Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Missing [CII] emission from early galaxies

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.09402 v2 pith:DTO7EGZJ submitted 2020-06-16 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.CO

classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.CO
keywords emissiongalaxieslineextendedoiiialmaearlyluminosity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

ALMA observations have revealed that [CII] 158$\mu$m line emission in high-z galaxies is ~2-3$\times$ more extended than the UV continuum emission. Here we explore whether surface brightness dimming (SBD) of the [CII] line is responsible for the reported [CII] deficit, and the large $L_{\rm [OIII]}/L_{\rm [CII]}$ luminosity ratio measured in early galaxies. We first analyse archival ALMA images of nine z>6 galaxies observed in both [CII] and [OIII]. After performing several uv-tapering experiments to optimize the identification of extended line emission, we detect [CII] emission in the whole sample, with an extent systematically larger than the [CII] emission. Next, we use interferometric simulations to study the effect of SBD on the line luminosity estimate. About 40% of the extended [CII] component might be missed at an angular resolution of 0.8$^{\prime\prime}$, implying that $L_{\rm [CII]}$ is underestimated by a factor $\approx2$ in data at low (<7) signal-to-noise ratio . By combining these results, we conclude that $L_{\rm [CII]}$ of z>6 galaxies lies, on average, slightly below the local $L_{\rm [CII]}-SFR$ relation ($\Delta^{z=6-9}=-0.07\pm0.3$), but within the intrinsic dispersion of the relation. SBD correction also yields $L_{\rm [OIII]}/L_{\rm [CII]}<10$, i.e. more in line with current hydrodynamical simulations.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools