La Torre Jamie Lin Michael V. Maseda Ian McConachie Themiya Nananyakkara Gaël Noirot Richard Pan Kesha A. Patel Veronica Pratt Marcin Sawicki David J. Setton John R. Weaver Arjen van der Wel Katherine E. Whitaker Yunchong Zhang Kumail Zaidi
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords galaxyevolutionquiescentgalaxieshigh-redshiftcolorgradientsresolvedstellarpopulationsJWSTphotometrystarformationhistoriesextremevaluestatistics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper is trying to establish that the 'universe-breaking' tension—massive, ancient, quiescent galaxies already in place within the first two billion years—may be partly a measurement artifact. It uses JWST medium-band imaging to measure colors in seven elliptical annuli of four z>3 ultra-massive quiescent galaxies, and finds that three of four have negative color gradients (redder centers, bluer outsides). In the limiting case where these gradients are caused entirely by stellar age, the galaxies' cumulative stellar mass assembly histories exceed the 3σ expectation from extreme-value statistics only at z≳10–11 instead of z≳8, and one galaxy stays within 2σ at all redshifts. The paper also shows that slit-based spectroscopy, which captures only the central cores, can overestimate stellar mass (by 0.1 dex for the strongest gradient) and mass-weighted age. The result matters because it offers a mundane alternative to exotic cosmology: check the whole galaxy before declaring the universe broken.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing apparatus is spatially resolved photometry: seven elliptical annuli (0.1'' wide) measured in 16–24 NIRCam filters, including MINERVA medium bands that bracket the Balmer/4000 Å break. Rest-frame colors are derived by SED interpolation, and stellar populations are fit with Bayesian SED modeling using non-parametric star-formation histories. Crucially, the fiducial fit imposes narrow priors on dust attenuation and stellar metallicity (anchored to global fits that include MIRI photometry), so any color gradient is forced to express itself as a mass-weighted age gradient. The comparison metric is extreme-value statistics: the predicted maximum stellar mass of the most massive ga

What would settle it

Take JWST/NIRSpec IFU spectra of the galaxy with the strongest gradient (the −0.126 mag/kpc object at z≈4) and map the 4000 Å/Balmer break strengths, stellar metallicities, and dust attenuation as functions of radius. If the bluer outskirts are produced by lower metallicity or lower dust rather than younger ages, the inferred age gradient vanishes and the assembly histories would again exceed the EVS 3σ limit at z≳8. No IFU observation today would directly contradict the existence of the color gradient, but it would settle whether the gradient is age-driven.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Using resolved photometry in elliptical annuli out to ~4 effective radii, the paper measures rest-frame U−V color gradients in four log(M*/M☉)>11 quiescent galaxies at z>3. Three show negative gradients, most steeply −0.126±0.030 mag kpc^-1 in one galaxy. Modeling the resolved SEDs with non-parametric star-formation histories and deliberately flat dust and metallicity gradients, the paper infers negative age gradients in two galaxies, a flat/positive gradient in a possible post-starburst, and finds that the summed assembly histories exceed the 3σ extreme-value-statistics limit only at z≳10–11 rather than z≳8 as in slit-based analysis. The paper's claim is thus that resolved color information

Load-bearing premise

The tension-easing result rests on the deliberate assumption that dust and metallicity are radially flat, so that every measured color gradient is interpreted as an age gradient; if real dust or metallicity gradients contribute instead, the inferred age gradients shrink and the relief from extreme-value-statistics tension weakens or disappears.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Slit-based masses and ages for z>3 quiescent galaxies can be biased: for the strongest gradient, resolved sums give stellar mass 0.1 dex lower than slit-scaled photometry, and mass-weighted age younger by >3σ in one galaxy.
  • Under the maximal age-gradient assumption, the summed assembly histories of all four galaxies fall within the 3σ EVS envelope out to z~9.5 (median histories exceed it only at z≳10–11), lowering the tension with ΛCDM.
  • Modeling choices matter as much as photometry: non-parametric SFHs that forbid star formation before z=20 and rest-near-IR/MIRI coverage systematically shift assembly histories, so tension claims need to specify these choices.
  • The sample includes a galaxy with a young center and old outskirts (a post-starburst candidate), showing that gradients can be positive or negative and fixed apertures cannot capture them.
  • New 'universe-breaking' candidates should be examined for color/age gradients before being compared to extreme-value statistics.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If age gradients of this size are typical at z>3, the cosmic stellar-mass density in quiescent galaxies may be partially overestimated by unresolved surveys; checking a larger sample with the same annulus method would shift high-redshift mass functions downward.
  • IFU spectroscopy of these four galaxies is the direct test: if the U−V gradients turn out to be dust- or metallicity-driven, the EVS tension would return at z≳8, and the paper's resolution would fail; if they are age-driven, the tension weakens further than the paper's conservative case.
  • The central post-starburst in MINERVA-1189865 raises a caution for interpreting 'formation redshift' from single-aperture SFHs: an unresolved spectrum of a galaxy with a young core and old outskirts would read as a different formation epoch than the radially resolved one.
  • The same annulus technique could be applied to the larger samples of massive quiescent galaxies that next-generation wide-field surveys will deliver, providing a cheap screening test before expensive IFU follow-up.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper measures resolved, annulus-by-annulus colors and SEDs of four z>3, log(M*/Msun)>11 quiescent galaxies from Carnall et al. (2024), using MINERVA JWST medium-band imaging plus archival broadband and MIRI data. The authors report negative observed and rest-frame color gradients in three of the four galaxies, with the strongest rest-frame U−V gradient of −0.126 ± 0.030 mag/kpc in MINERVA-1084946. They then fit the annular photometry with EAzY and PROSPECTOR, adopting a fiducial model in which dust and metallicity gradients are fixed by narrow priors, so that color gradients are forced to be age gradients. Under this assumption they find negative age gradients in two galaxies and derive resolved stellar mass assembly histories that show less tension with the Lovell et al. (2022) extreme-value-statistics (EVS) bounds than the original slit-based C24 analysis. The paper explicitly labels this an extreme limiting case and calls for IFU spectroscopy to break the age–dust–metallicity degeneracy.

