Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 69 references

Dust-obscured Galaxies with Broken Power-law Spectral Energy Distributions Discovered by UNIONS

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Dust-obscured galaxies with power-law SEDs split into two populations, and the broken power-law half are more heavily obscured active galactic nuclei.

desk verdict A careful DOG catalog with a genuinely useful selection-bias analysis, but the new 'broken power-law' subclass rests on an untested bimodality that may just be a threshold effect. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.15023 v2 pith:DTFJGIPR submitted 2025-04-21 astro-ph.GA

Taketo Yoshida , Tohru Nagao , Yoshiki Toba , Akatoki Noboriguchi , Kohei Ichikawa , Hendrik Hildebrandt , Naomichi Yutani , Kenneth C. Chambers
show 6 more authors
Ryo Iwamoto Seira Kobayashi Masamune Oguri Ken Osato Kohei Shibata Yuxing Zhong
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords dust-obscuredgalaxiesactivegalacticnucleispectralenergydistributionsbrokenpower-lawSEDinfraredgalaxymergersUNIONSsurvey
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that roughly half of power-law dust-obscured galaxies (PL DOGs) are not simple power laws but show a broken spectral energy distribution: a steep optical-to-near-infrared slope and a flatter mid-infrared slope, with the break around an observed wavelength of 4 µm. It identifies 382 DOGs across ~170 deg² using UNIONS optical, UKIDSS near-infrared, and WISE mid-infrared photometry, classifies 376 as bump (star-formation-dominated) or power-law (AGN-dominated), and finds 120 of 244 PL DOGs are broken. The paper interprets the red optical-to-NIR slope as heavy dust extinction, so BPL DOGs are more heavily obscured AGNs than normal PL DOGs. This matters because such heavily obscured systems are a predicted, rarely resolved stage in the merger-driven co-evolution of supermassive black holes and galaxies, and because the same SED shape connects these nearby dusty AGNs to Hot DOGs and high-redshift little red dots.

What carries the argument

The central object is the broken power-law SED itself, quantified by two slopes fitted to the same photometry: $\alpha_{\rm MIR}$ from a power law $F_\nu\propto\lambda^\alpha$ over WISE 4.6–22 µm, and $\alpha_{\rm optNIR}$ over g through K band. The break criterion is $\alpha_{\rm optNIR}-\alpha_{\rm MIR}\ge 1.0$, chosen at the local minimum of the slope-difference histogram. The mechanism doing the interpretive work is the contrast between the two slopes: the mid-IR slope tracks hot AGN-heated dust, while the optical-NIR slope tracks how much starlight is reddened by dust, so a large difference is read as heavy extinction rather than a different power source.

