Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 180 references

The competing effects of recent and long-term star formation histories on oxygen, nitrogen, and stellar metallicities

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The fundamental metallicity, nitrogen, and stellar-metallicity relations are one phenomenon: a galaxy's abundance pattern records its star-formation history, with the gravitational potential setting the clock.

desk verdict A credible first census of the FMR/FNR/FMR* family whose key high-Φe contrast rests on a single N/O calibrator and unquantified correlation/dispersion differences. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.07018 v3 pith:DTFGXOSQ submitted 2025-05-11 astro-ph.GA

Nicholas Fraser Boardman , Vivienne Wild , Natalia Vale Asari , Francesco D'Eugenio This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords fundamentalmetallicityrelationnitrogenstellargaseousabundancesstarformationhistorygravitationalpotentialgalaxychemicalevolutionintegralfieldspectroscopy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that the fundamental metallicity relation (FMR, between stellar mass, star-formation rate and gas oxygen abundance), its stellar-metallicity analogue (FMR*, using light-weighted stellar [Z/H]) and the fundamental nitrogen relation (FNR, using gas N/O) are not independent trends but three readings of one link between star-formation history and gravitational potential. Using integral-field spectroscopy of 2,070 nearby star-forming galaxies, with abundances measured at one effective radius, it confirms all three relations and shows how their strength shifts when stellar mass is replaced by $\Phi_e = M_*/R_e$ and SFR by stellar age. The key pattern is that the gas-oxygen relation fades at high masses and potentials, while the nitrogen and stellar-metallicity relations persist or strengthen. The proposed explanation is that deeper potentials go with earlier star-formation histories and faster gas consumption; at low potential, recent gas inflow drives the SFR variations that show up in gas abundances, whereas at high potential, SFR variations reflect long-term differences in star-formation-history shape that are imprinted in stellar metals and nitrogen. If correct, the classic FMR becomes one slice of a unified SFH-potential framework that also explains the $\Phi_e$–abundance relations.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is $\Phi_e = M_*/R_e$, a galaxy's stellar mass divided by its half-light radius, used as a proxy for gravitational-potential depth. Around this, the paper organises three abundance indicators measured at one effective radius—gas oxygen abundance (O/H), gas nitrogen-to-oxygen ratio (N/O) and light-weighted stellar metallicity ([Z/H], effectively iron abundance)—and compares their residual correlations with two star-formation-state parameters: $\Delta$SFR, the offset from the star-forming main sequence, and stellar age $t_e$. The analysis works by binning galaxies in $M_*$ or $\Phi_e$, computing Spearman correlations and dispersions before and after subtracting fitted third-parameter trends, and checking whether each abundance responds to SFR/age at low, intermediate and high potential. This binning is what exposes the different behaviour of the three relations at high $\Phi_e$.

What would settle it

Recompute the same bin-by-bin correlation and dispersion analysis using a different oxygen-abundance calibration, such as direct electron-temperature abundances or an independent strong-line recipe, and check whether the FNR still persists at high $\Phi_e$ while the FMR disappears; if the contrast vanishes, the SFH-potential interpretation loses its observational foundation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a hierarchy among the three abundance–SFR relations that changes with mass and potential. In the lowest-mass bin the classical gas FMR is the strongest of the three; at $\log M_*/M_\odot \sim 10.5$ and at the highest $\Phi_e$ it loses statistical significance, while the FNR and FMR* show their strongest residual trends there. Replacing $M_*$ with $\Phi_e$ tightens the gas relations substantially—$\Phi_e$ alone predicts gas O/H and N/O better than $M_*$ and SFR together—and replacing SFR with the light-weighted stellar age $t_e$ gives similar or stronger residual correlations. The paper reads this as evidence that abundances at 1 $R_e$ carry two separable pieces of information: recent inflow history, which mainly moves gas abundances and dominates in shallow potentials, and long-term star-formation history, which controls nitrogen enrichment and stellar metallicity and dominates in deep potentials. That reading unifies the FMR, FNR, FMR*, the $\Phi_e$-abundance relations, and the observed gas–stellar metallicity offset.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's central contrast depends on the assumption that its adopted recipes for turning measured emission lines into oxygen and nitrogen abundances remain accurate across the whole range of galaxy masses, sizes and star-formation rates.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The gas-only FMR is the weakest of the three relations and disappears at the highest $\Phi_e$, so chemical-evolution models should be benchmarked against the FNR and FMR* as well as, or instead of, the FMR.
  • Because $\Phi_e$ predicts gas O/H and N/O better than $M_*$ and SFR combined, future comparisons between simulations and observations should prioritise reproducing $\Phi_e$-abundance relations.
  • State-of-the-art simulations must first reproduce the observed size–SFR behaviour at fixed mass (including the half-mass-radius version shown here) before their metallicity predictions can be trusted.
  • Replacing SFR with stellar age strengthens the gaseous FMR and FNR, implying that age-based formulations carry more information about the SFH link than SFR-based ones.
  • High-redshift spectroscopic surveys should detect strong redshift evolution in the $\Phi_e$-based relations and in the N/O–O/H distribution, which would confirm or refute the unified interpretation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the unification holds, the reported redshift evolution of the FMR beyond $z\sim2.5$ may be largely a consequence of galaxies being more compact at fixed mass at high redshift, rather than evidence for a separate high-redshift physics.
  • The persistence of the FNR at high $\Phi_e$ suggests N/O could serve as a fossil tracer of early enrichment; a testable extension is whether galaxies at fixed $\Phi_e$ with high N/O also show older stellar populations or stronger metallicity gradients in resolved maps.
  • The framework implies that control samples matched only on mass and redshift are insufficient for abundance studies; matching on size or potential should reduce scatter, though this is an extrapolation from the paper's correlational evidence.
  • An obvious stress test is to recompute the binning analysis with alternative abundance calibrators, since the paper's central contrast depends on two fixed calibration recipes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper uses MaNGA integral-field spectroscopy of 2070 star-forming galaxies to examine the three-way relations between galaxy stellar mass (or the gravitational-potential proxy Phi_e = M*/Re), star-formation rate (or stellar age), and three abundance measures: gas-phase O/H, gas-phase N/O, and stellar metallicity [Z/H]. The authors confirm the fundamental metallicity relation (FMR), the fundamental nitrogen relation (FNR), and the stellar metallicity equivalent (FMR*), as well as their Phi_e-based variants, and find that all relations persist when Phi_e replaces M*. Their central empirical result is that at high masses or high Phi_e, the gaseous FMR weakens or disappears while the FNR persists and the FMR* strengthens. They interpret this contrast as evidence that at low potential, SFR variations are driven by recent gas inflows that mainly affect gas abundances, while at high potential, SFR variations reflect broad differences in star-formation history shapes that become most visible in stellar abundances. The paper also investigates the gas-stellar metallicity offset and shows that it correlates with both SFR and stellar age at fixed mass or potential.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper provides a unified framework for understanding several chemical abundance scaling relations in star-forming galaxies, linking them to a single SFH-potential picture. The use of three independent abundance tracers, the explicit comparison of M* and Phi_e as independent variables, and the checks against alternative SFR measures (Section 2) are genuine strengths, as is the transparent discussion of the tension between simulations and observations regarding size-SFR behavior (Section 4.4). The results would also strengthen the case that Phi_e is a more fundamental driver of gas-phase abundances than M* alone. However, the load-bearing contrast between the behavior of the FMR and the FNR at high Phi_e rests on a single gas-abundance calibrator for each tracer, and the claimed differences in relation strengths are not quantified with statistical uncertainties. These issues temper the certainty of the interpretation, though they are addressable with additional analysis.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 2, Figures 5-6]
  2. [Section 3.3, Figures 5-6]
  3. [Section 3.3, Figure 6]
  4. [Section 4.2, Figures 9-10]
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout]
  2. [Figure 2]
  3. [Section 2]
  4. [Section 3.3]

