pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.16808 · v1 · pith:DWLYCGL6new · submitted 2026-05-16 · 💰 econ.GN · q-fin.EC

Dissipation of Debt Financing Privilege on Corporate AI Washing: Evidence from China

Congluo Xu , Jiuyue Liu , Xiangsheng Zheng , Ziyang Li This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 19:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💰 econ.GN q-fin.EC
keywords AI washingdebt financing costspolicy shockChinadifference-in-differencescorporate disclosureinnovation subsidy
0
0 comments X

The pith

Chinese firms that overstate AI activities face higher debt costs after the 14th Five-Year Plan

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This study asks whether policy shocks that promote AI lead debt markets to punish firms for overstating their AI involvement. The authors measure AI washing as the excess of AI mentions in disclosures over actual AI patents granted. They treat the release of China's 14th Five Year Plan as an exogenous increase in AI policy focus and compare financing costs before and after for washing versus non-washing firms. Difference-in-differences results indicate a 12.5 basis point rise in debt costs for the washing group. The measure is externally validated by showing that these firms extract more subsidies and commit more violations later.

Core claim

Difference in differences estimations reveal that AI washing firms experience a 12.5 basis point relative increase in debt financing cost afterward, where AI washing is identified through the residual between AI narrative intensity and patent output, and validated as strategic deception by subsidy extraction and future regulatory violations.

What carries the argument

The residual between AI narrative intensity and patent output as a proxy for AI washing.

If this is right

  • Joint estimation confirms simultaneous adjustments across financing and innovation margins.
  • Management shareholding and analyst attention amplify the penalty on AI washing firms.
  • Supply chain concentration and bank proximity attenuate the penalty.
  • Results remain robust across multiple specification checks.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The mechanism suggests that debt investors respond to signals of corporate exaggeration when governments announce technology priorities.
  • Similar narrative-patent gaps could be tested in other policy-supported fields to see if debt costs adjust similarly.
  • The findings point to a potential role for disclosure scrutiny in emerging markets to complement regulatory enforcement.

Load-bearing premise

The residual between AI narrative intensity and patent output validly captures strategic deception rather than benign ambition, as confirmed by external validation through subsidy extraction and future regulatory violations.

What would settle it

A concrete falsifier would be the absence of a significant positive difference-in-differences coefficient for debt financing costs when comparing AI washing firms to others after the policy announcement, or if the external validation correlations with subsidies and violations fail to hold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.16808 by Congluo Xu, Jiuyue Liu, Xiangsheng Zheng, Ziyang Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Line graphs of Trends in Debt Financing Cost by Treatment Status [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Covariate Balance Diagnostics of PSM and EB [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Parallel Trend Test The DID identification strategy requires parallel pretreatment trends in debt financing cost between treatment and control groups. We test this assumption using the event-study specification in Equation 4 where T = {−4, −3, −2, 0, 1, 2, 3} denotes event-time indicators relative to the 2021 policy announcement and τ = −1 serves as the omitted reference period. The coefficients βτ capture… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Placebo Permutation Test 4.4.4 Industry Subsamples and Alternative Treatment Indicators To verify that the baseline findings are not sensitive to sample composition or the specific measurement approach used to identify AI washing, we conduct two sets of robustness checks. First, we exclude firms in CSRC Sector I (Information transmission, software and information technology services), which encompasses tel… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Parallel Trend Test (Drop Sample of 2020) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The rapid development of artificial intelligence motivates firms to engage in AI washing. This study examines whether strategic policy shocks increase debt financing costs for such firms. Leveraging China's 14th Five Year Plan as a quasi natural experiment, we identify AI washing through the residual between AI narrative intensity and patent output. External validation confirms this decoupling reflects strategic deception evidenced by subsidy extraction and future regulatory violations rather than benign ambition, supporting its validity as an AI washing proxy. Difference in differences estimations reveal that AI washing firms experience a 12.5 basis point relative increase in debt financing cost afterward. Joint estimation confirms simultaneous adjustments across financing and innovation margins. Management shareholding and analyst attention amplify the penalty while supply chain concentration and bank proximity attenuate it. Results remain robust across checks. Our findings illuminate how macro level policy shocks activate market discipline in emerging market debt markets.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies whether AI washing by Chinese firms leads to higher debt financing costs following the 14th Five-Year Plan as a policy shock. AI washing is proxied by the residual from regressing AI narrative intensity on patent output; this proxy is externally validated via links to subsidy extraction and future regulatory violations. A difference-in-differences design estimates a 12.5 basis point relative increase in debt costs for AI-washing firms post-plan. The paper also reports joint adjustments on financing and innovation margins and examines moderators (management shareholding and analyst attention amplify the effect; supply chain concentration and bank proximity attenuate it), with claims of robustness across checks.

