Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 53 references

Broadband Low-loss Unidirectional Reflection On-chip with Asymmetric Dielectric Metasurface

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A passive 2.5-micrometer dielectric metasurface can make a multimode waveguide transmit forward light and reflect backward light by converting the fundamental mode to a first-order mode in the forward direction.

desk verdict A plausible on-chip unidirectional reflection concept with a clean binary-phase mechanism, but the headline efficiencies are simulation-based and the 8 dB measured contrast leaves them unverified. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.06872 v1 pith:DWKYOM5I submitted 2025-06-07 physics.optics

Heijun Jeong , Zeki Hayran , Yuan Liu , Yahui Xiao , Hwaseob Lee , Zi Wang , Jonathan Klamkin , Francesco Monticone
show 1 more author
Tingyi Gu
This is my paper
classification physics.optics PACS 42.82.-m42.79.Dj42.25.Fx
keywords metasurfaceunidirectionalreflectionmodeconversionasymmetrictransmissionintegratedphotonicssiliconnitridediffractiongrating
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to show that a compact dielectric metasurface etched into a multimode waveguide can behave as a unidirectional reflector: light launched in the forward direction passes through with low loss while being converted from the fundamental mode to a first-order mode, and light launched in the backward direction is reflected back with high efficiency. The key design move is longitudinal asymmetry at the unit-cell level, strengthened by a second flipped taper that turns the transmitted phase profile into a square wave with a phase step near pi. At a pi phase step, the zero-order diffraction channel vanishes, so the backward-propagating fundamental mode has no transmission channel and must reflect. The authors report simulations of greater than 80% forward conversion and 90% backward reflection over a 200 nm band in a 2.5-micrometer structure, and experimental demonstrations of asymmetric reflection on silicon and silicon nitride platforms. A sympathetic reader would care because a passive, reciprocal, all-dielectric one-way reflector could suppress backscatter in integrated photonic circuits without magnetic materials or active components.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the double-flipped, bilayer asymmetric taper slot metasurface: two longitudinally offset, oppositely oriented triangular slots in a silicon or silicon nitride waveguide that form a binary phase grating. The mechanism it carries is cancellation of the zero-order diffraction channel: for a square-wave phase profile with unit-cell phase step $\Delta\phi$, the zero-order Fourier coefficient gives $\mathrm{DE}=|C_0|^2=\frac12(1+\cos\Delta\phi)$, which vanishes at $\Delta\phi=\pi$. Eliminating zero-order coupling means the forward fundamental mode has no direct channel, so it converts to the first-order mode; reciprocity then forces the same-mode backward transmission to vanish, leaving reflection. The unit-cell longitudinal asymmetry is what makes the phase step approach $\pi$, and the flipped second layer is what turns the sinusoidal phase into a square wave.

What would settle it

Measure the transmitted phase profile of the fabricated unit cells directly across 1300 to 1600 nm, for example with interferometric wavefront sensing; if the phase step deviates from pi by more than roughly 20 to 30 degrees at the design wavelengths, the predicted zero-order elimination is not happening and the above-80% conversion with 90% back-reflection claim should fail. A complementary check is to measure the forward fundamental-to-first-order conversion efficiency spectrally; values below 80% in the claimed band would disprove the square-wave phase condition.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that breaking mirror symmetry along the propagation direction at the level of a single unit cell, and then flipping the taper to form a two-layer structure, produces an almost ideal asymmetric response in a reciprocal waveguide. In the forward direction, the metasurface's square-wave phase profile converts the incident fundamental mode (Mode A) fully into a first-order diffracted mode (Mode B), suppressing direct fundamental-mode transmission; in the backward direction, the fundamental mode cannot couple across and is reflected in the same mode. The paper expresses this with the scattering matrix of Eq. (5): the ideal reciprocal and lossless matrix has only off-diagonal mode-converting transmission from Port 1 and same-mode reflection at Port 2. The performance claims are greater than 80% conversion efficiency and 90% back-reflection efficiency over a 200 nm wavelength window for a 2.5-micrometer double-flipped taper metasurface, with simulated transmission contrast up to 55 dB and measured reflection contrast up to 8 dB.

