pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.02362 · v3 · pith:DXUT3JSWnew · submitted 2025-11-04 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR

Data-driven Radiative Magnetohydrodynamics Simulations with the MURaM Code: Coronal Heating and Dynamics in an Emerging Active Region

Feng Chen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 01:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR
keywords solar active regionradiative magnetohydrodynamicsdata-driven simulationcoronal heatingEUV emissionMHD wavesemerging flux
0
0 comments X

The pith

Data-driven radiative MHD simulations of solar active region 11640 reproduce observed EUV features and show heating rate proportional to B squared.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates a hybrid modeling approach that uses observed magnetic field data to drive simulations of an emerging active region over four days. It combines idealized long-term magnetic evolution models with detailed radiative MHD calculations for shorter intervals. This produces synthetic EUV images that capture many features seen in real observations of the region. The simulation uncovers three-dimensional structures where the volumetric heating rate in bright coronal loops follows a B squared dependence. It also shows plasma velocities and waves that indicate dynamic behavior at various temperatures.

Core claim

By driving the radiative MHD model with time-dependent observational boundaries, the evolution of active region 11640 is followed, reproducing key EUV emission features. Coronal loops are seen connecting sunspots or extending to boundaries. The volumetric heating rate in bright coronal loops is proportional to the square of the magnetic field. Emission-measure-weighted velocities indicate vigorous dynamics and MHD waves across temperature ranges.

What carries the argument

Hybrid strategy coupling long-term zero-beta idealized magnetic field models with shorter-period radiative MHD simulations incorporating observed time-dependent boundaries.

Load-bearing premise

The hybrid coupling between long-term zero-beta idealized models and shorter-period radiative MHD runs introduces no significant artifacts and the observational magnetic field boundaries accurately represent the true photospheric evolution without unresolved small-scale flux.

What would settle it

Observation of significant discrepancies between the synthesized EUV images from the simulation and actual remote sensing data of active region 11640 would indicate that the model does not faithfully reproduce the coronal emission features.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.02362 by Feng Chen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The upper panels show the evolution of the observed radial magnetic field of AR11640. Only the central part of the padded array is displayed. The lower panels present the coronal magnetic field in the Bevo Ω0 run. The angle of view in each panel is set to reflect in the position of the active region on the solar disk at the observed time. The grayscale images show Bz at the bottom of the simulation domain.… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: A comparison of the observed and synthesized AIA 171 images of AR11640. The actual AIA 171 images captured at 2 h 0 m UT are displayed in the upper row on a logarithmic scale between 20 and 2000 DN/s/pixel. The synthesized 171 images from the radiative MHD models with Ω = 0 (see main text for details) are shown in the lower panels on a logarithmic scale between 10 and 1000 DN/s/pixel. The view angles of th… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: A comparison of synthesized EUV emission from run cases with different Ω parameter that adds additional twist in the magnetic field while keeping the vertical component unchanged (see main text for details). Each column presents the results from a certain Ω value. The upper two rows show AIA 171 images from models on Day 1 and Day 2, respectively. The third row displays AIA 131 images, which in this active… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Coronal density and temperature as a function of height. The results from 4 run cases, as indicated by the legend, are compared. The data are averaged over time for a period of more than 1 hour. The 3D cube is averaged in the horizontal dimensions, which provides the height profile shown here. The axis of height is displayed on a logarithmic scale, such that the lower atmosphere of a stronger stratificatio… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: A 3D rendering of the coronal density and temperatures in the Ω0 and Ω3 models on Day 2. The opaque features display the plasma density. Only the density values of the loops connecting the sunspots are illustrated, by forcing lower values in the coronal volume to be completely transparent. The density features are colored according to their temperature, as indicated by the color bar. The top and bottom row… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Synthesized AIA 171 images of the radiative MHD models (on Day 2) with standard and high resolutions. The left column shows the Ω0 and Ω3 models calculated with standard horizontal resolution, where the horizontal dimension is resolved by 512 grid points × 288 km grid spacing. The right column displays the models calculated with the same parameters but a high resolution mesh, where the horizontal dimension… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Line-of-sight velocities of the plasma in different temperature ranges. The mean velocity in the display wide temperature range is obtained by using the emission measure with an interval of log10 T = 0.1 as the weight for averaging and is equivalent to the Doppler velocity that would be measured from a spectral forming in the given temperature range. Positive values (shown in blue) correspond to upflows. T… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Time-distance diagram illustrating the propagating disturbances along the slit shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The mean coronal heating rates of the Ω3 models on Day 1 (left column) and Day 2 (right column). The top view presents an average along the z direction between the coronal base and the top of the domain. The side view presents an average of the y direction between y = 50 and 450. The points close to the y boundary are excluded to avoid the unrealistic magnetic separatrix due to the periodicity. ratrix buil… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The vertical energy fluxes that are defined by Equation (7) in the main text and depict the energy transport and dissipation through the vertical domain. In the left panel, the energy fluxes for resistive heating (Fres), Lorentz force work (Fwlr), thermal conduction (Fcond), optically thin radiative loss (Floss), and advection (Fadv), which includes enthalpy and kinetic energy fluxes are plotted, as indic… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Coronal density and temperature as a function of height. The results from the 5 models compared in the right panel of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present the application of the data-driven branch of the MURaM code, which follows the evolution of the active region 11640 over 4 days starting from 2012 December 30 at 12:00 UT and reproduces many key coronal extreme-ultraviolet (EUV) emission features seen in remote sensing observations. Radiative magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulations that account for sophisticated energy transport processes, such as those in the real corona, have been extended with the ability to use observations as time-dependent boundaries such that the models follow the evolution of actual active regions. This opens the possibility of a one-to-one model of a target region over an extensive time period. We use a hybrid strategy that combines fast-evolving idealized zero-$\beta$ models that capture the evolution of the large-scale active region magnetic field over a long time period and sophisticated radiative MHD models for a shorter time period of interest. The synthesized EUV images illustrate the formation of coronal loops that connect the two sunspots or fan out to the domain boundary. The model reveals in three-dimensional space fine structure in the coronal heating and plasma properties, which are usually concealed behind the EUV observables. The volumetric heating rate in bright coronal loops is proportional to $\mathbf{B}^{2}$. The emission-measure-weighted line-of-sight velocity, which represents the Doppler shift of a spectral line forming in a certain temperature range, reveals vigorous dynamics in plasma at different temperatures and ubiquitous MHD waves, as expected in the real solar corona.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript applies the data-driven branch of the MURaM code to simulate the evolution of active region 11640 over approximately 4 days starting 2012 December 30. It employs a hybrid strategy that evolves the large-scale magnetic field with idealized zero-β models for long timescales before switching to full radiative MHD for shorter periods of interest. The work claims to reproduce many key EUV emission features observed in remote-sensing data, reveals three-dimensional fine structure in coronal heating and plasma properties, reports that the volumetric heating rate in bright coronal loops scales proportionally to B², and identifies vigorous plasma dynamics and ubiquitous MHD waves via emission-measure-weighted line-of-sight velocities.