What would settle it

Measure X-ray absorbing column densities for a matched sample of BPL and NPL DOGs: if the two classes have the same $N_{\rm H}$ distribution, the claim that BPL DOGs are more heavily obscured fails. A second, cheap test is to fit a two-component Gaussian mixture or run a dip test on the $\alpha_{\rm optNIR}-\alpha_{\rm MIR}$ histogram; a unimodal result would show the split is a threshold artifact rather than a physical dichotomy.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Among infrared-bright DOGs with $(i-[22])_{\rm AB}\ge 7.0$, the SEDs of AGN-dominated power-law DOGs divide into two classes: normal power-law DOGs (NPL) with a single slope from optical to mid-infrared, and broken power-law DOGs (BPL) whose optical-to-NIR slope is steeper by $\alpha_{\rm optNIR}-\alpha_{\rm MIR}\ge 1.0$ and whose break sits near $\lambda_{\rm obs}\sim4\,\mu$m. The paper argues that the steeper optical-NIR slope reflects a larger dust column, making BPL DOGs more heavily obscured AGNs than NPL DOGs, with both a torus-viewing-angle scenario and an earlier-evolutionary-stage scenario proposed. It further shows that the BPL fraction rises steeply with K-band brightness, so the observed ~49% fraction is partly a selection effect of the shallow UKIDSS near-infrared limit, and that the BPL SEDs resemble torus templates and heavily reddened type-1 quasars.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the histogram of $\alpha_{\rm optNIR}-\alpha_{\rm MIR}$ really contains two populations and that the cut at 1.0, placed at the histogram's local minimum, separates them; no formal bimodality test is offered, so if the distribution is actually smooth, the broken power-law class is an artifact of the chosen threshold.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • X-ray follow-up of BPL DOGs should find higher column densities and lower detection fractions than for NPL DOGs at the same mid-IR luminosity.
  • The intrinsic BPL fraction is lower than 49%; deeper near-infrared data such as Euclid should show the fraction drop once the UKIDSS K-band selection bias is removed.
  • BPL DOGs at z~1 can serve as low-redshift analogs of heavily reddened type-1 quasars and torus-dominated systems, giving spatially resolved targets that high-redshift analogs lack.
  • If the transition-phase scenario is right, BPL DOGs should have higher specific star formation and stronger outflows than NPL DOGs, and the bump-to-BPL-to-NPL sequence becomes observationally testable.
  • The full UNIONS+Euclid overlap should yield about 90,000 DOGs, enough to measure luminosity functions separately for bump, normal-PL, and broken-PL subclasses.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A physical SED-fitting extension would replace the empirical threshold with a fitted dust column $A_V$ or $N_{\rm H}$; if the BPL/NPL split survives as a gap in $A_V$, the dichotomy is real, whereas if $A_V$ is continuous, the threshold is a convenience.
  • The comparison with little red dots suggests that low-redshift analogs of LRDs may be hiding in DOG-like samples but fail the $(i-[22])$ color; a mid-IR or red-NIR selection could recover them and test whether BPL DOGs and LRDs share a common dusty-AGN geometry.
  • One can test the evolutionary ordering statistically with radio or [O III] stacking: if BPL DOGs are earlier in the merger sequence, they should show elevated star formation and outflow indicators relative to NPL DOGs at fixed luminosity, independent of the K-band selection effect.
  • A cleaner selection experiment would compare the BPL fraction over the same sky area with and without a K-band detection requirement; the paper's own no-NIR DOG sample (34,722 objects) already offers the parent population for such a test.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper identifies 382 dust-obscured galaxies (DOGs) in the UNIONS-UKIDSS-WISE overlap region (~170 deg²), classifies 376 of them into 132 bump DOGs and 244 power-law (PL) DOGs, and then further splits the PL DOGs into 120 'broken power-law' (BPL) and 124 'normal power-law' (NPL) objects based on the difference between the optical-to-NIR slope α_optNIR and the mid-IR slope α_MIR. The authors argue that BPL DOGs are more heavily obscured AGNs than NPL DOGs, discuss viewing-angle and evolutionary-transition scenarios, compare their SEDs with local templates, hot DOGs, and little red dots, and demonstrate that the BPL fraction depends strongly on K-band detection depth.