Load-bearing premise

The whole effect rests on the fabricated double-flipped unit cell delivering a phase step of nearly pi between its two phase levels across the working band; if fabrication or dispersion shifts that phase step, the zero-order channel is not cancelled and the high contrast collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A 2.5-micrometer double-flipped metasurface can deliver both high forward conversion (above 80%) and high back-reflection (90%) over a 200 nm wavelength range in a passive waveguide.
  • Backscatter from random material nonuniformities or surface roughness can be suppressed from about 50% reflection to below 10% across a 300 nm window when the metasurface is placed in the waveguide.
  • The forward-converted first-order mode needs a step coupler rather than a conventional taper to reach a single-mode output without losing the low-loss advantage; a conventional taper keeps high back-reflection but adds asymmetric loss.
  • Demonstrations on both silicon-on-insulator and silicon nitride show the design transfers across platform index contrasts and fabrication flows, suggesting broad applicability in integrated photonics.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the same zero-order cancellation mechanism should work for other mode pairs and wavelength bands simply by rescaling the lattice constant and taper dimensions, since the condition is purely geometric; the paper does not test this generalization.
  • Editorial inference: the gap between simulated reflection contrast (25 to 55 dB) and measured contrast (8 dB) indicates that the pi phase step is not robustly met in fabricated devices; a practical route would be post-fabrication trimming or active phase tuning, which the paper only hints at through geometric offset compensation.
  • Editorial inference: because the device is passive and reciprocal, it does not violate time-reversal symmetry; the unidirectional behavior is mode-selective rather than direction-selective in an absolute sense, and this distinction matters for any attempt to use it as an isolator.
  • Editorial inference: the design suggests a general strategy for creating apparently nonreciprocal responses from reciprocal components by engineering mode conversion in one direction and reflection in the other, which could extend to mode-division multiplexing systems.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. This manuscript proposes an integrated asymmetric dielectric metasurface in multimode waveguides. The unit cell uses a double-flipped tapered slot geometry to create a binary phase profile that suppresses the zero-order diffraction channel, converting the fundamental mode to a first-order mode in the forward direction while reflecting the fundamental mode under backward excitation. The authors present a Fourier diffraction model, a scattering-matrix formalism for a two-mode two-port system, FDTD optimization of the unit-cell geometry, full-field simulations in SOI and SiN waveguides, and proof-of-concept measurements of asymmetric reflection on SiN. They also show that random-scatterer backscattering can be suppressed by integrating the metasurface.