Significance. If the central results are robust, the paper makes a valuable contribution by demonstrating practical data-driven radiative MHD modeling of a real emerging active region over multi-day timescales. The hybrid approach enables efficient capture of long-term magnetic evolution while incorporating realistic energy transport, and the reported B² heating scaling together with the 3D diagnostics of loop fine structure and wave activity provide testable insights into coronal heating mechanisms that can be compared directly against observations.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and Methods] Abstract and Methods: The hybrid zero-β to radiative-MHD interface is load-bearing for the reported heating-B² relation, yet the manuscript provides no quantitative checks (e.g., continuity of magnetic topology, plasma β, or Poynting flux across the switch time) that would demonstrate the absence of transient artifacts capable of biasing subsequent ohmic or viscous dissipation inside the loops.
  2. [Results] Results: The claim that the volumetric heating rate in bright coronal loops is proportional to B² is presented without fitted slope, correlation coefficient, uncertainty estimates, or explicit description of how loop selection and post-processing thresholds influence the reported scaling; this absence weakens the ability to evaluate the robustness of the central observational-model comparison.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: Specify the exact duration and start time of the shorter radiative-MHD segment relative to the overall 4-day zero-β evolution to clarify the temporal coverage.
  2. [Figures] Figures: Include side-by-side quantitative comparisons (e.g., intensity histograms or loop-width statistics) between synthesized EUV images and the corresponding AIA observations of AR 11640 to strengthen the reproduction claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review. The comments identify areas where additional quantitative detail will strengthen the manuscript, and we will incorporate the requested validations and statistical information in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and Methods] Abstract and Methods: The hybrid zero-β to radiative-MHD interface is load-bearing for the reported heating-B² relation, yet the manuscript provides no quantitative checks (e.g., continuity of magnetic topology, plasma β, or Poynting flux across the switch time) that would demonstrate the absence of transient artifacts capable of biasing subsequent ohmic or viscous dissipation inside the loops.

    Authors: We agree that explicit checks at the hybrid interface would increase confidence in the robustness of the subsequent heating results. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection in the Methods that quantifies continuity of the magnetic topology, plasma β, and vertical Poynting flux immediately before and after the switch from the zero-β to the full radiative-MHD run. Time series and spatial maps will be included to show that any transients decay rapidly and do not systematically affect the ohmic or viscous dissipation inside the coronal loops. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] Results: The claim that the volumetric heating rate in bright coronal loops is proportional to B² is presented without fitted slope, correlation coefficient, uncertainty estimates, or explicit description of how loop selection and post-processing thresholds influence the reported scaling; this absence weakens the ability to evaluate the robustness of the central observational-model comparison.

    Authors: We accept that the current presentation of the B² scaling lacks the statistical detail needed for a rigorous assessment. In the revised Results section we will report the best-fit slope with uncertainties, the Pearson correlation coefficient, and the number of loops analyzed. We will also provide a clear description of the loop-selection algorithm, the emission-measure and temperature thresholds used to define “bright coronal loops,” and a short sensitivity test showing how the reported scaling changes when these thresholds are varied by ±20 %. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: heating-B² relation extracted from data-driven simulation output

full rationale

The paper drives MURaM simulations with external observational magnetic-field boundaries over 4 days for AR 11640, using a hybrid zero-β idealized model for long-term evolution followed by shorter radiative MHD segments. The central claim that volumetric heating rate in bright coronal loops is proportional to B² is presented as an output extracted from the model results in three-dimensional space, not imposed by construction, fitted to a subset of data, or justified via self-citation chains. No equations or ansatzes in the abstract reduce the reported proportionality to the inputs by definition, and the hybrid interface is described as a methodological choice without load-bearing uniqueness theorems from prior author work. The derivation remains self-contained against external observational benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper relies on the established MURaM code and standard MHD assumptions; no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the abstract description.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The MURaM radiative MHD code and its zero-β extension accurately capture the dominant energy transport and magnetic evolution in the solar corona when driven by observed boundaries.
    Invoked implicitly by the choice to use the code for the target region without additional validation steps described in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5807 in / 1340 out tokens · 32519 ms · 2026-05-18T01:41:16.282059+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    N., Fan, Y., Kazachenko, M

    Afanasyev, A. N., Fan, Y., Kazachenko, M. D., & Cheung, M. C. M. 2023, ApJ, 952, 136, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acd7e9

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acd7e9 2023

  2. [2]

    2014, Nature, 514, 465, doi: 10.1038/nature13815

    Amari, T., Canou, A., & Aly, J.-J. 2014, Nature, 514, 465, doi: 10.1038/nature13815

    work page doi:10.1038/nature13815 2014

  3. [3]