Significance. The paper presents a large, carefully assembled sample and is commendably transparent about selection effects, particularly in Sections 4.2 and 4.4 where the K-band-dependent BPL fraction is quantified. If the bimodality of α_optNIR − α_MIR is real, the identification of a substantial population of BPL DOGs would be a noteworthy step for understanding obscured AGN evolution. However, the central claim rests on a data-chosen threshold that has not been statistically validated, and the physical interpretation is partly circular, so the paper's main conclusion is not yet established. The strengths are the wide-area sample, the explicit discussion of survey-depth biases, and the detailed SED comparison with related populations.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.3, Figure 3] The BPL/NPL split is defined by applying the threshold α_optNIR − α_MIR = 1.0, chosen as the local minimum between 'two potential peaks' in Figure 3, but the manuscript does not report any formal test for bimodality (e.g., Hartigan's dip test, Gaussian mixture modeling, or a likelihood-ratio test against a single Gaussian). Because the sample mean of α_optNIR − α_MIR is 1.0 with standard deviation 0.7, a threshold at the mean of a unimodal distribution would mechanically produce approximately 50% on each side, which is exactly the observed 120/244 split. The claim that BPL and NPL are two distinct populations therefore requires a formal test before the reported fraction or the physical interpretation can be accepted.
  2. [Table 1] The KS tests in Table 1 are not independent confirmation of a distinct BPL population. The normal-PL versus broken-PL comparison for α_optNIR is essentially guaranteed to be significant because the classes were constructed by cutting on α_optNIR relative to α_MIR; the small p-value for α_optNIR is therefore circular. The α_MIR p-value of 3.5 × 10⁻¹⁶ is more informative, but it should be presented as the only post-classification test, and it should be accompanied by an effect size rather than a p-value alone.
  3. [§3.3, Figures 3-5] No uncertainties are reported for the fitted slopes α_optNIR and α_MIR, despite the classification threshold and all KS tests being computed from these slopes. The photometric errors in UNIONS, UKIDSS, and WISE, the treatment of nondetections in the power-law fits, and the band-to-band scatter visible in Figure 4 should be propagated into slope uncertainties; without them the reader cannot assess whether the 1.0 threshold is significant relative to measurement noise.
  4. [§4.1] The central physical conclusion that BPL DOGs are more heavily obscured than NPL DOGs is inferred from the same α_optNIR − α_MIR quantity used to define the classes. The comparison with Banerji et al. (2013) and the template matching in Figure 4 are suggestive, but they do not break the circularity. An independent obscuration indicator, such as X-ray column densities, WISE color-color diagnostics, or SED fitting with an explicit extinction parameter for both samples, is needed to support the claim that the steeper optical-to-NIR slope reflects heavier obscuration rather than, for example, a different stellar population or AGN continuum shape.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§4.2, Figure 6] The Spearman correlation of −0.63 between K-band magnitude and α_optNIR − α_MIR is computed on the combined sample from two surveys with different depths; please also report the correlation within each sample separately to ensure that the trend is not driven by the survey offset.
  2. [§4.1.2 and References] There is a typo 'chracterized' in the first sentence of §4.1.2, and the reference 'Barnes and Hermquist 1991' should be corrected to 'Barnes & Hernquist 1991'.
  3. [Figures 4 and 8] Several labels are garbled: 'Trus' in Figure 4 should be 'torus', and Figure 8 contains 'obse0ved w velength' and '12 ck ed LRD', which need correction. Please also clarify the normalization of the LRD SEDs in Figure 8.
  4. [§2.4] The pre-selection criterion is written as i − K ≥ 1.2; since the K-band Vega-to-AB offset is given in Section 2.2, please state explicitly whether all colors in the selection are in the AB system.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

BPL/NPL split is defined by a data-chosen threshold in αoptNIR−αMIR, so the reported 120/244 fraction and the KS 'validation' are partially circular; the physical obscuration claim retains external support.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 3.3, Figure 3 and the definition of BPL DOGs]
    "The distribution of αoptNIR−αMIR appears to have a bimodal structure, suggesting the possible presence of two populations corresponding to NPL and BPL DOGs. Based on this, we define BPL DOGs as PL DOGs with αoptNIR−αMIR≥ 1.0, which corresponds to the local minimum between the two potential peaks. As a result, roughly half (120/244) of the PL DOGs are classified as BPL DOGs."

    The BPL/NPL boundary is chosen from the observed histogram of αoptNIR−αMIR, specifically the 'local minimum between the two potential peaks', and the reported 120/244 BPL fraction is simply the count of objects on one side of that fitted cut. Since the paper states that the mean of this statistic is 1.0 with σ=0.7, cutting at 1.0 would split a near-symmetric unimodal distribution into roughly equal halves even if no bimodality exists. No formal bimodality test is presented, so the quoted 'roughly half' and the existence of the BPL class are imposed by the data-driven threshold rather than independently measured.

  2. self definitional [Section 3.3, Table 1 (KS tests between NPL and BPL DOGs)]
    "Finally, we performed Kolmogorov–Smirnov test for αoptNIR and αMIR between each pair of subclasses (Table 1). The p-values are significantly small for all cases, indicating that the distributions of the subclasses in the αoptNIR-αMIR plane are statistically different with > 3σ significance."