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the abundance relations are measured residuals, not quantities defined by the fit, and the only overlapping-author citation (Boardman et al. 2024b) is an external, falsifiable prior analysis.

full rationale

The paper's central results are observational correlations between independently measured abundances and a residual SFR parameter ΔSFR. ΔSFR is defined as the offset from a straight-line fit to the star-forming sequence, but no abundance measure is constructed from that fit; the abundance–ΔSFR trends are measured Spearman correlations and dispersion changes after polynomial subtraction, and the polynomial subtraction is used only to characterize scatter, not to generate predicted abundances. The key contrast (FMR disappears at high Φe while FNR persists and FMR* strengthens) is read directly from binned data in Figures 5–6, not from a fitted model whose parameters include the claimed outcome. Measurements rest on external calibrators (Curti et al. 2020; Florido et al. 2022) and public MaNGA data; the single most relevant overlapping-author reference, Boardman et al. (2024b), is a separate published analysis of the same survey and is used for context (e.g., tightness of ΦZR and ΦNR), not as a uniqueness theorem or as an assumption that entails the present results. The calibrator-dependence concern raised by the skeptic is a systematic-error or correctness risk, not a circularity: swapping calibrators would change the data values but would not make any result true by definition. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no abundance ratio is equal to the SFS fit by construction, and no central premise is justified solely by a self-citation. Hence no circular step is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The analysis rests on standard observational proxies (Phi_e for potential, te for SFH shape), the adopted abundance calibrators, and the sample selection. The free parameter is the descriptive SFS fit used to define DeltaSFR, which is central to the residual analysis though not a physical constant.

free parameters (1)
  • Star-forming sequence linear fit coefficients = not reported
    A straight-line fit to the SFS (Section 2, Figure 1) defines DeltaSFR residuals used throughout the analysis. If the sequence is curved, residuals could carry a mass-dependent bias; the paper does not test a higher-order fit.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Phi_e = M*/Re is treated as a proxy for gravitational potential depth.
    This underpins the interpretation of Phi_e-abundance relations in Sections 4.1-4.2. The authors acknowledge the debate ('The idea of a direct potential-metallicity connection has however been challenged', Section 1) but proceed with the proxy.
  • domain assumption The adopted gas abundance calibrators (Curti et al. 2020 RS32 for O/H, Florido et al. 2022 N2O2 for N/O) produce accurate relative abundances across the full M*, Phi_e, and SFR range.
    No alternative calibrators are tested; the dispersion comparisons and mass-dependent trends in Section 3.3 rest on these calibrators' systematics.
  • domain assumption Light-weighted stellar ages te from pipe3d at 1Re trace the relevant star-formation history shape.
    Used as an alternative third parameter to DeltaSFR throughout Sections 3.2-3.4; if te is biased by dust or SSP library assumptions, the age-based relations could be spurious.
  • domain assumption The star-forming classification (BPT, EWHalpha > 14 Angstrom) and the b/a > 0.6 cut do not introduce selection effects that create the apparent Phi_e-dependent trends.
    Sample selection in Section 2; no completeness corrections are applied, and the requirement of reliable gas abundances could bias against low-surface-brightness galaxies.
  • domain assumption Pipe3d stellar [Z/H] is functionally equivalent to [Fe/H].
    Stated in Section 2; the stellar metallicity relation FMR* is interpreted in terms of iron enrichment, which depends on this equivalence.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The competing effects of recent and long-term star formation histories on oxygen, nitrogen, and stellar metallicities." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DTFGXOSQ

@misc{pith2026250507018,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The competing effects of recent and long-term star formation histories on oxygen, nitrogen, and stellar metallicities},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DTFGXOSQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.07018}
}
read the original abstract

The fundamental metallicity relation (FMR) - the three-way trend between galaxy stellar masses, star-formation rates (SFRs) and gaseous metallicities - remains amongst the most studied extragalactic relations. Furthermore, metallicity correlates particularly tightly with gravitational potential. Simulations support a shared origin for these relations relating to long-term gas inflow history variations; however, differences between simulated and observed galaxy samples make it unclear whether this holds for real galaxies. We use MaNGA integral field observations to probe these relations in star-forming galaxies at one effective radius. We confirm the FMR and equivalent relations for stellar metallicity (FMR*) and gaseous N/O (fundamental nitrogen relation, FNR). We find that all relations persist when considering gravitational potential in place of stellar mass and/or considering stellar ages in place of SFR, with the gaseous relations strengthened significantly by considering potential. The gaseous FMR disappears at high masses/potentials, while the FNR persists and the FMR* strengthens. Our results suggest a unified interpretation of galaxies' gaseous and stellar metallicities and their N/O abundances in terms of their formation histories. Deeper gravitational potentials correspond to earlier star-formation histories (SFHs) and faster gas consumption, producing tight potential-abundance relations for stars and gas. In weak potentials, galaxy SFR variations primarily result from recent gas inflows, mostly affecting gas abundances. In deeper potentials, SFR variations instead correspond to broad differences in SFH shapes resulting from differences in long-term gas consumption histories, which is most visible in stellar abundances. This unified interpretation could be confirmed with upcoming higher redshift spectroscopic surveys.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.07018 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Top: star-forming sequence (SFS) for our final star￾forming galaxy sample. The dashed line shows the straight-line fit to the SFS as described in the text. Middle: mass-size plane for our final sample (colored points) and parent sample (grey points), us￾ing half-light radii. Bottom: mass-size plane using half-mass radii. The star-forming galaxy sample is colored by ∆SFR, which indi￾cates the difference between galax… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Light-weighted pipe3d stellar metallicities (top) and stellar ages (bottom) at 1Re, plotted against M∗ (left panels), Φe (middle panels) and Σe (right panels). Each panel displays the corresponding Spearman correlation coefficient (ρ), with P << 0.01 in all cases. We color data points by galaxies’ Re, with error bars showing the median uncertainties. star-forming galaxy sample (Spearman correlation ρ = 0.86, with P … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Mass–SFR–abundance (top row; FMR left, FNR middle, FMR∗ right), potential–SFR–abundance (middle; Φ-FMR left, Φ-FNR middle, Φ-FMR∗ right) and density–SFR–abundance (bottom row) relations. We show relations for gas metallicity (left column), gaseous N/O (middle column) and stellar metallicity (right column), with all abundances measured at 1 half-light radius. The colored lines show medians in bins of M∗ (top),Φe (mid… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Mass–age–abundance (top), potential–age–abundance (middle) and density–age–abundance (bottom) relations for gas metallicity (left), gaseous N/O (middle) and stellar metallicity (right), with all abundances measured at 1 half-light radius. The format is as in [PITH_FUL…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Top: the FMR, FNR and FMR∗. The colored lines show median abundances as a function of ∆SFR, calculated in ten bins of stellar mass each comprising ∼10 % of sample galaxies. We show results for the FMR (left), FNR (middle) FMR∗ (right) in turn. Top middle: equivalent re…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: As in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Gas-stellar metallicity offset [Og/Z∗]e at 1 Re as a function of M∗ (top) and Φe (bottom). The colored lines show medians in bins of M∗ (top) or Φe (bottom) for different ∆SFR ranges. We detect an inverse correlation between [Og/Z∗]e and ∆SFR across almost the full ran…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Top left: gas-stellar metallicity offset [Og/Z∗]e as a function of ∆SFR, in bins of Φe ; line colours are as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Cartoon depiction of two example SFH shapes plotted as SFR vs time (leftmost panel), and their resulting chemical evolution histories in terms of Fe/H (left middle), O/H (right middle), and in terms of their N/O–O/H relations (rightmost panel). We assume the early SFH …
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Cartoon depiction of four more example SFH shapes plotted as SFR vs time (leftmost panels), and their resulting chemical evolution histories in terms of Fe/H (left middle panels), O/H (right middle pabels) and in terms of their N/O–O/H relations (rightmost panels). Al…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

180 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Abdurro'uf et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ac4414 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJS..259...35A 259, 35

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac4414 2022

  2. [2]

    Almaini O., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx1957 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.472.1401A 472, 1401

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1957 2017

  3. [3]

    G., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201117901 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...539A..46A 539, A46

    Alonso S., Mesa V., Padilla N., Lambas D. G., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201117901 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...539A..46A 539, A46

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117901 2012

  4. [4]

    H., Martini P., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/765/2/140 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...765..140A 765, 140

    Andrews B. H., Martini P., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/765/2/140 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...765..140A 765, 140

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/765/2/140 2013

  5. [5]

    J., Allende Prieto C., Kiselman D., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20034328 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004A&A...417..751A 417, 751

    Asplund M., Grevesse N., Sauval A. J., Allende Prieto C., Kiselman D., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20034328 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004A&A...417..751A 417, 751

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20034328 2004

  6. [6]

    J., Scott P., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ARA&A..47..481A 47, 481

    Asplund M., Grevesse N., Sauval A. J., Scott P., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ARA&A..47..481A 47, 481

    arXiv 2009

  7. [7]

    M., Maiolino R., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad802 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.521.4173B 521, 4173

    Baker W. M., Maiolino R., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad802 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.521.4173B 521, 4173

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stad802 2023

  8. [8]

    M., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3594 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.519.1149B 519, 1149

    Baker W. M., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3594 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.519.1149B 519, 1149

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3594 2023

Show all 180 references
  1. [9]

    A., Phillips M

    Baldwin J. A., Phillips M. M., Terlevich R., 1981, @doi [ ] 10.1086/130766 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1981PASP...93....5B 93, 5

    1981 doi

  2. [10]

    M., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaaf6e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...856...64B 856, 64

    Barone T. M., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaaf6e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...856...64B 856, 64

    2018 doi

  3. [11]

    M., D'Eugenio F., Colless M., Scott N., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9951 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...898...62B 898, 62

    Barone T. M., D'Eugenio F., Colless M., Scott N., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9951 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...898...62B 898, 62

    2020 doi

  4. [12]