    F., Aly, J

    Amari, T., Luciani, J. F., Aly, J. J., Mikic, Z., & Linker, J. 2003a, ApJ, 585, 1073, doi: 10.1086/345501

    work page doi:10.1086/345501

  4. [4]

    F., Aly, J

    Amari, T., Luciani, J. F., Aly, J. J., Mikic, Z., & Linker, J. 2003b, ApJ, 595, 1231, doi: 10.1086/377444

    work page doi:10.1086/377444

  5. [5]

    2011, A&A, 530, A112, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201016019

    Bingert, S., & Peter, H. 2011, A&A, 530, A112, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201016019

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201016019 2011

  6. [6]

    A., Bingert, S., & Peter, H

    Bourdin, P. A., Bingert, S., & Peter, H. 2013, A&A, 555, A123, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321185

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321185 2013

  7. [7]

    2022, A&A, 658, A45, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141451

    Breu, C., Peter, H., Cameron, R., et al. 2022, A&A, 658, A45, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141451

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141451 2022

  8. [8]

    2024, MNRAS, 530, 2361, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae899

    Moortel, I. 2024, MNRAS, 530, 2361, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae899

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae899 2024

  9. [9]

    S., & Poland, A

    Chae, J., Yun, H. S., & Poland, A. I. 1998, ApJS, 114, 151, doi: 10.1086/313064

    work page doi:10.1086/313064 1998

  10. [10]

    Chen, F., Cheung, M. C. M., Rempel, M., & Chintzoglou, G. 2023a, ApJ, 949, 118, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acc8c5

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acc8c5

  11. [11]

    2015, A&A, 581, A137, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526237

    Chen, F., & Peter, H. 2015, A&A, 581, A137, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526237

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526237 2015

  12. [12]

    Chen, F., Peter, H., Bingert, S., & Cheung, M. C. M. 2015, Nature Physics, 11, 492, doi: 10.1038/nphys3315

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys3315 2015

  13. [13]

    2022, ApJ, 937, 91, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8f95

    Chen, F., Rempel, M., & Fan, Y. 2022, ApJ, 937, 91, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8f95

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8f95 2022

  14. [14]

    2023b, ApJL, 950, L3, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acda2e

    Chen, F., Rempel, M., & Fan, Y. 2023b, ApJL, 950, L3, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acda2e

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acda2e 2041

  15. [15]

    Chen, Y., Peter, H., Przybylski, D., Iijima, H., & Chitta, L. P. 2025, A&A, 702, L4, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202556696

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202556696 2025

  16. [16]

    2021, ApJ, 920, 116, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1792

    Chen, Y., Li, W., Tian, H., et al. 2021, ApJ, 920, 116, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1792

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac1792 2021

  17. [17]

    Cheung, M. C. M., & DeRosa, M. L. 2012, ApJ, 757, 147, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/757/2/147

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/757/2/147 2012

  18. [18]

    Cheung, M. C. M., De Pontieu, B., Tarbell, T. D., et al. 2015, ApJ, 801, 83, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/801/2/83

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/801/2/83 2015

  19. [19]

    Cheung, M. C. M., Rempel, M., Chintzoglou, G., et al. 2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 160, doi: 10.1038/s41550-018-0629-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-018-0629-3 2019

  20. [20]

    A., Caplan, R

    Downs, C., Linker, J. A., Caplan, R. M., et al. 2025, Science, 388, 1306, doi: 10.1126/science.adq0872

    work page doi:10.1126/science.adq0872 2025

  21. [21]

    D., Afanasyev, A

    Fan, Y., Kazachenko, M. D., Afanasyev, A. N., & Fisher, G. H. 2024, ApJ, 975, 206, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7f53

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad7f53 2024

  22. [22]

    H., Kazachenko, M

    Fisher, G. H., Kazachenko, M. D., Welsch, B. T., et al. 2020, ApJS, 248, 2, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab8303

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab8303 2020

  23. [23]

    Skirvin, S. J. 2023, ApJ, 955, 73, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acf454