Significance. The empirical color-gradient measurements are a valuable new dataset: the annular photometry is carefully constructed, with covariances measured from 10,000 empty apertures, PSF-matched point-source checks, and conservative error floors. If the measured negative gradients are confirmed, they show that single-slit spectroscopy can bias global stellar masses and ages for the very galaxies used in 'universe-breaking' claims. The EVS-tension-easing result, however, is conditional on the fiducial priors that force flat dust and metallicity gradients; the paper's own alternative fits show that plausible dust or metallicity gradients would reduce or erase the inferred age gradients. The central scientific contribution is therefore the resolved color information, not the demonstration that the EVS tension is eased. The manuscript is honest about this framing in Section 3.3, but the abstract and title emphasize the tension-easing interpretation, which needs to be more carefully qualified.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.3, Table A1, Fig. 5] The 'lessened tension with EVS' claim is computed only for the fiducial PROSPECTOR model with narrow Gaussian priors on dust2 (σ=0.046) and metallicity (σ≈0.05–0.08), which by construction converts color gradients into age gradients. The paper's own alternative fits in §4.3 find that with a uniform A_V prior PROSPECTOR prefers a moderate age gradient plus a strong dust gradient, and with free metallicity it finds >1 dex metallicity gradients. If either alternative is physical, the inferred age gradients shrink and the EVS relief may disappear, potentially restoring the C24 tension at z≳8. Because the headline result depends on this, the manuscript should quantify the EVS bounds under the alternative (free dust/free metallicity) fits, or explicitly state that no EVS statement can be made outside the maximal-age-gradient assumption. As written, the central claim is not robust to the paper'
  2. [Appendix B, §5.1] The z=20 SFH cutoff is another load-bearing prior for the early-time assembly histories: removing it raises the mass assembly histories at z≳8, which would push the curves back toward or above the EVS 3σ limits. Appendix B shows the Bayes factor is only ~1.5, i.e., weak evidence. Yet the main-text claim 'we find lessened tensions with extreme value statistics models out to z∼9.5' does not include this sensitivity. A robustness figure showing the EVS comparison with zmax=∞ (or with a lower zmax) would be needed to support the general statement; currently the reader cannot tell how much of the tension relief comes from this prior.
  3. [§4.2, Fig. 2] For MINERVA-1092611, the observed F140M−F250M gradient is consistent with flat (−0.054±0.065 mag/kpc globally), yet the EAzY rest-frame U−V gradient is reported as −0.084±0.017 mag/kpc. The explanation that EAzY leverages multiple filters is plausible, but this is a case where the rest-frame color is derived with template fitting rather than a direct filter measurement. Given that this galaxy is one of the two that C24 identified as in strongest EVS tension, the rest-frame gradient (and the resulting age gradient) needs a robustness check, e.g., showing the gradient derived from a direct rest-frame-band interpolation or from an independent template set, before it is used to argue for reduced tension.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract vs §4.2] The abstract and Section 6 quote the strongest rest-frame gradient as −0.126±0.030 mag/kpc, but Section 4.2 reports −0.131±0.018 mag/kpc for the same quantity. Please harmonize the values and specify which measurement (EAzY rest-frame or other) is being quoted.
  2. [§3.1] The text says the annular photometry extends to 0.7'' (~4 R_e), but Section 3.1 states the outermost annulus reaches 3.2–4.4 R_e depending on galaxy. The abstract's ~4 R_e is an approximation; the spread should be acknowledged.
  3. [Figure 2] In the bottom-row UVJ diagrams, the 'slit photometry' open points and the 'super photometry' black-outlined points are difficult to distinguish for some galaxies because of symbol overlap. Consider using distinct marker shapes with a legend for each galaxy.
  4. [§4.3, Table 2] The statement that slit photometry overestimates mass and age for MINERVA-1084946 is supported by Table 2, but for MINERVA-1208449 the annular and slit masses also differ by ~0.05 dex despite the flat color gradient. The text should explicitly note that differences in SED modeling codes/priors, not only gradients, contribute to these offsets.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

Tension-easing claim is a by-construction consequence of the imposed flat dust/metallicity priors; the color-gradient measurements themselves are not circular.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 3.3 (PROSPECTOR: Stellar Population Modeling); Table A1; Figures 3–5]
    "We therefore chose to adopt the extreme “limiting” case of modeling the observed color gradients as a gradient in mass-weighted age by imposing narrow priors on the dust and metallicity parameters (see Table A1). These “fiducial” priors are designed to test whether such maximized age gradients could help resolve the tensions our galaxies’ SFHs pose to theoretical models."

    The fiducial PROSPECTOR model pins dust2 to a truncated Gaussian with σ=0.046 and metallicity to a narrow Gaussian with σ≈0.045–0.075 from C24 for every annulus (Table A1). With dust and metallicity gradients thus forced to be nearly flat, any radial color change in the rest-UV/NIR photometry is necessarily mapped into the mass-weighted age parameter. The “age gradients” in Figures 3–4 are therefore not independent inferences from the photometry but a re-parameterization of the observed color gradients under the imposed priors. The assembly histories and the EVS-tension reduction in Figure 5 inherit this by-construction mapping. The paper is transparent about the assumption, but the headline “lessened tensions” is nonetheless an artifact of the maximal-age prior choice, not a test of that

  2. self definitional [Section 3.3; Appendix A (Fig. A1)]
    "We first constrain the stellar metallicity in each annulus with a narrow Gaussian prior based on the C24 best-fit metallicities and uncertainties... Thus, by construction we implicitly assume no strong metallicity gradients in these galaxies."