    K., S \'a nchez S

    Barrera-Ballesteros J. K., S \'a nchez S. F., Heckman T., Blanc G. A., The MaNGA Team 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7aa9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...844...80B 844, 80

    2017 doi

  5. [13]

    K., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9b31 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...852...74B 852, 74

    Barrera-Ballesteros J. K., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9b31 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...852...74B 852, 74

    2018 doi

  6. [14]

    Belfiore F., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ab3e4e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019AJ....158..160B 158, 160

    2019 doi

  7. [15]

    R., Kazin E., Muna D., Weaver B

    Blanton M. R., Kazin E., Muna D., Weaver B. A., Price-Whelan A., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/142/1/31 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011AJ....142...31B 142, 31

    2011 doi

  8. [16]

    R., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aa7567 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AJ....154...28B 154, 28

    Blanton M. R., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aa7567 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AJ....154...28B 154, 28

    2017 doi

  9. [17]

    F., Zasowski G., Newman J

    Boardman N. F., Zasowski G., Newman J. A., Sanchez S. F., Schaefer A., Lian J., Bizyaev D., Drory N., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa3785 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.501..948B 501, 948

    2021 doi

  10. [18]

    Boardman N., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac1475 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.514.2298B 514, 2298

    2022 doi

  11. [19]

    F., Riffel R., Riffel R

    Boardman N., Wild V., Heckman T., Sanchez S. F., Riffel R., Riffel R. A., Zasowski G., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad277 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.520.4301B 520, 4301

    2023 doi

  12. [20]

    Boardman N., Wild V., Rowlands K., Vale Asari N., Luo Y., 2024a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad3932 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.52710788B 527, 10788

    doi

  13. [21]

    V., 2024b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slae071 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.534L...1B 534, L1

    Boardman N., Wild V., Asari N. V., 2024b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slae071 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.534L...1B 534, L1

    doi

  14. [22]

    S., Maiolino R., Kennicutt R., Cresci G., Mannucci F., Marconi A., Cicone C., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt817 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.433.1425B 433, 1425

    Bothwell M. S., Maiolino R., Kennicutt R., Cresci G., Mannucci F., Marconi A., Cicone C., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt817 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.433.1425B 433, 1425

    2013 doi

  15. [23]

    S., Maiolino R., Cicone C., Peng Y., Wagg J., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201527918 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...595A..48B 595, A48

    Bothwell M. S., Maiolino R., Cicone C., Peng Y., Wagg J., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201527918 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...595A..48B 595, A48

    2016 doi

  16. [24]

    Brown T., Cortese L., Catinella B., Kilborn V., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2452 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.473.1868B 473, 1868

    2018 doi

  17. [25]

    Bundy K., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/798/1/7 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...798....7B 798, 7

    2015 doi

  18. [26]

    Calura F., Pipino A., Chiappini C., Matteucci F., Maiolino R., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200911756 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...504..373C 504, 373

    2009 doi

  19. [27]

    Cappellari M., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt644 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.432.1862C 432, 1862

    2013 doi

  20. [28]

    A., Clayton G

    Cardelli J. A., Clayton G. C., Mathis J. S., 1989, @doi [ ] 10.1086/167900 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989ApJ...345..245C 345, 245

    1989 doi

  21. [29]

    Chabrier G., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/376392 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003PASP..115..763C 115, 763

    2003 doi

  22. [30]

    Chen X., Lin Z., Kong X., Liang Z., Chen G., Zhang H.-X., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac75b4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...933..228C 933, 228

    2022 doi

  23. [31]

    Cherinka B., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ab2634 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019AJ....158...74C 158, 74

    2019 doi

  24. [32]

    K., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20042292 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005A&A...437..429C 437, 429

    Chiappini C., Matteucci F., Ballero S. K., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20042292 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005A&A...437..429C 437, 429

    2005 doi

  25. [33]

    Cirasuolo M., et al., 2020, @doi [The Messenger] 10.18727/0722-6691/5195 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020Msngr.180...10C 180, 10

    2020 doi

  26. [34]

    S., Devlin S

    Cleveland W. S., Devlin S. J., 1988, @doi [Journal of the American Statistical Association] 10.1080/01621459.1988.10478639 , 83, 596

    1988

  27. [35]

    Conroy C., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-141017 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ARA&A..51..393C 51, 393

    2013 doi

  28. [37]

    Cresci G., Mannucci F., Curti M., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201834637 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...627A..42C 627, A42

    2019 doi

  29. [38]

    Curti M., Mannucci F., Cresci G., Maiolino R., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz2910 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.491..944C 491, 944

    2020 doi

  30. [39]

    Curti M., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2737 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.518..425C 518, 425

    2023 doi

  31. [40]

    Curti M., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202346698 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...684A..75C 684, A75

    2024 doi

  32. [41]

    M., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1424 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.479.1807D 479, 1807

    D'Eugenio F., Colless M., Groves B., Bian F., Barone T. M., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1424 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.479.1807D 479, 1807

    2018 doi

  33. [42]

    D., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20148.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.421...98D 421, 98

    Dav \'e R., Finlator K., Oppenheimer B. D., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20148.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.421...98D 421, 98

    2012

  34. [43]

    F., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1862 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.462.3265D 462, 3265

    Dav \'e R., Thompson R., Hopkins P. F., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1862 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.462.3265D 462, 3265

    2016 doi

  35. [44]

    H., Thompson R

    Dav \'e R., Rafieferantsoa M. H., Thompson R. J., Hopkins P. F., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx108 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.467..115D 467, 115

    2017 doi

  36. [45]

    E., Bower R

    De Rossi M. E., Bower R. G., Font A. S., Schaye J., Theuns T., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2158 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.472.3354D 472, 3354

    2017 doi

  37. [46]

    E., Bower R

    De Rossi M. E., Bower R. G., Font A. S., Schaye T., 2018, @doi [Boletin de la Asociacion Argentina de Astronomia La Plata Argentina] 10.48550/arXiv.1805.06119 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018BAAA...60..121R 60, 121