Significance. If the simulated performance were experimentally realized, the device would be a compact, broadband, passive unidirectional reflector for on-chip multimode waveguides, with potential applications in laser and amplifier isolation and backscatter suppression. The analytical model is standard, the scattering-matrix constraints are correctly derived, and the FDTD simulations appear internally consistent. The inclusion of fabrication-offset studies and measurements on two platforms is a strength. However, the quantitative headline claims are simulation-based; the experimental reflection contrast of up to 8 dB falls far short of the predicted 25–55 dB, and the key phase condition that enables mode conversion is not directly verified in fabricated devices.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; Fig. 4; Table 1] The abstract and conclusions claim >80% forward conversion efficiency and 90% (abstract) or 80% (conclusions) back-reflection over a 200 nm range, but the only experimental quantity reported is the reflection contrast of up to 8 dB in Fig. 4e, which is a differential ratio and not an absolute efficiency. Table 1 lists simulated contrasts of -20 dB to -55 dB, which are not reproduced by the measured 8 dB. The authors should either report calibrated absolute forward/backward transmission and reflection measurements, including error bars, or explicitly restrict the 90%/80% efficiency claims to simulations.
  2. [Results, Eq. (1) and Fig. S2] The mechanism for eliminating the zero-order channel is the binary phase condition Δφ = π in Eq. (1). The only evidence for this phase step is the simulated phase profile in Fig. S2; the fabricated unit cell's phase response is never measured. The tolerance is tight: for a residual zero-order power of -25 dB, |π-Δφ| must be below about 0.11 rad, and for the simulated -55 dB contrast below about 0.035 rad. The measured 8 dB contrast is 17–47 dB below the simulated values, indicating that the phase condition is not robustly met in the fabricated samples. A direct phase characterization, or an explicit quantitative explanation of the discrepancy, is required to support the central claim.
  3. [Fig. S5 vs. Fig. 4e] Fig. S5c states that geometric offsets up to 40 nm keep the backward transmission dip below -35 dB, yet the measured reflection contrast in Fig. 4e for offsets of -40, -20, 0, and +20 nm is at most 8 dB. This two-orders-of-magnitude discrepancy is not discussed. The authors should identify its source—whether it is due to taper/coupler losses, fabrication deviations outside the modeled offset range, or violation of the assumed phase profile—and quantify how the measured contrast relates to the claimed back-reflection efficiency.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Abstract] There are typos in the abstract: 'sup-pression' should be 'suppression' and 'muti-layer' should be 'multi-layer'.
  2. [Conclusions and Table 1] The reported efficiency numbers are inconsistent: the abstract states 90% back-reflection, the conclusions state 80%, and Table 1 reports reflection contrast values of -20 dB to -55 dB. These should be harmonized.
  3. [Results, Eq. (1)–(2)] Equations (1) and (2) assume a perfectly binary phase profile with equal-width half-periods; this assumption should be stated explicitly, and the sensitivity of the contrast to duty-cycle variations should be quantified.
  4. [Methods, Ref. [35]] The text states 'More details ... are provided in our previous work [35]', but Ref. [35] is by Ha et al. and does not appear to be previous work of the present authors; this citation attribution should be corrected.
  5. [Fig. 3d–e] It is unclear from the figure and text whether the measured transmission and reflection curves in Fig. 3 are from the SOI or SiN platform, and whether they are absolute or normalized; error bars are not shown.
  6. [Terminology throughout] The terms 'metasurface' and 'metalens' are used interchangeably in several places; the manuscript should use consistent terminology for the reported device.
  7. [Results, 'no backward transmission'] The statement that 'no backward transmission occurs due to the absence of the zero-order mode in both transmissions' is ambiguous; it should specify that this applies to the fundamental-mode channel only, since Eq. (5) does allow backward transmission of Mode B.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the analytical binary-phase grating model is an independent Fourier-optics result, not a fit to the device, and the self-citations are background/fabrication references that do not carry the central claim.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. The design is obtained by FDTD parameter sweeps (Figs. S1, S3), and the analytical description in Eqs. (1)-(2) is the standard Fourier-optics diffraction efficiency for a square-wave phase profile: DE = |C0|^2 = (1+cos Δφ)/2. This equation is not fitted to the device and does not depend on the optimization; the statement that the zero-order channel vanishes at Δφ = π is a mathematical consequence of the model and is checked against an independently simulated phase profile (Fig. S2b). The scattering-matrix discussion (Eqs. 3-5) is standard reciprocity formalism, and the ideal matrix in Eq. (5) is presented as a theoretical target, not as a fitted or predicted result. Citations involving current authors (e.g., references [40] and [46]) are used for background applications or fabrication practice, not as evidence for the physical mechanism; therefore they are not load-bearing and do not make the argument circular. The gap between simulated transmission contrast (25-55 dB) and measured reflection contrast (8 dB) is a robustness/experimental-support concern, not circularity: the measurements are independent of the simulation inputs. No parameter fitted to a subset of data is renamed as a prediction, and no equation is equivalent to an input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim relies on standard electromagnetic reciprocity, Fourier grating theory, and a simulated binary phase condition; no new physical entities are introduced. The main free parameters are the optimized unit-cell geometries, which were tuned with FDTD sweeps rather than derived from first principles.