    NPL and BPL are defined by the same cut in αoptNIR−αMIR used to construct the two groups. The KS test then reports that the αoptNIR and αMIR distributions of these self-defined groups differ with high significance. This is not independent evidence for two physical populations: the classification already separates objects on one side of the cut from those on the other, so significant p-values are largely a restatement of the defining threshold. The test is used to validate the dichotomy, but the dichotomy is the input to the test, making the statistical support circular.

full rationale

The central empirical result—that roughly half of PL DOGs are 'broken'—is obtained by cutting the observed αoptNIR−αMIR histogram at 1.0, the local minimum claimed by the authors. Because the threshold is chosen from the same distribution it is used to dichotomize, the 120/244 count is a direct consequence of the cut rather than an independent measurement of a two-population structure; with mean 1.0 and σ=0.7, cutting at 1.0 would give about half even for a unimodal distribution. The KS tests in Table 1 then compare groups defined by this very cut, so the small p-values do not provide independent evidence that the dichotomy is physical. This is a genuine but partial circularity. The paper is not otherwise circular: the interpretation of steep optical-NIR slopes as heavy obscuration is anchored in external dust-reddening models and comparisons to Banerji et al. (2013) and torus templates, and the authors explicitly examine selection effects in Section 4.2. No load-bearing self-citation or uniqueness import is present; Toba et al. (2015) and Noboriguchi et al. (2019) provide method and comparison sample, not the physical conclusion. The score 4 reflects one construction-based reduction (the threshold-to-fraction mapping and the self-defined KS validation) while the central physical interpretation retains independent content.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central classification rests on one data-driven threshold (the BPL cut) and on domain assumptions about dust reddening and redshift. No new physical entities are introduced; BPL DOG is a classification label rather than a new particle, force, or conserved quantity.

free parameters (1)
  • BPL slope-difference threshold = 1.0
    The definition of BPL as alpha_optNIR minus alpha_MIR >= 1.0 is chosen as the local minimum of the observed distribution of the 244 PL DOGs. The reported fraction of 120/244 is therefore determined by this data-driven cut.
assumptions (4)
  • ad hoc to paper The bimodality in the alpha_optNIR minus alpha_MIR distribution is real and the threshold at 1.0 separates two physically distinct populations.
    No formal statistical test for bimodality (such as a dip test or Gaussian mixture model) is presented; the threshold is set by eye at the local minimum of the histogram in Figure 3.
  • domain assumption The steep optical-NIR slope traces line-of-sight dust extinction.
    The paper follows Banerji et al. (2013) and torus models in attributing large scatter in alpha_optNIR to dust extinction (Section 4.1), but no direct NH measurements are made for the sample.
  • domain assumption IR-bright DOGs are at z about 1.
    The interpretation of the 1.6 micron bump and the template comparisons assume z ~ 1 for IR-bright DOGs (Section 3.1), following previous work.
  • domain assumption The cross-matching and photometric quality cuts reliably identify DOGs.
    Standard matching radii and WISE/UNIONS quality flags are used (Sections 2.1-2.4), but contamination and incompleteness are not fully quantified, especially for the no-NIR comparison sample.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dust-obscured Galaxies with Broken Power-law Spectral Energy Distributions Discovered by UNIONS." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DTFJGIPR

@misc{pith2026250415023,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dust-obscured Galaxies with Broken Power-law Spectral Energy Distributions Discovered by UNIONS},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DTFJGIPR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.15023}
}
abstract

