Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 218 references

Stellar Ancestry Unlocked: Chemical and Orbital Clues Link Metal Poor Stars to Globular Clusters and the Galaxy's Thick Disk

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Three metal-poor stars in the solar neighborhood are chemically and dynamically linked to specific globular clusters, while two more belong to the Galaxy's thick disk.

desk verdict Solid abundance work carrying an unsound cluster-origin headline: the encounter probabilities in Eqs. (4)-(5) do not normalize as probabilities, so the GC links need a major fix or removal. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.10400 v1 pith:E2ECBRB7 submitted 2025-06-12 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.SR

Gizay Yolalan , Timur Şahin , Selçuk Bilir , Olcay Plevne This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.SR
keywords metal-poorstarsglobularclusterschemicaltaggingGalacticthickdiskorbitaldynamicsstellarabundancessolarneighborhoodhighpropermotion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that three of five metal-poor, high-proper-motion G-type stars near the Sun are chemically tagged remnants of specific globular clusters: HD 2665 of NGC 5139 (omega Centauri), HD 218857 of NGC 5634, and HD 122956 of NGC 6864 (M75), while HD 5916 and HD 189349 belong to the Galaxy's thick disk. The claim rests on new 29-species abundance measurements from ELODIE and ESPaDOnS spectra combined with 13 Gyr orbital integrations and a probabilistic encounter score between each star and 170 globular clusters. If correct, the paper shows that individual field stars can retain a memory of their birth cluster in both orbit and chemistry, opening a way to map dissolved clusters through the solar neighborhood.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a joint chemokinematic assignment test. Orbits of the five stars and 170 globular clusters are integrated backward for 13 Gyr in the MilkyWayPotential2014; at every step the separation between star and cluster center is compared in position and velocity. Encounter probabilities are computed as Gaussian functions of the three-dimensional separation (scaled by five tidal radii) and of the relative velocity (scaled by the cluster escape speed), and the product P(origin|θ,ν) = P(θ)×P(ν) ranks the candidate clusters. On the chemical side, the paper compares observed [X/Fe] ratios for up to 25 elements against published abundances of the top-ranked clusters, using agreement in Mg, Ca, Ti, and odd-Z iron-peak elements plus age and metallicity to accept or reject a cluster origin.

What would settle it

Run the same encounter-probability calculation on a control sample of, say, 1,000 randomly chosen metal-poor field stars with comparable astrometric precision; if any one of the 170 clusters scores above 60 percent for a large fraction of control stars, the reported cluster assignments are not statistically meaningful.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that chemodynamic tagging can assign individual metal-poor field stars to globular cluster progenitors. HD 2665 shows an 81% encounter probability with NGC 5139 and abundance agreement within about 0.1 dex for Ca, Sc, Ti, and Ni, which the authors read as evidence it was ejected from omega Centauri. HD 218857's orbit and abundance pattern are consistent with NGC 5634, with NGC 5139 remaining a dynamically ranked alternative, and HD 122956 aligns with NGC 6864 (M75), although its age, [Fe/H], and [Mg/Fe] also resemble the poorly sampled cluster NGC 6517. By contrast, the two more metal-rich program stars, HD 5916 and HD 189349, have high encounter scores with clusters such as NGC 6441 and NGC 5927 but fail age and chemical consistency tests, so the paper classifies them as thick-disk field stars. The paper also reports first detections of several elements in these stars, including Ce and Nd in HD 2665.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the Gaussian encounter-probability formula, which multiplies a spatial-match probability by a velocity-match probability, gives a meaningful statistical measure of whether a star came from a particular globular cluster rather than merely a ranking of close orbital coincidences.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • HD 2665, with an 81% encounter probability and sub-0.1 dex agreement in Ca, Sc, Ti, and Ni, would be the first solar-neighborhood field star convincingly tagged to omega Centauri, implying that the most massive Galactic globular cluster has shed stars into the local volume.
  • HD 218857's chemodynamic consistency with NGC 5634 implies that metal-poor halo stars can preserve cluster-specific abundance patterns even after long dynamical evolution.
  • HD 122956's alignment with NGC 6864 (M75) connects a local metal-poor star to a distant outer-halo cluster, supporting the idea that globular clusters dissolve and populate the stellar halo with chemically recognizable debris.
  • Classifying HD 5916 and HD 189349 as thick-disk field stars adds two metal-poor, alpha-enhanced members to that population and shows that a high encounter score alone is insufficient to claim cluster origin.
  • The new first-time abundance detections (Ce, Nd in HD 2665; Al, V, Sm, Mn in HD 5916; Al in HD 122956; and 12 species in HD 189349) enlarge the chemical baseline available for future tagging and nucleosynthesis studies.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Applied to all bright metal-poor stars with precise astrometry, the same five-tidal-radius encounter scoring plus [X/Fe] matching could reveal dozens of additional stripped globular-cluster stars, including debris from clusters whose internal abundances are still poorly known.
  • The heavy reliance on a single APOGEE H-band star for NGC 6517 means the apparent HD 122956-NGC 6517 age/metallicity/Mg match is fragile; optical spectroscopy of a handful of NGC 6517 members would either confirm or remove that alternative.
  • The encounter-probability metric would be strengthened by a Monte Carlo null test: if random halo stars produce similar top-five scores against the same 170 clusters, the 50-80% values are better interpreted as selection effects than as physical associations.
  • The paper's age criterion, which rejects NGC 6441 for HD 5916 because the cluster is far older, suggests that age could be used as a general prior in future chemical-tagging searches rather than only for these five stars.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents a detailed spectroscopic, kinematic, and orbital analysis of five metal-poor, high-proper-motion G-type stars (HD 2665, HD 5916, HD 122956, HD 189349, HD 218857) using ELODIE and ESPaDOnS spectra, ATLAS9/LTE modeling with non-LTE corrections, MCMC isochrone ages, and galpy orbit integrations. The central scientific claims are that HD 2665, HD 218857, and HD 122956 are chemically and dynamically linked to the globular clusters NGC 5139, NGC 5634, and NGC 6864/M75, respectively, while HD 5916 and HD 189349 are thick-disk field stars. The quantitative support for the GC links rests on encounter probabilities computed in Section 4.3 (Eqs. 4-6, Table 8) combined with chemical abundance comparisons.

Significance. If the quantitative framework were valid, the paper would provide a useful demonstration of how joint chemical and dynamical information can tag nearby metal-poor stars to specific globular clusters. The abundance analysis itself is a genuine strength: the authors derive abundances for many species, cross-check gf-values against the Gaia-ESO line list, apply non-LTE corrections, and compare extensively with published parameters and abundances for each star. First-time detections of several elements in these stars are clearly documented. However, the headline cluster-origin claims rest on encounter probabilities that are not correctly defined as written, and the paper's own reported encounter statistics imply a large chance-coincidence background. The thick-disk classification of HD 5916 and HD 189349 is more robust because it is supported by kinematics, chemistry, and age, but the GC-link claims for the other three stars are not quantitatively supported until the probability analysis is repaired and renormalized.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 4.3, Eqs. (4)-(6)] Equations (4) and (5) do not define probability densities over encounter parameters. In Eq. (2), Δθ is a three-dimensional Cartesian distance in kpc, and in Eq. (3), Δν is a relative speed in km/s, but the Gaussian exponents use R_tidal and V_escape in the denominators, giving exponents with dimensions of kpc and km/s rather than dimensionless quantities. The prefactors also carry dimensionful units, so P(θ) and P(ν) cannot be multiplied in Eq. (6) to produce a probability. Consequently, the values in Table 8 (e.g., 96% × 84% = 81% for HD 2665 and NGC 5139) are not reproducible from the stated equations. A correct Gaussian encounter probability would require a scale parameter with the same units as the observable (e.g., exp[-(Δθ)^2/(2σ_θ^2)] with σ_θ in kpc), an explicit normalization over the 170-cluster catalog, and a treatment of the 50,000-60,000 encounters reported over 13 Gyr as a false-positive baseline. Until this is done, the Table 8 percentages are not a valid basis for the cluster-origin claims in the abstract.
  2. [Table 8 and Section 4.3, interpretation] The interpretation of the probabilities is inconsistent across the five stars. HD 5916 is assigned a 79% combined probability with NGC 6441 and HD 189349 a 63% probability with NGC 5927, yet both are classified as field stars because of age and metallicity mismatches. By the same logic, the 81% match for HD 2665 and the 66% match for HD 218857 should be subjected to the same chemical and age criteria before being accepted as cluster origins. The text in Section 4.1.1 describes 'exceptional agreement (<0.1 dex)' with NGC 5139 for HD 2665, but Table 9 lists [Mg/Fe] = 0.43 for NGC 5139 versus 0.23 for HD 2665 and [Y/Fe] = 0.25 for the cluster versus -0.47 for the star, differences of 0.2-0.7 dex. For HD 218857 versus NGC 5139, the text claims Mg agrees within <0.1 dex, but Table 9 gives 0.43 vs 0.16, a 0.27 dex difference. The chemical similarity argument is applied selectively, and no quantitative chemical-matching statistic with propagated uncertainties is provided.
  3. [Section 4.3, static potential and time baseline] The encounter probabilities are derived from 13 Gyr backward integrations in a static MilkyWayPotential2014, as the authors acknowledge. Under a static potential, cluster orbits ignore dynamical friction, cluster dissolution, and the time evolution of the Galactic potential. The text cautions that the proximity estimates should be interpreted 'within a probabilistic and statistical framework,' yet Table 8 quotes probabilities to two significant figures and the abstract converts them into definitive origin statements. The analysis needs an explicit null model: with 170 clusters and 50,000-60,000 recorded encounters, the probability that a star has at least one close encounter by chance is very high, and the reported top-ranked percentages must be corrected for this selection effect before they can support the claimed identifications.
  4. [Section 4.2, HD 5916 description] The text states that HD 5916 is 'positioned near Lz ≈ 0' in the Lindblad diagram, but Table 7 lists Lz = 1057.64 ± 1.75 kpc km/s for this star, which is far from zero and places it in the high-angular-momentum disk regime. This internal inconsistency appears in a section used to support the field-star classification, and while the thick-disk conclusion may still be correct, the description should be corrected or the discrepancy explained.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Table 8 references] The last table reference, 'Holtzman et al. (2025, in preparation)' for APOGEE DR17 data, is not a proper citable reference; the authors should cite the actual DR17 release paper or the relevant catalog instead.
  2. [Figure 8 caption] The caption lists the labeled stars as 'HD 122956, HD 189349, HD 005916, HD 122956, and HD 218857,' duplicating HD 122956 and omitting HD 2665; the list should be corrected.
  3. [Section 4.1.2] The paragraph discussing HD 189349 refers to 'Liu et al. (2019)' and then several times to 'Li et al. (2019)' within the same discussion; the intended reference is presumably Liu et al. (2019), and the citation should be made consistent.
  4. [Figure 6 caption] The caption says 'HD 2665, HD 5916, and HD 189349 thin disks, and HD 122956 and HD 218857 halo populations were also seen as members,' which is inconsistent with the rest of the paper's classification of HD 2665 as a halo star; the wording should be clarified.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central inference rests on external abundance comparisons, while the fragile encounter-probability metric is a statistical-validity concern rather than a derivation loop.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. Stellar parameters, abundances, Gaia astrometry, and orbit integrations are measured or computed from external data; GC positions, velocities, metallicities, ages, and abundances come from literature catalogs (Baumgardt et al. 2019; Vasiliev & Baumgardt 2021, and the references in Tables 8-9). The cluster-origin associations are selected by ranking P(origin|theta,nu) as defined in Eqs. (4)-(6) and then tested against literature cluster abundances in Figures 14-15 and Table 9. That external chemical comparison is independent of the orbital-similarity metric, so the central claim is not a restatement of its inputs. The paper itself flags the main limitations, noting that the static-potential proximity estimates 'should be interpreted within a probabilistic and statistical framework rather than as definitive timing determinations' and that 'there is no certain way to identify stars of accreted origin' (Section 3.3). These passages concern statistical validity and model risk, not circularity. The self-citations (Marismak et al. 2024; Cinar et al. 2025) introduce the Gaussian encounter-probability idea and the ~50,000-60,000 encounter count, but the governing equations and encounter count are restated in this paper, so those citations are not load-bearing. The dimensional and normalization problems in Eqs. (4)-(5) are a correctness risk in the probability model, not a circular derivation; if that model is invalid, the dynamical evidence weakens, but the chemical comparisons remain independent external evidence. Overall circularity is therefore low.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities such as particles or forces. The central claims rest instead on modeling choices: the encounter-radius threshold, the velocity smoothing scale, the static Galactic potential, the isochrone-based ages, and the normalization of the encounter probabilities. The first two are hand-chosen, the next two are standard but strong domain assumptions, and the last is ad hoc to this paper and mathematically problematic.

free parameters (2)
  • Encounter radius threshold = 5 x tidal radius
    Hand-chosen boundary for a close encounter in Eq. (4). The reported probabilities depend on this scale and no sensitivity analysis is provided.
  • Velocity dispersion scale = V_escape from MW GC Database
    Used as the width of the Gaussian in Eq. (5). It is a hand-chosen smoothing scale for velocity matches, not fitted to data but also not justified as a probability width.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption 1D LTE model atmospheres (ATLAS9 with ODFNEW) and MOOG line formation adequately represent the stellar photospheres; non-LTE corrections from published grids close the remaining gap.
    Invoked throughout Section 3.1. If 3D or non-LTE effects vary strongly by line, as the large Ti i corrections of +0.50 dex suggest, the reported [X/Fe] values and the GC chemical matches could shift.
  • domain assumption The static MilkyWayPotential2014 describes the Milky Way over the full 13 Gyr backward integration.
    Used in Sections 3.3 and 4.3 for all stellar and cluster orbits. The paper itself acknowledges the potential is static and does not evolve, which is a strong assumption for ancient, eccentric orbits.
  • domain assumption The PARSEC isochrone grid and the MCMC maximum-likelihood function in Eq. (1) correctly map Teff, log g, and [Fe/H] to stellar age.
    Used in Section 3.2. Ages derived this way are compared with cluster ages to reject or support cluster membership, so isochrone systematics propagate into the origin arguments.
  • ad hoc to paper The Gaussian encounter probabilities in Eqs. (4)-(5) are valid probability densities and can be multiplied to give an origin probability.
    Introduced solely for this analysis. The exponents have inconsistent dimensions and the distributions are not normalized over the encounter search or over the 170 clusters, so this axiom is not justified by the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Stellar Ancestry Unlocked: Chemical and Orbital Clues Link Metal Poor Stars to Globular Clusters and the Galaxy's Thick Disk." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/E2ECBRB7

@misc{pith2026250610400,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Stellar Ancestry Unlocked: Chemical and Orbital Clues Link Metal Poor Stars to Globular Clusters and the Galaxy's Thick Disk},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/E2ECBRB7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.10400}
}
abstract

This study presents a detailed chemical, kinematic, and orbital dynamic analysis of five metal poor stars in the solar neighborhood: HD 2665, HD 5916, HD 122956, HD 189349, and HD 218857. Using high-resolution spectroscopic data from the ELODIE and ESPaDOnS instruments, we derived elemental abundances for 29 species (25 elements: C, O, Na, Mg, Al, Si, S, Ca, Sc, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Sr, Y, Zr, Ba, Ce, Nd, and Sm) via LTE based analysis with ATLAS9 model atmospheres. Notably, we report first time detections of Ce and Nd in HD2665; Al, V, Sm, and Mn in HD5916; Al in HD 122956; and C, O, S, Sc, Mn, Co, Cu, Zn, Sr, Zr, Nd, and Sm in HD 189349. Dynamical and chemical diagnostics reveal distinct origins: HD 2665 shows strong orbital and chemical similarity to GC NGC 5139 ($\omega$ Cen), while HD 218857 exhibits chemodynamic signatures consistent with NGC 5634. HD 122956 aligns with NGC 6864 (M75), though intriguingly shares age, metallicity ([Fe/H]), and [Mg/Fe] ratios with NGC 6517, a cluster whose reported abundances are derived solely from one star with APOGEE $H$-band spectroscopic measurements, as no optical spectroscopic data exist for its members. In contrast, HD 5916 and HD 189349 exhibit kinematic and chemical properties consistent with the field-star population and are classified as thick disk members.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.10400 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A small region of the spectrum for five HPM sample stars. Identified lines are also indicated. 3. RESULTS 3.1. Spectroscopic Analysis For the abundance analysis of the five selected G￾type stars in this study—hereafter referred to as the program stars— we used the ATLAS9 model atmo￾spheres (Castelli & Kurucz 2004) assuming LTE with ODFNEW opacity distributions. The LTE line analysis code MOOG (Sneden 1973) 5 was use… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. An example for the determination of atmospheric parameters Teff and ξ using abundance (log ϵ) as a function of both LEP (panels a and b) and reduced EW (REW; log (EW/λ), panels c) for HD 189349 and HD 122956. The solid line in all panels is the least-squares fit to the data [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Non-LTE abundance corrections (in dex) for vari￾ous atomic species in the five program stars. The vertical axis lists the elements and their ionization states, and the hori￾zontal axis shows the stellar identifiers. The color indicates the magnitude of the non-LTE correction, which is defined as the abundance difference between the non-LTE and LTE calculations for each element. Corrections were computed using the av… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (12 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Corner plot displaying the posterior probability distributions for HD 122956 and HD 189349, with confidence levels marked at 68%, 90%, and 95%. The one-dimensional marginal distributions indicate the median values, along with the 16th and 84th percentiles. The right si…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Toomre diagram for five HPM stars. The solid red iso-velocity curves represent constant total space velocities from 50 to 500 steps of 50 km s−1 . The vertical grey band corresponds to a velocity of SLSR = -230±10 km s−1 (Necib & Lin 2022). Stars are classified as retr…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Zmax × ep diagram for five stars. The stars are color-coded according to their metallicities. Background blue points represent APOGEE DR17 stars selected using quality cuts as described in the text. matic criteria indicate that HD 5916 and HD 189349 are members of the …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Abundance ratios of α-elements ([Mg/Fe], [Si/Fe], [Ca/Fe], and [Ti i/Fe]) as a function of metallicity ([Fe/H]) for stars analyzed in this study (green diamonds with error bars and numbered from 1 to 5, in order of increasing metallicity: HD 2665 (1), HD 218857 (2), HD…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Orbital properties of five stars in the Lindblad diagram. Color-coded distribution of stellar angular momentum (Ltot) over the Milky Way stellar density map, with colored circles marking GC positions in the Galaxy (left panel). The same diagram is color-coded according…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Comparison of elemental abundance ratios [X/Fe] for the five program stars analyzed in this study (purple stars with error bars) against values compiled from the literature (cyan circles). Each panel corresponds to a different star, with the vertical axis listing the …
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Comparison of observed (black dotted) and synthetic (blue) spectra for Mg i and Mn i lines in the program stars HD 189349, HD 2665, HD 122956, HD 5916, and HD 218857. The spectral regions shown include the Mg i and Mn i lines. Derived logarithmic abundances (log ϵ) fo…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: shows the distribution of program stars in the [Mg/Mn]–[Al/Fe] abundance plane, which is a diag￾ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Likelihood of stars encountering various GCs, based on spatial and velocity parameters. The matrix displays three key probability values: spatial probability (P(θ)), velocity probability (P(ν)), and combined probability (P(origin|θ, ν)) for each cluster. Colors in the…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Elemental abundance ratios [X/Fe] as a function of atomic number for stars in the GCs NGC 5139 (top-left), NGC 6441 (bottom-left, Roediger et al. 2013; Gratton et al. 2006), NGC 5927 (top-right, Mura-Guzm´an et al. 2017) and NGC 5634 (bottom-right, Carretta et al. 201…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Comparative chemical abundance patterns of el￾ements (Mg to Y) relative to Fe in the stars of GCs NGC 6517 (orange dashed line) and NGC 6864 (blue dashed line) versus field star HD 122956. The upper panels show individ￾ual abundance ratios [X/Fe] with associated uncer…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

218 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.co...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" "doi:" doi * if FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix ":" * if eprint field.or.null * if FUNCTION format.pid eprint empty format.doi format.eprint if FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t...

  3. [3]

    #Fxټk 2VZp8e ̙3 TO袋hٲ 7g Ϟ=ʞֿ JUPP?O> h֬ \ |U>/B TSN9 7oNϞ=<y2 x<L63<(ڵ+ 'N ''6k֬G sΡM6 _g VlC 0*e|B `5K.eܸqtԉ0

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt \@twocolumntrue 12pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key o...

    2017

  4. [4]

    2022, , 259, 35

    Abdurro'uf , Accetta , K., Aerts , C., et al. 2022, , 259, 35

    2022

  5. [5]

    2018, , 613, A47

    Adam \'o w , M., Niedzielski , A., Kowalik , K., et al. 2018, , 613, A47

    2018

  6. [6]

    Z., Santos , N

    Adibekyan , V. Z., Santos , N. C., Sousa , S. G., & Israelian , G. 2011, , 535, L11

    2011

  7. [7]

    Z., Sousa , S

    Adibekyan , V. Z., Sousa , S. G., Santos , N. C., et al. 2012, , 545, A32

    2012

  8. [8]

    Z., Figueira , P., Santos , N

    Adibekyan , V. Z., Figueira , P., Santos , N. C., et al. 2013, , 554, A44

    2013

Show all 218 references
  1. [9]

    2018, , 155, 240

    Af s ar , M., Bozkurt , Z., B \"o cek Topcu , G., et al. 2018, , 155, 240

    2018

  2. [10]

    2024, Astronomische Nachrichten, 345, e20240052

    Akbaba , F., Ak , T., Bilir , S., et al. 2024, Astronomische Nachrichten, 345, e20240052

    2024

  3. [11]

    C., Wilhelm, R., et al

    Allende Prieto, C., Beers, T. C., Wilhelm, R., et al. 2006, The Astrophysical Journal, 636, 804. https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/498131

    2006 doi

  4. [12]

    1999, , 139, 335

    Alonso , A., Arribas , S., & Mart \' nez-Roger , C. 1999, , 139, 335

    1999

  5. [13]

    2019, , 627, A138

    Arentsen , A., Prugniel , P., Gonneau , A., et al. 2019, , 627, A138

    2019

  6. [14]

    J., & Scott , P

    Asplund , M., Grevesse , N., Sauval , A. J., & Scott , P. 2009, , 47, 481

    2009

  7. [15]

    1994, , 291, 895

    Axer , M., Fuhrmann , K., & Gehren , T. 1994, , 291, 895

    1994

  8. [16]

    2019, , 482, 5138

    Baumgardt , H., Hilker , M., Sollima , A., & Bellini , A. 2019, , 482, 5138

    2019

  9. [17]

    C., Norris , J

    Beers , T. C., Norris , J. E., Placco , V. M., et al. 2014, , 794, 58

    2014

  10. [18]

    R., & Ibata , R

    Bellazzini , M., Ferraro , F. R., & Ibata , R. 2002, , 124, 915

    2002

  11. [19]

    S., Yong , D., & Mel \'e ndez , J

    Bensby , T., Alves-Brito , A., Oey , M. S., Yong , D., & Mel \'e ndez , J. 2011, , 735, L46

    2011

  12. [20]

    2003, , 410, 527

    Bensby , T., Feltzing , S., & Lundstr \"o m , I. 2003, , 410, 527

    2003

  13. [21]

    2004, , 415, 155

    ---. 2004, , 415, 155

    2004

  14. [22]

    2005, , 433, 185

    Bensby , T., Feltzing , S., Lundstr \"o m , I., & Ilyin , I. 2005, , 433, 185

    2005

  15. [23]

    Bensby , T., Feltzing , S., & Oey , M. S. 2014, , 562, A71

    2014

  16. [24]

    R., Oey , M

    Bensby , T., Zenn , A. R., Oey , M. S., & Feltzing , S. 2007, , 663, L13

    2007

  17. [25]

    2012, , 427, 27

    Bergemann , M., Lind , K., Collet , R., Magic , Z., & Asplund , M. 2012, , 427, 27

    2012

  18. [26]

    J., Eitner , P., et al

    Bergemann , M., Gallagher , A. J., Eitner , P., et al. 2019, , 631, A80

    2019

  19. [27]

    2008, , 25, 69

    Bilir , S., Cabrera-Lavers , A., Karaali , S., et al. 2008, , 25, 69

    2008

  20. [28]

    2012, , 421, 3362

    Bilir , S., Karaali , S., Ak , S., et al. 2012, , 421, 3362

    2012

  21. [29]

    2006, , 366, 1295

    Bilir , S., Karaali , S., & Gilmore , G. 2006, , 366, 1295

    2006

  22. [30]

    2016, , 54, 529

    Bland-Hawthorn , J., & Gerhard , O. 2016, , 54, 529

    2016

  23. [31]

    Boeche , C., & Grebel , E. K. 2016, , 587, A2

    2016

  24. [32]

    Bond , H. E. 1970, , 22, 117

    1970

  25. [33]

    2015, , 216, 29

    Bovy , J. 2015, , 216, 29

    2015

  26. [34]

    2013, , 779, 115

    Bovy , J., & Rix , H.-W. 2013, , 779, 115

    2013

  27. [35]

    2012, , 427, 127

    Bressan , A., Marigo , P., Girardi , L., et al. 2012, , 427, 127

    2012

  28. [36]

    L., Pilachowski , C

    Burris , D. L., Pilachowski , C. A., Armandroff , T. E., et al. 2000, , 544, 302

    2000

  29. [37]

    W., Latham , D

    Carney , B. W., Latham , D. W., Laird , J. B., & Aguilar , L. A. 1994, , 107, 2240

    1994

  30. [38]

    W., Latham , D

    Carney , B. W., Latham , D. W., Stefanik , R. P., & Laird , J. B. 2008, , 135, 196

    2008

  31. [39]

    2009, , 508, 695

    Carretta , E., Bragaglia , A., Gratton , R., D'Orazi , V., & Lucatello , S. 2009, , 508, 695

    2009

  32. [40]

    2017, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 600, A118

    Carretta, E., Bragaglia, A., Lucatello, S., et al. 2017, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 600, A118

    2017

  33. [41]

    G., et al

    Carretta , E., Bragaglia , A., Gratton , R. G., et al. 2015, , 578, A116

    2015

  34. [42]

    Castelli , F., & Kurucz , R. L. 2004, , 419, 725

    2004

  35. [43]

    C., Bilir , S., S ahin , T., & Plevne , O

    C nar , D. C., Bilir , S., S ahin , T., & Plevne , O. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.17844

    2025 arXiv

  36. [44]

    2024, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 684, A37

    Ceccarelli, E., Massari, D., Mucciarelli, A., et al. 2024, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 684, A37

    2024

  37. [45]

    J., Peletier , R

    Cenarro , A. J., Peletier , R. F., S \'a nchez-Bl \'a zquez , P., et al. 2007, , 374, 664

    2007

  38. [46]

    Chiba , M., & Beers , T. C. 2000, , 119, 2843

    2000

  39. [47]

    2011, , 412, 1237

    Co s kuno g lu , B., Ak , S., Bilir , S., et al. 2011, , 412, 1237

    2011

  40. [48]

    L., & Sneden , C

    Cottrell , P. L., & Sneden , C. 1986, , 161, 314

    1986

  41. [49]

    1994, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Crabtree , D., Durand , D., Fisher , W., et al. 1994, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 61, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems III, ed. D. R. Crabtree , R. J. Hanisch , & J. Barnes , 123

    1994

  42. [50]

    M., Freeman , K

    De Silva , G. M., Freeman , K. C., Bland-Hawthorn , J., et al. 2015, , 449, 2604

    2015

  43. [51]

    2018, , 615, A31

    Deka-Szymankiewicz , B., Niedzielski , A., Adamczyk , M., et al. 2018, , 615, A31

    2018

  44. [52]

    A., Lawler , J

    Den Hartog , E. A., Lawler , J. E., Sobeck , J. S., Sneden , C., & Cowan , J. J. 2011, , 194, 35

    2011

  45. [53]

    2016, , 590, A9

    Dias , B., Barbuy , B., Saviane , I., et al. 2016, , 590, A9

    2016

  46. [54]

    2013, , 559, A102

    Dobrovolskas , V., Ku c inskas , A., Steffen , M., et al. 2013, , 559, A102

    2013

  47. [55]

    M., Helmi, A., et al

    Dodd, E., Callingham, T. M., Helmi, A., et al. 2023, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 670, L2

    2023

  48. [56]

    o ner , S., Ak , S., \

    D \"o ner , S., Ak , S., \"O nal Ta s , \"O ., & Plevne , O. 2023, Physics and Astronomy Reports, 1, 11

    2023

  49. [57]

    K., Smith , G

    Dupree , A. K., Smith , G. H., & Strader , J. 2009, , 138, 1485

    2009

  50. [58]

    Eggen , O. J. 1998, , 115, 2435

    1998

  51. [59]

    J., Lynden-Bell , D., & Sandage , A

    Eggen , O. J., Lynden-Bell , D., & Sandage , A. R. 1962, , 136, 748

    1962

  52. [60]

    2003, , 397, L1

    Feltzing , S., Bensby , T., & Lundstr \"o m , I. 2003, , 397, L1

    2003

  53. [61]

    K., Sahlholdt , C

    Feuillet , D. K., Sahlholdt , C. L., Feltzing , S., & Casagrande , L. 2021, , 508, 1489

    2021

  54. [62]

    1993, , 274, 821

    Francois , P., Spite , M., & Spite , F. 1993, , 274, 821

    1993

  55. [63]

    R., et al

    Frebel , A., Lunnan , R., Casey , A. R., et al. 2013, , 771, 39

    2013

  56. [64]

    R., & Wiese , W

    Fuhr , J. R., & Wiese , W. L. 2006, Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, 35, 1669

    2006

  57. [65]

    1998, , 338, 161

    Fuhrmann , K. 1998, , 338, 161

    1998

  58. [66]

    2025, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, 77, 178

    Fukushima, T., Chiba, M., Tanaka, M., et al. 2025, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, 77, 178

    2025

  59. [67]

    Fulbright , J. P. 2000, , 120, 1841

    2000

  60. [68]

    2002, , 123, 404

    ---. 2002, , 123, 404

    2002

  61. [69]

    2022, VizieR Online Data Catalog: Gaia DR3 Part 1

    Gaia Collaboration . 2022, VizieR Online Data Catalog: Gaia DR3 Part 1. Main source (Gaia Collaboration, 2022) , VizieR On-line Data Catalog: I/355. Originally published in: Astron. Astrophys., in prep. (2022), , , doi:10.26093/cds/vizier.1355

    2022 doi

  62. [70]

    Gaia Collaboration , Prusti , T., de Bruijne , J. H. J., et al. 2016, , 595, A1

    2016

  63. [71]

    Gaia Collaboration , Brown , A. G. A., Vallenari , A., et al. 2018, , 616, A1

    2018

  64. [72]

    Gaia Collaboration , Vallenari , A., Brown , A. G. A., et al. 2023 a , , 674, A1

    2023

  65. [73]

    2023 b , , 674, A1

    ---. 2023 b , , 674, A1

    2023

  66. [74]

    E., S \'a nchez-Bl \'a zquez , P., Vazdekis , A., et al

    Garc \' a P \'e rez , A. E., S \'a nchez-Bl \'a zquez , P., Vazdekis , A., et al. 2021, , 505, 4496

    2021

  67. [75]

    2020, , 639, A63

    Gaulme , P., Jackiewicz , J., Spada , F., et al. 2020, , 639, A63

    2020

  68. [76]

    1983, , 202, 1025

    Gilmore , G., & Reid , N. 1983, , 202, 1025

    1983

  69. [77]

    2012, The Messenger, 147, 25

    Gilmore , G., Randich , S., Asplund , M., et al. 2012, The Messenger, 147, 25

    2012

  70. [78]

    K., Sneden , C., Pilachowski , C

    Gilroy , K. K., Sneden , C., Pilachowski , C. A., & Cowan , J. J. 1988, , 327, 298

    1988

  71. [79]

    A., & Mosenkov , A

    Gontcharov , G. A., & Mosenkov , A. V. 2019, , 483, 299

    2019

  72. [80]

    2001, , 152, 185

    Gonzalez , G., Brownlee , D., & Ward , P. 2001, , 152, 185

    2001

  73. [81]

    I., & Bonifacio , P

    Gonz \'a lez Hern \'a ndez , J. I., & Bonifacio , P. 2009, , 497, 497

    2009

  74. [82]

    2021, , 504, 3494

    Gran , F., Zoccali , M., Rojas-Arriagada , A., et al. 2021, , 504, 3494

    2021

  75. [83]

    2006, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 455, 271

    Gratton, R., Lucatello, S., Bragaglia, A., et al. 2006, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 455, 271

    2006

  76. [84]

    G., Carretta , E., & Castelli , F

    Gratton , R. G., Carretta , E., & Castelli , F. 1996, , 314, 191

    1996

  77. [85]

    G., Carretta , E., Desidera , S., et al

    Gratton , R. G., Carretta , E., Desidera , S., et al. 2003, , 406, 131

    2003

  78. [86]

    G., & Ortolani , S

    Gratton , R. G., & Ortolani , S. 1984, , 137, 6

    1984

  79. [87]

    1986, , 169, 201

    ---. 1986, , 169, 201

    1986

  80. [88]

    G., & Sneden , C

    Gratton , R. G., & Sneden , C. 1991, , 241, 501

    1991

  81. [89]

    1994, , 287, 927

    ---. 1994, , 287, 927

    1994

  82. [90]

    G., Sneden , C., Carretta , E., & Bragaglia , A

    Gratton , R. G., Sneden , C., Carretta , E., & Bragaglia , A. 2000, , 354, 169

    2000

  83. [91]

    2016, , 592, A70

    Hawkins , K., Jofr \'e , P., Heiter , U., et al. 2016, , 592, A70

    2016

  84. [92]

    R., Bovy , J., Holtzman , J

    Hayden , M. R., Bovy , J., Holtzman , J. A., et al. 2015, , 808, 132

    2015

  85. [93]

    R., Majewski , S

    Hayes , C. R., Majewski , S. R., Shetrone , M., et al. 2018, , 852, 49

    2018

  86. [94]

    2012, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Heijmans , J., Asplund , M., Barden , S., et al. 2012, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 8446, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy IV, ed. I. S. McLean , S. K. Ramsay , & H. Takami , 84460W

    2012

  87. [95]

    2015, , 582, A49

    Heiter , U., Jofr \'e , P., Gustafsson , B., et al. 2015, , 582, A49

    2015

  88. [96]

    2021, , 645, A106

    Heiter , U., Lind , K., Bergemann , M., et al. 2021, , 645, A106

    2021

  89. [97]

    2020, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 58, 205

    Helmi, A. 2020, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 58, 205

    2020

  90. [98]

    H., et al

    Helmi , A., Babusiaux , C., Koppelman , H. H., et al. 2018, , 563, 85

    2018

  91. [99]

    L., Pietrinferni , A., Cassisi , S., et al

    Hidalgo , S. L., Pietrinferni , A., Cassisi , S., et al. 2018, , 856, 125

    2018

  92. [100]

    S., et al

    Hon , M., Huber , D., Kuszlewicz , J. S., et al. 2021, , 919, 131

    2021

  93. [101]

    1988, Michigan Catalogue of Two-dimensional Spectral Types for the HD Stars

    Houk , N., & Smith-Moore , M. 1988, Michigan Catalogue of Two-dimensional Spectral Types for the HD Stars. Volume 4, Declinations -26 .0 to -12 .0. , Vol. 4

    1988

  94. [102]

    D., Murray, J., Mills, D., & Berry, D

    Howarth, I. D., Murray, J., Mills, D., & Berry, D. S. 1998, Starlink User Note 50 , starlink User Note, 50

    1998

  95. [103]

    W., Yuan , H

    Huang , Y., Liu , X. W., Yuan , H. B., et al. 2015, , 454, 2863

    2015

  96. [104]

    N., Aoki , W., & Chiba , M

    Ishigaki , M. N., Aoki , W., & Chiba , M. 2013, , 771, 67

    2013

  97. [105]

    N., Chiba , M., & Aoki , W

    Ishigaki , M. N., Chiba , M., & Aoki , W. 2012, , 753, 64

    2012

  98. [106]

    I., Dupree , A

    Johnson , C. I., Dupree , A. K., Mateo , M., et al. 2020, , 159, 254

    2020

  99. [107]

    Johnson , D. R. H., & Soderblom , D. R. 1987, , 93, 864

    1987

  100. [108]

    2013, , 554, A81

    Kacharov , N., Koch , A., & McWilliam , A. 2013, , 554, A81

    2013

  101. [109]

    Y., & Plevne , O

    Karaali , S., Bilir , S., G \"o k c e , E. Y., & Plevne , O. 2019, , 36, e040

    2019

  102. [110]

    Karata s , Y., Bilir , S., & Schuster , W. J. 2005, , 360, 1345

    2005

  103. [111]

    R., Nordlander , T., et al

    Karovicova , I., White , T. R., Nordlander , T., et al. 2022, , 658, A48

    2022

  104. [112]

    2020, , 640, A25

    ---. 2020, , 640, A25

    2020

  105. [113]

    1967, , 149, 299

    Koelbloed , D. 1967, , 149, 299

    1967

  106. [114]

    2008, , 385, 1998

    Koleva , M., Prugniel , P., Ocvirk , P., Le Borgne , D., & Soubiran , C. 2008, , 385, 1998

    2008

  107. [115]

    2012, , 538, A143

    Koleva , M., & Vazdekis , A. 2012, , 538, A143

    2012

  108. [116]

    2019, , 628, A54

    Kovalev , M., Bergemann , M., Ting , Y.-S., & Rix , H.-W. 2019, , 628, A54

    2019

  109. [117]

    L., Furenlid , I., Brault , J., & Testerman , L

    Kurucz , R. L., Furenlid , I., Brault , J., & Testerman , L. 1984

    1984

  110. [118]

    K., Bolte , M., Johnson , J

    Lai , D. K., Bolte , M., Johnson , J. A., et al. 2008, , 681, 1524

    2008

  111. [119]

    M., Lattanzi , M

    Lasker , B. M., Lattanzi , M. G., McLean , B. J., et al. 2008, , 136, 735

    2008

  112. [120]

    E., Sneden , C., & Cowan , J

    Lawler , J. E., Sneden , C., & Cowan , J. J. 2015, , 220, 13

    2015

  113. [121]

    E., Sneden , C., Cowan , J

    Lawler , J. E., Sneden , C., Cowan , J. J., Ivans , I. I., & Den Hartog , E. A. 2009, , 182, 51

    2009

  114. [122]

    E., Wood , M

    Lawler , J. E., Wood , M. P., Den Hartog , E. A., et al. 2014, , 215, 20

    2014

  115. [123]

    Li , H., Du , C., Liu , S., Donlon , T., & Newberg , H. J. 2019, , 874, 74

    2019

  116. [124]

    2012, , 427, 50

    Lind , K., Bergemann , M., & Asplund , M. 2012, , 427, 50

    2012

  117. [125]

    J., Wang , L., Takeda , Y., Bharat Kumar , Y., & Zhao , G

    Liu , Y. J., Wang , L., Takeda , Y., Bharat Kumar , Y., & Zhao , G. 2019, , 482, 4155

    2019

  118. [126]

    2022, , 665, A10

    Lombardo , L., Bonifacio , P., Fran c ois , P., et al. 2022, , 665, A10

    2022

  119. [127]

    E., & Bond , H

    Luck , R. E., & Bond , H. E. 1981, , 244, 919

    1981

  120. [128]

    T., Bovy , J., Leung , H

    Mackereth , J. T., Bovy , J., Leung , H. W., et al. 2019, , 489, 176

    2019

  121. [129]

    2019, , 881, 104

    Magurno , D., Sneden , C., Bono , G., et al. 2019, , 881, 104

    2019

  122. [130]

    Majewski , S. R. 1992, , 78, 87

    1992

  123. [131]

    R., Schiavon , R

    Majewski , S. R., Schiavon , R. P., Frinchaboy , P. M., et al. 2017, , 154, 94

    2017

  124. [132]

    2024, Astronomische Nachrichten, 345, e20240047

    Mar s mak , M., S ahin , T., G \"u ney , F., Plevne , O., & Bilir , S. 2024, Astronomische Nachrichten, 345, e20240047

    2024

  125. [133]

    2009, , 694, 1498

    Mar \' n-Franch , A., Aparicio , A., Piotto , G., et al. 2009, , 694, 1498

    2009

  126. [134]

    2017, , 604, A129

    Mashonkina , L., Jablonka , P., Pakhomov , Y., Sitnova , T., & North , P. 2017, , 604, A129

    2017

  127. [135]

    Matrozis , E., Ryde , N., & Dupree , A. K. 2013, , 559, A115

    2013

  128. [136]

    McMillan , P. J. 2017, , 465, 76

    2017

  129. [137]

    2002, , 575, 474

    Mel \'e ndez , J., & Barbuy , B. 2002, , 575, 474

    2002

  130. [138]

    A., et al

    M \'e sz \'a ros , S., Masseron , T., Garc \' a-Hern \'a ndez , D. A., et al. 2020, , 492, 1641

    2020

  131. [139]

    Mihalas , D., & Binney , J. 1981

    1981

  132. [140]

    2017, , 600, A22

    Mikolaitis , S ., de Laverny , P., Recio-Blanco , A., et al. 2017, , 600, A22

    2017

  133. [141]

    V., & Kovtyukh , V

    Mishenina , T. V., & Kovtyukh , V. V. 2001, , 370, 951

    2001

  134. [142]

    V., Kovtyukh , V

    Mishenina , T. V., Kovtyukh , V. V., Korotin , S. A., & Soubiran , C. 2003, Astronomy Reports, 47, 422

    2003

  135. [143]

    V., Kovtyukh , V

    Mishenina , T. V., Kovtyukh , V. V., Soubiran , C., Travaglio , C., & Busso , M. 2002, , 396, 189

    2002

  136. [144]

    V., Soubiran , C., Kovtyukh , V

    Mishenina , T. V., Soubiran , C., Kovtyukh , V. V., & Korotin , S. A. 2004, , 418, 551

    2004

  137. [145]

    1975, , 27, 533

    Miyamoto , M., & Nagai , R. 1975, , 27, 533

    1975

  138. [146]

    G., Frasca , A., et al

    Molenda- \.Z akowicz , J., Sousa , S. G., Frasca , A., et al. 2013, , 434, 1422

    2013

  139. [147]

    2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 474, 4541

    Mura-Guzmán, A., Villanova, S., Muñoz, C., & Tang, B. 2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 474, 4541. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx2918

    2017 doi

  140. [148]

    P., Conroy , C., Bonaca , A., et al

    Naidu , R. P., Conroy , C., Bonaca , A., et al. 2020, , 901, 48

    2020

  141. [149]

    F., Frenk , C

    Navarro , J. F., Frenk , C. S., & White , S. D. M. 1996, , 462, 563

    1996

  142. [150]

    2022, , 926, 189

    Necib , L., & Lin , T. 2022, , 926, 189

    2022

  143. [151]

    2016, , 585, A73

    Niedzielski , A., Deka-Szymankiewicz , B., Adamczyk , M., et al. 2016, , 585, A73

    2016

  144. [152]

    Nissen , P. E. 2004, in Origin and Evolution of the Elements, ed. A. McWilliam & M. Rauch , 154

    2004

  145. [153]

    E., & Schuster , W

    Nissen , P. E., & Schuster , W. J. 2010, , 511, L10

    2010

  146. [154]

    2011, , 530, A15

    ---. 2011, , 530, A15

    2011

  147. [155]

    S., Neumayer , N., H \"a berle , M., et al

    Nitschai , M. S., Neumayer , N., H \"a berle , M., et al. 2024, , 970, 152

    2024

  148. [156]

    O nal Ta s , \

    \"O nal Ta s , \"O ., Bilir , S., & Plevne , O. 2018, , 363, 35

    2018

  149. [157]

    Origlia , L., Valenti , E., & Rich , R. M. 2008, , 388, 1419

    2008

  150. [158]

    2023, , 673, A86

    Pagnini , G., Di Matteo , P., Khoperskov , S., et al. 2023, , 673, A86

    2023

  151. [159]

    D., & Silva , D

    Pal , T., Khan , I., Worthey , G., Gregg , M. D., & Silva , D. R. 2023, , 266, 41

    2023

  152. [160]

    J., Yi , S

    Park , M. J., Yi , S. K., Peirani , S., et al. 2021, , 254, 2

    2021

  153. [161]

    D., Limberg , G., Amarante , J

    Perottoni , H. D., Limberg , G., Amarante , J. A. S., et al. 2022, , 936, L2

    2022

  154. [162]

    2014, , 126, 469

    Petit , P., Louge , T., Th \'e ado , S., et al. 2014, , 126, 469

    2014

  155. [163]

    2021, , 908, 102

    Pietrinferni , A., Hidalgo , S., Cassisi , S., et al. 2021, , 908, 102

    2021

  156. [164]

    A., Sneden , C., & Booth , J

    Pilachowski , C. A., Sneden , C., & Booth , J. 1993, , 407, 699

    1993

  157. [165]

    A., Sneden , C., & Kraft , R

    Pilachowski , C. A., Sneden , C., & Kraft , R. P. 1996, , 111, 1689

    1996

  158. [166]

    O nal Ta s , \

    Plevne , O., \"O nal Ta s , \"O ., Bilir , S., & Seabroke , G. M. 2020, , 893, 108

    2020

  159. [167]

    X., & McWilliam , A

    Prochaska , J. X., & McWilliam , A. 2000, , 537, L57

    2000

  160. [168]

    2001, , 369, 1048

    Prugniel , P., & Soubiran , C. 2001, , 369, 1048

    2001

  161. [169]

    2011, , 531, A165

    Prugniel , P., Vauglin , I., & Koleva , M. 2011, , 531, A165

    2011

  162. [170]

    2014, , 567, A5

    Recio-Blanco , A., de Laverny , P., Kordopatis , G., et al. 2014, , 567, A5

    2014

  163. [171]

    E., Lambert , D

    Reddy , B. E., Lambert , D. L., & Allende Prieto , C. 2006, , 367, 1329

    2006

  164. [172]

    E., Tomkin , J., Lambert , D

    Reddy , B. E., Tomkin , J., Lambert , D. L., & Allende Prieto , C. 2003, , 340, 304

    2003

  165. [173]

    2013, , 21, 61

    Rix , H.-W., & Bovy , J. 2013, , 21, 61

    2013

  166. [174]

    C., Courteau, S., Graves, G., & Schiavon, R

    Roediger, J. C., Courteau, S., Graves, G., & Schiavon, R. P. 2013, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 210, 10

    2013

  167. [175]

    2017, Turkish Journal of Physics, 41, 367

    S ahin, T. 2017, Turkish Journal of Physics, 41, 367

    2017

  168. [176]

    2020, , 899, 41

    S ahin, T., & Bilir , S. 2020, , 899, 41

    2020

  169. [177]

    u ney , F., S ent \

    S ahin, T., G \"u ney , F., S ent \"u rk , S. A., C nar , N., & Mar s mak , M. 2024, Physics and Astronomy Reports, 2, 65

    2024

  170. [178]

    S ahin, T., & Lambert , D. L. 2009, , 398, 1730

    2009

  171. [179]