    The phrase “by construction” makes explicit that flat dust/metallicity gradients are an input, not a result. The age gradient is defined as the residual after subtracting the assumed-flat dust and metallicity gradients from the observed color gradient. Consequently, the “maximal age gradient” interpretation and the resulting EVS easing are not empirical predictions that could confirm or refute the age-gradient hypothesis; they are the same data viewed through the adopted priors. The paper’s own free-AV and free-metallicity fits confirm the degeneracy (a sharp dust decrease or >1 dex metallicity jumps instead of age gradients), showing that the fiducial age-gradient result is selected by the priors rather than required by the photometry.

full rationale

The empirical measurements of negative rest-frame color gradients are not circular: the photometry, annuli, PSF controls, and EAzY rest-frame colors are independent of the EVS analysis. The circularity enters only when the observed color gradients are converted into age gradients under the fiducial PROSPECTOR model, which imposes narrow Gaussian priors on dust2 and metallicity (Table A1). With dust and metallicity gradients pinned to ~zero by construction, any radial color change must be attributed to age; the resulting “lessened tension” with EVS models (Fig. 5, Sec. 5.1) is therefore a conditional consequence of the “limiting case” assumption, not a discovery that color gradients actually ease the tension. The paper is unusually honest about this, repeatedly labeling the results as a test of “maximal age gradients” and calling for IFU spectroscopy to break the degeneracy. It also shows that some tension reduction survives when AV is left free, and that the z=20 SFH cutoff (Appendix B, Bayes factor ~1.5) independently affects early assembly. For those reasons the circularity is partial (score 5) rather than total: the central empirical content (color gradients and their potential to bias slit-based masses/ages) stands on its own, but the headline “lessened tensions” is substantially constructed by the flat-gradient priors.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The central claim about lessened EVS tension rests on two externally fitted quantities (C24 metallicities and global dust values from the same galaxies' photometry) being imposed as radially flat priors, plus a z=20 SFH cap. These are the main 'free inputs' beyond the data.

free parameters (8)
  • dust2 prior mean (MINERVA-1084946) = 0.101
    Truncated Gaussian prior on dust2 used for all annuli; central value from global super+MIRI fit to the same galaxy (Table A1).
  • dust2 prior mean (MINERVA-1092611) = 0.534
    Truncated Gaussian prior on dust2 used for all annuli; central value from super photometry fit (no MIRI coverage).
  • dust2 prior mean (MINERVA-1189865) = 0.700
    Truncated Gaussian prior on dust2 used for all annuli; central value from global super+MIRI fit to the same galaxy.
  • dust2 prior mean (MINERVA-1208449) = 0.295
    Truncated Gaussian prior on dust2 used for all annuli; central value from global super+MIRI fit to the same galaxy.
  • log(Z/Zsun) prior mean (MINERVA-1084946) = 0.32
    Gaussian prior on stellar metallicity for all annuli, taken from C24 best-fit global metallicity.
  • log(Z/Zsun) prior mean (MINERVA-1092611) = 0.35
    Gaussian prior on stellar metallicity for all annuli, taken from C24 best-fit global metallicity.
  • log(Z/Zsun) prior mean (MINERVA-1189865) = -0.41
    Gaussian prior on stellar metallicity for all annuli, taken from C24 best-fit global metallicity.
  • log(Z/Zsun) prior mean (MINERVA-1208449) = 0.35
    Gaussian prior on stellar metallicity for all annuli, taken from C24 best-fit global metallicity.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math WMAP9 cosmology and Chabrier IMF
    Assumed throughout for distance scale and stellar mass conversion (Section 1).
  • domain assumption FSPS+MIST stellar population models provide a valid continuum basis for z>3 quiescent galaxies
    Used in PROSPECTOR fits; a common assumption in SED fitting but not independently justified here.
  • ad hoc to paper No star formation before z=20 in the fiducial SFH model
    Section 3.3 and Appendix B: imposed to prevent 'hiding' mass at early times; changes SFHs at z>8, but Bayes factor test shows data do not strongly prefer it.
  • ad hoc to paper C24 spectroscopic metallicities are representative of the whole galaxy; no strong metallicity gradients
    Gaussian priors on logZ are applied identically to all annuli (Section 3.3); if real metallicity gradients exist, inferred age gradients change.
  • ad hoc to paper The global dust attenuation from super+MIRI photometry applies radially with negligible gradient
    A narrow truncated Gaussian on dust2 is imposed on all annuli (Table A1, Appendix C); this is the assumption that forces color gradients into age gradients.
  • domain assumption Empty-aperture noise covariance matrix correctly models correlated noise between annuli
    Equation 3 in Section 3.1; errors on the gradient fits depend on this covariance model.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Towards Unbreaking the Universe: MINERVA Measurements of Color Gradients in Massive Quiescent Galaxies Can Help Ease Too-Early Star Formation Tensions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DQV7XLNH

@misc{pith2026260602698,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Towards Unbreaking the Universe: MINERVA Measurements of Color Gradients in Massive Quiescent Galaxies Can Help Ease Too-Early Star Formation Tensions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DQV7XLNH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.02698}
}
abstract

The discovery of a population of massive, ancient quiescent galaxies within the first 2 Gyr of the Universe's history has led to significant tensions with models of galaxy formation. However, these analyses are often based on slit spectroscopy, which typically captures only the center-most region of these galaxies and, crucially, assumes these cores are representative of the entire galaxy. To illustrate the varying stellar populations present throughout these galaxies, we present an analysis of color gradients in four $z>3$, $\log(M_\star/M_\odot)>11$ quiescent galaxies which previous works have argued are in tension with models. Using medium-band photometry from MINERVA JWST observations, we measure resolved photometry in a series of elliptical annuli out to $0.7^{\prime\prime}$ ($\sim4~R_e$). We find negative color gradients in three galaxies, and for the most extreme color gradient ($\Delta(U-V)/\Delta R=-0.126\pm0.030~{\rm mag~kpc^{-1}}$), we find the stellar mass is 0.1 dex lower when compared to photometry measured within NIRSpec slits. In the limiting case where these color gradients are entirely driven by age, we find lessened tensions with extreme value statistics models out to $z\sim9.5$, though different stellar population modeling choices also contribute significantly. Ultimately, these findings highlight the need for integral field unit spectroscopy. Spatially-resolved spectra can provide the evidence needed to break the age-dust-metallicity degeneracy, and reliably separate the effects of the observed color gradients from the effects of different physical modeling assumptions on the formation histories of these galaxies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.02698 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Image cutouts and resolved SEDs of the four ultra-massive quiescent galaxies. For each galaxy, a (F090W+F115W+F150W)-F277W￾F444W RGB image is shown in the top left while the bottom left shows a medium-band-only RGB image. The three medium-band filters for each galaxy, chosen to span the Balmer/4000Å break, are indicated in the top of the cutout. A neighboring galaxy is masked in the broadband RGB cutout of MINERVA-1… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Most of the ultra-massive quiescent galaxies at z > 3 have negative color gradients. Top row: Change in observed colors with aperture semi-major axis (in kpc on the bottom axis and relative to the flux radius on the top) for each galaxy in our sample. The filters, chosen to be closest to the pivot wavelength of the rest-frame U and V bands, are indicated in the bottom left of each panel. Filled points (connected via… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The distribution of galaxy mass-weighted age, specific-star formation rate (averaged over the last 100 Myr of the galaxies’ SFHs), rest-frame V band mass-to-light ratio in the rest-frame Bessel V-band, and dust-corrected (“de-reddened”) D4000 and DB (D4000dr and DB,dr) strengths in each annular aperture for our “fiducial” model, whereby the metallicity is given a strong Gaussian prior set by the values from C24, and… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Resolved, median SFHs from PROSPECTOR for the four C24 ultra-massive quiescent galaxies. Colors indicate the corresponding annulus that was used to measure photometry and are identical to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Stellar mass assembly histories of the four ultra-massive quiescent galaxies based on our fiducial PROSPECTOR model. The sum of the median stellar mass assembly histories (defined as the cumulative sum of the mass of living stars and stellar remnants) for each of the a…