free parameters (6)
  • lattice constant = 800 nm
    Fixed design choice for unit cell periodicity in FDTD simulations; not derived from first principles.
  • larger taper width Wm = 0.30 um
    Chosen from parametric sweeps to maximize transmission contrast (Results, page 5).
  • smaller taper width Wn = 0.15 um
    Chosen from parametric sweeps (Fig. S3).
  • inter-taper gap G = 0.46 um
    Most sensitive parameter for back reflection; optimized near 1.48 um wavelength.
  • taper lengths L1 and L2 = not stated precisely
    Parameterized in Fig. S3; the ratio L1/L2 controls phase modulation and asymmetry.
  • fabrication offset = 20 nm (selected)
    Device variant with 20 nm geometric offsets chosen because it gave lowest insertion loss and about 8 dB contrast on silicon nitride.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Scattering matrix reciprocity S = S^T for the multimode two-port system
    Used to derive the ideal asymmetric response matrix (Eqs. 3-5); standard electromagnetic reciprocity in linear passive media.
  • standard math Fourier diffraction efficiency formula for sinusoidal and binary phase gratings
    Used to claim zero-order mode elimination at delta-phi = pi (Eqs. 1-2); standard Fourier optics.
  • domain assumption The fabricated double-flipped structure produces an approximately ideal square-wave phase profile
    Central mechanism; Fig. S2 shows a simulated phase, but the experimental phase is not directly measured.
  • domain assumption 2D periodic unit-cell FDTD with plane-wave excitation represents the 3D multimode waveguide response
    Design optimization is performed in 2D and transferred to 3D devices; the discrepancy is not quantified.
  • domain assumption FDTD simulations accurately capture loss and scattering
    All performance numbers are simulation-based unless stated otherwise.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Broadband Low-loss Unidirectional Reflection On-chip with Asymmetric Dielectric Metasurface." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DWKYOM5I

@misc{pith2026250606872,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Broadband Low-loss Unidirectional Reflection On-chip with Asymmetric Dielectric Metasurface},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DWKYOM5I}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.06872}
}
read the original abstract

Metasurface has emerged as a powerful platform for controlling light at subwavelength thickness, enabling new functionalities for imaging, polarization manipulation, and angular momentum conversion within a flat surface. We explored an integrated asymmetric metasurface simultaneously achieving broadband, low loss forward power transmission, and significant back reflection sup-pression in multi-mode waveguides. The tapering along the direction of light propagation leads to low loss and space-efficient mode conversion. Enhanced by a double-flipped structure, a thin (2.5 micrometer) metasurface can simultaneously achieve high conversion efficiency (>80 percent), and back-reflection efficiency of 90 percent over a 200 nm wavelength range. Such single sided reflectors can be one of the enabling components for gain-integrated adaptive optics on a chip.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.06872 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Geometric optimization for high forward transmission and backward reflection [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Momentum and mode conversions. (a) Mode momentum conversion analysis with forward (left) and back (right) excitations of guided modes towards the double-flipped asymmetric metasurface defined in the SOI substrates. Insets: electric field distribution in a unit cell with for￾ward and backward excitation. (b) Correspondent transmission matrix for the dual modes (mode A and B are for zero and first-order diffraction gi… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Devices implementation. (a) Scanning electron microscope image of the asymmetric metasurface-based metalens and grating coupler (scale bar: 2 μm). Right-inset zoom-in image of the detailed structure, with a critical dimension of 47 nm (scale bar: 500 nm). (b) Optical field intensity along the monitors across the metasurface (marked in c), with forward and backward excitations. (c) Top view of the asymmetric metasurf… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M. Liu, C. Zhao, Y . Zeng, Y . Chen, C. Zhao, C. W. Qiu, Evolution and Nonreciprocity of Loss-Induced Topological Phase Singularity Pairs, Phys Rev Lett 2021, 127, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.266101. 14