We report on the spectral energy distributions (SEDs) of infrared-bright dust-obscured galaxies (DOGs) with $(i - [22])_{\rm AB} \geq 7.0$. Using photometry from the deep and wide Ultraviolet Near-Infrared Optical Northern Survey, combined with near-IR and mid-IR data from the UKIRT Infrared Deep Sky Survey and the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer, we successfully identified 382 DOGs in $\sim$ 170 deg$^2$. Among them, the vast majority (376 DOGs) were classified into two subclasses: bump DOGs (132/376) and power-law (PL) DOGs (244/376), which are dominated by star formation and active galactic nucleus (AGN), respectively. Through the SED analysis, we found that roughly half (120/244) of the PL DOGs show ``broken'' power-law SEDs. The significant red slope from optical to near-IR in the SEDs of these ``broken power-law DOGs'' (BPL DOGs) probably reflects their large amount of dust extinction. In other words, BPL DOGs are more heavily obscured AGNs, compared to PL DOGs with non-broken power-law SEDs.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.15023 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Comparison of the 22 µm flux distribution of our DOG sample with the 24 µm flux distribution of DOGs from Melbourne et al. (2012). The numbers in parentheses indicate the number of objects in each sample. DOGs. In contrast, we combined wide-field optical and NIR survey data with the AllWISE catalog covering a largest survey area but with a shallower sensitivity. As a result, our DOG sample has higher MIR fluxes comp… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The histogram of the difference between the optical-NIR and MIR slopes (αoptNIR − αMIR) of PL DOGs. The red dash-dotted line represents the criterion to separate normal-PL (NPL) and broken-PL (BPL) DOGs. The num￾ber in parentheses indicates the total count of PL DOGs. SEDs of the bump DOGs and PL DOGs, respectively. The peak of bump feature in the SED of bump DOGs is shown around 3.4 µm, suggesting that their redshi… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: SEDs of normal-PL DOGs (left panel) and broken-PL DOGs (right panel). The diamonds and dotted lines represent the median and individual SEDs, respectively. Note that the median flux density is not shown for bands in which more than half of the objects are undetected. T…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: shows the comparison of αoptNIR and αMIR of three subclasses of DOGs. First, bump and PL DOGs (including both broken and normal) are separated by αMIR, consistent with the results of Noboriguchi et al. (2019). They reported that bump DOGs have redder colors in the MIR …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Fraction of broken-PL DOGs among PL DOGs (BPL DOG fraction) as a function of K-band (Ks-band) magnitude (bottom panel), which is calculated based on the PL DOG samples in both Noboriguchi et al. (2019) and our work. The Poisson error in the fraction was estimated us￾in…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: , we compare the SEDs of our BPL DOGs with the median SED of Hot DOGs presented by Tsai et al. (2015). For a fair comparison, we shifted the median SED of Hot DOGs from their typical redshift of z = 3.0 (Tsai et al. 2015) to z = 1.0, which is more representa￾tive of IR…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Comparison of the 3σ detection limits of wide-field surveys (open squares: UNIONS, open circles: WISE, filled light-blue stars: UKIDSS, filled dark-blue stars: Euclid). Red dash-dotted line denotes a power law from the 3σ detection limits of UNIONS i-band to WISE 22 µm…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    B., Casey, C

    Akins, H. B., Casey, C. M., Lambrides, E., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2406.10341, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2406.10341

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.10341 2024

  2. [2]

    G., Alexander, D

    Alonso-Herrero, A., P´ erez-Gonz´ alez, P. G., Alexander, D. M., et al. 2006, ApJ, 640, 167, doi: 10.1086/499800 12

    doi:10.1086/499800 2006

  3. [3]

    J., Eisenhardt, P

    Assef, R. J., Eisenhardt, P. R. M., Stern, D., et al. 2015, ApJ, 804, 27, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/804/1/27

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/804/1/27 2015

  4. [4]

    Gonzalez-Solares, E., & Koposov, S. E. 2013, MNRAS, 429, L55, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/sls023

    doi:10.1093/mnrasl/sls023 2013

  5. [5]

    E., & Hernquist, L

    Barnes, J. E., & Hernquist, L. E. 1991, ApJL, 370, L65, doi: 10.1086/185978

    doi:10.1086/185978 1991

  6. [6]

    G., Kocevski, D

    Barro, G., P´ erez-Gonz´ alez, P. G., Kocevski, D. D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 963, 128, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad167e

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad167e 2024

  7. [7]

    1996, A&AS, 117, 393, doi: 10.1051/aas:1996164

    Bertin, E., & Arnouts, S. 1996, A&AS, 117, 393, doi: 10.1051/aas:1996164

    doi:10.1051/aas:1996164 1996

  8. [8]

    F., Satyapal, S., & Ellison, S

    Blecha, L., Snyder, G. F., Satyapal, S., & Ellison, S. L. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 3056, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1274

    doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1274 2018

Show all 69 references
  1. [9]