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

150 extracted references · 7 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    J., Vulcani, B., et al

    Acharyya, A., Watson, P. J., Vulcani, B., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.05335, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2508.05335

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.05335 2025

  2. [2]

    E., Leja, J., et al

    Akhshik, M., Whitaker, K. E., Leja, J., et al. 2023, ApJ, 943, 179, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aca677

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aca677 2023

  3. [3]

    2024, ApJ, 976, 224, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7396

    Alberts, S., Lyu, J., Shivaei, I., et al. 2024, ApJ, 976, 224, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7396

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad7396 2024

  4. [4]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.03154, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2512.03154 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T

    Antwi-Danso, J., Muzzin, A., Robbins, L., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.03154, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2512.03154 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f ...

    doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.03154 2025

  5. [5]

    M., Lim, S., D’Eugenio, F., et al

    Baker, W. M., Lim, S., D’Eugenio, F., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 539, 557, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf475

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staf475 2025

  6. [6]

    2016, extinction v0.3.0, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.804967

    Barbary, K. 2016, extinction v0.3.0, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.804967

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.804967 2016

  7. [7]

    2016, JOSS, 1, 58, doi: 10.21105/joss.00058

    Barbary, K. 2016, JOSS, 1, 58, doi: 10.21105/joss.00058

    doi:10.21105/joss.00058 2016

  8. [8]

    F., & de Jong, R

    Bell, E. F., & de Jong, R. S. 2001, ApJ, 550, 212, doi: 10.1086/319728

    doi:10.1086/319728 2001

Show all 150 references
  1. [9]

    B., & Ellis, R

    Belli, S., Newman, A. B., & Ellis, R. S. 2019, ApJ, 874, 17, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab07af

    2019 doi

  2. [10]

    L., et al

    Belli, S., Park, M., Davies, R. L., et al. 2024, Nature, 630, 54, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07412-1

    2024 doi

  3. [11]

    G., Tal, T., et al

    Bezanson, R., van Dokkum, P. G., Tal, T., et al. 2009, ApJ, 697, 1290, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/697/2/1290

    2009 doi

  4. [12]

    2016, A&A, 596, A63, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629080

    Boucaud, A., Bocchio, M., Abergel, A., et al. 2016, A&A, 596, A63, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629080

    2016 doi

  5. [13]

    2025, astropy/photutils: 2.3.0, 2.3.0 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.17129028

    Bradley, L., Sip˝ocz, B., Robitaille, T., et al. 2025, astropy/photutils: 2.3.0, 2.3.0 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.17129028

    2025 doi

  6. [14]

    2023, grizli, v1.9.11 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8370018

    Brammer, G. 2023, grizli, v1.9.11 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8370018

    2023 doi

  7. [15]

    B., van Dokkum, P

    Brammer, G. B., van Dokkum, P. G., & Coppi, P. 2008, ApJ, 686, 1503, doi: 10.1086/591786 Bruzual A., G. 1983, ApJ, 273, 105, doi: 10.1086/161352

    2008 doi

  8. [16]

    C., McLure, R

    Carnall, A. C., McLure, R. J., Dunlop, J. S., & Davé, R. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 4379, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2169

    2018 doi

  9. [17]

    C., McLure, R

    Carnall, A. C., McLure, R. J., Dunlop, J. S., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 490, 417, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2544

    2019 doi

  10. [18]

    C., McLeod, D

    Carnall, A. C., McLeod, D. J., McLure, R. J., et al. 2023a, MNRAS, 520, 3974, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad369

    doi

  11. [19]

    C., McLure, R

    Carnall, A. C., McLure, R. J., Dunlop, J. S., et al. 2023b, Nature, 619, 716, doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06158-6

    doi

  12. [20]

    C., Cullen, F., McLure, R

    Carnall, A. C., Cullen, F., McLure, R. J., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 534, 325, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2092

    2024 doi

  13. [21]

    2003, PASP, 115, 763, doi: 10.1086/376392

    Chabrier, G. 2003, PASP, 115, 763, doi: 10.1086/376392

    2003 doi

  14. [22]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.22239, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.22239

    Chen, L., Wang, T., Sun, H., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.22239, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.22239

    2026 doi arXiv

  15. [23]

    M., Kriek, M., Beverage, A

    Cheng, C. M., Kriek, M., Beverage, A. G., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 532, 3604, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1739

    2024 doi

  16. [24]

    M., Slob, M., Kriek, M., et al

    Cheng, C. M., Slob, M., Kriek, M., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.12316, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.12316

    2025 doi arXiv

  17. [25]

    G., Glazebrook, K., Nanayakkara, T., et al

    Chittenden, H. G., Glazebrook, K., Nanayakkara, T., et al. 2026, MNRAS, 547, stag474, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stag474

    2026 doi

  18. [26]

    2016, ApJ, 823, 102, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/102

    Choi, J., Dotter, A., Conroy, C., et al. 2016, ApJ, 823, 102, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/102