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.266101 2021

  2. [2]

    Mikheeva, R

    E. Mikheeva, R. Colom, K. Achouri, A. Overvig, F. Binkowski, J.-Y . Duboz, S. Cueff, S. Fan, S. Burger, A. Alù, P. Genevet, Asymmetric phase modulation of light with parity- symmetry broken metasurfaces, Optica 2023, 10, 1287

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Shastri, F

    K. Shastri, F. Monticone, Nonlocal flat optics, Nat Photonics 2023, 17, 36

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    Z. L. Deng, F. J. Li, H. Li, X. Li, A. Alù, Extreme Diffraction Control in Metagratings Leveraging Bound States in the Continuum and Exceptional Points, Laser Photon Rev 2022, 16, DOI 10.1002/lpor.202100617

    work page doi:10.1002/lpor.202100617 2022

  5. [5]

    N. Yu, P. Genevet, M. A. Kats, F. Aieta, J.-P. Tetienne, F. Capasso, Z. Gaburro, Light Prop- agation with Phase Discontinuities: Generalized Laws of Reflection and Refraction, Sci- ence (1979) 2011, 334, 333

    work page 1979

  6. [6]

    Hayran, A

    Z. Hayran, A. Chen, F. Monticone, Spectral causality and the scattering of waves, Optica 2021, 8, 1040

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    J. H. Park, A. Ndao, W. Cai, L. Hsu, A. Kodigala, T. Lepetit, Y . H. Lo, B. Kanté, Sym- metry-breaking-induced plasmonic exceptional points and nanoscale sensing, Nat Phys 2020, 16, 462

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    S. Dong, G. Hu, Q. Wang, Y . Jia, Q. Zhang, G. Cao, J. Wang, S. Chen, D. Fan, W. Jiang, Y . Li, A. Alù, C. W. Qiu, Loss-Assisted Metasurface at an Exceptional Point, ACS Photonics 2020, 7, 3321

    work page 2020

Show all 53 references
  1. [9]

    Y . Zeng, G. Hu, K. Liu, Z. Tang, C. W. Qiu, Dynamics of Topological Polarization Singu- larity in Momentum Space, Phys Rev Lett 2021, 127, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.176101

    2021 doi

  2. [10]

    W. Liu, B. Wang, Y . Zhang, J. Wang, M. Zhao, F. Guan, X. Liu, L. Shi, J. Zi, Circularly polarized states spawning from bound states in the continuum, Phys Rev Lett 2019, 123, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.116104

    2019 doi

  3. [11]

    H. Qin, Z. Su, M. Liu, Y . Zeng, M. C. Tang, M. Li, Y . Shi, W. Huang, C. W. Qiu, Q. Song, Arbitrarily polarized bound states in the continuum with twisted photonic crystal slabs, Light Sci Appl 2023, 12, DOI 10.1038/s41377-023-01090-w

    2023 doi

  4. [12]

    P. Wang, Y . Zheng, X. Chen, C. Huang, Y . V . Kartashov, L. Torner, V . V . Konotop, F. Ye, Localization and delocalization of light in photonic moiré lattices, Nature 2020, 577, 42

    2020

  5. [13]

    D. X. Nguyen, X. Letartre, E. Drouard, P. Viktorovitch, H. C. Nguyen, H. S. Nguyen, Magic configurations in moiré superlattice of bilayer photonic crystals: Almost-perfect flatbands and unconventional localization, Phys Rev Res 2022, 4, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.L032031. 15

    2022 doi

  6. [14]

    S. Yves, E. Galiffi, X. Ni, E. M. Renzi, A. Alù, Twist-Induced Hyperbolic Shear Metasur- faces, Phys Rev X 2024, 14, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevX.14.021031