    2018 doi arXiv

  38. [47]

    A., Kewley L

    Dopita M. A., Kewley L. J., Sutherland R. S., Nicholls D. C., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s10509-016-2657-8 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016Ap

    2016 doi

  39. [48]

    Drory N., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/149/2/77 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015AJ....149...77D 149, 77

    2015 doi

  40. [49]

    M., Iglesias-P \'a ramo J., Moll \'a M., P \'e rez-Montero E., Kehrig C., Pilyugin L

    Duarte Puertas S., Vilchez J. M., Iglesias-P \'a ramo J., Moll \'a M., P \'e rez-Montero E., Kehrig C., Pilyugin L. S., Zinchenko I. A., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202141571 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...666A.186D 666, A186

    2022 doi

  41. [50]

    G., Pagel B

    Edmunds M. G., Pagel B. E. J., 1978, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/185.1.77P , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1978MNRAS.185P..77E 185, 77P

    1978 doi

  42. [51]

    L., Patton D

    Ellison S. L., Patton D. R., Simard L., McConnachie A. W., 2008a, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/135/5/1877 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008AJ....135.1877E 135, 1877

    doi

  43. [52]

    L., Patton D

    Ellison S. L., Patton D. R., Simard L., McConnachie A. W., 2008b, @doi [ ] 10.1086/527296 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...672L.107E 672, L107

    doi

  44. [53]

    L., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/822/1/29 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...822...29F 822, 29

    Faisst A. L., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/822/1/29 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...822...29F 822, 29

    2016 doi

  45. [54]

    Fernandez J., Alonso S., Mesa V., Duplancic F., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202245215 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...683A..32F 683, A32

    2024 doi

  46. [55]

    L., Massa D., Gordon K

    Fitzpatrick E. L., Massa D., Gordon K. D., Bohlin R., Clayton G. C., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4c3a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...886..108F 886, 108

    2019 doi

  47. [56]

    Florido E., Zurita A., P \'e rez-Montero E., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac919 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.513.2006F 513, 2006

    2022 doi

  48. [57]

    C., Krumholz M

    Forbes J. C., Krumholz M. R., Burkert A., Dekel A., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu1142 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.443..168F 443, 168

    2014 doi

  49. [58]

    Fraser-McKelvie A., Brown M. J. I., Pimbblet K., Dolley T., Bonne N. J., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2823 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.474.1909F 474, 1909

    2018 doi

  50. [59]

    Fraser-McKelvie A., Merrifield M., Arag \'o n-Salamanca A., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz2493 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.489.5030F 489, 5030

    2019 doi

  51. [60]

    Fraser-McKelvie A., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab3430 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.510..320F 510, 320

    2022 doi

  52. [61]

    Gallazzi A., Charlot S., Brinchmann J., White S. D. M., Tremonti C. A., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09321.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MNRAS.362...41G 362, 41

    2005

  53. [63]

    Garc \' a-Benito R., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201731357 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...608A..27G 608, A27

    2017 doi

  54. [64]

    M., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae737 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.529.3342G 529, 3342

    Garcia A. M., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae737 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.529.3342G 529, 3342

    2024 doi

  55. [65]

    arXiv:2206.14908

    Greene J., Bezanson R., Ouchi M., Silverman J., the PFS Galaxy Evolution Working Group 2022, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2206.14908 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022arXiv220614908G p. arXiv:2206.14908

    2022 doi arXiv

  56. [66]

    J., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2355 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.516.1275G 516, 1275

    Greener M. J., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2355 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.516.1275G 516, 1275

    2022 doi

  57. [67]

    E., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/500975 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006AJ....131.2332G 131, 2332

    Gunn J. E., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/500975 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006AJ....131.2332G 131, 2332

    2006 doi

  58. [68]

    Hayden-Pawson C., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac584 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.512.2867H 512, 2867

    2022 doi

  59. [69]

    E., et al., 2023, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-023-02078-7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023NatAs...7.1517H 7, 1517

    Heintz K. E., et al., 2023, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-023-02078-7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023NatAs...7.1517H 7, 1517

    2023 doi

  60. [70]

    B., Sillero E., Rosas-Guevara Y., Pedrosa S

    Jara-Ferreira F., Tissera P. B., Sillero E., Rosas-Guevara Y., Pedrosa S. E., De Rossi M. E., Theuns T., Bignone L., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae708 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.530.1369J 530, 1369

    2024 doi

  61. [71]

    W., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab2718 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.508.4484J 508, 4484

    Johnson J. W., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab2718 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.508.4484J 508, 4484

    2021 doi

  62. [72]

    W., Weinberg D

    Johnson J. W., Weinberg D. H., Vincenzo F., Bird J. C., Griffith E. J., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad057 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.520..782J 520, 782

    2023 doi

  63. [73]

    S., Laporte N., Treu T., Harikane Y., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abb943 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...903..150J 903, 150

    Jones T., Sanders R., Roberts-Borsani G., Ellis R. S., Laporte N., Treu T., Harikane Y., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abb943 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...903..150J 903, 150

    2020 doi

  64. [74]

    D., Daddi E., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8205/823/2/L24 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...823L..24K 823, L24

    Kashino D., Renzini A., Silverman J. D., Daddi E., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8205/823/2/L24 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...823L..24K 823, L24

    2016 doi

  65. [75]

    Kauffmann G., et al., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2003.07154.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.346.1055K 346, 1055

    2003

  66. [76]

    J., Heisler C

    Kewley L. J., Heisler C. A., Dopita M. A., Lumsden S., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/318944 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJS..132...37K 132, 37

    2001 doi

  67. [77]

    K \"o ppen J., Hensler G., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20042266 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005A&A...434..531K 434, 531

    2005 doi

  68. [78]

    Lacerda E. A. D., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx3022 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.474.3727L 474, 3727

    2018 doi

  69. [79]

    Lagos C. d. P., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw717 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.459.2632L 459, 2632

    2016 doi

  70. [80]