    2016 doi

  19. [27]

    G., Whitaker, K

    Clausen, M., Momcheva, I. G., Whitaker, K. E., et al. 2025, ApJ, 993, 106, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae03aa

    2025 doi

  20. [28]

    Cochrane, R. K. 2025, MNRAS, 544, 1530, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1568

    2025 doi

  21. [29]

    2013, ARA&A, 51, 393, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-141017

    Conroy, C. 2013, ARA&A, 51, 393, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-141017

    2013 doi

  22. [30]

    Conroy, C., & Gunn, J. E. 2010, ApJ, 712, 833, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/712/2/833

    2010 doi

  23. [31]

    E., & White, M

    Conroy, C., Gunn, J. E., & White, M. 2009, ApJ, 699, 486, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/699/1/486

    2009 doi

  24. [32]

    P., Zaritsky, D., et al

    Conroy, C., Naidu, R. P., Zaritsky, D., et al. 2019, ApJ, 887, 237, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5710

    2019 doi

  25. [33]

    Conroy, C., White, M., & Gunn, J. E. 2010, ApJ, 708, 58, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/708/1/58

    2010 doi

  26. [34]

    E., Giavalisco, M., Ji, Z., & Cheng, Y

    Cutler, S. E., Giavalisco, M., Ji, Z., & Cheng, Y . 2023, ApJ, 945, 97, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acb5e9

    2023 doi

  27. [35]

    E., Whitaker, K

    Cutler, S. E., Whitaker, K. E., Weaver, J. R., et al. 2024, ApJL, 967, L23, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad464c de Graaff, A., Setton, D. J., Brammer, G., et al. 2025, Nature Astronomy, 9, 280, doi: 10.1038/s41550-024-02424-3

    2024 doi

  28. [36]

    2014, MNRAS, 438, 1870, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt2331 D’Eugenio, F., van der Wel, A., Wu (柏锋), P.-F., et al

    Dekel, A., & Burkert, A. 2014, MNRAS, 438, 1870, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt2331 D’Eugenio, F., van der Wel, A., Wu (柏锋), P.-F., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 497, 389, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1937 D’Eugenio, F., Pérez-González, P. G., Maiolino, R., et al. 2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 1443, doi...

    2014 doi

  29. [37]

    2016, ApJS, 222, 8, doi: 10.3847/0067-0049/222/1/8

    Dotter, A. 2016, ApJS, 222, 8, doi: 10.3847/0067-0049/222/1/8

    2016 doi

  30. [38]

    S., et al

    Drlica-Wagner, A., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Rykoff, E. S., et al. 2018, ApJS, 235, 33, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aab4f5

    2018 doi

  31. [39]

    J., Li, Q., et al

    Duan, Q., Conselice, C. J., Li, Q., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 540, 774, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf638

    2025 doi

  32. [40]

    S., Abraham, R

    Dunlop, J. S., Abraham, R. G., Ashby, M. L. N., et al. 2021, PRIMER: Public Release IMaging for Extragalactic Research„ JWST Proposal. Cycle 1, ID. #1837

    2021

  33. [41]

    2014, python-fsps: Python bindings to FSPS (v0.1.1), v0.1.1 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.12157

    Foreman-Mackey, D., Sick, J., & Johnson, B. 2014, python-fsps: Python bindings to FSPS (v0.1.1), v0.1.1 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.12157

    2014 doi

  34. [42]

    C., Annunziatella, M., et al

    Forrest, B., Marsan, Z. C., Annunziatella, M., et al. 2020, ApJ, 903, 47, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abb819 Fortuné, S., Remus, R.-S., Kimmig, L. C., Burkert, A., & Dolag, K. 2025, A&A, 704, A185, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554805 COLORGRADIENTS OFULTRA-MASSIVEQUIESCENTGALAXIES21

    2020 doi

  35. [43]

    2017, Nature, 544, 71, doi: 10.1038/nature21680

    Glazebrook, K., Schreiber, C., Labbé, I., et al. 2017, Nature, 544, 71, doi: 10.1038/nature21680

    2017 doi

  36. [44]

    2024, Nature, 628, 277, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07191-9

    Glazebrook, K., Nanayakkara, T., Schreiber, C., et al. 2024, Nature, 628, 277, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07191-9

    2024 doi

  37. [45]

    2012, The DrizzlePac Handbook (Baltimore, MD: STScI)

    Gonzaga, S., Hack, W., Fruchter, A., & Mack, J. 2012, The DrizzlePac Handbook (Baltimore, MD: STScI)

    2012

  38. [46]

    E., Janish, R., Ma, C.-P., et al

    Greene, J. E., Janish, R., Ma, C.-P., et al. 2015, ApJ, 807, 11, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/807/1/11

    2015 doi

  39. [47]

    Adams, J. J. 2012, ApJ, 750, 32, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/750/1/32

    2012 doi

  40. [48]

    A., Kocevski, D

    Grogin, N. A., Kocevski, D. D., Faber, S. M., et al. 2011, ApJS, 197, 35, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/197/2/35

    2011 doi

  41. [49]

    2011, ApJ, 735, 18, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/735/1/18

    Guo, Y ., Giavalisco, M., Cassata, P., et al. 2011, ApJ, 735, 18, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/735/1/18

    2011 doi

  42. [50]

    L., Whitaker, K

    Hamadouche, M. L., Whitaker, K. E., Valentino, F., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.02485, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.02485

    2026 doi

  43. [51]

    2011, MNRAS, 418, L20, doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01134.x

    Harrison, I., & Coles, P. 2011, MNRAS, 418, L20, doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01134.x

    2011

  44. [52]

    J., Adams, N

    Harvey, T., Conselice, C. J., Adams, N. J., et al. 2025, ApJ, 978, 89, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8c29

    2025 doi

  45. [53]

    2013, ApJS, 208, 19, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/19

    Hinshaw, G., Larson, D., Komatsu, E., et al. 2013, ApJS, 208, 19, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/19

    2013 doi

  46. [54]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, CSE, 9, 90, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    2007 doi

  47. [55]

    2005, A&A, 439, 863, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20041961