    2024 doi

  7. [15]

    Cheng, C

    X. Cheng, C. Jouvaud, X. Ni, S. H. Mousavi, A. Z. Genack, A. B. Khanikaev, Robust re- configurable electromagnetic pathways within a photonic topological insulator, Nat Mater 2016, 15, 542

    2016

  8. [16]

    Cheng, E

    W. Cheng, E. Prodan, C. Prodan, Experimental Demonstration of Dynamic Topological Pumping across Incommensurate Bilayered Acoustic Metamaterials, Phys Rev Lett 2020, 125, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.224301

    2020 doi

  9. [17]

    X. Ni, K. Chen, M. Weiner, D. J. Apigo, C. Prodan, A. Alù, E. Prodan, A. B. Khanikaev, Observation of Hofstadter butterfly and topological edge states in reconfigurable quasi- periodic acoustic crystals, Commun Phys 2019, 2, DOI 10.1038/s42005-019-0151-7

    2019 doi

  10. [18]

    Koshelev, S

    K. Koshelev, S. Lepeshov, M. Liu, A. Bogdanov, Y . Kivshar, Asymmetric Metasurfaces with High- Q Resonances Governed by Bound States in the Continuum, Phys Rev Lett 2018, 121, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.193903

    2018 doi

  11. [19]

    Koshelev, S

    K. Koshelev, S. Kruk, E. Melik-Gaykazyan, J.-H. Choi, A. Bogdanov, H.-G. Park, Y . Kivshar, Subwavelength dielectric resonators for nonlinear nanophotonics, Science (1979) 2020, 367, 288

    1979

  12. [20]

    S. Li, C. Zhou, T. Liu, S. Xiao, Symmetry-protected bound states in the continuum sup- ported by all-dielectric metasurfaces, Phys Rev A (Coll Park) 2019, 100, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevA.100.063803

    2019 doi

  13. [21]

    L. Cong, R. Singh, Symmetry-Protected Dual Bound States in the Continuum in Met- amaterials, Adv Opt Mater 2019, 7, DOI 10.1002/adom.201900383

    2019 doi

  14. [22]

    H. Qin, Z. Su, Z. Zhang, W. Lv, Z. Yang, W. Chen, X. Gao, H. Wei, Y . Shi, B. Li, J. Zhou, R. Fleury, C. W. Qiu, Q. Song, Disorder-assisted real–momentum topological photonic crystal, Nature 2025, DOI 10.1038/s41586-025-08632-9

    2025 doi

  15. [23]

    Z. Yang, P. S. Huang, Y . T. Lin, H. Qin, J. Zúñiga-Pérez, Y . Shi, Z. Wang, X. Cheng, M. C. Tang, S. Han, B. Kanté, B. Li, P. C. Wu, P. Genevet, Q. Song, Creating pairs of excep- tional points for arbitrary polarization control: asymmetric vectorial wavefront modula- tion, Na...

    2024 doi

  16. [24]

    Arbabi, Y

    A. Arbabi, Y . Horie, M. Bagheri, A. Faraon, Dielectric metasurfaces for complete control of phase and polarization with subwavelength spatial resolution and high transmission, Nat Nanotechnol 2015, 10, 937

    2015

  17. [25]

    R. C. Devlin, A. Ambrosio, N. A. Rubin, J. P. B. Mueller, F. Capasso, Arbitrary spin-to- orbital angular momentum conversion of light, Science (1979) 2017, 358, 896. 16

    1979

  18. [26]

    E. Yao, Z. Su, Y . Bi, Y . Wang, L. Huang, Tunable quasi-bound states in the continuum in magneto-optical metasurfaces, J Phys D Appl Phys 2024, 57, DOI 10.1088/1361- 6463/ad5215

    2024 doi

  19. [27]