    A., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201014803 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...521L..53L 521, L53

    Lara-L \'o pez M. A., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201014803 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...521L..53L 521, L53

    2010 doi

  71. [81]

    R., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/150/1/19 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015AJ....150...19L 150, 19

    Law D. R., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/150/1/19 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015AJ....150...19L 150, 19

    2015 doi

  72. [82]

    R., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-6256/152/4/83 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2016AJ....152...83L 152, 83

    Law D. R., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-6256/152/4/83 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2016AJ....152...83L 152, 83

    2016 doi

  73. [83]

    R., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/abcaa2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021AJ....161...52L 161, 52

    Law D. R., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/abcaa2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021AJ....161...52L 161, 52

    2021 doi

  74. [84]

    F., Serrano A., Torres-Peimbert S., 1979, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1979A&A....80..155L 500, 145

    Lequeux J., Peimbert M., Rayo J. F., Serrano A., Torres-Peimbert S., 1979, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1979A&A....80..155L 500, 145

    1979

  75. [85]

    H., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae225 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.528.4029L 528, 4029

    Leung H.-H., Wild V., Papathomas M., Carnall A., Zheng Y., Boardman N., Wang C., Johansson P. H., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae225 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.528.4029L 528, 4029

    2024 doi

  76. [86]

    J., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad250c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...964...59L 964, 59

    Lewis Z. J., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad250c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...964...59L 964, 59

    2024 doi

  77. [87]

    Li H., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty334 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.476.1765L 476, 1765

    2018 doi

  78. [88]

    H., Li J

    Lian J. H., Li J. R., Yan W., Kong X., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu2184 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.446.1449L 446, 1449

    2015 doi

  79. [89]

    Lian J., Thomas D., Maraston C., Goddard D., Comparat J., Gonzalez-Perez V., Ventura P., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2829 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.474.1143L 474, 1143

    2018 doi

  80. [90]

    J., Carollo C

    Lilly S. J., Carollo C. M., Pipino A., Renzini A., Peng Y., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/772/2/119 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...772..119L 772, 119

    2013 doi

  81. [91]

    J., D'Eugenio F., Piotrowska J

    Looser T. J., D'Eugenio F., Piotrowska J. M., Belfiore F., Maiolino R., Cappellari M., Baker W. M., Tacchella S., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1581 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.532.2832L 532, 2832

    2024 doi

  82. [92]

    L \'o pez Fern \'a ndez R., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw260 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.458..184L 458, 184

    2016 doi

  83. [93]

    C., Sheng M.-J., Liao S., 2024a, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202450397 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...689A.293M 689, A293

    Ma H.-C., Du M., Ho L. C., Sheng M.-J., Liao S., 2024a, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202450397 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...689A.293M 689, A293

    doi

  84. [94]

    Ma C., et al., 2024b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ad675f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...971L..14M 971, L14

    doi

  85. [95]

    Maiolino R., Mannucci F., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s00159-018-0112-2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&ARv..27....3M 27, 3

    2019 doi

  86. [96]

    Maiolino R., et al., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:200809678 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008A&A...488..463M 488, 463

    2008 doi

  87. [97]

    Maiolino R., et al., 2020, @doi [The Messenger] 10.18727/0722-6691/5197 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020Msngr.180...24M 180, 24

    2020 doi

  88. [98]

    Mannucci F., Cresci G., Maiolino R., Marconi A., Gnerucci A., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17291.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.408.2115M 408, 2115

    2010

  89. [99]

    Maoz D., Sharon K., Gal-Yam A., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/722/2/1879 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...722.1879M 722, 1879

    2010 doi

  90. [100]

    Marinacci F., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2206 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.480.5113M 480, 5113

    2018 doi

  91. [101]

    C., Feldmann R., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ad4cee , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...967L..41M 967, L41

    Marszewski A., Sun G., Faucher-Gigu \`e re C.-A., Hayward C. C., Feldmann R., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ad4cee , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...967L..41M 967, L41

    2024 doi

  92. [102]

    Matteucci F., 1986, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/221.4.911 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1986MNRAS.221..911M 221, 911

    1986 doi

  93. [103]

    Matthee J., Schaye J., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/sly093 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.479L..34M 479, L34

    2018 doi

  94. [104]

    Matthee J., Schaye J., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz030 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.484..915M 484, 915

    2019 doi

  95. [105]

    M., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv105 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.448.3484M 448, 3484

    McDermid R. M., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv105 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.448.3484M 448, 3484

    2015 doi

  96. [106]

    M., Gavil \'a n M., D \' az A

    Moll \'a M., V \' lchez J. M., Gavil \'a n M., D \' az A. I., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10892.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MNRAS.372.1069M 372, 1069

    2006

  97. [107]

    A., Peeples M

    Mu \ n oz J. A., Peeples M. S., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv048 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.448.1430M 448, 1430

    2015 doi

  98. [108]

    P., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty618 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.477.1206N 477, 1206

    Naiman J. P., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty618 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.477.1206N 477, 1206

    2018 doi

  99. [109]

    Nakajima K., Ouchi M., Isobe Y., Harikane Y., Zhang Y., Ono Y., Umeda H., Oguri M., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/acd556 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJS..269...33N 269, 33

    2023 doi

  100. [110]

    Nelson D., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx3040 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.475..624N 475, 624

    2018 doi

  101. [111]

    Nelson D., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz2306 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.490.3234N 490, 3234

    2019 doi

  102. [112]

    Nersesian A., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202452662 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...695A..86N 695, A86

    2025 doi

  103. [113]

    C., Sutherland R

    Nicholls D. C., Sutherland R. S., Dopita M. A., Kewley L. J., Groves B. A., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw3235 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.466.4403N 466, 4403

    2017 doi

  104. [114]

    E., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/173713 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJ...422..158O 422, 158

    O'Donnell J. E., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/173713 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJ...422..158O 422, 158

    1994 doi

  105. [115]