    Ilbert, O., Tresse, L., Zucca, E., et al. 2005, A&A, 439, 863, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20041961

    2005 doi

  48. [56]

    B., Mobasher, B., et al

    Jafariyazani, M., Newman, A. B., Mobasher, B., et al. 2020, ApJL, 897, L42, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aba11c

    2020 doi

  49. [57]

    K., Carnall, A

    Jespersen, C. K., Carnall, A. C., & Lovell, C. C. 2025, ApJL, 988, L19, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adeb7c

    2025 doi

  50. [58]

    D., Leja, J., Conroy, C., & Speagle, J

    Johnson, B. D., Leja, J., Conroy, C., & Speagle, J. S. 2021, ApJS, 254, 22, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/abef67

    2021 doi

  51. [59]

    2025, ApJL, 978, L39, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ada150

    Ju, M., Wang, X., Jones, T., et al. 2025, ApJL, 978, L39, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ada150

    2025 doi

  52. [60]

    2026, ApJ, 997, 29, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae0a18

    Kawinwanichakij, L., Glazebrook, K., Nanayakkara, T., et al. 2026, ApJ, 997, 29, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae0a18

    2026 doi

  53. [61]

    Kepner, J. V . 1999, ApJ, 520, 59, doi: 10.1086/307419

    1999 doi

  54. [62]

    1999, ApJ, 527, 573, doi: 10.1086/308092

    Kobayashi, C., & Arimoto, N. 1999, ApJ, 527, 573, doi: 10.1086/308092

    1999 doi

  55. [63]

    M., Faber, S

    Koekemoer, A. M., Faber, S. M., Ferguson, H. C., et al. 2011, ApJS, 197, 36, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/197/2/36

    2011 doi

  56. [64]

    2013, ApJL, 775, L16, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/775/1/L16

    Kriek, M., & Conroy, C. 2013, ApJL, 775, L16, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/775/1/L16

    2013 doi

  57. [65]

    G., Price, S

    Kriek, M., Beverage, A. G., Price, S. H., et al. 2024, ApJ, 966, 36, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2df9

    2024 doi

  58. [66]

    Kron, R. G. 1980, ApJS, 43, 305, doi: 10.1086/190669 Labbé, I., Franx, M., Rudnick, G., et al. 2003, AJ, 125, 1107, doi: 10.1086/346140

    1980 doi

  59. [67]

    C., Johnson, B

    Leja, J., Carnall, A. C., Johnson, B. D., Conroy, C., & Speagle, J. S. 2019a, ApJ, 876, 3, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab133c

    doi

  60. [68]

    2019b, ApJL, 880, L9, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab2f8c

    Leja, J., Tacchella, S., & Conroy, C. 2019b, ApJL, 880, L9, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab2f8c

    doi

  61. [69]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.13114, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.13114

    Leung, H.-H., Wild, V ., Papathomas, M., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.13114, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.13114

    2026 doi arXiv

  62. [70]

    2024, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 24, 015009, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/ad0864

    Lin, H., Gong, Y ., Yue, B., & Chen, X. 2024, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 24, 015009, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/ad0864

    2024 doi

  63. [71]

    2019, ApJ, 872, 50, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aafa84

    Lin, L., Hsieh, B.-C., Pan, H.-A., et al. 2019, ApJ, 872, 50, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aafa84

    2019 doi

  64. [72]

    2022, ApJL, 937, L30, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac927f

    Liu, B., & Bromm, V . 2022, ApJL, 937, L30, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac927f

    2022 doi

  65. [73]

    C., Harrison, I., Harikane, Y ., Tacchella, S., & Wilkins, S

    Lovell, C. C., Harrison, I., Harikane, Y ., Tacchella, S., & Wilkins, S. M. 2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 518, 2511, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3224

    2022 doi

  66. [74]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.19942, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2604.19942 M Evans, N

    Lu, S., Daddi, E., Maraston, C., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.19942, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2604.19942 M Evans, N. H., & Peacock, B. 2001, Measurement Science and Technology, 12, 117, doi: 10.1088/0957-0233/12/1/702

    2026 doi arXiv

  67. [75]

    2023, A&A, 672, A71, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202345851

    Maio, U., & Viel, M. 2023, A&A, 672, A71, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202345851

    2023 doi

  68. [76]

    C., Marchesini, D., Brammer, G

    Marsan, Z. C., Marchesini, D., Brammer, G. B., et al. 2015, ApJ, 801, 133, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/801/2/133

    2015 doi

  69. [77]

    2026, A&A, 705, A236, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202555974

    Martorano, M., van der Wel, A., Gebek, A., et al. 2026, A&A, 705, A236, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202555974

    2026 doi

  70. [78]

    V ., et al

    McConachie, I., de Graaff, A., Maseda, M. V ., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.25024, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2510.25024

    2025 doi

  71. [79]

    B., van Dokkum, P., & Mowla, L

    Miller, T. B., van Dokkum, P., & Mowla, L. 2023, ApJ, 945, 155, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acbc74

    2023 doi

  72. [80]

    C., et al

    Mobasher, B., Dahlen, T., Ferguson, H. C., et al. 2015, ApJ, 808, 101, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/808/1/101

    2015 doi

  73. [81]

    A., Marchesini, D., et al

    Muzzin, A., Suess, K. A., Marchesini, D., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.19706, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.19706

    2025 doi arXiv

  74. [82]

    H., & Ostriker, J

    Naab, T., Johansson, P. H., & Ostriker, J. P. 2009, ApJL, 699, L178, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/699/2/L178

    2009 doi

  75. [83]

    2024, Scientific Reports, 14, 3724, doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52585-4

    Nanayakkara, T., Glazebrook, K., Jacobs, C., et al. 2024, Scientific Reports, 14, 3724, doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52585-4

    2024 doi

  76. [84]

    2025, ApJ, 981, 78, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ada6ac

    Nanayakkara, T., Glazebrook, K., Schreiber, C., et al. 2025, ApJ, 981, 78, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ada6ac

    2025 doi

  77. [85]

    J., van Dokkum, P

    Nelson, E. J., van Dokkum, P. G., Förster Schreiber, N. M., et al. 2016, ApJ, 828, 27, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/828/1/27