    W. Lv, H. Qin, Z. Su, C. Zhang, J. Huang, Y . Shi, B. Li, P. Genevet, Q. Song, Robust gen- eration of intrinsic C points with magneto-optical bound states in the continuum, Sci Adv 2024, 10, 157

    2024

  20. [28]

    H. Chu, X. Xiong, N. X. Fang, F. Wu, R. Jia, R. Peng, M. Wang, Y . Lai, Transparent matte surfaces enabled by asymmetric diffusion of white light, arXiv:2303.12333 2023

    2023 arXiv

  21. [29]

    J. W. Cho, Y . J. Lee, J. H. Kim, R. Hu, E. Lee, S. K. Kim, Directional Radiative Cooling via Exceptional Epsilon-Based Microcavities, ACS Nano 2023, 17, 10442

    2023

  22. [31]

    H. Wang, Y . Zuo, X. Yin, Z. Chen, Z. Zhang, F. Wang, Y . Hu, X. Zhang, C. Peng, Ul- tralow-loss optical interconnect enabled by topological unidirectional guided resonance, Sci Adv 2024, 10, 4372

    2024

  23. [32]

    Z. Li, M. H. Kim, C. Wang, Z. Han, S. Shrestha, A. C. Overvig, M. Lu, A. Stein, A. M. Agarwal, M. Lončar, N. Yu, Controlling propagation and coupling of waveguide modes using phase-gradient metasurfaces, Nat Nanotechnol 2017, 12, 675

    2017

  24. [33]

    López-Tejeira, S

    F. López-Tejeira, S. G. Rodrigo, L. Martín-Moreno, F. J. García-Vidal, E. Devaux, T. W. Ebbesen, J. R. Krenn, I. P. Radko, S. I. Bozhevolnyi, M. U. González, J. C. Weeber, A. Dereux, Efficient unidirectional nanoslit couplers for surface plasmons, Nat Phys 2007, 3, 324

    2007

  25. [34]

    J. Lin, J. P. B. Mueller, Q. Wang, G. Yuan, N. Antoniou, X.-C. Yuan, F. Capasso, Polariza- tion-Controlled Tunable Directional Coupling of Surface Plasmon Polaritons, Science (1979) 2013, 340, 331

    1979

  26. [35]

    Y . Ha, L. Wang, Y . Guo, M. Pu, F. Zou, X. Li, Y . Fan, X. Ma, X. Luo, High-fidelity mode scaling via topological-optimized on-chip metalens for compact photonic interconnection, Light: Advanced Manufacturing 2023, 4, 222

    2023

  27. [36]

    H. Qi, Z. Du, X. Hu, J. Yang, S. Chu, Q. Gong, High performance integrated photonic cir- cuit based on inverse design method, Opto-Electronic Advances 2022, 5, DOI 10.29026/oea.2022.210061

    2022

  28. [37]

    C. Ropp, W. Zhu, A. Yulaev, D. Westly, G. Simelgor, A. Rakholia, W. Lunden, D. Sheredy, M. M. Boyd, S. Papp, A. Agrawal, V . Aksyuk, Integrating planar photonics for multi-beam 17 generation and atomic clock packaging on chip, Light Sci Appl 2023, 12, DOI 10.1038/s41377-023-01081-x

    2023 doi

  29. [38]

    J. T. Merrill, C. V olin, D. Landgren, J. M. Amini, K. Wright, S. C. Doret, C. S. Pai, H. Hayden, T. Killian, D. Faircloth, K. R. Brown, A. W. Harter, R. E. Slusher, Demonstration of integrated microscale optics in surface-electrode ion traps, New J Phys 2011, 13, DOI 10.1088/...