Significance. If the residual-based proxy correctly isolates strategic deception, the results would show that macro policy shocks can trigger market discipline on misleading innovation claims in emerging-market debt markets, with implications for corporate disclosure and innovation policy. The joint estimation of financing and innovation responses and the moderator analysis would add useful nuance to the literature on information asymmetry and financing costs.

major comments (2)
  1. The central identification rests on the AI-washing proxy defined as the residual from the regression of AI narrative intensity on patent output. This construction risks conflating strategic deception with benign factors such as longer patent gestation lags, industry-specific non-patent IP strategies, or measurement error in narrative intensity. The external validation via subsidy extraction and future violations may be mechanically correlated with the same residual, leaving open whether the treatment indicator is misclassified and the DiD coefficient unidentified. A direct test (e.g., placebo on pre-trends or alternative proxies) is needed to establish that the residual isolates deception rather than unmeasured heterogeneity.
  2. The DiD specification and parallel-trends assumption are load-bearing for the 12.5 bp cost-increase claim. Without reported pre-trend tests, event-study coefficients, or explicit checks for differential trends between high-residual and low-residual firms around the 14th Five-Year Plan announcement, it is unclear whether the post-plan divergence can be attributed to the policy shock rather than pre-existing differences or concurrent events.
minor comments (2)
  1. Clarify the exact functional form and controls used in the first-stage residual regression (narrative intensity on patents) and whether industry-year fixed effects or other covariates are included, as these choices directly affect the treatment variable.
  2. The abstract and main text should explicitly state the sample period, number of firms, and data sources for narrative intensity (e.g., annual reports) and patent counts to allow readers to assess generalizability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments, which help clarify the identification strategy and strengthen the empirical design. We respond to each major comment below and commit to revisions that directly address the concerns raised.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central identification rests on the AI-washing proxy defined as the residual from the regression of AI narrative intensity on patent output. This construction risks conflating strategic deception with benign factors such as longer patent gestation lags, industry-specific non-patent IP strategies, or measurement error in narrative intensity. The external validation via subsidy extraction and future violations may be mechanically correlated with the same residual, leaving open whether the treatment indicator is misclassified and the DiD coefficient unidentified. A direct test (e.g., placebo on pre-trends or alternative proxies) is needed to establish that the residual isolates deception rather than unmeasured heterogeneity.

    Authors: We acknowledge the referee's valid concern that the residual proxy could partly reflect benign heterogeneity such as patent lags or measurement issues rather than deception alone. Our external validation links high residuals specifically to subsidy extraction and future regulatory violations, outcomes that are more consistent with strategic behavior than with industry-specific IP choices or simple measurement error. Nevertheless, to provide a more direct test of the proxy's ability to isolate deception, we will add placebo exercises using pre-plan periods and alternative textual proxies (e.g., stricter keyword sets or topic-model-based measures) in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The DiD specification and parallel-trends assumption are load-bearing for the 12.5 bp cost-increase claim. Without reported pre-trend tests, event-study coefficients, or explicit checks for differential trends between high-residual and low-residual firms around the 14th Five-Year Plan announcement, it is unclear whether the post-plan divergence can be attributed to the policy shock rather than pre-existing differences or concurrent events.