    2016 doi

  78. [86]

    J., Tadaki, K.-i., Tacconi, L

    Nelson, E. J., Tadaki, K.-i., Tacconi, L. J., et al. 2019, ApJ, 870, 130, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf38a

    2019 doi

  79. [87]

    2024, A&A, 681, A94, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346769

    Nersesian, A., van der Wel, A., Gallazzi, A., et al. 2024, A&A, 681, A94, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346769

    2024 doi

  80. [88]

    R., et al

    Nersesian, A., van der Wel, A., Gallazzi, A. R., et al. 2025, A&A, 695, A86, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452662

    2025 doi

  81. [89]

    B., Ellis, R

    Newman, A. B., Ellis, R. S., Bundy, K., & Treu, T. 2012, ApJ, 746, 162, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/746/2/162 22 CUTLER ET AL

    2012 doi

  82. [90]

    2022, MNRAS, 512, 3566, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac668

    Noirot, G., Sawicki, M., Abraham, R., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 512, 3566, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac668

    2022 doi

  83. [91]

    Oke, J. B. 1974, ApJS, 27, 21, doi: 10.1086/190287

    1974 doi

  84. [92]

    2015, MNRAS, 447, 786, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu2447

    Pacifici, C., da Cunha, E., Charlot, S., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 447, 786, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu2447

    2015 doi

  85. [93]

    2023, ApJL, 953, L4, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acea7a

    Padmanabhan, H., & Loeb, A. 2023, ApJL, 953, L4, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acea7a

    2023 doi

  86. [94]

    Papovich, C., Dickinson, M., & Ferguson, H. C. 2001, ApJ, 559, 620, doi: 10.1086/322412

    2001 doi

  87. [95]

    W., Yang, G., et al

    Papovich, C., Cole, J. W., Yang, G., et al. 2023, ApJL, 949, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acc948

    2023 doi

  88. [96]

    2023, MNRAS, 526, L63, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slad107

    Parashari, P., & Laha, R. 2023, MNRAS, 526, L63, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slad107

    2023 doi

  89. [97]

    2023, ApJ, 953, 119, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acd54a

    Park, M., Belli, S., Conroy, C., et al. 2023, ApJ, 953, 119, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acd54a

    2023 doi

  90. [98]

    2012, MNRAS, 422, 3285, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20848.x

    Pforr, J., Maraston, C., & Tonini, C. 2012, MNRAS, 422, 3285, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20848.x

    2012

  91. [99]

    2019, MNRAS, 490, 3196, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2338

    Pillepich, A., Nelson, D., Springel, V ., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 490, 3196, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2338

    2019 doi

  92. [100]

    J., Groves, B., et al

    Poetrodjojo, H., D’Agostino, J. J., Groves, B., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 487, 79, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1241

    2019 doi

  93. [101]

    M., & Barbaro, G

    Poggianti, B. M., & Barbaro, G. 1997, A&A, 325, 1025, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9703067

    1997 doi arXiv

  94. [102]

    2023, MNRAS, 519, 1526, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3214 Puskás, D., Tacchella, S., Simmonds, C., et al

    Popesso, P., Concas, A., Cresci, G., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 519, 1526, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3214 Puskás, D., Tacchella, S., Simmonds, C., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 540, 2146, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf813

    2023 doi

  95. [103]

    2007, AJ, 134, 1103, doi: 10.1086/520330

    Quadri, R., Marchesini, D., van Dokkum, P., et al. 2007, AJ, 134, 1103, doi: 10.1086/520330

    2007 doi

  96. [104]

    Remus, R.-S., & Kimmig, L. C. 2025, ApJ, 982, 30, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8b4b

    2025 doi

  97. [105]

    2024, ApJ, 976, 193, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad85d3

    Roberts-Borsani, G., Treu, T., Shapley, A., et al. 2024, ApJ, 976, 193, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad85d3

    2024 doi

  98. [106]

    2015, MNRAS, 449, 49, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv264

    Rodriguez-Gomez, V ., Genel, S., V ogelsberger, M., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 449, 49, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv264

    2015 doi

  99. [107]

    2003, ApJ, 599, 847, doi: 10.1086/379628

    Rudnick, G., Rix, H.-W., Franx, M., et al. 2003, ApJ, 599, 847, doi: 10.1086/379628

    2003 doi

  100. [108]

    Salim, S., Boquien, M., & Lee, J. C. 2018, ApJ, 859, 11, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aabf3c

    2018 doi

  101. [109]

    2020, ARA&A, 58, 529, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-032620-021933

    Salim, S., & Narayanan, D. 2020, ARA&A, 58, 529, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-032620-021933

    2020 doi

  102. [110]

    Sarrouh, G. T. E., Asada, Y ., Martis, N. S., et al. 2026, ApJS, 282, 3, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ae1611

    2026 doi

  103. [111]

    F., & Finkbeiner, D

    Schlafly, E. F., & Finkbeiner, D. P. 2011, ApJ, 737, 103, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/103

    2011 doi

  104. [112]

    J., Finkbeiner, D

    Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. 1998, ApJ, 500, 525, doi: 10.1086/305772

    1998 doi

  105. [113]

    2018, A&A, 618, A85, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833070

    Schreiber, C., Glazebrook, K., Nanayakkara, T., et al. 2018, A&A, 618, A85, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833070

    2018 doi

  106. [114]

    J., Bezanson, R., Suess, K

    Setton, D. J., Bezanson, R., Suess, K. A., et al. 2020, ApJ, 905, 79, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abc265

    2020 doi

  107. [115]

    C., Setton, D

    Siegel, J. C., Setton, D. J., Greene, J. E., et al. 2025, ApJ, 985, 125, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adc7b7

    2025 doi

  108. [116]

    E., Whitaker, K

    Skelton, R. E., Whitaker, K. E., Momcheva, I. G., et al. 2014, ApJS, 214, 24, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/214/2/24

    2014 doi

  109. [117]

    G., et al

    Slob, M., Kriek, M., Beverage, A. G., et al. 2024, ApJ, 973, 131, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad65ff

    2024 doi

  110. [118]