    2007, ApJ, 663, 204, doi: 10.1086/518119

    Brand, K., Dey, A., Desai, V., et al. 2007, ApJ, 663, 204, doi: 10.1086/518119

    2007 doi

  2. [10]

    S., Dey, A., Borys, C., et al

    Bussmann, R. S., Dey, A., Borys, C., et al. 2009, ApJ, 705, 184, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/705/1/184

    2009 doi

  3. [11]

    S., Dey, A., Armus, L., et al

    Bussmann, R. S., Dey, A., Armus, L., et al. 2012, ApJ, 744, 150, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/744/2/150

    2012 doi

  4. [12]

    C., Magnier, E

    Chambers, K. C., Magnier, E. A., Metcalfe, N., et al. 2016, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1612.05560, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1612.05560

    2016 doi arXiv

  5. [13]

    M., & Norman, C

    Chiaberge, M., Gilli, R., Lotz, J. M., & Norman, C. 2015, ApJ, 806, 147, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/806/2/147

    2015 doi

  6. [14]

    2016, A&A, 592, A109, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527624

    Corral, A., Georgantopoulos, I., Comastri, A., et al. 2016, A&A, 592, A109, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527624

    2016 doi

  7. [15]

    M., Wright, E

    Cutri, R. M., Wright, E. L., Conrow, T., et al. 2021, VizieR Online Data Catalog: AllWISE Data Release (Cutri+ 2013), VizieR On-line Data Catalog: II/328. Originally published in: IPAC/Caltech (2013)

    2013

  8. [16]

    T., Dey, A., et al

    Desai, V., Soifer, B. T., Dey, A., et al. 2009, ApJ, 700, 1190, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/700/2/1190

    2009 doi

  9. [17]

    2009, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Dey, A., & Ndwfs/MIPS Collaboration. 2009, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 408, The Starburst-AGN Connection, ed. W. Wang, Z. Yang, Z. Luo, & Z. Chen, 411, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.0905.4531

    2009 doi arXiv

  10. [18]

    T., Desai, V., et al

    Dey, A., Soifer, B. T., Desai, V., et al. 2008, ApJ, 677, 943, doi: 10.1086/529516

    2008 doi

  11. [19]

    2013, The Messenger, 154, 32

    Edge, A., Sutherland, W., Kuijken, K., et al. 2013, The Messenger, 154, 32

    2013

  12. [20]

    Eisenhardt, P. R. M., Wu, J., Tsai, C.-W., et al. 2012, ApJ, 755, 173, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/755/2/173 Euclid Collaboration, Mellier, Y., Abdurro’uf, et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.13491, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2405.13491

    2012 doi

  13. [21]

    F., Han, Y., & Knudsen, K

    Fan, L., Jones, S. F., Han, Y., & Knudsen, K. K. 2017, PASP, 129, 124101, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aa8e91

    2017 doi

  14. [22]

    1986, ApJ, 303, 336, doi: 10.1086/164079

    Gehrels, N. 1986, ApJ, 303, 336, doi: 10.1086/164079

    1986 doi

  15. [23]

    W., Cuillandre, J.-C., et al

    Gwyn, S., McConnachie, A. W., Cuillandre, J.-C., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.13783. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.13783

    2025 arXiv

  16. [24]

    C., Warren, S

    Hewett, P. C., Warren, S. J., Leggett, S. K., & Hodgkin, S. T. 2006, MNRAS, 367, 454, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09969.x

    2006

  17. [25]

    F., Hernquist, L., Cox, T

    Hopkins, P. F., Hernquist, L., Cox, T. J., & Kereˇ s, D. 2008, ApJS, 175, 356, doi: 10.1086/524362

    2008 doi

  18. [26]

    S., & Geller, M

    Hwang, H. S., & Geller, M. J. 2013, ApJ, 769, 116, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/769/2/116

    2013 doi

  19. [27]

    A., McConnachie, A., Cuillandre, J.-C., et al

    Ibata, R. A., McConnachie, A., Cuillandre, J.-C., et al. 2017, ApJ, 848, 128, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa855c

    2017 doi

  20. [28]