    L., Klochkova , V

    S ahin, T., Lambert , D. L., Klochkova , V. G., & Panchuk , V. E. 2016, , 461, 4071

    2016

  172. [180]

    L., Klochkova , V

    S ahin, T., Lambert , D. L., Klochkova , V. G., & Tavolganskaya , N. S. 2011, , 410, 612

    2011

  173. [181]

    2023, Physics and Astronomy Reports, 1, 54

    S ahin, T., Mar s mak , M., C nar , N., & Bilir , S. 2023, Physics and Astronomy Reports, 1, 54

    2023

  174. [182]

    2022, , 509, 5197

    Salaris , M., Cassisi , S., Pietrinferni , A., & Hidalgo , S. 2022, , 509, 5197

    2022

  175. [183]

    1969, , 158, 1115

    Sandage , A. 1969, , 158, 1115

    1969

  176. [184]

    Santos , J. F. C., J., & Piatti , A. E. 2004, , 428, 79

    2004

  177. [185]

    Santos-Peral , P., S \'a nchez-Bl \'a zquez , P., Vazdekis , A., & Palicio , P. A. 2023, , 672, A166

    2023

  178. [186]

    P., Phillips , S

    Schiavon , R. P., Phillips , S. G., Myers , N., et al. 2024, , 528, 1393

    2024

  179. [187]

    1978, Astrophysical Journal, Part 1, vol

    Searle, L., & Zinn, R. 1978, Astrophysical Journal, Part 1, vol. 225, Oct. 15, 1978, p. 357-379., 225, 357

    1978

  180. [188]

    u rk, S. A., S ahin , T., G \

    S ent \"u rk, S. A., S ahin , T., G \"u ney , F., Bilir , S., & Mar s mak , M. 2024, , 976, 175

    2024

  181. [189]

    Skiff , B. A. 2014, VizieR Online Data Catalog: Catalogue of Stellar Spectral Classifications (Skiff, 2009- ) , VizieR On-line Data Catalog: B/mk. Originally published in: Lowell Observatory (October 2014), ,

    2014

  182. [190]

    1974, , 189, 493

    Sneden , C. 1974, , 189, 493

    1974

  183. [191]

    P., Prosser , C

    Sneden , C., Kraft , R. P., Prosser , C. F., & Langer , G. E. 1991, , 102, 2001

    1991

  184. [192]

    S., Ivans , I

    Sobeck , J. S., Ivans , I. I., Simmerer , J. A., et al. 2006, , 131, 2949

    2006

  185. [193]

    V., & Kovtyukh , V

    Soubiran , C., Bienaym \'e , O., Mishenina , T. V., & Kovtyukh , V. V. 2008, , 480, 91

    2008

  186. [194]

    2003, , 398, 141

    Soubiran , C., Bienaym \'e , O., & Siebert , A. 2003, , 398, 141

    2003

  187. [195]

    2022, , 663, A4

    Soubiran , C., Brouillet , N., & Casamiquela , L. 2022, , 663, A4

    2022

  188. [196]

    2016, , 591, A118

    Soubiran , C., Le Campion , J.-F., Brouillet , N., & Chemin , L. 2016, , 591, A118

    2016

  189. [197]

    F., Cayrel de Strobel , G., & Caillo , A

    Soubiran , C., Le Campion , J. F., Cayrel de Strobel , G., & Caillo , A. 2010, , 515, A111

    2010

  190. [198]

    L., Lagarde , N., et al

    Soubiran , C., Creevey , O. L., Lagarde , N., et al. 2024, , 682, A145

    2024

  191. [199]

    1978, , 67, 23

    Spite , M., & Spite , F. 1978, , 67, 23

    1978

  192. [200]

    2006, , 132, 1645

    Steinmetz , M., Zwitter , T., Siebert , A., et al. 2006, , 132, 1645

    2006

  193. [201]

    M., & Micic , M

    Stojkovi \'c , N., Vukoti \'c , B., Martinovi \'c , N., \'C irkovi \'c , M. M., & Micic , M. 2019, , 490, 408

    2019

  194. [202]

    2015, , 450, 397

    Takeda , Y., & Tajitsu , A. 2015, , 450, 397

    2015

  195. [203]

    2016, , 457, 4454

    Takeda , Y., Tajitsu , A., Sato , B., et al. 2016, , 457, 4454

    2016

  196. [204]

    F., Battaglia , G., Grand , R

    Thomas , G. F., Battaglia , G., Grand , R. J. J., & Aguiar \'A lvarez , A. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.10398

    2025

  197. [205]

    Tomkin , J., & Lambert , D. L. 1999, , 523, 234

    1999

  198. [206]

    2011, , 535, A42

    Trevisan , M., Barbuy , B., Eriksson , K., et al. 2011, , 535, A42

    2011

  199. [207]

    2019, Advances in Space Research, 63, 1360

    Tun c el G \"u c tekin , S., Bilir , S., Karaali , S., Plevne , O., & Ak , S. 2019, Advances in Space Research, 63, 1360

    2019

  200. [208]

    2019, , 482, 1275

    Usher , C., Beckwith , T., Bellstedt , S., et al. 2019, , 482, 1275

    2019

  201. [209]

    2021, Gaia EDR3 documentation , Gaia EDR3 documentation, European Space Agency; Gaia Data Processing and Analysis Consortium

    van Leeuwen , F., de Bruijne , J., Babusiaux , C., et al. 2021, Gaia EDR3 documentation , Gaia EDR3 documentation, European Space Agency; Gaia Data Processing and Analysis Consortium. Online at https://gea.esac.esa.int/archive/documentation/GEDR3/index.html, ,

    2021

  202. [210]

    2021, , 505, 5978

    Vasiliev , E., & Baumgardt , H. 2021, , 505, 5978

    2021

  203. [211]

    A., Irwin , M., Shetrone , M

    Venn , K. A., Irwin , M., Shetrone , M. D., et al. 2004, , 128, 1177

    2004

  204. [212]

    G., & Cassisi , S

    Villanova , S., Geisler , D., Gratton , R. G., & Cassisi , S. 2014, , 791, 107

    2014

  205. [213]

    E., et al

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, Nature Methods, 17, 261

    2020

  206. [214]

    J., et al

    Yanny , B., Rockosi , C., Newberg , H. J., et al. 2009, , 137, 4377

    2009

  207. [215]

    2017, , 362, 185

    Yaz G \"o k c e , E., Bilir , S., Karaali , S., & Plevne , O. 2017, , 362, 185

    2017

  208. [216]

    1982, , 34, 365

    Yoshii , Y. 1982, , 34, 365

    1982

  209. [217]

    R., et al

    Yu , J., Huber , D., Bedding , T. R., et al. 2018, , 236, 42

    2018

  210. [218]

    2012, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 12, 723

    Zhao , G., Zhao , Y.-H., Chu , Y.-Q., Jing , Y.-P., & Deng , L.-C. 2012, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 12, 723

    2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.