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acf454 2023

  24. [24]

    V., & Nordlund, ˚A

    Gudiksen, B. V., & Nordlund, ˚A. 2005a, ApJ, 618, 1020, doi: 10.1086/426063

    work page doi:10.1086/426063

  25. [25]

    V., & Nordlund, ˚A

    Gudiksen, B. V., & Nordlund, ˚A. 2005b, ApJ, 618, 1031, doi: 10.1086/426064

    work page doi:10.1086/426064

  26. [26]

    H., Ni, Y

    Guo, J. H., Ni, Y. W., Zhong, Z., et al. 2023, ApJS, 266, 3, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/acc797

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/acc797 2023

  27. [27]

    H., Ni, Y

    Guo, J. H., Ni, Y. W., Guo, Y., et al. 2024, ApJ, 961, 140, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad088d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad088d 2024

  28. [28]

    2023, ApJL, 949, L1, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acd347

    Guo, M., Duckenfield, T., Van Doorsselaere, T., et al. 2023, ApJL, 949, L1, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acd347

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acd347 2023

  29. [29]

    2024, A&A, 687, A30, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449991

    Guo, M., Van Doorsselaere, T., Li, B., & Goossens, M. 2024, A&A, 687, A30, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449991

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449991 2024

  30. [30]

    D., & Chen, P

    Guo, Y., Xia, C., Keppens, R., Ding, M. D., & Chen, P. F. 2019, ApJL, 870, L21, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aafabf

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aafabf 2019

  31. [31]

    2015, ApJ, 811, 106, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/811/2/106

    Hansteen, V., Guerreiro, N., De Pontieu, B., & Carlsson, M. 2015, ApJ, 811, 106, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/811/2/106

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/811/2/106 2015

  32. [32]

    K., Sakao, T., Mandrini, C

    Harra, L. K., Sakao, T., Mandrini, C. H., et al. 2008, ApJL, 676, L147, doi: 10.1086/587485

    work page doi:10.1086/587485 2008

  33. [33]

    2018, ApJ, 855, 11, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaacd8

    Hayashi, K., Feng, X., Xiong, M., & Jiang, C. 2018, ApJ, 855, 11, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaacd8

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaacd8 2018

  34. [34]

    T., Liu, Y., Hayashi, K., et al

    Hoeksema, J. T., Liu, Y., Hayashi, K., et al. 2014, SoPh, 289, 3483, doi: 10.1007/s11207-014-0516-8

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-014-0516-8 2014

  35. [35]

    2023, ApJL, 951, L47, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acdde0

    Iijima, H., Matsumoto, T., Hotta, H., & Imada, S. 2023, ApJL, 951, L47, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acdde0

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acdde0 2023

  36. [36]

    2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2210.07492

    Inoue, S., Hayashi, K., & Miyoshi, T. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2210.07492. https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.07492

    work page arXiv 2022

  37. [37]

    2018, Nature Communications, 9, 174, doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02616-8

    Inoue, S., Kusano, K., B¨ uchner, J., & Sk´ ala, J. 2018, Nature Communications, 9, 174, doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02616-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-017-02616-8 2018

  38. [38]

    2024, Science China Earth Sciences, 67, 3765, doi: 10.1007/s11430-023-1402-3

    Jiang, C. 2024, Science China Earth Sciences, 67, 3765, doi: 10.1007/s11430-023-1402-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s11430-023-1402-3 2024

  39. [39]

    2022, The Innovation, 3, 100236, doi: 10.1016/j.xinn.2022.100236

    Jiang, C., Feng, X., Guo, Y., & Hu, Q. 2022, The Innovation, 3, 100236, doi: 10.1016/j.xinn.2022.100236

    work page doi:10.1016/j.xinn.2022.100236 2022

  40. [40]

    2018, ApJ, 867, 122, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aae1fd

    Jin, M., Petrosian, V., Liu, W., et al. 2018, ApJ, 867, 122, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aae1fd

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aae1fd 2018

  41. [41]