    Authors: We agree that explicit verification of parallel trends is essential for credible DiD inference. While the manuscript reports a range of robustness checks, we did not include formal pre-trend tests or event-study coefficients. We will add these in the revision, including an event-study specification with leads and lags around the 14th Five-Year Plan announcement to demonstrate the absence of differential pre-trends and the timing of the post-plan divergence. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in empirical DiD derivation

full rationale

The paper constructs an AI-washing proxy as the residual from regressing narrative intensity on patent output and then applies a standard difference-in-differences design around the 14th Five-Year Plan shock to estimate its effect on debt financing costs. The outcome variable (debt cost) is measured independently of the proxy construction, the identification strategy relies on policy timing rather than the residual itself, and external validations (subsidy extraction, future violations) are presented as separate checks rather than definitional inputs. No equation reduces to another by construction, no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction of the target result, and no self-citation chain bears the central claim. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Central claim rests on exogeneity of the policy shock for identification and on the residual proxy accurately isolating deception; both are domain assumptions rather than derived results.

free parameters (1)
  • AI narrative intensity regression residual
    Proxy for AI washing is constructed as the residual from regressing narrative intensity on patent output, making it data-fitted by definition.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption China's 14th Five Year Plan constitutes an exogenous quasi-natural experiment that differentially affects AI washing firms
    Invoked to justify the difference-in-differences design in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5679 in / 1327 out tokens · 47829 ms · 2026-05-19T19:50:02.480333+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

113 extracted references · 113 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Management Science , volume=

    Does transparency stifle or facilitate innovation? , author=. Management Science , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    Applied Economics Letters , pages=

    The illusion of AI: how AI washing impedes green technology innovation , author=. Applied Economics Letters , pages=. 2026 , publisher=

    work page 2026

  3. [3]

    Finance Research Letters , pages=

    AI Washing: Strategic Disclosure and Backlash , author=. Finance Research Letters , pages=. 2026 , publisher=

    work page 2026

  4. [4]

    Journal of Business Research , volume=

    Contractual arrangements and information consistency: How ESG executive compensation incentives affect corporate AI disclosure , author=. Journal of Business Research , volume=. 2026 , publisher=

    work page 2026

  5. [5]

    Organizational Dynamics , volume=

    CSR and sustainability in emerging markets: Societal, institutional, and organizational influences , author=. Organizational Dynamics , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    Journal of World Business , volume=

    The social responsibility of international business: From ethics and the environment to CSR and sustainable development , author=. Journal of World Business , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    Business Strategy and the Environment , volume=

    Cross-national differences in stakeholder management: Applying institutional theory and comparative capitalism framework , author=. Business Strategy and the Environment , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Journal of Business Ethics , volume=

    Corporate Sincerity: Accommodation, Reputation Washing, and Moral Credit: GJ Rozeboom , author=. Journal of Business Ethics , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    work page 2025

  9. [9]

    Journal of Business Ethics , volume=

    CSR-washing is rare: A conceptual framework, literature review, and critique , author=. Journal of Business Ethics , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    work page 2016

  10. [10]

    Academy of Management Journal , volume=

    Faking it or muddling through? Understanding decoupling in response to stakeholder pressures , author=. Academy of Management Journal , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    work page 2012

  11. [11]

    Journal of Management Studies , volume=

    Stigma as moral insurance: How stigma buffers firms from the market consequences of greenwashing , author=. Journal of Management Studies , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    Journal of Accounting Literature , volume=

    Greenwashing and sustainability assurance: a review and call for future research , author=. Journal of Accounting Literature , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    Journal of Business Economics and Management , volume=

    Greenwashing behaviours: Causes, taxonomy and consequences based on a systematic literature review , author=. Journal of Business Economics and Management , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    Journal of Business Venturing , volume=

    Environment, corporate entrepreneurship, and financial performance: A taxonomic approach , author=. Journal of Business Venturing , volume=. 1993 , publisher=

    work page 1993

  15. [15]