    E., Pogge R

    Osterbrock D. E., Pogge R. W., 1985, @doi [ ] 10.1086/163513 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985ApJ...297..166O 297, 166

    1985 doi

  106. [116]

    S., Somerville R

    Peeples M. S., Somerville R. S., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sts158 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.428.1766P 428, 1766

    2013 doi

  107. [117]

    Peng Y., Maiolino R., Cochrane R., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature14439 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015Natur.521..192P 521, 192

    2015 doi

  108. [118]

    P \'e rez-Montero E., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220070 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...549A..25P 549, A25

    2013 doi

  109. [119]

    P \'e rez-Montero E., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201628601 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A\

    2016 doi

  110. [121]

    Pillepich A., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx3112 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.475..648P 475, 648

    2018 doi

  111. [122]

    Pillepich A., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz2338 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.490.3196P 490, 3196

    2019 doi

  112. [123]

    S., V \' lchez J

    Pilyugin L. S., V \' lchez J. M., Thuan T. X., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/720/2/1738 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...720.1738P 720, 1738

    2010 doi

  113. [124]

    Pistis F., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202346943 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...683A.203P 683, A203

    2024 doi

  114. [125]

    C., Ly C., Brinchmann J., Dav \'e R., Dickinson M., Salzer J

    Salim S., Lee J. C., Ly C., Brinchmann J., Dav \'e R., Dickinson M., Salzer J. J., Charlot S., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/797/2/126 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...797..126S 797, 126

    2014 doi

  115. [126]

    S \'a nchez Almeida J., Dalla Vecchia C., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aac086 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...859..109S 859, 109

    2018 doi

  116. [127]

    F., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abba7c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...903...52S 903, 52

    S \'a nchez-Menguiano L., S \'a nchez Almeida J., Mu \ n oz-Tu \ n \'o n C., S \'a nchez S. F., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abba7c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...903...52S 903, 52

    2020 doi

  117. [128]

    F., Mu \ n oz-Tu \ n \'o n C., 2024a, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202346708 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...681A.121S 681, A121

    S \'a nchez-Menguiano L., S \'a nchez Almeida J., S \'a nchez S. F., Mu \ n oz-Tu \ n \'o n C., 2024a, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202346708 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...681A.121S 681, A121

    doi

  118. [129]

    F., S \'a nchez Almeida J., Mu \ n oz-Tu \ n \'o n C., 2024b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202348423 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...682L..11S 682, L11

    S \'a nchez-Menguiano L., S \'a nchez S. F., S \'a nchez Almeida J., Mu \ n oz-Tu \ n \'o n C., 2024b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202348423 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...682L..11S 682, L11

    doi

  119. [130]

    F., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220669 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...554A..58S 554, A58

    S \'a nchez S. F., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220669 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...554A..58S 554, A58

    2013 doi

  120. [131]

    F., et al., 2016a, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016RMxAA..52...21S 52, 21

    S \'a nchez S. F., et al., 2016a, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016RMxAA..52...21S 52, 21

  121. [132]

    F., et al., 2016b, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016RMxAA..52..171S 52, 171

    S \'a nchez S. F., et al., 2016b, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016RMxAA..52..171S 52, 171

  122. [133]

    F., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx808 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.469.2121S 469, 2121

    S \'a nchez S. F., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx808 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.469.2121S 469, 2121

    2017 doi

  123. [134]

    F., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2730 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.482.1557S 482, 1557

    S \'a nchez S. F., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2730 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.482.1557S 482, 1557

    2019 doi

  124. [135]

    F., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ac7b8f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJS..262...36S 262, 36

    S \'a nchez S. F., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ac7b8f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJS..262...36S 262, 36

    2022 doi

  125. [136]

    L., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aabcbd , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...858...99S 858, 99

    Sanders R. L., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aabcbd , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...858...99S 858, 99

    2018 doi

  126. [137]

    L., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac651a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...930..160S 930, 160

    Schaefer A. L., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac651a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...930..160S 930, 160

    2022 doi

  127. [138]

    Schaye J., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu2058 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.446..521S 446, 521

    2015 doi

  128. [139]

    J., Finkbeiner D

    Schlegel D. J., Finkbeiner D. P., Davis M., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/305772 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...500..525S 500, 525

    1998 doi

  129. [140]

    Schmidt M., 1963, @doi [ ] 10.1086/147553 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1963ApJ...137..758S 137, 758

    1963 doi

  130. [141]

    Scholte D., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae2477 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.535.2341S 535, 2341

    2024 doi

  131. [142]

    Scott N., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15275.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.398.1835S 398, 1835

    2009

  132. [143]

    Scott N., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2166 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.472.2833S 472, 2833

    2017 doi

  133. [144]

    J., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac6096 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...931...51S 931, 51

    Setton D. J., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac6096 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...931...51S 931, 51

    2022 doi

  134. [145]

    L., Stark D

    Sharma A., Masters K. L., Stark D. V., Garland J., Drory N., Fraser-McKelvie A., Weijmans A.-M., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad2695 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.526.1573S 526, 1573

    2023 doi

  135. [146]

    T., Patton D

    Simard L., Mendel J. T., Patton D. R., Ellison S. L., McConnachie A. W., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/196/1/11 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJS..196...11S 196, 11

    2011 doi

  136. [147]

    A., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/146/2/32 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013AJ....146...32S 146, 32

    Smee S. A., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/146/2/32 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013AJ....146...32S 146, 32

    2013 doi

  137. [148]

    Spitoni E., Calura F., Mignoli M., Gilli R., Silva Aguirre V., Gallazzi A., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202037879 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...642A.113S 642, A113

    2020 doi

  138. [149]

    Springel V., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx3304 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.475..676S 475, 676

    2018 doi

  139. [150]

    M., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1705 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.532.3102S 532, 3102

    Stanton T. M., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1705 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.532.3102S 532, 3102

    2024 doi

  140. [151]