    Speagle, J. S. 2020, MNRAS, 493, 3132, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa278

    2020 doi

  111. [119]

    Williams, C. C. 2019, ApJ, 883, 81, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3804

    2019 doi

  112. [120]

    L., Sneppen, A., Clausen, T., et al

    Steinhardt, C. L., Sneppen, A., Clausen, T., et al. 2024, ApJ, 967, 172, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3afb

    2024 doi

  113. [121]

    D., Carnall, A

    Stevenson, S. D., Carnall, A. C., Leung, H.-H., et al. 2026, MNRAS, 545, staf2087, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf2087

    2026 doi

  114. [122]

    A., Kriek, M., Price, S

    Suess, K. A., Kriek, M., Price, S. H., & Barro, G. 2019a, ApJ, 877, 103, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1bda

    doi

  115. [123]

    A., Kriek, M., Price, S

    Suess, K. A., Kriek, M., Price, S. H., & Barro, G. 2019b, ApJL, 885, L22, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab4db3

    doi

  116. [124]

    A., Kriek, M., Price, S

    Suess, K. A., Kriek, M., Price, S. H., & Barro, G. 2020, ApJL, 899, L26, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abacc9

    2020 doi

  117. [125]

    A., Kriek, M., Price, S

    Suess, K. A., Kriek, M., Price, S. H., & Barro, G. 2021, ApJ, 915, 87, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abf1e4

    2021 doi

  118. [126]

    A., Weaver, J

    Suess, K. A., Weaver, J. R., Price, S. H., et al. 2024, ApJ, 976, 101, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad75fe

    2024 doi

  119. [127]

    C., et al

    Sun, G., Faucher-Giguère, C.-A., Hayward, C. C., et al. 2023, ApJL, 955, L35, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acf85a

    2023 doi

  120. [128]

    G., et al

    Szomoru, D., Franx, M., van Dokkum, P. G., et al. 2013, ApJ, 763, 73, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/763/2/73

    2013 doi

  121. [129]

    M., et al

    Tacchella, S., Dekel, A., Carollo, C. M., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 458, 242, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw303

    2016 doi

  122. [130]

    M., Förster Schreiber, N

    Tacchella, S., Carollo, C. M., Förster Schreiber, N. M., et al. 2018, ApJ, 859, 56, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aabf8b

    2018 doi

  123. [131]

    2019, MNRAS, 487, 5416, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1657

    Tacchella, S., Diemer, B., Hernquist, L., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 487, 5416, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1657

    2019 doi

  124. [132]

    M., et al

    Tacchella, S., Conroy, C., Faber, S. M., et al. 2022, ApJ, 926, 134, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac449b

    2022 doi

  125. [133]

    R., Cardone, V

    Tortora, C., Napolitano, N. R., Cardone, V . F., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 407, 144, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16938.x

    2010

  126. [134]

    Trussler, J. A. A., Conselice, C. J., Adams, N., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 537, 3662, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf213

    2025 doi

  127. [135]

    2025, MNRAS, 537, 1826, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf128 Urbano Stawinski, S

    Turner, C., Tacchella, S., D’Eugenio, F., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 537, 1826, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf128 Urbano Stawinski, S. M., Cooper, M. C., Forrest, B., et al. 2024, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, 7, 46, doi: 10.33232/001c.120087 van der Walt, S., Colbert, S. C., & Varoquau...

    2025 doi

  128. [136]

    E., et al

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, Nature Methods, 17, 261, doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

    2020 doi

  129. [137]

    2024a, ApJ, 963, 74, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad187c

    Wang, B., Leja, J., Atek, H., et al. 2024a, ApJ, 963, 74, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad187c

    doi

  130. [138]

    2024b, ApJS, 270, 12, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ad0846

    Wang, B., Leja, J., Labbé, I., et al. 2024b, ApJS, 270, 12, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ad0846

    doi

  131. [139]

    R., Cutler, S

    Weaver, J. R., Cutler, S. E., Pan, R., et al. 2024, ApJS, 270, 7, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ad07e0

    2024 doi

  132. [140]

    E., Kriek, M., van Dokkum, P

    Whitaker, K. E., Kriek, M., van Dokkum, P. G., et al. 2012, ApJ, 745, 179, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/745/2/179

    2012 doi

  133. [141]

    E., Labbé, I., van Dokkum, P

    Whitaker, K. E., Labbé, I., van Dokkum, P. G., et al. 2011, ApJ, 735, 86, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/735/2/86

    2011 doi

  134. [142]

    E., van Dokkum, P

    Whitaker, K. E., van Dokkum, P. G., Brammer, G., et al. 2013, ApJL, 770, L39, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/770/2/L39

    2013 doi

  135. [143]

    E., Ashas, M., Illingworth, G., et al

    Whitaker, K. E., Ashas, M., Illingworth, G., et al. 2019, ApJS, 244, 16, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab3853

    2019 doi

  136. [144]

    M., Lovell, C

    Wilkins, S. M., Lovell, C. C., Irodotou, D., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 7965, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3558

    2024 doi

  137. [145]

    J., Damjanov, I., Sawicki, M., et al

    Williams, D. J., Damjanov, I., Sawicki, M., et al. 2025, ApJ, 989, 107, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ade9a8

    2025 doi

  138. [146]

    J., Quadri, R

    Williams, R. J., Quadri, R. F., Franx, M., van Dokkum, P., & Labbé, I. 2009, ApJ, 691, 1879, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/691/2/1879

    2009 doi

  139. [147]

    A., Elbaz, D., et al

    Xiao, M., Oesch, P. A., Elbaz, D., et al. 2024, Nature, 635, 311, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-08094-5

    2024 doi

  140. [148]

    2017, MNRAS, 466, 3217, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw3308

    Zhang, K., Yan, R., Bundy, K., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 466, 3217, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw3308

    2017 doi

  141. [149]

    J., et al

    Zhang, Y ., de Graaff, A., Setton, D. J., et al. 2026, ApJ, 997, 252, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae24e1

    2026 doi

  142. [150]

    2015, MNRAS, 450, 2327, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv740

    Zolotov, A., Dekel, A., Mandelker, N., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 450, 2327, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv740

    2015 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.