    Academy of Management Perspectives , volume=

    Corporate governance for responsible innovation: Approaches to corporate governance and their implications for sustainable development , author=. Academy of Management Perspectives , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    Business Strategy and the Environment , volume=

    How can China's sustainable development be damaged in consequence of financial misallocation? Analysis from the perspective of regional innovation capability , author=. Business Strategy and the Environment , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    Finance Research Letters , pages=

    The Impact of AI Washing on Enterprises’ Access to Bank Loans: From the Perspective of External Governance , author=. Finance Research Letters , pages=. 2026 , publisher=

    work page 2026

  18. [18]

    Technological Forecasting and Social Change , volume=

    Unveiling AI washing: Bridging corporate technological gaps through a cognitive dissonance lens , author=. Technological Forecasting and Social Change , volume=. 2026 , publisher=

    work page 2026

  19. [19]

    Journal of Business Ethics , volume=

    Gray shades of green: Causes and consequences of green skepticism , author=. Journal of Business Ethics , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    work page 2017

  20. [20]

    Business Strategy and the Environment , volume=

    Greenwashing and environmental communication: Effects on stakeholders' perceptions , author=. Business Strategy and the Environment , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    Journal of Business Ethics , volume=

    Punishment by securities regulators, corporate social responsibility and the cost of debt , author=. Journal of Business Ethics , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    Energy Economics , volume=

    The capital market responses to new energy vehicle (NEV) subsidies: An event study on China , author=. Energy Economics , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    Organization Science , volume=

    Scrutiny, norms, and selective disclosure: A global study of greenwashing , author=. Organization Science , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    work page 2016

  24. [24]

    The Journal of Technology Transfer , volume=

    Adverse selection and financing of innovation: is there a need for R&D subsidies? , author=. The Journal of Technology Transfer , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

    work page 2010

  25. [25]

    Organization Science , volume=

    Capital structure in transition: The transformation of financial strategies in China's emerging economy , author=. Organization Science , volume=. 2004 , publisher=

    work page 2004

  26. [26]

    The Review of Financial Studies , volume=

    Credit allocation under economic stimulus: Evidence from China , author=. The Review of Financial Studies , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    work page 2019

  27. [27]

    Technological Forecasting and Social Change , volume=

    Public attention and investment efficiency: Incentive effect or deterrent effect? Analysis on heterogeneous bilateral stochastic frontier model , author=. Technological Forecasting and Social Change , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    work page 2022

  28. [28]

    Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies , volume=

    China’s new growth story: Linking the 14th Five-Year Plan with the 2060 carbon neutrality pledge , author=. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    work page 2060

  29. [29]

    The Accounting Review , volume=

    Narrative disclosure and earnings performance: Evidence from R&D disclosures , author=. The Accounting Review , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    work page 2014

  30. [30]

    Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , volume=

    Does political uncertainty increase external financing costs? Measuring the electoral premium in syndicated lending , author=. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    work page 2019

  31. [31]

    rationing in credit markets with imperfect information , author=

    Screening vs. rationing in credit markets with imperfect information , author=. The American Economic Review , volume=. 1985 , publisher=

    work page 1985

  32. [32]

    Journal of Business Finance & Accounting , year=

    A positive theory of information for debt contracting: Implications for financial reporting , author=. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting , year=

    work page

  33. [33]

    The Accounting Review , volume=

    The association between technological conditions and the market value of equity , author=. The Accounting Review , volume=. 2008 , doi=

    work page 2008

  34. [34]

    IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management , volume=

    R&D investment and debt financing of high-tech firms in emerging economies: The role of patents and state ownership , author=. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    work page 2022

  35. [35]

    Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility , volume=

    Measuring machinewashing under the corporate digital responsibility theory: A proposal for a methodological path , author=. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    Journal of Business Ethics , volume=