    L., Steidel C

    Strom A. L., Steidel C. C., Rudie G. C., Trainor R. F., Pettini M., Reddy N. A., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/836/2/164 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...836..164S 836, 164

    2017 doi

  141. [152]

    G., Dalcanton J

    Telford O. G., Dalcanton J. J., Skillman E. D., Conroy C., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/827/1/35 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...827...35T 827, 35

    2016 doi

  142. [153]

    X., Woosley S

    Timmes F. X., Woosley S. E., Weaver T. A., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/192172 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJS...98..617T 98, 617

    1995 doi

  143. [154]

    Ting Y.-S., Rix H.-W., Conroy C., Ho A. Y. Q., Lin J., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aa921c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...849L...9T 849, L9

    2017 doi

  144. [155]

    Ting Y.-S., Conroy C., Rix H.-W., Asplund M., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aac6c9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...860..159T 860, 159

    2018 doi

  145. [156]

    Torrey P., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/sly031 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.477L..16T 477, L16

    2018 doi

  146. [157]

    Torrey P., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz243 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.484.5587T 484, 5587

    2019 doi

  147. [158]

    K., Ginolfi M., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202140414 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...657A..19T 657, A19

    Tortora C., Hunt L. K., Ginolfi M., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202140414 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...657A..19T 657, A19

    2022 doi

  148. [159]

    A., et al., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/423264 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...613..898T 613, 898

    Tremonti C. A., et al., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/423264 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...613..898T 613, 898

    2004 doi

  149. [160]

    Trussler J., Maiolino R., Maraston C., Peng Y., Thomas D., Goddard D., Lian J., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz3286 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.491.5406T 491, 5406

    2020 doi

  150. [161]

    S., Cid Fernandes R., Stasi \'n ska G., de Amorim A

    Vale Asari N., Couto G. S., Cid Fernandes R., Stasi \'n ska G., de Amorim A. L., Ruschel-Dutra D., Werle A., Florido T. Z., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz2470 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.489.4721V 489, 4721

    2019 doi

  151. [162]

    P., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2304 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.516.2971V 516, 2971

    Vaughan S. P., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2304 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.516.2971V 516, 2971

    2022 doi

  152. [163]

    E., 1987, @doi [ ] 10.1086/191166 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1987ApJS...63..295V 63, 295

    Veilleux S., Osterbrock D. E., 1987, @doi [ ] 10.1086/191166 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1987ApJS...63..295V 63, 295

    1987 doi

  153. [164]

    Vera M., Alonso S., Coldwell G., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201628750 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...595A..63V 595, A63

    2016 doi

  154. [165]

    Vincenzo F., Belfiore F., Maiolino R., Matteucci F., Ventura P., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw532 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.458.3466V 458, 3466

    2016 doi

  155. [166]

    A., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aa7ecc , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AJ....154...86W 154, 86

    Wake D. A., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aa7ecc , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AJ....154...86W 154, 86

    2017 doi

  156. [167]

    J., et al., 2019, @doi [The Messenger] 10.18727/0722-6691/5118 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019Msngr.175...12W 175, 12

    Walcher C. J., et al., 2019, @doi [The Messenger] 10.18727/0722-6691/5118 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019Msngr.175...12W 175, 12

    2019 doi

  157. [168]

    R., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty3264 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.483.2382W 483, 2382

    Werle A., Cid Fernandes R., Vale Asari N., Bruzual G., Charlot S., Gonzalez Delgado R., Herpich F. R., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty3264 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.483.2382W 483, 2382

    2019 doi

  158. [169]

    B., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ab44a2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019AJ....158..231W 158, 231

    Westfall K. B., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ab44a2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019AJ....158..231W 158, 231

    2019 doi

  159. [170]

    Wild V., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa674 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.494..529W 494, 529

    2020 doi

  160. [171]

    Wuyts S., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/742/2/96 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...742...96W 742, 96

    2011 doi

  161. [172]

    Yan R., et al., 2016a, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-6256/151/1/8 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016AJ....151....8Y 151, 8

    doi

  162. [173]

    Yan R., et al., 2016b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-6256/152/6/197 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016AJ....152..197Y 152, 197

    doi

  163. [174]

    Yan R., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3ebc , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...883..175Y 883, 175

    2019 doi

  164. [175]

    Yang N., Scholte D., Saintonge A., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad3917 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.52711043Y 527, 11043

    2024 doi

  165. [176]

    I., Zaritsky D., Lin H., Tucker D., Hashimoto Y., Shectman S

    Zabludoff A. I., Zaritsky D., Lin H., Tucker D., Hashimoto Y., Shectman S. A., Oemler A., Kirshner R. P., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/177495 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJ...466..104Z 466, 104

    1996 doi

  166. [177]

    J., Dima G

    Zahid H. J., Dima G. I., Kudritzki R.-P., Kewley L. J., Geller M. J., Hwang H. S., Silverman J. D., Kashino D., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/791/2/130 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...791..130Z 791, 130

    2014 doi

  167. [178]

    J., De Rossi M

    Zenocratti L. J., De Rossi M. E., Theuns T., Lara-L \'o pez M. A., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac906 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.512.6164Z 512, 6164

    2022 doi

  168. [179]

    Zhou Y., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2016 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.515.5081Z 515, 5081

    2022 doi

  169. [180]

    Zhuang Z., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5ff8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...972..182Z 972, 182

    2024 doi

  170. [181]

    A., V \' lchez J

    Zinchenko I. A., V \' lchez J. M., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202450273 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...690A..13Z 690, A13

    2024 doi

  171. [182]

    S., et al., 2019, @doi [The Messenger] 10.18727/0722-6691/5117 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019Msngr.175....3D 175, 3

    de Jong R. S., et al., 2019, @doi [The Messenger] 10.18727/0722-6691/5117 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019Msngr.175....3D 175, 3

    2019 doi

  172. [183]

    van der Wel A., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/788/1/28 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...788...28V 788, 28

    2014 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.