    2021, ApJ, 909, 155, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abe414

    Kaneko, T., Park, S.-H., & Kusano, K. 2021, ApJ, 909, 155, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abe414

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abe414 2021

  42. [42]

    D., Fisher, G

    Kazachenko, M. D., Fisher, G. H., & Welsch, B. T. 2014, ApJ, 795, 17, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/795/1/17

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/795/1/17 2014

  43. [43]

    Y., Duckenfield, T

    Kolotkov, D. Y., Duckenfield, T. J., & Nakariakov, V. M. 2020, A&A, 644, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039095

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039095 2020

  44. [44]

    2019, Atmosphere, 10, doi: 10.3390/atmos10090488

    Li, S., Jaroszynski, S., Pearse, S., Orf, L., & Clyne, J. 2019, Atmosphere, 10, doi: 10.3390/atmos10090488

    work page doi:10.3390/atmos10090488 2019

  45. [45]

    2023, MNRAS, 519, 5579, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad062 24F

    Lopin, I., & Nagorny, I. 2023, MNRAS, 519, 5579, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad062 24F. Chen

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad062 2023

  46. [46]

    D., et al

    Lu, Z., Chen, F., Ding, M. D., et al. 2024a, Nature Astronomy, 8, 706, doi: 10.1038/s41550-024-02244-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-024-02244-5

  47. [47]

    H., et al

    Lu, Z., Chen, F., Guo, J. H., et al. 2024b, ApJL, 973, L1, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad73d2

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad73d2 2041

  48. [48]

    J., et al

    Lumme, E., Pomoell, J., Price, D. J., et al. 2022, A&A, 658, A200, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038744

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038744 2022

  49. [49]

    A., & Rempel, M

    Klimchuk, J. A., & Rempel, M. 2022, ApJ, 927, 1, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac3df9

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac3df9 2022

  50. [50]

    P., Antolin, P., et al

    Mandal, S., Chitta, L. P., Antolin, P., et al. 2022, A&A, 666, L2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244403 Miki´ c, Z., Downs, C., Linker, J. A., et al. 2018, Nature Astronomy, 2, 913, doi: 10.1038/s41550-018-0562-5

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244403 2022

  51. [51]

    J., Gao, Y., Tajfirouze, E., et al

    Morton, R. J., Gao, Y., Tajfirouze, E., et al. 2025, Nature Astronomy, doi: 10.1038/s41550-025-02690-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-025-02690-9 2025

  52. [52]

    M., Pilipenko, V., Heilig, B., et al

    Nakariakov, V. M., Pilipenko, V., Heilig, B., et al. 2016, SSRv, 200, 75, doi: 10.1007/s11214-015-0233-0

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-015-0233-0 2016

  53. [53]

    2022, ApJ, 926, 64, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4090

    Ofman, L., & Wang, T. 2022, ApJ, 926, 64, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4090

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac4090 2022

  54. [54]

    Peter, H., & Judge, P. G. 1999, ApJ, 522, 1148

    work page 1999

  55. [55]

    2019, SoPh, 294, 41, doi: 10.1007/s11207-019-1430-x

    Pomoell, J., Lumme, E., & Kilpua, E. 2019, SoPh, 294, 41, doi: 10.1007/s11207-019-1430-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-019-1430-x 2019

  56. [56]

    2014, ApJ, 789, 132, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/789/2/132 20Sowmya et al

    Rempel, M. 2014, ApJ, 789, 132, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/789/2/132

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/789/2/132 2014

  57. [57]

    R., Warner, M., Keil, S

    Rempel, M. 2017, ApJ, 834, 10, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/10

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/10 2017

  58. [58]

    Rempel, M., Chintzoglou, G., Cheung, M. C. M., Fan, Y., & Kleint, L. 2023, ApJ, 955, 105, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aced4d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aced4d 2023

  59. [59]