    From greenwashing to machinewashing: A model and future directions derived from reasoning by analogy , author=. Journal of Business Ethics , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    work page 2022

  37. [37]

    American Journal of Sociology , volume=

    Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony , author=. American Journal of Sociology , volume=. 1977 , publisher=

    work page 1977

  38. [38]

    Business Ethics Quarterly , volume=

    Where is the accountability in international accountability standards?: A decoupling perspective , author=. Business Ethics Quarterly , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    work page 2011

  39. [39]

    Strategic Management Journal , volume=

    Is regulatory adoption ceremonial? E vidence from lead director appointments , author=. Strategic Management Journal , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    work page 2018

  40. [40]

    Journal of Business Ethics , volume=

    Internalization of environmental practices and institutional complexity: can stakeholders pressures encourage greenwashing? , author=. Journal of Business Ethics , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    work page 2018

  41. [41]

    Technovation , volume=

    AI technology, AI narrative, and firm value , author=. Technovation , volume=. 2026 , publisher=

    work page 2026

  42. [42]

    Administrative Science Quarterly , volume=

    Effects of search timing on innovation: The value of not being in sync with rivals , author=. Administrative Science Quarterly , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

    work page 2008

  43. [43]

    Journal of Product Innovation Management , volume=

    Uses of agent-based modeling in innovation/new product development research , author=. Journal of Product Innovation Management , volume=. 2005 , publisher=

    work page 2005

  44. [44]

    Organization Science , volume=

    Examining configurations and firm performance in a suboptimal equifinality context , author=. Organization Science , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

    work page 2006

  45. [45]

    Strategic Management Journal , volume=

    Foreshadowing as impression management: Illuminating the path for security analysts , author=. Strategic Management Journal , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    work page 2017

  46. [46]

    Strategic Management Journal , volume=

    R&D, organization structure, and the development of corporate technological knowledge , author=. Strategic Management Journal , volume=. 2004 , publisher=

    work page 2004

  47. [47]

    Strategic Management Journal , volume=

    Organizational change and the dynamics of innovation: Formal R&D structure and intrafirm inventor networks , author=. Strategic Management Journal , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    work page 2020

  48. [48]

    AI & Society , volume=

    Minding the gap(s): public perceptions of AI and socio-technical imaginaries , author=. AI & Society , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    work page 2023

  49. [49]

    Critical Perspectives on Accounting , volume=

    Content marketing as a propaganda vehicle for a romantic-managerial conception of artificial intelligence , author=. Critical Perspectives on Accounting , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    work page 2025

  50. [50]

    European Journal of Risk Regulation , volume=

    Regulating uncertainty: Governing general-purpose ai models and systemic risk , author=. European Journal of Risk Regulation , volume=. 2026 , publisher=

    work page 2026

  51. [51]

    AI and Ethics , volume=

    Mapping global AI governance: a nascent regime in a fragmented landscape , author=. AI and Ethics , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    work page 2022

  52. [52]

    Research in International Business and Finance , volume=

    Greenwashing in environmental, social and governance disclosures , author=. Research in International Business and Finance , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    work page 2020

  53. [53]

    Journal of Accounting and Economics , volume=

    Limited attention, information disclosure, and financial reporting , author=. Journal of Accounting and Economics , volume=. 2003 , publisher=

    work page 2003

  54. [54]

    Journal of Economic Literature , volume=

    The economics of attention , author=. Journal of Economic Literature , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    work page 2025

  55. [55]

    Journal of Economic Literature , volume=

    Rational inattention: A review , author=. Journal of Economic Literature , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    work page 2023

  56. [56]

    Management Science , volume=

    Panic selling when disaster strikes: Evidence in the bond and stock markets , author=. Management Science , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    work page 2023

  57. [57]

    Public Administration Review , volume=

    Mass administrative reorganization, media attention, and the paradox of information , author=. Public Administration Review , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    work page 2015

  58. [58]

