REVIEW 1 cited by
Classical Notions and Problems in Thurston Geometries
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Of the Thurston geometries, those with constant curvature geometries (Euclidean $\EUC$, hyperbolic $\HYP$, spherical $\SPH$) have been extensively studied, but the other five geometries, $\HXR$, $\SXR$, $\NIL$, $\SLR$, $\SOL$ have been thoroughly studied only from a differential geometry and topological point of view. However, classical concepts highlighting the beauty and underlying structure of these -- such as geodesic curves and spheres, the lattices, the geodesic triangles and their surfaces, their interior sum of angles and similar statements to those known in constant curvature geometries can be formulated. These have not been the focus of attention. In this survey, we summarize our results on this topic and pose additional open questions.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Menelaus' and Ceva's theorems for translation triangles in Thurston geometries
Menelaus' and Ceva's theorems are formulated and proved for translation triangles in Nil, Sol, and ~SL2R spaces using geometry-specific simple ratios.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.