    2014, ApJ, 794, 139, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/794/2/139

    Ichikawa, K., Imanishi, M., Ueda, Y., et al. 2014, ApJ, 794, 139, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/794/2/139

    2014 doi

  21. [29]

    2010, ApJ, 721, 1233, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/721/2/1233

    Onaka, T. 2010, ApJ, 721, 1233, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/721/2/1233

    2010 doi

  22. [30]

    2024, MNRAS, 531, 830, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1191

    Kayal, A., & Singh, V. 2024, MNRAS, 531, 830, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1191

    2024 doi

  23. [31]

    Kormendy, J., & Ho, L. C. 2013, ARA&A, 51, 511, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101811

    2013 doi

  24. [32]

    2015, MNRAS, 454, 3500, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2140

    Kuijken, K., Heymans, C., Hildebrandt, H., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 454, 3500, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2140

    2015 doi

  25. [33]

    2019, A&A, 625, A2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834918

    Kuijken, K., Heymans, C., Dvornik, A., et al. 2019, A&A, 625, A2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834918

    2019 doi

  26. [34]

    2009, A&A, 498, 67, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200811282

    Lanzuisi, G., Piconcelli, E., Fiore, F., et al. 2009, A&A, 498, 67, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200811282

    2009 doi

  27. [35]

    J., Almaini, O., et al

    Lawrence, A., Warren, S. J., Almaini, O., et al. 2007, MNRAS, 379, 1599, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12040.x

    2007

  28. [36]

    J., Tsai, C.-W., et al

    Li, G., Assef, R. J., Tsai, C.-W., et al. 2024, ApJ, 971, 40, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5317

    2024 doi

  29. [37]

    Li, Z., Inayoshi, K., Chen, K., Ichikawa, K., & Ho, L. C. 2025, ApJ, 980, 36, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ada5fb

    2025 doi

  30. [38]

    1998, AJ, 115, 2285, doi: 10.1086/300353

    Magorrian, J., Tremaine, S., Richstone, D., et al. 1998, AJ, 115, 2285, doi: 10.1086/300353

    1998 doi

  31. [39]

    Marconi, A., & Hunt, L. K. 2003, ApJL, 589, L21, doi: 10.1086/375804

    2003 doi

  32. [40]

    P., Brammer, G., et al

    Matthee, J., Naidu, R. P., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, ApJ, 963, 129, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2345

    2024 doi

  33. [41]

    T., Desai, V., et al

    Melbourne, J., Soifer, B. T., Desai, V., et al. 2012, AJ, 143, 125, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/143/5/125

    2012 doi

  34. [42]

    2018, PASJ, 70, S1, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psx063

    Miyazaki, S., Komiyama, Y., Kawanomoto, S., et al. 2018, PASJ, 70, S1, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psx063

    2018 doi

  35. [43]

    C., et al

    Narayanan, D., Dey, A., Hayward, C. C., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 407, 1701, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16997.x

    2010

  36. [44]

    2023, ApJL, 959, L14, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad0e00 13

    Misawa, T. 2023, ApJL, 959, L14, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad0e00 13

    2023 doi

  37. [45]

    2019, ApJ, 876, 132, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1754

    Noboriguchi, A., Nagao, T., Toba, Y., et al. 2019, ApJ, 876, 132, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1754

    2019 doi

  38. [46]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.09180

    Noboriguchi, A., Ichikawa, K., Toba, Y., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.09180. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.09180 P´ erez-Gonz´ alez, P. G., Barro, G., Rieke, G. H., et al. 2024, ApJ, 968, 4, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad38bb

    2025

  39. [47]

    Pierce, J. C. S., Tadhunter, C., Ramos Almeida, C., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 522, 1736, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad455

    2023 doi

  40. [48]

    2007, ApJ, 663, 81, doi: 10.1086/518113

    Polletta, M., Tajer, M., Maraschi, L., et al. 2007, ApJ, 663, 81, doi: 10.1086/518113

    2007 doi

  41. [49]

    Polletta, M. d. C., Wilkes, B. J., Siana, B., et al. 2006, ApJ, 642, 673, doi: 10.1086/500821