    International Review of Financial Analysis , volume=

    Informational role of rating revisions after reputational events and regulation reforms , author=. International Review of Financial Analysis , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    work page 2019

  59. [59]

    International Journal of Public Administration , volume=

    The dark sides of artificial intelligence: An integrated AI governance framework for public administration , author=. International Journal of Public Administration , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    work page 2020

  60. [60]

    International Review of Administrative Sciences , volume=

    Discursive framing and organizational venues: mechanisms of artificial intelligence policy adoption , author=. International Review of Administrative Sciences , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    work page 2023

  61. [61]

    Public Policy and Administration , volume=

    Data science, artificial intelligence and the third wave of digital era governance , author=. Public Policy and Administration , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    work page 2025

  62. [62]

    The American Economic Review , volume=

    Trade shocks and credit reallocation , author=. The American Economic Review , volume=. 2025 , doi=

    work page 2025

  63. [63]

    The American Economic Review , volume=

    Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information , author=. The American Economic Review , volume=. 1981 , publisher=

    work page 1981

  64. [64]

    Journal of Accounting and Economics , volume=

    Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature , author=. Journal of Accounting and Economics , volume=. 2001 , publisher=

    work page 2001

  65. [65]

    Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice , volume=

    The effect of virtuous and entrepreneurial orientations on microfinance lending and repayment: A signaling theory perspective , author=. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    work page 2015

  66. [66]

    Economic Inquiry , volume=

    R&D and credit rationing in SMEs , author=. Economic Inquiry , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    work page 2014

  67. [67]

    Management Science , volume=

    Debtor rights, credit supply, and innovation , author=. Management Science , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    work page 2017

  68. [68]

    Accounting Horizons , volume=

    Recent trends in audit report and earnings announcement lags , author=. Accounting Horizons , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    work page 2009

  69. [69]

    Economics of Innovation and New Technology , volume=

    Patents as quality signals? The implications for financing constraints on R&D , author=. Economics of Innovation and New Technology , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    work page 2016

  70. [70]

    International Journal of Communication , volume=

    Reading the 13th five-year plan: Reflections on China’s ICT policy , author=. International Journal of Communication , volume=. 2017 , doi=

    work page 2017

  71. [71]

    AI & Society , volume=

    The Chinese approach to artificial intelligence: an analysis of policy, ethics, and regulation , author=. AI & Society , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    work page 2021

  72. [72]

    Journal of Contemporary China , volume=

    Development of new generation of artificial intelligence in China: When Beijing’s global ambitions meet local realities , author=. Journal of Contemporary China , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    work page 2025

  73. [73]

    National Science Review , volume=

    Innovation and reform: China's 14th five-year plan unfolds , author=. National Science Review , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    work page 2021

  74. [74]

    Journal of Financial Economics , volume =

    Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure , author =. Journal of Financial Economics , volume =. 1976 , doi=

    work page 1976

  75. [75]

    Academy of Management Journal , volume=

    Guanxi: Connections as substitutes for formal institutional support , author=. Academy of Management Journal , volume=. 1996 , publisher=

    work page 1996

  76. [76]

    Strategic Management Journal , volume=

    Relational governance as an interorganizational strategy: An empirical test of the role of trust in economic exchange , author=. Strategic Management Journal , volume=. 1995 , publisher=

    work page 1995

  77. [77]

    The Accounting Review , volume=

    Accounting quality and debt contracting , author=. The Accounting Review , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

    work page 2008

  78. [78]

    The Review of Accounting Studies , volume=

    Bank asset transparency and credit supply , author=. The Review of Accounting Studies , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    work page 2019

  79. [79]

    American Sociological Review , volume=

    Embeddedness and contractual relationships in China's transitional economy , author=. American Sociological Review , volume=. 2003 , publisher=

    work page 2003

  80. [80]

    Emerging Markets Finance And Trade , volume=

    Government intervention and debt financing costs: Evidence from government-guided funds , author=. Emerging Markets Finance And Trade , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    work page 2022

Showing first 80 references.