    H., & Vaiana, G

    Rosner, R., Tucker, W. H., & Vaiana, G. S. 1978, ApJ, 220, 643, doi: 10.1086/155949

    work page doi:10.1086/155949 1978

  60. [60]

    2007, Science, 318, 1585, doi: 10.1126/science.1147292

    Sakao, T., Kano, R., Narukage, N., et al. 2007, Science, 318, 1585, doi: 10.1126/science.1147292

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1147292 2007

  61. [61]

    , keywords =

    Scherrer, P. H., Schou, J., Bush, R. I., et al. 2012, SoPh, 275, 207, doi: 10.1007/s11207-011-9834-2

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-011-9834-2 2012

  62. [62]

    2024, Reviews of Modern Plasma Physics, 8, 27, doi: 10.1007/s41614-024-00166-3

    Schmieder, B., Guo, J., & Poedts, S. 2024, Reviews of Modern Plasma Physics, 8, 27, doi: 10.1007/s41614-024-00166-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s41614-024-00166-3 2024

  63. [63]

    M., Li, B., & Guo, M

    Shi, M., Nakariakov, V. M., Li, B., & Guo, M. 2025, ApJ, 990, 1, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adf647

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adf647 2025

  64. [64]

    2021, ApJ, 908, 233, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abda54

    Shi, M., Van Doorsselaere, T., Guo, M., et al. 2021, ApJ, 908, 233, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abda54

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abda54 2021

  65. [65]

    2022, ApJ, 928, 34, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac52ab

    Shi, T., Manchester, IV, W., Landi, E., et al. 2022, ApJ, 928, 34, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac52ab

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac52ab 2022

  66. [66]

    2024, ApJ, 961, 60, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0df2

    Shi, T., Manchester, W., Landi, E., et al. 2024, ApJ, 961, 60, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0df2

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad0df2 2024

  67. [67]

    2018, ApJ, 854, 174, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaaae6

    Tian, H., Zhu, X., Peter, H., et al. 2018, ApJ, 854, 174, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaaae6

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaaae6 2018

  68. [68]

    Toriumi, S., Katsukawa, Y., & Cheung, M. C. M. 2017, ApJ, 836, 63, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/63 Van Damme, H. J., De Moortel, I., Pagano, P., & Johnston, C. D. 2020, A&A, 635, A174, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201937266 Van Doorsselaere, T., Srivastava, A. K., Antolin, P., et al. 2020, SSRv, 216, 140, doi: 10.1007/s11214-020-00770-y

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/63 2017

  69. [69]

    2019, A&A, 624, L12, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935385

    Warnecke, J., & Peter, H. 2019, A&A, 624, L12, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935385

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935385 2019

  70. [70]

    P., Ugarte-Urra, I., Young, P

    Warren, H. P., Ugarte-Urra, I., Young, P. R., & Stenborg, G. 2011, ApJ, 727, 58, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/727/1/58

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/727/1/58 2011

  71. [71]

    E., & Del Zanna, G

    Winebarger, A., Tripathi, D., Mason, H. E., & Del Zanna, G. 2013, ApJ, 767, 107, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/767/2/107

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/767/2/107 2013

  72. [72]

    2024, Science, 386, 76, doi: 10.1126/science.ado2993

    Yang, Z., Tian, H., Tomczyk, S., et al. 2024, Science, 386, 76, doi: 10.1126/science.ado2993

    work page doi:10.1126/science.ado2993 2024

  73. [73]

    2020, Science, 369, 694, doi: 10.1126/science.abb4462

    Yang, Z., Bethge, C., Tian, H., et al. 2020, Science, 369, 694, doi: 10.1126/science.abb4462

    work page doi:10.1126/science.abb4462 2020

  74. [74]

    Zhong, Z., Guo, Y., & Ding, M. D. 2021, Nature Communications, 12, 2734, doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23037-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23037-8 2021

  75. [75]

    2025, A&A, 701, A205, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202555618

    Zhu, Y., Harra, L., Barczynski, K., et al. 2025, A&A, 701, A205, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202555618

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555618 2025