    2006 doi

  42. [50]

    S., Dey, A., et al

    Pope, A., Bussmann, R. S., Dey, A., et al. 2008, ApJ, 689, 127, doi: 10.1086/592739

    2008 doi

  43. [51]

    2011, A&A, 534, A81, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201116950

    Riguccini, L., Le Floc’h, E., Ilbert, O., et al. 2011, A&A, 534, A81, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201116950

    2011 doi

  44. [52]

    A., Treister, E., Men´ endez-Delmestre, K., et al

    Riguccini, L. A., Treister, E., Men´ endez-Delmestre, K., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 233, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab16cd

    2019 doi

  45. [53]

    P., Hamann, F., Zakamska, N

    Ross, N. P., Hamann, F., Zakamska, N. L., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 453, 3932, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1710

    2015 doi

  46. [54]

    B., Soifer, B

    Sanders, D. B., Soifer, B. T., Elias, J. H., et al. 1988, ApJ, 325, 74, doi: 10.1086/165983

    1988 doi

  47. [55]

    2022, PASJ, 74, 1157, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psac061

    Suleiman, N., Noboriguchi, A., Toba, Y., et al. 2022, PASJ, 74, 1157, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psac061

    2022 doi

  48. [56]

    2017a, ApJ, 850, 140, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa918a

    Toba, Y., Bae, H.-J., Nagao, T., et al. 2017a, ApJ, 850, 140, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa918a

    doi

  49. [57]

    2016, ApJ, 820, 46, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/820/1/46

    Toba, Y., & Nagao, T. 2016, ApJ, 820, 46, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/820/1/46

    2016 doi

  50. [58]

    2018, ApJ, 857, 31, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aab3cf

    Toba, Y., Ueda, J., Lim, C.-F., et al. 2018, ApJ, 857, 31, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aab3cf

    2018 doi

  51. [59]

    A., et al

    Toba, Y., Nagao, T., Strauss, M. A., et al. 2015, PASJ, 67, 86, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psv057

    2015 doi

  52. [60]

    2017b, ApJ, 835, 36, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/36

    Toba, Y., Nagao, T., Kajisawa, M., et al. 2017b, ApJ, 835, 36, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/36

    doi

  53. [61]

    2020, ApJ, 888, 8, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5718

    Toba, Y., Yamada, S., Ueda, Y., et al. 2020, ApJ, 888, 8, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5718

    2020 doi

  54. [62]

    Tsai, C.-W., Eisenhardt, P. R. M., Wu, J., et al. 2015, ApJ, 805, 90, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/805/2/90

    2015 doi

  55. [63]

    L., Eisenhardt, P

    Wright, E. L., Eisenhardt, P. R. M., Mainzer, A. K., et al. 2010, AJ, 140, 1868, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/1868 —. 2019, AllWISE Source Catalog, NASA IPAC DataSet, IRSA1, doi: 10.26131/IRSA1

    2010 doi

  56. [64]

    2012, ApJ, 756, 96, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/756/1/96

    Wu, J., Tsai, C.-W., Sayers, J., et al. 2012, ApJ, 756, 96, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/756/1/96

    2012 doi

  57. [65]

    G., Adelman, J., Anderson, John E., J., et al

    York, D. G., Adelman, J., Anderson, John E., J., et al. 2000, AJ, 120, 1579, doi: 10.1086/301513

    2000 doi

  58. [66]

    N., Zou, F., et al

    Yu, Z., Brandt, W. N., Zou, F., et al. 2024, ApJ, 977, 210, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8bc0

    2024 doi

  59. [67]

    2022, ApJ, 936, 118, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac87a2

    Yutani, N., Toba, Y., Baba, S., & Wada, K. 2022, ApJ, 936, 118, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac87a2

    2022 doi

  60. [68]

    K., Sugahara, Y., et al

    Zhong, Y., Inoue, A. K., Sugahara, Y., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 529, 4531, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae798

    2024 doi

  61. [69]

    N., Vito, F., et al

    Zou, F., Brandt, W. N., Vito, F., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 499, 1823, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2930

    2020 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.