    2011 doi

  30. [39]

    Woods, T

    D. Woods, T. J. Naughton, Optical computing: Photonic neural networks, Nat Phys 2012, 8, 257

    2012

  31. [40]

    Z. Wang, L. Chang, F. Wang, T. Li, T. Gu, , Integrated photonic metasystem for image classifications at telecommunication wavelength, Nat Commun 2022, 13, DOI 10.1038/s41467-022-29856-7

    2022 doi

  32. [41]

    G. J. Schneider, J. A. Murakowski, C. A. Schuetz, S. Shi, D. W. Prather, Radiofrequency signal-generation system with over seven octaves of continuous tuning, Nat Photonics 2013, 7, 118

    2013

  33. [42]

    S. Gao, M. del Mar Sánchez-López, I. Moreno, Experimental implementation of phase triplicator gratings in a spatial light modulator, Chinese Optics Letters 2024, 22, 020501

    2024

  34. [43]

    J. E. Harvey, R. N. Pfisterer, Understanding diffraction grating behavior: including conical diffraction and Rayleigh anomalies from transmission gratings, Optical Engineering 2019, 58, 1

    2019

  35. [44]

    Joseph Goodman, Introduction to Fourier Optics, Roberts & Company, 2005

    2005

  36. [45]

    Caloz, A

    C. Caloz, A. Alù, S. Tretyakov, D. Sounas, K. Achouri, Z. L. Deck-Léger, Electromagnetic Nonreciprocity, Phys Rev Appl 2018, 10, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.10.047001

    2018 doi

  37. [46]

    H. Lee, A. Kecebas, F. Wang, L. Chang, S. K. Özdemir, T. Gu, Chiral exceptional point and coherent suppression of backscattering in silicon microring with low loss Mie scat- terer, eLight 2023, 3, DOI 10.1186/s43593-023-00043-5

    2023 doi

  38. [47]

    Engelberg, U

    J. Engelberg, U. Levy, Optimizing the spectral range of diffractive metalenses for poly- chromatic imaging applications, Opt Express 2017, 25, 21637

    2017

  39. [48]

    G. Kim, Y . Kim, J. Yun, S. W. Moon, S. Kim, J. Kim, J. Park, T. Badloe, I. Kim, J. Rho, Metasurface-driven full-space structured light for three-dimensional imaging, Nat Com- mun 2022, 13, DOI 10.1038/s41467-022-32117-2

    2022 doi

  40. [49]

    W. Liu, H. Cheng, J. Tian, S. Chen, Diffractive metalens: from fundamentals, practical ap- plications to current trends, Adv Phys X 2020, 5, DOI 10.1080/23746149.2020.1742584. 18

    2020

  41. [50]

    R. Liu, W. Zhao, D. Dai, Achromatic Silicon Photonic Waveguide Lenses for Ultra-Broad- band Multimode Spot-Size Conversion, Laser Photon Rev 2024, DOI 10.1002/lpor.202301194

    2024 doi

  42. [51]

    Ohana, B

    D. Ohana, B. Desiatov, N. Mazurski, U. Levy, Dielectric Metasurface as a Platform for Spatial Mode Conversion in Nanoscale Waveguides, Nano Lett 2016, 16, 7956

    2016

  43. [52]

    X. Yin, J. Jin, M. Soljačić, C. Peng, B. Zhen, Observation of topologically enabled unidi- rectional guided resonances, Nature 2020, 580, 467

    2020

  44. [53]

    H. Wang, Y . Zhang, Y . He, Q. Zhu, L. Sun, Y . Su, Compact Silicon Waveguide Mode Con- verter Employing Dielectric Metasurface Structure, Adv Opt Mater 2019, 7, DOI 10.1002/adom.201801191

    2019 doi

  45. [54]

    Pascar, D.-X

    L. Pascar, D.-X. Xu, Y . Grinberg, S. Sajjanam Morrison, M. Vachon, O. Liboiron-Ladou- ceur, Ultra-short and highly efficient metamaterial Fresnel lens-assisted taper, Opt Express 2024, 32, 28522. Figures 19 Figure 1. Geometric optimization for high forward transmission and ba...

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.